Keep in mind, you can't see stars during the day, but they're still there.
@Uvoted4this Жыл бұрын
How do you know if you can't see them
@Jordy-927 Жыл бұрын
Obviously fake. Definitely not how stars work. 😂😂 Edit: in case the emojis didn't give it away, this is a facetious comment. I can't believe smart people read this and think otherwise.
@firstnamelastname396 Жыл бұрын
Wrong look at his eyes, STARE at them notice how he talks find the middle
@lawrencedoliveiro9104 Жыл бұрын
The moon-landing deniers seem willing to concede that we have got as far as low-Earth orbit. But those photos from those flights, showing the brightness of the Earth and the darkness of space in the same picture, don’t show any stars either, for the same reason.
@mylesm5701 Жыл бұрын
@@firstnamelastname396maybe try English next time
@chewygaming16 ай бұрын
"If i don't understand it, then it's fake."
@user-up1id5rv2m6 ай бұрын
Of course!
@RecordedMercury6 ай бұрын
You just have low esoteric knowledge
@joycedavis99966 ай бұрын
do you understand the air you breathe?
@whereismycup6 ай бұрын
@@joycedavis9996air is fake, we breathe water, but I don’t really understand it. This is what THEY are trying to hide!
@eliminator14726 ай бұрын
“I’m also smarter than everyone else”
@stevecastro13252 ай бұрын
USSR and Communist China would have been more than happy to show that we did not land on the Moon. That is called 3rd party verification.
@eilidh771Ай бұрын
Ahh Steve is wise in the ways of the world.
@jpmc271Ай бұрын
Ahhh ellie didn't graduate from high school. @@eilidh771
@AdhvaithSaneАй бұрын
Unless they already knew that it was faked and *wanted (?)* to expose it, but almost immediately realised that it would actually *serve their interests* in ways never previously thought of, so they went along with the whole lie? *_Countries conspiring against all of Mankind._* *But it’s ok.* The truth *will* come out and falsehood *will* vanish, as it is ever bound to vanish.
@ZunnerchiaАй бұрын
Yep, exactly. Instead they congratulated the US (the USSR however considered themselves the real winners of the space race for landing a probe on Venus in 1972).
@ajarivas72Ай бұрын
@@eilidh771 USSR and China were USA allies.
@ZunnerchiaАй бұрын
The irony is, if NASA faked the moon landing footage, it would have looked more "realistic" than the actual footage they took of the moon. My favorite joke is that they did indeed fake the moon landing but they got Stanley Kubrick to direct it and he's such a perfectionist that he decided to film on location.
@lifes-A-divot29 күн бұрын
Look at space odyssey made before the Mook landing so don't give me that they faked it they just need to cover it up
@lifes-A-divot29 күн бұрын
We have more technology in our phones then that was on that mission and we can't do it again come on u gotta be smarter than this dnt be a sheep
@nickbeckwith621128 күн бұрын
Love that joke!
@tubecated_development28 күн бұрын
@@lifes-A-divot Look at 2001 a Space Odyssey it breaks laws of physics and shows us what someone’s imagination looks like, but not space.
@jacksonfurlong375726 күн бұрын
Careful with that joke, it's an antique!
@mrandersson20097 ай бұрын
They should hire paparazzi as astronauts. They are really good at taking pictures of stars.
@hitzoneproductions78586 ай бұрын
😂
@justinezafra6 ай бұрын
Excellent Dad joke. 👌
@dandi18876 ай бұрын
Underrated joke
@never_give_up906 ай бұрын
Lol that's not bad.
@sammiedee78386 ай бұрын
That's a good one 👍🏽
@SlappleBattles3 ай бұрын
“You can’t see stars during the day.” The Sun: Am I a joke to you?
@martinbgiles70652 ай бұрын
We are all a joke for them ..
@SlappleBattles2 ай бұрын
@@martinbgiles7065 real
@lastresort26002 ай бұрын
"that's a sun idiot"
@darnellboyd43912 ай бұрын
Yes you are
@wordwizard39122 ай бұрын
The sun is a star but stars are not suns
@chargingrhino563618 күн бұрын
What amazes me is that there are people that still think it was faked more than 50 years later.
@acikusej7 күн бұрын
They will think the same in the next 100 years...
@noellesherman48246 күн бұрын
What amazes me is that anyone thinks it happened. People would believe the Easter Bunny is real if their government told them so.
@buddywhatshisname5222 күн бұрын
There are people who genuinely believe that the earth is flat… it’s not that much of a stretch for people with a grade school understanding of science to think they understand all they need to in order debunk those who’ve studied for their entire career. The dunning Kruger effect is strong on the interwebs.
@geraldkirby22852 күн бұрын
@buddywhatshisname522 how would any organic being survive going through the van Allen radiation belt?
@thesedaze2381Күн бұрын
@@noellesherman4824 What convinces you that is did not happen?
@dustinmartinson123415 күн бұрын
Neil CRACKED himself up with that one. 😂
@anthonylove527512 күн бұрын
Ya old Neil is cringe....
@LokiDWolf7 ай бұрын
As a photographer, this is VERY accurate.
@yamato1267 ай бұрын
The stars are there they are just poorly rendered in 1950s 2d
@iamapokerface89927 ай бұрын
ok
@iamapokerface89927 ай бұрын
nobody cares that you are a "photographer" not a job anyway
@unknownph5377 ай бұрын
@@iamapokerface8992No one ask you kiddo better touch some grass
@sharkgrenadevr7 ай бұрын
@@iamapokerface8992 Do you think the moon landing was faked or something
@ironiccookies23207 ай бұрын
Tell those people to take a picture of some twinkling stars while in the city. Their cameras wouldn't even capture it.
@elidyson2567 ай бұрын
So you admit it should've
@jbhk79777 ай бұрын
They feed you the easiest narrative and everyone becomes a "specialist".
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@elidyson256?
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@jbhk7977This is basic photography, not a ‘narrative’?
@jbhk79777 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development The problem is not "photography basics". The problem is that people learned not to question the "experts". There are so many strange things surrounding the moonlanding. The "live phone call" for instance, meanwhile there are huge area's in the world (2024) where people still don't have cell service. Also the narrative that we lost the technology to go back to the moon or how they got the moon rover on the moon considering the fact that Apollo 15 was as big as apollo 11. But let's not get into that . . . The problem is that people fail to question things, only because a specialist tells you a reasonable story. Where I live we say "who checks the checker". In this case . . . no one. And if you dare to question him or question the narrative, you are a conspiracy theorist. This should scare you shitless. We entered an era where critisizm and hard questions are dismissed and rediculed. We live in an era where a virologist with 40 years of experience is "fact checked" by a 21 old woke idiot with blue hair and a nose ring banning his 30 min video with dire warning within 190 seconds. Thousands upon thousands of specialists were silenced the past 4 years by the woke liberal "experts" and look what we are facing because of that . . . excess m*rtality. Question everything my friend everything because that's the only way we evolve and stay sharp.
@ThatZyberGuy10 күн бұрын
Absolutely! Aperture and shutter speed play a big key part in this..
@Subcritical9611 күн бұрын
I saw Squatch the other day smoking a fat blunt! He called me over and convinced me the earth is flat. Elvis and Tupac were there also!
@benno2919805 ай бұрын
There's pretty much one thing that shuts down any conspiracy for me; the Soviets. They had supreme means and motive to call us out but never said a word. Congratulated us actually.
@Taj_Rahine5 ай бұрын
Russian a.i. identified the moon landing photos as fake about a month or so ago.
@Zarathustran5 ай бұрын
Sarcastically, to let Nixon know they weren't fooled.
@OM19_MO795 ай бұрын
Oh, and Russians congratulating Nixon, is not much different from the Japanese capitulating to MacArthur. It was that or see if someone would still stand in a nuclear war. Well, you should be excited, we may found out that this year. I am. I’m tired.
@MATTINCALI4 ай бұрын
all govs in the same club, should know that by now
@benno2919804 ай бұрын
@@MATTINCALIRight. "We spend trillions of dollars opposing each other, but let's secretly collaborate on this one thing for...reasons..."
@ChessAndRap Жыл бұрын
The camera man was the first person on the moon, THEN Neil and Buzz.
@claudiopadilha6551 Жыл бұрын
hahahaha
@Alexander-wl8qd Жыл бұрын
😢😂
@davidhillman7004 Жыл бұрын
Yes this picture that you refer too is what I was talking about
@davidcross5455 Жыл бұрын
And the last I think he's still up there
@dhamm7415 Жыл бұрын
The rover you mean 😂
@ErikaSilverhart10 күн бұрын
"No no, I did a 10 minute google research, so I'm pretty sure I know better than the professionals that studied and deal with this subject on a daily basis"
@adamdickinson28942 ай бұрын
I have gotta say that the thought of NASA going to all the expense of faking the moon landings then sitting round looking at the starless pictures thinking 'I'm sure there's something we've missed but I just can't put my finger on it' is pretty funny
@tubecated_developmentАй бұрын
According to the real smart people (the conspiracy-theorists) NASA and their film-directors got everything wrong. Not just this or that. Everything.
@davisfan10 ай бұрын
Photographer here. Stars are dim and require long exposures and high camera sensibility (high ISO). Sunlight, on earth, is so bright, that not a single star can be captured on the sensor using the same settings as a day scene. So, if the astronauts are lit by the sun, and the picture has to display them, then no stars will be seen on film or on a digital sensor.
@shauncejohn92009 ай бұрын
Ty❤
@nikolozka19 ай бұрын
Does that make the earth to shrink too?
@lazymass9 ай бұрын
@@nikolozka1what are you talking about? People like you really do have some problem to comprehend space distances, don't ya?
@user-ch7ks9ph5l9 ай бұрын
@@lazymassrelax man
@BasilMalik9 ай бұрын
tog here, confirmed.
@kizzik8 ай бұрын
They are the same ones who don't go on cruise ships for fear of falling off the edge. 😂
@skyshatter36338 ай бұрын
no, no they claim the edge is guarded by military who will prevent them from reaching it. Aka why they cant go there to prove their bs
@danno58058 ай бұрын
Those railings should be higher 😮
@Xinnie_The_Flu8 ай бұрын
Are they Muslims?😂
@Venomm7378 ай бұрын
@CareBear-hi3cxThat's a coincidence
@user-lq1tb1eq7z7 ай бұрын
You KNOW... dontcha?!
@kuunamiАй бұрын
It's the same reason why you have to turn up the brightness on your cellphone when it's very bright outside.
@jamescollins635817 күн бұрын
That's why it's difficult to photograph stars during a full moon
@angelsjoker81906 ай бұрын
The Soviet Union didn't deny the Americans were on the moon. This is enough of an indicator for me to think they were, in fact, on the moon.
@lloydearlofpudding95366 ай бұрын
Omg, i've been saying that for so long. You just know that soviets scientists had to go over the footage hundreds of Times in Hopes of finding a fake. The soviets would've loved to expose NASA as frauds, but they did not...
@patrickjane20246 ай бұрын
americans probably pay them off. the real question is why russia never sent there people to the moon then if it was that easy?
@koryburdet13176 ай бұрын
Yeah they were walking and driving on the moon. And made a direct call to the president while up there 😂😂😂😂
@mleise82926 ай бұрын
That was my mother's #1 argument when it came to moon landing denial - and her brother was into that conspiracy for a while.
@mleise82926 ай бұрын
@@koryburdet1317 Nixon called _them_, routed through mission control. (A direct call would have 3 seconds delay, but Nixon has to wait 7 seconds until he hears back from the astronaut.)
@pandabeear2 ай бұрын
It’s funny to me that the only people that think America faked the moon landing are Americans 🤣
@tubecated_development2 ай бұрын
You do get some ornery nationalists in other countries who hate the thought of the US achieving anything, so they’ll jump on the denial wagon without a thought. but yes, the US seems particularly enmired in self-hatred, pseudoscience and conspiracy theories right now. Of course none of it has to do with trolls and other things beginning with TR… /s
@gfys7562 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_developmentConsidering the fact that the USA was built on genocide and slavery, and has been starting wars across the globe for a century leading to millions of casualties.... Yeah, it kinda makes sense that most younger Americans tend to hate their own country. It's the evil empire.
@koolz765Ай бұрын
If we really went to the moon, explain how we lost the technology that got us there, explain why they lost the original tapes of it? Nasa said these things
@SmasherDobson8443Ай бұрын
Wrong the whole world know it's a lie..
@DatandittoАй бұрын
Thats a lie. The 'moon rocks' handed but to other countries were examined and turned out to be petrified wood from earth. We did not go to the moon. If you spent time going over the facts youd find out or just be a boot licking conformist your whole life.
@ronaldwilson656914 күн бұрын
Well we use to learn science in school. The moon landing was some America's greatest science & engineering accomplishments.
@allenhonaker410710 сағат бұрын
Simply Scarecrow Syndrome. AKA " Life would not be such a strain if I only had a brain" 😂😂😂😂
@leroysiedenburg21397 ай бұрын
Can we see stars in the daylight on PLANET EARTH!!!! VERY RARELY! So why would you expect to see stars on the moon in bright sunlight???
@NYKevin1007 ай бұрын
To be fair, Rayleigh scattering makes it a lot harder on Earth than it would be on the Moon (no atmosphere). But apparently that just doesn't make enough of a difference.
@christopherscott88537 ай бұрын
Open your eyes. I'm disgusted with my own father for his role in perpetuating this illusion. Use your God given brain. No one or vessel has ever been to Mars let alone the moon
@altortugas59797 ай бұрын
That’s an idiotic thing to say.
@christopherscott88537 ай бұрын
@@altortugas5979 says who?
@nightmarexgaming1207 ай бұрын
@@christopherscott8853I don’t believe in god. Yes we did land on the moon. And why would land in mars first?
@digikamikaze4 ай бұрын
As someone who previously worked in film and media production I can tell you he's not lying. Aperture, ISO and fps are factors in every video, even your tik tok videos.
@tubecated_development4 ай бұрын
But your brain works differently than the conspiracy-theorist brain. If they don’t understand it and/or they don’t want to accept it, then that makes it a ‘lie’.
@mihaicolceriu-nicola71484 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_developmentmore like he has a brain,while those idiots lost it somewhere😂
@misterdee14184 ай бұрын
Fake news
@larrykinsella82824 ай бұрын
@@misterdee1418?
@adamstevens32634 ай бұрын
Its because theres alot of fake news online so people dont know what to believe or how to even decern real from fake. So alot of people go with the most "mind blowing facts" theyve heard
@Workerbee-zy5nxАй бұрын
The scary part is the trip up there on that giant missile, landing and getting back on earth..Astronauts are beyond brave.
@user-pj5gq5ql7wАй бұрын
astro (nots) look up the video where Russia reviews the moon landing videos. It is obviously fake. We that know the truth are ridiculed but we don't care. We still out here alive and thriving.
@eilidh771Ай бұрын
Actors ?
@Workerbee-zy5nxАй бұрын
@@eilidh771 If that's fake, then everything is a fake.🤣🤣🤣🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
@rosyc925028 күн бұрын
@@Workerbee-zy5nxNow you're getting it.
@tubecated_development28 күн бұрын
@@Workerbee-zy5nx That’s what conspiracy-theorists fantasise about, and that’s what they want you to believe most of all. They don’t even think physics is real. Luckily they don’t understand physics so although they (as do we all) go through life beholden to (and constrained by) it, they still pretend to dismiss it 😂
@brianedwards71424 ай бұрын
Fun fact- all the "stars" you see out of the windows on Star Trek are sequins sewn onto a black curtain just outside the focal length of the camera so they're blurry.
@I_Stole_A_BTR-802 ай бұрын
Not outside of focal length, but out of focus. Focal length refers to the distance between the center of the lens and the film or sensor.
@edlomonaco2 ай бұрын
Fun fact when a guy has a smooth ken doll package in an underwear ad, it's a slice of wonder bread.
@ct_devoid5 ай бұрын
How terrifying being in space and on the moon must have been, but also exhilarating.
@mr.anderson60405 ай бұрын
Also, your brain development after you were born😂😂😂@user-fb5jr9ih1w
@tubecated_development5 ай бұрын
@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyou forgot evidence to prove your claim.
@Isaac51235 ай бұрын
No way it happened. The american flag stays up by the wind where there is no atmosphere there lol😅@@user-fb5jr9ih1w
@OhRealG5 ай бұрын
@@user-fb5jr9ih1wyes it did
@residentidiot96945 ай бұрын
There is no space. It is all a giant lie. These satanic organisations are orchestrating the space lie. You really think they went to the moon with that foil and umbrella frame pod? Their lie is crumbling just like their fake mars photoshoot. All lies. We lives in an enclosed earth (firmament), the moon and sun are luminaries, lights within our atmosphere. They are not solid and so nothing can land on it.
@johnpurington665928 күн бұрын
Yes what he said. 😊. Logic is often misunderstood by narcissists.
@foxdavion68652 ай бұрын
One thing I've noticed is common with conspiracy theorists, they don't understand basic physics.
@tubecated_development2 ай бұрын
They are mostly scientifically-illiterate. Physics is just one part of it. They most often don’t even have genuine curiosity about anything. The National Science Education Standards (1996) in the USA defined scientific literacy as: "the knowledge and understanding of scientific concepts and processes required for personal decision making, participation in civic and cultural affairs, and economic productivity. Scientific literacy means that a person can ask, find, or determine answers to questions derived from curiosity about everyday experiences. It means that a person has the ability to describe, explain, and predict natural phenomena."
@Mindvirus-ly5ed2 ай бұрын
wrong. you are in denial.
@foxdavion68652 ай бұрын
@@Mindvirus-ly5ed *sniff* I smell a bot.
@reedschrichte8002 ай бұрын
@@Mindvirus-ly5ed Take your meds
@daveb86792 ай бұрын
Basic physics? How about common sense? Why haven’t we returned to moon?
@yfi62dortoh9 ай бұрын
It’s hard enough to take a picture of the stars at night on earth without night mode settings, let alone with a camera from 1969
@castleanthrax18338 ай бұрын
And almost impossible when you aren't intentionally trying to photograph stars.
@castleanthrax18338 ай бұрын
@jmoney6043 Than*
@bretk79168 ай бұрын
This is not accurate at all it's actually pretty easy I just did it the other day just to test the theory I live out in the country and I have a pole light and I was able to photograph the stars along with the roof of my shop at the same time with my Android phone no special settings. Although that is a digital photograph. But in turn film like what they would have used back then reacts to light. Even light from far off distance like stars which would actually be brighter on the surface of the Moon because there would be more frequencies of light like infrared which cameras pick up this is what camera flashes use to illuminate the object your photographing That's why some flashes aren't very bright or even way back when when they used a flame for their flash because if we could see infrared light that flame would be extremely bright.. I guess you wouldn't call it a flame but a very mild explosion I guess you could say
@castleanthrax18338 ай бұрын
@@bretk7916 Humans can't see infra-red light at all, so if a flash is at all visible, there must be some form of light in the visible spectrum. We can only feel infra-red light, otherwise known as heat.
@totoitekelcha76288 ай бұрын
@jmoney6043 why would we need to go back to the moon? Is there an obligation to do so or just to proved to the scumbags in this world that we landed again on the moon? Landing on a moon is not cheap and nobody will used the same rocket and lander and you need to built the whole new system to land and that takes times and a lot of money more than the money spending on the first landing. Can your father sponsored the moon landing again just to proved to his idiot son that we landed on the moon twice?
@XK1773 Жыл бұрын
They faked it but it was hard to emulate on earth, so they filmed it on location
@dandan2593 Жыл бұрын
Wishful thinking!
@frankhtlllful Жыл бұрын
😂
@aribaariba8609 Жыл бұрын
Where ?
@XK1773 Жыл бұрын
@@aribaariba8609 the moon
@michaellawson6926 Жыл бұрын
lmfao
@athnealerodneyАй бұрын
The people who have a hard time accepting facts are usually the same people who readily accept conspiracy theories... 🤔
@Championoflight-lz4yt2 күн бұрын
10:23 the reason I prefer to do it solo is because nobody in my class room is competent enough to study
@davephillips20294 ай бұрын
These are the same people that say the Earth is flat and not a sphere
@blotfd4 ай бұрын
it's level. it's a horizon not a curvizon, c'mon now
@eggabacon4 ай бұрын
It's obviously an obtuse angle that changes degrees throughout the day
@adamstevens32634 ай бұрын
It usually goes hand in hand
@SinoKadafi10919774 ай бұрын
It’s flat and oval shaped
@harleyb78804 ай бұрын
The earth is flat tho
@afropunkx6 ай бұрын
I love how people use their own ignorance as an argument. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it isn’t true.
@thegoat31096 ай бұрын
Like evolution theory or big bang theory?
@numbdigger95526 ай бұрын
@@thegoat3109yeah. Exactly like those
@afropunkx6 ай бұрын
@@thegoat3109 yeah or round earth theory 🤣
@Penaldo_supremacy6 ай бұрын
Yeah, just like people who doesn't understand who God is or how he can exist conclude that he is not true. Yet they can't prove he doesn't exist either.😢
@JohnRapheal76 ай бұрын
How come we only went once and have never been back?
@MichaelHeal9913 күн бұрын
Unfortunately too many people "know" something then refuse to learn that they may be wrong. They perceive correction or debate as an attack rather than reasonable discussion to change their mind.
@kennethmeyer39612 ай бұрын
There's no real denying that we went to the Moon Russia would appointed that out real fast the real question is why haven't we been back on it so easy
@mrwondering2594Ай бұрын
Russia would not point it out because at the time they were using the excuse as well to deceive their people
@eilidh771Ай бұрын
Kenny been raised on TV geopolitics.
@NathanDraxterАй бұрын
They say there is nothing there to be collected or learned, and that would be the reason. Yet China is going there again, so they might disagree
@terrypage358Ай бұрын
Nasa had a blank cheque book back then and took massive risks with people's lives to get it done. There's been no political or scientific reason to take such risks since then, especially when they can use rovers instead. Does seem like there's a good enough reason to go back now, seeing as there are profits to be made.
@tubecated_developmentАй бұрын
It was never ‘easy’, (nor inexpensive). There really is no question as to why they didn’t go back since the sixth landing…
@thoubias8 ай бұрын
Judging from the level of different technologies back in the day, I bet faking it convincingly was harder than actually doing it.
@tubecated_development8 ай бұрын
Correct.
@Da_Infamous7 ай бұрын
Well I've seen Leonardo decapreo or how ever his last name is spelled..... but I've seen him die from the Titanic and thst ship went down like 40 years before he was even born..... I've also seen "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away some little "orphan" blow up a giant man made planet called the "death star" and if we really went to the moon the United States would be sending the moon money..... just sayin
@Da_Infamous7 ай бұрын
So..... its a good thing the gobment wouldn't LIE to us about getting to the moon..... so if "they" say we went than we totally did
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@Da_Infamous Opinions and feelyweelies, vs physics and falsifiable evidence? I always choose physics. Your mileage may vary.
@connorpfeifer75497 ай бұрын
how’d they get thru the van allen belt?plus, The vacuum on the moon is almost perfect while in lower Earth orbit it's basically still thin air. Such a vacuum needs to be sealed by at least a couple of inches of metal not just zippers and fabrics. This vacuum can even weld metals together and can't be simulated on Earth in this extreme.
@harleydad19755 ай бұрын
I still can't understand how they got there with "ancient" tech and in 2024 it's so challenging.
@tubecated_development5 ай бұрын
They aren’t planning to redo the Apollo mission, any more than they planning to go to the bottom of the ocean in homemade submarine like they did in 1960. but what happened to the Titan submersible last year? New technology doesn’t mean automatically safe and doable.. Technology has moved on, and so have the challenges. longer missions, new trajectories to different parts of space, diff regions of the moon. All of the microtechnology and new comms requirements present their own challenges. Especially around life-support systems. microtechnology is more vulnerable to space radiation. There is also the not inconsiderable fact that Apollo took about 2% of the federal budget - while the last moon mission was about 0.1% of that.
@Foolish1885 ай бұрын
The Apollo program was incredibly expensive. And convincing Congress that NASA needed both the Saturn Rocket program and the Space Shuttle proved to be impossible.
@Nuke-MarsX5 ай бұрын
Today there are a lot of regulation holding us back, and also today there is no reason to go there. Back then they wanted to beat soviet union in the race
@lancehaysom475 ай бұрын
All to do with $$. They spent a lot of money back then govt backed. Now it is private money and relatively a lot smaller $$
@tubecated_development5 ай бұрын
@@lancehaysom47 Is there a ‘private’ space company which doesn’t have NASA as their primary customer?
@matthewjaniss41038 күн бұрын
To quote an engineer friend of mine " It would have been harder and more expensive to fake the moon landing than to actually go to the moon". Now im sure that was a bit of hyperbole but ill trust the licensed engineer before some random kook.
@tehice23Ай бұрын
Its even simpler, Its the same thing as on earth, in day/sun light, there are no visible stars. There would be visible if the missions would be done in the shadows. And are visible on night time photos.
@KayKay11411 ай бұрын
One thing ive never heard argued....why didn't the Soviets call them out? They certainly would have if it was fake.
@skophansen952511 ай бұрын
Read Anthony Ciril Sutton's books from 70s and 80s and you will figure it out. US's and SSSR's oligarchy were cooperating together behind people's back. Obviously, you can't jear about that in Legacy media.
@branako220511 ай бұрын
Probably because the US has something on Russia and China too. After over 50 years why hasn’t another rover or orbiter or satellite taken a picture of the flag and original moon rover? Even the Hubble telescope could probably take a decent picture of them.
@vijayvijay412311 ай бұрын
Honour among the scoundrels
@erniemckracken159311 ай бұрын
Worlds a stage full of actors. WCW wrestling and politics, no difference.
@bjornfeuerbacher551411 ай бұрын
@@skophansen9525 Yes, dude. Something like the Cold War never happened. Sure. :D
@ulkairvillan321910 ай бұрын
NASA are not idiots but they know most people are.
@pops85959 ай бұрын
exactly!
@lazymass9 ай бұрын
Mostly people that really to this day think earth is flat, space doesnt exist and we weren't on the moon...
@joshuaphillips7559 ай бұрын
I'm an idiot and I know most people are
@pops85959 ай бұрын
@@lazymass the guy believes that some human being stepped on the moon, LOL
@lazymass9 ай бұрын
@@pops8595 well... you know, education does a lot for one... You should try it some day...
@gar0188Күн бұрын
I think one of the astronauts (can’t remember which one at the moment) even said that there were ufos sitting in a crater watching them. That must’ve been terrifying for the astronauts.
@sevesetupou58748 күн бұрын
I mean they got 2 astronauts stuck in space right now, so like... yeah.
@Aroncare2 ай бұрын
STANLEY KUBRICK IS A GREAT FILM MAKER
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth2 ай бұрын
So?
@ckarodipolicethepolice23012 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Trobtwillis2 ай бұрын
Yeah. 2001: A Space Odyssey That's a great science fiction film. It is very different from NASA documentary films. Y r u SHOUTING?
@MelissaCraig-lh1km2 ай бұрын
EXaCtLy. THeY cAnT get paSt the VaN AlLeN rAdIaTiON bELT eVeR.
@randygonzalez62502 ай бұрын
@@TrobtwillisI think he's not impressed with Kubrick's moon footage, all caps or "shouting" often denotes sarcasm.
@diegolisandror24 ай бұрын
Stanley Kubrick definitely was not an idiot
@topherkrock4 ай бұрын
He had nothing to do with the missions to the Moon.
@VideoRandomChannel3 ай бұрын
@@topherkrocknot true, space Odyssey was inspired by something whether you want to believe that or not
@topherkrock3 ай бұрын
@@VideoRandomChannel, that's not what I was saying. We landed on the moon.
@dejanve3 ай бұрын
Exactly!
@topherkrock2 ай бұрын
Was there a reason for mentioning Kubrick? Are you saying that you don't know how to use a _search engine?_
@rascaligan812216 сағат бұрын
If you cherry pick pieces of it, it appears to be faked. But once you know the full story, you realize that it is true and it makes you realize that them going and succeeding wasnt just impressive, it was miraculous.
@BarbarosGunes3 күн бұрын
From going to the moon, leaving the astronauts in the space lab ... Are they idiots? 🤣
@AmericanFlyOnTheWall Жыл бұрын
My grandmother always said, “We never sent nobody to no moon! They filmed all that mess at night out in Arizona or Utah!” 😆
@j-bob_oreo Жыл бұрын
she just sounds lovely ... did she make good cookies though?
@dennisburt4614 Жыл бұрын
I have zero trust in any government
@davesargent7304 Жыл бұрын
Your pants are on fire
@glebmak6258 Жыл бұрын
U are correct and it's one world govt !!!
@stevenbryant471811 ай бұрын
But who can you really trust anyway? You have a point somewhere? Go down in that private, unregulated submarine. Offical government projects get more scrutiny. Whether or just there is follow up depends on who is voted in charge. Just for profit means the money is the important part andeverything else fends for itself. Yeah, it was all a Hollywood movie. Have you ever visited a Saturn rocket?
@lakhbinderjitsingh779510 ай бұрын
True never ever believe government of any countries that claim they Landed on light meaning 🌝 or 🌞 is just lights above our ground including stars. 🙏😇👁️💫👁️💡✨
@lovemyself21710 ай бұрын
like the government even care about you
@SaintLSonАй бұрын
Thank you! I'd also heard that, taking the amount of light/brightness into account, no lighting system of the day could have reproduced such light saturation.
@DemoNinja792 ай бұрын
There are two types of moon landing conspiracy theorists : those who say the astronauts never landed on the moon (ie: the landing was faked) and those who say that the astronauts did land on the moon and encountered the UFOs watching them. Either way both groups still agree with either conspiracy, which is wild.
@tubecated_developmentАй бұрын
there are more types than that ! those who say later missions were real, but the early ones were faked! those who say they went but the photographs were faked! those who say some of them went but the film footage was faked, etc.
@cpK054LАй бұрын
No one is calling it a conspiracy, they're calling it a hoax. Get a better bit programming
@DemoNinja79Ай бұрын
@@cpK054L nobody cares.
@cpK054LАй бұрын
@@DemoNinja79 you do apparently, hence the post
@tubecated_developmentАй бұрын
@@cpK054L “No-one is calling it a conspiracy” Is this a new conspiracy-theory you are starting? Right here? Are you telling me that when film director Stanley Kubrick and a couple of Nazis and JFK all got together in secret at the South Pole and decided to conspire to lie to the world and steal hundreds billions tax-dollars to fake 7 moon-landing missions to both fool the USSR and to enrich themselves and their contractors… …you are telling me that there was no ‘conspiracy’? Is this the ‘conspiracy was not a conspiracy’, conspiracy-theory? It was just a ‘hoax’? Like putting a rubber spider in the tub to make your sister freak?
@bruceconstuble46032 ай бұрын
They're not idiots , they've just sold out.
17 күн бұрын
ok smart guy between the 180 degrees C in the sun and the -160 degrees in shadow, so what type of film survives these temps, the camera was stock unmodified, physics? you can't even tell me what the melting point of Kodak Tri-X film is but claim i'm the dum one
@darwingreenheart12 күн бұрын
i think you're responding to your assumption that the op believes the cameras would've captured the stars, but he didn't say anything about a camera, he's just talking about nasa. i do disagree tho, nasa is part of the government. billions of tax dollars goes to them every year. u can't sell out to a group you're already a member of.
@_maqpie_8 ай бұрын
Thats why you see more stars outside of the city. City lights do the same to our eyes 👍
@bretk79168 ай бұрын
Light on Earth and on the surface of the moon act completely different. You don't have what they call light pollution on the surface of the Moon. And you don't have an atmosphere that absorbs and reflects light. It does let some frequencies of light through of course. But this means that the stars would be bigger and brighter from the surface of the Moon due to no degradation of light being blocked by dust and other things in the air along with the atmosphere. So they would be much brighter and bolder. Especially if we had a camera because they pick up infrared light that we cannot see..
@mr_koko20708 ай бұрын
@@bretk7916 You're somewhat right, that's why the moon's horizon seems so bold in the videos and pictures from the surface of the moon, but it doesn't change the fact that you can't see the stars - camera, just as your eyes, tries to correct itself to see the bright thing. You can try it out with just a lamp and the camera on your smartphone; if you turn of the lights and turn on the lamp, and try rotating around the room, then you'll see the rest of the room become darker when you point the camera at the lamp. You can imagine that the lamp is the moon (since it's very reflective) and the rest of the room is open space with stars.
@trillex18618 ай бұрын
@@bretk7916You dont understand how dynamic range works. Cameras have less dynamic range than our eyes. If you want to see the stars in the image, the surface of the moon would be to bright.
@bretk79168 ай бұрын
@@trillex1861 this is not true for one the moon absorbs 85% of the light shined upon it from the Sun what does reflect it's not exactly scattered light because there is no other medium in space for light to reflect or refract off of you can tell this by the grayish color of their space suits but when they were on the surface of the Earth they were bright white. The only time the Sun is super bright when you're in space is when you look at it it's not like walking outside after being in the movie theater and it just super bright outside it doesn't work like that there. And as far as your comment about the dynamic range. Unfortunately for you I do know a little bit about it and the camera that they use was a 70 mm black and white film camera which has huge dynamic range especially being in black and white because even with color film the dynamic range is still exceptionally high especially for the blacks and whites. Also in space there is no light pollution or restriction on the light produced from stars along with the continuum in space light just continues on without no degradation so stars would be much brighter and bolder on the surface of the moon...
@bretk79168 ай бұрын
@@trillex1861 IMAX uses 70 mm colored film. And if you ever been to one of them you know the dynamic range is very vast.. digital does not have near the dynamic range and I am able to take a picture of the roof of my shop with the stars at the same time
@pappadappacarhauler7575 ай бұрын
NASA may not be idiots but they do think that we are.
@maymei67425 ай бұрын
Those that agree with this video is absolutely idiots... don't they know space is vacumn ... ie no air and wind.... Why the flag that Neil Amstrong put on d moon is waving!!! Yes NASA was idiot as they couldn't simulate a vacumn environment
@JSun30005 ай бұрын
FACTS💯
@lucasrenz39845 ай бұрын
we kinda are in terms of knowledge base
@unreachablehorizons86245 ай бұрын
You are
@powbobs5 ай бұрын
Explain
@retubey3 күн бұрын
And the people saying the flag was waving meaning there was wind... No there wasn't any wind and it was just wiggling around because the Astronomer was moving it around 😂
@tanelehala6422Ай бұрын
If there *were* stars in the background, conspiracy theorists would appeal to that But it's not only aperture, it's the shutter speed and film sensitivity as well.
17 күн бұрын
between the 180 degrees C in the sun and the -160 degrees in shadow, so what type of film survives these temps, the camera was stock unmodified
@BinkyStalls9 ай бұрын
Extraterrestrial here. I can confirm there are stars during the day but you can’t see them.
@geno4825 Жыл бұрын
NASA threw him $20
@gazw959511 ай бұрын
Nasa threw him some moon rock....
@HelloWorld-lh1wk11 ай бұрын
dude he is the man who removed pluto from the planet list and you are talking about $20
@SSK07711 ай бұрын
😂😂
@dollwatibhat22111 ай бұрын
May be ur parents should have thrown 20$ on your education 🤷♀️🤷♂️
@joewinston713211 ай бұрын
FlatEarthers threw you 2$
@TinyTako4723 күн бұрын
One thing about Neal is he’s going to defend the status quo and the scientific establishment to the death
@bobmusil1458Ай бұрын
NVIDIA has a lot of experience with creating realistic images for games. They checked the pictures from the Moon and found they are not faked!
@ralfiejr3420 күн бұрын
Because why would the most valuable company on earth say otherwise....smh
@bobmusil145820 күн бұрын
@@ralfiejr34 Maybe you should just watch den NVIDIA video before spreading some more conspiracy nonsense?
17 күн бұрын
between the 180 degrees C in the sun and the -160 degrees in shadow, so what type of film survives these temps, the camera was stock unmodified, oh thats right you never did the math but like to call us dum
@bobmusil145816 күн бұрын
1. The temperature on the Moon is between 120° and -130° C. (Not 180° to -160°) 2. The astronauts (and the cameras) never were in Moon's night. So, they never experienced the freezing deep temperatures. 3. The cameras *were modified!* There were several modifications but the important one for your "argument" is, the cameras got a silver finish to minimize heat up by sun light. Also, the cameras had no contact to the hot moon surface, direct heat flow from solid to solid was not possible. Moon has no atmosphere, heat transfer by gas was impossible too. It's always the same with the conspiracy lunatics. You always think that your own experience (= lack thereof), your own knowledge (= lack thereof) is a valid argument. It's not!
15 күн бұрын
@@bobmusil1458 Kodak film has specific temperature ratings to ensure optimal performance: Consumer Films and Single Use Cameras: Store at temperatures up to 21°C (70°F). Avoid excessive heat, such as in a car parked in the sun1. Professional Color Films: Store in their original sealed packaging under refrigeration at 13°C (55°F) or lower1. Color Papers and Display Materials: Store between 4°C and 24°C (40°F and 75°F) in the original sealed package1. Black-and-White Films: For short periods, store at temperatures up to 24°C (75°F). For longer periods, maintain lower temperatures1.
@pennyarcade77727 ай бұрын
I have watched Formula 1 on tv from countries that have a night race. If you glimpse the sky it is completely black, no stars but you do see the moon.
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
Must of been NASA/NIKON cameras
@robertramsey6537 ай бұрын
Same with high school football games.
@SAN-bi2vm7 ай бұрын
@tubecated_development Lmao you are even gramaticaly incorrect.
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@SAN-bi2vm so what? Doesn’t mean NASA ARENT LYING You shouldn’t be convinced, it’s all lies and that’s what you want to believe. If you want to check that NASA are controlling our cameras now and removing our ability to see and photograph stars near the moon, just image- search online, any image of “super zoom moon night” See what I mean? They’re trying to cover their tracks by controlling our cameras, not allowing our cameras to see stars near the moon.
@peeperleviathan28397 ай бұрын
Those races are very illuminated and are near city’s
@skatepark029 ай бұрын
You can do this at home. Set your camera to auto, or use a phone. Look around a room at night with a lamp on, you can see the room. Now point the camera at the lamp, the room turns black and the lamp becomes correctly exposed. The lamp represents the earth and moon, the room is your stars.
@Fatality.0.0.8 ай бұрын
But you are not at home ur on Moon,there is vacoom,there no atmosphere!
@utkarsh_katiyar8 ай бұрын
Wow man, great analogy. Thanks 🙏
@lisakuntzman78348 ай бұрын
Wackado
@rickkwitkoski19768 ай бұрын
Exactly! But photography numpties just don't get it.
@OliviaCerrano8 ай бұрын
Makes no sense lmao
@Ausaini1713 күн бұрын
Ah! I remember when I had my first Perc. Landed on the moon and walked around for 40 days and 40 nights. No air, just a pack of Newports and a fifth of Henny. Achieved escape velocity jumping towards earth. Landed in Geneva. Aw man I did it again didn’t I!?
@allanjstark20 күн бұрын
It also would be impossible in 1969 to fake the sunlight in a studio with the tec of this years
17 күн бұрын
lol how did Stanley do it in 2001 then
@iamrysheem15 күн бұрын
I dont know if the moon landing was faked or not because I wasnt there but saying it would be impossible with 1969 tech i dont know what tech was available to the US government either. I just feel like this all boils down to what you want to believe because like I said nobody was there. You literally have people in isolation telling you something happened.
@user-qe6in7yt2l15 күн бұрын
1969 isn’t 2001 we had way better tech in 2001 then in 1969
@Tee95410 күн бұрын
32 years later, that'd be like comparing 2033 tech with 2001 tech, look at our exponential growth and you'd see there are huge changes that happened between 1969 and 2001
10 күн бұрын
@@user-qe6in7yt2l the movie dummy
@Joe1qz4 ай бұрын
This is basically the same as when I wake up in the middle of the night and turn on the light of the washroom. I can't see anything...for a few seconds! A camera isn't as sophisticated as our eyes!
@xbrandi12345x4 ай бұрын
You wake up and turn on a light? 😂 I do everything in the dark haha
@lucasread17434 ай бұрын
@@xbrandi12345xI assume you wake up very early
@RalphSampson...4 ай бұрын
@@lucasread1743 No. You wake up late.
@michaelr33334 ай бұрын
People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.
@xxredshiftxx4 ай бұрын
So if the camera can't image the stars , the Astronauts would be able to , I find picturing such a sight much more impressive for a life changing experience.
@JSSTyger Жыл бұрын
They're laughing at flat-Earthers.
@johngavin1175 Жыл бұрын
Flat earthers are insane
@dodgersallday4290 Жыл бұрын
There’s plenty of non-flat-earthers that think the moon landing was faked
@MediaSubliminal Жыл бұрын
Doesn't everyone? It's really easy to prove that the earth is not flat
@Jordy-927 Жыл бұрын
@@MediaSubliminal not if you disregard real science and make up your own. 🤣
@FusionSimulations Жыл бұрын
@Jordy-927 I'm assuming you're one who believes the Earth is flat. And that you somehow know the "real science", that proves the hundreds and thousands of scientists before us and currently - that have all replicated results - wrong?
@basic5714 күн бұрын
They don't even know how far the moon is. They can not measure the speed of light accurately.
@aeringothyk54459 күн бұрын
Dunning-Krugers out in force
@coreycole33167 ай бұрын
I like how we explain stuff we learned in school to those that never paid attention
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
KZfaq comments for conspiracy-nutz is like an even more broken adult version of their childhood selves getting others to do their homework. EDIT: On close inspection you realise that their ‘questions’ aren’t even real questions, it’s just idiotic ‘gotcha’ rhetoric, as they’re not even remotely interested in learning, they’re not genuinely curious about anything.
@user-tc3yu7jh1b7 ай бұрын
That's because they need to push the lie still
@MonkeyDLuffy-cm4fm7 ай бұрын
I was the class clown and I already know this. 🤣😂
@PayToPlaySS7 ай бұрын
we? ur just a viewer lol
@DM-wu5hn7 ай бұрын
For some people, the world is much duller, less surrounded by lures, but not that bad.
@cenozoaband5 ай бұрын
Imagine Buzz Aldrin, who lives in this age. He went to the moon and back, one of the first. He risked his life, he did experiments up there. Only to have some guys today erasing his and the other astronauts' contributions. This is insane
@jangtheconqueror5 ай бұрын
Those idiots couldn't erase the accomplishments of the Apollo missions with their silly little theories. It does highlight the need for better education standards in the US though
@cenozoaband5 ай бұрын
@@jangtheconqueror I agree, but just imagine how these guys feel when they come across such people..
@kylecrowson14175 ай бұрын
I'm sure he doesn't take them very seriously.
@Yesbutactuallyno1235 ай бұрын
Iirc he or one of the other apollo astronauts literally beat someone up over it so i think they do care Again i could be wrong@kylecrowson1417
@sakurashogun5 ай бұрын
You don't have to imagine, it is on record even recently there is video of Buzz beating common sense into some of these wackos.
@allgood6760Ай бұрын
Good explanation 📷... I saw Buzz Aldrin speak for an hour here in NZ in 2010 about his experience ON the Moon and in space and Neil Armstrong said it would be harder to fake than to succeed.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿🚀
@eilidh771Ай бұрын
Well if he said that its a slam dunk, logic is like a light sabre in your hands.
@allgood6760Ай бұрын
@@eilidh771 Yes and Dalai Lama says don't settle for less than logic and experience.. I agree👍
@neilcooАй бұрын
I would love to hear doubters excuses for how we can still bounce a laser off the same laser reflector that the astronauts intentionally left there.
@XPISigmaArt9 ай бұрын
It's funny how the comment section still believes NASA forgot to fake the stars in the photographs. People are wild.
@xTROLLINGx8 ай бұрын
Wait until they realize the astronauts never filmed the earth when all they had to do was point their cameras up since they had landed on the near side of the moon. They couldn't fake the earth in a film but they could with a still image.
@tubecated_development8 ай бұрын
@@xTROLLINGxhow would live footage of the Earth have looked any better/different than a still? What film cameras were they using?
@xTROLLINGx8 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development it would have looked the same way as when they recorded themselves on the Rover they have more footages of that Rover than they do of Earth.
@tubecated_development8 ай бұрын
@@xTROLLINGx You didn’t answer my question tho. What camera was that? And what would they have gained by filming the Earth with that camera vs the stills camera/s?
@xTROLLINGx8 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development Two cameras were equipped with 60-millimeter focal length lenses; the other had a high-resolution 500-millimeter lens enough to record the earth if they had pointed it up. They would have gained a new perspective from the moon of earth to share with the world since they were all about winning the cold war and not for an actual accomplishment which is why they haven't returned to the moon if they even can because who deletes a blueprint that can help humanity in their future.
@robertborden26665 ай бұрын
In the Apollo 13 story, the crew had to align their navigation at some point and their main trouble was they didn’t have a visual on any stars due to the brightness given off by earth and the sun itself. Once they realized they had a very big known star to look at (our sun), they got it together and made their calculations. It’s indeed very hard to see stars when the big, bright planet it sitting in your face.
@michaelr33334 ай бұрын
People that were there, before they passed away, admitted the moon photos were fake. And it was taken in a plane hanger, and they spread cement dust and other dust all on the ground. And fooled people. Then they said they lost the blueprints to go to the moon. "By chance" And now we are all currently trying to make it there.
@FishnChips13613 күн бұрын
Of course that makes sense. NASA would absolutely know that people would pick up on the fact that you COULDN'T see stars in the background so, by showing stars it WOULD jeopardize the video.
@greggoreo6738Ай бұрын
You Two are Kings of Repartée! BRAVO! MARK TWAIN would revel in your witty intellectualism! Laughter and learning go so well together, hand in hand! Love you Guys! Respecfully yours Gregg Oreo Long Beach CA Etats Unis
@traddy1 Жыл бұрын
Try to take a nice picture of the night sky on earth! It’s hard! 😂
@Agarwaen Жыл бұрын
try to do it during the day instead, as the case was during apollo lunar EVAs.
@ebreshea Жыл бұрын
@@Agarwaen Earth has a heavy atmosphere, which scatters light from the sun, basically washing out whatever light might be coming from the stars. Neil's point is about apertures, which is something completely different.
@Agarwaen Жыл бұрын
@@ebreshea except no. stars wouldn't be be visible to your eyes during the day if we lacked an atmosphere either. only specific wavelengths are even affected by this scattering, so there's no reason why stars wouldn't be visible if they were supposed to be on the surface of the moon. the limiting factor is how much light can get to the sensor (or film) and if you're going to take photos in a situation where most light is FAR stronger then you just have to set up your camera in the manner that means you just cannot catch faint objects like stars, unless you want the rest of your image to be almost entirely white.
@philipm3173 Жыл бұрын
Long exposure
@DanielleAlessandra Жыл бұрын
How cool would it be if a billionaire made a hotel of the moon I would definitely go instead of spending $250,000 to go visit the titanic I would go to the moon hotel any day of the week you get to be in a spaceship you get to view earth from the moon that sounds like a lot more fun
@erlanggacn9034 Жыл бұрын
The more you defend a lie, the angrier you become.” - Mitch Albom
@Tuface_Killa97 Жыл бұрын
Never heard this one
@Clicks-Prosper Жыл бұрын
Naw
@silvercenturion4214 Жыл бұрын
Neil isn’t lying
@cyberpunk11x Жыл бұрын
Neil Tyson is an actor.
@rogemillecastillo3183 Жыл бұрын
Made up quote...
@ericaasen4512Ай бұрын
Especially cameras in the 60s. People think those guys brought fkn iphones up there
@tver8413 күн бұрын
Anyone who knows how a camera + lens works, knows the anwser. And this is completely accurate.
@evilsharkey89546 ай бұрын
Anyone who’s ever tried to take a picture of the moon can tell you that you won’t get stars in the picture unless the moon is a glaring white blob.
@tubecated_development6 ай бұрын
It makes you realise how few people have ever taken a photo of the moon (or have even looked at a photo of the moon)
@tbengineering70665 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development or really paid attention to how they take photos. Look at how they argue that NASA uses CGI. Yeah, they are right, it is CGI. But the CGI used isn't to fake something, but to create a composite photo. What NASA does is no different than the Panorama or Spherical Mode we have on our cameras, which is take snapshots and combine all of them into one picture. And if you ever actually looked at your pictures after using those two modes, you will notice that they are quite accurate to what you see around you (though with some artifact errors due to your movement or things moving around you).
@tubecated_development5 ай бұрын
@@tbengineering7066 I know this. Agreed.
@jasonjuarez64295 ай бұрын
Yeah... that's not true
@tubecated_development5 ай бұрын
@@jasonjuarez6429 Go do an image search (guess you’re too lazy to do the experiment yourself with a zoom camera) Search ‘full moon zoom’ Count the stars around the moon. Oops. Go look at the HD footage of the IM-Lander separating from Falcon 9. Again, count the stars… Oops. It’s like your default is ‘lie about stuff’
@theMVPeet7 ай бұрын
Same as how you can barely see any stars in the city but in the woods or mounts you'll see tons of them
@kamikeserpentail37787 ай бұрын
@MotersickleBumuhhh... Are you implying there's less atmosphere in the woods? The guy above you is talking about light pollution. Unless you're just emulating the people who say we haven't landed on the moon, but then satire isn't always easy to read in text.
@theresadeflitch839726 күн бұрын
Wish you had taught in my science class, you explain on a basic level then branch out. The cool thing is I learn something new every time I see you. Thank you
17 күн бұрын
learn this, between the 180 degrees C in the sun and the -160 degrees in shadow, so what type of film survives these temps, the camera was stock unmodified
@aalawson827515 күн бұрын
You know what makes more sense, the fact that anything that tries to come into orbit onto our planet, gets burnt up to a crisp. So answer that....
@govindmishra79386 ай бұрын
"no amount of evidence can persuade an idiot ."
@patrickjane20246 ай бұрын
well the more people question the narrative the better.americans like to claim this is not fake to make themselves look superior than other countries.
@topherkrock6 ай бұрын
@@patrickjane2024, there's a difference between "questioning the narrative" and "rejecting the truth". Answer me this: what is the narrative that you are questioning? What is the purpose of your questioning? If you want the truth, should you reject all the answers that don't fit your personal bias or should you question your bias if it doesn't fit the answers you're getting?
@shy404usernotfound6 ай бұрын
@@patrickjane2024 but..... we DID do it. If saying that as a fact, makes you & your country "feel" inferior, then that's a you problem. Not ours.
@Soul.Is.Willing6 ай бұрын
Nasa in hebrew means to deceive
@tubecated_development6 ай бұрын
@@patrickjane2024The more people get to undermine the truth, the more people will claim that it was ‘fake’. And the more Americans will hate their own people.
@mildredcordero494911 ай бұрын
My question is, what satellite did they use for the phone calls?
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth11 ай бұрын
Normally communication during the Apollo Missions was using Unified S-Band signals on The Manned Space Flight Network set of tracking stations and giant satellite dishes positioned around the globe such as Goldstone, Madrid, Parkes and Honeysuckle Creek. The only "phone call" that I know of to be patched into this system was The Nixon Call to Apollo 11 on 20 July 1969 and this to the best of my knowledge was patched through a satellite over the Pacific, most likely either INTELSAT-2B or INTELSAT-2D. Take care.
@Intense_Cloud11 ай бұрын
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth I appreciate your kind replies, despite the questions or statements you are to reply. Thank you.
@nuriy_elhasibuanalie11 ай бұрын
Satellite is fake! Someone said communication is only able to be reached by cable optic ! Someone kindly give me an enlightenment, please !
@Oxley01611 ай бұрын
@@nuriy_elhasibuanalie if only cable communications work then how do mobile phones and radios work?
@nuriy_elhasibuanalie11 ай бұрын
@Oxley016 This is also what I am questioning! But a popular person said so, that satelite is fake business! If the satellite can work to give the signal, then why do we need to stake cabble optic even under the sea?
@sbg9112 ай бұрын
For those who don't believe, here's 4 words for you: Lunar Laser Retro-Reflectors.
@brianmcdonald65192 ай бұрын
Yes!! Those were actually mentioned in an episode of Big Bang Theory! Reflectors set up on the moon by the Apollo astronauts!
@daweskjvАй бұрын
Yup! Moon landing denial is just reality denial. It’s so unbelievably obvious that we went to the moon, it’s scary what people will believe with zero evidence.
@Nothing._-Ай бұрын
Your 4 words are meaningless and not provable, I’m not arguing for or against the moon landing but you have no evidence either
@eugene9852Ай бұрын
And how many people have access to the equipment to actually test that? This isn't a persuasive argument for lunar landing deniers. I'm not one of those people, but just saying. If you say you know humans landed on the moon because they've placed reflectors there, the obvious response would be "Prove it!". The only people with access to a suitable laser, and the know-how to function it, would already believe in the moon landing.
@sbg911Ай бұрын
@eugene9852 🤣 Are you serious dude? Astrophysicists use the reflectors every day to measure the distance the moon is retreating from the Earth, currently 3 or so cm per year. But hey, they are probably a natural occuring phenomena up there right? 🤡
@isaac1984282 ай бұрын
The same people who don’t believe in the *moon landing* do believe in *big foot/Sasquatch* and that *the earth is flat* so if you keep going straight, you’ll eventually fall off the edge of the earth according to their logic. 😂
@kxr842Ай бұрын
you would think that with the technology we have now there would have been over one thousand expeditions to the moon. but none have been made ever since the propaganda stun.
@user-qe6in7yt2l15 күн бұрын
@@kxr842ok i will educate you now sk we can easily go back to the moon if we wanted to but there are 3 problems 1 the cost its just way too expensive 2 it could be dangerous for humans 3 what would we do on the moon? There is nothing there
@kxr84213 күн бұрын
@@user-qe6in7yt2l that is because it was a hoax and anti soviet propaganda. the soviet union were beating the west when it came to space exploration. so they had to come up with the moon landing hoax.
@GrnXnham7 ай бұрын
Moon landing hoaxers are at about the same level of credibility as flat earthers.
@never_give_up907 ай бұрын
Aren't they the same people?
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@never_give_up90no. Often, but not always, not even close.
@MrDrluv847 ай бұрын
You sound like someone with a booster shot..
@never_give_up907 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development well, the ones I seem to meet are always both. I meant, the same people, not the same denials.
@user-du4oy7ul6n7 ай бұрын
No many scientist belive that moon landing is a hoax
@kimhorton61095 ай бұрын
I had an Uncle who’s worked on Lasers for the US around this time. NASA was looking at them for distance measurements and such. We watched the Lunar landing at his house that day. I believe every bit of it.
@zachnoll62455 ай бұрын
My managers mom AND dad worked for the apollo missions (cant remember which ones and think they worked on several of them) and he gets very upset when people try and say the moon landing was fake. Like personally offended and he can shoot down all their counter points like he's speed running COD.
@FUNNYMANERICWHITE4 ай бұрын
@zachnoll6245 just curious, did he ever go to the moon or seen others do it from position
@zachnoll62454 ай бұрын
Its critical thinkig, wether they worked on just the math for vectors or worked with engineering or any of the other 400,000 jobs they had to do. They worked on it. They know it was possible because math never lies. Like when the we asked one of the scientist who worked on the nuclear bomb if they ever thought it might not work he said No, he knew exactly what was gonna happen and how big it was going to be (did mention a thing about numbers on a page get so beg they can become impossible for the human mind to comprend and once seeing it go off didnt expect it to be so massive) @@FUNNYMANERICWHITE
@OM19_MO794 ай бұрын
@@zachnoll6245 Offended by what? That people can’t believe some Americans and later some Russians went to the moon 50 years ago and that was it? They should be embarrassed to have been part of a disguised battle for world supremacy in a war that’s still being fought and we’ll all lose. Why don’t we go to the moon? Because the real answer is not that it was fake, but we went there to define who would own the world for the following decade or two. We don’t go now because it’s pointless, there are no rewards, space exploration is physically impossible, sci-fi magic is not real to make us go beyond the moon and back safely, fast, with long stays with benefits for everyone. Today, Russians rather want to destroy their enemies and conquer the world than going to the moon while Americans are on the brink of both the end of democracy and a civil war. At least with the “we never went to the moon” answer you don’t end up disappointed in mankind.
@kozmiclando4 ай бұрын
@@zachnoll6245So Basically U Know Someone That Knows Someone Who Pushes Nasa Lies…Good For U 👏🏿
@OfficalBalascioFilmsАй бұрын
You gotta be angry to be the first men on the moon only for some idiots to look at you and say… “naaah.”
@SeanCasey-q2g10 күн бұрын
The shooter got eight shots off after being completely visible and visibly armed in the snipers. That was also a failure.
@PatriceFERLET6 ай бұрын
Anyway, a friend of mine one day told me that the moon photographies are faked for this reason. I told him to take a photo outside (at night, anyway) of his car. Taking attention that the sky is in the view. He saw no stars. Then I could explain that the exposition time + the light in the streets avoid having so low lights from the stars. Excuse my English.
@tubecated_development6 ай бұрын
Next time on a clear night, ask him to take a super-zoom photograph of the Moon’s surface ;) or even to do an image search for some…
@smik25187 ай бұрын
Honestly now when Neil De Grasse Tyson said it, I may start to doubt that USA actually landed on the moon
@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth7 ай бұрын
So you base your decisions on personalities rather than evidence? Interesting.
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
Your S.M.A.R.T. smart. NDGT dun goofed when he started covering for NASA/NIKON!!! I found that NASA are removing our stars off of cameras to try and cover up. WHY when I take close up pics of the moon on my Nikon P1000 superzoom camera I can’t see stars around it???????? Look for yourself online to prove me right (do an image search of ‘superzoom nikon moon night’ ). What do you see? Correct. You can see the moon but NO STARS. Are Nikon secretly owned by NASA? Think about the word Nikon ie N(ASA) + Ikon literally means _deceitful image_ in Hebrew and Greek… As for the ‘flag' well it’s the same as the rest of there dumb movies, The director left clues and made everything wrong like clues. So people of the future when the Internets made us smart could uncover all there lies.
@vpansf7 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_developmentI don't have a power to debunk all of these, but I can assure you “Ikon" doesn't mean ti deceive, I can't even find a translation or the word in a Dictionary.
@tubecated_development7 ай бұрын
@@vpansf IKON means image lmaoooooooo. I even typed it
@vpansf7 ай бұрын
@@tubecated_development You said IKON means to deceive, where did you get that information?
@marcchauharjasingh69446 күн бұрын
I can verify this..... take a pic of something close with a flash and see if anything in the background shows up