Denser cities are extremely problematic. Take a look at NYC and LA. Both have massive issues with homelessness, violent and traffic congestion. Humans being packed in next to each other so tightly is not good for a lot of reasons. This is the same philosophy the Soviet system used in a lot of their cities, and it was a proven failure.

@@Astrobucks2 LA is much less dense on average than NYC and has a reputation for worse traffic. Curious

@@eclogite NYC unlike LA has a robust mass public transportation system. Hence the traffic in LA.

Suburbs put a ton of financial strain on the cities they surround. Suburban sprawl is a financial death wish for the major cities that support them. Dallas and Houston are great examples

@@Astrobucks2 those cities are among the least violent large cities in the U.S. actually - and their homelessness issues stem from insufficient housing, not too much density. I urge you to study anything at all about urban planning before trying to comment on it.

booo! "little to no people" aka: people you don't care about or that aren't valued by our corporate system. Those places that seemed empty to you had people living there that couldn't afford to live elsewhere. I lived in the Eastern Market for 10 years, paying $750 a month for a place that could fit up to 5 people sharing the costs. Then I got gentrified out by Sanford Nelson. He bought up as much as he could with all of these ambitious plans, none of them have materialized and now they're just doing a flip on all the properties at a big profit. Many of the places that people got kicked out of 5 years ago haven't been occupied since! So the occupancy rate has gone down while the prices have gone up...

Gentrifying an area should be seen as a desirable thing that brings benefits but there is a peculiar form of snobbery that would prefer to see areas run down as being more desirable

@@amblincork If the people living in run down areas could afford to stay in those areas as they got nicer and more developed, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. That's not what gentrification is. The question is who benefits from development, and to what audience does that gentrification cater to? It's not the poor people who already live there. Saying gentrification should been seen as desirable is another way of saying "I don't care about poor people. They are not desirable."

@@MCAndyTWhy should anyone care about the poor? I’m sick of that attitude. People are poor because they made bad life choices, or were dealt a bad hand in life. Either way, they didn’t develop the skills for success. Somebody sees an opportunity to turn a $hit hole into a nice place and suddenly everyone cries for the poor who are displaced. Cry me a river. If the poor picked up a paintbrush or took pride in their neighborhood and exerted some modicum of effort to make their neighborhood a place that was desirable to live, they would make theirselves rich, and the opportunity for someone else to come in and do the same wouldn’t exist. There is a class that seeks to make things better and looks for opportunities to do that. And they get rich along the way. And there is another class that is lazy and wants to complain about everything and would rather live in squalor than lift a finger to change their predicament. Both classes deserve what they get. Nobody ever gave me $hit. I worked hard in college. Then worked hard in my career. Despite that, living in a high cost of living area, I couldn’t afford a house until the crash during the financial crisis, and even then I could only afford the bottom of the barrel. So I bought the worst house in a decent neighborhood, and spent nights and weekends turning it into the nicest one on the block. It’s called sweat equity. You get out of life what you put into it.

@@MCAndyT I have grown tired of the pseudo socialist babble about these areas - I used to live in one and now the areas has jobs, offices, homes and is the better for it

Because that would spoil their agenda. The last time Detroit had a Republican mayor was in 1962. There is no single person to blame. Crime, high taxes and car insurance, jobs leaving the city, decades of corruption and greed, what have you. For all intents and purposes, Detroit was doomed from the very beginning, by investing solely in auto manufacturing and little else. Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Not saying the city cannot be brought back to its glory days, but as long as the people keep voting for the same policies that led the downfall in the first place, the city is a lost cause.

Positivity!

Trump pardoned the convicted former mayor of Detroit who was serving a decades long sentence in federal prison for corruption, for no apparent reason whatsoever. I wonder why Trump would help a convicted criminal who never gave back the millions he embezzled, out of jail decades early.

It’s the roads fault

yeah the curruption of mayors and city officials dating back to the 1910's, especially those paid by the local orginized crime gangs like the purple gang and the italian mob.

Crime and broke cities.

I think the idea of what’s futuristic differs. European cities are old and by nature they had narrow streets which forced them to build rail lines and mass transit but the advantage is that walkability is optimal and they have really nice urban spaces that foster communal living. Whereas here in the us futurism is seen as building individual spaces with the latest technology which is why you see many single family units(prolly more than any place in the world) with better built homes but that comes at the cost of walkability(I have found that US homes on average have much better facilities than their European counterparts with some exceptions). Owning a car is much easier here in the US. But I see change happening. We are building more public transit than in the last 40 years with more intercity rail projects also on the horizon. Walkable cities are gaining traction with cities like Minneapolis, DC, Chicago. Santa Monica, New York doing amazing work with road closures, cycling infrastructure, transit oriented development and the movement is gaining traction in places like Houston m Austin too. Things are only going to go up so be optimistic.

​@@portcybertryx222The main difference between walkable cities in europe and cities in the us is that, even though there were plans for pretty much every city to tear down streets and buildings in order to build highways and parking places everywhere, many european cities dismissed them (look at Amsterdam its quite famous for that) US cities used to be walkable and had streetcars and all that good stuff but they had to go once cars got trendy

@@Manni4 yup very very true indeed. But tbf the streetcar network that the US had before was antiquated anyway and was a limiter to development in many cases. But in any case they should never have torn those down and modernised some important lines (which is what cities like LA are doing now). The worst part was demolishing cohesive neighbourhoods for building freeways and a real lost opportunity of converting the streetcar rights of way into exclusive bus lanes.

It's crime and the lack of law enforcement. No one wants to live in an unsafe area, no one cognizant anyway. Look at the mass exodus happening in NYC; is that because of cars?

Pittsburgh too-

The people loved their street cars that always ran on time. Busses never ran on time.

It's because you insist on driving everywhere instead of developing local economies

@@evionlast I cycle actually.

Crime is a huge factor as are failing schools and family structures. People move out of declining inner cities because of declining life styles. As more properties become more run down and eventually abandoned tax revenues decline accelerating raising taxes and more properties being abandoned. HUD regulations do not help because of rules requiring full payment of money owed on sale or complete abandonment and stopping the payment of local property taxes.

in this case the race riots ruined everything, as long as there is a large population of homies it's not going to come back.

Everything is a cycle

@@ERICK-di1yz doesn’t have to be. Just short sightedness leads to that.

City Skylines in a nutshell: Having traffic Problems? Build a freeway Want to make any high density buildings? Freeway Want to run a train through the city? Nope, got to build that freeway. Want an airport? You guessed it freeway.

Hey what laptop do you play skylines on?

It's vastly different than it was 5 years ago. And will be even better in coming years. They have some issues to figure out (like affordable housing), but it'll be fine in the long run.

No, you wouldn't trust me. There are some nicer newer areas and things to do but it is not even close to safe. I've been robbed in broad daylight in a nicer area. I rarely go there anymore because it's so dangerous.

@@marniekilbourne608 You can get robbed in literally any downtown of any city in the world...

@@marniekilbourne608 100 percent true

Don't forget to visit the acres and acres of abandoned property and buildings outside the downtown area. See one or two homes standing on one or three blocks of city streets. Make sure you have a full tank of gas before you travel through these vacant places that exist in the big "D." And carry a gun or two. Don't be a victim of crime that IS there in Detroit. Notice that new housing is being in the downtown area. Putting people in shoeboxes instead of putting people in actual homes. There's no grocery stores in the downtown area like Meijer or Kroger. Dan Gilbert, Chris Illitch, and Billy Ford are building a new Emerald City just like in the movie The Whizzard of Oz. It's all smoke and mirrors, folks. The big three of Gilbert, Ford, and Illitch are just ripping off the Detroit citizens using eye candy. They are only in it for making more money on the backs of people who can't really afford to live there in the downtown area. It's a big money trap. 💰 Big scam.😮

After reading the video title, I was hoping they'd replace I-94 in the city, whose non-existent on-ramps are like Russian roulette

Corrupt political hacks are what killed the city. The city itself had enough to maintain everything it was doing, but this flow of money changed and so too the population, quite naturally.

its*

Jani my mom was born there and worked at the Vernor’s ice cream parlor. My uncle ran for mayor in the 60’s. Amazing city, but much of it didn’t go away, it just moved to the suburbs. I don’t have to mention Hudson’s. The downtown is reforming thanks to millennials from all over taking advantage of the cheaper housing. I think we are both glad to see the reinvigorated downtown. Detroit was one of the most impressive cities ever created. It’s got some of the most impressive suburbs too although they spread the attractions out now.

thank youuuuu. The came in and took advantage. And now they've been making a living off the poverty for so long (esp with the car insurance being the highest in the nation) they are millionaires and billionaires from it. Due to that its virtually impossible to undo the things they are doing. I believe they like it like this and will only allow so much success for the city to have. They don't want too much of it like it used to be let alone like some other cities, but they want to keep it this way because its profitable.

What are the safe areas outside of downtown that are cheaper? Every downtown area will be outrageously priced.

I used to live downtown in the mid 1990s. Rent on my apartment was 400 bucks a month, lol

Why would you live in Wayne County where you'll be taxed at a higher rate, exposed to higher crime, and ... etc.

@@christco120 😯😯 wow...and it was safe.

@@Shazzyhtown oh, I don't know if I would say it was safe. Definitely not safer then than it is now. Back then downtown pretty much emptied by 6 pm, except on the weekends. It was like a ghost town. If it was safe it was only because no one was around.

Yes please

Lol. This is a failed experiment. Detroit collapsed because of Democrat politicians. It can't be fixed by Democrat policies. San Francisco will be next.

Yes especially the part of making ppl depend less on cars is sooo important. Like take a look at many European or Asian suburbs, they have stores in neighborhoods which allows for ppl to only walk a short distance to get something as simple as milk. However in the majority of North America (Canada and US) if you live in the suburbs and don't own a car, you're basically screwed as most of the stores are on the main road or in a far distance. I really wish this would change as it could give the suburbs are more lively and fun feel, rather than isolated and inconvenient.

@@farzana6676 Yeah, cities like Amsterdam, Zürich failed tremendously! Imagine take the bicycle to do your groceries or being able to walk there! It's mind blowing for you probably

@@Holland1994D Lol, first of all Amsterdam is a drug infested red light district run by North Africans and Turks. In America you don't need to ride a bike to buy groceries. They get delivered to your door.

Haha you saw only a small pocket within the city. If you drove around a different area at a different time of day you would not be saying that. If you go to the east side at 3am you better be wearing your bullet proof vest. And how many "Greek" restaurants did you actually see in "Greektown"?

@@rockys7726 he did mention only sound the downtown area

@@MikaelFresco yes but if he goes outside of the pocket it's not a nice area.

@@rockys7726 he never said it was a nice area outside the tourist downtown zone… I’ve walked around Detroit a lot. A lot of people are still afraid but they also never go to the city unless it’s a sporting event and then they peace out immediately.

You just goin less than 5% of downtown🤣

You obviously haven’t been Detroit especially Downtown

@@LilJessye94 I literally work there, and was downtown Friday.

Yet the video doesn't really touch on that. It uses it as the base of the video, but it's more of a jumping-off point to discuss the large problems facing Detroit. I-375 is really just the tip of the iceberg.

@@frankjones2521 Thumbs up, but I think you meant to say just "I work there", or "I actually work there". I don't think you could figuratively work there.

@@bluebee5266 Stop being racist

Yeah We need more food stamps

@@a.b.g.8490 Will is surely talking about things like improved education and improved transit in the residential neighborhoods, which leads to access to better jobs. That results in a better economy and potentially less crime.

@@ronhilliard7920 how about some gentrification and immigration from neighbouring cities with already educated people

i believe the "Real" movers and shakers behind the scenes actually like the city like this. They came in decades ago when the city was very looked down upon as well as going thru a hard time and were allowed to flourish and now they are billionaires. A lot of the abandoned messed up properties all around the city, in neighborhoods too, are owned by millionaires and billionaires. So now any real changes people want to do they have to deal with them. Let alone the politicians that hated the city like L. Brooks.

America doesn't do that. Ifv there's no proof l profit to be made, nobody is interested.

Eh, maybe 15 years. It'll take a bit for Detroit to come back from the mismanagement of the late 90s and 2000s. That more than the Recession of '08 hit the city hard. I watched it happen from just 30 minutes outside the city. Was so very sad. I'm proud to say I come from Metro Detroit though. We got alot of pride up here, and it's what's kept us going all these years.

They like living that way and resist all attempts at civilization. The problem with Detroit are its people. Their representatives ~fiercely black, always Democrat~ are the reason why it's a dump.

@@Stargazzer811Imo the early 1980s hit the city the hardest, we had a energy and oil crisis, 15% inflation and 16% interest. Detroits metropolitan area didn’t start to decline until the 1980s.

Chicagos problem is more of the state governors if you south of chicago the roads suddenly become horrible and you get blasted by potholes. Thank god Im in Indiana now, Indiana at least cares to fix it’s roads and it has had major road spending since the mid 2000s fixing the roads.

In the Detroit-dirty-democrat style, They will double the construction timeline, and quadruple the budgets to drain the working class, and profit their crony's no-bid CONtracts.

America in a nutshell lol

And they have a gubernatorial election before that which could change all of it.

@@tomstevens7452 i mean either gretchen whitmer is elected and it takes 7 years just to start construction or a republican is elected and they most likely just build even more highways if anything changes at all. neither is a win lmao

which means they won't happen, basically. This has been going on for years even before covid. And too when would it finish? As long as they NEVER let the company or companies that are doing the i75 work do it then ok. But i imagine it taking years to do it right.

thank youuuu!!

In 2022, Detroit is the comeback city and it's River Walk has been named the nation's finest 2 years in a row. Time magazine has named Detroit one of the 50 best places to visit in the WORLD! The negativity about Detroit is a tool for exploitation for profit!

@@FrankaiVideos-DetroitsComeback Ah thank you, Frankai. And I just saw that the Gucci store has just opened on Library street. Gotta save my money and buy something. Lol. Maybe a shirt.

@@FrankaiVideos-DetroitsComebacklol no it hasn’t 😊

Detroit needs to cut taxes and deregulate almost everything before anyone realistically invest in the city. Right now if you want to build a factory in the city it can take 2 years to grab permits. That's insane. Than another year or 2 to build. Meanwhile in Texas for example Tesla got permits in 2 days and built it's factory in 9 months.

UNDER BIDEN. 100+ years of the damager biden has done to america

Didn’t happen in one generation. Won’t get fixed in one generation

@@danrook5757 but humans only think In one generation . A city or country must constantly improve without any dip or people just leave . Nobody is like I'm going to move there because it's cheap and in 30 years if we all work together it could be nice . No people be like I'm going over here where it's allready nice .

Less than that. Give it at least 10 years for sure and it will be back like it’s old days

Install and maintain your own power and sewer, hire private security, and pray your house don't catch fire (no private fire departments in most places) and then tell me an 8k tax bill (on a mansion, no less) is a bad deal.

People keep voting D and keep getting the same results. Who'd have thought?

​@@gramma677conservative policies

The only issue is that you would have to dig up a ton of infrastructure and possibly decontaminate the soil before it becomes remotely viable to farm. However abandoning some of the overbuilt infrastructure or ideally destroying it and then letting nature reclaim it may be needed to balance out the city's ledger. Degrowth is hard but may be needed to let the city recover and regrow.

@@popcornone2702agreed, but it’s much harder to do this in practice. And Hugh corruption would make that that impossible I feel like

All through the 70s we'd watch homes get bulldozed and debris (lead, asbestos, etc) filled the abandoned basements. Dirt was then piled on top and grass planted. Farming this land will just create another generation of cancer victims.

All through the 70s we'd watch homes get bulldozed and debris (lead, asbestos, etc) filled the abandoned basements. Dirt was then piled on top and grass planted. Farming this land will just create another generation of cancer victims.

Keep voting one party and expect change 🤡🤦

Youre gonna invite gentrification.

@@randomguy7175 negative iq post

Exactly. The longer we keep looking at Detroit as the shining jewel of the state like it used to be, the longer it is gonna take us to realize the reality that it is just the stinking butthole of the state

@@jneuf861good. That’s how Midwest cities can be saved. Only way is gentrification and pushing prices too high for most people.

With little knowledge of Detroit zoning/real estate demand I would imagine if people are leaving the city there literally isn’t enough demand for a wide scale upzoning to take place. If parts of the city with higher density zoning aren’t being built on, I don’t see why the thousands of abandoned lots would suddenly be developed given an up zoning. I do think up zoning the city would be good, but the city also just needs to be more desirable to developers as well.

​@@tfhorsch4527 fixing past mistakes is expensive too. if you upzone you need to build the city smaller. hence fixing the Infastructure. to upzone you need to demolish a lot,and I think demolition gets pricey. regardless, I can't wait to see. the faster they finish the better.

@@tfhorsch4527 the whole point of mixed used zoning is that you can build anything you want, so if you’re not limited to building just a single family home, and nothing else. People and businesses are not limited, and can build other things like triplexes, ground floor businesses with upper floor housing, office spaces, the idea of being able to build what you want isn’t commonplace considering the majority of land dedicated to any sort of development is almost always just single-family housing, which is apparent in the supply crisis happening right now in America which is driving up housing costs (along with other factors of course)

Minneapolis has a surging migrant crisis that has been occurring for over a decade. These are low-skilled, low-wage workers that the city needs to house. So of course the city wants to get rid of single family zoning so they can get as many apartments as possible to house them. Minneapolis has been making poor decisions for it's citizens for nearly 20 years and within the next 20 years it will resemble Detroit in the 1980s.

@@jj4ester366 you framed that as if mixed zoning for people that need housing is a bad thing to invest in, considering the housing crisis supply crisis right now where housing isn’t being built at the rate of demand, that’s a good thing. Development should also exist to bring careers into a neighborhood, they aren’t mutually exclusive to mixed used zoning, mixed use means you can just build whatever you want, whether it be a business, or a house, or both at the same time, rather than it being separated in which people have no other option but to invest in a car, and drive to somewhere to get to work rather than getting somewhere however they please. Besides zoning, you need proper education, to learn skills needed to get to high paying jobs, which Detroit is investing in along with the businesses for people to go to, and is doing the best a cash strapped city can do considering it has to use its money to demolish entire structures that aren’t used any more, and maintain infrastructure for a city built for 2 million, for a population of a few hundred thousand. Rome was not built in a day, it will take decades

Detroit is an armpit. A little visit doesn't give you enough time to see the real side of the city, which is rampant crime and racism like you've never experienced anywhere else.

The only thing propping it up is outside money. The problem are the majority of its residents. They're violent, willfully uneducated, and hate to work.

I've never been to the US, but I would think that if the city took the opportunity to plant signficant numbers of trees and turn land over toe forrested parklands, then the city would become very attractive for many people who want to live in a green urban environment.

@@BDub2024 That's been tried over and over, never worked. Detroit's problem is crime and it ain't going anywhere.

Hope you got to visit our amazing Detroit Institute of Arts and headed out to Dearborn to see The Henry Ford!

the solution is to end welfare.

The Strong Towns mentality! My friend lived where commercial spaces existed under multi-level apartments and duplexes. All parking was done in a partial underground and surface level garage. The benefit is that everything there was walkable and contained quite a few things. You didn't really need to drive much. It seemed like a good concept and was pretty nice.

Never waste a good crisis. An opportunity for innovative solutions.

Sadly, Detroit is one of the cities most impacted by freeways. They already caused serious isolation and car-friendly development.

Plenty of neighborhoods within Detroit that are walkable on a night out. Neighborhood to neighborhood requires some sort of transportation.

@@josepholdani543 and who were the people that lived there? i bet it wasn't the usual muggers and crack heads

All the competent white people left. Auto manufacturing moved to other more competitive states.

The Democrats have run both cities since before I was born.

@@jacobzindel987 it's a two party problem not just a Democratic Party problem. You don't have these systemic problems in countries with parliamentary governments!

But they didn't ship the jobs overseas, at least not in the period of the largest downturn. They shipped them to other states where governments gave incentives to build plants so politicians could campaign on how they brought jobs to the state. Meanwhile, Wayne county constantly raised business taxes and the UAW mad it the most expensive place to hire a worker. It wasn't cheap labor in other countries that killed Detroit, it was cheap labor in other parts of the US, and government policies that encouraged businesses to move anywhere else. Most of them just moved 10 to 20 miles away to cities like warren and sterling heights in Macomb and Oakland counties that had tax policies that actually encouraged businesses. It wasn't until the 90's that global trade actually started moving those jobs to other countries.

The UAW had a big hand in forcing companies to non union / right to work states.

It’s actually a lot better. I invite you to visit.

Charles want to see the opposite of a city that is beautiful and VERY safe? Vancouver BC or...countries in Europe!

Actual real elections would fix Detroit and less indoctrination keeping the poor on the plantation and part of the tax base that benefits unfortunately the poor and middle class everywhere is under attack for a new system that removes vehicles and takes property ownership away. This sounds like a test market the fed reserve ready to loan out of thin air 20 years everyone will be upside down on the dole crammed into a mixed use nightmare.

It's Putin hand!

The downfall started way before Coleman Young. 1967 riots FREAKED people out - white and black (I was there, I'm an old man.). The whites fled to the suburbs, true. However, the up and coming black middle and upper classes fled to Atlanta. There were many black professionals that saw the riots and decided NOT to raise their families there.

@@climeaware4814 yeah Londonistan

Detroit is in a tricky spiral. It developed infrastructure for a city of 2M people based on the height of the domestic automobile industry. Since 1950, the auto industry died and Detroit experienced a population decline of 65%. Its problems outsize its means.

Pretty much but there is more to it. It used to be nice but once it started going downhill it went downhill very quickly. I think it's beyond saving at this point even with the new additions. I'd live there if it was even close to semi safe. I've been robbed in broad daylight in a nicer area so no way! I can't.

Detroit is a major tech hub, additionally Microsoft and Google have offices in downtown Detroit

As a native Michigander, You nailed it. Though this wasn’t always the case. For many decades Detroit use to manufacture so many other things other than cars, but as those jobs started to leave, the people and money went with it.

Car manufacturing was a great source of employment for the people of Detroit. They usually paid above market average and had Unions and pensions. Outsourcing these manufacturing jobs destroyed what made Detroit so great in the first place.

I'm excited for Detroit's future.

I don't. Greenies are a bane on society.

only if they replace the highway with some good public transit

Did I miss the part where they discussed tearing down highways? lol. They discussed the problems 375 caused, but then ... nothing. I had to look up a separate article to find out that they're actually planning to deconstruct 375 and turn it into a boulevard.. something this video didn't even bother mentioning as far as I saw...

@@naaspam1185 yeah the video title's misleading.

I don't think they should tear it. But to build over it or make a tunnel like Boston to build on top.

I'm sure Russia probably put it there.

Victim hood mentality. They love it.

Born and raised from the D. The blacks created this city and now that the white man has came to build back better, the black man wants to complain again? They like the way they made our city. Never forget '67 Never Forgive '67

My dad came of age in Detroit in the '30s - '40s. One time in the 90s, he took me around downtown and pointed out all the changes that had happened since then. It was sad, but it doesn't mean that Detroit is doomed. It was a great city then and it can be again.

​@@thepatriarchy819 It's amazing that social media continues to provide a megaphone for ignoramuses and haters. This is a problem that damages the country as well as Detroit.

If you die tonight, do you know where you're going? Did you know that Jesus Christ is THE only way to Heaven and He loves you? Through Him, God offers you a FREE gift - forgiveness. All you need to do is repent, turn away from your sins and evil ways, from now on put your faith completely in Jesus Christ and be obedient to Him. Biblical explanation of the Gospel: God doesn’t want anybody in hell because He loves us, but you must understand why we deserve hell and why those who refuse to live under His authority will go there. (Matthew 12:30) ''Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.'' He gave us the law (Ten Commandments) not to make us righteous, but rather to show us our sin (Romans 3:20). God gave us free will and since Adam sinned in the garden, sin is the nature of our flesh and we ALL have sinned. (Romans 3:23) The law demands death to those who sin (Romans 6:23). Revelation 21:8 says that all liars will go to hell. For someone to be justified before holy God they have to be sinless, that's why everyone need Jesus Christ - for He lived a sinless life and resurrected. None of us are good in God’s eyes, because for God good means moral perfection. We all have broken God’s commandments, we all have sinned in our lives so none of us are good. ‘’For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.’’ (James 2:10). Our carnal mind is hostile to God; it does not submit to God's moral law and it never will (Romans 8:7). We hate the thought of God for the same reason a criminal hates a policeman - we know we have sinned against God and are guilty of it, but we don't want to be damned. Good News is that Jesus Christ lived a perfect, holy, sinless life, Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, He was buried and He was raised from the dead on the third day according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3-4) For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.’’ (John 3:16) We aren’t saved based on our good deeds/works, but only by the grace of God through faith. ''For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith - and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast. (Ephesians 2:8-9) Jesus said ‘’it is finished’’ (John 19:30) just before He died on the cross, which means He paid the fine for our sins (past, present, future) to be forgiven if we repent and trust in Him. ''What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not!'' (Romans 6:15) ''Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out'' (Acts 3:19) Repentance is a turning away from sin and all evil works, and it always results in changed behavior (Luke 3:8). Biblically, a person who repents does not continue willfully in sin. While sorrow from sin is not equivalent to repentance, it is certainly an element of scriptural repentance (2 Corinthians 7:10). Do not play a hypocrite. ''God is light; in Him there is no darkness at all. If we claim to have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth.'' (1 John 1:5-6) If you have repented and have genuine faith in Jesus Christ then you will receive the gift of Holy Spirit and be born-again spiritually. (John 3:3) Jesus replied, "Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again." When you believed, you were marked in Him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession - to the praise of His glory. (Ephesians 1:13-14) You are born again with the Spirit of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17). Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him. (John 3:36) ''You will know them by their fruits'' (Matthew 7) If you have been truly born-again with the Holy Spirit and He has regenerated your heart, you will desire righteousnes - to do what is good and righteous in God's eyes, to seek God everyday in His Word and prayer, to strengthen your relationship with God. You will no longer desire to willfully continue living in sin but will want to obey God out of your love for Him because of His amazing grace revealed to us through the death and resurrection of His Son. ''Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new.'' (2 Corinthians 5:17) ''For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.'' (Eph 2:10) You will have a testimony - of what your life had been before and how has it changed now when you have surrendered it to Lord Jesus Christ. As a declaration and affirmation of your faith in Jesus Christ, get baptised in water because He commanded us to do so. In John 3:5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit.'' ''Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit'' (Matthew 28:19) ''Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day.'' (Acts 2:41) ''And this water symbolizes the baptism that now saves you also - not the removal of dirt from the body, but the pledge of a clear conscience toward God - through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,'' (1 Peter 3:21) ''We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.'' (Romans 6:4) ''Having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through your faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.'' (Colossians 2:12) Please get right with God and start your relationship with Jesus Christ today before it’s too late, because there’s not much time left! "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.’’ (Mark 13:32) Get to know Christ through God's Word - Bible. At first I recommend reading Gospel of John and book of Romans. God bless you! Jeremiah 29:13 - ''You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart.''

take! the man! back!

Yes, but the inner city needs big big money and big big rebuilding.

The problem is Detroit has so much more developable land than Pittsburgh. The scale of the solution needed in Detroit is just massive and it's hard when your city is run under a monoculture of a political party with a long track record of historical corruption.

And the gentrification is focus on downtown and midtown only. There are still so many deserted area that no one will care about

Wait, what is Pittsburgh's identity? lol

@@StochasticUniverse10 or 15 years ago they said Pittsburgh's economy was all about education and medical. Now it's technology, education, medical, and finance most likely in that order.

If your interested in learning about how we can make our cities financially strong I highly recommend you watch Not Just Bikes’ ~8 video series called Strong Towns.

@@MasonJarGaming thanks very much for the recommendation. I will check it out.

Highways remove people off of side streets that contain local businesses. Its not like these people wont still be able to get down town. But now they will drive past places they didn't see before and may patronize these local places thus creating growth.

The new plan is badddd. It's an 8 lane monstrosity that is *not* pedestrian friendly, Almost exactly the same infrastructure, only now it's surface level. I don't see how it's gonna be an improvement, especially considering out expensive it will be: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bcl1hraQqJbYYoE.html

These are all great ideas. Some of them are expensive, but in the long run, none of them are as expensive as building out suburban car sprawl was.

Great ideas but delusional for the city that filed bankruptcy.

Ever been to Detroit? Good luck. It's cold and it's violent. People left there for a reason. Most of them went to Atlanta.

@@simonmojarad4806 1 is already happening if you watch the video. 3 is happening already, just need to zone properly. 4 is free. 5 is cheap.

That sounds like a communist hell. Which is much worse than it is now.

Well said!

If it’s any sign, the 2023 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation is being hosted there. And as far as I can tell there are only good things being said of it, including from APEC’s website; ““Detroit represents the story of United States’ economic revitalization, transformation and resilience,” said Matt Murray, US Senior Official for APEC. “Detroit showcases the importance of cross-border trade with our neighbor, worker-centric trade policies and an advanced manufacturing industry, making it a perfect location for highlighting economic inclusion and innovative growth.” “We are committed to being a good steward of APEC to promote an international economic policy that boosts prosperity both at home and in the region,” Murray added. “APEC has delivered success stories in the past three decades and we want to build on this momentum.””

Downtown Detroit is a great place. I live here, and I love it for the most part. Detroit / Michigan summers are hard to beat.. But that is coming from someone who lives here. You could consider that something that you are hearing about.

Everything and every place is not for all people. Everyone in Detroit is not living in the state of poverty, black or white. Life is good for them!

Lol Time magazine is just a website.

Thanks for watching and leaving a comment 🖕🖕 🖕 I have a package for you 🎁🎁

@TNerd they already moving with or without the highway, for once let do something new.

thats the DEM party playbook. Those that remain are controllable and dependent on the politicians. The people then demand non-enforcement of crime and more handout programs.

The producers left because the Africans became too violent.

That's nice of you but it seems beyond saving. It is not safe. Sure it has history all cities do but most of it is rotting or has been torn down. It used to be really nice a long time ago then it quickly went to hell. I'd live there if it was cleaned up in all areas and if it even close to kind of safe but it just is not. I fear just visiting. I've been robbed in broad daylight so it really is rarely worth the risk and that makes me sad because there are things to do and some nice restaurants and businesses but too much of the city is a hell hole. And idk how it can possibly be returned to a new version of what it once was.

@@marniekilbourne608 Dang, you're saying 600K+ people are beyond saving? harsh

@@MCAndyT Live there like I do, then you'll understand.

@@KingfishStevens-di9ji I do live here, yo! Right near the Ambassador Bridge

@@MCAndyT keep you doors locked.

Agreed, it’s one of the other. Improve and watch new companies and educated upper class professionals displace some of the poor. Or let it stay a gangsters paradise.

Facts

@@lowrider94ss This is something your mom should have taught you. If you dislike the run down part of the city but like the low rents and opportunity for larceny. OK but you can’t also what improvements that come with higher rents and property taxes and costs these in turn force out residents who can’t afford the new higher costs.

@@Dog.soldier1950 there are ways to generate a more natural social gradient without making such an abrupt one which allows people to adjust ...no?

@@vanhoot2234 Cuba has done it. Everyone is poor

Move to Detroit suburbs, have some kids, send them to Detroit school system. Should be great.

they just removed the high rises as they turned into rat holes as will anything if you don't know how to keep it up and the people who live in them DON"T

You totally missed the highway thing. They are looking to tear it out, not build a new one. It needs to go.

@@ChristopherBurtraw Ahh makes sense!

@@katstaff317 in fairness, you didn't miss it. I rewatched and the video isn't clear on it, I had already known about the proposals so I missed the lack of clarity.

I can see why you're moving to Detroit from Ohio. Ohio has nothing to offer citizens in Ohio in the first place. So Detroit eye candy really sparkles in an Ohio dead person's eyes. Hope you don't become a crime victim when you get to the big "D". You'll be wishing for the green grass of farms back in Ohio. Beware sucker.

The lifestyle in Detroit died in the 1950s when Democrats started running the city.

@@leonardcollings7389 The lifestyle in Detroit began to die in the 1950's and 60's when middle class Detroiters fled the city for the suburbs followed by the civil unrest of the 1970's and the collapse of the American Auto industry in the 1980's. In the 2000's it was the Republican Party that said the US auto industry was dead and left it to die. It was the Democratic Obama administration that said no, it isn't dead, and propped the industry up with federal money until it recovered. AND every nickel of that money was paid back to the federal government WITH interest. Go get an education Lenny.

@@kenb3552 The seeds of Detroit’s collapse were planted even as the economy boomed and the city grew in the mid-1900s. The Great Migration brought waves of African-Americans, and stoked racial tensions over housing and labor. Walkouts and TRUE RACE riots began as early as 1943, and discrimination would only accelerate from there. White-majority homeowner’s associations fought to maintain de facto segregation by race and class, with support from discriminatory regulations and programs. These groups staged campaigns to keep public housing out of white neighborhoods and to block public school funding. There were even crosses burned throughout the city in 1965. Where these efforts failed, white flight to the suburbs WITH THE BUILDING BOOM OF THE 60S provided the chance to start over with even more control. The ongoing construction of freeways to quickly move people to and from the city’s fringes bolstered this trend.

@@leonardcollings7389 people were discriminating against the crime.

Detroit is the perfect place to restart precisely because of this. They need to focus on renter oriented housing rather than single family homes.

@@katjerouac As long as the ruling administration is in its current form nothing will change. They’re still back at square one with revenue issues. The main competition is the suburbs and they’re just quite frankly better run.

@@buzzfeedright4154 problem is that the suburbs ARE subsidized by the city. They tend to have all the perks and not the responsibility of paying for utilities.

Affordable housing combined with restructuring the economics of the city around more than just cars. Detroit needs to invest in small businesses. Build the city from the ground up and not just cater to big corporations.

@@ianhomerpura8937 People would wanna live in the city due to the location if it was ran better they would. There’s plenty of room for the type of suburban sprawl that they’ve become accustomed to over generations. Corruption prospers at every corner that’s what stops them from doing it, and I don’t see that changing any time soon unfortunately.

Walkability, and public transport, are the way of the future. This is Detroit's chance to move to a European way of life and become a model for other cities.

there will be no city unless crime is dealt with and thugs are put out

@@Chahlie Rural is the future, shut up.

Metro detroit/downtown NEEDS a subway system👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

@@TheOwl22 rural is why taxes are so high. To live in a rural area the infrastructure costs significantly more therefore increased taxes to sustain it

where do the public transit go if giant highways are where the public transit need to be? kinda hard to have both at the same time, hence why most places cut their public transit to build more highways...

@@baileyedwards3711 not sure the best place, but if they want to tear down the highway, they better start digging some subway tunnels. Cause right now the highways are hands down the fastest and most convenient way to travel in Detroit

Robert Moses destroyed inner cities to the point now people can’t envision that there is another way, instead of elevated highways they can start putting all intra city highways in trenches capped by deck parks like klyde warren park in Dallas or Frankie pace park in Pittsburgh paid for through public private partnerships that could spur economic development all along these corridors

@@user-Jamie218 Boston and settle didnt get rid of freeways, they both said look we can improve traffic and the overall environment and spur growth by placing the freeway underground, which is the best solution for the traffic from the Detroit Windsor tunnel, area resident and business.

Detroit has subpar public transportation

The gentrification problem in Detroit is in the neighborhoods that held on through all the bad years and are now seeing moneyed people come back and just buy up their community. The money needs to develop the empty areas, not the ones that the community kept civil.

good point

Waste

@@DKK the same political parties thought highway was a good idea x number of years ago is probably the same one that thinks this new plan is good now- it's probably not going to be people that are hurting right now

@@DKK disagree

Thanks for watching and leaving a comment 🖕🖕 🖕 I have a package for you 🎁🎁🎁

I also live in Lafayette Park. I agree. But people will take their own words for it and not from people who actually stay here.

I lived in Lafayette Park when it was first built 1963. It was great back then.

exactly. All of the ploys they are using rely on having a base of citizens to cover the taxes this growth requires. But if there is no base or jobs for the base to pay.... its an endless circle of boom bust. These developments will get built. no jobs come for people to afford them and then things sit empty.

Seattle and Atlanta >>>> Detroit and those other cities you mentioned

@@akolyt Seattle and Atlanta have the highest hiv rate and combined with all that was said about Detroit...bottomline Detroit is on a rise !!!

Climate change has dramatically reduced "brutally cold" winters in Detroit.

The crime has skyrocketed in Atlanta because of people from the "North" moving To the city and the surrounding suburbs. Detroit, Wisconsin, Chicago, Ohio Indiana, New York, Philadelphia Pennsylvania. One thing about if you come to Atlanta or to the South. You commit a crime you are going to jail for a Very long time that's if you don't get killed 1st In the Streets of Atlanta, Everybody has a gun just like a cell phone.

@@crunchmaneslice276 i'm not going to get hiv just by walking through those cities

I thought all the crime areas are empty

Everybody and their mama know about Detroit and crime. That doesn't need to be discussed over and over again and plus crime is everywhere

@@wildsidetv313 : actually I was up north in muskoka on the weekend, there’s no crime there

Slowly getting better.

The criminal element will not be removed. This is a large city and this is america. You can reduce the problem. You don't think that 200,000 quality people would move to this city? That's crazy.

That problem laid with the maintenance costs to constantly replace the damage vs the cost to make a decent place to live to start with when people had no skin in the game or looking death in the face of they said anything or helped the police remove the crime.

​@@ResortDog Before Duggan is was like $12k to demo a defunct vacant house in Detroit. He promised it would become cheaper because he espoused $12k was too expensive. Said he would shop around the country for contractors. Under him it is now over $50k to demo a vacant defunct house in Detroit, and the contractors are his buddies. This is only one of many examples of false promises and corruption committed because of an ignorant general populace voting demographic.

Exactly..and as they move out, others are moving in and rejuvenating Detroit.

It's definitely about mindset.

@@jillpatton3432 Hmm, so what about the people who live here, that are also rejuvenating detroit? Do you understand how hard that is, especially without access to the same capital that those "others" have access to. I think you are really disrespecting the people who have stayed here and rebuilt this city. I am a teacher here and i find you comment highly disrespectful.

@@eddielacrosse2 .. fair point. Didn't mean to denigrate the good folks that stayed and worked to rebuild. My apologies.

I know...crazy how people who live in major cities think that overtaxing businesses, forcing equity on all contracts, and enabling soft on crime policies will make any city, let alone, Detroit, better......

@@steve19811 exactly. As Forrest Gump said,"Stupid is as Stupid does."

Right there's a reason why the city went from having a million people to only 600,000

good

Woodward and Trowbridge -- ain't that Highland Park? Highland Park is rough.

@@nickycheese no it's Detroit

I think Detroit is banking on people buying Ford pickup trucks, haha. Buying a $1,500 phone might help someplace, but it's not Detroit.

@I STAN Kim Jong-Un but Can't STAND Trump wow, you’re a genius level genius

It has the chance to become a great city!