I think what you're looking at is an Acura nsx already!

Acc0rd79 that’s a TLX my guy

@@Trevor_Leach TLX is just the V6 with slightly higher compression, no turbo. A turbo'd V6 could easily be spitting out 350+hp (if not 400) from the factory and be one mean Type R.

Supercharger would be good too

We'll see how awesome you think it is when you find out how expensive it is to replace a busted turbocharger

Rusty Traylor amen

Or when your transmission fails...since Honda is notorious for transmission failures with their V6 engines.

@@hillstones In the older ones with the automatic, yes. But if it is paired to a manual transmission, it is fine. However, the newer automatics for the V6 Hondas/Acuras seem to be a lot better.

A L don’t forget this Honda service bulletin that affected all Accords and Civics with manual transmissions from 2003-2008 “Transmission Grinds When Shifting Into 3rd Gear, Pops Out of 3rd Gear, or is Hard to Shift Into 3rd Gear”. But yes, their manuals are generally more reliable than their automatics. Of course now you have their 1.5L turbos mixing gas and oil.

@@hillstones Yes that is always an issue with the manual transmission. Strangely, putting in GM synchromesh fluid actually fixes the issue. Yah the 1.5L mixing gas and oil is just bad news.

That makes me happy to hear since I will be getting a used 2017 touring. After researching for the last 5 months I have settled on this car.

All power 💪

@@jlhumor1565 hey man i really want an accord coupe too but my dad says since the car i discontinued its gonna be harder to find parts, what are your thoughts on that.

Please advice, can I buy a used 2009 3.5 v6 accord ? 40,000 kilometres ran till now.

@@andresm1704 you got nothing to worry about. There are plenty of places on the internet to find aftermarket parts. Not to mention the autozone or O'Reilly's type places.

I am wondering what trim level will the 2.0T going to be.

Sport and Above only

Richard Petrus Sport, EX, EX-L and Touring, and even the Sport 2.0t trim is very well equipped, with items such as a sunroof, partial leather seats, heated seats, etc, even when optioned with the 6mt.

“Non-sporty?”

Okudzeto Ackah The Accord V6 isn't a sports sedan like a BMW or Audi. But they are still fast af (kinda like the Nissan Maxima)

With Style If they added DI to the V6 and 2 more gears that would definitely close the gap...

With Style, Honda is waaaay too conservative for that. Honda refuses to go outside of their element... shame really!

With Style Yeah but the mpg would suck

would you pay 8 grand more? i doubt so...

In the real world... NOBODY would by it. Shit, NOBODY buys the V6 coupe as is now -- hence the cancellation.

Getting the touring off sound alone. Heard one of em at my job yesterday and man it sounded so good

I had a 12' Accord V6 and it ever new on me. It looked totally like an old man car. Big a boaty looking. With these new accord and they still haven't grown on me.

I'm not sure when the will do an Accord refresh, but from what I'm hearing will be after 2020 sometime. And not sure what they will refresh, but will be little things here and there, but don't see anything major. They may offer a spoiler on the touring model, maybe heated rear seats on the EX models, different wheel designs, etc. I owned a previous generation accord and now a new one and they are vastly different. I absolutely love the new one. I get so excited when I just get ready to drive it. I have a Sport 2.0T model with the 10 speed. I will be doing some stereo work to it shortly, but that is really it. It is my daily driver. All accords are great cars, no matter what year.

If you felt the 2011 Accord was so ugly, why did you buy it?

@@expsterm1 Excellent question! We are waiting for the answer! Why did you buy it?

Matt Walker I bought my 2017 accord v6 when the new ones were rolling out. I love my v6. It was one of the last 4 in the lot. The mpg can be bad if you have a heavy foot like me. But the power is awesome

You got that right. The roar from the factory intake is amazing. Those crappy fake tail pipes in the bumper they have to use now because DI motor make lots of soot are garbage.

Goodman diad u not complaining ab that extra power from the di tho 😂

Yes, keep your more talk and less walk.

honda has issues with their GDI engines with oil dilution

I had the this accord turbo and is not that fast I sold it and got the 2017 by so much more responsive and no turbo lag and the car looks alot nicer

Can't, my back hurts

@@jamesgand828 LOL

My kidney stones... give me a sec

What about 19 year old 😎

My personal opinion as an owner of both Camry and Accord hybrids, Honda is a little bit better. Camry is boring for me, especially the interior, I think it's for older people above 50 years maybe. But it's still a great car. Interesting what you think after 3 years)

@@CHEloveg22 Yes, I think this a fair comparison as you have both kinds of cars and experience them first hand, and you offered your opinion in a different perspective.

dont run the 2.0T you will lose, I just turn the "gizmos" off - the new car is lighter, handles better, and gets off the line much better. Keep the oil changed the K20 will go 200k+ no problem

@@fzr1000981 I'll blow your doors off buddy! Happy New Year from one Honda guy to another ;)

not stock - 0-60 the 10 speed 2.0T beats the V6 every time, 1/4 mile in the mid to high 13s

New Camaro SS for n/a goodness

Do you still have it ??

Hello Bye, irrefutable fact!

Hello Bye: Why do you care about longer engine life if after 3 years of a lease you get brand new car anyway?

O. S. Only fools lease, enjoy car payments for the rest of your life lol

Artchred Since you started dirty talk by calling me fool. Get this. A car is immediately depreciating asset. Thus paying-for it in full is most idiotic way. With lease only part of the car is paid. With lease smart people get to drive brand new vehicle every 24-36 months. With lease smart get latest, safest vehicle. With lease a driver enjoys life Not spending money and time for maintenance of a car. With lease smart one don’t care if vehicle is hit. Try to sell a car if you own it. I guess to each his own.

O. S. You should lease when you already bought a house, or else you are keep paying your bills

Right on the mark with your comment. The rear lights seem like a dated design.

Just pull a v6 badge from an older Accord and you're good to go!

nimaside nah nah I still want to open that hood and see that v6 engine. You know.

Nobody buys an accord to go fast.

556x45mm NATO they do now.

@@EpicXXProductions oh buddy youre mistaken

Lol I saw that too lol

this should be top comment. also shows that he isnt even racing during that footage. sleezy af

I thought that too lmao

Silvana Smith agreed!

Why? Just curious...more fuel

Yes, ma'am. My V6 all day.

only V8 turbo )

Silvana Smith Here here!!

tahjo7 The grill got ugly since 2016... bad nose job, lol.

I love everything but the tail lights and the no-coupe option

Baasil F. We talked before. I'm getting the Camry XSE. Can't believe Honda screwed this up!

+slimcpa yes that Camry XSE with the white exterior with the black roof, red leather seats & quad exhaust tips is BADASS lol... This 2018 Accord is ugly. The only thing that is a deal breaker for me with that new Camry, is the lack of memory seats. I use that feature everyday in my 2011 Accord, not available in the Camry lol

Baasil F. Yeah they need to add that asap. It's just me so I'm ok. No reason they don't have it. I got black on red interior.

Baasil Give it time. It's an all new design so it takes time to adjust to. It's always best to see it in person, instead of through the camera lens. Many people are firing shots at it now, but let's see what happens down the road.😊

Van Hammer you're right... So far it doesn't look bad in that red color but I can't wait to see it in person lol

That 2.0t has to be quick lol

That 2.0T also has 4 extra gears and weighs less

The V6 just feels so smooth and natural, just wish it had the 10 speed and kept as an option!

You can also get the 2.0l turbo with a manual transmission!

It's the way the power comes on. New 2.0T will defiantly make more hp/torque at a lower RPM vs the J series making power up top. Weight difference as well.

Ehhh..... I bet the new 2.0t in my v6 ... he hung at first, but then got smoked. I digrace

@@squirrel36274 you beat the 2.0T...not bet...I digress

i have a 2011 v6 accord coupe i love it you should love yours too

There ain't nothing wrong with that car that's a badass nice 🚗

ThatGearHead YOU AINT LYING

It’s a K20 engine though so it is just as legendary as the old V6 though. I’m not a fan of 4 cylinder engines but the K20 is an exception.

ThatGearHead Amen! Couldnt have said it better

But it can and it did. Believe me, I have a J37 TL and I'd rather have the 2.0t.

I have a 14 TL-SHAWD as well. Rather keep it! Put a turbo on the older accord then it's game over

Snake Plissken thank you. I have a 16 V6 as well. Its on my channel. Love it. 2018 is a step backward in terms of technology and style wise.

D LG or maybe the 180 pounds less

Of course, weight matters, that goes without saying, but all else being equal, hp will never be as important as torque when it comes to performance.

D LG hp has better top speed

+Unreal Sure, because we all go around driving at top speed all the time. Who cares! Quick acceleration and sporty handling are what make driving fun. Top speed is totally irrelevant in most situations, even on the track, because you generally won't have enough straight tarmac to reach it.

manufacturers seem to be making excuses so they can sell you those expensive automatics and cvt transmissions. They're fine under warranty but let's see the cash tally for 2nd and 3rd owners

I always hate this saying of "selling out". They usually have 1 or 2 in the lot so of course it's gonna sell out compared to the 20 LX EX EX-L and Touring trims

I’m wondering what the hell he was talking about. He is not very informed it seems. The coupes were legends!

@@jefflarson3461 my dad bought a '13 2nd gen fit with 80,000 miles on it for $9000, only basic up-keep maintenance gone into it. He's at 120,000 miles now, thing's still running fine, the CVT holds up the same as it did when he bought it four years ago. No foreseeable major issues with it, it's got that Honda build quality for sure

I’m fairly sure it was A: stocked in lower quantities than automatic & sedan models B: manufactured in lower quantities than automatic & sedan models Obviously it’s got a higher chance of selling out when the number of units is lower. 🙄

I see them everywhere now.. I used to always see the Honda civics (in 2016) byron now? I've never realized it until now that the Honda accord is everywhere..

They are nice. Just traded my 07 in for a 16. And the 07 has more cup holders and storage space. Same amount of seating space and trunk space tho. As well the 07 felt a bit more nimble

JustJay 0312 hahah yeah the 2007 is quick. i raced one in my passat 1.8tsi and i did win but at the end it was pretty close

prices arent going up

same. 2017 v6 touring :D

2017 V6 EXL

Slower 0-60, worse gas mileage (I get 30 on the highway), nose heavy pushes through corners like crazy, 2.0T beats it in every performance test with possible exception of high speed roll - and if that's what you own the car for it's kind of laughable, my sixth gen SS Camaro obliterates it

@@fzr1000981 Comapring an SS Camaro to a family sedan? lol what

While cars drive by next to them lmao

- then why run the shoulder like that?

this car is kinda a 4 door coupe now

chrisiden would be good time to bring the prelude back for this reason but I doubt it

Superglue the back doors. Fixed.

smack9x your on to something !

chrisiden that is messed up loved the coupe and v6 the new one is ugly the front

Alex maybe you should have bought one then.

Alex, the Accord Coupe never made it into 2017. Honda stopped its production of it in 2016.

2017 was the last production year. I'll be picking one up in a few weeks - but I can see myself trading in for a '19 or '20 2.0T Sedan, or just buying the base model for practicality. Love the front styling personally, not a huge fan of the rear but I can live with it as-is and it'll probably be modified.

Get a Civic then.

sorry but that would be incorrect my 2017 accord coupe was produced may 2017

I have driven a V6 Camry & Accord, but I own a 2.0T Fusion. For me, the bottom line is the Fusion was the best bang for my buck as no one else was going to sell me 240hp with NAV for $22,500 + TTL in 2016. Fusion mpg however is below EPA, but for the money I saved over a Camcord I have plenty left to buy lotsa gas!

J35 engine isn't a torque monster and actually feels a little sluggish off the line with the auto. The old gen Camry V6 engine had better low end torque (not sure how the new one is). I'm pretty sure the 2.0t is tuned to provide enhanced low end torque response than the Type R does, and even the Type R isn't too bad in this regard.

I kind of understand why some people love not having turbo lag, but "no lag torque" doesn't say much when the J35 doesn't make much torque down low in the first place.

I suppose I should have said a smooth, progressive powerband with a healthy dose of midrange torque that 60 degree V6's are known for.

TJ Houston i'm pregnant 👪 - Your Girlfriend

L'A Nation I’m gay how that happen? 😂😂😂😂

They do not care ablut your opinion on the matter. They care about profits, therefore they look at numbers. And accord coupe do not sell as much as they should to make a big profit on it.

Tozik ummm hun... I know that.... I’m just saying not everyone likes big SUVs. And not everyone wants to be a big happy family. Not looking To argue because you wasted a whole comment telling me something I already know. At the end of the day it’s all about profits. This is what a comment section is for. Your opinion and your commentary.....

TJ Houston, you must be gay for real, otherwise that hun addition is as weird as fuck.

I have the 2015 ex-l i agree but man those refresh rims though :))

Stuart Anderson a

totally agree

the 2013-2015

Stuart Anderson I think the refresh made it look a lot better actually

We couldn't have said it better ourselves! Change is never easy but most of the times, its worth it. Give the new 2.0T a chance, it seriously impressed us and you'll see the full extent of that in our full review going live in 7 hours.

@@theredline So 3 years later, I just sold my '16 TLX V6 Advance and purchased a '20 Accord Touring 2.0T. I've only had my Accord for 2 weeks and man am I impressed! Honda has outdone themselves. This car is amazing! The engine is a gem. It pulls hard and puts the power down. So far, I have no regrets. The sound system isn't as good as the one in my Acura and the road noise isn't quite as hushed but those minor quibbles aside, this car is fantastic. What impresses me the most is that the car is so much fun to drive, has so many good features and just oozes quality for such a tremendous value. The Accord 2.0T is one hot ride!

Bet

The nose looks like a whale.

I like the fact that manufactures are trying to make the cars in this segment more attractive and less boring. The Camry's design was a huge shock. The Accord is still gaining appreciations all around. Mazda 6 is already a sexy looking car. But the Altima and the Passat looks boring to me.

"I agree"

Depends on that 10 speed auto in the car. I have a 6 speed auto w/manual mode and i only get 30-35 in manual mode coasting on the highway. you hit your 6th gear early and start chugging gas past 65mph

Should I get it over the V6 though, I’m just thinking of long term reliability, looks,performance, and decent fuel economy. I don’t know if the 4 cylinder turbo will hold up as much and as long as the v6

@@vvt2257 totally worth getting. You wont miss driving a V6, the 2.0 is FAST

Moresco24 OMG YESSS

I think it’s so they can “refresh” it, so the ones in 3 years will have the lights that the car meant to have. It’s good for their sales since the platform is still the same but updated features.

You said it exactly right but I think the previous generation tail lights looked like the one of the Mercedes SUV generations as well rather than the BMW. Very good point you made though.

Yea at night the old accord looks so much like a bmw from behind lmao

@@mrpassion1975 if you see the taillights at night when ones just driving down the road it has the horizontal lines like a bmw

two economy cars... who cares lol

Camry won already without even racing! Bye honda!

Mentu Hotep camry crashes in the corner! The accord wins lmao

The camry driver would be seeing accord taillights. Audi a4 heavier with same exact hp and tourqe 0-60 5.3 seconds. Plus the accord is geared more aggressive with the 10 speed.

Lol fuck the Camry and fuck ugly ass Toyotas. I like Lexus though still haha. Wouldn't mind a gs350.

It's a nice Acura touch

bighosre10 Well most of the people in the world are stupid unfortunately

Better is relative though, some people don't necessarily buy the last V6 model because they "think" it has more power, they buy it because it looks better. If you have to look at it every single day for at least the next 5 years, which most people will have their car for, then design is definitely a very strong point for purchasing a vehicle. I for one, bought the '16 Honda Accord, because I absolutely hate, and yes I repeat HATE the tablet stick on screen design on the dashboard and the new exterior overhaul they did. I am overly happy with my 2016, I don't give a rats ass that the 2 liter turbo pulls ahead a car length faster on an amateur drag race. If I wanted real power I'll add a supercharger to the V6 and piss all over that 2 liter turbo. And still pay less than a new Accord compared to what I paid for my barely used "new" car + supercharger install and professional mapping. It's all about personal taste. Looking at the new Honda Accord design, I gotta be honest, in 5 years, when I'll shop for a new car, the Hyundai Sonata might be my next victim. Have you seen that new design they are releasing this year? That just makes me moist.

More power in smaller motors by forced induction is never the better solution, especially if you're talking in terms of reliability. Also change isn't always good. The car has only been out for a year. Let's see how many beatdowns those 1.5t and 2.0t can take. 4 cyl n/a and v6 n/a are proven engines

No replacement for displacement. A turbo just adds extra heat and pressure and WILL wear that 4-banger out. The V6 will have an easy life and last much longer.

If you're drag racing Accords on the street, you're an immature idiot. Fact. The main issues for intelligent adults are smoothness, reliability and mileage. If I'm dropping $35k for a sedan, it better be as smooth as an Olympic golf medalist skating on a pool of frozen butter.

Very good point my friend. I feel the same exact way.

They look like staplers

Lol, I changed my 2019 tail lights to aftermarket, it’s definitely better now.

@@jamesc7121 - lol 😂

You've said that "If you drive with a heavy foot the fuel mileage on the turbo is about the same as the previous 3.5 v-6." How sure are you on this turbo engine performance, even the car is about 200 lbs lighter?

Audilife Thats why they went one. You get more power and better mpgs, which I'm sure owners will appreciate

more power？？？

Alvin Sun Well, I meant quicker as audilife said. It can make more power than the v6 with a tune. It only makes 25 more hp than the 2.0t

My Audi has 252hp and 273 torque. And with awd it’s great with launch control. Let alone highway I’m managing 36-38mpg.

+Audilife I have an Audi A4. It’s got a lot of power.

xxFallenKnight how much if the sport? Haven't seen pricing?

xxFallenKnight You’ll know the pricing soon enough! Our full review will go live at midnight this evening :)

Yes, sir. V6 3.5 liter versus 2.0?? Please. Nothing beats big engines. Nothing!!

Your car is a beauty, should definitely keep it !

Same here!!!

I have a 3.5 and with header, exhaust, cold- air and upgraded clutch"out of my way 2.0"

Because you can't afforded lol

still prefer the v6 the turbo has gas getting into oil issues v6 sounds much better too.

The direct injection in New one has issues.

the 2017 V6 coupe is faster than both

Naturally aspirated engines will always outlast turbo charged engines. This was a fat loss in Honda’s usually on the point legacy

Erik S Honda hasn’t changed the 3.5 in 10 years they could of easily upgraded it to over 300hp na and make it a 3.7 or 3.8 liter it’s too bad but it’s a tried true and proven engine which is why I went v6. Gonna turbo it eventually. The coupe barely is faster it’s advantage is weighing 150-200 lbs less that’s it.

I had to drive the 2018 for several days before I was willing to part with my '13 V6. Like a lot of other people I was more in love with idea of a V6 and was overlooking what the 2.0T can do. I've had it for 2 weeks and so far no regrets.