St Petersburg Ladies Trophy 2nd Round 31st January 2018
Пікірлер: 38
@njc84 Жыл бұрын
What's the commentator talking about? The out call came as she hit it. I don't think it affected her strike on the ball. She also challenged, lost it, so she lost the point twice essentially. I don't see what's to complain about.
@thebiglebrowski369511 ай бұрын
Umpires just like to screw Rybakina over.
@alexmay28259 ай бұрын
❗I think, what every player should learn from this is to always hit the ball back and *assume* that it was good.
@stevehughes1510 Жыл бұрын
It was called out as she hit it, her shot went into the net and the referee said the ball was in and hawkeye proved it was in, end of match, no beef about that.
@holymackenaw11 ай бұрын
years later and this rule hasnt changed for the better.
@alexmay28259 ай бұрын
Why should it change?
@co99717 ай бұрын
the problem is that garcia shouldnt have challenged the call.
@robertyyarzagaray483 Жыл бұрын
It is a problem, because ,refeere's in all sport's are given too much power, when player's are wrong they are punished what about when the refeere's are wrong are they punished ?
@cfr22142 жыл бұрын
So harsh on Garcia, how is that not hinderance.
@AnonYmous-ez4es2 жыл бұрын
No its not. The call was milliseconds AFTER she hit the ball into the net. Watch it again.
@aloof25 Жыл бұрын
@@AnonYmous-ez4es its not abt timings. It about how it affected th shot.
@funglip Жыл бұрын
@@aloof25 It's all about timing; since the call was after she hit the ball, it didn't affect the shot.
@KO-vv1oz Жыл бұрын
The call came when she hit it, no hinderance.
@einarsd4 Жыл бұрын
@@funglip It did affect her shot. You watch again. It was clear hindrance.
@deevictor1136 Жыл бұрын
A lot of human errors. That's why they introduced line technology.
@BenzeneHex5711 ай бұрын
She has a point.
@cfr22142 жыл бұрын
Who memba when Rybakina was Russian, I memba
@gerardocalabrese8425 Жыл бұрын
She is still russian ahahahah and always be
@b.h.7423 Жыл бұрын
Who remembers when Ukraine was Russian , I memba
@agkenshin1558 Жыл бұрын
Who remember the day ukraine support Israel to kill innocent Palestinian in their mosque.
@Straightforward786 Жыл бұрын
What is memba .. is it for remember?
@robertmartin75948 ай бұрын
@@Straightforward786I think it's Russian ??
@s.w.d40103 жыл бұрын
Garcia shouldn’t have challenged the call. If she didn’t challenge the call after the line person called it out, they would’ve had to replay the point. But she decided to challenge the call after the chair said it was good and that’s why she lost the point.
@richardhargraves5788 Жыл бұрын
I do not think you are right. The chair said it was good. Rybakina wins the point. The replay just confirmed the chair was right, and therefore Rybakina won the match. The chair said the out call came after Garcia hit the ball. No hindrance. Now, we need Hawkeye replayed with audio simultaneously played to determine if there indeed was a potential hindrance. Jmho.
@einarsd4 Жыл бұрын
@@richardhargraves5788 You are the one who isn't right. The call clearly affected Garcia's shot and point should have been replayed regardless of Garcia challenging the call.
@Jitesh108 Жыл бұрын
Maybe you are right. But Garcia was out of position even if she did somehow make that shot without the call, Rybakina would have put the ball away in the next shot for sure
@black_nebula Жыл бұрын
@@Jitesh108 a miss is possible
@Jitesh108 Жыл бұрын
@@black_nebula sure but Rybakina did have control of the point…
@alexmay28259 ай бұрын
❗The commentator had better invest in a new hearing aid and a new pair of glasses. The call did not affect García, the umpire's decision clearly was correct.
@cjdrv Жыл бұрын
Wow, it’s funny how the commentators are absolutely clueless when it comes to a sport they should know pretty well, since they’re commentating on it. This is just like the Radwanska match in Doha, where Nouni told her after her failed challenge, ”you cannot have two chances to win the point.“
@alasdairw Жыл бұрын
Radwanska was correct then, it wasn’t her fault the line judge made a mistake