👉🏽 Say hello to 1500 ELO 📈 chessvibescourses.thinkific.c... 😎 Play Chess Here: www.chess.com/membership?ref_... 👚 Merch: Chessvibes.shop Links are affiliate links and help support the Chess Vibes channel via a commission.
Пікірлер: 96
@bigl53435 ай бұрын
These bots are an insult to 1000-1200 players
@vermeirenniels34645 ай бұрын
Fr I'm so offended 😂
@Party-r8m5 ай бұрын
Same😭@@vermeirenniels3464
@AngRyGohan5 ай бұрын
Had a game at 700 elo yesterday where opponent got a 33 accuracy. I feel like that dude played better than Maria did contrary to the massive accuracy difference
@mcwolfbeast5 ай бұрын
We can't learn anything from this.
@jambott55205 ай бұрын
Seriously I am at like 400-500 blitz and people play better than these bots. Sure they will blunder some tactics very often but they won't just throw away pieces like the bots do.
@christopherwellman23645 ай бұрын
That's hilarious that Karpov hired a hypnotist to stare at his opponent. I don't think I'd even notice him.
@Faith-vl4lv5 ай бұрын
The bots are way easier than people at those ratings. Im only about a 900 elo and i beat bots up to 1600. Everything under 1500 is easy to beat even for a 900 such as myself
@gsctsnet24534 ай бұрын
Those accuracies CAN'T be accurate. Those bots are a joke, not even some 500 players sacrifice like that, it's just not how people blunder pieces!
@aaronmencher49784 ай бұрын
lol i just past 500 and i usually play bots in the 1200 ish range
@nikolaskasko64324 ай бұрын
1400 and I am 400 Elo😂😂
@billcook47685 ай бұрын
Times were different when I was young. As a beginner, the only response to e4 was e5. You had to earn the right to play something different, and even then you just got c5 as a choice. (And yes, we walked five miles to school. Uphill. Both ways.)
@Thete5 ай бұрын
The French and Caro-Kann against 1. e4 have always been sound at even the GM level.
@penguinymous65705 ай бұрын
Agree! Not only uphill but the wind was always in my face. Chess was more fun then too.
@DaDitka5 ай бұрын
And we had to walk in five feet of snow, with no shoes. Or pants...@penguinymous6570 (Lol)
@marisamusic115 ай бұрын
sometimes i play a 1000+ bot and the game analysis tells me they played like a 500. like that is not what i signed up for???
@togishere5 ай бұрын
I'm so glad my gambit finally gets recognition. I'm a 2200 and I play Duras. No joke, I have a 55% winrate (35% loss, 10% draw). It's such a good gambit.
@user-qm7ei6gx4n5 ай бұрын
Game 2 is like alien gambit
@danmurtaugh4415 ай бұрын
On an earlier video in the comments, I saw someone say that adding the time might make the bots play worse. Idk if that's true; I just know the bots don't normally play this poorly against me lol
@MrRabiddogg5 ай бұрын
I'm currently stuck at the 1200 bots. Maria is either super hard or super blunder depending on the day
@Benzzovic5 ай бұрын
Here is a petition for Martin that he will be a GM one day. 😔
@tianlecheng26565 ай бұрын
Signed
@DaDitka5 ай бұрын
@@tianlecheng2656Signed.
@adamkastler75385 ай бұрын
I think the bots are programmed to choose the best moves most of the time, and then throw in random blunders accorsing to their rating. Because I'm rated 1100 and I destroy the 1800-2000 bots half of the time bc of ridiculous mistakes
@evangeliel5 ай бұрын
yeah i think so too, the disparity between the level of bots that I can beat and the level of players that I can win against is very large! I wish the elo ratings were a bit more accurate
@cTc_PIKE5 ай бұрын
700 elo range between cpu and players
@erfanulhaque85045 ай бұрын
these bot accuracies are hilarious.
@kingrex19315 ай бұрын
As much as people complain about the lower level bots. players ranked 1200 and below blunder pieces a lot. It would be inaccurate to call a bot that never blunders a 1200 rated bot.
@BREAKocean5 ай бұрын
They do blunder pieces a lot but not the way the bot did. Everyone blunder pieces even up to 1500. But 1200's wouldn't typically use their knight to capture a pawn that is protected by a pawn for absolutely no reason, that's sub 1000. I coach kids and some of my students are 1000-1200 and they would never blunder the pieces the same way this bot did
@kingrex19315 ай бұрын
@@BREAKocean It's hard to make a game AI play like a human though. They are trying to emulate the general strength of a 1200 human.
@r0bz0rlyАй бұрын
Any chance of this one continuing? Good fun series 💙
@nelsonlopez12285 ай бұрын
Great video ❤
@bobdetrick67575 ай бұрын
really enjoyed that … looked like so many of my games
@ScarletDeathweaverLegacy5 ай бұрын
12:18 After h3+ f-Kh4, Rf4+ f-gxf4, Bf6# is checkmate and white wins (as white should here)
@NJDJ19865 ай бұрын
@18:39 theres a lot of trading pieces happening in the middle to end game!
@TomBarrister5 ай бұрын
Won three games and lost 12 points.
@Qoko885 ай бұрын
It's interesting that the Cochrane is still not fully solved; indeed, pretty much all sensible moves are playable for both sides and Black looks at an advantage of a little less than +1. Sure, it's dubious because it gives Black the advantage on move 4, but no pain no gain I'd say. White will have to keep pressure up and Black will look at securing the king, and if either slips up one of these tasks too much the other side will win.
@OfficerRL785 ай бұрын
I'm stuck at Li, the 2000 Elo Bot
@iamR4li5 ай бұрын
10:33 - missed Qxb8 then check with rook, bishop is protecting our rook and queen falls.
@thomasgrabowski22025 ай бұрын
I'm going to buy your program :P ! I need to get better lol
@jgoemat5 ай бұрын
11:11 - why not take with the rook? It doesn't put the queen under immediate attack, but I don't see how the queen could be used immediately. The only check gives away the queen. Could move to the white diagonal to setup a checkmate threat, but then you just take the bishop with the rook and place the black king in check. You could lose your bishop to the king, but would gain their bishop.
@qwksilver51505 ай бұрын
Been playing the Cochrane gambit for years. Too bad the bot was so bad. Nelson, you should a series or a video or 2 on unknown gambits.
@Senguh5 ай бұрын
Video idea: You are only allowed to calculate the next 2 moves of your opponent. Maybe even in this series or a seperate video.
@gb55405 ай бұрын
19:00 best advice anyone can give. having lost lot of games than could have been easy wins once you start doing this it won't happen again. More pieces means more tactics your opponent can come up with that wins them a game they would have lost.
@erfanulhaque85045 ай бұрын
I probably never blundered like these 1200 rated bots in my life.
@user-yu3qv7yw2e5 ай бұрын
9:25 after your queen took the rook, could black have trapped your queen with bishop to b7? And if so, wouldn't getting a rook and bishop (if you got trapped) not quite be worth losing the queen?
@enderyu5 ай бұрын
If Bb7 then the knight is undefended, and there is no discovery to win the queen. Bd6 was probably the bot's desperate attempt to defend the knight to trap the white queen
@patters20375 ай бұрын
I thought the same thing, but he had be3
@aperson37875 ай бұрын
Also Black is just 1 move too slow, Bb7 does not have a defended knight as queen cuts contact and the black bishop is not defending yet
@emmettobrian18745 ай бұрын
I've read that bot rating is like 400 points higher than they should be and it kinda makes sense. That would put these at 800.
@Aphixx5 ай бұрын
Still kinda embarrassing for an 800
@emmettobrian18745 ай бұрын
@@Aphixx I'm 8-900 in rapid and some days feel like that
@cTc_PIKE5 ай бұрын
it’s a 700* difference
@emmettobrian18745 ай бұрын
@@cTc_PIKE that will be interesting to see play out in this rating climb. At what point will Nelson start losing 50% of the games? I hope he keeps going after the 2200 rated bots
@jefftaylor11865 ай бұрын
Gow’ron Gambit > Duras Gambit
@vladislavshevchenko6345 ай бұрын
I'm 1500 I love playing e5, Nc6, f5 against most e4 openings. If I get to Rousseau gambit or the Winawer gambit, either declined, accepted of the counter gambit, I feel very comfortable and confident
@chess62085 ай бұрын
I tried what the thumbnail showed without knowing what it is
@baronvonlobotomus75305 ай бұрын
did not en passant at 4:40, video ruined
@pepanovakno5 ай бұрын
at 8:11 Nelson didnt take en passant too
@Zarith74805 ай бұрын
I love duras gambit
@Milindsbarve5 ай бұрын
On which channel story of fishermen is on.
@TymexComputing5 ай бұрын
Hi, thank you
@MysteryKoshka4 ай бұрын
I’m missing the ELO climb 😢
@cyck4605 ай бұрын
11:50 I’m pretty sure there was checkmate in 2 here
@James--Parker5 ай бұрын
As a 1200 I am a little offended that this boss is the representation of 1200s.
@gavinfullen42824 ай бұрын
take queen. TAKE THE QUEEN....dang it!
@christianfrost86605 ай бұрын
I am beginning to think that Martin is the second hardest bot behind Mittens.
@thomasyogayoiii37595 ай бұрын
Effectivement
@charlesglidden5575 ай бұрын
Title is why F5 is so bad. It should be don't give away a night for a pawn.
@danibeck37714 ай бұрын
I hate the way bots play. They play perfect moves but just completely blunder every once in a while for no reason. Its so annoying. You'd think a site with a massive database of all the moves that people play would be able to make them play more like real people, at least for the openings
@petersmythe64625 ай бұрын
The bots are way below their ratings. I could completely wreck Nelson and I got a draw against Catspurrov when I was 600. Those are supposedly 1300 and 1400-rated bots. They should be drawing me once every 40 games and winning the remaining 39.
@petersmythe64625 ай бұрын
And even a 100 would beat Martin nearly every game. All they need to do is avoid blundering M1.
@TechnoMageB55 ай бұрын
Duras Gambit? What is this, Klingon chess?
@theyuha5 ай бұрын
I played a 1300 bot and they are not good enough to beat a 750 player.
@BookofYAH7775 ай бұрын
The video title is misleading. You say "why f5 is so bad", yet you play f5 and win, and thus conclude the opposite in the video than you do in the title
@gb55405 ай бұрын
Now it makes sense why i can beat upto 1800 bots easily they have truly became trash i thought i improved 💀😭😂😭😂😭😂
@ThunderboxMusic5 ай бұрын
As far as I can tell all the bots are overrated. I’m a 1300 and I can beat Antonio relatively consistently. I’ve also played Isabel and find that she blundered her queen to a pin (I went on to beat her)
@B-RaD5oh54 ай бұрын
What happened to this series :(
@MsNosis5 ай бұрын
don't accuse the bots of being stupid! I used to be around ELO 1000, now I am regularly beating bots on 1200-1400 :D
@cloudy84855 ай бұрын
you are obviously lying, im at 700 elo already beating 1600-1700 elo bots
@maxb56405 ай бұрын
650 elo atm. Maria is easy, and 1300 bot also blunders a lot. But 1400 beats me more than I beat him. The game elo is rarely above 1000 in analysis though
@cTc_PIKE5 ай бұрын
cpu elos and player elos is a 700 difference
@cTc_PIKE5 ай бұрын
1200 cpu is a 500 player. 1500 cpu is an 800 player. 1700 is 1000
@maxb56405 ай бұрын
@@cTc_PIKE Good explanation. Now all makes sense
@johnholmes-vw4zj5 ай бұрын
Shouldn’t you be playing as Peter? Your rating isn’t climbing.