Both her parents are Polish, athletes who came to Denmark in the 1980s, she has bravery in her genes!

Le mathe de rencontre

@@jeanclement9643 english please? ;

How much prize money was awarded to runner-up in the Australian Open 2018 Final?

@@ilebuekilau2550 ⁰⁰

100% agree unreal defense and counterattack

Halep is an amazing player

nobody calls them weak

@@outsidethepyramid Not weak. But they're referred to as pushers, which is a terrible generalization, especially for Simona. People think she just makes balls. She's an aggressive counterpuncher looking to turn defense to offense.

Objective criticism is a compound of positive and negative voices. A person is not ready to be athlete, no matter how talented that person is, if negative criticism can't be embraced.

@@magnetmac1 Constructive criticisms, but NOT flat out saying, "I don't like you," for no apparent reason other than pure bias. Yes, anyone can be bias, but not to a point where someone is literally being vicious and negative. Why do people even bother if they don't like? Makes no sense except to be negative like in a vicious way. Not everyone desires the same athlete, so why direct negative energies to that athlete? I don't like Lindsay Davenport, but I do appreciate her game, but I don't say something vicious online. I did criticized Davenport for being bias in her tennis commentary. Davenport's commentating to me is often unhelpful. Like the "Ooo, and ahhhhh." Like really?! I need to hear those commentaries? But I don't say, I hate Davenport or dislike her for no reason. Furthermore, if I hear Davenport commentating, then I just don't watch. Simple as that. But I don't need to go to that extra mile to create negative energies to deliver misery to someone. That's wrong in all levels. No one should cause misery to someone. If a person doesn't like to eat apples, then eat oranges. I don't care, just stop eating apples.

@@magnetmac1 Constructive criticisms are not negative if that person was not attacking that person directly. Constructive criticisms are comments such as change racquets, try a different string, try different string tensions, etc.

@@magnetmac1 And no one has the right to insinuate taking away endorsements, etc., just because a random person says so. Endorsements are not made by the fans and/or total strangers. Granted the fans can help endorsements but fans do NOT contribute to the terms of the contract. Often athletes are endorsed by a brand because that athlete stands for something. From inspiration to work ethics.

@@magnetmac1 And it is negativity that has caused sports journalists to advocate for age restrictions. That is why the WTA Tour is no longer dominated by teenagers. The days of Steffi Graf, Monica Seles, and Martina Hingis are gone. Had Serena Williams and Venus Williams been able to play without age restrictions perhaps they might have won more titles? Who knows. Serena might have already won 24 or more grand slam singles titles. I do have a problem with the age restrictions. I don't believe one athlete that being Jennifer Capriati should be the reason to spearhead the genesis of age restrictions. The negativity from fans, and the criticisms from journalists have finally made the WTA change their policy. Players are restricted from play by the number of tournaments players can participate until they reach 18 years of age. 17 and under are restricted to a limited amount of tournaments. That is unfortunate for we fans as female athletes hit their peak from 15 to 18. With 13, and 14 being their preparation years. Do we see 40 year old Olympic gymnasts being real contenders for gold? NO! Female Olympic figure skaters are often 15 or 16 to be real medal contenders; especially, with the quad jumps. So, are you happy now? Really? Because when Graf and Seles had their rivalry, it was some of the best Women's Tennis matches ever. Granted Seles was stabbed by a crazy fan, but there will never be a Seles ever again or a Martina Hingis as their best years were their teenage years. Even Steffi's calendar year Golden slam was won when Graf was a teenager.

no no she's gonna break the record don't worry

Serena is just too overwhelmed in finals. but she still remains the goat of women’s tennis. I think Margaret Court won so many AOs bcs players didn’t use to go in Australia

@sperrotta91 Well good for you, Wozniacki won, it doesn't matter if you can't stand her

Hey! Serena is living record. Don’t know what you are talking about. 23 Open Era Majors > anything else

Pot Pot of P Pl Porn P Pornographic

Pornp P

Totally agree about the classic matches taking the legs out of Halep. Especially against Angie, I do feel if she hadn't had a lapse at the end of the first set to give Angie 3 games to give her some hope, or converts the break points at 4-all in the second set, she wouldn't had to use up so much physical and emotional energy to win. That would have left her more fresh for the final. It's still amazing that with almost no energy, she still found a way to force a third set and went up the break at 4-3 before she finally seemed to hit the wall.

@@pomerlain8924 So without being pumped of energy in the semifinal she would have won the final? is that what you are saying? If so and FYI she just lost 6-0, 6-2 to CW in Singapore and so lost the last 3 matches between them. Haleps last win prior to the AO 2018 final was in 2015. Statistics don't win tennismatches I know but there was a trend

@sperrotta91 Simona was always in trouble when playing against Caroline. H2H is now 5:2 with Simonas last win back in 2015. Btw - "detesting" people us not healthy.

@sperrotta91 OK - wish you all the best and lots of love. You seem to need it

@sperrotta91 Oh that one? certainly not a very smart statement. Such statements happen in sports from time to time. How they are perceived by people is mostly dependent upon the recipient's bias - in your case it feeds your opinion of "notorious arrogance and poor sportsmanship" - others see it as unwise comment from a very frustrated top athlete But no - she should not have said that - even if it's true. Makarova never did very good in singles

that’s tennis for ya

she's a pusher, lol...you have no clue about tennis

@@thefridgeman her style of play is called counter puncher it's a term known in tennis dummy

She cheated anyway.

Because nobody loves their grunting but I love this ❤️ . I don't know why they hate grunting.

How was Caroline one of,the top players when at most Slams she only got to,the third round.

@@tennissir1986 WTA top-10 ranked players are considered world top players. You don't have to win a WTA title (let alone a Slam) to be among the world top tennis players.

@@magnetmac1 The main thing is - If Caroline had switched from her father as coach early on in her career she would have had a lot more slams.

@@tennissir1986 That's a hypothetical claim because you don't know that.

@@magnetmac1 No. whenever she got a new coach she played better