Can you Layer Dry Pour Concrete? (layering dry pour concrete)

  Рет қаралды 4,589

Appalachian Wood

Appalachian Wood

Жыл бұрын

In our last video, we discovered that water penetrated a dry pour concrete tube about 18". Today we're experimenting with layering dry pour concrete to create a thicker/deeper, and hopefully harder, piece of concrete.
Watch our first video with mixing dry poured concrete in the tube: • Dry pour concrete - ca...
See our experiment with a dry pour, no mix Sonotube: • Dry Pour Concrete: How...
See a three week follow up to this video: • Was I Wrong About Dry ...
I frequently wear my favorite Sugar Butte farms shirt in videos. Check my friends' farm out here: www.sugarbuttefarms.com (not sponsored in any way. I didn't even get the shirt for free!)

Пікірлер: 41
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
For everyone saying there wasn't enough water and/or a week wasn't long enough to wait, I cracked open a piece three weeks later (total of four weeks after pour). Check it out here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bax7l8d1utrWYZs.html
@scottbennett8018
@scottbennett8018 27 күн бұрын
I have put hundreds of powerpoles in (thousands even). I drill a 900 wide hole fill to the top with drymix with the pole buried 2m deep and dump 20L of water on the top so the pole doesnt move. came back to the odd one years later and pulled the pole out and it was solid concrete. You would not have known it was drymix. When its in the ground it sucks all the water out of the ground and sets proper.
@barnowl6807
@barnowl6807 Жыл бұрын
About 40 years ago I needed a STURDY mail box post to prevent kids from knocking over the box. I used a couple of tubes taped together to get the length for 3 ft. in the ground and the correct height for the box. No way to mix and pour wet I decided to try a dry pour. Knowing the water problem I used a 3/4 inch PVC pipe with a bunch of 3/64 inch holes drilled over it's length and a cap on the bottom. This was inserted in the middle before filling with dry mix. The hole was dry and the tube would prevent wet ground from getting to the cement so this seemed like a good work around. Once planted upright in the hole I filled the PVC with water. 2 hours later I filled again. Repeat every 3 hours until the water doesn't drop more than half way to the bottom. The post and box are still there even after having a go cart running into it about 20 years ago and a lot of dogs using it as a hang out.
@FisherCatProductions
@FisherCatProductions 11 ай бұрын
We dry poured hundreds of wood and metal posts over 25 years. Poured a 5 gallon bucket on them if we had the time, or just let mother nature do the job. Never had one fail. Any ones we had to pull out years later were solid blocks.
@tonyalarkon6877
@tonyalarkon6877 Жыл бұрын
thanks - super useful
@davefletch3063
@davefletch3063 Жыл бұрын
Try soaking the tube as well. In the ground, the concrete will draw moisture from everywhere it touches the ground. If you were to use it for piers, maybe forgo the tube in the underground portion
@addiejonez
@addiejonez 10 ай бұрын
But did you give it enough water or the water you gave it was that in between the layers. Remember the real dry pour you have to come back and keep watering.
@carlosreyes6448
@carlosreyes6448 11 ай бұрын
Good experiment 👏 👌 John Stamos Jr. Lol
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
How about this next? Put it in dry, then on the edges put in 4 perforated drain tubes the full length (maybe just 1 perforated tube) so the water can get down to the bottom and maybe penetrate... I don't think you can put too much water... just see how wet you can get it and if it works that way... would be cool if you could try to make a dry pour foundation or footer... but remember you can't get too much water... wet curing for 7-9 days actually makes concrete stronger... so I think you can do any type of dry pour just so it gets enough water and the dry material is evenly mixed prior to it being poured in. I really want to see if a wall can be made and a foundation... "3-in x 10-ft-PSI Corrugated Drain Pipe" - Lowes "A technique known as “wet-curing,” for example, involves laying special curing blankets across a concrete slab, dousing the blanketed surface with water, and keeping it constantly wet for 28 days." - Prosoco From ChatGPT: What is the wet cure process for concrete? ChatGPT The wet cure process for concrete refers to the method of providing adequate moisture to newly placed concrete to ensure proper hydration and strength development. It involves keeping the concrete surface continuously wet or damp for a specified period to prevent moisture loss through evaporation. Here's a general outline of the wet cure process: Placement: After the concrete is poured and finished, it needs to be properly consolidated and leveled according to the desired shape and thickness. Initial curing: As soon as the concrete is placed, it's essential to start the curing process immediately. This involves preventing rapid moisture loss from the concrete surface by covering it with a suitable material. Moisture retention: To maintain moisture within the concrete, various methods can be employed: a. Sprinkling or fogging: Water can be sprayed over the concrete surface at regular intervals to keep it wet. This method helps prevent the surface from drying out too quickly. b. Ponding: Creating small enclosures around the concrete with the help of sand, earth, or other materials to hold water in contact with the surface. This method is commonly used for horizontal surfaces like slabs. c. Wet coverings: Non-absorbent materials such as plastic sheets, damp burlap, or wet sand can be used to cover the concrete surface. These coverings are kept continuously wet during the curing period. Duration: The duration of the wet cure process depends on various factors, including the type of concrete, ambient conditions, and project specifications. Typically, wet curing is recommended for at least seven days to ensure adequate hydration and strength development. It's important to note that proper curing is crucial for the long-term durability and strength of concrete. It helps minimize cracking, improve resistance to environmental factors, and enhance overall performance. Therefore, following appropriate curing practices is essential for achieving optimal concrete quality. User What's the typical time to keep the concrete wet in wet curing? ChatGPT The duration of wet curing for concrete can vary depending on several factors, including the type of concrete, ambient conditions, project requirements, and applicable industry standards. While there is no fixed standard time for wet curing, a general guideline is to maintain the concrete surface continuously wet or damp for a minimum period of seven days. However, it's important to note that this is a minimum recommendation, and in many cases, longer curing periods may be necessary for optimal strength development and durability. For instance, in certain large-scale construction projects or when using specialized concrete mixes, extended wet curing periods of 14, 21, or even 28 days might be specified. In addition to the duration, it's also crucial to ensure that the curing conditions are appropriate. Factors such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed can affect the rate of moisture loss from the concrete and thus impact the effectiveness of the curing process. It's advisable to consult the project specifications or seek guidance from concrete experts to determine the specific wet curing duration suitable for your project.
@nymack66
@nymack66 Жыл бұрын
Here is a silly question why would you? Wet it in stages and be done.
@chuckbailey6835
@chuckbailey6835 5 ай бұрын
Gives a water measurement then proceeds to use the garden hose with no way of measuring
@oldtimeycabins
@oldtimeycabins 3 ай бұрын
You need to use a lot more water and then you tap around the edges to help get rid of air bubbles. Not to mention you add steel. This works fine if you’re not a dummy.
@zedwpd
@zedwpd Жыл бұрын
You didnt explain how long, how many times, and length of cure. 5 or 6 watering was needed. Cure time is much longer with dry pour. Romans used a form of dry pour and whenever their concrete cracked the dry pour uncured mix would wick water and seal cracks even centuries later. So Roman concrete is still strengthening itself today. This was more operator error than method of pour.
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
I didn't show all of the waterings because there are plenty of step by step videos on this already. Yes, I could have saturated the dry pocket I found. As the video says, it was one week when I opened the tube. I still have the pieces, though they've been rained on quite a bit now which would bias the experiment. I believe dry pour sidewalks and slabs are primarily successful because of their large surface area and ground contact. It does not seem suitable for taller, thinner items like a Sonotube. The stratification seems likely to occur, no matter the number of waterings, when you're pouring unmixed concrete into a tube and never mixing it. It's physics. If you make a video with a lot more water and curing time and get a Sonotube to create a usable product with a dry pour, no mix method, please let me know. I'd love to watch it!
@leahrowe847
@leahrowe847 Жыл бұрын
@appalachianwoodhomestead why can't you put a small pinholes in the bottom of tube & water until you see water start to come out the holes? That way you know you have reached the correct level of moisture needed. Or measure the correct amount of water needed per bag, & ensure your adding that amount to the tube; after all your not leveling the top & looking for a smooth surface. It seems either of these methods would be a more unbiased test than what you are offering, as your concrete is clearly lacking hydration even at the top. You don't even have the top 4" hydrated, which means you clearly didn't soak the tube several times like you should have, or the top several inches would've been different... It's clear you have an agenda, unfortunately 😕
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
@@leahrowe847 What agenda do I have? I am legit trying to see if this technique will work for a pier for a project I'm planning to do this summer. I'm trying to learn and experiment. I welcome constructive suggestions and comments. Unfortunately my wife didn't include the clip because she didn't realize how important it was, but I took a shot down the tube after watering a layer. I watered until it was visibly saturated with water on top. Others have suggested I apply a measured quantity of water, and I do plan to do that in another test next month. My bag only takes a bit over two quarts per bag, which really isn't that much. Using the same watering, but with mixing in the tube, I was able to achieve much better results. The pier fragments have now sat out in two heavy rain storms and are fully saturated. My wife, and even my daughter, are still able to crumble it by hand in places. My method certainly isn't perfect, but it's clear that mixing is important.
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
Roman concrete did that because it contained unactivated quicklime in the mix that allowed that... as well as other materials... Roman concrete is a geopolymer not a Portland type material. Portland makes linear C-S-H bonds and geopolymer makes 3D bonds which makes it stronger than Portland type concrete/cement.
@unitedstatessc
@unitedstatessc Жыл бұрын
I made a boat out of concrete for an engineering contest. Was fun. Didn't dry pour. Seems to defeat the purpose of concrete if you don't mix. Those bags have been shaken just by being in the logistics network so petite really do need to mix them just to get them to be homogeneous.
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
I agree. Mixing really seems necessary.
@centexan
@centexan Жыл бұрын
It works fine for fence posts, but I always mixed with a stick after wetting it. All other dry set is a dumbass move.
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
I'm inclined to agree with you. Trying to talk the wife into a rebound hammer so I can compare PSI strength between dry pour/no mix and actually mixing.
@centexan
@centexan Жыл бұрын
@@appalachianwoodhomestead Yes. What I left out of my post above was the time it takes to fill the slab mold, sprinkle, let dry an hour, sprinkle, let dry an hour, and repeat a number of times. It's just an exercise that gets you nowhere useful.
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
That method is more of a mix in place rather than dry pour, pretty sure mix in place or mix in the hole would work fine just so the proper amounts of each material is used within the proper time.
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
@@appalachianwoodhomestead I bet you could find a local college who might test the material for you...
@robertboryk791
@robertboryk791 Жыл бұрын
As you dry pour you mix. And add more dry and water all while mixing.
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
I did that in my first concrete video and everyone wanted to see a test without mixing. I agree that this does not result in a high quality product, but a lot of people seem to think that dry pour, no mix is the way to go. I think it may work for small slabs that are thin and getting lots of water from the ground, but it doens't seem like a viable technique for real construction.
@FisherCatProductions
@FisherCatProductions 11 ай бұрын
There is a HUGE difference between pouring this in a tube surrounded by air vs. pouring it in the ground where moisture is ever present. My crew set hundreds of posts in dry concrete over 25 years. Occasionally we dumped a 5 gallon bucket in them if we had water handy--most we just let mother nature to her job. Any that we had to pull out years later were a solid block with no dry voids. As long as the tube can absorb moisture from the ground, that pillar will do the same. Your experiment did not prove the technique was wrong, just that the experiment was apples-to-oranges flawed.
@gettinghealthynow1
@gettinghealthynow1 Жыл бұрын
Interesting experiments, but I think it is better to follow the directions of those who are doing it successfully before you start doing variations. The failure you have experienced was predictable.
@harrisorourke6926
@harrisorourke6926 Жыл бұрын
GetHealthyNow Seriously? "Following the directions" to do a successful "dry pour". "Dry pour" concrete is a malaprop. It doesn't produce concrete. It produces something that is poorly mixed, has no strength, and will fail (fall apart under pressure). Evidently, you don't believe your lying eyes--dry pour falls apart. That isn't much of a surprise. Dry pour "concrete" does not deliver concrete with the strength needed to properly perform. Yes, the failure that was experienced was predictable---dry pour concrete is not really concrete, it is just some poorly devised process that does not take as much time as doing a concrete pour correctly according to the instructions that are provided on the bag of concrete. GetHealthyNow, how about you do an experiment. Your critique is just "armchair" concrete criticism.
@gettinghealthynow1
@gettinghealthynow1 Жыл бұрын
@@harrisorourke6926 Calling me an armchair critic is valid to a degree. I have to date only done vertical "pours" using dry concrete and wetting it in a large number of post hole "pours", and the resulting concrete is more than hard enough to do the job. The post hole pours have held up for many years. When the posts have had to be removed trying to break them up was like breaking up basalt. The chemical process that cause concrete to harden does not require the concrete to be mixed into a slurry, just for a fairly uniform wetting of the mix. The failures I have seen in some youtube videos have uniformly not properly wetted the concrete. Bottom line this process is still fairly new and has had almost no "scientific" testing done. It is a fairly common expectation, amongst those doing dry pour, is that it will have different characteristics from wet pour. Varying the amount of water in wet mixes creates different qualities in the finished product and engineering concrete, particularly for structural pours is a mature, well researched and documented field. The dry pour process is still in it's infancy and clearly it is best used for specific types of work. Also, most concrete has been chemically designed with wet mixing in mind. The labor and general cost savings of doing dry pours make them very desirable. Taking into account the massively reduced labor involved, and the different characteristics of the finished product makes dry pour much better for some applications than wet pour.
@MrMichaelBCurtis
@MrMichaelBCurtis Жыл бұрын
I don't understand your thinking, concrete will never set like that, no one dry pours tons of water and then leaves it. Dry pour needs time to seep water throughout, you would have to pour each layer and sprinkle the layer from the top multiple times until the moisture is throughout before adding another bag.
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
Wet curing is the process of keeping a standard concrete project wet or under water for up to 28 days... the sprinkling is just for slabs so the smooth surface isn't ruined. "A technique known as “wet-curing,” for example, involves laying special curing blankets across a concrete slab, dousing the blanketed surface with water, and keeping it constantly wet for 28 days." - Prosoco
@MrMichaelBCurtis
@MrMichaelBCurtis 11 ай бұрын
@@VenturaIT sprinkling is for dry pours, or the cement separates. Then you have to keep wetting it for the moisture to completely permeate the entire slab
@robertoj8950
@robertoj8950 Жыл бұрын
Do another experiment but do it different. Make 2 small slab 4 inches thick , give them 3 weeks and then break them , one slab dry pour the second one mixed. That way we can see the difference in strength between mixed and dry but…..the dry one mist it first , no layers please , let it sit one hour mist it again let is sit another hour, then pour water like the guys in Cajun Country living they are amazing , is 2 showers per inch, one hour between showers so 8 showers for a 4 inch slab plus the 2 initial mists here’s how kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lZtggLt2rdiaZ2w.html
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
Wife and I were just talking about something like this. I will probably do a cut off short tube or a bucket, though. I think one of the reasons slabs seem to work so much better is that they're getting a lot of water from the ground. I don't think the showering method is providing enough water when it isn't mixed and not getting ground water. I'm trying to talk her into a tool so I can measure PSI strength. Wish me luck!
@robertoj8950
@robertoj8950 Жыл бұрын
@@appalachianwoodhomestead that sounds good I live in Arizona our ground here has not water it’s super dry so that would work great . 👍🏻
@leahrowe847
@leahrowe847 Жыл бұрын
@@robertoj8950 you're also supposed to drench the ground 1st b4 pouring 1st layer
@theshermano3000
@theshermano3000 Жыл бұрын
This test is misleading. You obviously didn't use enough water. There is no way there would be completely dry areas in the column if you used enough water.
@appalachianwoodhomestead
@appalachianwoodhomestead Жыл бұрын
If there wasn't enough water it was an honest mistake. I drenched each layer between additions. It seemed sufficient at the time. That doesn't solve the stratification problem, though. I'm about to film a follow up look at the pieces now that they've been sitting on the ground and in the rain for three weeks. We'll see how different they are now.
@theshermano3000
@theshermano3000 Жыл бұрын
@@appalachianwoodhomestead The problem, I think, is if the water doesn't soak all the way through to the layer you just poured before heaping on another layer, that water can wick UP instead of down, thereby leaving areas without being watered. You'll have to do the entire dry pour watering timeline for EACH layer. So that 4 ft column would take over 24 hours to actually do properly, I think.
@VenturaIT
@VenturaIT 11 ай бұрын
@@appalachianwoodhomestead Don't worry about misting and those steps in a pillar application, the misting is only for slabs so that the smooth surface isn't ruined... otherwise you want a lot of water once the source material is in place, you don't want so much water so that the structure is altered, you still want to keep it in a solid/powder form but you can't drench it too much unless you alter the form of the material... it's complicated... you can put as much water as in the world, just so it sets up first, that's the key, to get it to set up first, i think that's what I'm trying to say, so you want just enough for it to penetrate through all the material from top to bottom and side to side, but not enough to wash it away or for the water to overwhelm the chemistry... then once it sets you really can't put too much and you can wet cure it for 28 days... "A technique known as “wet-curing,” for example, involves laying special curing blankets across a concrete slab, dousing the blanketed surface with water, and keeping it constantly wet for 28 days." - Prosoco
How to Make A Concrete Staircase -Even in the Jungle!
11:26
LifeTransPlanet
Рет қаралды 249 М.
I Need Your Help..
00:33
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 133 МЛН
Como ela fez isso? 😲
00:12
Los Wagners
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
Did you find it?! 🤔✨✍️ #funnyart
00:11
Artistomg
Рет қаралды 121 МЛН
Dry Pour Showdown!
11:46
Michael Builds
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Dry Pour Concrete: How Deep Can you Make it?
9:22
Appalachian Wood
Рет қаралды 31 М.
STUPID EASY! DRY POUR CONCRETE! (DIY Concrete Slab or Walkway)
19:56
Pure Living for Life
Рет қаралды 132 М.
Dry pour concrete - can it work for a pier? 🤔
8:31
Appalachian Wood
Рет қаралды 17 М.
DRY POURING CONCRETE over EXISTING PATIO…What You Need To Know
20:32
Cajun Country Livin'
Рет қаралды 406 М.
Was I Wrong About Dry Pour? 🤔 (testing four weeks after pour)
3:48
Appalachian Wood
Рет қаралды 8 М.
I Need Your Help..
00:33
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 133 МЛН