What about for single men that haven't had female touch for years let alone sex? .... What about men who are disabled? etc. Why does sex have to be a vulgar thing even? With two agreeing adults.... who are you to object to their arrangement? But Sugar daddies are fine I guess?

So the wokers at mcdonalds who dont want to work there but need the money are slaves by consent

@@AussieAmigan sugar daddies are absolutely not fine and only a women with no self worth would come up with a price in exchange for an unwanted sexual act. Sex that is based of a genuine connect even without commitment is absolutely not vulgar.. Can you clarify your statement or question about disabled men or men who have not had physical touch?

@@tjj9737 I think you could be conflating sex with love. Men typically don't do that and neither do the women you and Sadie appear to be worried about. Sex in itself is NOT based on a genuine connection. Where on earth did people get that idea? Romance novels? Regardless of what many may feel is immoral, people frequently hook up for casual sex and affairs. Reality doesn't care about your feelings. In fact, outside of casual sex encounters all sex is transactional. If you have to buy a girl dinner, it is transactional. If you believe in no sex before marriage, then marriage is the price men pay for sex, and therefore transactional. Most women withhold sex until there is a transaction, as they should, but in the end it's only a matter of cost. As 99% of women can have sex on demand if they want to, and frequently do these days, why therefore, should a sugar daddy, an involuntary celibate, a disabled person, or anyone at all with money, be left out of having sex, just because of some perceived harm you may feel is being perpetrated, despite it being a perfectly valid transaction between two consenting adults. One, I might add, that is not necessarily dis-pleasurable to either party and typically far from rape. These men are effectively putting dinner on the table for the girl are they not? What I feel many are just objecting to is the girl's lifestyle, based on their own perception of morality, despite the transactional nature of sex being only a matter of degree. And it would seem that proponents of the morality message don't want the girls to charge less, they actually want them to charge more. To place a higher value on sex. The highest being marriage and the risk, mostly to men therein, of it failing predominantly due to the unrealistic expectations of women and the feminist ideals they ascribe to. How is it "preying" if the person advertised? It is therefore not an unwanted sexual act AT ALL. The sex worker has weighed the cost vs the advantage as most women do in ANY relationship. It would appear that no one is forcing them. If they've got a high body count already, and have effectively been giving sex away for free, and if they aren't picky, they figure, why not make some money out of the act. Judging by the sex workers and 304s I frequently see on dating shows, the common takeaway is that the sex workers have an overly inflated sense of self worth and make the "Johns" and "Simps" pay through the nose for it. They even appear to be giddy to tell you how much they are enjoying life. If the tables were turned and guys could do sex work with as much frequency, they probably would too. It's the women thinking about sex like men that appears to be what many object to. Blame feminism. The women changed and the men merely adapted, and as the VAST majority of men have been cast as involuntarily celibate now due to hypergamy, the men are the actual victims and being taken advantage of. I'm definitely not portraying promiscuity for either sex as a preferred lifestyle, I'm just saying it's sad that society has come to this.

@@tjj9737Well, I wrote a long and detailed reply to you which has been deleted so.... Edit: Hmmm... Maybe it was too long and got rejected by YT. Let me try and break it up. Funnily enough I accidentally kept the tab open so here it is. Let's see if YT accepts it.

I agree. An emotional mature man would seek counsel to repair his marriage or get a divorce.

You’re part of the problem

🌹

I agree. To me, it's like you want to punish the drug addict for purchasing the drugs more than the drug dealer. I don't get that logic.

I totally get your reaction but I ask that you watch the video again and take note of two very important points. 1. In Sadia's experience as a professional, ONLY people who are emotionally compromised or financially desperate (and in turn, again, emotionally compromised) end up as sex workers. 2. The effects of sex work are INCREDIBLY and DEEPLY damaging to everyone involved in it and in particular, the women. Most everyone would consider having sex with someone who is emotionally/mentally compromised to be sexual coercion, at the very least, and so it's not that far of a leap to understand the comparison to rape. These people are not operating with a full deck of cards and many because of circumstances outside of their control like childhood trauma. So, it begs the question, is damaging these women further really worth it to satisfy a man who can't get sex from his wife? Sadia isn't saying lock all of these people up. I think she's asking us to understand the reality of those who end up as sex workers, the actual damage being done, and that we choose do better as a society. @shinzo0mega the logic is not that women are the drug dealer but rather, that they're the drug. They're being snorted and cast aside like a used needle.

@@neutechnica thank you this was explained in more depth & I see what you are saying. It sounds heartless of me to say it however, it is still the persons choice to go that way. Regardless of being emotionally damaged & in poor financial situation. Many people have these problems. Who doesn’t have childhood trauma & finance issues. It all comes down to choice. How does she choose to pull herself out of this finance mess? Is she depressed & sees no other way then to decide to have sex for money? There are many other options but again even if you are emotionally ruined, she still chose to dig her souls sadness a little deeper & have sex for money. But look, I know there’d be people who may be a little too far gone mentally to help themselves decipher their options.. it’s an interesting discussion. I adore Sadia though. She is brilliant.

@@Houseofmirrorstarot but if u have a mistress, ethics are already out the window haha

@@tlungu962 depends on the perception seered from

Mistress is not a one time. It's in place of a wife who no longer holds appeal and it's not possible to get a second wife or the guy doesn't want to for legal or inheritance reasons. But it's an exclusive relationship where the woman doesn't need to be concerned about getting another guy for paying her bills. It's kind of stable. Of course can't work for poor guys who just need a one time whenever

​@@RummanaMoledina what you just explained was a higher end escort. It's like renting a car you can rent for a day or hours or months or years. It's still a car rental just a bigger bill when you return the car to the shop......

@@Dogdad-333 yes it's invariably the best paying job that women can get. Even a wife belongs in the same category only thing she doesnt have her own money till she divorces the guy and claims alimony and child support.

Could be some psychology behind her choice in words.

The sex worker wants your money to survive if you think it's anything else you are delusional.

@@lahicks9773 Never put I thought it was something else. I'm not sure what your point is. I was referring to the word rape

well said .. except during the crack epidemic they blamed the users & jailed them (blacks) not the dealers (US Gov)

​@@tlungu962 and now it's an "epidemic" smh

An unbearable kinda love … 🙊

addiction? sick bro.

Rewatch it, she doesn’t advise men to get a mistress she’s saying a less demented male will choose a mistress (who they build an emotional bond with) versus paying for a prostitution which essentially is sexual assault because the woman doesn’t want to have sex still and the man view her as an object to be used.

@@pupplylove3003So a married man forming an emotional bond with another woman, rather than having meaningless sex with a random is a good thing? Ummm... No. That's more unforgivable. She's wrong.

Further, it is a matter of intent. Does the man crave merely sex, or does the man crave both an emotional bond and sex, OUTSIDE HIS MARRIAGE. The former is a disposable service to the man, practically akin to getting a massage or a lap dance for the man, and the latter is a double wammy to the marriage as it is more of a substitute for major aspects of the marriage.

Yeah, I've already unsubbed. She said a few based things in the past, but she's showing that was a fluke.

The first of what I fear will be a series of bad takes. I just unsubbed.

Yeah, some ppl don't want to get to know you in order to have sex, might as well pay for it. Plus if she doesn't want you she says no and that's it. You cannot meet her if she doesn't allow you to meet her in the first place 😂

Or even marriage.....Morality....apparently.

Undue pressure, starvation and undue influence of all no contract.

You feel offended because you do it. It’s okay bro, repent.

How gullible are you 😅

She says something worthwhile a third of the time

yup this is a L take from her

You all should stop paying for only fans. You won’t feel so offended