It certainly can't handle 25,000 or even close, but for what it is (APS-C) the R7 can easily handle 3200, 4000 and even 5000 ISO. Not bad compared to even a few years ago. The added "reach" in decent light makes it a worthy tool to have in my opinion.

The only issue is when you're shooting Wildlife the autofocus has major issues. I've shot probably over a hundred thousand images on that camera. 16-hour days in the snow and the rain in the mud. Whether it's nasty out or beautiful the autofocus will go past the subject Ford Focus before the subject while you're using the focus tracking. Canon he's even admitted that it does have focusing issues. I know lots of Pros that have tried this camera and they have has myself very good days and very bad days especially compared to something like the Canon R5 or R6 or even R6 Mark ii. I also purchased the R8 which has a far superior auto focus than the Canon r7. The R7 is a good camera but if the autofocus was spot on like it was supposed to be in my top 5 cameras. I bought it specifically as a backup to my Canon R5 for the reach instead of using teleconverters. Now I'm just using my R5 with the 500 mm F4 and both teleconverters as well as the Canon R6 Mark II with the 100 to 500 for my wildlife. If I need to reach now I have to go to the teleconverters because I can't trust the autofocus on this camera. Duade Patton who is an Australian KZfaqr even called Canon out on this. They ADMITTED they have a flaw in the cameras auto focus and chaulked it up to its a cheap entry camera. But on the other hand the R8 has the exact same auto focus is the R6 Mark II and does a phenomenal job. I'm not saying the camera is useless as I do have a few videos on it. I'm just saying that some days you'll go out and only have a 20% success rate which is There are slight workarounds like not using electronic but instead using electronic first curtain and then instead of using the H++ just using the regular H+. I used it in the studio today for portraits with one of my strobes and got great results. It's a great camera.. Minus that ONE ISSUE that can be HUGE on dome days.

I want the R7 and I do sports 🏀 all kinds of events concerts .. my 90D is a crop sensor it does AMAZING AT NIGHT but your say the R7 doesn’t 😢😢

​@@ADivaForLifeI cans sell you mine. I don't use it anymore.

Can’t wait till the drop the R5ii

Glad it was helpful!

Glad it was helpful!

Glad I could help!

Thanks for being one of the 5 😅

Glad it was helpful!

You’re welcome! Glad I could help

No problem!

Hello! Noise is another term for grain in an image. The higher the ISO, the more grainy or noisy the image is lowering the overall quality.

Glad you enjoyed the video!

24mp is about the lowest resalution you can go and get a 60% crop at best, there's better but there is also worse. I still use a 24mp camera my self but I'm a casual birder so rarely do I crop.

@@David_Quinn_Photography, exactly! I've already tested the RP, SL3 and now the R8 and even using resources like Topaz All or Enhancement in Lightroom it didn't help in my case, I finish the edit with the same result as a Nikon P1000 that I have here, haha... sometimes even the P1000 wins because it hits the target very close with 16MP, I don't need to crop during editing, these other 24MP cameras end up at 4MP at most 6MP. Note: the best among the 24mp was the RP, I expected the R8 to have a better result but I was very wrong!

The R5C is an amazing compact cinema camera for more serious videographers with heavy video work and it also has the ability to take photos. The R6ii is a good hybrid if you do a like bit of both photo and video, nothing too heavy either way.

The $1,000 difference is only worth it if you do very heavy video work. Or if you do very specific type of photo work that involves heavy cropping or needing to print your photos very large.

@@Joel_Varughese I can only agree with you on cropping and making large prints. However R6ii is far more capable in video due to its faster processor. So a $1000 may not be worth it for most people.

@@YdkollI traded in my R6 last month. The reason, I’m expanding my passionate photography hobby to include birding and wildlife. The R6 or R6 II isn’t capable of giving me disable results. Especially in the area of cropping.

Actually the R5 and the R6 Mark II are about the same price now. Canon knocked the R5 down to $2899. Plus Mint used is $2200 all day.. same as the R6II

R6ii is a more budget friendly camera but with the R5ii coming out soon we might see price drops for the R5 soon!

@@Joel_Varughese в Росии сейчас r5 стоит 2 501

​​​@@vampire_1167в росии, в отличии от стран третьего мира эти камеры вообще не продаются официально, поэтому цена на серый импорт может быть любой и всем на это все равно. Снимайте на зенит или ломо

Thank you!