I lived through the N64 era... the fact that we have consoles that can hit 120fps now it's just so mind blowing to me.

Damn, Shadow of the Colossus and Metal Gear Solid 3 is very playable back in the day.

Lol yeah I played on both performance mode and graphics mode I'm okay with both the modes.

Cyberpunk entered the chat

@@uum6 Yeah if you play Cyberscam on old gen you can revive the darker times.

Even if it meant lowering to 1080p I’d play it in that mode.

They said there is team is small so they cant.

I was looking for someone to bring this up lol. I hope so too. I want my RT and 60.

Probably more of a 900p60fps mode

i think they wont, sadly. The Insomniac team is just to talented to make them a standart for expectasions...

So happy with my Series S and my 1080 Tv.

Definitely. The fact that a 300$ console can run a game like that at 60 FPS is something that amaze me... For the same price on the market, you have a Switch. I love the Switch don't get me wrong, but if you just want your 1080/60fps (It's not like 4K is a standard, even though people talk like it is), you're good to go with a Series S and the Game pass. Hopefully we'll have more 60fps on the Series S in the future

@@MadX8 yes im also loving my series S. wanted an x originally but couldnt get one so bought the S and im so impressed that now im not going to buy a series X. i got a external hdd for cheap so the storage issue is solved.

@@MadX8 Sadly, there are still games which do run better on One X than on Series S. The Long Dark for example runs at a native 2160p at 30 fps on One X and 1080p at 30 fps on Series S because it's utilizing base Xbox One code.

I think the series s is good but only for now . I mean rn it can play games 900p -1080p 60fps but what about the future ? it probably won't be able to do that in future . I think it probably won't even be able to do 1080p 30fps after 5 years .

The thing is, each step of ray tracing takes up a little over 1ms and it doesn't matter at which resolution you do it, so 60fps with RT is really difficult. I guess there could be a 1080p 40fps mode with RT and ultra settings. It would work well since 120hz/3= 40 so there would be even frame pacing, with the added beneffit that if there is a dropped frame, you wouldn't feel it nearly as much as if dropping from 30 to 20.

@@SalveMonesvol Ultra settings? Consoles? Are you on drugs? This game is on mostly low, mixed with some medium with some that appears to be lower than low that can't even be set on PC

@@patrickang7739 The question is: Why would a game not run at even 4k30 on an RTX 3090? Because if it can't do 1080p on ps5, it can't do 4k on 3090 either. Let that sink.

@@SalveMonesvol My 3080 can do 4K max settings at 30fps. I don't play it like that, but I have tested it.

@@monkfishy6348 Then a Series X can do exactly the same @1440p. What they can't do well, is RT above 30fps.

You gotta mention Crysis somewhere for it to work, or else his shrine won't ping him.

@@rlfernandes9538 Don't forget Turok

🤣

You have to first believe that we live in a simulation so that the reflection is ray traced

Lmfao

Better compression.

Also free on ps5!

Next gen compression in use VS next gen compression not in use

Isn't that the Kraken compression system they were talking about?

how about series S. it loaded the fastest, does it have the biggest or smallest file size.

Very interesting information!

All that tells me is that the Series X/S versions didn’t receive the same amount of time and optimization. Makes it even worse when you consider that it’s free on PS and $40 on Series consoles. Sad.

It's not about optimization but rather how the Xbox Series S/X handles compression. PlayStation 5 can decompress and move data faster than the Xbox Series S/X because of the architectural improvements. So if the data is compressed as much on Xbox Series S/X as it is on the PlayStation 5 it would result in longer loading times and possible pop-in due to taking more time for the system to decompress the data.

@@ghostthough7874 yeah odd even on another comparison channel they have ps5 load faster by a couple of seconds while here they say series s and x beat ps5 by a couple of seconds, so it seems to be random loading depending on location

@@brucecarter6205 The PS5 has better compression technology, and they just filed another patent to make compression even better by significantly shrinking file sizes without quality loss.

I am looking forward to trying it. I am playing AC valhalla and Immortals which are big games. I will get tonit eventually. The haptics are cool on PS5.

O hold me richard !!! Lol ...I can't bare the millisecond frame drops lol.. na seriously I have this game on PC I only have a 1660 super at 1440p 60 frames and my damn PS5 is running it pretty close if not better .. you guys also gotta try out division 2 , 4k 60fps update , it looks phenomenal... The best $8.99 I ever spent on game lol..add me on psn If u guys want..bet9898.

@@wizzenberry God of War looks pretty good on my PS4. I am currently playing through Horizon Zero Dawn on my new rdna 2 6800 xt @ 1440p with all settings maxed out it's drop dead gorgeous.

@@kaleidoskope4314 yeah and if u can experience horizon zero dawn with hdr, def do so, some of the best ive seen

Not just when firing weapons, that little tap when walking that changes depending on what you are standing on or what your pace is, that is the real winner.

Yea and my ps5 literally takes 4 - 5 sec to load and get into a game. I dont know why DF ps5 takes 11.41 sec.

Digital foundry are bias towards xbox and anything Microsoft have people not noticed that

@@19RoFlMao19 user location is a factor that affects loading speed.. source: Google

@@cir-ce1043 i see your point. But a 6 sec difference? Also i will take your point with a grain of salt as google is not a credible source of research.

@@daryllivingstone6257 said no one ever.

They will come very soon my friend

Already seeing comments like "another L for SeriesX"

@@carolinagamer2874 yeah from both "sides" actually

@@carolinagamer2874 it's fan boys on both sides are just as bad, look at the hitman comments. People needs to just enjoy what they are playing instead of worrying about minimal differences.

@Steps I've seen both sides so not pointing the finger at one or the other, both are bad

Agreed. It's cool, but RT isn't transformative enough to go from 60 to 30, imo

but you could take cool screenshots on rt mode tho

It only lasts few minutes before your brains adjust to change.

Ehhhhhh... A consistent 30fps is fine

I would say that most people would get used to quickly. Like dozens of millions who enjoyed 30fps games on the last generation of consoles.

Jesse becomes director. Dylan dies. Idgaf

@@sabus1265 Jesse becomes director in the beginning of the game? How is that a spoiler? Are u actually mad that people play in graphics mode lmao.

Switching between the two, I can't do it. RT looks great but it's just too janky compared to 60FPS.

@@transfo47 my eyes get used to it but it is hard from time to time when I switch to performance mode and go back to graphics

@@benvids shh let him have this. Life is rough atm for him

It’s jarring in almost any game. As a lifelong console gamer I’m loving the 60fps. I don’t ever want to play at 30 again I don’t care what graphical improvements I forfeit

I'm not sure the 1st gen rt cores could handle it even at 1080p. The one example we have (spiderman) doesn't use rt very extensively.

@@tastet5565 OMG that’s exactlyyyyyyyyy how I feel playing 60 now I could never ever go back to 30 keep the day tracing with 30 I’ll take 60 all day everyday

60fps or nothing 30 out

Well I would think they could. I mean spiderman miles can to rt with 60fps. But I'm no expert.

You can always do 2nd playthrough in Graphics mode

Rt power should be used in illumination personally.

different strokes for different folks i guess. i personally go with the best graphics possible. i only aim for higher fps in competitive online games

Wild you cant see it

I would rather have bigger and more complicated levels, physics, textures, and geometry.

You make a good point. I hope developers have implemented a system into their games to track how many people use ray tracing mode and how long they are playing while using that mode. RT is a nice feature to have, but at the expense of FPS, so it'll be interesting to see how many gamers chose FPS over RT. If RT isn't that popular, then developers can spend their time on something more important with their games.

Yall really get hyped over small frame-rate dips? Lmao

@@retrohil6225 more like we get hyped over shitting on Xbots because it’s so easy and satisfying

It's not subtle though.

@@yadspi it's subtle compared to 30 vs 60fps. Double the temporal resolution and increased responsiveness > shiny floors, especially in a game that involves aiming.

@@NGuy-kz2eh This isn't Quake, 30fps is totally adequate for playing Control. RT brings more than reflections and really makes a scene far more natural looking.

It'll be different next generation when more mature rt hardware is available. These consoles can't do much rt as it is.

@@somethingdifferent9024 Naw, its not. I played it at 80+fps on PC. The improvement responsiveness looks and feels great.

I agree and same!

Seeing that rt performance hurts though.

@@brownchair2698 yeah. It's too bad this generation launched with 1st gen rt cores. Another year and it might have actually made sense to use rt on consoles. I'm really hoping AMD's answer to DLSS can be made available to consoles. that would be a game changer, especially for the series s.

@@brownchair2698 it does but I’ve honestly come to terms with it. Many people don’t realize how crazy intensive it is to try and output something at 4K 60, with or without ray tracing. These consoles would have to be significantly more expensive to be able to handle that. I do hear you though. I have a 4K 120hz TV and I’m constantly switching between performance and quality mode with games that offer it. Seeing those crisp visuals and ray traced reflections is so nice, but the 60fps really shines in a game like Control. It’s tough to choose.

@@DanKaschel There is no AMD's answer to DLSS for consoles. Microsoft themselves are working on their own version of Machine Learning algorithm, while PlayStation don't want it and turned it down.

Damage control for PS5 superior version while glossing over Xbox Series X dropping to 45fps, 10 frames below the lowest point of PS5 performance in this game.

@@riceeater79 this is the worst next gen patch, what i see on ps5 and xsx. What you get? Low,low, low, lower than low and medium setting on 1440p like one x (last gen console) even one x have some setting higher than ps5 and xsx😂😂 only one visible upgrade is 60 fps or RT but in 30 fps wtf??? Ps5 and xsx have gpu like rtx2070super but on this gpu in pc game run max setting in 1440p with 60 fps with the same drops like ps5 low,low,lower than low performance and quality mod !!!!!

@@ttwinsturbo I think the devs are to blame for this one.

@@riceeater79 Xbox always renders at higher resolution. And this is still a cross gen game comparison. Not too bright, are you

@@user-fm8xs3hr3w lol maybe you should join everyone in the present. This isn't prelaunch spec sheet talk anymore buddy. None of what you're saying had materialized unless by *always* you're ONLY referring to Hitman 3 lol

Same. When roaming around I use Graphics, once I spot enemies though, I switch to performance.

@@rex41e would be weird for them to button toggle it

@@slitherman7883 Lmfao

I found myself doing that last night when I was playing. I'm terrible at aiming at 30fps so for bigger fights or a boss fight I switch to performance mode but otherwise graphic mode is beautiful. I played it originally on PC with RTX but I haven't played any of the expansions so I'm going to play everything on PS5 and Platinum the game.

Which is exactly why I think Devs should set a universal standard where the cutscenes run at 30, 4K, and Ray Traced to oblivion. Meanwhile the gameplay should naturally cutback, and run at 60. This gives all games a great visual-performance balance blend without need of player intervention. Basically in a way to go back to the PS1 FMV cutscene standard

What a lovely day!! (MAD MAX)

Yep PS5 is kicking Series X ass so hard lol

@@marcusmoore4819 how? Both consoles are underperforming multiplat games and have like 2-3 exklusives yet. It will take atleast 1 more year for these consoles to show what they really can.

Yaaaaay old games! This has been the weakest new console launches in history

@@CMOA1621996 Damn you Xbots can’t spell lol

I was pretty similar. Now I just like watching these breakdowns for the fun of it and the info

I hate those 2 settings. First thing I check for when booting up a game for the first time, disable those mfs off

Yup same here with the ps5 all my games I turn those off

@MTF_Savage_Beasts i doubt you run at Native 4k without dlss enabled so stop with your master racer things, this is a consoles comparison

@MTF_Savage_Beasts Consoles don't have DLSS, this is an Nvidia tech ...

Turning those off makes it look very video gamey and exposes more flaws. I'm always baffled at how many people turn these features off which improve the look of the game.

I see what you did there

It so nice that it makes adaptive triggers brokes easily, dualsense sucks

@@runninginthe90s75 Weird mine are still working perfectly.

@@runninginthe90s75 mine works ferfect

I was looking forward to you looking forward to this

@@sean7332 I was looking forward to you looking forward to this comment

Thanks Bart

@@juicedchef2849 I was looking forward to you for this reply which is looking forward to another reply of the comment which is looking forward to this video

My powers have doubled since the last time we met Count

Don't be disappointed, they are far too negative on the xbox, I've played it for hours at 60fps and it plays superb

We had 60fps games last gen lol...

@@kobeandgary so did we. Also, doesn't upgrading your pc to run a game make it a new gen?

@@battfinkz the fuck?

@@battfinkz and who the fuck is we? 😂

Kinda impressive its free on ps plus.. games with gold could learn a thing or two

@@sean7332 its on gamepass

@@mrping4091 That’s the last gen version LOL

@@mrping4091 The base game is on gamepass not this version. Xbox gamers will need to buy it.

@@sean7332 Ps plus could learn to have 1000s of quality games like on Gamepass.

The reflections are rendered at very low resolution to help keep the framerate good. Multiple low resolution frames are composed together over time to create the reflective surface at a final, reasonable resolution instead of either a grainy mess or a blurry smear. We still sometimes get the grainy mess like the walkway to the hotline, so even this approach isn't bulletproof. This occurs in both 30fps/RT and 60fps/SSR modes, but it's less apparent in the 60fps mode both because the frames aren't as "old", and because screen-space reflections aren't as detailed as RT reflections. It's an unfortunate and distracting visual artifact as a result of Remedy pushing the boundaries of accurate real-time lighting past what modern hardware (RTX3090 notwithstanding) is really ready for.

More annoying than amazing. It sounds good, but I could do without it. Haptics are better than centrifugal vibration though.

@@TheRealist1. You can turn it off, so having the option to use it or not can only be viewed as a positive here.

Yes good for single player experience but unnecessary for multiplayer

@@xaviermalcolm8481 I said how I felt... Locking triggers are unnecessary, but I like the haptics. Tried Destruction all-stars and it's okay on that game, but it's not a big deal if I didn't have it. I thought my kid would be blown away with it.

I turned off haptics and adaptive triggers a few minutes after trying Astro Bots. Bloody annoying battery killing feature

Not tryna be rude or anything but ps needs that bc of the low storage amount hopefully they can do this later with other games

Agreed. But it seems like this dev didn't use bcpack on Xbox for some reason. Should not be that big. Interesting that the load times are somehow better on xbox

@@pixelbitg9386 but the performance, frame pacing and stutter is worse on xbox too...

@@duncanself5111 no only the stuttering everything else is the same

@@milk6765 they said there's bigger drops on the Series X, like when text pops up on screen, I think I saw it drop down to the mid 40s at one point and frame pacing issues too, plus it takes 42% more space on your ssd if you have the xbox version... And there's Dual Sense implementation apparently

WHO?

They coming with the tools excuse or it's the devs fault

There's a bottleneck somewhere because this seems to happen over a few games

@@kennyk9652 was this issue present in the latest Hitman comparison?

@@GODEYE270115 no hitman on the x is the best version between the two

@@kennyk9652 not an excuse the truth

currently playing this at over 100fps with full ray tracing. Forget PS5 just get a PC instead.

​@@purefoldnz3070 Sure, you can always just build a pc that outperforms a ps5, but the graphic's card alone would be twice the price of an entire ps5, if not more.

@@Annoh89 with the amount of money resellers are trying to charge for a PS5 its close to a PC anyway. Why not invest in something better that can last longer and is upgradable?

Have Ubi released the patch?

@@TheGrillsVante yes, smooth 60fps now.

@@TheGrillsVante Yes. Yesteday released.

finally, i can focus playing it again now

Well if this game control is anything to go by nothing special, the pc settings for control are all low to medium to cant even go that low on pc, thats not me saying that its in digital foundry last video about this game and the developers told them that. Next gen my ass.

Have you tried it in multiplayer games as I turn off vibration in online games

The haptics feel very nicee

Yeah, instantly noticed them as well. A really pleasant surprise that sadly wasn't mentioned in the video.

how about the adaptive triggers? is it there?

The triggers felt kind of annoying to me. Like it was way too much resistance. When I'm supposed to be able to rapid fire the pistol.

Probably depends from case to case . I've completed the game on series x, and it crashed twice. Still not great, but not that critical.

@@oleksandr.liakhevych I wonder what’s going on, then. There are some topics on Reddit where people have the same complaints as I do. I was able to finish it and get all achievements an hour ago, but I avoided opening the game menu, because that’s what triggered my crashes. Maybe I had too much loot to handle? I don’t know.

I can confirm the crashes as an issue. Seem to be every 30-45mins for me after the first few missions, no particular trigger for them. Luckily I also have a PS5 so was able to switch to that version. 5hrs in and no crashes (also has haptic feedback on controller and auto-HDR enabled looks decent on quality mode)

@@oleksandr.liakhevych same here , i had like 3 crashes maybe but no problems, still going forward, i dont listen to that kind of people, maybe it is not working for ya but it works on my series x, when people will learn that not on every system bugs are appearing constantly, acting like they were born yesterday ffs

@@elusive_mg Hey, elusive, how are you doing? I hope you’re doing fine. I just wanted to warn people that the game that’s being charged AGAIN for those who bought in when it launched is not performing well. I think we should not give out our money to softhouses who clearly don’t respect their costumers and try to sell you something that is broken. Three crashes are still crashes. If you paid for the game, then an occasional crash is alright, but not every 15 minutes. My point is that people who have not bought it yet should be warned that their system could crash anytime till this game is patched. I’m really trying to help. If you don’t think my help is good for your case, just buy it anyways and keep having fun.

currently playing this at over 100fps with full ray tracing on PC

​@@purefoldnz3070 yeah great for you.! So sad that you must everbody thell i have a gaming pc and it hast more power as a 500€ maschine!, you are so a hero, please stay as you are.!

Seems they listened

It's clear now that MS guys did something wrong with the hardware! 90% of games run better on ps5. I think the 2,23 GHz are paying. Running 36 CU at 2,23 is more efficient than 52 at 1.825. Add to this the superior ssd and decompression solution on ps5.

@@zakixbox The Ssd isn't 2x faster though.. most the time it's not even 10%.

@@mazzalean077 wrong your only seen it as a loading tool, but the ps5s SSD is also used as fast VIRTUAL RAM and its unified giving this performance bust over the more powerful XSX! Mark cerny talked about it, and people laughed at him, well I think he got the last laugh!

​@@zakixbox Maybe it's the hardware. Time will tell. Especially when it comes to frames per second (Performance Mode) against visuals (Graphic Mode) the higher clock speed makes a difference and Ps5 is able to perform better. But on the other hand the graphic mode theoretically should perform better on the Series X (~40% more CU's and RT power ... in theory). Maybe it's still a lack of proper development tools or maybe the optimizing is not done well. Maybe the game was updated to the new generation consoles by having the PS5 in focus and then it was ported to the Xbox consoles (because on a first look a lot of the hardware is equal) but without taking care of the specific hardware properties of the Series X. It's only a guess but might be true because it's cheaper for the developer to update a game of the old generation mainly on on of the consoles and then porting it to the other console as their hardware is very similar this generation. A lot of "maybe"s and a lot of guessing. I'm neither a fanboy of the Playstation nor of the Series X but I try to be open minded and see the (technical) facts. People also point out the Kraken Compression on the Playstation and this one is definitely a big thing but on the other hand Microsoft has something similar available on the Series consoles (not exactly the same as their algorithm works different and focuses on textures). Well what i want to say .. the file size shouldn't vary that much as it currently does. This again leads to the guess that the game was not yet optimized on the Series X as good as it maybe was for the PS5. Maybe because the Developer-Kits still are a mess. I don't know. We will see. But definitley both consoles doing a great job and this generation (for me) is much more interesting and has a higher impact than last generation consoles.

@@zakixbox not really, 90% at launch but now most of games run better SeriesX some guys did follow up and pointed that, just because you didnt check follow ups dont make up your own conclusion

Nahh for camping games i prefer beauty

Definitely. You won't have time to examine the realistic reflections on the coffee mugs and desktops because you'll be too busy smashing all to pieces.

@@kaleidoskope4314 exactly. There’s lots of action on screen, particles, throwing things, turning the camera often. This is my first time playing control. I skipped it last gen because I didn’t want to play at 30fps. I tried graphics mode after about 2 hours of performance mode... I can’t do it lol. I don’t care how much nicer it looks lol.

@@KontryBoy706 Well enjoy it my friend it's a great game and at 60 fps should be sublime. I've already played it on PC but may play through it again now.

Same

Nah, lies G.

@@Ytnzy250 It's 100% percent true. I downloaded the game yesterday at 25gn

@@XxSupernatural21xX K. 👍

It’s called Kraken compression. Google it

Wait for VGTech video, he will expose DF

Good eyes

This guys are Sony sissy boys too they always talk good about the ps5 or ps4 I don't think they try to hide nothing tbis guys duck ok Sony small Japanese pipi hard like ign you sissy boys can't accept any defeat from xbox accept is a more powerful console is no way the ps5 js gonna best it it us what it is

@@w3r0ification can't understand what you wrote, you high or something?

@@waynepancy3169 is ok just keep on moving and try to learn how to read

And it's free on ps5!

@@alexperez1519 thats another bonus.

@@wizzenberry 27

I have Control Ultimate on Steam but it's at 40 gig. Compressed to 27 gig, that's quite impressive. I know the game files aren't directly comparable on a 1 to 1 scale but still that's pretty good.

@eel3161 the revolution tech was not just a faster ssd but incredibly fast IO throughput. You will probably see that tech in ratchet and clank. Its not far, you just have to be more patient

Yeah its very interesting i got the series x myself but im begining to think that third party developers will pick ps5 as the lead console to develope for and then port to xsx due to the fact that ps5 uses upgraded ps4 development tools therefore familiar territory and if thats the case its a shame that xbox wont be properly pushed outside of first party developers.

both of you are being stupid - did you think or feel the same when a One and ps4 game were the same, or whatever when that happened the gen before?

@Jason Yuen listen little kid...theres a big difference in beign stupid and having valid points or observations.Last gen ps4 was clearly the best performing machine from the get go until xbox one x. I prefer xbox over playstation i can tell you that much.Regarding Phil spencers "lies"...he didnt lie about the capabilities if the box its just devs are not pushing it and thats a fact as if right now...be an xbox fan not an xbot.

@Jason Yuen too bad you started with a good observation just to realize it was an ill intention comment...little fan boy.

@@americafirst.6554 haha whatever helps you sleep at night 🤣

From.other reviews and looking at it it seems to me that PS5 has higher detail in raytracing, reflections, and graphics.

Not only that, did you also know that the PS5 cooks your meals and cleans your dishes? Truly the power of the next gen SSD is unrivalled. Better luck next time Shitbox.

@@RahatAzim998 well seen how is shaming xbox so hard I will take your word for it!😂😂😂👍 Hey the tools are coming bro!🤷‍♂️⚒🛠

@@DualPurpose Lol no it doesn't.

@@DualPurpose Dont lie it doesnt

Still quite a ways to go for the full experience.

@@Kira-qc4qi such as?

@@glorious240fps6 it uses low raterization settings across the board and only a small selection of ray tracing features. Not starting a pc master race thing here but it's just a fact that Control is capable of looking and playing drastically better on PC than it does on the new consoles.

@@Kira-qc4qi a 1 year+ old last gen game that got splattered with RT on top of already unoptimized console port isn't really the new consoles' fault tbh. Remedy games are known for their broken games and lack of talent for optimization. This is just a lazy update for cashgrab. It's only worthy on ps5 bcz of being free on ps+. Otherwise i woudn't even waste a dime on this broken half baked port.

@@Kira-qc4qi the pc version with all the bells and whistles doesn’t compare to the new god of war patch!!!

Play on PC with ray-tracing and high fps. Gg.

@@eduardocampos-vr1wjtime to put my 4080 to work

Yeah your not the only one, multiple people have said the same. When it's playstation it's a hardware issue, when it's Xbox it's a tools or needs a patch, proper bias.

Because it’s true. Ps5 is weaker than Xbox.

@@bmdshred77 tflops, aren't the only thing that determines what console is best or better. So you truly believe that every time the xsx version of a 3rd party game has a shortcoming that it's a glitch or bug, but not when it's the same on ps5. Goddamn, talk about a double standard. You and they act like the kid on a playground whenever something dont go their way that must mean there was some unfairness happening because theres no way you could possibly be beaten, right? Listen, a game running better on one than the other doesnt have to do with just how powerful a console is. This gen so far should be proof of that. A game running better on the ps5 doesnt make the ps5 more powerful. It just makes it better for that game. And when a game runs worse on the xsx, doesnt make the xsx any less powerful, it just makes it the worse place to play that game of the two. Simple as that. You, and others, need to accept that the xsx will lose to the ps5 sometime and it doesnt mean there was a glitch or bug. It just means it got beat. As is evident so far.

John Linnemann is the best!

He's great! And Alex is the most overrated and partisan

@@parazels83 Linnemann WAS the best. Before his Sony’s licking madness started.

I like tom more that alex!!

What happened to the tools of the xbox that it will outperform ps5 massively!!

At 900p. Lol.

At £250 not bad going series S 👍

@@lastventure8377 really. It’s Nintendo switch or series s. Switch is fun in bursts but fails to keep me immersed for hours. They’re more of “mini games” to me

@@aemilianusmartinus5472 Why does it matter if its at 900p when most computer monitors people use are 1080p with high refresh rates as 1440p and above monitors are extremely overpriced and 4k ones don't make a big difference compared to 1440p

@@aemilianusmartinus5472 Doesn't look unplayable at 900p.

yes, exactly, and the price will be lower

Seems 1440p 60fps will be the best of both worlds for this gen

@@sean7332 and can even play at 120fps in multiplayer games

its the perfect choice for xbox series x but for ps5 the 4k 120hz monitor would be better since there is no support for 1440p

@@LouRaX hope PS5 get the support for 1440p too. Most 1440p monitors can receive 4k signal (mine can), the problem starts when you want to play at 120fps, need to select 1080p to do that. On Xbox is possible to play 1440p 120fps at the same time, thnks to the monitor support.

Just turn off motion blur.

Is not 4k

@@diegotm4365 it’s internal 1440 upscale to 4k

Watch the video maybe ? You'll have the answer

And replying to myself because I do that.. Thank goodness they have gone for 1440p. The visual difference between 1440p and 4K is minimal at best unless you side by side 6 inches from a 65inch screen.... Yet the performance hit of 4K, vs 1440p is UTTERLY STAGGERING. it's a damn shame 4K is such a marketing tool, 1440p leaves headroom for an ASTOUNDING amount of graphical eye candy.. What do you think DF? You know I'm right! ;D

I agree. Runs perfect on my XSX and LG CX. I know everyone does not have this but you get what you pay for. Invest in a VRR capable display.

still bad to see this because it just shows how developing on the xsx is hard compared to ps5. like it’s not the consoles fault but more like the tools that developers get from microsoft

Lol or get a PS5 and not worry about useless features meant for people okay with lesser performance

Yeah it's like playing a broken game in comparison

Will try 60. Currently with RT. Just admiring the game

i just gave up on that and payed 760€ but i got 600€ for my series X i got preordert :D

@@LouRaX in India it launched today instead of November 2020 and out of stock in less than 2 minutes xD

PS5 will be around until at least 2027, You have time.

hey, can we play the control we get from ps plus on ps4?

@@navasheen8964 nope

Both but it’s a 26 gb download on PS5 vs 45 gb download on Series