70 million is not a waste, there will always be losses in scientific progress. It not finding anything puts us further on the right track. It shouldn't be perceived as a bad venture.
@henryseldon60775 жыл бұрын
That means all the test flights done to learn how to build and fly a plane were a waste of money.
@McC1oudv25 жыл бұрын
You may have misread me Henry. I forgive you.
@gnryushi5 жыл бұрын
It is a waste. Especially if it was funded by gov't money that means it was tax dollars taken out of someone's earnings that could've been put to better use. Like a person feeding their own kids.
@proksenospapias93275 жыл бұрын
@@gnryushi This money was used to pay scientists, pay technicians pay the truck drivers that moved the equipment, pay a billion different things. There's is absolutely no such thing as "wasted money" on an experiment, unless we're talking about corruption. Wasted is the money that ends up in the pocket of a single person and doesn't circulate in the market anymore.
@chadasonmcgraw80975 жыл бұрын
Economics is an interesting topic that will say the exact opposite of what you said. Opportunity cost alone would say that this venture is only going to take away from the other technologies that we can build to figure this out for us. It doesn't matter who is fitting the bill, what matters is how does it help us advance and grow wealthier. NASA needs to pay its employees, and countries need to be able to support their people.
@BaldingClamydia5 жыл бұрын
Anton seems like such a nice person. I'm glad he's around 😆💜
@tahititoutou38024 жыл бұрын
He is a "wonderful person".
@olyviero4 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how obvious it is ! Thanks Anton ! So good to feel ourselves out of the "KZfaq way of doing" not to say "way of begging". You're passionate, and that's the thing !
@solapowsj253 жыл бұрын
Cheers🍻🍻🍻🍻for a wonderful person.
@deltaacegaming39342 жыл бұрын
Met him in real life, he's a g
@Mauipat5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the insight Anton, and to those of you with negative comments below, If you don't actually have the answer then don't give Anton a hard time. He didn't say he had the answer. He's just passing on the information. Lets see where this takes us.
@frankkleij91495 жыл бұрын
He is lying between his teeth from his first video on !!!
@edwarddelaire14955 жыл бұрын
@Donald Kasper you dont seem to grasp the actual research around what you are saying. in short - you are high on something and havent done the research. there is a ton of proof and actual evidence of what you are questioning. you just dont know it.
@jazz219774 жыл бұрын
Don't be so hard on the people with negative comments... they probably don't have the mental capacity to understand any of it, and thus get bored ;P
@dominiccanis4065 жыл бұрын
If attractive Gravity is caused by matter interacting with a higher dimensional field, why can't something with the opposite effect be true considering all the naturally opposing particles we have observed?
@P8qzxnxfP85xZ2H3wDRV5 жыл бұрын
This train of thought is actually what some physicists employed in the mid 20th century, when they tried to come up with a unified theory for electromagnetism and gravity.
@dailytact13704 жыл бұрын
@MyricalLyrical Nice appeal to authority fallacy you got going there. If washing your hands before surgery prevent infection then why did all the top surgeons refuse to wash their hands and dismiss the very notion as ridiculous?
@Skylancer7274 жыл бұрын
@@dailytact1370 Because they had gloves over their unwashed hands. XD
@Yarblocosifilitico4 жыл бұрын
look up the Electric Univere theory, it's very discredited but I'm convinced they're onto something (it has more predictive power than the current model lately)
@jackrobinson94034 жыл бұрын
@@Skylancer727 no,ppl died
@abserk5 жыл бұрын
hello wonderful anton, this is person
@awesomefacepalm5 жыл бұрын
hello anton person, this is wonderful
@masterchef11745 жыл бұрын
@Shapes hello wonderful roads, this is country
@zatcharybelltucker7355 жыл бұрын
@@masterchef1174 Hello MasterChef 117, this is GORDON RAMSAY.
@masterchef11745 жыл бұрын
@@zatcharybelltucker735 oh shit
@hansmartinkorgerud97675 жыл бұрын
Hello wonderful person, this is road country
@Blockinstaller125 жыл бұрын
So, darkmatter could be described as a negative mass "fluid"? That makes calling spacecraft "Ships" make even more sense!
@PTSDSquirrel5 жыл бұрын
Aetherium
@ComatoseMN5 жыл бұрын
Great... The Double Dark Slit Matter Experiment... Peoples heads are about to blow clean off their shoulders.... >M
@Mr_Wh15 жыл бұрын
It should be called "space submarine".
@UnitSe7en5 жыл бұрын
No. It's not a fluid - Just to clear up any misconception in anyone's minds. We are not about to find Species 8472 and Electric Universe theory is stupid. It might act like a fluid in a similar way as air is also a fluid (But for different reasons) - But so do most large masses of anything in the universe.
@ShifuCareaga5 жыл бұрын
wtf are you talking about. this isn't Star Trek, this is real life.
@sirorlandodecorsica62105 жыл бұрын
Several hundred million? Waste? What are you talking about. Have you seen the US national debt? Now that's astronomical.
@foxleo67295 жыл бұрын
Funny part is that like 2/3rds of the debt is between different branches of govt and the public.
@Leispada5 жыл бұрын
@Adam N Capitalism is not Materialism, I believe. And he did say materialism
@deathbydeviceable4 жыл бұрын
@@Leispada but you need materialism for capitalism to work, something needs to be exploited. US exploits oil. Then again you need to exploit something in comm/socialism, only difference is they exploit it's people to work
@peppermintgal43024 жыл бұрын
@@deathbydeviceable Monasteries, worker coops, and some small businesses are communist in nature, as was the peasantry before feudalism... and quite honestly, families can be a little communist in nature, especially extended family units, though you don't see those in our more atomized, industrial societies. Certainly not all are/were great places to be: some small businesses, worker coops, and families can get rather dramatic in interpersonal relationships, monasteries can be inhabited by misanthropic recluses or run by cult leaders, and the peasantry ultimately could not fend off the rising feudal empires and protect the common lands from the bandits who would become the early militias. But I wouldn't argue that any are inherently exploitative. I think what's really exploitative is imperialism and elitism. The large scale communist movements saw little success in the face of efforts to break them up by the industrial titans they opposed, and gave in to a sort of misanthropic view of the working class they were beholden to, and so power in these movements was concentrated into the hands of a small number of leaders. In other words, they became imperialist. I would argue that Capitalism is *inherently* imperialist, as it favors the establishment of a wealthy class, who will inevitably fund a military caste of some kind to protect their wealth, and true or not, that has certainly been the precedent set by history. I think whatever the case is, though, that the primary enemy of humanity is a some abstract ideology concerned with intangibles like market forces, but our human tendency towards misanthropy. Any political movement, if it is to be truly freeing, must be one that does not give in to cynicism.
@peppermintgal43024 жыл бұрын
@@Leispada Exactly. If capitalists are materialist, then communism is capitalist. Most communists are materialist. Materialism is the concern with what actually happens over intangible ideals. In that way, materialism is not so much opposed to spiritualism as it is to idealism in general. Marx took Hegel's idealist dialectic method and made it materialist. Hegel asserted that lifestyle, the material, was inspired by ideology, the ideal. Essentially, that we decide, based on out values, how we make our way in the world. Marx reversed this formula, saying that rather, we form our values to justify to justify the sacrifices we make to survive. In other words, our ideology, the ideal, follows after lifestyle, the material. This notion served as a not entirely insignificant part of the bedrock of communism.
@tylerpedigo29383 жыл бұрын
I just flipped through the paper rather quickly and I can say this is the most compelling theory I’ve ever heard for dark energy, and it has completely made me reevaluate my position on the “Big Crunch” theory. This is mind blowing, and I really think Farnes’ theory makes the most sense by a long shot.
@joeyortega11379 ай бұрын
IiiCookieCookieCookieCooki
@bazpearce99935 жыл бұрын
Compared to all that crazy military spending. A few hundred million on dark matter is peanuts.
@elodens45 жыл бұрын
The point was that it could have been spent on other scientific experiments.
@bazpearce99935 жыл бұрын
@@elodens4 That's a valid point. But if the US govt would allow NGT's suggestion of increasing from 0.5% of the budget to 1%. Then the dark matter spendings would not seem so drastic.
@elodens45 жыл бұрын
@@bazpearce9993 Yes, a few hundred million really isn't very much, but that isn't the cumulative total. The issue of waste is interesting in this case with re: to how simple the solution to dark energy/matter could actually end up being. Because it's not like the idea of negative gravitational mass wasn't known as a possible avenue to explore. The other thing to keep in mind in all this is how to get the public onboard with future science funding. I'm not sure that the hunt for dark matter lends to a perception that prior dollars have been well spent...
@AKlover5 жыл бұрын
Want funding than create Utility/Value. It's that cut and dry. Spitballing unfocused research with no clear end goal doesn't produce shit 99.9% of the time.
@woahcalmdown50395 жыл бұрын
@@elodens4 But how many of these other experiments are even valuable enough to answer with that amount of money? Even if they don't find dark matter at all it's still a great contribution since most our mathematical theories would change (atleast the ones that have been telling us dark matter should be there)
@08wolfeyes5 жыл бұрын
" The force is made by all living things" " It surrounds us, penetrates us, it's what binds the galaxy together."
@chrisferguson97875 жыл бұрын
isnt negative mass the missing ingredient to several "warp drives"???
@SoochiGaming5 жыл бұрын
negative energy used to stabilize worm holes i think thats what u mean
@lenonkitchens77275 жыл бұрын
@@SoochiGaming No, he's right. The Alcubierre warp drive requires negative mass. I'm not sure what else it requires, or how much negative mass, but mathmatically, it definitely requires some negative mass.
@teebow33695 жыл бұрын
@KRYMauL Mammals use negative pressure to suck air in, fwiw
@Scorch4285 жыл бұрын
@@teebow3369 like my gf does on me?
@dailytact13704 жыл бұрын
@@teebow3369 That would be negative relative pressure, they are talking about negative absolute pressure.
@MeAtHome55 жыл бұрын
Better spent on making cool science stuff than more wars and devastation.
@tamaramladenovic175 жыл бұрын
Very true
@isnow82785 жыл бұрын
Gotta keep those mug heads from comin' over the hill, jack! Science is nice, but worthless when you're at the end of the muzzle with jimmys jumping out of the trees.
@jazz219774 жыл бұрын
Let's all - and I'm going out on a limb here - develop as a species and learn to get along.... Yeah, seems like a great plan. (don't read in sarcastic voice)
@JamesTaylor-on9nz4 жыл бұрын
@@jazz21977 And why don't lions just get along with gazelles and wolves get along with sheep? Truly big brain thoughts
@tyriall14 жыл бұрын
well , in a way , wars have pushed science forward , so yeah
@Mr6Sinner5 жыл бұрын
I almost didn’t open this video because the title looks like some Buzzfeed-esque clickbait lol
@ahall98395 жыл бұрын
it is
@Jadinandrews5 жыл бұрын
esque
@Mr6Sinner5 жыл бұрын
Jadin Andrews Thank you
@dougreimer29125 жыл бұрын
So then you have not watched Anton before..time to sub.
@marklewis47935 жыл бұрын
thanx 4 warning@@ahall9839
@sithounetsith98775 жыл бұрын
If he is right, he could win the next nobel physics prize.
@the_astrokhan5 жыл бұрын
and put us on the way towards real anti gravity...
@David-zy1lr5 жыл бұрын
@@the_astrokhan Imagine launching rockets without fuel...
@oneofmanyparadoxfans54475 жыл бұрын
@@David-zy1lr Launching rockets without fuel? Elon Musk is definitely going to be interested when he gets wind of this.
@kirbyarmstrong91745 жыл бұрын
Well, it's not like we can start blasting anti matter out of the bottom of rockets. Anti gravity is more about magnetism than antimatter.
@oneofmanyparadoxfans54475 жыл бұрын
@Yeoss :3 What's so funny?
@padraiggluck56334 жыл бұрын
“Constantly replenished” sounds suspiciously like Hoyle’s steady-state universe.
@Electronics615 жыл бұрын
Anton to date I think this is the most promising idea. As you were presenting the video I was already thinking in terms negative mass and it's interaction with itself and with positive mass using simple universal gravitational law. Finally never feel regrets. All work is step in the right direction. Failures finally point us the right direction.
@yippikahyey5 жыл бұрын
That means warp drive
@buddy53355 жыл бұрын
I will settle for a hoverboard.
@Gretchen19785 жыл бұрын
generate kugelblitz black holes in both positive and negative mass variants. tune the geometry, done.
@funestis5 жыл бұрын
Brake in to the Bulk, escape the end of the Universe!
@thatdutchguy28825 жыл бұрын
Not with these currently energy prices m8 ;).
@johncgibson47205 жыл бұрын
And wormholes and time travel.
@Letgoit25 жыл бұрын
70 million is not much if u compare the US military Budget
@eachday95385 жыл бұрын
The cost of a single Joint Strike Fighter aircraft
@naughtyotter55475 жыл бұрын
712 Billion dollars a year lol
@trelligan425 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many hundreds of millions the Square Kilometer Array will cost?
@ralphclark5 жыл бұрын
Terry Smithwick it doesn't matter what the square kilometre array costs, we need it.
@Pyroguy925 жыл бұрын
@@trelligan42how about 1/6 the cost of a single aircraft carrier and in return, a much improved understanding of the universe and not to mention all of the technological advancements that will trickle down and become luxuries that we all take for granted.
@SLAMSTERDAMN5 жыл бұрын
Wowza, if said Scientist is correct in his theories, he’s THE ‘Wonderful Person’! ✨
@JimmyJames801004 жыл бұрын
All this has already been done and proved by a french scientist called Jean Pierre Petit since more than 20 years but no scientists wanted to take care of his works...this is not new at all!!
@rodri_merli275 жыл бұрын
If that's the answer I would really find it amazing, marvellous, wonderful! Such a simple sollution for a mind-boggling problem that has been around for a few decades.
@premsqueehoomstock44514 жыл бұрын
Interesting! That answers my question pretty well from one of my previous comments. It WAS anti-gravity! But anti-gravity doesn't seem to work the way that I would have assumed that it would. It does make a lot of sense though, the second force should have its mirror! The oil analogy is almost perfect, but its missing something.. Because oil does repel water by its nature, so it just sits on top. Hydrophobic lipids and all. But this seems like it acts more like two cohesive fluids, occupying the same general space as its counterpart without either effecting the other in any extreme way. Rather serving to bind each other in place to an extent. I also think that using only acceleration and the force of gravity as the qualifiers for the interaction of the particles is a mistake. Yes, they are moving in the same direction, but at the same time they're repelled from collapse. So there must be another force involved. Its like the vacuum of space creates a constant tension that's difficult to overcome without much energy. Very similar to the way that I imagine electron clouds exist around atoms, but slowed down by 1,000,000,000% I find it very difficult to believe that negative mass is generated out of nothingness. Mass-energy equivalency should work the same on dark particles as it does on visible ones. I'd wager that there's a sort of balancing act with the amount of matter (both types), such that when two opposite particles meet they are obliterated. Then, in that vacuum of energy, an equivalent amount of mass is re-distributed into the fabric of the universe. So in a way, saying that the universe has a way of generating dark matter from nothing isn't wrong, but the same applies to normal matter in that situation. Seems to be, we're just missing a variable. There's got to be a pressure that prevents the immediate collapse of the universe and maintains balance between the two to a degree. Thank you so much for making such thought-provoking videos Anton! Much appreciated :D
@tylerpedigo29383 жыл бұрын
Most well thought out comment here. Thank you
@mishafinadorin80493 жыл бұрын
Take some haloperidol
@Curry-tan-5 жыл бұрын
Please keep us updated, wonderful Anton. You can delve into a few facets of the source paper in more depth for another video and we'll be happy. Perhaps explain some of the predictions like CMB looking different because sound waves in the early plasma would be different. Also some of the implications that would be lovely: such as breaking the Hubble Constant puts us in a cyclic universe (of maybe only ~105 billion years) because the negative curvature will make things collapse. I think you're good at simplifying things so go deep as you like.
@scifieric4 жыл бұрын
Mr. Petrov, your videos are always informative and I appreciate that you provide links to the papers that you reference. I absolutely love the visual representation provided by this particular scientist. It certainly does seem to create something that is representative of our universe. Very exciting stuff! Keep up the great work.
@dougfry24775 жыл бұрын
This is very exciting! By far the best possible description and explanation I have ever heard or read on the subject of dark matter. So, I am looking forward in seeing how it all plays out, and with great hope that Dr. Farnes' theory is correct and is eventually accepted by the scientific community. @Anton Nicely done on your presentation, "as usual". It's why I keep coming back for more.
@asiastreets40325 жыл бұрын
Think dark energy is just tops of the gravitation fields. Like mass make dips in the gravitation fields,
@tomsmarkovs19463 жыл бұрын
yeah. . some how dark matter particles sound wrong. .
@ellesmerewildwood48585 жыл бұрын
I lost him after, "Hello wonderful person." :o)
@claushellsing5 жыл бұрын
I think this guy nail it, his explanation is so symetrical, elagant. Because his theory could also explain dark energy
@das_it_mane4 жыл бұрын
Man I really appreciate the videos. Thank you
@i_am_anxious02475 жыл бұрын
Pre-watching; this could be a big deal
@mathewhale35815 жыл бұрын
'Draw a little minus in the math' That's what Maxwell did to electro(-)magnetism
@twintwix1234567895 жыл бұрын
So where there is no mass, there is the lack of mass, and in the lack of mass, there are electrons. So electrons are negative mass, yes? I mean, electricity is not physical, but it affects physical. We can see light from electricity, so that proves that it is the hand of God or the hand of Consciousness, which is said to be surrounded by a ring of angels (loving light, or pure positive energy). Much like the universe. It is just thought energy affecting the development and evolution of the physical universe mirror reflecting the creation of the thought energy?
@Yarblocosifilitico4 жыл бұрын
@@twintwix123456789 'thought energy' is electricity. Ain't that how brain cells and synapses work? (I'm no expert as you can see). What if mass is positive charge and antimatter (dark matter, dark energy, dark force if they want to add it...) is negative charge. All in the same medium, with current of energy going from pole to pole in many ways at many scales. If interested, look up the Thunderbolts Project (maybe youtube got you there already, sounds like you'd like it) Also, have you noticed that a brain map of the connections looks very similar to a connection map of the universe? (I'm not sure what the 'connection' here was, but I could look it up) Goes well with your theologic interpretation, which I don't share but I do find interesting.
@twintwix1234567894 жыл бұрын
@@Yarblocosifilitico Every thought that you think, has an energetic relationship with your own greater knowing of your own greater non-physical consciousness, that can be defined as emotion. Mind working together with the emotion, is how knowledge is achieved.
@Yarblocosifilitico4 жыл бұрын
@@twintwix123456789 Definetely agree with the second sentence, not so sure about the first one, but I can relate to the idea
@pedrogouveia43264 жыл бұрын
And just like matter, woowoo and bullshit clumps together.... In the deep areas of the coment section
@DaxSass5 жыл бұрын
I had proposed about 2 yrs ago that what we can detect as baryonic matter/energy is one kind of energy and dark energy is another kind of energy, incompatible like oil and water. And like oil in water, oil tends to clump together and will move toward each other and even merge much like galaxies and black hole mergers. The dark matter measured is just the tension that keep oil and water apart so that even if an oil drop were to spin super fast, it would still stay together, like galaxies spinning faster than their gravity holding them together. The oil and water is just an analogy, since they are both made from same energy form, while my 2 proposed energies are not just different forms of same energy but completely different energies. They dont interact with each other in any way, no friction, no exchange of energy, not even gravitational energy. They are just incompatible (at the macro level, however, they may somewhat interact at the quantum level). Since we are made up of only one energy, live only in one energy form, we cannot detect the other energy form(s). I know it is so much like introducing a god complex to explain the unexplainable, lol. But then I am not an accredited scientist.
@yuotwob30914 жыл бұрын
'Can you tell what it is yet?' This is a refreshingly open minded video, bearing that in mind, galaxies are vast and the stars spread out, but at distance their light is more coherent and the distances could be mitigated. Consider that a galaxy is surrounded by stars in contrast to a planetary system, so without breaking any rules the attraction of a bracelet of bodies to one another would contract that bracelet or maintain its radius against a faster rotation period. How does the system accelerate up to super-rotation speed? That is another question.
@RaymarFootball5 жыл бұрын
Got an ad and watched the whole thing for support. Amazing vids man
@paulwalsh23445 жыл бұрын
I did too. Any little bit to help a great channel.
@melody37415 жыл бұрын
You have to click or they dont get money.
@johnkenley46873 жыл бұрын
@@melody3741 this is a lie. They get ad revenue just from the ad being viewed. Even if its skipped they get recieve ad revenue. They just have to be recieving $100 or more for them to actually collect any money from it.
@tassiokaname9355 жыл бұрын
I've just read a little bit about it on the book We have no idea, by Jorge Cham and Daniel Whiteson. I'm on the page 247 and in that chapter they explain what we've known about this subject so far. I really recommend this book for you guys!
@Ed1Ward5 жыл бұрын
Noted on my book buy list. Thanks.
@RayVision3D Жыл бұрын
It's like the old saying, "The fish doesn't notice the water until it's placed on dry land."
@ianwilkinson46024 жыл бұрын
In the same way as magnets, like poles repel, whereas mixed poles attract.
@user-hc4wi9ks9r4 жыл бұрын
Not exactly the same - that's the funny thing: positive masses attract, negative repel, and negative mass “chases after” positive which “runs away” from it. At 8:08 you can see that the forces' directions are opposite to the case of magnets. But because - to get the acceleration - you have to divide by mass, negative mass matter ends up moving against the force it's experiencing.
@kornami86785 жыл бұрын
Just when we thought we had it all figured out and then someone discovers that the Big Bang expansion is actually accelerating. LoL! It's like someone keeps moving the finishing line further away.
@Robin...2225 жыл бұрын
Whe never thought we all figured it out. LoL!
@Exoneos5 жыл бұрын
So Dark Matter kinda works like cement ? Holding things together.
@melvinjansen23385 жыл бұрын
Cement doesn't move.
@paulwalsh23445 жыл бұрын
I see it more as a 3 dimensional matrix like unbaked bread dough that the conditions of this universe enable to rise and bake... expanding in all directions simultaneously and that ordinary Positive Matter is like raisins in that dough. The dough expands exponentially compared to the raisins, which hardly expand at all but are carried along with the expanding dough away from other raisins in the dough. A good loaf of raisin bread rises and bakes uniformly throughout, but it takes skill and good baking instructions to achieve this. If the oven is too hot, then the moisture in the dough expands and rises non-uniformly leaving bubbles and voids in the bread. If the oven is not hot enough, then parts of the loaf are left doughy and uncooked. So the field conditions of our universe may be such that the conditions that led to a uniform, well baked, award winning loaf of raisin bread led to the evolution of life and us so we can contemplate the recipe and temperature and duration of the baking time, but it is not the only way a loaf can be mixed and baked and there might be parallel universes where these non-perfect conditions exist. Maybe this multi-versal meta-matrix is the basis of the "Dark Matter" monopolar magnetic-like repulsive field that our Positive Matter/Dark Matter recipe is encased within ?
@paulwalsh23445 жыл бұрын
So, if Dark Matter is a repulsive force-effect kind of matter, then is it separate from Dark Energy really ? Is it like Dark Matter is the Neodymium Magnet and the Dark Energy is the strong magnetic field it has ? It's been something I've been a proponent of for about 20 years now that in order to determine the extreme aspects of gravity and now in this case repulsive effects (possibly) of Dark Matter, then a very precise observation and analysis of the redshifts and direction of such redshifts at the boundaries of voids and matter filaments of the cosmic web evident throughout the large-scale universe could be done. Originally I wondered if that investigation would help determine if Dark Energy was to Gravity, what Redshift was to Light. i.e. if light was so far away that it's redshift was so downshifted that a fantastically distant galaxy's photons could not ever reach us due to the hard limit on the speed of light. I wondered if Gravity was indeed mediated by a particle, the graviton, that, like the photon could not exceed the speed of light and therefore a fantastically distant galaxy's gravitons could not reach us so in effect eventually loose it's attractive property with our nearby galactic masses' gravitons and that was what was responsible for the seemingly increase in the universe's expansion rate... when all matter was close enough in the first few billions of years since the Big Bang all the matter's gravitons interacted normally, but when the expansion's redshift exceeded the "speed of gravity" then that attractive property immediately diminished with the square of distance and the apparent force of Dark Energy began to dominate. I wondered if examining behavior of matter's redshift at the very distant peripheries of inter-galactic superclusters and voids could help determine if gravity did behave the exact same way over there as it did here locally ? And again it is extremely fine observation needed just like what was discerned from the COBE and WMAP probe's data.
@sergiontothetop5 жыл бұрын
Like flex tape
@ComatoseMN5 жыл бұрын
Imagine calking your bath tub with a black hole... I prefer mine lukewarm. I have an event horizon sensitivity... >M
@frankrwalsh5 жыл бұрын
It gives us what we have not had before: a method of directly testing the theory. That is totally sane.
@Ritz_26.5 жыл бұрын
Listening to this theory feels like finding out cheat codes to a game
@Valhalla.Studio5 жыл бұрын
wait wait wait, negative mass? does that mean anti-gravity and warp-drive might be possible? OMG 🤓🤓🤓
@chocobillysranch92055 жыл бұрын
Element 115
@lyrimetacurl05 жыл бұрын
Probably not warp drive or anything stupid like "if you drop a negative mass then it tries to piledrive into the Earth even faster when it collides" as some people seem to think.
@brianofphobos88625 жыл бұрын
Yes
@brianofphobos88625 жыл бұрын
@Y O J I M B O 用心棒 ?
@Ezael1155 жыл бұрын
Choco Account lol mhm yep
@NanaelSoloer5 жыл бұрын
If negative matter exists, it would be pushed away by matter and hitting the negative matter present in this "web" ( negative matter in space ), which would push it back towards matter, keeping it in place. The resulting force tho would point away from the most dense areas of the universe, making it expand.
@paulwalsh23445 жыл бұрын
I talked about this a bit in a previous comment, that if Dark Matter is a fluid in which ordinary or "Positive Matter" "floats" like oil on water, is it possible that "Space" is the fluid in this case, but not made up of a matter like all fluids we know of is, but a field into which Positive Matter interacts repulsively. What other things have a field that interacts with matter ? Magnetism. North and south poles repel their counterpart. What if there is a monopolar field of space that the positive matter is repelled by. The field is static in relation to itself but is blown about and knotted by conglomerations of matter that does very strongly interact and attract itself. It's like Positive Matter pushes and thins the field and by that way constrains it to invisible voids and filaments where the ordinary Positive Matter flows around and pools ? Thin conglomerations of matter like giant gas clouds more easily flow around the field. Large conglomerations of matter like galaxies, supermassive Black Holes at the centres of these galaxies and galactic superclusters attract exponentially more and their repulsive interaction with the field constrains the monopolar magnet-like field it surrounds or is encased in. Also If Dark Matter is a repulsive force-effect kind of matter, then is it separate from Dark Energy really ? Is it like Dark Matter is the Neodymium Magnet and the Dark Energy is the strong magnetic field it has ?
@CANEHURRICANE5 жыл бұрын
Love your channel dude keep up the good work
@micheal495 жыл бұрын
Hello, Wonderful Anton! Thank you for all of your videos.
@christianwoodland62975 жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff! 😁👍 We'll see either they prove it or not. I'm sure if this does answer what it is, there will be a whole new set of questions afterwards. 🤔💭
@elizabethwinsor-strumpetqueen5 жыл бұрын
The budget deficit and dark matter ...ARE THE SAME THING !!!!!!
@DawzeyJ5 жыл бұрын
What you need to understand is not finding something, is finding something. It can help to rule out possibilities and disprove theories. When you observe, seeing “nothing” is a result.
@johnhull25825 жыл бұрын
Hypothesis: The nature of the universe is more similar to boiling sugar. A point of nucleation in a ocean of matter was the "big bang". The expanding state change of space/time pushes back the "nothing" that is the ocean creating the universe. It expands faster as the forces of state change exceed the surrounding "nothing" (deep sea of matter). There is a very good chance that space time not only extends out but also collapses in creating space in multiple dimensions. This would suggest that the nature of the universe is like boiling sugar with bubbles expanding, collapsing and dark matter the sugar bubbles and strands being pushed back and yet sometimes pulling. Black holes would be areas where the matter has re-condensed possibly even creating new universes inside themselves. A roiling bubbling foam of dimensions.
@daniellanctot65485 жыл бұрын
8:00 - Is it just me or does that look like it could be the building blocks for anti-gravity technology...?
@Khannea5 жыл бұрын
If we can industrially increase the emergence rate of this substance, and make it emerge forcefully inside event horizons, then we may be literally be capable of blowing up black holes.
@FloatingOer5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a great idea! What could possibly go wrong?
@Bertydude5 жыл бұрын
Why would you do that xD
@kirkhamandy5 жыл бұрын
@@Bertydude _Why would you do that xD_ People like to watch a good fireworks display don't they?
@Khannea5 жыл бұрын
@@Bertydude - you so need to.go watch all of Isaac Arthur's videos
@Bertydude5 жыл бұрын
@@Khannea I watched a couple of his vids. Why would an advanced civilization blow up a black hole ? For energy purposes or just fun ? I'm genuinely curious to elaborate on our beloved Anton Petrov's comment section.
@ikannunaplays5 жыл бұрын
So if dark matter that has negative gravity and gravity and time are related doesn't that mean going backwards in time is possible with dark matter in this simulation?
@spacesergeant1012 жыл бұрын
So my mind gets blown from time to time by Petrov videos, but seeing Petrov with his mind blown is pretty amazing.
@vyratron8394 жыл бұрын
Maybe space is just repulsive to mass, and masses just shield each other from space-repulsion in a way that looks like gravitational attraction.
@Yarblocosifilitico4 жыл бұрын
maybe is an ocean-like medium with currents of matter and dark matter (or positive and negative charged fields if you wanna look at it from a different perspective)
@FUBBA5 жыл бұрын
Well, we’ll see. I want a gravity gun like Freeman.
@deusexaethera4 жыл бұрын
You say that dark matter would fall into gravity wells and stay there if it interacted normally with gravity, but that's not true. Because dark matter doesn't interact electromagnetically, it doesn't have any way to convert kinetic energy into heat (i.e. thermal photons, which are a manifestation of the electromagnetic force) to dissipate its kinetic energy. The only way dark matter particles could dissipate their kinetic energy would be through direct collisions with other particles that _do_ interact electromagnetically, and thus could receive energy from those collisions and then radiate it away as thermal photons. Most types of particles in the universe are "pointlike", meaning they have no physical cross-section, thus direct collisions are impossible and they can only interact with each other via the fundamental forces. Because dark matter doesn't interact with any other fundamental forces besides gravity, dark matter has no way to lose kinetic energy, and is doomed to swirl around gravity wells forever.
@chrishamilton81345 жыл бұрын
It actually makes a lot of sense. . . Sometimes the hardest answers have the easiest solutions
@imaginaryuniverse6325 жыл бұрын
It seems that there are many systems in the Universe that behave as matter floating in water, as the planets pulled by the Sun or protons pulled into a cell; or as just moving water as in the case of the Sun and the atmospheres of the planets... Maybe dark matter is Planck length Toroids in perfect symmetry, maybe what some call the vector equilibrium, where the Toroids in equilibrium don't produce or absorb vibrations of asymetrical Toroids but allows them to flow through like sound through water while allowing for things to be spaced apart yet connected vibrational. Maybe we are oceans floating in a single ocean, draining into that ocean as we are filled by that ocean.
@Inertia8885 жыл бұрын
wow, where did you come up with that? it's beautiful
@imaginaryuniverse6325 жыл бұрын
It started when I noticed that my thoughts attract other thoughts of the same nature, negative or positive. When I noticed this I could see in my mind a black hole in space pulling out of that space a particular kind of energy that my thoughts had created an attraction for. Even though I think that I also believed at the time that black holes were the source of all Evil. I have come to find that the Universe tells many stories of the same theme so we can see that they are true because their similiarities are too complex to be coincidental. Like the electron transfer chain in our cells strips electrons and create a pressure gradient between the inner membrane and the outer which creates a current to power equipment, a pressure gradient of charge is Created between the ground and the clouds and produces a current as lightning and sprites and whatnot, the Sun heats the equator most greatly creating a current of rising air that falls at the poles, same as is found in the oceans above and below the Earth's Crust. Galaxies form as nodules in the currents of outer space just as neurons form in the currents of our minds. All currents create waves that push and distort their boundary into the next. These patterns are seen everywhere in all kinds of systems of organization and interaction, lines of ants and anthills, interstate highways and cities. We see the same thing everywhere because everything is one thing. Einstein said everything is relative and everything is energy but also said that he didn't believe in a personal God and also thanked the Universe for everything so as to be friends with it. Einstein's equation equates to everything divided by Energy is one thing. I think that a lot of Belief is beyond our ability to consistently express in words. I just can't imagine that Einstein didn't believe in a personal God because he acted as though he did.
@Inertia8885 жыл бұрын
@@imaginaryuniverse632 I thought he said, "god doesn't roll dice" I suppose it's not important to my relationship with god, but seems to be he at least considered god a possibility. ...or was that Einstein? I could be wrong
@imaginaryuniverse6325 жыл бұрын
@@Inertia888 Yes Einstein told Heisenberg that God doesn't roll the dice. I just read someone commenting how Einstein said he didn't believe in a personal God but he acted as though he did. I think most of the greatest physicists believe in a Creator of the Universe.
@xc1971pp4 жыл бұрын
Hi, Mr. Petrov. What if "Dark Energy" and "Dark Matter" are just the same thing and that is an intrinsic expansion of space-time?
@omsingharjit3 жыл бұрын
That's what mine theory says
@mr.h50285 жыл бұрын
Enjoying your content, I don't know who the 400+ people are that dislike your videos but, haters gotta hate!
@d.l.d.l.81404 жыл бұрын
Anton, thank you for keeping your explanations available to those of us without a formal education. You have made the general concept of space accessible to me. I can’t thank you enough for the work you do. Godspeed.
@the113825 жыл бұрын
I am just guessing, but doesn’t that mean negative energy? My understanding is that if m < 0, therefor E < 0. Although this is the strict formula of E = mc2, which means there may be other variables I don’t know of that make E = 0 or E > 0. What does negative energy even mean?
@ryancraigt5 жыл бұрын
Well I dont really think anybody can awnser the question what does negative energy even mean. As an equal question is what is energy. Something to remember is that our "energy" is only positive from our point of view. Theres nothing intrinsically positive about it other then what we named it and how we view it. Symmetry is a common thing in physics and makes a lot more intuitive sense then having an "up or down"
@milanstevic84245 жыл бұрын
well, what does positive energy mean? it's defined only in how it interacts with the rest of the physics, so why couldn't it be symmetrical as well?
@LeelooMinai5 жыл бұрын
For some reason I find it amusing that basic physic concepts do not have "meaning" behind them, outside of the meaning assigned to them by humans through observations, calculations, predictions, experiments, etc. To me it's both kind of obvious and mind-boggling at the same. I looked up how energy is defined on Wikipedia, but, seems that it's defined using the concept of work, and potential to do it, so, I guess my physics knowledge is too primitive to gain more interesting ideas about energy this way. I am a programmer and I know a bit about the concept of entropy, so maybe this way and binary system of energy-1 and energy-0 as some kind two-way contributors to increasing and decreasing entropy where entropy signifies how the "simulation" progressed from the start from state of "everything" to "nothing" in some never-ending cyclical sense? Again, it's all just musings, but to me if something has energy, like matter with its mass, I visualize it as it having potential to go through a lot of "states" before the energy is gone (ie. achieves full entropy and nothing more can happen to it.) From there, I wonder what the opposite of that should do in terms of entropy... Seems it (ie negative energy) should contribute to decreasing the number of states required to achieve the full entropy (?) What would that mean in practice? Well, obviously, I have no idea... Maybe it means that matter does not expand systematically and dissipates the energy in a uniform (and boring) process, but sometimes "finishes" faster in a black hole and other spectacular events? So negative energy could be some form of input/parameter into the simulation (of the universe,) to make it different from other attempts maybe? OK, I am finished: what I wrote is probably indistinguishable from being on some kind of a mushroom trip (not that I had any in the past.)
@ryancraigt5 жыл бұрын
@@LeelooMinai like your take. I'm pretty in tune with physics but deffenitly not the nitty gritty of stuff like dark matter. Though as far as I know dark matter has a positive effect on entropy not a negative. Entropys positive or negative movement(on a universal scale) is only dependant on the direction of time.
@LeelooMinai5 жыл бұрын
@@ryancraigtWhen I think about it today, if this was about a simulation, whether dark matter increases or decreases the rate (not sure how to call it - for me time would be just state changes) of entropy would not be the key point; the key point would be that it changes/limits the steps/states on the way to the conclusion (the infinite entropy,) that is, it introduces some variance from, I imagine, an ultra-boring case of a "bing bang" and then uniform expansion, with no galaxies formed, no interesting particles, no life, etc. I guess, in the even more general sense, I am wondering if this is not the whole idea behind the dark matter: to prevent a process that would otherwise have no "interesting" stages from happening. Unfortunately, I also realize that this is futile: if indeed universe is a simulation and this is the case, it's likely impossible to do anything useful with that assumption; not without knowing what the simulation is used for/looking for.
@brenttaylordotus5 жыл бұрын
Algebra 101 - always check your signs : D
@Lord_Nemesis84 жыл бұрын
I actually love this hypothesis....it's elegant and simple and probably correct
@DragonflyArtz15 жыл бұрын
Interesting. When Ben Rich of Lockheed Skunk-works was asked by an Engineer how does the propulsion system work? (referring to the craft that can take "ET" home) he asked "How does ESP work?" The Engineer answers in a guessing tone "All points in space and time are connected?" Ben answers "That's how it works." in the calamity of reporters shouting Ben tuns and adds "There was a mistake in the math."
@RickEthiertruthsearch545 жыл бұрын
Hi Mr. Petrov, My Theory of Everything I have been waiting for nearly fifty years for someone to come to the realization of how the universe works. I first tried to explain it to my grade seven teacher to no avail. He simply could not grasp the concept. It was not his fault. He as many or possibly all suffer from the misnomer that the product of the “big bang” event is the universe. In fact, this explosive event happened within the universe. I have always been mystified as to why our most brilliant minds would say that the universe could be infinite while claiming that it is about thirteen and a half billion years old. I do not fault these great minds when it comes to understanding infinite. The question is if you can put a measurement on the duration it has existed, why refer to it as infinite? The universe may be infinite but not the “big bang” event. I could sum it up by quoting, “for whatever there is a beginning to there is also an end!” First, let us examine what current science claims. A couple of seconds prior to the “big bang” is unknowable to us since there was no time or space. Our science breaks down. Simply no physics and yet in the same breath it is asserted that there was a singularity! We must ask a simple question. Through what processes does a singularity form? Well from our current thinking and understanding, it is gravity. Thanks to Mr. Newton’s observations and math calculations, gravity is proportional to mass. Therefore, to have gravity there must have been mass, prior to the “big bang!” We can measure mass and the effects of gravity since ours like most other galaxies has a massive black hole and singularity at its center. It would appear that our physics does not break down prior to the previously mentioned “big bang” event. Our science would seem to be constantly contradicting itself or perhaps it is just a case of “the forest cannot be seen for the trees!” Humankind believes that if he were not there to hear the tree fall it is questionable as to whether it made a sound. I put this philosophical question in the same category as, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin and file it under irrelevant and foolish! Of course, it made a sound, just like space and time already existed before the “big bang” even though human beings were not around to measure them. It is a good thing that human beings exist or the explosive event known as the “big bang” indeed the universe’s existence would seem to be questionable. Dark matter is the building blocks of visible matter. After an immeasurable time, the measurable aspects of matter and interaction breaks down due to the vast distances between even the smallest particles. It is the remnants and ashes of the explosion, fine soot. All that is matter and of course energy is subject to entropy and dissolution as it spreads out in all directions from the source. We know that the explosion was not even in all directions, so the vast clouds of dark matter floated around the universe until eventually, they encountered other clouds of dark matter. After periods that are immeasurable, vast amounts of dark matter began to coalesce until eventually the process, due to gravity, began to gain momentum. The amount of time is anybody’s guess since humankind was not there to measure it; possibly, it took countless trillions of years to become the initial beginnings of a singularity. This bourgeoning singularity continued gravitationally attracting more and more dark matter, including at some point dark energy to it. The speed at which the singularity was absorbing dark matter and dark energy became too much for the singularity to adjust to, a tipping point, the result was a “big bang!” like a baby that takes too much milk too quickly and needs to burp. The resulting matter that is created could not be stabilized until a thin dimensional wall was formed from the initial massive release of energy and separated what was left of the newly created matter and antimatter, arresting the annihilation effect. The missing antimatter that our science cannot seem to find is attached to that thin dimensional wall. Normal matter is on this side directly adjacent. This is what made the visible matter we know possible, as this action sufficiently stabilized its creation. The stabilization is the process of energy shared back and forth between the thin dimensional wall, matter, and antimatter, a process similar to Tesla’s alternating current. All of the visible matter that is detectable has the stabilizing antimatter directly juxtaposition across from it and vice a versa. I have taken notice that when I point my finger at the antimatter universe and say, “you are the antimatter universe,” that there seems to be a person pointing back at me making the same statement! As for the missing gravity or at least fifty percent of the total amount of it, is being shared with this mirrored reflection, and maybe at least partly responsible for balancing and stabilizing our visible matter. All of this has happened at least twice and may happen repeatedly, forever like a seemingly never-ending pulse. My dear friend, if the content of this paper seems simple and brief then I have accomplished at least part of my objective. As Mr. Einstein stated,” If you cannot explain it in simple terms, then you do not understand it yourself. By Rick Ethier
@caedes57285 жыл бұрын
Rick Ethier do you have any maths to back up your assertion?
@RickEthiertruthsearch545 жыл бұрын
@@caedes5728 Sorry, I do not. I'm sure that it would be interesting though!
@caedes57285 жыл бұрын
Rick Ethier, in that case I will stick to the people who have done the maths and experiments to back up what they say.
@nozoto5 жыл бұрын
So possibly, this negative mass matter would infinitely draw from the void, giving body to the zero-point energy theory? The implications of this are formidable!
@i-evi-l5 жыл бұрын
Casimir Effect.
@The_Keeper5 жыл бұрын
@@i-evi-l So, the casimir effect would keep it from violating the second law of thermodynamics then? I was wondering how the theory would get around that minor detail...
@i-evi-l5 жыл бұрын
I'd say that gets explained more by the Big Crunch or the Deep Freeze, especially since it's all uncharted territory. Stable, unoxidized matter basically circumvents the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Shrug. Same for Tantalum 180m isomer, and Bismuth. Quasi-stable elements.
@ShifuCareaga5 жыл бұрын
or nothing-burger.
@AustinJFerret5 жыл бұрын
I'm wondering if Anton misinterpreted something, because spontaneously generating negative-mass particles would be a huge departure from currently-accepted conservation of mass and energy, which is a MUCH bigger deal than "what if negative mass is actually a thing?"
@holdmybeers5 жыл бұрын
The bubble thumbnail is a great example. The bubbles (representing matter) and the spaces surrounding (represents space) I can try to understand the elasticity between matter and dark matter theory, but it’s more likely matter by nature drives to be as dense as possible. There is no such thing as negative matter.
@leeorshimhoni89495 жыл бұрын
brilliant. finding a concept that after running it in a gravitational simulator, result in patterns matching reality. must be right. cheers to you.
@christopherlin47065 жыл бұрын
When the answer is stupid simple and people always miss it.
@positronundervolt47995 жыл бұрын
No. When scientists are told to ignore things because the holy lord Einstein said it was impossible, it's not about being simple, it's about challenging dogma.
@christopherlin47065 жыл бұрын
positron underVolt Einstein considered that it could be a thing but he didn’t know dark matter existed at the time
@baruchben-david41965 жыл бұрын
@@positronundervolt4799 He never said it was impossible. The consensus at the time was that the Universe was static, so Einstein added a constant to keep it static. He never said anything about it being impossible.
@logos77895 жыл бұрын
@@positronundervolt4799 electric universe makes waaaay more sense
@milanstevic84245 жыл бұрын
@@positronundervolt4799 exactly it's about the force of dogma, that inhibits free thought and sponsors obedient parrots.
@clairpahlavi4 жыл бұрын
DarkEnergy is a mathmyth.
@jamesfarrell83395 жыл бұрын
Hello wonderful person. Greetings from Atlantic City New Jersey USA.
@rainbowhiker3 жыл бұрын
As I've see written before, I've always considered dark matter as very refined matter that precedes positive matter as we know it so this theory is a step in the right direction.
@Kitsaplorax5 жыл бұрын
Dear Anton; This is similar to Hoyle's notion that empty space created matter. Interesting!
@barefootalien5 жыл бұрын
You're a bit off in your interpretation of the standard theory for Dark Matter. It doesn't clump at all, actually. And it most definitely is attracted gravitationally to normal matter (in the standard interpretation). The reason it doesn't clump into planets, stars, and galaxies is because it doesn't interact with anything in any way other than gravity. Thus it does go into the center of galaxies, planets, and stars... it just oscillates right back out of them with no loss of momentum, since it can't undergo any sort of friction. The dark matter halos around galaxies aren't stagnant things; they're constantly churning, zipping in and out of the galaxies in an almost boiling-like motion. The reason they form large halos is because the average motion of the countless particles create that form on average. I admit it's not a very compelling theory, and I do quite like this negative mass interpretation, but as a science communicator, it's good to get the status quo correct. ;)
@ibjacked5 жыл бұрын
Whoa. Thank you, that's the first description that's actually "clicked" for me, and I can visualize the motions and interactions, that's awesome! :) Now let's hope that's actually correct, since it'd be kind of embarrassing if the only thing that has made sense to me is wrong.
@Jadinandrews5 жыл бұрын
I think dark matter can undergo 'friction' as a result of tiny gravity waves it emits? It's probably negligible but it should be there.
@TheIgnoramus5 жыл бұрын
I think this this model is going to show the possibility of more relevant forces than gravity with regards to matter/dark matter attraction in expansion theory. Meaning the variable of gravitational attraction you mentioned might not be as much of driving force we think it is in the shape and growth of the universe, or the fact that matter and anti-matter attract. if that makes sense
@DLJ_Official5 жыл бұрын
Haha riiiight, because you understand it better than anyone else. LOL!
@bl88965 жыл бұрын
Papers on Bullet Galaxy interactions should be able to prove/disprove this theory...at least if this theory would hold up to the observations made there
@ericnickell38004 жыл бұрын
Allow me to offer a simple idea to explain why negative mass doesn’t repulse itself and attracts itself instead but not so much regular matter. Gravity is explained as bending the fabric of space time. We often simulate this by showing a large object on a cloth and how it makes the cloth stretch and dip down. Well, if negative mass exists then it should have negative gravity. It would essentially be like putting an object on the opposite side of the cloth and stretching the cloth and dipping up. It would act the same as any other mass would in space just mirrored. When negative mass surrounds regular mass it would naturally repel the normal mass but at the same time would bind itself to the rest of the negative mass surrounding it.
@majiclamp48575 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. It’s those that go outside the box that find answers and win Nobel prizes.
@bayleafiam24615 жыл бұрын
Looks like a granite countertop! 😂
@robertfletcher34215 жыл бұрын
Could this also lead to the conundrum of why we have matter and no antimatter?
@KidArkx5 жыл бұрын
Anti matter exists
@flerfbuster79935 жыл бұрын
@@KidArkx I think he meant why the majority of the universe is comprised of matter and not animatter
@W1se0ldg33zer5 жыл бұрын
Anti-matter has mass. It has the opposite charge from its matter counterpart.
@W1se0ldg33zer5 жыл бұрын
NASA said anti-matter costs 62.5 Trillion dollars per gram to produce in 1999.
@indigodragon06135 жыл бұрын
Yeoss :3 We actually have warehouses full of anti matter held within vacuum containers.
@joedance144 жыл бұрын
MOND postulates that gravity is not constant, but varies over large distance. Scientists criticize it for lacking a theoretical basis, an explanation oh “how” and “why”. I read recently that more scientists are starting to believe that gravity is inconstant; you recently had a video about the Hubble Constant being inconstant. It strikes me that this approach appears to fit the facts better than conventional “dark matter” models, and provides the theoretical basis. I would appreciate your take on this idea.
@ColemanMulkerin5 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say it was a total waste for two reasons. 1. Proving something doesn't exist is advancing knowledge 2. Overcoming the engineering challenges for the detector will probably make it easier to overcome the next challenge.
@usernamesrlamo5 жыл бұрын
It’s really intriguing to think this solves so many problems possibly including what drove the runaway inflation of the very early universe.
@richb22295 жыл бұрын
Dark matter may not exist. It’s one solution to a problem in specific theory’s and associated math.
@patrickbrumm41205 жыл бұрын
dark matter is quantized intent. dark energy is the effect of worshiping dark matter. all very vile
@sandalthong40105 жыл бұрын
I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson, who said that we should call it Dark Gravity to explain the problem, as Dark Matter implies the solution. I've felt for a long time that it's a fairy dust theory.
@MrXuliest5 жыл бұрын
@@sandalthong4010 You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
@MrXuliest5 жыл бұрын
@@patrickbrumm4120 You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
@MrXuliest5 жыл бұрын
You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
@riderknight58053 жыл бұрын
If it constantly replenishes we should make beer out of dark matter.
@danielhughes68965 жыл бұрын
1. How can force be the opposite direction to acceleration, force causes acceleration so they must by definition be in the same direction. 2. Dark matter is required, because we noticed there isn't enough visible mass to hold the universe together, therefore to fill the dark matter gap it must by definition attract, we invented the idea of dark matter because we need something that attracts like normal mass but is invisible/undetectable in all other ways, therefore the one single defining feature of dark matter is that it has positive mass, its the only thing we know for sure about it.
@UpcycleElectronics5 жыл бұрын
Lol, love the satire.
@kjpmi5 жыл бұрын
"Dark matter" is a placeholder name for something that we don't yet understand. It's that simple, Anton. And it's not just a negative sign that's missing. I really don’t like how you misunderstand or misrepresent stuff. You STILL need to detect ACTUAL negative mass MATTER. It's not just an emergent property of the math once you add a negative sign! What type of particle is this? What other properties does it have (spin, chirality, does it mirror the leptons and bosons of the standard model or is it another fundamental particle)? And you FUNDAMENTALLY misunderstand how science works. We spend money on these things NOT to prove something. Science is experimenting in order to RULE THINGS OUT!!! That's the scientific process. You think of a hypothesis, develop a FALSIFIABLE, rigorous theory, then you experiment to try to disprove it or rule something out to a reasonable level of assurance. Go take a science class, Anton.
@ShifuCareaga5 жыл бұрын
Kris = badass spitting truth bombs.
@milanstevic84245 жыл бұрын
it's a type of particle that won't come anywhere near us to detect it, because of that negative sign. are you deaf? had anyone consider this for a moment, maybe we could've ruled such experiment out immediately and spent that money more gracefully? besides, your butt seems to be hurt . go see a doctor.
@kjpmi5 жыл бұрын
Milan Stevic IF such a particle exists it would pop into existence from the vacuum like virtual particles. Weren’t you listening? Such a particle wouldn’t just be created in deep space. It would be created everywhere and migrate away from regular matter. Even in deep space there is regular matter particles. There’s nothing special about space here where we are, there’s just a higher concentration of regular matter. If it were to selectively come into existence only in deep space then the theory is unfalsifiable and untestable. It also may be something that could be created in a particle accelerator. We just don’t know yet. It may be a matter of exciting the correct field at just the right energy. Who knows. But for it to be a viable theory it has to be testable.
@milanstevic84245 жыл бұрын
@@kjpmi I get you. But then there are maybe some huge constraints in our "positive" space due to having higher concentrations of regular matter, preventing the vacuum to act the way it does in "negative" space. For starters, I'd argue that being flooded by (positive) gravity defines the way vacuum behaves. Of course I'm only speculating, but if that's true, particle accelerators cannot do much but waste energy, and the theory is untestable. Unless you go to the gravity-unaffected border of Milky Way, which would likely be somewhere between 5 and 10 kiloparsecs away from the outer rim. Let's call that a true zero-point space, because we've observed a clear demarcation line between the baryonic matter and what is known as dark matter. The two don't go along very well, and I thought that part was rather obvious, so it doesn't make much sense to expect such particles in our space, let alone produce them. Btw, there is also a possibility these "dark" particles aren't special at all, but ordinary leptons immersed in an extraordinary medium that makes them behave in special ways. Also, it could be that our space is in fact extraordinary, considering the volumes involved. And it's funny that a theory would be unfalsifiable and untestable just because we can't get our instruments over there. Then why do we believe in the molten core of Earth and models of Sun's composition? Both theories are completely untestable and will be for a very long time. Not to mention black holes. So there's ought to be a general theory that is testable in fringes, and provable against the backdrop of what is easily observed.
@ShifuCareaga5 жыл бұрын
@@milanstevic8424 so... you're in favor of a hypothesis that from its get o is ascientific (pure fiction)? "There's ancient aliens! But they all died and burned all their evidence, and we can never know for sure anything about them!" Sounds more like a Zen koan to me. As I wrote to Anton, "So your idea of good science is a) a simulation of b) NEGATIVE MASS which c) has never been found or observed to d) explain a pseudoscientific hypothesis for something that has definitely never been found instead of e) going with PLASMA PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY which explains all of the rotation issues without invoking bullshit and has actually been found. Congrats you're a dupe. Bose-Einstein Condensate isn't DM Negative mass doesn't exist This guy is making things up and you're supporting that anti-scientific behavior. PS - actually they already switched to a DM that works: "charged" Dark Matter, which I promise you is nothing more than baryons and bosons. As for DE, redshift is wrong... we know this from Gaia DR2, actually."
@liammurphy27254 жыл бұрын
Another fascinating tidbit from the The Great Out There. Sir, I salute you.
@philipfong4800 Жыл бұрын
Liquid Universe is not new, there was a website dedicated to it but removed.
@bestonyoutube5 жыл бұрын
Wouldnt this mean countless more consequences? Is there also negative mass antimatter? Are there negative mass black holes (would that be a white hole?), did negative mass trigger/drive the big bag? Why doesnt the negative mass interact with normal mass or is invisible? If the universe expands, so that makes the positive energy of the universe larger, therefore negative mass pops out of existence all the time? Doesnt that mean, the universe isnt accelerating in its expansion (could be an illusion, of negative mass affected expansion differently back in time / was more concentrated).
@meskalin645 жыл бұрын
The singularity of the super massive black hole in the center of the galaxy creates a bubble between universes. That bubble pushes the nearby universes and creates a negetive mass effect there. Thats what we call dark energy. We cant see it because it not in our universe but we can feel it. Can i get a thumbs up?
@rocketrace4904 жыл бұрын
The theory you created about dark matter, and how it basically keeps the universe together, sounds like gravity and how it keeps solar systems put together. I think that gravity works with this dark matter in some way. I hope scientists figure out what dark matter is, and also its relation to gravity.
@quite1enough5 жыл бұрын
There's theory which explains galaxy rotation curve without dark matter, it calls "Metric dynamics" by Russian scientist Sergei Siparov (or "Anisotropic geometrodynamics", which is expansion of special and general relativity theories), which states (from the second name) that our space is in fact anisotropic. It seem to also explain such unique things as Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall.
@spenner35295 жыл бұрын
A theory to explain a theory.
@Alienami5 жыл бұрын
Hypothesis*
@spenner35295 жыл бұрын
Alien Ami: Guesses.
@catpoke95575 жыл бұрын
@@spenner3529 "Hmm, I think we can make a hot, warm, glowing thing by rubbing these two sticks together.. but it's just a theory that it can even be made to begin with, so of course I shouldn't theorize on how to make it." ~The caveman who could've doomed humanity. In order to make a theory, you have to make sense of things. In order to make sense of things, you have to theorize. A 'theory' by the usual usage of the term is just something we haven't figured out for sure yet, and saying "It's just a theory" won't help you figure it out.
@spenner35295 жыл бұрын
Cat Poke: I’m guessing-sorry, theorizing-you have too much time on your hands.
@catpoke95575 жыл бұрын
@@spenner3529 I never said I make theories. I'm saying you shouldn't criticize those who do just because they can't come up with a conclusion out if thin air, without any thought as to how it could work beforehand.
@cleanerben96365 жыл бұрын
yes but now we have to look for negative matter which isn't any better than looking for dark matter. Also how can you have less than 0 mass?
@luciddaze2485 жыл бұрын
CleanerBen if we work out how something can have less than 0 mass, wow, that would completely rewrite science! We can finally have our antigravity hover cars!
@i-evi-l5 жыл бұрын
Photons are massless.
@SHA256HASH5 жыл бұрын
It’s almost like how mathematicians were when it came to taking the square root of negative numbers. They invented a way (by defining i = sqrt(-1)) and look at us today. I think a similar thing will happen with negative mass.
@The_Keeper5 жыл бұрын
So dark matter is basically like Element Zero from the Mass Effect series..?
@i-evi-l5 жыл бұрын
Sure. Why not? Lol
@Dampfaeus4 жыл бұрын
I don't know if any of these hypothesis will hold, but negative mass matter would be the best outcome for everyone. It is the "impossible" negative mass of matter that is required in faster than light travel.
@valsarff65255 жыл бұрын
"Negative" mass? Well anyway, mathematical simulations are fun but Plasma Cosmology has solved the dark matter problem with something real and not imagined.
@paladin17t5 жыл бұрын
Dark matter doesn't exist. It's just an ad hoc hypothesis.
@nadtz5 жыл бұрын
That's correct on one level, dark matter is a placeholder name for something we don't understand yet just like anti matter and matter are group names used for things we understand to some extent. The names don't really matter but the things they represent well...
@joelombrdo5 жыл бұрын
Paladin, I've often wondered if that's the case. If there's 5 times as much of it as regular matter then there should be quite a bit of it around us, here in our own solar system (at least that's what the odds are). I just feel we're not understanding gravity as well as we should.
@paladin17t5 жыл бұрын
@@joelombrdo to be fair, it shouldn't be very abundant in the the Solar System. I've seen estimates that claim that the amount of dark matter inside Neptune's orbit should be only about the mass of the Moon, which would probably be impossible to observe. But I would agree with your last point.
@liquidminds5 жыл бұрын
Dark matter might be a theory, but the effects it tries to describe are happening in the real world. If you manage to disprove dark matter, I'm pretty sure there's a nobel price in it for you.
@paladin17t5 жыл бұрын
@@liquidminds I would agree. Though I think one should prove it exists rather than prove it doesn't. Non-existence of something should be assumed by default, whereas existence requires evidence. That's a more logically coherent way of looking at things.
@lezking50605 жыл бұрын
Is "negative matter" just "stuff that doesn't have a good word to say about anything"??
@Ivan_BSGO5 жыл бұрын
You mean like cosmic feminism? XD I know, not the channel for it but still.
@MushVPeets5 жыл бұрын
It's basically... material with negative mass, or if you like, a negative energy (E=mc^2, after all). It's just the best way we have of saying it.
@briannielsen20025 жыл бұрын
Does it even matter?
@briannielsen20025 жыл бұрын
@@MushVPeets That equation will always be positive for any input.
@MushVPeets5 жыл бұрын
@@briannielsen2002 If m is negative, E is negative, and vice versa.
@yelectric18935 жыл бұрын
I am very excited. Maybe a particle may be manipulated to create an alcuibire drive. Sorry if I misspelt the name
@TelsaBom5 жыл бұрын
The implications of Farnes' theory could have a revolutionary impact on physics. "Nevertheless, a theory of negative mass is complicated to assess in relation to other known cosmological results - which have overwhelmingly been developed with the implicit assumption that mass is only positive. For these reasons, nearly all theories, experiments, observations, and physical interpretations need to be rigorously revisited."