Citizens United v. F.E.C. AP Gov (OLD)

Рет қаралды 53,251

3 жыл бұрын

Watch the new and improved Citizens United v. F.E.C. video here!
• AP Gov | Citizens Unit...
Check out the AP Gov Ultimate Review Packet: www.ultimatereviewpacket.com/...
Tik Tok @ LaMoneyProductions

Пікірлер: 55

@aaronkintzer3943 3 жыл бұрын

I feel like every supreme court ruling like these are just them saying "i mean yeah i guess technicallyyyyyyy" "yeah that sounds about right" "Well if we use the definition of ____ it technically means hes all good" "i mean fair enoughhhhhh"

@xThanya 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for all these videos! I'm doing last-minute studying and binge-watching everything. My ap test is 4 days and I'm feeling a little better about the court cases so thank you so much!

@vecvecvec 3 жыл бұрын

same lmao,, gl on the test!!

@xThanya 3 жыл бұрын

@@vecvecvec Thanks, you too!

@leggo3213 Жыл бұрын

Mine is in 12 hours…🥲

@isotaan 3 жыл бұрын

There's an important turning point that this video doesn't mention: At oral arguments, the government's attorney stepped in front of the Supreme Court and said that the government could ban the publication of political books. That was the turning point in this case. It caused a backlash among conservatives on the Court, which in turn led to the conservatives wanting to strike down BCRA. It caused the case to be re-argued the following year, and it concluded with big parts of BCRA struck down.

@CareyLaManna 3 жыл бұрын

That's true. He was responding directly to a question from a Justice, though. It was an tactical question and the attorney took the bait and walked right into the trap.

@isotaan 3 жыл бұрын

@@CareyLaManna There is a saying: You can't win a case at oral arguments, but you can always lose one. The Deputy Solicitor General certainly lost Citizens United that day.

@sarahlerner276 3 жыл бұрын

So helpful!!

@natebirdsong3134 3 жыл бұрын

Great Video Lamoney!

@Milan-ld7rs 3 жыл бұрын

2:20 damn thats some foreshadowing

@jacobhoang8754 3 жыл бұрын

Another amazing video like usual

@sifabutcher380 3 жыл бұрын

Look forward to these!

@daniellalopez8528 3 жыл бұрын

Learning more everyday!

@jonboxleitner7354 3 жыл бұрын

Saying it's "not about free speech" doesn't make it "not about free speech."

@ashleycorrea5585 3 жыл бұрын

such a helpful video to review content quickly

@autumnpalmer8654 3 жыл бұрын

i have an exam on this tmr so thank you!

@CareyLaManna 3 жыл бұрын

I got you, ms jackson, wooooo!

@autumnpalmer8654 3 жыл бұрын

@Saisidharth Seyyadri aw hey sai

@movalex9713 3 жыл бұрын

did you pass?

@bryannaramirez1917 3 жыл бұрын

thank you!!

@jennakleinman2988 3 жыл бұрын

Best form of review no doubt

@zacharymarks1196 3 жыл бұрын

Quality Content!

@janinedowns391 3 жыл бұрын

great video!

@miriamgoodwin7380 3 жыл бұрын

awesome video !

@alexadeus9616 3 жыл бұрын

Never really knew fully about this case, but it’s really interesting! thank you !

@condeandrew5745 3 жыл бұрын

liking your new beard!

@carolinamartin98 3 жыл бұрын

well explained

@nicolasgiovine6642 3 жыл бұрын

Ok now this is epic

@alexandracurtu1012 3 жыл бұрын

Got the AP exam tomorrow, I'm binging all your document/court case videos rn!!

@helenavila8656 2 жыл бұрын

what'd u get?

@alexandracurtu1012 2 жыл бұрын

@@helenavila8656 a 5! These videos are extremely helpful definitely reccomend

@diegoochoa6475 3 жыл бұрын

godly content

@robhommy 3 жыл бұрын

This was on my yt suggested page what’s up lamoney

@CareyLaManna 3 жыл бұрын

Ayy what up kid. Load management forever

@lashaundawatson6977 3 жыл бұрын

post notifications stay on 🙏

@juliashipman6533 3 жыл бұрын

Love the review content

@clari13 3 жыл бұрын

nice

@zoeyvarela7127 3 жыл бұрын

👍

@williamkern6842 3 жыл бұрын

Yo LaMonney would you say this applies or connects to any other cases??

@CareyLaManna 3 жыл бұрын

You can connect it to other speech or campaign finance cases. A few famous campaign finance cases: Buckley v Valeo, McCutheon v. FEC, McConnell v. FEC are just three that immediately come to mind

@supersonic2778 3 жыл бұрын

BCRA time

@jasmeenfajardo-lopez8382 3 жыл бұрын

I peep the lost series in the bottom right :)

@CareyLaManna 3 жыл бұрын

yassssss

@aldovega8961 3 жыл бұрын

Free Yak

@jessicaha1100 3 жыл бұрын

epic

@mayomonkey1639 2 жыл бұрын

Movies condemning Republicans good. Movies condemning Democrats bad.

@MaddieMadness 2 жыл бұрын

You're actually simple enough to fall for the D v R trap. LMAO You probably support a party. hahahahahaha No such thing as a smart republican or a smart democrat supporter!

@angelaa7445 2 жыл бұрын

Individual film maker vs corporation This isn’t about who is being criticized, it’s about who is doing the criticism

@andresgaravito2444 3 жыл бұрын

Citizens United 1 - 0 Hillary Clinton

@AdamSmith-gs2dv 3 жыл бұрын

The court ruled right in this case. Come on guys if they ruled the other way the government could limit group political speech and do you really want that? Yes it has the negative side effect of corps being considered groups of people and thus they have free speech rights (ie the ability to spend money on ads) but is the other way any better? That the government can limit a groups right to free speech? That's sounds awful and something nations like China does. Remember this ruling doesn't just apply to corps it applies to ALL groups such as Labor Unions and Joe and Jane's campaign association. Sorry for the rant I just HATE how this ruling is viewed as "corps are people hurr durr" and people don't look at the broader question being asked

@kevinsean1614 3 жыл бұрын

so much free speech that no individual wa actually given free speech. Just that corporations can now support political figure at the expense of dirty irrelevant peasants (poor people EWW)