Huzzah🎉

Imo it would be probably be the Stars Wars II Attack of Clones, The Phantom Meance, and the OG's

A great upload this is🍻

Favorite: 1) Revenge Of The Sith 2) The Empire Strikes Back 3) Rogue One Worst: 1) The Last Jedi 2) The Rise Of Skywalker 3) The Phantom Menace))

Top 3: Caravan of Courage, The battle for Endor, and The Christmas special. Bottom 3: See top 3.

I was ok with FA. R1 blew me away. TLJ is what killed me in the end. That's when I realized the people in charge had no idea what they were doing

I still love The Force Awakens. I may be one of the few but it still remains Disney Star Wars movie despite the sequel trilogy didn't work, but as solo movies I enjoyed all of them.

​@@alessandrodamiani1867 And yet that's why they don't work. It's like each movie was retconing the previous one.

Don't know why admiral akbar warned ALL OF US

Fa was good the other 2 were bad

They would have needed to have a plan for the trilogy to be able to lead to anything

That'll never happen under Disney, let alone Kennedy's regime

All we needed was her getting her own lightsaber at the beggining of episode 8 or 9 and make it that awesome double blade like we hoped for

It felt like it was building towards her embracing and using both sides to her advantage. That didn’t happen either.

@@WinkleAbiding Yeah. That's the HUGE problem I have with this trilogy, they had virtually no plan whatsoever or overall story with this trilogy and when you really think about it, it just gets worse and worse.

I think it’s the most stupidest idea ever put into Star Wars. The Holiday Special is one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen.

Palpatine: What is this… Life day non sense… Why are people afraid to say christmas!

Same... Not mentioning Rey's MAry Sue's character at all or how they treated Luke...

Not what he meant dude

@@danieldickson3215 D-Did you really just respond to a quote?

@@goodjob7745 D-Did you just pretend to stutter in KZfaq comments?

@@cdogthehedgehog6923 D-D-Do I care?

@@goodjob7745 D-D-Did I ask if you care?

@@cdogthehedgehog6923 At this point, you're either an adult living off the Stimulus and lazy AF or an edgy teenager. I'm done with you 🤣

Jar Jar was a sci fi minstrel show

honestly I would love to see that more

@@GStampedeIII "REEEYYYYSA! REEYYYYSA!"

“I’d rather drive with jake loyd”

Really? Funny as hell? Lol ok. How about be original? Why do you feel the need to repeat what was just said in your attention seeking?

yess

Yes

1-4 great, 5 garbage.

@@Phantron 4 was also garbage, don't kid yourself. 3 was bad, but not garbage like the last 2

@@4569packers nope, most of the characters in 4 are super entertaining

This was dumb. The reply was even worse.

@@LUCKO2022 you have a serious case of delusional.

It’s a side story, so they wanted to make it clear that was the case.

@@LUCKO2022 - You mean all 9 of them.

@@LUCKO2022 calling something a fact does not in fact make it a fact

That movie got me laid

That's a really good question. I guess the original is seen as so good that it doesn't quite meet the original scope of the channel - making fun of bad movies. Then again, he's had episodes featuring bad sequels to great movies from the start, so ... yeah, I agree with you there. What puzzles me the most is that he has never reviewed MacGyver. It was released during what the channel originally defined as the "cutoff period" of 1980-1997 or so, Doug has repeatedly talked about it off-hand so he knows what it's about, and the show *really* isn't as good as you might remember it to be. There even was a movie. It really was the sort of series someone else should remember so you wouldn't have to.

Yeah I’d be interested to see him review the sequels because I do think there’s some decent stuff there. The quadrilogy from Stone Of Cold Fire, Big Freeze, Journey to Big Water, and Great Longneck Migration is when the series had its best run outside the original. Time of the Great Giving is also another favorite of mine.

THEY HAVEN'T WHAAAT THEY SHOULLDDD

Marzgurl reviewed all 14 back in the days of TGWTG. That may be a factor in why it never crossed onto NC's desk.

Ikr everyone says prequels are bad I think sequels are way worse

me too.

I agree

@@knoffke_07 They are kinda bad, especially phantom menace, but I can at least stand to watch the movies and have a fun time watching it. I cannot say that about the sequels

@@KayamaKoomori Phantom Menace has Qui-gon, Young Obi-wan, Palpatine, Darth Maul, battle droids, and The pod race. The sequels have nothing that holds a candle to that stuff.

This comment is redundant and attention seeking.

So is your comment.

>__>

@@danieldickson3215 I thought it was better than all of episodes 7-9, but not Rogue one.

Maybe thats what this omnibus is for; his next StarWars related NC episode.

Unless they are willing to deepfake Harrison Ford into the movie, it is unworthy of critiquing. Even then the movie will still suck, but at least suck with the real Han Solo.

@@kamehameharem I thought 7 was better than Solo.

You know a trilogy is bad when people say the Prequels aren’t that bad 🤣

@@fireironthesecond2909 i always liked the prequels. They brought out so much content in comics in games, and eventually tv shows. The sequels can barely sell toys

That’s fair enough. I actually enjoyed the sequels.

For me it 1-6 and mando

I think those were largely there for against capital ships, to protect the hangars etc

@@sundhaug92 I’m talking about the trench sized ones

And yet it clearly DID mean something, because it worked.

@@Shadowkey392 only because a force user had outside help from a last second intervention (Han’s deus ex machina moment)

Small scale weaponry (also called point defense weapons) on a ship that size is pretty standard. Bigger weapons can't realign as quickly or accurately to track and shoot small, fast targets that can literally move like fleas on a dog.

Rouge leader standing by.

Do you like feeling like a pinball?

whether u like/dislike, agree/disagree Channel awesome is still a very entertaining reviewer.

I definitely do

Yeah the prequels were pretty lame except for the Revenge of the Sith in terms of dialogue and performances but at least it has established characters with actual arcs. There was a cohesive vision there albeit a flawed one. The sequel trilogy proved to be directionless and soulless there was nothing behind it beyond turn these films out make money.

How pathetic is it that someone only bothers appreciating the older movies because they've been giving something else to hate?

​@Dylan Sharp Back in the 2000s, Star Wars fans acted like the prequels were the worst movies ever made, and that they "rUinED" Star Wars. Fast forward to today, and now they're acting like the prequels were actually these "underrated jems" the whole time. It's not like Lucasfilm released a "Director's Cut" of the prequels or anything. They're still the exact same movies that they were 20 years ago.

@@Terminalsanity the star-wars prequels do not have a single character in them. no individual of them has any significant character trait that does not boil down to a profession or cooperation.

Where was the reference? Guess I missed it lol 😅

@@nerderonofficialwhen he says they only have 3 speed settings

In hindsight, that subtle reference is pretty funny. Especially after Rise of Skywalker, where they essentially do Indiana Jones, IN SPAAAACE! Which I actually didn’t mind. I like those sorts of stories, even when I get confused when I see a truck explode just by tipping over. (Seriously, how is that possible?)

Well it went from great to shit to ok, so thats an improvement.

@@Darkness1984 no it went from to great to ok to utter shit. No improvements

@@Darkness1984 It went from "fun" to "okay" to "dogshit".

I could pedantically point out that you could just make a custom playlist, but that doesn't cut out the charity shoutouts or sponsorships of the originals, and honestly, for some short series like this, it's often not worth the hassle of making the playlist, searching out the videos on the channel, adding them then deleting the playlist later. All of that to say, yea, agreed.

The thing that worked with Force Awakens is at the end it left a foundation to take the series in any direction... and then The Last Jedi wiped the slate clean again instead of building off of what was established, retroactively negating the most effective aspect of TFA. Which left TRoS having to desperately scrap together a climax out of 100% nostalgia with no narrative gas in the tank. Bottom line they needed to establish and stick to rough outline instead of winging it from film to film.

Rogue One and Mandalorian were the weak spots of recent years.

@@MediaLoverChris02 LOL, that's some grade A trolling.

@@Terminalsanity Those both gave us hauntingly bad CGI of beloved characters such as Luke, Leia and Tarkington. The characters from Rogue One are unmemorable and The Mandalorian has G*na C*rano in it.

@@MediaLoverChris02 I already congratulated your trolling you don't need to keep it up.

Also old Luke as soon as his sister is brought up : so you have chosen ... Death

@@Nebula2187 THANK YOUUUUU. Luke lost his damn mind and went full murder mode when vader brought up turning his sister to the dark side.

@@Nebula2187 Vader threatening to go after Leia is the same as Ben Solo literally sleeping in bed?

@@19kilo241 Luke had a vision of Ben threatening someone/thing he loved. Same level. Vader threatened someone Luke loved = murder mode. Vision of Ben legit murdering some folks and destroying what Luke loved = murder mode. reasonable. don't tell me you wouldn't react the same way Luke did. Like everyone goes on about how "oh I'd just TALK it out" but how many of us have DONE something BEFORE thinking it through THEN hella regretting it?

@@TheRibottoStudios Dude, this is Luke Post OT. He already experienced the lesson of not acting too hastily on future visions and even if he goes for the saber, which is batshit, it's your responsibility to alert your allies of your rogue student. Also, get up and help like a few months after instead of fucking off to die alone while the galaxy burns.

Solo and The Force Awakens where mediocre at least

What about The Mandalorian??? That was a great show!!!

It's mediocre at best and it was completely pointless. The opening crawl in A New Hope literally accomplished the same thing as Rogue One did.

@@killer92173 I said it was the only good "movie" , I agree with you mandolorian is great

@@okagron it was pointless to the continuity but it was a good movie. Not great but good

Wow, I haven’t seen THAT JOKE BEFORE.

@@rmn070 *smile* Okay.

Frankly, I'm in favor of a full re-making. Keep the actors that they can. Make competent stories. Give us all a good sequel trilogy.

The sequels made me realize that the prequels did one thing very right: Iconography. Have a look at any character, ship, or location from the prequels, and you can immediately tell "That's from the Star Wars prequels". In the sequel, everything looks and feels too much like the original trilogy, maybe with an extra stripe of red paint. There are Stormtroopers flying TIE fighters against "rebel" X-wings, there are AT-AT-like walkers, Star Destroyers, Imperial guards, Luke, Leia, Han ... but nothing that really looks original or new. Even the new characters had to share the screen with characters we already knew, giving less time to set up anybody. It's like the sequels leaned way too hard on the visual identity consumers were already familiar with, neglecting to make something unique for their own. Oh, and at least the prequels had some sort of overarching story that was thought out before they started filming.

@@Codraroll yes, and yes, 100% agree

You guys sound like victims of abuse arguing which of their beatings was more tolerable.

I guess being self-contained made it possible for the writers to create a script with a beginning, middle, and end, and then go back and fix things at the beginning if something didn't turn out right towards the end, and only start filming once it was written. The sequels had no overarching plan, and it shows. Episode 9 in particular was doomed from the onset. Episode 7 was too self-contained and didn't bother with a setup, and Episode 8 neglected what little setup there was, and left nothing to build upon. When you're building a house and the foundations are crooked, and the walls are even more crooked, the roof will also be crooked no matter what.

I've only seen it once and that was in theaters. I have ZERO desire to revisit it which is why it's gonna be hard to do those levels in Skywalker Saga and really the Disney Trilogy in general. I'll happily do TPM-ROTJ again though.

OH MY GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHD

So you have chosen death…

I don’t get it.

I like Rogue one expect the rest.

I like everything except rise

the force awakens was a mediocre mess with ham-handed and awkward fan homages and unoriginal story that pretty much undermined the OT.

@@medalgear654 Honestly, The Force Awakens is more watchable than the Prequels. Sure it took much from the Original Star Wars, but at least it didn’t have bad dialogue and political stuff.

@@BlazerK1914 I disagree, I think the force awakens is more forgettable and less watchable than the prequels. I would be lying if I say the prequels were great films but in spite of the bad dialogue(u should hear Riverdale's dialogue), outdated cgi , clunky writing and boring political stuff(actually the best part imo since it involves Palpatine's rise to power) which btw is still better than the intersectionality politics Disney tried to shove in the sequels especially the last jedi, it was still at least very original, showed an interesting world of Star Wars, no forced down awkward fan services, and deep down tell a fundamentally good story with the fall of the jedi, the rise of the Sith and Anakin's rise to power and fall to the dark side being an actually a good piece of character work. It also ends in a bloodbath in episode 3 where a lot of characters die, the heroes lose and the villain wins and is left with a bittersweet moment that one day a new hope with arise from the ashes of the fallen. The force awakens, like the rest of the sequels, was doomed from the start especially with the opening credits showing a terrible world building that basically sets the world back to ANH despite being a sequel. If this film were made by another studio it would automatically be reprimanded for plagiarism but I guess disney can get away with it.

Lol.... yeah

They actually already did. They have different names, but they’re (indirectly) responsible for just about everything in the OT, and it’s even funnier than you think.

There’s a comic series called TAG & BINK that did this. These two lovable idiots indirectly cause most of the Original Trilogy, and it’s even funnier than you’re imagining. The situations are actually explained well, so even though it’s obviously non-canon, it makes more sense than you would think, which makes it even funnier. Honestly it’s so good I would put in the TOP 10 OF STAT WARS ANYTHING.

No, I think the acting in the sequels is the best acting in Star Wars ever.

Yeah, the prequels are at least funny

I loved Rogue One. I think it was a realistic view on how the Rebels could actually beat the Empire. The original series implies being decent people will defeat evil people. Thars child like thinking. Which is what George was aiming at in the first place.

I like how grey they show the morality of the Rebels in it. That they have to do some bad things for the greater good. Ironically, Rogue One feels the most like a war movie out of all Star WARS movies.

Rogue One also made a really good show of how vulnerable the Rebels were. It showed they had the resources to fight a space battle, but only for a short while and only if everybody committed to it - and the Council was full of disagreeing voices. There was enough of a Rebel Alliance that Luke could join an established fighter wing, but you really got the impression that it was not much more than that either. Every ship counted, and the Empire had a comfortable upper hand. But still, the Empire had only one Death Star too, and it would be a major setback for them to lose it given the amount of resources was spent on it. The sequels didn't manage to create the same framework for the story. We never got the impression how strong the First Order were, or how many they were fighting, or what the rest of the Galaxy was thinking about their conquest. Losing Starkiller Base didn't seem to affect them in any meaningful way, nor losing a Dreadnought or Snoke or his flagship - they just carried on as usual as if their losses were irrelevant. That makes it harder to get a grasp of what the Rebels were trying to achieve or whether their effort made a difference. Imagine Lord of the Rings beginning with "Sauron had 172 Master Rings, and now the Fellowship is sent on a quest to destroy one of them. We don't know where the 171 others are". Doesn't make much of a difference whether they succeed or fail now, does it? Rogue One managed to convey and sell a story with believable stakes. The sequels ... really didn't.

@@Codraroll Just look at when we introduced to the main character in both films. We first see Jyn in a prison cell. She is dirty. Her will is broken. Her face conveys that she has been through a ton of horrible things in her life. Such as killing those who are innocent and being seriously taken advantage of. The greatness of that introduction is that I can go ahead and imagine whatever I want to have happened to her. The film leaves it to me to decide. But the film conveys very clearly that this little girl who is now an adult has seen and been in horrible things. Both to her and things that she's done to others. It is a perfect example of film showing us about a character rather than resorting to telling us about the character. If a film need not tell us, it shouldn't whenever it can simply show us instead. I don't need any backstory or voice over when we go from Jyn being a child to becoming an adult. The visuals tell me everything I need to know. Compare this to the fist image of Rey that we see. Rey is alone. However every hair on her head is perfectly placed like it would be for a princess. Her skin is untouchably perfect. Rey's body is perfect. Rey has a weapon and is well versed in using it. As good in it as a trained soldier would be. Then we are told that Rey is basically a slave or at best a share cropper...and what??? These two ideas conflict with each other. If Rey is a slave/sharecropper she wouldn't look like she does and she wouldn't be allowed to have a weapon she can use on whomever without suffering punishment. Her skin would be darkened significantly with a serious tan. she should be suffering serious skin damage as a result of so many sun burns (she's not Luke who has a a home, technology to live comfortably on his desert planet) She would be dirty as she lives in a desert with little water and she has no real home to speak of. She would be scrawny as I get up because she would barely have enough food to feed herself daily. But Rey has a perfectly toned body. You couldn't achieve that so easily as a slave/sharecropper. She is as white as Snow White. Which is impossible in a desert. So the images we see of the protagonist in each film is all the difference needed to tell which is a good film and which is a bad film. The appearance of the character has to fit their situation. In Rogue One it does perfectly. In Force Awakens it fails miserably. I believe in less than a second that Jyn has had a rough life. In no way does what I see in Rey fit what her life would be like if she really lived it. Consequently I don't believe in the universe in Force Awakens anywhere near as I do Rogue One. Believability is everything in sci fi. Good sci fi will make you believe its real. If if fails, it isn't good sci fi (if it was trying to be realistic).

@@akmal94ibrahim yes I agree. Rogue One shows how an inferior group of terrorists (not rebels!) would have to fight to defeat the Empire. The difference between terrorists and rebels is important in a film. Rebels only do good things to achieve a good ending. Terrorists would do anything to achieve their good ending. If the Rebels only did good things and behaved like Boy Scouts they would have been stomped out by the superior Empire in a heartbeat.

@@danieldickson3215 nope, the only thing disney has made that could even POSSIBLY even take place in the star wars universe, is "the mandalorian"

@@danieldickson3215 you would know, seeing as you are the one who's wrong.

The Last Jedi is what gave us RoS. Seriously That film was a narrative void: Snoke, Phasma, even Luke all thoughtlessly snuffed out to little narrative impact. Kylo and Hux reduced to bumbling jokes, Rey was rendered even more of a blank slate, Fin and Poe were left spinning in their wheels while the Resistance was literally going to have to rebuild from scratch. There almost no narrative forward momentum going into RoS. Contrast that with end of TESB where you had the setup Han Solo's rescue and and a final confrontation with Luke and Vader with a whole new context to consider. I mean I don't envy JJ having to salvage that shipwreck what could he do? Too late to make Kylo and Hux into credible villains, too late to make satisfying character arcs for Rey, Fin and Poe. All he could do is going back into the nostalgia well again but the good will that could bring in was spent in TFA. There was just so little to work with.

@@Terminalsanity Not necessarily. I think the blame goes more to Disney/Lucasfim's lack of confidence on Trevarrow's treatment for episode IX, a lot of ideas and concepts from his vision really fed off the Last Jedi. There weren't any real retcons, and even sounded like they were giving better ideas for concluding Rey's arc. They felt the backlash was too great from TLJ, that it really felt like they needed JJ for "damage control". It's a classic case of trying to please everybody, but ended up pleasing nobody. They should've just maintained the confidence to let Trevarrow take the helm - it certainly would've helped to the Sequels to truly feel like their own thing. Hell, we would've even got a major prequel/clone wars reference.

@@Bleh391 LOL the woefully incomplete Trevarrow script was pretty trash, lovecraftican Sith monsters, Hux and Kylo suddenly credible villains that work together? Rey ,Fin and Poe had no planned out arcs? Seems pretty much like it was similarly doomed just without the Palpatine blunder. Also you do known the primary reason they fired Trevarrow is because they didn't want Luke to be so integral to the story, that was the deal the breaker.

Yes, that is the problem with constantly throwing new Force Powers into the mix and just accepting that to be the norm, it opens up previously existing stuff to an infinite amount of "what if" questions, so you got to be extremely careful or you do dumb things like making your main character bring somebody back from the dead which was the entire reason for Anaking Skywalker to turn into Darth Vader and Rey can just nilly willy do that instinctively. Astral projection? sure why not... but over hundreds of lightyears? ...is the force faster than light now? does it connect things through hyperspace? ...Luke didn't even know where Rey flew off to... how did Luke end up on the right planet to begin with? Did he look for Leia through hyperspace force stuff? ...this is getting awfully stretchy the more i think about it.

It seemed less that he died from the strain as that he was subsumed or let himsellf be subsumed by the force. Maybe overusing the Force makes Jedis so zen that they sink into Nirvana or something. It would work as power limiter, for story telling perspective. Sith on the other hand having all sort weird powers which also turn them into disfigured abomination which are only keept alive by their refusal to die and in constant agony does also work in the same way. As for adding new Force powers, the good guys can do telekenesis and the bad guys can also throw lightning gets old after 30 years or so.

@@markusbarten455 Which is fair but then how did Yoda exist for so long? And a power limiter? We've seen people take down star destroyers from orbit [sith/jedi boi from force unleashed, vidya] We have had several dozen more times people doing pretty powerful things and, not get nom'd. It could be that. Luke just kind of died there- just a quick scene of the projection disappearing and him fading away i.e. Yoda. I don't mind new powers, I just want them to line up with the old ones- Hell I was all for basilia's jedi battle meditation. Because it worked well with the emperor having a constant influence on his empire much the same way. Or when Thrawn does it- Hell [apologies for the second curse] I'm more disapointed in what they did to luke- the wealth of things he did after, the jedi academy, dueling against thrawn- It just seems that they killed Luke to get rid of him rather than anything else- and they did it poorly. I wouldn't be against him dying in the movies admittedly but. You could have gotten a similar effect with a high tier hologram without needing to sacrifice luke sky walker- guy who regularly beat the shit out of worse odds in the comics, movies, games, books. While it's true that he's old- several key people in the pantheon are already insanely old and it seems jedi and sith age more like a wine than everyone else. Sorry for the wall of text, but in short- New powers? Fine, powers killing you? Sounds like a dark side power at best, a sort of lich deal maybe. It could just be that I enjoyed the books /etc because they had time to work it through than anything else however, but I can admit my bias in this.

@@nonya1366 You forget that Disney basically retconned almost everything after they bought the rights. Meaning that everyone involved in the sequels might've been told or downright ordered to literally ignore that and make up new shit (I am serious with that one). Instead of just stripe minnning, taking apart and putting back together like they did with the Marvel movies. I mean I heard about the original Thrawn or the Yuhza Vong but I haven't read those books so I'm less offended that they are gone. As for Luke, it is a shame that all we saw of his live was his biggest mistake and the broken wreck he was afterwards. Maybe they will give him his own CGI show, to have at least some adventures. I mean using series to fix the holes in the movies is kinda Star Wars thing now.

@@markusbarten455 I mean, heavily plagerize their own IP is on the table- ideas, scenarios, etc. Though that's where my bias lies. Honestly? The only take away from this is to read the thrawn series. If nothing else. It's the one sitting close to the heart of the matter- though I admit I am a fan of him enough that I watched rebels for him. It's worse seeing what Luke could be- Without spoilers, genuinely happy. Like. The actual good end. Yeah shows always seem to fix the holes.

The point is that it wouldn't have saved her from being blown out into the vacuum of space. Her lungs are collapsed, and the water in her body is vaporized. And unless TLJ was done filming and editing before they knew Carrie was gone, they should have let Leia die there.

@@hysuka2 Scientific estimates show human can last 15-90 seconds in space unprotected. And those are people without Force abilities. Also Star Wars isn't exactly known for its scientific accuracy, just look at the whole ship chasing physics argument in this same movie for further evidence of that. My point is, given this universe there is no reason Leia could not have learned to use the Force and thereby used it to move herself and survive.

It was corny/weird.. on top of what the other guy said & the logic he implemented. Knock it off

Total shite.

@@liamlb92 Apart from Rogue One.

@@theprototype2518 I’d take the fanbase created stories then the new trilogy any day.

Throne room fight. And maybe Hans death. But idk definitely doesn't hold a candle to the PT and OT

@@cdogthehedgehog6923 the throne room fight is total crap. You can clearly see in frame that a guy throws a spear before kylo ren kills him

Thanks for watching!!

agree'd rogue one is pretty good, as for the other 4 well just like the last airbender and DBZ evolution its best to pretend they dont exist

@@ryouma1717 Yeah and don't forget X-Men Origins Wolverine. Been doing that since the last jedi. Though I did hope rise of skywalker(first SW film I havent seen in theatres since childhood) would be at lest good but turned out worst.

@@medalgear654 Me too. I only recognize 6 episodes. Just like I don't recognize any Star Trek done after Enterprise as actual Star Trek. I didn't see Solo or last Jedi either in the theater. I do like Rogue One. It is the only prequel of anything I ever wanted to see. I always wanted to know how the Rebels got those plans. And I love how the whole fleet was destroyed getting them.

Lol he sometimes uploads new vids on a Sunday. 😂

not really new, just 4 old ones put into 1 video

@@A-Microwave Technically it’s still a new episode of nostalgia critic

I'm with you, mate.

This is your right, after all, I made same with prequel and now I appreciate both

@@sauvezlesbebesporgs5561 prequels are at least entertaining for how dumb they are. Pod racing, Darth Maul duel, Anakin jumping down throughout the city, clone wars, gladiator fight, space scene in the beginning of 3, Obi wan vs Anakin. Tons of great moments. Sequels are boring and political

@@hajime5486 totally subjective, you can think what you want but I least, even if prequel are more exciting, I find sequel very entertaining with a lot of crazy scenes too. And I don’t care if this is politicals, a lot of people like prequels because they are politicals so why sequel cannot do same thing (and do it better)

For me, it was a 6/10 at best. Underdeveloped and forgettable characters, a jumbled narrative with some odd editing choices, a slow pace that eventually builds to a sensational third act with amazing action, spectacle and a heart-pounding ending. Just because the last third was great doesn’t make up for the first two acts which were a bit of a slog.

Same in France let’s fucking go

@@darqqk4079 Every One in Europe : oh shit Here we go again …