Seriously!!!

It's such a shame that the plaintiff bent her "no returns" rule for someone as derelict as the defendant.

How is she a thief if she returned it. She didn’t keep it. Ur comment is so weird

She’s certainly dressed like one

@@bobbleheadmoe it said no returns the plaintiff did her a favor. You’re weird for not seeing it

The defendant is a nasty B****.

I don't think she has any!

Buyer beware! Moral compass goes both ways, stop the shit!

I think it's rich that the defendant called her a scam artist when she charged back her card and waited for the plaintiff to contact her for a return. Had the plaintiff not done that, she would've kept the necklace AND the money. What a trash person!

The shooter stood firm with her no return policy and we wouldn't be here moron

Right !! I would’ve slapped her if I was her momma for being so ugh on tv

karma will get her

I don’t get why everyone is so upset at the defendant. She did everything she was supposed to do. Both the plaintiff and defendant got a note from the post office. Either the plaintiff is trying to double dip or the post office delivery person stole the item.

@@kevina3372 she wasn't allowed to return in the first place. I, and I believe a lot of other ppl are upset with the defendant because she called the plaintiff a "scammer" Basically if the defendant wouldn't have broken the rules by insisting on a refund and disputing the credit card charge than there wouldn't have been the opportunity for the post office to make the mistake.

What makes me furious, in addition to what you said, is the Judge is not picking up on the fact that it was July 4th. A US Federal Holiday, and USPS wouldn't be open, delivering packages or anything else.

@@terryfilkohazi2237 good point

All these cases teach me is nice guys really do finish last. I’m so mad for the seller.

Don't forget the defendant, she's most at fault here. Such a dirty person

She shouldn't of been allowed to dispute a credit card charge she willingly mad because she felt the necklace wasn't worth what she paid smh.

I do too…and this isn’t her first rodeo.

Yeah she probably dressed up as a USPS worker, delivered a fake package, forged a fake delivery notice, hacked into the USPS system, and planted fake evidence just to not have to return the necklace that she no longer wanted 🙃

She probably had buyers remorse and wanted money back so when she did she probably pawned the item and got payed twice

Dude, she had proof that the judge got a close up look at. She sent them. The only way she kept them is if she put something else in the package.

@@jedimasters1462 that’s actually a common scam for buyers and sellers. People will send a fake or broken version of something and they’ll have “proof of sending or return” to contest it, or sometimes a fake return will get sent to an address close to the seller so tracking will show it was delivered nearby and the seller will only have their word they didn’t receive something while the sender will have a small bit of proof they sent something, even if that proof is vague.

I’m right there with you!!!

There's been numerous ones just like her on court shows. Entitled and ridiculous 🙄

LITERALLYYYYY

I agree, this was disgusting! The plaintiff should have just sued the defendant from the very beginning instead of trying to be nice.

Can't wait to see!

I saw that too.. lol. Cute sweater.

​@@AmyLeeAngelLovenot even a seamstress would wear such an ugly sweater.

Love how you phrased that…100%!

From what it looks like she tried to come into court with that mask/ head scarf wrapped all over to disguise her. I'm glad they made her pull it down.

@@PR-by6eb It could be she is wearing it cause of her religious beliefs

@originaleverythingelseisca5977 If it was because of religious beliefs, they would've allowed her to keep it on.

The Defendant should truly be ashamed of herself. That’s really sad.☹️

I was looking for this comment cuz I love it too!

The plaintiffs jacket is hideous

Yeah that jacket is too cute!

I was in love with her hair! ❤

@@rutalaa you obviously didn't get it...🤷🏻‍♀️

Yes indeed!

Exactly! It broke my heart because she lost twice, and the judge couldn’t remedy it because her hands were tied.

And lazy. And a thief. And ridiculous. and Karma doesn't like ridiculous thieves.

Excuse me, @Missy Roy, who died and made you judge and jury. The defendant did not act like an entitled brat as you say. And no one called the Plaintiff a scam artist. The judge told the Plaintiff to go after the POST OFFICE. Please pay closer attention and use closed captioning, cause you do not hear so good. Repeat watch this episode and learn somthing.

@@trekgirl65 The defendant called the plaintiff a scam artist in the hallway when talking to Doug. She is entitled because she wanted her money back even when it was stated no refunds, saying it was too small, but there were many pictures that stated the size in a variety of ways. If she were a good person, she would have had more empathy for the plaintiff who is now out a lot of money.

@@trekgirl65 16:55 clearly YOU are the one who needs to pay attention.

@@trekgirl65 The defendant is *absolutely* an entitled brat. The plaintiff made it clear that all sales were final and there were no returns, but then after the defendant decided that she was above that policy and contested the credit card charge, and the plaintiff told her to just send the item back, she couldn't even bother to insure it, nor did she feel bad that the plaintiff was out both money AND the item... then, on top of that, she had the absolute gall to not only have no remorse for what happened, but to call the plaintiff a scam artist to boot. She is utterly despicable and thinks the world revolves around her.

Well stated!

Check yourself with your greasy eyeballs she shouldn't have returned policy upheld duh

Silly & evil you have a way with your words go watch General Hospital

@@Precise- right like... which is it?

Evil?? Ok... cut the dramatics 😂

Ikr I wanted her to lose 😼

Newark takes care of its own

Horrible verdict!

She seemed shady 😂

@@maryoaks3228 DEFINITELY SHADY. DUPERS DELIGHT WITH HER SMIRK AT THE END 😏

WOW-I love this! What a great story!!

I’m solly this happened to you

Ohhh I have sooo many Post office stories. Thwy are the WORST...and as a merchant myself, I often use UPS instead

Lol I would keep that forever, that is adorable. We don’t get apologies like that anymore. I could TOTALLY see me trying to write in Japanese before internet lol it would have been much worse lol.

Japanese are very good people.

I've done the same thing with charms; I think it's either much bigger or much smaller because of those tight, close up shots to show off as much detail as possible.

Sammeee i just take the L. That’s on me.

Because they drew a new contract. Once the plaintiff agreed to take it back the old policy was out. The new agreement was for the defendant to send it back and she did her part. Ir sucks but it’s the law.

I was thinking the same. I'm a mail carrier & I think whoever it was just didn't want to do holiday delivery. Even if the person isn't there, leave them a notice so this doesn't happen.

@@aimeeduhon3303 I happen to suspect the Defendant has a connect with someone who works for the PO, who saw an opportunity in the pandemic to profit financially, albeit imo, illegal. It's certainly immoral. And yes, I'm judging!😊😉

It was 2022! How long are they going to use the Covid excuse?!??! Ridiculous!

That’s what I was thinking. It’s a Government facility

Yes it is!! Why was that missed?

That's what I was thinking... Maybe the defendant had some sort of in with someone at the post office. Very fishy.

3rd party deliveries like fed ex are open everyday.... so just because it's a federal holiday means nothing....

@@erykahmv13 FedEx doesn't deliver USPS packages/mail

I agree

Nope. The post office stole it. I promise you that. I know, because they stole from me before

@akairi yahiko sometimes, those mail carriers can be shady and steal when opportunities come

And lucked out that the package never arrived? That doesn't make sense.

@@Doc_McStuffins it totally makes sense. Either way, she could blame the post office for the necklace missing. If it was delivered with the signature, and the plaintiff opened it up, and nothing was there, she would blame the post office. And because the post office didn’t get her signature, they can be blamed for that also. All she needed was a tracking number and that was it.

That's what I was thinking too. She should have ruled in the plaintiff's favor and then let the defendant go after the post office.

I'm wondering if the postal worker decided to keep it. They steal gift cards from the post and sometimes cash so it's not a far fetch.

Also takes no responsibility for understanding and accepting NO RETURNS. And gets by with that.

time to retire this judge, let her go home and yell at her husband

@@christopherchance4860 retire why? for making the correct legal decision?

@@christopherchance4860 LoL

@@christopherchance4860 ghehehe some comments out of the blue, this was a funny one.

@@christopherchance4860 After this ruling I tend to agree with you. Firstly, there is no mail delivery on July 4th in the USA. That date is a federal holiday, because it's the birthday of the United States. It's for that reason the case should have been decided in favor of the plaintiff. Miss Thang, the defendant, has "the plug" at the PO. She's a thief, and the simple testimony of the delivery date, or even the mailing date of July 4th makes all of the defendant's actions suspect. Geez, Marilyn! What in-the-judicial-proceedings is going on with those production assistants and paralegals on this show?? I vehemently disagree with this verdict.

What attitude. She barley spoke lol

@@bobbleheadmoe what she said at the end spoke volumes. Open your ears JACK! LOL

FJB. Exactly!

@@chrisdoherty6847 look at that’s poster’s name. They are a bobblehead like the defendant lol

Always how the world has been.

Except no proof since the package wasn't even delivered to the plaintiff.

and were they delivering mail on the 4th of July?

@@missj5191 sometimes they do. I’ve had USPS deliver on holidays before if they’re behind

Nope. The plaintiff asked for the necklace to be returned via USPS with a signature requirement and that’s exactly what the defendant did. Once the defendant handed the package to the post office, her responsibility to the plaintiff was complete

I agree seeing that the Post Office won’t give the plaintiff any info. The least the defendant can do is look into it for her. 🤦🏾‍♀️

@@lynne709 Yes. Again,JM is blatantly wrong. Let the Post Office address the issue.

That’s what I wanted, too! The post office had a contract with the defendant, right? Not the plaintiff. So wouldn’t she be the right one to go after them? I’m probably totally missing some part of the law, but it makes sense to me.🤣

Agreed. The post office definitely sucks more since covid....

But it's not the defendant's fault. What did the defendant do in the returning of the item that showed the lost package was their fault?

@@Fribee83 I agree. But it wasn’t the plaintiff’s fault either. It’s a really tough one. It just seems the defendant is the one who had a “contract” with the post office, not the plaintiff. And she would have a better chance to get money back from them. But I don’t know the law-not trying to say JM was wrong-just don’t get it and wish it would have gone a different way.

In mailing, it's a contract with basically all three in the sense the recipient is to get the letter or package. The one that failed the contract is the post office.

she has to rule in accordance with the law not her own moral feelings

I’m guessing she’s muslim

I think so also but it is not supposed to look like that but oh well

i think she is wearing it wrong, it's suppose to be a hijab i think she just messed up 🧕 < is how it's suppose to look 😂 it's annoying me too.

@@evonnawatford8054 yes i agree

Yes, plus the $30 fee from the bank for the reversals, plus her court filing costs.

Except her attire is What Not To Wear.....(wait a minute, maybe that makes sense 🤔 I've confused myself.....)

@@supportvawa2213 😂😂😂

How I miss that show!!

@@juliecranford534 me too! I never missed an episode.

@@mrshappilymarried1 Same here!!! It was the best!!

Unfortunately we do deliver packages everyday day except Christmas and Thanksgiving.

ALL SALES ARE FINAL God you're pathetically predictable 🙄 Another relative?? 🤣

@@jessicainhofe703 your mother should’ve swallowed you, twat ass pencil head bitch. Clearly the plaintiff is the one who told her to send it

Oh is this where you talk some low IQ smack and then delete it again? lol t-rash

Exactly! I think people are caught up on the way the defendant got her refund which was shady but that’s not the issue here. The issue is at fault for the missing package and she’s not

I thought the same thing. Defendant is shady.

I didn't think of that. Wow

The judge got a close up look at the paper. If it was fake, she did a very good job.

I see what you did there 😂📏

@@ACETHEEGR8 😅

Y’all don’t know the law and it shows she couldn’t have made it more clear. The defendant did what the plaintiff asked USPS dropped the ball. It was out of the defendants hands, now morally she was wrong but not legally

The contract was between the defendant and the plaintiff. They chose to use the post office as their third party to deliver this package to the plaintiff. The defendant held up her end by sending the package the exact way the plaintiff asked for it to be sent. When the defendant handed the package to the post office, her responsibility to the defendant ended.

I agree 💯. Plaintiff should of received her money then the defendant could sue the post office

The Plantiff had proof, the Post Office messed up but the Defendant was wrong for disputing!!! Either Postal Worker stole it or her neighbors!!

Lol. Dude you watch the case at all? That fact is never in question.

The post office should NOT be charging for signatures when they are not getting signatures. The purpose of getting a signature is to ensure the recipient has the package in hand -- not that it was just dropped off in their mailbox. There is too much mail theft out there, and that is the entire reason for wanting a signature. For USPS to charge for a service they are not providing is reprehensible. In addition, I believe the entire COVID thing is just an excuse for carriers to not have to spend the time to do their jobs properly. You can easily get a signature from someone without the risk of passing along COVID -- just wear a mask, stand a distance from them, and ask them to use their own pen. Wear gloves if you have to. But DO YOUR JOB! (I'm not implying your husband isn't doing his job; it's the higher-ups who made these asinine decisions who are to blame.) It's just infuriating that when you mail a package, they lie straight to your face telling you they'll be getting a signature when they won't.