In the wild?

you lucky! in which zone?

@@biokosmos probably10 plus

@@biokosmos I lived in the south near the border with Panama at a beach called Pavones then in the mountains near San Vito, also by the southern border.

@@introtwerp I lived in houses but I had wild animals come in lots of times. Bugs, bats, tarantulas, other spiders, iguanas, toads, geckos, lizards, frogs, snakes, hummingbirds, crabs, an opossum and other animals all came in over the years in different houses. Once we had army ants come clean the house but we had to leave for the day and a night. None of it bothered me, I wish I still lived there. I'll take wild animals over city people anytime.

Can address him slightly more respectfully with a prefix or a suffix like Sir, さん, ji wikipedia.org/wiki/-ji or something similar.

@@sailaab I'm an American and we wouldn't address Horatio Nelson as 'Sir'.

@@sailaab Americans have a lack of respect, for anyone that is not from the USA themselves, for half of there own population...funny, especially in this scenario, considering the vast majority of their forebears originated from the UK 🤦🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️😂 the rest were enslaved Africans, (see, no respect there, let's just enslave an entire race), and the rest were the natives they were able to assimilate.

I agree 💯%

What evolution? Bro it's 2023 not 1923 evolution is not a real world process it doesn't exist lol. Mindless matter and mutation can't produce code. Mind is the paradigm of creation in reality, not magic. Evolutionary theory is a mythology of magic, rationality from irrationality. Mind>magic

Can you please explain your comment? Im curious

@@tomasnovotny8526 Sure. Evolution doesn't work, it has countless foundational critical issues, and biologists have been trying to wholly replace the model for awhile now. There was a big conference on it back in 2016. I'll help you out further. Renowned biologist Denis Noble has given the explicit statement and given evidence for it "neo Darwinism doesn't need to be supplemented or extended, it needs to be replaced because it's completely inadequate. Why because scientists are beginning to see levels of complexity way beyond just the complexity of DNA, like epigenetic complexity." Genomes don't improve over time they degrade. Virus data like John Sanford on H1N1 the spanish flu shows this. Human genome from encode has shown every generation humans have 100 mutations. The only nobel laureate in the field Hermann J. Muller said just 1 mutation per generation in humans means there is no evolution explanation humanity is progressing in the opposite direction 1 per generation is deadly, yet we find out the number is 100. The human genome is degrading not progressing to a better state. This shouldn't be a shock, as information theory states information degrades, and information is the basis of life. All the beneficial mutations in biology like the famous citrate metabolism in ecoli or antibiotic resistance are not from gain or improvement in genetic information, but reductive evolution. A degrading or loss of information crippling a function in the organism that produces a beneficial effect while still being a loss of genetic function. As the famous Lenski experiment showed. There is no evolutionary pressure to create building blocks of mechanisms that don't yet exist. Evolution does not have foresight. Mindless matter and mutation can't manifest code. That's rationality from irrationality. That's a reality breaking concept. If you can get such a deus ex machina mechanism that does that it invalidates all human achievement and personhood because then the universe did it all. This is why the multiverse theory is so absurd. This is why all of naturalism is absurd because it's predicated on such a deus ex machina mechanism that does not exist. Darwin's Origin never explains the origin of species -- and this is stated by David Berlinski no less. How does chance determine when to stop at the "desired" outcome? The concept of evolution is nonsense. It's not even falsifiable(all results explainable and not reproducible) so really shouldn't even be called a scientific theory. It fits the criteria for being defined as mythology ironically. Could also point out y chromosome adam and mitochondrial eve data shows humans had two ancestors and did not evolve. Shocker the dating is roughly 6000-7500 years just like the biblical genealogy dating going back to Eden, and the dating is quite accurate in a general sense as it's just averaging mutations per generation then counting back to when they stop appearing. The list goes on and on and on. We could go into the Cambrian explosion evidence of countless biological structures such as virtually every eye design and body plan allowed by physics showing up in a geological instant no evolution, we could show random number generator studies for probability of words/language manifesting, or a study on evolutionary probability of extinction of over 5000 mammal species related to size increases showing mammals can't evolutionary evolve over 3kg. Darwinian evolution is a mythology of magic(rationality from irrationality), it's pseudo science and also invokes time of the gaps and god of the gaps along with all the other issues no less.

I agree 💯 percent and I love watching and listening to him

and a voice I could listen to for hours, fascinating guy! ❤

Sir David, he's earned the respect....

Hes like an ancient philosopher walking around explaining subjects while us like pupils following him around.

Nuclear attack of tree-sperm.

Creating jizz-congested humans.

Makes me sneeze in the morning like some mad cow... 😥

And Richard ... Tucson Arizona Sonoran desert 🏜️🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🌜🇺🇲🐻🌍🌵🍄🍄🍄🍄

Well said

Mine too

They wanted to make a short video (bite) based on a longer video ...

But he doesn't know who MADE THEM! (Genesis 1:1).

Please, more on this topic!

🤔

Catasetums are relatively common in cultivation worldwide and are not too fussy in their requirements so you can own one without too much trouble.

They just don't know. The individuals who developed a better scent just happened to reproduce more often

They didn't know. As they reproduced they had random mutations, some of which made them better at attracting specific kinds of bugs. The bugs pollinated the one's they preferred, resulting in this specialization.

They probably coevolved together over many years as well as they both began developing scents.

Either that, or it returns the bee's lick, and then detaches its tongue 😝

They evolve together very slowly by tiny incremental changes. Whatever is more efficient for genes spreading is selected. There can be a lot of other factors at play all at the same time.

Nature is working on everything at once, transforming. How did eucalyptus trees know koalas need them to survive? How did the anteater and ant come to be? Nature is making the tweaks, as necessary. It’s not a “conscious” decision by the plants. You and I are even changing, with each new replica of ourselves. That’s because the environment outside of us does not remain the same. It’s probably why we have lifespans like we do - rebooting in our reproduction.

yeah but He also created tumors, farts and Kim Kardashian. So perhaps go easy on the praise.

​@@mathieuL2204😂😂😂😂😂