Does the S.H.I.E.L.D. Quinjet Design Make Sense?

  Рет қаралды 262,828

Generation Films

Generation Films

Күн бұрын

The S.H.I.E.L.D. Quinjet is the latest in hybrid carrier fighters deployed by the Avengers in the Marvel films. We take a look at the Quinjet's design and look at what makes sense and what doesn't.
FACEBOOK: / generationfilms
INSTAGRAM: / thegenerationfilms
What we're reading and watching: www.amazon.com/shop/generatio...
FOLLOW OUR HOSTS
American Ben: / @americanbenjamin
Allen Xie: / thebeardedasianman
Ben Hedges: / benhedgesntd

Пікірлер: 673
@alderwolf7687
@alderwolf7687 4 жыл бұрын
As an aircraft mechanic, one thing really sticks out like a sore thumb and that is the question where does it store it's fuel, assuming it runs on jet fuel at all. Aircraft store most, it not all, their fuel in their wings and this thing has its wing internal spaces taken up by lift engines.
@Im-mv6bf
@Im-mv6bf 4 жыл бұрын
plot tanks
@alderwolf7687
@alderwolf7687 4 жыл бұрын
@@Im-mv6bf Apparently I guess. Very reliable and work's every time without the hassle of answering questions like this. Would be nice if it worked in real life because, while rarely required, fuel cell maintenance can be a pain in the @ss.
@r01d2
@r01d2 4 жыл бұрын
since they have Arc Reactor, they say it's like a nuclear reactor but AA-size, maybe that's the "cheat device" we don't have
@alderwolf7687
@alderwolf7687 4 жыл бұрын
@@Laputsky That would be a good guess but engines are thirsty things and that storage would probably be insufficient for anything more than 30 to 45 minutes flight time unless you actively attempt to conserved fuel which they don't in the films.
@macgyveratlarge2133
@macgyveratlarge2133 4 жыл бұрын
Seems that the wing roots are plenty large enough for at least 7000 lbs of fuel, and possibly more space for fuel around the fuselage. Drop tanks would be a great addition , but I never saw any.
@mikiroony
@mikiroony 4 жыл бұрын
"While the Quinjet may struggle a superhuman riding a Harley". Best burn of the video :D
@pyeitme508
@pyeitme508 4 жыл бұрын
It is LOL! 😂
@tjpprojects7192
@tjpprojects7192 4 жыл бұрын
struggle "against" a superhuman
@r01d2
@r01d2 4 жыл бұрын
I still liking the Quinjet 2012 more than AOU Quinjet, because AOU Quinjet design-wise looks like a generic sci-fi ship and Quinjet 2012 is more tacticool
@juancruzmarolda7726
@juancruzmarolda7726 4 жыл бұрын
I completely agree, the original quinjet feels more real or possible
@TheTattorack
@TheTattorack 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, well, that's what you get when you let Stark design all your shit.
@simpleisbetter4132
@simpleisbetter4132 4 жыл бұрын
They should have built another "Bus".
@lukecody3785
@lukecody3785 3 жыл бұрын
@@simpleisbetter4132 too bad it was used as a decoy and shot down in season 3
@JonatasAdoM
@JonatasAdoM 3 жыл бұрын
That's the MCU in a nutshell. Started boots on reality, trying to make sense and now you have nanobots making everything shrink and reform by magic. In a way it reminds me of Xcom designs. The first reboot made a lot of sense, while the sequel feels like a it tales place in the Marvel universe.
@hudson_powell
@hudson_powell 4 жыл бұрын
Do the Zephyr One from Agents of SHIELD!
@thayerfogerson2186
@thayerfogerson2186 4 жыл бұрын
Yes pls
@luisacuna8315
@luisacuna8315 4 жыл бұрын
A must!
@noobmaster6ix9
@noobmaster6ix9 4 жыл бұрын
and the bus!
@dreadwing01
@dreadwing01 4 жыл бұрын
Ryan Cobalt thank you for reading my mind.
@nesoprimus930
@nesoprimus930 4 жыл бұрын
Yes Please do the zephyr one from agents of shield
@LordBloodraven
@LordBloodraven 4 жыл бұрын
F-35: "Cheaper than the Quinjet and could be used for interception and air-to-air combat." Not very effective against a giant green rage monster.
@0623kaboom
@0623kaboom 4 жыл бұрын
major fall back of the f35 ... single engine .. no modern fighter goes that route for lack of redundancy and staying power in the action ... the f35 takes engine damage it has to leave .. anything else can stay a bit longer ... the f35 is nothing but a test bed for other technology now and not worth it's weight in the hype it has been given ... it has more troubles than boat with a mesh screen hull ...
@LordBloodraven
@LordBloodraven 4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Okay, there's a lot to unpack here. First, there are still *modern*, single-engine jet fighters like General Dynamic's F-16, the Mitsubishi F-2, and the Mirage 2000, all of which are still in active service. Second, even losing one engine on a twin-engine jet fighter is disastrous. The loss of thrust combined with drag makes even the most basic combat maneuvers liable to tear the airframe apart. (Yeah, TopGun was full of bullshit.) Third, the F-35's various technologies have already been implemented before in other aircraft. The stealth technology on an aerodynamic frame was proven with the F-22, the internal rotary missile launchers has been around since the F-117, and the VTOL technology successfully debuted with the Harrier. The novelty of the F-35 is that they have *Assembled* it all together in a single craft. Lastly, a better insult would have been "Screen door on a submarine."
@schrombomb
@schrombomb 4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom single engine isn't a problem for an aircraft that can stay hidden and engage at the distance it can. not to mention the crazy networking between them basically giving fully automated sitrep for hundreds of miles around a target/battle and feeds it to all the commanders around. people that fly them have changed their tune quite a bit over the past few years.
@ranwolf7650
@ranwolf7650 4 жыл бұрын
not many things are
@m1a1abramstank49
@m1a1abramstank49 4 жыл бұрын
0623kaboom Uhh, JAS 39, Rafale, F-21, that sounds bullshit honestly. And how is it supposed to take damage if it can’t even be spotted? And I’d it is hit let’s say on a 2 engine aircraft, wouldn’t that still be an immediate RTB sign? Too bad it does great in NATO exercises and performs like a good dogfighter
@Colonel_Overkill
@Colonel_Overkill 4 жыл бұрын
The F-35 used by SHIELD is even so amazing that it can fire autocannon shells out of the jet air intake vents instead of the actual gun port or cannon hardpoints....
@uk1644
@uk1644 3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@boymahina123
@boymahina123 3 жыл бұрын
Not to mention all VTOL attack/fighter aircraft have weapons disabled in VTOL mode for safety reasons.
@Utubesuperstar
@Utubesuperstar 3 жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 yeah they took a direct page from that shitty diehard movie that did it even worse
@flawer1316
@flawer1316 2 жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 Battlefield 4
@bagenius5970
@bagenius5970 Жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 I would assume that S.H.I.E.L.D.'s F-35s are modified to suit their needs. They are an extra-governmental organization, not a branch of the military. They pretty much operate in their own set of rules and regulations, so they can do this if they want/need to.
@zenkaiangel977
@zenkaiangel977 4 жыл бұрын
9:20 having to be able to successfully crash land as part of the test to get your license is actually pretty badass 🐅
@gateauxq4604
@gateauxq4604 3 жыл бұрын
That was amazing and terrifying to watch. Doing that in a combat situation would definitely warrant a medal! I wonder if Senator Duckworth got one. She kind of did land like that with the minor inconvenience of having had a missile fired through the ship.
@guts-141
@guts-141 Жыл бұрын
A game that rewards an achievement for having a safe crash landing for a helicopter that I know of was Rising Storm 2 Vietnam
@NateSceneTV
@NateSceneTV 4 жыл бұрын
The Quin Jet sees a ton of action in Agents of Shield. Super underrated sci-fi show. They also feature a ship called The Zephyr, which is basically a Quin Jet mother-ship and areal command center as well as starship Edit: Glad it got featured in the video!
@dannyr2976
@dannyr2976 4 жыл бұрын
Super underrated show, indeed (didn't care for season 6 personally) but the level of visual effects on a TV budget is astonding!
@ShadeSlayer1911
@ShadeSlayer1911 4 жыл бұрын
Too bad it became The Daisy Show as the seasons went on.
@dannyr2976
@dannyr2976 4 жыл бұрын
@@ShadeSlayer1911 For me, the 'Framework' episodes were shear perfection!
@NateSceneTV
@NateSceneTV 4 жыл бұрын
@@dannyr2976 Radcliff's death was poetry
@kephessthedying5942
@kephessthedying5942 4 жыл бұрын
Time travel ship:)
@ronniehopper2726
@ronniehopper2726 4 жыл бұрын
Jets and planes cut through the air helicopters on the other hand just beat it into submission
@backdraft916
@backdraft916 4 жыл бұрын
Ronnie Hopper THAT’S the comment I was looking for!!
@0623kaboom
@0623kaboom 4 жыл бұрын
well actually jet planes get sucked through the air actually ... the high speed air over the top of the wing creates a vaccuum causing lift so essentially a plane gets sucked into the air ... . helicopters are like lazy women who dont do anything ... the man does all the work (the rotor) while the rest just sits there and goes along for the ride ...
@SamvedIyer
@SamvedIyer 3 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Feminists incoming in 3,2,1......
@biblebot3947
@biblebot3947 3 жыл бұрын
@@SamvedIyer not misogynists coming in 3...2.....1.......
@mikewaterfield3599
@mikewaterfield3599 3 жыл бұрын
they do not cut, they soar, A helo is nothing more than a conglomeration of moving parts desperate to get away from each other held aloft by the third axiom of the aviator. "in thrust we trust"
@sigmar2331
@sigmar2331 4 жыл бұрын
A F-35 flying troop transport with cloaking tech
@somebody7205
@somebody7205 4 жыл бұрын
What's better than that
@newsaxonyproductions7871
@newsaxonyproductions7871 4 жыл бұрын
Alan's breakdown of the Quinjet makes it sound like, at least to me, the galaxy-class starship from Star Trek. The way it uses power and thrust instead of aerodynamics seems very similar. I think Generation Films should do a video about the Lions from Voltron: Legendary Defender. I want to see what scientific explanations Alan can come up with.
@0623kaboom
@0623kaboom 4 жыл бұрын
just with 4 more engines that actually work as intended unlike the single engine f35 jet test bed .... as of now it isnt good for anything else
@newsaxonyproductions7871
@newsaxonyproductions7871 4 жыл бұрын
*aerodynamics to move is *Galaxy-class starship
@m0hamed_kamz70
@m0hamed_kamz70 4 жыл бұрын
...which is also a spaceship and a submarine...wth🤯
@morlath4767
@morlath4767 4 жыл бұрын
You missed the "and Air to Hulk combat" quip when using the scene from Avengers of Hulk jumping at the plane. I love these videos and please keep them coming!
@robstone4537
@robstone4537 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah that scene where an F35 has muzzle flashes from both sides when an F35 only has a single cannon on the leftside. And the Vtol version shown does not even have an internal gun, it has an external gun pod.
@miles2378
@miles2378 4 жыл бұрын
@@robstone4537 and the CG model was not even corect.
@0623kaboom
@0623kaboom 4 жыл бұрын
@@robstone4537 yeah and people think that single engine plane is good .. it can hover in one setup but not fly fast with it optiomized for hover .. and cant hover when optomized for flight .. and cant be optomized in real time ... it requires ground work to do it ... the f35 is just a flying test bed ... it stopped being a viable fighter as soon as it had to be hard reset to use either flight mode
@davidshanley558
@davidshanley558 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you mentioned the broken wing award, we had two apache pilots in my unit get these. It was great they survived.
@simpleisbetter4132
@simpleisbetter4132 4 жыл бұрын
Honestly, that is great thing. It's tough enough losing buddies. Besides there are no posthumous Broken Wing awards.
@L0stEngineer
@L0stEngineer 4 жыл бұрын
As an aerospace engineer, I have to unfortunately inform you that the quinjet is a physical impossibly. There is no metal on Earth that has that stiffness, yield strength and lightness known to man. There is also no fuel, short of an unshielded compact nuclear reactor, with that much power density to be able to boost that heavy craft into space. It just can't exist. However, if Congress is willing to authorize a multibillion dollar development contract, my company will be happy to spend it for you.
@danamoore1788
@danamoore1788 4 жыл бұрын
Pardon a moment. But this universe has people like Tony Stark who make flying suits of armour that can take tank rounds. And this was him borrowing the metallurgy from a satellite project as I recall. So stiff yet light weight seems to be there. Shield also seems unimpressed with the miniature arc reactor. As though they already had one. So perhaps they are at least partially powered in this manner? They really don't get into the nuts a bolts of how it works.
@georgedang449
@georgedang449 4 жыл бұрын
These superhero flicks are for people who don't think about things, not for you. You should watch The Expanse.
@martinhanke1670
@martinhanke1670 4 жыл бұрын
it's comics, so relax.
@fred6319
@fred6319 4 жыл бұрын
@@georgedang449 except the decks from the Roci don't match the exterior
@rickyheath7607
@rickyheath7607 4 жыл бұрын
*sniff* *sniff* Grumman is that you?
@weskersification
@weskersification 3 жыл бұрын
"The helicopter Is a flying brick"
@carlbruschnigjr1757
@carlbruschnigjr1757 3 жыл бұрын
As a friend of mine put it, "A weird collection of aviation parts loosely traveling in the same general direction." He was a helicopter design engineer.
@ky1ebetts
@ky1ebetts 3 жыл бұрын
So would a 747 be a cinder-block?
@spontaneouslord3756
@spontaneouslord3756 4 жыл бұрын
01:55 Man, I didn't realize that it was an old model of Quinjet before watching this video.
@barbar3021
@barbar3021 4 жыл бұрын
I was expecting more of an indept analysis of the aircraft design. Ehehe
@Frost-01
@Frost-01 4 жыл бұрын
i just noticed in every movie they always portray the fighter jets as having dual guns when they actually dont and only have 1 gun
@johnverick-smith9794
@johnverick-smith9794 4 жыл бұрын
The placement is also very wrong. They would never put a weapon system in the engine intakes. That's a lot of work to make that work.
@tntproductions1996
@tntproductions1996 4 жыл бұрын
@@johnverick-smith9794 I'm assuming the varient in the movie is an F-35B, so no internal cannons. While the F-35B can mount a gun pod, it still does not have an internal cannon. Only the A varient can mount an internal cannon.
@Knightfang1
@Knightfang1 4 жыл бұрын
TnT Productions right? I can’t believe so many people miss this fact. The F-35A has a 25mm cannon above its right wing root. The B and C models carry a 25mm cannon in an external gun pod mounted under the fuselage. However the Airforce has been having problems with the internal cannon on the F-35. It’s accuracy is questionable and it’s been cracking it’s mounting brackets
@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM
@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM 4 жыл бұрын
Also every fighter jet, for some reason, needs be shown, with its afterburner engaged.
@SodaPopin5ki
@SodaPopin5ki 4 жыл бұрын
And you never see aelerons or elevators move.
@barrybend7189
@barrybend7189 4 жыл бұрын
The quinjet is ok but the Pelican from Halo is better.
@Blue-Gold_Crusader
@Blue-Gold_Crusader 4 жыл бұрын
The question that I'd like answered is: would both of them actually be able to fly in atmosphere? I'd love to see a wind tunnel test (among others) on both vehicles to determine whether or not both designs could even work in atmo.
@johnverick-smith9794
@johnverick-smith9794 4 жыл бұрын
@@Blue-Gold_Crusader Quinjet maybe Pelican definitely not. The wings are too short to provide lift instead it has downward facing VTOL thrusters and the rear dual thrusters can swivel/vector to provide further lift and control. Watch the Installation 00 pelican breakdown for more information.
@generaljimmies3429
@generaljimmies3429 4 жыл бұрын
Does the Arwing(Arrow Wing)design from Star Fox make sense? Mk1 Arwing(SNES Star Fox) Mk2 Arwing(Star Fox 64) Mk2 Arwing Zero(Star Fox Zero), this includes the Black Armor variant(More firepower but less shield strength) Mk3 Arwing(Star Fox Assault)
@colekenney2965
@colekenney2965 4 жыл бұрын
@@johnverick-smith9794 I heard the first models of the pelican (the bungie series) actually could work aerodynamically. Its body as a whole generated lift when in flight while the vtol jets were for hovering and low speed maneuvers. The problem is we dont actually have a fuel that would work. Or engines probably. But that's sci-fi stuff anyway. I'm more interested in the aerodynamics actually working because sci-fi can wave fingers and say 500 years of better rocketry.
@ln7929
@ln7929 3 жыл бұрын
@@colekenney2965 I think most of the unsc vehicles in halo use cold fusion engines
@petersmythe6462
@petersmythe6462 4 жыл бұрын
Ok, some problems I notice: 1. First and foremost: 3 reasonably sized afterburning turbofans or even turboramjets would have considerable difficulty getting it to its stated airbreathing top speed of mach 2.1. The airframe doesn't appear to follow the Whitcomb area rule well at all and is pretty chubby. So at sea level it might not even break mach 1. 2. It is very clearly designed for high alpha maneuvers, with high lift devices on the relatively deep wings and canted vertical stabilizers. However, this requires that it be at low dynamic pressure to not rip the wings or kill the crew. Having the jets sitting above the fuselage like that, will make force to slam it forward. Maybe even tumble it headfirst into the ground if it stalls. I seriously wonder why the engine are not sitting to the sides. 4. The intake design is highly questionable during high alpha maneuvers. This is especially important because if an engine suddenly chokes and stalls from the drop in air pressure, the aircraft may leave the envelope of controlled flight as the pitchdown moment from the engine ceases and so does the vertical thrust. Even if it has thrust vector control, it may not actually have the power to regain control in a timely manner after a compressor stall. 5. Considering how it might be prone to going into a deep stall, the aircraft looks to have a lot of angular inertia in yaw. The wideset engines, huge wings, and turbofans (but really more like ducted turboprops) in the wings lend themselves to making it harder to escape a flat spin. And the anhedral on the wings doesn't help, although their being high on the fuselage does. 6. Obviously this thing is not designed as an SSTO or a submersible aircraft and wouldn't function as one without applying a healthy dose of ultra-futuristic magitech.
@simpleisbetter4132
@simpleisbetter4132 4 жыл бұрын
"Magitech" - says it all beautifully.
@tlshortyshorty5810
@tlshortyshorty5810 3 жыл бұрын
I'm pinning this. Great analysis.
@Empiro3
@Empiro3 4 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet has 5 engines -- you mentioned the 2 jet engines, and 2 VTOL engines. It also has 1 linear areospike rocket engine that I think you only see in the AOS series to take it into space.
@SodaPopin5ki
@SodaPopin5ki 4 жыл бұрын
I built an SSTO in KSP with 2 Whiplash jets, 2 Thuds for above 20 km, and 1 NERV for space. I should call that a Quinjet.
@chord_0121
@chord_0121 3 жыл бұрын
"Helicopters are flying bricks"
@lynchkid003
@lynchkid003 4 жыл бұрын
Something I don't like about the Quinjet is the articulating cockpit design... Adds a failure point
@eriktrimble8784
@eriktrimble8784 4 жыл бұрын
Not to mention huge weight.
@joelellis7035
@joelellis7035 4 жыл бұрын
Also some really funky aerodynamics as well as just unnecessary complexity.
@bradz76
@bradz76 3 жыл бұрын
Shit its a movie
@marsrocket
@marsrocket 4 жыл бұрын
Tony can survive literally falling out of the sky in the Iron Man suit; I doubt a bit of maneuvering would cause someone in that world to black out. The must have some kind of inertial dampers.
@ky1ebetts
@ky1ebetts 3 жыл бұрын
Hey as long as they keep the blinker fluid topped off, they should be fine.
@glitterboy2098
@glitterboy2098 4 жыл бұрын
This video would have been a bit better if you'd focused on one specific line of quinjets (the SHIELD/Hydra type seen in the first avengers film,, civil war, and the agents of shield series) and then examined the larger Stark built Avengers version seen in later films as a separate entity. which is very clearly is, being of a different size, design, and performance.
@RameesMuhammedMK
@RameesMuhammedMK 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah - he generalized everything. The Stark quinjet is single piloted and uses repulsors for VTOL where the SHEILD version has two pilots and uses ducted fans for VTOL, later upgraded with scramjet engines for the thrust
@QuantumAscension1
@QuantumAscension1 4 жыл бұрын
It appears the Quinjet also uses a hybrid lifting-body design, which would better explain its bulky fuselage.
@JustMeESM
@JustMeESM 3 жыл бұрын
The quinjets design in Age of Ultron is different, right? It seemed so much advanced and more badass
@Raist474
@Raist474 4 жыл бұрын
I think the Gau-17 sounding like a single-barrel vickers machine gun was the most rage-inducing facet of this aircraft. Marvel can't handle the BRRRRR!
@jeffjohnson1966
@jeffjohnson1966 4 жыл бұрын
Great video! I respect the amount of research you put into these videos! The details do not go unnoticed!
@TheSp0kesman
@TheSp0kesman 4 жыл бұрын
I personally think someone got the idea from the Skyranger from the Xcom series. At least the idea for a jet/VTOL vehicle capable of depositing a squad for operations wherever it's needed. Something about the idea is just so badass. having looked at some pictures, I'm now much more sure it was at least part of the inspiration. The Skyranger from Enemy Unknown has the same two turbofans in the wings and general bulkiness. Though they definitely made their own unique model that is probably more realistic.
@mocoj7423
@mocoj7423 4 жыл бұрын
Both were likely inspired by the V-22 Osprey
@MrRevan991
@MrRevan991 3 жыл бұрын
@@mocoj7423the quinjet appears in the comic's as far back as 1969 avengers #61
@stratometal
@stratometal 4 жыл бұрын
Do the Milano next!
@ky1ebetts
@ky1ebetts 3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Cap could take the Milano down like he took out the Quinjet by bouncing his shield off of it twice.
@Khanclansith
@Khanclansith 4 жыл бұрын
Are you going to do the MIG Firefox from the Clint Eastwood movie of the same name
@Blackcloud_Garage
@Blackcloud_Garage 4 жыл бұрын
I’ve been waiting for this exact video but discussing the troop transport helicopter (not the gunships) from Pandora.
@tjh44961
@tjh44961 4 жыл бұрын
I know that several folks have built scale models of the Pandora craft, but they make use of quad rotor tech, the wings don't provide much, if any, lift.
@paogene1288
@paogene1288 3 жыл бұрын
@@tjh44961 I genuinely believe that those are contra rotating rotors.
@worldsedge4991
@worldsedge4991 3 жыл бұрын
My interpretation of the downward flex of the wings upon landing is that it's done to enhance ground effect. It captures the high pressure air underneath that is produced by those rotors and the high attack forward movement, making a cushion underneath.
@corporategunner5972
@corporategunner5972 4 жыл бұрын
Please make a video about the breakdown on the Zeon Mobile Suits
@maverickso8397
@maverickso8397 4 жыл бұрын
And the original Gundam
@arielalexandroarnaldo2238
@arielalexandroarnaldo2238 3 жыл бұрын
@@maverickso8397 The video should also make references to the 2018 movie Ready Player One that featured robots sponsored by Bandai such as Voltron, Gundam, and Mechagodzilla
@jackcooper7727
@jackcooper7727 4 жыл бұрын
Oh yea its da thicc boi
@voodoo0112
@voodoo0112 4 жыл бұрын
Titans are the real thicc boys
@krisknudsen2483
@krisknudsen2483 3 жыл бұрын
Great breakdown man... very well done!
@MonkeyJedi99
@MonkeyJedi99 4 жыл бұрын
IIRC, the quadjet was not VTOL, it was STOSL (Short Take-Off, Short-Landing). And somehow made space-worthy by Director Krennik.
@phydeux
@phydeux 3 жыл бұрын
Somehow = Lots of caulking.
@galiathen
@galiathen 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video and you guys are awesome
@40grand66
@40grand66 3 жыл бұрын
The interesting part is that he goes back and forth between versions of the Quinjet to support his argument which makes it an unreliable argument. If you go back and forth between two versions of something which a massive amount of changes take place from V1 to V2.
@Valandar2
@Valandar2 4 жыл бұрын
Compare it to the OG comic book Quinjets... those things were literally flying bricks. :D
@steelgreyed
@steelgreyed 3 жыл бұрын
The single funniest thing I've witnessed in this life is watching Ghost in the Shell in 1995, and then watching the USMC adopt pretty much EVERYTHING that flew in that movie as their standard infantry deployment tech in the 2010's.
@KC_Smooth
@KC_Smooth 4 жыл бұрын
Cool video, but I was hoping for an answer as to how viable it’s design from a real world perspective. Maybe we’ll see one in the future?
@sohanprasad8989
@sohanprasad8989 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation
@caradellinowazer2988
@caradellinowazer2988 4 жыл бұрын
Great vid, but I have my doubts on the auto rotation theory. You would need more diameter to keep up rotational speed and the aerodynamical layout to support reversed airflow (as a helicopter has). Imho power off landings rely on gliding principle. But the most important feature: it looks cool and they do a lot to sell it as possibly working 😉
@robstone4537
@robstone4537 4 жыл бұрын
I agree, a helicopter has long wide rotors with plenty of surface area so they rotate quite slowly. The Quinjet has many small rotors blades in a housing, more like a ducted turbofan producing thrust than a rotor generating lift. They would need to be spinning at high speed to generate lift.
@Vinnocentus
@Vinnocentus 4 жыл бұрын
Wasnt it in space at some point? I dont think that makes sense lol. I take back what I said lol
@r01d2
@r01d2 4 жыл бұрын
you know, in Ragnarok, Thor's first plan was to use Avengers Quinjet to enter "Devil Anals" before abort the plan, either Thor just jump the gun or he know their Quinjet capable doing that
@manuelcjr52
@manuelcjr52 4 жыл бұрын
There are vacuum capable variants
@MonkeyJedi99
@MonkeyJedi99 4 жыл бұрын
In Agents of Shield, they took one orbital to trap an alien organism and blow it up. (Plus a former Hydra agent and a shield agent)
@simpleisbetter4132
@simpleisbetter4132 4 жыл бұрын
@@MonkeyJedi99 That's right, good call. It couldn't maneuver in space.
@ev01ve14
@ev01ve14 3 жыл бұрын
It could be used to shuttle around soldiers, but not very well in battle, seeing how venerable the propellers were, and how of one went down, the ship goes down
@WAVEFUNCTION_TV
@WAVEFUNCTION_TV 3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting about planes only taking off at night in Dubai. I never knew such a thing was the case 😳
@darkheartlost5826
@darkheartlost5826 3 ай бұрын
You guys really truly need to do a breakdown of the Zephyr One from Agents of Shield
@stillunsure7630
@stillunsure7630 4 жыл бұрын
Hi guys, Wondered if you'd do alternative scifi wargaming reviews? Void 1.1's game "Age of Tyrants" 6mm wargame really interests me and love your review of the fighting strengths and armoured vehicles?
@kempmt1
@kempmt1 4 жыл бұрын
I seriously like to see us make something similar, for it will be better than anything we currently have,
@biggles258
@biggles258 3 жыл бұрын
At about 8:00: I'd never even heard of plans having difficulty taking off in hot environments. Just goes to show - you live and learn
@henryd.4802
@henryd.4802 3 жыл бұрын
Jet engines also need colder air to work well, that's why the Harrier had an issue with sucking in it's own hot air and suddenly losing lift. the experimental Boeing X-32 had a cold air nozzle to act as a screen to push hot air from it's jets away from the intake.
@user-gd4be2wk5c
@user-gd4be2wk5c 2 жыл бұрын
설명감사합니다. 담아갈게요:)
@OllamhDrab
@OllamhDrab 4 жыл бұрын
Sci-fi spaceship to actually *want* is always the *van* spaceship. Topic to treat and discuss. :)
@Connor.SG-1Ring
@Connor.SG-1Ring 3 жыл бұрын
The MCU has a lot of plot holes, one in particular I have issues with is back when Fury said that S.H.I.E.L.D started researching and developing weapons using the Tesseract, because of what happened in _Thor (2011)._ However, it's now been established in _Captain Marvel (2019)_ that S.H.I.E.L.D (Fury in particular) had already been aware of the existence of hostile alien forces since back in the 90's. Meaning that S.H.I.E.L.D already had the means and reason to start making Tesseract based weaponry. Thus by the time _Thor (2011)_ or _Avengers (2012)_ rolled in, S.H.I.E.L.D would've already had an arsenal such weapons. Alternatively, Thanos would've also learned the location of the Tesseract and Earth much earlier.
@HellFireAlliance
@HellFireAlliance 4 жыл бұрын
As a stand alone transport it'd be faster than a helicopter while maintaining the VTOL of the helicopter. If we could actually make some, IRL, it would be awesome. Just wish there was a decent/available model kit for the quintet
@yonasnegash3282
@yonasnegash3282 4 жыл бұрын
Great video. Can you to a video about the High Guard Force Lance from Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda. It's like the Quinjet of melee weapons.
@ramokhan
@ramokhan 4 жыл бұрын
so hope that mean we can have a video in future about agents of s.h.i.e.l.d. zephyr one
@dongadson1099
@dongadson1099 4 жыл бұрын
It's the same thing and setup as Foehammer's UNSC Pelican. Now, she delivers!!! R.I.P
@flankerchan
@flankerchan 3 жыл бұрын
My greatest complaint on Quinjet in technical term are its Wing mounted fan. It consumes so much volume, down to the point of questionable amount of fuel volume it can carry.
@edwardbryan9501
@edwardbryan9501 4 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet is cool to me. But I’m waiting for Tony Stark to add his Ark Reactor for a major power upgrade or add Vibranium armor like Captain America.
@alexojeda9048
@alexojeda9048 4 жыл бұрын
Weeeell, you're going to be waiting awhile for the simple fact that Tony's DEEEAAAD!!!
@Snapper314
@Snapper314 3 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet is NOT just a Combat aircraft. It is a multirole aircraft that serves many roles.
@seanwheeler3116
@seanwheeler3116 3 жыл бұрын
One point about the Harrier in the Falklands is no of them were lost in air to air combat. Ground fire and faults / accidents only.
@krishsane2014
@krishsane2014 3 жыл бұрын
According to agents of shield s7, quinjets exhibit 63000 pound force of thirst per turbine (not the vtol one). This is extremely powerful for its size and shows that shield rotors are very powerful.
@SuperSaiyen64
@SuperSaiyen64 4 жыл бұрын
I got the Lego quinjet it's a really good set. Highly recommend during these quarentine days
@simpleisbetter4132
@simpleisbetter4132 4 жыл бұрын
Makes sense. It should look pretty close. The Quinjet already looks like a Minecraft airframe.
@BourneCreations
@BourneCreations 4 жыл бұрын
Good video; how would you compare the Quinjet to BSG's Raptors?
@viktorbihar5384
@viktorbihar5384 3 жыл бұрын
Whatever it is with your voice, I like it👌
@ky1ebetts
@ky1ebetts 3 жыл бұрын
Cap took down the mighty quinjet like it was nothing, literally by vaguely bouncing his shield off of it twice.
@skizzik121
@skizzik121 3 жыл бұрын
QuadJet reminds me of more than a little bit of the Pelican from the HALO series
@breadw7490
@breadw7490 4 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, auto rotation depends on changing the pitch of the rotors of a helicopter, but can the quintet change the pitch of the rotors on its turbo fans though🤔
@alexmandin6279
@alexmandin6279 4 жыл бұрын
The shield Quinjet is similar and looks like the UNSC pelican drop ship since I know you guys talk about halo lore sometimes you should do one talking about the pelican drop ship compared to the gunship that I get the fly in halo 4 and how it was more improved
@ascherlafayette8572
@ascherlafayette8572 3 жыл бұрын
2 things 1 is that while autorotations are an emergency procedure, they are in no way a crash landing. It's basically the equivalent of gliding a plane. Pilots practice them regularly and are very comfortable with the maneuver. I've ridden with a pilot on a practice autorotation it was not violent or terrifying. 2 I doubt the quintet can auto rotate as it has very small rotors and it is unlikely they are controlled through pitch adjustment. Also it has wings
@indianajones4321
@indianajones4321 4 жыл бұрын
You should review the show Spaceforce
@GenerationFilms
@GenerationFilms 4 жыл бұрын
Love it
@pyeitme508
@pyeitme508 4 жыл бұрын
@@GenerationFilms ya better!
@PGGraham
@PGGraham 4 жыл бұрын
As a real Engineer doing real space exploration equipment, and simulation habitats, I hated it. Much of the fun stuff is fun, but the stuff they get wrong is so wrong it hurt too much to like the rest ..
@generaljimmies3429
@generaljimmies3429 4 жыл бұрын
Does the Arwing(Arrow Wing)design from Star Fox make sense? Mk1 Arwing(SNES Star Fox) Mk2 Arwing(Star Fox 64) Mk2 Arwing Zero(Star Fox Zero), this includes the Black Armor variant(More firepower but less shield strength) Mk3 Arwing(Star Fox Assault)
@evanrideout3919
@evanrideout3919 4 жыл бұрын
For most the questions I see in the comments, people should really check out Agents of Shield. The show is awesome and goes more in-depth with the technical stuff in the MCU. Albeit, the show won't answer all of the questions.
@dixievfd55
@dixievfd55 4 жыл бұрын
Nice mention of the vortex ring effect. That is death for a helicopter at low altitude.
@contessa.adella
@contessa.adella 3 жыл бұрын
Anything will fly, given enough thrust....but that is the show stopper with these cartoon craft. They somehow develop ten times the thrust you could really expect from that much engine space in the airframe...and at the same time have ten times the fuel range. Getting into space needs a separate oxidant for the fuel...where is that stored then? I love how they are made to look plausible tho’ just don’t ask difficult questions huh!
@nickwhite2582
@nickwhite2582 3 жыл бұрын
So, basically a Pelican from Halo? Then again, the Pelican explains why it has almost no fuel storage.(hint, it's fusion rockets)
@dannyr2976
@dannyr2976 4 жыл бұрын
Make a quinjet supersonic, we have ourselves a new Airwolf!
@0623kaboom
@0623kaboom 4 жыл бұрын
we did we called it the avro arrow ... 70 years ago ... ok it wasnt vstol ... the rest was there then ... and still hasnt been matched to date. thats right the arrow's design specification that is was made to meet has not been met by modern jets like the f35, f22, f18 and even the f15 ... and all their variants ... . and the arrow was designed in the late 50's ... thats 70 years and no one has made a plane that matches what the arrow was designed to beat
@dannyr2976
@dannyr2976 4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Thanks, I know little about this plane other than it was Canadian, and way, waaay ahead it's time. There was a video somewhere that speculated how fare against the F-35 in terms of cost and tehnology if released now.
@xisburnttoast5372
@xisburnttoast5372 3 жыл бұрын
now for the Zephyr in Agents of SHEILD
@mariebcfhs9491
@mariebcfhs9491 3 жыл бұрын
it has the aerodynamics of a flying brick
@ethanspaziani5269
@ethanspaziani5269 3 жыл бұрын
Hey hey don't know if this message will get read by you but it's worth a try you should look at the movie stealth and the aircraft in it I really love that movie and it helps send me towards the path that I am on today! Im an aircraft enthusiasts and those designs always will have a special place
@robertphillips6296
@robertphillips6296 3 жыл бұрын
Have you done one on the Valkyrie?
@kuyachamp7618
@kuyachamp7618 3 жыл бұрын
Quinjets looks like a stingray wearing metal armor and has no tail.
@enhanceddeath
@enhanceddeath 4 жыл бұрын
You should break down the practicality of the UNSC Falcon compared to either the little bird or the Huey.
@tolvaer
@tolvaer 3 жыл бұрын
as sci fi becomes fact, it is telling that there are similarities that are blatant precursors to what we may see; "what will the Simpsons and DARPA dream up next?". My personal favorite are Halo's Pelicans and Falcons, Long sword and sabres look very familiar too.
@airlemental
@airlemental 3 жыл бұрын
I have to admit, the first time I saw a quinjet on film, my first thought was "wow, some movie people that actually created something that felt like it could be real, I love it!". Not quite as much as I like the Battlestar Galactica Raptor, but I would still take it as my second choice. Less cargo space in the Raptor, but FTL!! ^.^
@bruneauandreas564
@bruneauandreas564 3 жыл бұрын
This story about Dubai is so true that the controllers in Dubai actually lie about the OAT, 56 C being the max limit for most Emirates operated aircrafts, you can hear during summer all day long in the ATIS OAT 56 C ;)
@sohanprasad8989
@sohanprasad8989 2 жыл бұрын
Nice
@TgamerBio5529
@TgamerBio5529 4 жыл бұрын
It was very good for transporting troops or supplies from space to atmosphere and also they could of just research military space ships
@colbysteffens2976
@colbysteffens2976 3 жыл бұрын
I love the quinjet its the one of the best vehicles in the mcu
@Sam-iw6te
@Sam-iw6te 4 жыл бұрын
How about the HALO Pelican, SHIELD Quinjet and LAAT face off?
@LeeCarlson
@LeeCarlson 4 жыл бұрын
My only quibble is that you never answer the question posed by this episode's title. Does the quinjet design make sense?
@barghestblue731
@barghestblue731 4 жыл бұрын
It really doesnt
@ile2038
@ile2038 4 жыл бұрын
In certain aspects this aircraft makes 100% and i love to see it in real life cause with our current technology we may be able to make something like this but only for troop carrying and ground support
@abyssstrider2547
@abyssstrider2547 4 жыл бұрын
Its Renounce not renouce
@ile2038
@ile2038 4 жыл бұрын
@@abyssstrider2547 ik I've tried to change it 400x but KZfaq says no.....well actually i have whenever i click on it myself I see it changed but when i click off it's not changed
@prometheus8010
@prometheus8010 Жыл бұрын
Could fill alot of roles military uses multiple different aircraft for
@Confirmed_Felon
@Confirmed_Felon Жыл бұрын
the turbo fans work by using spinning geras kinda like lego but that the bigger gear is the fan and smaller gears are the one that spin the fan
@eramires
@eramires 3 жыл бұрын
Its a beautiful birdie :D
@skizzik121
@skizzik121 3 жыл бұрын
can you even reference the price of Quinjet in a universe with the Helicarriers or Iron Mans suit?
@jonbar3842
@jonbar3842 4 жыл бұрын
As a student helicopter pilot the only thing you got right about helicopters is the auto rotation part. That's not how seal team six crashed and they are not like flying bricks they can glide. Not very well but if you couldn't glide you wouldnt be able to auto rotate.
@markcastonguay7906
@markcastonguay7906 4 жыл бұрын
the problem with the hulk and "F-35B" scene is that it isn't really an F-35. first, none of the three versions has two cannons and second, the B version doesn't have an internal cannon it can only mount a pod mounted gun as the needed lift motor takes up to much space to allow a cannon mounted internally.
@madkabal
@madkabal 4 жыл бұрын
It was the F-35 "D" ...... idk lol :)
@tomastomasi975
@tomastomasi975 4 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Did you know your hat was swinted the whole time though?
@AUS5113
@AUS5113 4 жыл бұрын
I love the quinn jet. It is awesome. To bad it is only in the movies. I would love to see it in real life but like the guy below said where will you store the fuel? Unless it is so far advanced that it runs on alternative energy source not using liquid fuel.
@guts-141
@guts-141 Жыл бұрын
Certainly wish we got Arc Reactor all over the world
Top 10 Ships For Evacuating Humanity From Earth
14:27
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 100 М.
How the French built the fastest plane in the world... Nord Griffon 1500
12:58
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 437 М.
That's how money comes into our family
00:14
Mamasoboliha
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
孩子多的烦恼?#火影忍者 #家庭 #佐助
00:31
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 49 МЛН
3M❤️ #thankyou #shorts
00:16
ウエスP -Mr Uekusa- Wes-P
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Why The SU57 'Felon' Sucks
13:41
Kaboda
Рет қаралды 888 М.
Avatar: RDA Gunships (Scorpion & Dragon) | Aircraft Breakdown
8:36
Four Most INTENSE Super Soldier Transformations
13:22
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 192 М.
5 DEADLIEST Starship in Science Fiction
14:45
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 408 М.
Why the Chinese Stealth J-20 might be not what you think
10:35
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
All 25 TERMINATOR Models Explained
14:24
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 903 М.
7 Most Powerful ELDER RACES in Science Fiction
15:37
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 696 М.
Agents of SHIELD: The Bus Analysis
6:55
hoojiwana
Рет қаралды 729 М.
THE ROCINANTE: All Features Explained | The Expanse Ships
15:38
Generation Films
Рет қаралды 213 М.
Real FLYING avengers Quinjet RC airplane
13:01
PeterSripol
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
Зарядил патрон гвоздями как в фильме «БРАТ»
1:00
Оружейный Барон - Top Hunter -
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Вот как нужно танцевать😁
0:15
Айваз Идиатуллин
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Оказался НЕНУЖНЫМ и Его БРОСИЛИ🐶💀
0:38
ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬ
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Не плавайте тут! 🏊🚫
0:24
Взрывная История
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН