Andrew Ruble Yes

That's Bach music for you! :)

Oh yes!

Lol

Bach was the king of recycling music lol, especially chorale harmonizations and cantata parts. Part of why his output is so massive.

Είναι προφανές ότι είστε άσχετοι από σύνθεση. Οι συνθέσεις έχουν μια συνέχεια, από τη μία στην άλλη. Όλοι έτσι έκαναν πριν και μετά από αυτόν. Όχι μόνο στη μουσική, γενικά όλοι οι καλλιτέχνες. Μάθετε την έννοια της παραλλαγής, παρακαλώ και την ικανότητά της να προσδιορίζει το αρχικό θέμα

@@KennyCnotG I'd say Handel was the King of that.

@@pseunition6038 yeah he's a contender for that lol but it was definitely much more common to unashamedly rework pieces back then, compared to more modern times like 20th century to now it feels like. Unless your Eric Whitacre ;)

Liszt (and I) did that every so often as well!

Panda mucho menos Bach :)

I think thats why its called the fiddle prelude and fugue, but this would have come first

Spitzflöte15 4 why would this have come first?

@Andrew Aiello maybe, but the fugue doesn’t really sound like it was composed for organ. The arpeggios in the top voice are very typical of violin compositions, the piece in general seems to not take advantage of the organ’s power, which is unusual for Bach’s organ fugues, not to mention the pedals are noticeably sparse, which is again unusual for Bach, who was known for complex and clever pedal work, but this would make sense if it were arranged from violin. In general, though, violin pieces, particularly fugues, need to be composed with the capabilities of the violin in mind. There are chords and intervals that can’t be performed, or if so only with extreme difficulty, on a violin that would be simple on a keyboard. Violin pieces are more frequently transcribed for other instruments than the other way around.

Yes, except that all the 5 voci are... Silly and don't even sound like melodies lol

Yes, I thought the same when I heard that section, but I think it's quite commun in J.S.Bach's music to reuse melodies.

@@kino4653 it's not yhe same but they are passages of the same violin technique so they sound similar. Both pieces are violin transcriptions

Obviously the former. As string instruments are ill-suited to the complex polyphony of a fugue, such compositions are tailor-made for the violin.

I recognized the fugue but had no clue where it came from. I'm so happy you told me where it came from.

it's the fuga of the 1 st sonata

Based on the BWV number, this fugue got transcribed for the violin sonata.

sykhro BWV is organized by genre, not by date. BWV starts with cantatas, masses, organ works, keyboard works, solos, orchestral works, etc.

Idk which movie is, but I know this fugue from ,Bach's another masterpiece, Violin sonata G minor Fuga part.

Definitely not equal, but can't tell what it is... maybe a Kirnberger III?

@Gerubach: why did you pair the prelude played by Peter Hurford with the fugue from Michel Chapuis? I think the original recording of Michel Chapuis is second to none, listen to: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/brJpm8mlnpyzko0.html Especially the notes enegales (pointed rhythm) used here are very beautiful. The organ is the Arp Schnitger from the Saint Michael Church in Zwolle, the Netherlands.The leaflet does not state the individual stops used for these interludes. There is also a master class from Michel Chapuis on KZfaq where he analyses BWV539...

the rather special registration could include a stopped flute 8’ and a soft double octave 2’, perhaps even triple octave 1’, in that case without the 2’.

Henri Roy cool but I think that the violin fugue sounds more wow

Felix Mendelssohn it’s the other way around. It’s originally from his violin sonata 1.