Even as a Protestant I never understood the idolization of MacArthur.

I love how Mr. MacArthur makes it sound like Baptists are unified but there are 15 or 20 different Baptist denominational in America alone. 241 baptist denominations around world.

I have to thank John MacArthur. He is one of the reasons I am converting to Catholicism. He played a big role. Thank you Mr. MacArthur!

I seriously can’t believe I used to be a Calvinist. Utter insanity

Its very simple: I have never heard of a single Catholic that has become a Protestant by reading the Church Fathers; but I have read of many Protestants that have become Catholic because they have read the Church Fathers.

What’s so sad about this is that some Catholics do not know the richness of their Faith so ithey become fertile ground for these heretics who give them an easy way out.

Fantastic rebuttal Trent! Former Calvinist MacArthur junky- now in full communion with the Church. No regrets.

So good, Trent!

I remember in my Protestant days the only information I got about the Catholic Church was by anti-Catholics. Once I actually looked into Catholicism and ALOT of it was by the help of the Catholic Answers podcast and articles you really see the beauty of THE Church

Mac Arthur and every other Calvinist cannot prove they were “predestined” to Heaven.

Mr. MacArthur.... Those that engage in obsessing about the sins of others are usually those most in need of repentance.

As a protestant and graduate of Fuller Theological Seminary with an MA in Biblical studies I was so persuaded by John MacArthur. I thought he came across as a Godly person. But I saw him in an interview one time where someone asked him when the Catholic Church went wrong and he said he didn't know exactly "maybe in the 3rd Century" he said. But that is when the Church was developing doctrines like the hypostatic union, the Trinity, the incarnation. They were also starting to discuss a possible canon of scripture. If they did something we cannot trust in the 3rd Century then how could we ever know what is true? Jesus set up a Church, the New Testament makes that clear but according to MacArthur it started to fail within 250 years or so? Thank you so much Trent for debunking MacArthur's gross misrepresentations. You were a large part in my coming to see the gross errors in Protestantism and coming home to the Catholic Church. I support your channels and encourage other Catholics to do the same. We need logical defenders of the Catholic faith like you (and David Anders, Matt Fradd, Jimmy Akin, and the great channel "How to be Christian." I think Trent and "How to be Christian" are the best channels to debunk Martin Luther and Protestant's claims. How to be Christian can be found here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fbR1jMxetcmzm5c.html&ab_channel=HowToBeChristian

Calvinism never made sense, even before I became Catholic.

Sometimes I wonder how Christendom was able to survive for 2000 years before men like MacArthur and Mike Winger came along to set us straight on the finer points of doctrine and dogma.

Double predestination and PST were always stumbling blocks for me as an evangelical. Grateful God drawing me home this year and for the glorious truth of the Catholic Church!

Ah, John MacArthur, I've never heard someone sound so sure of himself without giving one shred of evidence for their claims. Especially when all he makes appeals to sources that if actually observed would decimate his claims in under a minute. This is a great video.

MacArthur also claims that the Bible gives no support for Peter having been in Rome. Yet First Peter says he writes through Sylvanus from Babylon. Now MacArthur says Rome is Babylon, at least he does when he’s interpreting Revelations. Yet mysteriously and quite conveniently Babylon isn’t Rome in 1 Peter, that is, it isn’t for MacArthur. God bless. P.S that’s from a comment from ARE CATHOLICS SAVED by MacArthur. Edit: Macarthur claims there is no indication that Peter had anything to do with Rome (paraphrase) at the 1 hour mark of “Are Catholics Saved”

What’s sad, soooo many people listen to him and people like him about what Catholicism even is. I wish everyone would stop listening to non Catholics about what we believe... they ALWAYS get it wrong.

One of the most offensive things Macarthur says is that being a Catholic is a "damnable" belief- meaning he believes that all the Christians before the reformation are in hell.

Former Calvinist here. Getting baptized this and confirmed this weekend. Ready to have the Eucharist in my life

I am not a Catholic yet. John MacArthur lights a fire to get me to hurry up. How smug he is with self-appointed authority.

Excellent, l rejected McArthur directly. He thinks he is even more than a Protestant Pope.

So glad you decided to talk about MacArthur. As bad as Mike Winger is, at least he hasn't implied that Catholics are unsaved unlike MacArthur

This is a thorough and devastating counterattack on a man whose hatred of Catholicism has become a horrible spiritual blindness that has misled many others.

Thanks for this video. I used to always listen to MacArthur and even had his study Bible. But now after learning the history of the Church and reading the fathers I realize how wrong his anti-catholic rhetoric is. I'm soon converting to the Catholic Church.

MacArthur also doesnt allow “comments” on his KZfaq channel. He doesn’t welcome responses to his false claims. Trent, you should offer a public debate to MacArthur.

Very good Trent, finally you made it, this was so overdue!!!! by years...

John MacArthur is a good hater. Pray for him. Excellent rebuttal, Trent, using bedrock Catholic faith and teaching. Thank you. Pax Christi.

I used to follow John MacArthur because, despite being a protestant, he has some great insight on scripture. But his social media page posts are full of vitriol and untruths about Catholicism. And I'm talking about HIS posts, not his followers. I stopped following him after a while because it was so upsetting. It's one thing to disagree on Catholicism based on facts, another to spread lies.

As a former Calvinist, I always felt what Trent was saying about how a Calvinist could never be certain if he was ever really saved.

Calvinists are the chosen one, why bother with arguments? The case is closed...according to them, of course.

It's their rhetoric that needs dismantling. White, MacArthur, Winger, Durbin etc. are effective not because they're right but because they deliver their content with an emotive frankness that exudes an assurance and intellectual arrogance that to the ignorant will easily become convincing.

I’m so grateful that you did this rebuttal!!

Justin Martyr...has MacArthur not read Justin Martyr explaining the Mass? Anyways, thanks Trent. We know some folks that we love dearly that have been led astray by MacArthur.

I'm sorry, I know it's not very Christian of me, but when I hear someone that preaches such a heretical doctrine like Calvinism criticize apostolic Christianity, it makes my blood boil. These guys seem to think that Christianity was founded in 1519 by some European men and that the Bible descended miraculously, in the handwriting of God Himself, from heaven at the behest of King James. I really think their worship of the Bible could be interpreted as idolatry.

Thank you Trent! This is a testament as to why we need to continue to pray especially for those who condemn The Church.

I love the rebuttal videos so much!

He became his own pope in his own terms.

This was an awesome rebuttal you covered so much ground in this rebuttal. I am going to have to watch again and take notes. Thank you!

Come on John, you want to be Pope... Protestantism is the reason western society is so relative minded. I think it was Luther who proclaimed that every believer with a bible can be more doctrinally minded than the Pope, (i.e. be your own Pope/authority).

It's just amazing how for so many objections to Catholicism there is Biblical backing for the Catholic stance. True presence - John Chapter 6 Faith and works - letter of James

Thank you for this. As a Catholic I need God's grace to better understand all of this.

Blue Collar Catholic just did a video on him a couple day ago too! Glad to see people are confronting his errors

As Catholics, we always need to remember to ask Johnny Mack how that Thomas More Law Center worked out for him in his lawsuit against California.

Sadly this level of misinformation probably has basis in the spiritual realm. We must pray for them

John McArthur made me a better catholic. Being challenged by his teachings through Calvalry chapel I had to do my own research. I started going to bible study and grabbing any apologetics I could. He gets little credit in my book. 😊

Converted from Baptist to The Holy Catholic Church five years ago. Now my mission is to convert my Protestant brothers. I start by telling them everything they were taught about the Church is wrong, and I show them the actual teachings, and they have nothing to say against it. Truth defends itself. After that, they basically have a choice to make: stay inside their false belief, or answer the call to come to Holy Mother Church and be cleansed and purified through the Sacraments, including my favorite, Confession. Virgo Potens, protect us, your children!

Remember that one time John MacArthur denied the blood of Christ and that other time he said you can take the mark of the beast and still be saved? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

John McArthur is insufferable. Interestingly enough reading and listening to him helped me convert to Catholicism.

I feel like MacArthur would be the first person you’d meet at a Toyotathon

I’ve been waiting for something like this for a long time now. Thanks Trent!

This is what happens when you believe in your own doctrine and not one that has been around for over two thousand years.

Question: How can the Catholic Church possibly be the wrong history when the Protestantism didn’t appear till the Reformation?

Trent please! Where can i buy your books in spanish? The physical copies

They reject the infallibility of the Church yet preach in their own infallibility of their interpretation.

Boom.

For such a sharp guy on some matters of Scripture, it's astounding how much ignorance, dishonesty, and poor reasoning MacArthur uses when discussing the largest branch of Christianity.

Hey Trent, I’m interesting in getting your book on the papacy. Do you know any good books or articles against the anglicans church’s claim against the papacy and rome sending missionaries to England? Thanks! God bless.

Every sincere protestant looking for the truth, who reads the Church Fathers and the lives of the saints will become catholic automatically!!!! guaranteed

I couldn’t love this more Trent! Thank you for your work.

As Catholics we are charitable; perhaps charitable to a fault. John MacArthur version of the gospel is truly the stuff of nightmares. I had difficulty getting through this podcast. I was brought up this way, I can’t even describe how terrible that is for a child. These people do not need ecumenism; they need extreme pastoral correction from the successors of the apostles. 🤷🏻‍♀️

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:03 📺 Introduction to the response video and its purpose. 01:23 📜 Church history support: Church history doesn't universally back the Roman Catholic Church; diversity exists among church fathers' views. 03:37 🕊️ Calvinism vs. Catholicism: Catholicism aligns more closely with early church fathers than Calvinism on doctrines like eternal salvation and justification. 04:56 🔗 Baptist Successionism debunked: The theory that modern Baptists trace back to ancient heretical groups lacks historical credibility. 06:08 📚 Early church fathers' agreement: Church fathers' unanimous agreement on Catholic doctrine is not accurate; diversity in their views exists. 07:47 ⛪ Apostolic succession: The concept of apostolic succession isn't biblical; apostles had unique authority due to personal encounters with Jesus. 09:52 📖 Scripture's role: The Bible is seen as the ultimate authority in Protestantism, but its interpretation varies among denominations. 12:39 🧐 Circular reasoning: Both Catholics and Protestants have elements of circular reasoning in their arguments about authority and infallibility. 14:45 🏛️ Church authority: The Protestant emphasis on individual interpretation lacks unity, whereas the Catholic Church claims continuity and authority. 18:02 🌐 Church unity: Protestant denominational diversity raises questions about the lack of a unified structure and authority. 20:50 📜 Solo Scriptura: The doctrine of "sola scriptura" (Scripture alone) as the sole divine authority is challenged by historical context and interpretation. 23:51 🕊️ End of public revelation: The argument from Jude 3 doesn't definitively support the belief that public revelation ceased with the apostles. 24:04 📖 God's revelation didn't cease after apostles; no evidence for living apostles giving revelation. 25:02 🎁 Cessationism: Holy Spirit doesn't give miraculous gifts like in apostolic times. 26:13 🧩 Calvin questioned by Catholics about miracles supporting Reformation. 27:23 🔮 Continuationists: Spiritual gifts continue; potential risk of accepting continuing authority. 28:21 📜 Authority dispute: Scripture vs. Tradition; Protestants emphasize Sola Scriptura. 30:00 🕊️ Tradition's role: Not extra-biblical, but pharisaical misinterpretation. 32:24 📚 Sola Scriptura: Divine revelation in Scripture, not in man-made traditions. 34:12 🙏 Catholic approach: Mary as mediator, contrasts Calvinist God's determinism. 36:03 ⛪ Catholicism: Plea to saints and intermediaries; Calvinism's predestination. 38:52 🕊️ God's nature: Reconciliation and salvation offered to all, not just elect. 43:29 🕊️ Imputed righteousness: God's treatment of Jesus, not actual sin transfer. 45:10 🔥 Atonement models: Penal substitution vs. Sacrifice of love. 46:05 🕊️ Atonement interpretation: Incarnation as 'being made sin' in 2 Corinthians 5:21. 47:27 🕊️ Alternative view: Imputed sin refers to humanity's fallen nature. 47:56 🤨 Catholic interpretation of "made him to be sin" refers to Christ as a sin offering, compatible with Catholic understanding of atoning death. 48:49 🐑 Second Corinthians 5:21 aligns with Catholic view of Christ as a passover sacrifice, offering himself for humanity's sins. 49:20 🕊️ Second Corinthians 5:21 does not refute Catholic concept of Christ's atoning death; individuals must choose to accept its effects. 50:01 😇 Catholics don't need to wait until after death to find out if Christ's sacrifice applied to them; it's a settled fact in life. 50:57 🌟 Catholics believe in justification by grace, apprehended by faith; human actions don't contribute to salvation. 51:26 😳 Calvinist view leads to double predestination, where God decides both salvation and damnation; contrary to Catholic belief. 52:07 🤔 MacArthur's view on imputation and righteousness is inconsistent with Paul's use of different Greek words. 52:21 🙏 Catholic view: Christ's righteousness applied to believers through sacrifice, transforming them and making them pleasing to God. 52:48 🚶 Catholics believe in transformation through Christ's righteousness, leading to obedience and a new heart. 53:45 🛐 Catholic view of transformation aligns with God's promise in Ezekiel for a new heart and spirit. 54:54 🕊️ Jesus' full life and obedience were necessary, fulfilling righteousness and inaugurating his mission, not just for a weekend crucifixion. 56:04 😇 MacArthur misunderstands Catholic view; infused grace is not about multiple infusions, but about transformation and cooperation with God. 57:16 🤝 Catholics believe in cooperation with God's grace, not diminishing God's sovereignty; faith and works intertwined. 58:41 🏰 Misinterpretation of Catholic teaching on purgatory and works by MacArthur; salvation comes from Christ's sacrifice, not personal efforts. 59:53 😇 Both Catholics and Protestants emphasize the role of faith, but differ in the role of works in demonstrating and increasing faith. 01:00:08 👀 MacArthur's interpretation of James 2 is flawed; James talks about genuine faith being evidenced by works, not about earning salvation. 01:08:10 🕊️ Catholics and Protestants have overlapping concepts of justification, sanctification, and glorification, with differing emphases on process and cooperation. 01:11:33 🤨 MacArthur claims that Roman Catholic theology prevents people from being saved, as it involves cooperation with God's grace for salvation. 01:12:15 🧐 MacArthur's strict view could limit true Christians to only five-point Calvinists, which is unlikely. 01:12:57 😇 Many new Christians in their church are ex-Roman Catholics, drawn by their existing belief in the Trinity, Jesus' deity, salvation, and desire for heaven. 01:13:39 🌱 Roman Catholics are fertile ground for effective evangelism, and it's tragic to misrepresent them as Christians already in the kingdom. 01:14:08 🌐 It's beneficial for Catholics to understand biblical foundations to share their faith with Protestants and vice versa. 01:14:48 🌊 Baptism is a response to salvation and an act of obedience; it follows conversion, not a human work that produces conversion. 01:15:29 🔗 Water baptism symbolizes joining Christ's body, while spiritual baptism unites believers into the spiritual entity of the Church. 01:16:25 🤔 MacArthur's view of spiritual regeneration before faith leading to later inclusion in the body of Christ is questioned. 01:17:05 🌊 Baptismal regeneration is not just a Catholic belief; many Protestants and even Eastern Orthodox accept its importance. 01:17:31 📖 Romans 6 suggests water baptism as uniting believers with Christ's death and resurrection, indicating its centrality. 01:18:26 🤷‍♂️ MacArthur's arguments are summarized, highlighting the importance of understanding diverse Protestant theologies for Catholics.

When they line up before Saint Peter at the gates and call him not infact, The First Catholic Pope, but call him; "pedo", "satanic", "sinful", "evil", and "Pope" from the false judgemental words of their past and of their fathers and their fathers fathers before them, is the very reason to ask Mary to "pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen" Remember to pray the Rosary!

When I listen to John MacArthur, I see visions of a Protestant kiddie pool next to a Catholic ocean. Someone should tell Trent it isn't nice to take candy from babies.

Thanks for this video! I’ve been waiting for someone to tackle McArthur. I am hopeful you’ll do more videos on Jeff Durban, as well. I actually really enjoy his show on other matters (his discussions with atheists, Mormons, abortion supporters etc are excellent) but his errors are frustrating to say the least. God bless!

I'm so thankful that I left this group. I remember listening to my Sunday school teacher telling me that Baptists were the first Christians. He said that there was an unbroken line since 33 AD. He was either lying or ignorant.

Wow. McArthurs belief/teaching is scary 😨 freaky

Just came in to smash the like button: will watch the whole thing later

I'm so glad to see people standing up to this guy, John MacArthur and others, who can be at times ferociously anti-catholic. Even as a former protestant I would get irked in my spirit listening to his sermons and talks and I know others who did too. He not only goes after catholics but other protestants as well (charismatics, Billy Graham, Rick Warren, etc...). He seems to think he is God's watchdog and goes on the hunt and attacks. The man is entitled to his opinion as we do have freedom of religion but he seems to state things as though they were facts instead of merely his opinion. People seem to hang on to his words like he is the pope of the evangelicals. In my opinion, I find his views to be very narrow minded and he seems to take some things very literally in the bible. Thanks Trent for doing these videos. We need more people like you.

Calling John Macarthur a Theologian is like calling Weird Al-Yankovich a Philosopher

Whilst I am not RCC, nor do I foresee that happening. John MacArthur does not strike me as being Biblical in most of what he says, let alone even Christian. Listening to him makes as much sense as listening to a Mormon teach in Christianity...

So MacArthur says we don’t HAVE TO cooperate with grace because that would be “earning our salvation by works”... Then he goes on to say Catholics HAVE TO believe his interpretation of scripture, which wasn’t developed until the 1500s) to be saved. Calvinists don’t believe in infant baptism and believe you HAVE TO be able to reason and consent. The infant can’t receive the gift baptism without doing something. And why do Calvinists feel the need to tell us we’re damned if it’s out of our control!? ...That doesn’t seem very loving.

John MacArthur preaches Scripture alone! Jesus Christ in Holy Scripture, teaches the bread, WHEN BLESSED, is "My Body ". ( Matthew 26:26). John MacArthur says, "no, it is not Jesus's Body!" So much for Scripture alone! Why should anyone listen to the fallible John MacArthur, instead of going straight to the infallible Bible? Peace always in Jesus Christ our Great and Kind God and Savior, He whose Flesh is true food and Blood true drink

Bro, it is already very crazyness for me to be protestant for so long of my life, but imagine being a calvinist protestant! That's nuts!

You make a very good case Trent, I am struggling to remain a protestant after listening to your very well articulated arguments.

Great upload, Trent. I'm curious: about how long does it take to make one of your videos? How much time do you spend researching? Where do you go for your content? Would you be open to making a video showing your video-making process?

Great Video, Trent. I had LONGED for Trent to respond this liar

This verse alone refutes John MacArthur`s notions of salvation. Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. Philippians 2-12

Wow i am so glad you covered him!! I used to listen to him i cant believe you have done a show on him. Thank you!!!!

The problem with John MacArthur's arguments is he has statements accusing the Catholic Church yet, he does not give proofs.

“Christianity is not a thing of mere silence, but also of manifest greatness”. Ignatius of Antioch 107 AD. I’m not sure Mr MacArthur understands ancient Christianity.

It’s one thing to say that transubstantiation was made up in the Middle Ages. It’s another thing entirely to see the thing “transubstantiation” being described by St. Ignatius of Antioch who was a follower of St. John. There’s no “middle man” or many centuries to mess with that. Reading that saint made me convert.

All are Invited to the Wedding Banquet! Many refuse.

John MacArthur disputes the infallibility of the Catholic (Christ's) church and claims it's teachings are wrong i.e. fallible while at the same time claiming his teachings are correct and thus infallible. Oh the irony, and all from a teacher of doctrines that have been chopped and changed amongst the thousands of denominations since the time of Luther and Calvin. One would find it laughable if wasn't so sad. So, so sad :(

As of 2021, The net worth of John F. MacArthur is over $14 million. He has earned an annual salaried income of $160,000 for his services. John F. MacArthur earns as pastor-teacher for sermons for the Grace Community Church of Sun Valley, California.

Who found the Calvinist? who found the protestant? It started after Martin Luther which cause split after splits and splits.

Trent Horn: Can you provide the citation from Luther's opus where you got the "snow-covered dunghill" analogy? I've heard that this is an apocryphal saying, much like the ones you document attributed to Catholic saints.

Wonderful job as always

I'm actually grateful to John MacArthur for helping me to understand Protestantism. It's a bit round-about, so this will take some explanation. A typical discussion I've had with Protestants consists of them accusing Catholics of Pelagianism or Semi-Pelagianism, without using those terms explicitly. Since the Church proclaims these to be heresies, it's quite unlikely that the same Church would also be promoting them. I've gone over this ground with some people hundreds of times, discussed it, along with other Catholics, from every conceivable angle, but still the same people lob the same accusation. At this point there's no excuse for not knowing the accusation is false, so how can they justify bearing false witness? I came across an essay by MacArthur in which he stated that he could murder five people, die the next day, and still go to heaven. That seems counter-intuitive, since there would be no divine or temporal justice for his innocent victims. Where was he getting this? It turns out that Luther used the same example in regard to his idea of imputed righteousness. It was always clear to me that this doctrine is a license to sin, but various people who held it denied that. Not really surprising as people often hold logically contradictory ideas. But here was Luther admitting the truth of the matter, and apparently it wasn't just a quaint, obsolete Protestant belief as MacArthur was echoing it. Anyway, Luther followed the logic of his doctrine, and went on to say that it obviated the need for Christians to follow the Decalogue as well. So the admonition against bearing false witness was out the window, too, explaining why Protestants don't mind lying about what the Catholic Church actually teaches. Apparently, Luther also wrote advice to some of his protegés, on the basis of imputed righteousness, to "commit a few sins to shame the devil". Well, committing sins doesn't shame the devil, it's doing the devil's bidding, and advising someone to sin is a wicked thing to do. Imputed righteousness is clearly a false doctrine. Protestant lying about the Catholic faith is extensive. One of the sillier ones is by Thomas Horn, who wrote _Exo Vaticana_ , which puts forth the thesis that the Pope is in league with demons from outer space. It's surprising that anybody falls for this nonsense, but he put together a video accusing the Vatican Observatory on Mt. Graham in Arizona of naming its telescope "Lucifer". He interviewed some of the staff and highly edited the video to make an innocuous question and answer session seem somehow sinister. Well, it turns out that "Lucifer" wasn't the name of the telescope, but that of an imaging device in a different facility run by the Max Planck Institute. (It's since been renamed due to this slanderous accusation.) Horn was just outright lying; being in a different building entirely, this couldn't have been an honest mistake. So whenever some Protestant tells me I must leave the Catholic faith for Protestantism, apart from asking which of the thousand of sects I should join, I just remember all the lying, and the invented doctrinal justifications for it, and decline.

When I was a baby believer and an RC Sproul fan, I stayed away from John MacArthur. He gave me bad vibes. A decade later and having thoroughly studied multiple groups’ systematic theology, historical theology, and exegetical theology I am grateful that I did. MacArthur is a con artist. He masterfully mixes lies with truth, and it is truly unnerving to listen to the man.

I remember years ago watching some of MacArthur’s sermons when I was going through a young earth phase (I don’t really care for either, old and young earth still speak to the glory of God there’s better hills to die on) and I watched a few videos and his stuff didn’t really sit right with me. Watching this now explains why I didn’t like his stuff. I will say, something I’ve realized about the works thing between Catholics and Protestants… is that it’s literally something we should be doing anyway. Like technically MacArthur is right when he says that our works should be proving that we are Christian. Exactly! That’s what’s going on in Catholicism too. Yeah they connect it to our ongoing sanctification but they are literally things we should already be doing!! So praying, going to mass, taking the Eucharist, the Ten Commandments, the laws, confession, and everything, we should already be doing those things with a joyful heart! That obedience comes from a joyful heart. It only becomes legalistic when you make it legalistic in your heart. I hear Protestants complain about the venial and mortal sins and how it’s horrible how legalistic Catholicism is when they are literally already doing that in their own mindset of obedience and ongoing sanctification in Christ and trying to be like him! And then I’ve heard Catholics yell at Protestants for not fulfilling these things when in reality they are, just outside of communion with the Church! That’s something Catholics need to realize when talking to Protestants, when you’re talking about the different types of sins and indulgences, you have to tell them that it’s what they’re already doing but it’s to make us closer to Christ not to keep us out of purgatory. Because that’s what they hear most of the time, indulgences keep them out of purgatory when from my understanding purgatory is just cleansing you of the last pits of sin before you died because you don’t want to come before God in any state of sin. Otherwise they’ll think “well I already am trying to be more Christ like, I don’t need to go to mass and get *your* Eucharist.” Especially since many don’t believe in purgatory. Purgatory is the refining place that many Protestants sing about but only associate to the trials of life not the place they go before meeting the Father. It’s crazy, cuz as soon as I put two and two together as a Protestant going Catholic, everything literally made sense! Like it clicked for me!! So yeah. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk! God bless!

Thanks Trent..for rebutting this heretic.

This is great stuff! Thanks Trent!

So I wonder if John MacArthur would say that the Bible Answer Man, Hank Hannegraph is lost since he became an Orthodox Christian?

41:54 Did you misspeak here Trent? Is not that prayer from the chaplet of Divine Mercy? Or does it pedate St. Faustina?

Imagine unironically being Calvinist.

Thank you Trent! May God richly bless you and yours!

Quick side note: The time MacArthur got in front of his congregation and referred to their worship service as a "peaceful protest" was one of the funniest moments during the entire pandemic.

Hi Trent, would you like to have a go at a theological question I have, quite beyond my own learning. I am very perplexed by the scripture 'Do you not know that we will judge angels?' 1 Cor. 6v3. How is this to be since the medieval teaching of man's position on earth in the Economy of Grace and the Great Chain of Being which place us higher than the sub-moral animals and lower than the sinless angels, prima facie seem to preclude this? Anything you can contribute much appreciated.

Wow, how rich is our Catholic faith. Thank you, Jesus, for your church ⛪️