No video

DOS Gaming PC with Athlon 64?

  Рет қаралды 33,912

PhilsComputerLab

PhilsComputerLab

Күн бұрын

Thank you for watching this video! Hope you found it interesting, please leave a comment and subscribe to the channel!
Disclosure: Some links in this description are affiliate links. I receive a small commission when you make a purchase. There are no additional costs to you.
Support PhilsComputerLab:
Amazon.com: amzn.to/3fvz8sg
AliExpress: s.click.aliexpr...
eBay US: ebay.us/bKzLAW
ebay UK: ebay.us/Bs9Z0u
eBay Germany: ebay.us/k3bPol
eBay Canada: ebay.us/CD6KZz
eBay Australia: ebay.us/eon4Ys
GOG: adtr.co/eqi5mb
PayPal donation: www.paypal.me/...

Пікірлер: 315
@73Bdiddy
@73Bdiddy 4 жыл бұрын
I forgot how difficult it was building a custom PC back then, dealing with IRQ conflicts and boot parameters. DOOM would not load if your config.sys or autoexec.bat don't have the optimum settings. Nowadays people just concentrate on maximum RGB lighting effects. Loved that Wing Commander series.
@johannsmith5697
@johannsmith5697 4 жыл бұрын
I swear we are psychically connected, every time I imagine a build, you build it and release a video on it within the week. Very cool.
@gamingbehemothx999
@gamingbehemothx999 4 жыл бұрын
ME TOO
@mesterak
@mesterak 4 жыл бұрын
Damn I love how you show how to use cheap hardware and get it backwards compatible to run old games. You da man!
@alertol
@alertol 4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about "Prince of Persia", the video and cpu was so low, author invented revolutionary hack to have smooth movements. pixels of charater not redraw at next frame, only changing (XOR-ing) some from the last frame... Later this technic was used in video compression (and still it's the base of all modern video compressions) but Prince was the earliest to do that
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Wow that's cool and very interesting!
@user-kd4pg8hu7t
@user-kd4pg8hu7t 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, but that was for the original Apple II version of the game. The 16-bit versions did not need such magic. He overcame the limitations of the hardware and managed to include combat in the game (no memory left for additional characters). Otherwise, it would have turned out as an oriental prison exploration game. Visit the Ars Technica channel for the full story.
@alertol
@alertol 4 жыл бұрын
@@user-kd4pg8hu7t of course, but the point is, he managed to get smooth movement on so slow system like Apple II Now its simple, You just use compression, and when they did that, they invent one (there was no alternatives)
@gabrielebarbone2250
@gabrielebarbone2250 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab hi phils i have this PC Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5720 Dual Core E2160 1.80GHz 2048Mb 80Gb DVD±RW I can run dos games
@DeadlyGamingLV
@DeadlyGamingLV 4 жыл бұрын
Love these DOS videos, thanks to you Phil I have built 15 retro gaming PCs using a mix of retro and modern parts. Your videos have been an inspiration throughout the past few years and it's always fun building retro machines. :)
@joeyvdm1
@joeyvdm1 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome Phil. You da man. This is an awesome surprise of an bonus video. Much appreciated, I appreciate any and all content you make for us Phil. I am an Athlon/64 fan and I love seeing older hardware put to purpose. Thanks so much for the vid Phil, stay safe and I will catch you on the next one👍
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@appwraith
@appwraith 4 жыл бұрын
Well, that does it. I have 90% of a socket 939 Athlon 64 PC in spares, and I've been looking to get into building a reliable DOS PC. Thanks for the inspiration! :)
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
The tricky parts is finding a compatible sound card. But do go with VIA chipset, should be most compatible with sound cards.
@appwraith
@appwraith 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab Welp.. as it turns out, the motherboard I was thinking of was an AM2 board, so now I'm looking for a motherboard as well as a sound card :D
@m5a1stuart83
@m5a1stuart83 3 жыл бұрын
Just use it for router 😆😆😆
@RETROCENGO
@RETROCENGO 4 жыл бұрын
Phil and MD DOS video, instant like. Have a great day Phil😁👍🏻
@my-yt-inputs2580
@my-yt-inputs2580 4 жыл бұрын
Awesomeness. I still have every computer I ever built. My first PC I bought used. A 486DX-25 that I later had upgraded the motherboard to a DX-33 cpu. I missed the 386 series. Still have both motherboards. I then went through many iterations. DX-100, DX2-66 and on. I had systems I multi-booted between Windows and Dos for gaming. I've been thinking of eBaying all that old stuff.
@frshunter
@frshunter 4 жыл бұрын
Dynamix....now that brought back memories that I had forgotten all about. Red Baron stands out particularly! Although Stellar 7 was one of the first I remember but that was back on the Apple II.
@HZL_AD
@HZL_AD 4 жыл бұрын
Great built for retro Dos game.. i prefer this machine to play all my win98 era games..pair with any ATi 9 series card.. Quake3 arena ,UT 99, Halflife , Rogue Squadron, NFS 2-3 , Blood 2, Tomb raider , Sins, Shogo MAD, ...
@explorer9049
@explorer9049 4 жыл бұрын
I love the ati radeon 9250s, i have crap ton with me that are in agp and pci. :D
@BrianMartin2007
@BrianMartin2007 4 жыл бұрын
That racing game was called "Hard Drivin' in the Arcade here in the USA... So many memories.. and it supported multiple screens/cabinets.. I never got to play those setups, but I did see them.. :P
@theR1ddle
@theR1ddle 4 жыл бұрын
My current DOS machine is an Athlon 64. Great machine, it only cost just under $1000. Of course I bought it well over a decade ago. Maybe it was two decades ago.
@garyslatter9854
@garyslatter9854 4 жыл бұрын
Love seeing #IDE cables...
@garyslatter9854
@garyslatter9854 4 жыл бұрын
#PATA now i suppose
@LordAlacorn
@LordAlacorn 4 жыл бұрын
No, they can rot in hell
@dikbozo
@dikbozo 4 жыл бұрын
@@LordAlacorn Any old ones most likely did. I, for one, do not regret their demise.
@rodrigoacosta9708
@rodrigoacosta9708 4 жыл бұрын
Ribbon cables were such a horrible sight to behold... really few people miss them!!
@Romerco77
@Romerco77 4 жыл бұрын
Nice video!, now for the perfect DOS+Windows 98 overpowered setup, with the Solo-1 for DOS + Sound Blaster Live for Windows exclusively. It needs some serious fiddling with resources, but it works and it is amazing!
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yea that shouldn't be an issue. You can disable the Solo-1 in device manager, and don't install DOS drivers for the Live!
@davidhoracek6758
@davidhoracek6758 4 жыл бұрын
I've been playing around with PCem and I'm now pretty satisfied that the best way to capture the authentic look of DOS games is with emulation. Hardware-level emulation of a 486, S3 Virge/Voodoo and a Soundblaster16 is something that any modern computer can do perfectly. Games that came out after 2001 were optimized for Windows XP,, and backward compatibility for them works pretty reliably. But there is about a five year gap from 1996 to 2001 where games were built for Win95/98. These don't work well in modern Windows, but they require hardware that's quite hard to emulate if you want them to look good. I think that they are the primary reason why you'd want a retro-pc. Of course if you slap a decent graphics card in that AGP slot, this Sempron machine would play them perfectly! I guess that makes it a pretty versatile little thing.
@madmatt2024
@madmatt2024 4 жыл бұрын
The funny thing is that I can usually fish old Athlon, Pentium 4, socket 775, and socket 370 systems out of the E-waste all summer. I don't know if I'll be able to do that this summer due to COVID-19 but if so I could probably get a side hustle going building and selling retro gaming PC's for Window 98 and DOS gaming.
@amberselectronics
@amberselectronics 4 жыл бұрын
These are my favorite videos of yours. Thanks :) For what it's worth, I often see the same scrolling problem with AGP Matrox cards. PCI S3/Cirrus cards seem to be the way to go.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I'll try a Matrox the next time, I don't remember it having issues with Gods...
@amberselectronics
@amberselectronics 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab I'll have to give it a shot again. Most of the issues I remember were with Apogee platformers.
@BillAE91
@BillAE91 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent video as always Phil! You don't always need to break the bank to enjoy some good old DOS gaming!
@xDJxGNOMx
@xDJxGNOMx 4 жыл бұрын
You're almost at 100K! Great for you it's been a long time since 2015 when i subscribed xD
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Hehe thanks :D
@retroftw
@retroftw 4 жыл бұрын
Important note!!! Motherboard chipset a̶n̶d̶ ̶D̶D̶M̶A̶ support MATTERS when using PCI sound cards in DOS! VIA which is used here generally has good compatibility, while nForce from nVidia is useless. Also newer Intel chipsets (ICH6+ !?) dropped support during the Pentium 4 era I believe. Vogons have many threads about this and what works and not: www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=24769 www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=70375 But didn't know it could work with VIA on such a recent platform, cool :-) Also didn't know about the IRQ trick on the PCI slot :-D
@retropcscotland4645
@retropcscotland4645 4 жыл бұрын
Much to learn you still have.
@retroftw
@retroftw 4 жыл бұрын
@@retropcscotland4645 For trying out countless permutations, little time we all have ;-)
@Romerco77
@Romerco77 4 жыл бұрын
Not exactly. Look, this southbridge does not support DDMA and it works. It depends on sound card, this solo-1 has dos sound device as the main device, not legacy, so it is easier to make it run if you manage it to run physically on one of the standard DOS IRQ and the bios is supporting all southbridge features, a bit of luck is involved. Other cards which has the DOS sound device as a legacy device needs DDMA, or a TSR to work in DOS, like the PCI Yamahas, and are highly dependant on drivers support for chipsets.
@retroftw
@retroftw 4 жыл бұрын
@@Romerco77 You are correct, I over simplified things. I'm wrong in saying DDMA is required. Its more correct to say support depends on the chipset...or???
@retroftw
@retroftw 4 жыл бұрын
@@Romerco77 ...or one can say: You can't just use any motherboard with a PCI slot :-p
@superkirpi1405
@superkirpi1405 4 жыл бұрын
i love DOS games. Very thanks from TURKEY. ♪
@alvaroacwellan9051
@alvaroacwellan9051 4 жыл бұрын
On the DOS VGA question - my favorite "modern" DOS video card is another nVidia - a Riva 128, like the Asus 3DP/AGP V3000. The AGP one can give better high resolution performance (yes, even under DOS!), but unfortunately it won't fit this board as the old Riva has an AGP2x interface. Funny that the PCI version that was the "legacy" option when it came out will do just fine here.
@StefanDieWaldfee
@StefanDieWaldfee 4 жыл бұрын
Aww yeah, this is exactly my kind of content ♥
@LorisPeretto
@LorisPeretto 4 жыл бұрын
Another great video Phil, I had retro game nostalgia and begun with a Socket A (462) AMD trying to make DOS work, 6.22. I have yet that installation, but the only thing that I cannot make it work is audio. Omg, I became mad and I tried various audio card, but probably with my Asus motherboard Deluxe this card wasn't made to work pci sound card on Dos unfortuntaly. From that day I made a lot of tries and finally I had a Real Dos machine from 1996 with Banshee video card and a Pentium 200mmx. Games working finally and my audio card on that system was a Sound Blaster AWE64 Value, so can you understand how much I was happy. I figured out to run it on DOS (serious settings on autoexec and config) but now I have a Dos pc that make all games running, and in Glide acceleration too, thanks to 3dfx video card!
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
AWE64 Value is great for DOS! Every game every made should work with it :)
@techniksaal254
@techniksaal254 4 жыл бұрын
Hey Phil, nice1 as always. Since I'm still parting together my 486-DX40 I went a not so modern way using an Epox EP-MVP3G5 with a K6-3 450. Though imho that itself is not that big of a deal I think the jewel in my setup is my used soundcard: The Labway D66. If I'm not mistaken it has the same soundchip as the soundcard you used but in contrary to yours it has a wavetable-header. My hope is to actually use it with my Dreamblaster X2 (it sounds just awesome).
@MarcoGPUtuber
@MarcoGPUtuber 4 жыл бұрын
If you showed this PC to a guy in the 1980s, he'd call you a god.
@Airbag888
@Airbag888 4 жыл бұрын
Because... it'd mean you can time travel? :p
@rebeccaschade3987
@rebeccaschade3987 4 жыл бұрын
Imagine showing a person in the 1980's a modern smartphone.
@rebeccaschade3987
@rebeccaschade3987 4 жыл бұрын
@Little Green Spartan How the heck would they even interface with it back then? :D But yes, I have actually had that conversation with my bf. About being able to go back in time, and show up at the Apollo 11 launch with modern smartphones and laptops and such. "Hey folks, wanna borrow some computing power?" :)
@Elias-ru5xk
@Elias-ru5xk 4 жыл бұрын
Marco Dude, I see you literally everywhere. TechYesCity too
@ToTheGAMES
@ToTheGAMES 4 жыл бұрын
@Little Green Spartan Hmm, not possible due to a lack of radiation hardening. The chips would die pretty soon after leaving our protective atmosphere. Look up why NASA still uses older hardware that is radiation hardened, pretty interesting.
@coldcatbrr
@coldcatbrr 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! I have an old athlon 64 kicking around and now I know what needs to be done.
@mOddEdLiKeHeLL
@mOddEdLiKeHeLL 4 жыл бұрын
Impressive! Thanks again for another great video!
@Airbag888
@Airbag888 4 жыл бұрын
Wolf3D (386DX-40 from AMD) is literally why I did NOT play FPS until I saw Quake 3. It gave me massive headaches Edit: Looking at that S3 Card - I was jonesing SO much for S3 Virge for so long (Tomb Raider days). All I had was a S3 Trio64 same as in this video wahahaha, no 3D = slideshow above 320x200
@airmicrobe
@airmicrobe 4 жыл бұрын
Every blue walls and sky blue doors look the same
@nelizmastr
@nelizmastr 4 жыл бұрын
The S3 ViRGE was hardly 3D either. I have a Stealth 3D 2000 from Diamond and it's really just a speedy 2D card. Falls flat on its face in real 3D accelerated games.
@Airbag888
@Airbag888 4 жыл бұрын
@@nelizmastr by today's standards it's as 3d as a SATA Controller but back then it had proper 3D acceleration support which was well unheard of mostly back then :)
@Airbag888
@Airbag888 4 жыл бұрын
@@airmicrobe Can't tell if that's why.. I was like 12 and with my first computer (aforementioned 386DX-40 which BTW lasted me until I could afford a 233MMX) Wolf3D was installed and Prince of Persia. I literally either had to like Wolf 3D or play PoP. I can tell you I tried real hard but after 15mins I'd be nauseous :p
@Reziac
@Reziac 4 жыл бұрын
I used that same Trio in my P233... was perfectly fine for DOS games. Virge was faster but at the time were expensive and hard to come by.
@TheGameBench
@TheGameBench 4 жыл бұрын
Hmm.... now I really want to do this build in an In Win A500.
@turbo1gts
@turbo1gts 4 жыл бұрын
Or an Enlight desktop case.
@SUCRA
@SUCRA 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Phil! Great video.
@callindocorleone5435
@callindocorleone5435 4 жыл бұрын
Oh wow, loved the intro :D
@PAKA62
@PAKA62 4 жыл бұрын
Thats the cleanest Athlon 64 I've seen in a long time :D EDIT: BTW, there is something wrong with the scrolling in Gods.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I know, I specifically talk about it actually :D
@DeViLzzz2006
@DeViLzzz2006 4 жыл бұрын
Phil, again I think I found some humor in a video of your's but I don't want to touch it with a 10 foot pole. LOL! Anyway good to be back. Retro builds are so cool and it was to be my hobby for 2019 but went a little slow and I had hoped to ramp it up in 2020 but ... yeah. FInally just got to say thanks for a great video.
@smashandburnyt6938
@smashandburnyt6938 4 жыл бұрын
CRT is the best for retro games
@GamingZoom
@GamingZoom 4 жыл бұрын
Been watching your channel for a long time man love your video keep it up 👍🏼👍🏼
@joey_after_midnight
@joey_after_midnight 4 жыл бұрын
Really like the Terratec Sound Card details and how to configure it to serve the place of a Sound Blaster Pro. Especially the IRQ tips. I'm getting very interested in 'Classic' era Sound cards. Many people don't seem to understand Sound Card evolution or history, or how the alternatives like Turtle Beach, Onkyo or M-Audio compare. I do have more interested in ancient NTSC/PAL Video and Sound capture.. but you have to understand how a Sound Card was conceived to work to get to Line Levels and Channels. MIDI, Roland and Game port evolution might be of some interest to other people. Are you strictly a Keyboard or Joystick or Flight Controller style DOS gamer?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Mouse for adventure games but joystick for wing commander.
@BurnedPinguin8630
@BurnedPinguin8630 4 жыл бұрын
You might agree, you might not agree, but hear me out, I personally think that if I was to use this modern of a system for dos gaming, I would just use my modern pc, since to me, owning a 486 or a Pentium for retro games gives the authentic feel, just like if you were in the 90s right now. Nevertheless, enjoyed the video. Rock on Phil!
@smiththers2
@smiththers2 4 жыл бұрын
i wish i played more dos games when i was younger, i dont really remember much about them. my parents started me out on a macintosh, didnt have my first pc til 1999...
@KrissBartlett
@KrissBartlett 4 жыл бұрын
Very nice Phil you were good with your hand this time not waving much hey that is a good mother board i have one to but i put xp on mine its a original compac with same amd cpu thanks i enjoyed this post
@robertol2275
@robertol2275 4 жыл бұрын
the oldest graphics card that I still have is a Trident Providia 9685, and my athlon 64 3200+ was running win7 just fine, and a Radeon HD 2600 pro
@tusharsarode4546
@tusharsarode4546 4 жыл бұрын
100k soon
@prozzac85
@prozzac85 4 жыл бұрын
An Athlon 64 doesn't have to be to slow for XP gaming, I have an X2 4200+ running at 2.76GHz. It runs Farcry really good, and it even does a decent job running newer games like Fallout New Vegas! If I want to play anything newer than that those games usually runs fine on Win 10, so you can play those on your main PC. But after watching this I might have to try running DOS on it to, even if I alreade have two 486 and two pentium systems already. More DOS is good DOS :)
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yea at 2.8 GHz almost and with 2 cores, I can see that it would run all the XP era games just fine!
@dikbozo
@dikbozo 4 жыл бұрын
I am curious as to what cooler you are using on the 4200+. Those Manchester chips weren't particularly cool running when OC'd.
@retropuffer2986
@retropuffer2986 4 жыл бұрын
Woo Hoo! Bonus video! 😁
@JorgeCarvalho_web_dev
@JorgeCarvalho_web_dev 4 жыл бұрын
Hello Phil! What a fantastic video showing some good stuff about VIA chipset. How about a windows98/DOS using socket 370 VIA chipset and an VIA C3 video? I have one build and I can go from 386SX33 thought Pentium 3@500 using SETMUL and a rear case switch to set the FSB to 66 or 133
@InfiniteClouds
@InfiniteClouds 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting to see just how much faster the S939s are in pushing frames in DOS. What's hilarious though is that not even these overpowered CPUs can deliver 60 frames at the max resolution in software Quake! Doom also scores way lower on newer GPUs. Here were some results I recorded on my A64 4000+ 2.4ghz in DOS on an FX5900 Ultra: Quake: 300x200 - 223.1 FPS 640x480 - 85.1 FPS 800x600 - 57.9 FPS 1024x768 - 40.5 FPS 1280x1024 - 41.9 FPS not sure why but this is consistently higher than the lower resolution PCPBench: 320x200 - 269.5 FPS 640x480 - 95.6 FPS ( terrible flickering occurs) ChrisBench: 320x200 - 267.6 FPS 640x480 - 294.8 FPS ... weird but I consistently got higher FPS on the higher resolution with both GPUs. Doom - 72.86 FPS TopBench - 291 Build Engine was very choppy and slow on both the FX5900 and ti4200. I had to drop to a Geforce 3 to get it to run smooth. With WC (MTRRLFBE or FASTVID) enabled on the Geforce 3. Blood: 320x200= 274FPS 640x480= ~60FPS 800x600 = 4FPS ... LIES, feels exactly the same as 640x480. 1024x768 = 24FPS ... more lies.. see above. 1280x1024 = 15FPS ... also lies but certain areas where it dips to 7FPS it feels like it is ~15. 1600x1200 = Locked 50 FPS, totally smooth Duke3D @ 1600 x 1200 = 59/60FPS locked... perfectly smooth. The 4000+ can downclock to 723mhz (180FSB x 4) which is perfect because Outcast in Windows 98 gets cranky above 800mhz and some other games don't like 1ghz+ either, believe it or not.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this data!
@lpgibbo7463
@lpgibbo7463 4 жыл бұрын
I haven't a clue what most of this stuff is about but instantly went back to my Amiga days when I saw Gods!! 😊😊😊
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
The Amiga version plays music throughout. I believe with DOS, it's only the Roland MT-32 version that plays music throughout. The Sound Blaster and Adlib options only play sound effects...
@semloh1870
@semloh1870 4 жыл бұрын
2 days ago I started playing Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis again- I told myself I would never play this game again. 26 years ago in 1994 I got a 486 computer and bought this game. I was in my 2nd year of university and played this game for 2 weeks solid. I was obsessed. It costs me a lot- low grades on essays and affected my overall degree class. But, playing it again, at almost 50 years of age, I can't help by being obsessed by it again. I managed to get it running on a SS7 board with an AMD K6-2 233Mhz. It's so difficult to get the sound working right in this game. Thanks Phil, for inspiring me to return to one of the best games ever made.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
What sound card do you use? Make sure caches are disables and if the game freezes, check your mouse driver, or test without one.
@semloh1870
@semloh1870 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab Thanks for replying. I use 2 cards- the first is a SB Vibra 16x CT4170 ISA from 1997 which is pretty unimpressive in Windows and DOS. In Windows 98 I can get music but no voice in FATE. My other card is a new, Chinese clone which can be bought from Asian sites like Shopee and Lazada- very cheap- cost 3-4 dollars. It's a CMI8738. It came with a small CD with drivers for DOS and many Windows. In Fate it plays music well and voice but sounds like punches when Indy fights do not work. This is in Windows 95. It works pretty well for the price except if you play Canyon.mid it sounds terrible.
@josteinkallevik
@josteinkallevik 4 жыл бұрын
Hope you can show us some multiplayer dos, win98 setup soon. Like doom in multiplayer:)
@georgemaragos2378
@georgemaragos2378 4 жыл бұрын
Hi All, maybe one day do a video on 2 player game(s) with null modem cable - all you need is 3 wires using 9 or 25 pin serial - this uses soft ware on / off, you then add 1 or 2 more ground wires for hardware flow control / handshaking Then say video 2 , show how to set up lan card. The main problem is you need to fully initialize a lan card in dos, you only need to load driver ( say ne2000 compatible ) and then IPX or ODI - the lan card only needs to be set up to send and receive packets it does not really need to connect to a network as a client or server I still have CO-axial cable under the house between my spare room and my sons room - used for doom, later on simplified it with serial cable, later on updated to the new cat 5 and a 5 port hub Let me think, dos multi player games was . Doom / Quake series, Duke Nukem 3d, Rise Of The Triad, Command and Conquer , Warcraft, Decent, a few 486 era fighter plane tank games Regards George
@Matt08719801
@Matt08719801 4 жыл бұрын
one benefit i found with starter also is theres better glide emulation options available on 7 starter than in xp
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
nGlide runs even on Windows 98 which is pretty cool :)
@Matt08719801
@Matt08719801 4 жыл бұрын
im sure sone old games will run on 10 im just not a fan of forced updates and telemetry , 7 is the best all around ops microsoft ever made , xp is my favorite legacy , i did not experience dos other than brief use in middle school keyboarding classes so i have no nostalgia to dos i was consoling back then, xp had just came out when i managed to get my first pc back in 2001 so xp is to me like dos is to some. however i love a lot of fps games from the dos era so i try to get the most games i can to run on xp and 7 , so far ive managed to get most
@FullMetal-Tech
@FullMetal-Tech 4 жыл бұрын
I was testing different cards under DOS for high resolution and high frame rate between a S3 virge stealth 2000, ATI Rage II and Nvidia TNT II m64 and found the TNT II m64 can run high frame rates at 800 x 600 ( Duke Nukem 3D/ Descent 1 and 2) - 1024 x 768 ( mech warrior 2 ) on a PII 233mhz slot one with fast vid.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yea those Nvidia cards are pretty decent in DOS!
@cartonwaffle
@cartonwaffle 4 жыл бұрын
You just got another subscriber
@MrJ0mmy
@MrJ0mmy 4 жыл бұрын
GREAT video
@JaniHalinen
@JaniHalinen 4 жыл бұрын
Socket 754 is interesting and parts are still quite cheap. Maybe you could do a follow up on these with Socket 754 Turion 64 (ML or MT) cpus? Do they offer maybe any benefits for retro gaming like can those mobile processors be made even slower than their desktop counterparts? Many desktop 754 motherboards support Turion CPUs, only the heatsink might need adapting because Turions don't have the heat spreader and are thus a bit lower.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I remember looking into this, and the top CPU cost just too much to make this feasible... Also for DOS gaming, slow is good :) It doesn't need to be a high end CPU...
@moomah5929
@moomah5929 4 жыл бұрын
I should play around with my old Phenom II X6 that I still have lying in my cellar incl. board and cooler but not much else. Windows 98 had problems because the RAM modules being 2GB but might work for pure DOS. Maybe Memory Hole at 15-16 MB will reduce the RAM to 15MB like it does with my Pentium 233 MMX having 256MB. Under DOS only a max 64MB is actually used but is too much for some games.
@wfp9378
@wfp9378 2 жыл бұрын
Rescued an Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2Ghz a couple of weeks ago. My first ever Athlon. It has been slowly dawning on me that it doesn't have the guts as a WinXP gaming system. My "slower" 2.4Ghz Pentium 4 just seems faster all around which is confusing me as passmark indicates the Athlon should be twice as fast. That said, making it a Win98 or DOS system seems like a fun project but getting PCI soundcards now isn't so easy. The SBLive seems to be the most prolific but these bring their own issues to the party.
@the360gaming5
@the360gaming5 4 жыл бұрын
Cool video
@nataliagasiorowska6608
@nataliagasiorowska6608 4 жыл бұрын
Phil - awesome video :) Pozdrowienia z Polski! :)
@playtech7165
@playtech7165 4 жыл бұрын
I was never able to run one pci card in DOS before, I will try again some day... Someone even gave me an old isa creative sound card (is not even a soundblaster, I don't remember the model) but I couldn't make it run either, I have few motherboards with isa slots and none are good. Although I used msdos as a child, I am more of the era of windows 95 and 98 my knowledge of msdos is very limited. However I think the msdos game era from 1992/93 to 1996/97 was a golden era and I regret not having conserved my hardware from that time.
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
Very old ISA cards need a -5V rail on the power supply, otherwise they do nothing. Maybe that is your issue. Also check for resource jumpers to set IRQ etc. on the soundcard hardware itself.
@playtech7165
@playtech7165 4 жыл бұрын
@@armorgeddon Thanks i'll check
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
It's all about having the drivers and knowing how to setup your startup files, or use a batch file. There is no universal solution as every sound card is different.
@ironinquisitor3656
@ironinquisitor3656 4 жыл бұрын
All I need now is a power supply for my Windows 98 gaming PC project. Not sure which one to get as it would need to fit inside the old Emachine case I'm using. The stock power supply it came with probably won't be enough for want I want to do.
@misticjoeCZ
@misticjoeCZ 4 жыл бұрын
These games will work on any modern computer with DOS. But you can see some weird things even in a DOOM. That first IMP for example - the AI is completely muffled. On real 486-586 CPUs, he fires "at a first sight". Also, try QEMM or some "p2patch" programs. And some games, which does not control timing - like Beach volley, or Test Drive. I tried this thing ten or more years ago on my Athlon X4. There is no such thing as 100% joy on modern hardware. btw: buy an Amiga or some modern A500 clones - all these games will sound and looks better (except 3D games, ofcourse - for DOOM youll need 030, for Quake mc68060 cpu)
@explorer9049
@explorer9049 4 жыл бұрын
hmm i always wonder why some vga chips on video cards can't do smooth scrolling in dos games that use adaptive tile refresh, it seems alot of via and ati graphics cards have these issues along with other video cards.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Do you know of other games that display the issue I've seen with Gods?
@explorer9049
@explorer9049 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab i tested a lot of games like commander keen & bio menace and they all have problems like this. On this particular video card aka "s3 unichrome pro" i'd avoid a lot of old side scrollers. yes turrican 2 has this issue as well... sad face :(
@Bigharb65
@Bigharb65 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Phil, I’ve been trying to decide on what CPU/Platform to build a MS-DOS PC on. My 2 main candidates came down to socket 478 pentium 4s and socket 754 or 939 Athlon 64s but I haven’t had much experience with Athlon 64 (yet). From your experience which CPU would be a better choice? Oh and may I suggest you make a video on MS-DOS on a Pentium 4 because I think many people including me would be interested in that video/topic. Have a nice day and hope you see my comment.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 3 жыл бұрын
With Athlon 64 you have choices of VIA chipset, which have better support with DOS PCI sound cards. That is a strong reason why I would go with Athlon 64.
@Bigharb65
@Bigharb65 3 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab thanks for the replay. Do you know of any slower Athlon 64 or sempron that would be better for DOS?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 3 жыл бұрын
@@Bigharb65 Pick one with Cool and Quiet support. The multiplier, and voltage, can be lowered through BIOS and even software! Cache disabled with software (some have BIOS option) turning it into a 486 PC quite easily. Maybe I should make a video about this, but there is another one I want to do first using LGA 775 Pentium 4 or Core 2 :D
@Bigharb65
@Bigharb65 3 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab oooo dos on a core 2 seems fun but you might run into a good bit of compatibility errors. Anyways thanks for the replay and if you need any retro or somewhat newer parts let me know cause I can get retro parts for like $5 a part and $2 a CPU.
@michal13151315
@michal13151315 4 жыл бұрын
Test Klliser x79 M3 it cost 53usd, sata3 usb3.0 m.2 nvme in small matx standard 242*179mm. They can fit in Jonsbo C2 case so can by nice base for cheap small gaming pc.
@e8root
@e8root 4 жыл бұрын
I prefer 440BX and some Pentium3/Celeron, preferably Tualatin, for DOS gaming and real ISA sound cards
@flandrble
@flandrble 4 жыл бұрын
Increase the system RAM latency could drop your speed even further for older games.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent tip!
@kofteburger
@kofteburger 4 жыл бұрын
Great video as always Phil. The bit about graphics card got me thinking. What is the latest graphics card that support dos graphics modes like vga or ega do you reckon? Can a period accurate GeForce (4? Fx?) for Athlon 64 play dos games I wonder.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Oh you can run DOS games on a modern i7 machine...
@kofteburger
@kofteburger 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab and what about gpus? Can a GeForce rtx 2080 run in ega mode?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
@@kofteburger Send me one and I'll tell you :D
@kingster3835
@kingster3835 4 жыл бұрын
ohhhh those memories............ currently getting all parts together for oldschool gaming - would i be able to play latest win 9x games smoothly with Celeron D, asrock 775i65g + 2x512mb ddr ram+geforce 7600GT 256mb ddr3?
@ygorbachev
@ygorbachev 4 жыл бұрын
There are no drivers for 7 series and Win98.
@user-kd4pg8hu7t
@user-kd4pg8hu7t 4 жыл бұрын
@@ygorbachev I've read there should be unofficial drivers for the 7000 series, but have no idea about potential issues and compatibility.
@Ozfrank
@Ozfrank 3 жыл бұрын
Interesting video, i have old motherboard with 128mb SDRAM and 1200mhz Celeron-256, with no agp slot, but i have some video cards like a ET6000, maybe i can build a retro DOS machine)
@danielberrett2179
@danielberrett2179 4 жыл бұрын
BONUS!
@Reziac
@Reziac 4 жыл бұрын
I can find all sorts of CF to IDE slot adapters, and SD to IDE that dangle loose from the end of the cable (I have a couple of those, work great but a nuisance to keep from contacting metal), but could not find a slot-mounted adapter like the one shown at 3:26.... source? Thanks!
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Sometimes China doesn't continue making some products, so the one I have is something I got ages ago...
@Reziac
@Reziac 4 жыл бұрын
Ah, that might explain it. Still, at least now I know it exists and can keep an eye out. Exactly what I need for my DOS-only system!
@moeschizlac
@moeschizlac 3 жыл бұрын
Do a video on a Number Nine pepper pro ISA graphics card if you can find one. Number Nine ISA graphics cards are difficult to find.
@Baoran
@Baoran 4 жыл бұрын
Is there a reason why you don't use throttle to slow down the pc for dos use? My main problem with my athlon64 system and dos is lack of conventional memory because I won't be able load many of the TSRs to upper memory area like optical drivers/mscdex. Mostly because such newer motherboard seems to reserve much of that area even when most things disabled in bios settings.
@stealth5508
@stealth5508 3 жыл бұрын
@PhilsComputerLab Wonderful build! Any other specific reasons apart from cost for going with an Athlon 64 for DOS/98 retro setup rather than a socket 370 mobo with VIA chipset.
@modernandretrogaming
@modernandretrogaming 4 жыл бұрын
Great movie, I just build machine with Athlon XP 1700+ and mainboard with KM133 chipset where I also have S3 integrated videocard :) Will you try someday some ATI CIF games like Tomb Raider on ATI Rage (they don't cost much) videocards?
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
Did you try Gods on that integrated S3?
@modernandretrogaming
@modernandretrogaming 4 жыл бұрын
@@armorgeddon I tried only some 3DMark2000 and 99 and first Tomb Raider in software mode and all worked good in 98SE, in windows 2000 I have problems with drivers, 3DMark2000 crashes. I'm using MSI MS-6511 mainboard, it's packard bell oem mainboard version made by MSI for them.
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
Oh ok, so you didn't test any gaming in real DOS. Tomb Raider btw ist a DOS game s performance and visuals could be better in real DOS mode. Would be interesting to know if Gods shows the same scrolling issue on your older integrated S3 graphics like Phil experienced. Regarding the the ATI CIF Tomb Raider: are you just interested in exactly that or how to max out graphics in Tomb Raider? Since for Tomb Raider there is a modern project for modern hardware which is based on the ATI CIF release of the game.
@modernandretrogaming
@modernandretrogaming 4 жыл бұрын
@@armorgeddon I try that game in DOS for you on that integrated S3, I know about that project with CIF to OpenGL wrapper, I even tried that and worked very good, but I also want to try ATI CIF on real hardware and I will do it when I receive ATI Rage XL which I just bought today.
@modernandretrogaming
@modernandretrogaming 4 жыл бұрын
@@armorgeddon I just tried Gods on integrated S3 videocard there and worked without any scrolling problems, also on ATI Rage 128 game worked good.
@Matt08719801
@Matt08719801 4 жыл бұрын
Phil i found an older operating system that seems to run all the game windows xp can run , i installed windows 7 starter on a system and so far i'm able to get those few game i could not run on 64 bit operating systems with xp era games to run on starter 32bit windows 7. if you want some content to test id love to see your results with windows 7 starter vs the older operating systems
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Windows 10 32 Bit will likely run those games also!
@ted-b
@ted-b 4 жыл бұрын
Nice one Phil, or you could just use your "killer" 98se machine to run "Dos Box", like I do, lol.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
It can do both, perform well in Windows 98 and then shut down into MS-DOS mode.
@zarkeh3013
@zarkeh3013 4 жыл бұрын
with a right combo of parts, this platform can easily run DOS and Windows! I noticed in DOS setmul.exe reported multiplier modification and could be scripted.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yes there are tools to set the multiplier in DOS and Windows 98 :)
@FeverDev64
@FeverDev64 4 жыл бұрын
I rmember having same soundcard and motherboard but with a celeron D 315 256k cache very slow processor with 80gb ide hdd witha combo cdrw dvdrw drive as well as 256mb sd ddr ram with the integrated graphics
@PatricksRetro
@PatricksRetro 3 жыл бұрын
Awesome video! You talked about the likelihood of this hardware lasting longer. I have multiple boards from the mid 2000s (mostly MSI, socket 939 and 754) that already have capacitors that need to be replaced while basically all my Hardware from the 90s is still fine. In general, how do you deal with 386/486 boards and capacitors? Do you make regular visual checks or do you replace them as a precaution at some point? I am always a little bit afraid that I will miss when they show visual signs of age and that they blow and take the mainboard with them.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 3 жыл бұрын
True, but capacitors is a very easy replacement. But you have a point, older parts might be just as reliable, and last as long, but there is also cost. A 386 or 486 system just costs a lot more than an Athlon 64 or Pentium 4.
@PatricksRetro
@PatricksRetro 3 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab I was more asking in general as I am fortunate enough to have some old machines from my childhood. But that is true, I was really surprised when I saw the prices recently.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 3 жыл бұрын
@@PatricksRetro Ah fair enough, I skimmed over the question it seems. Well, AFAIK 386 boards don't seem to have capacitors. At least not the ones from the cap plague, that later boards suffer from.
@kami4542
@kami4542 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome video !! Already tried that years ago thanks to A64LOWP by Falcosoft working under DOS (maybe you know this software, nonetheless I suggest you try it. It works also with AMD Geode and Athlon XP Mobile but not with the KT133/KT133A chipsets) but it's nice to share it and popularize, vulgarize for the ones who didn't know it could be possible to use differently the Athlon64
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yes I know of that tool! Used with an AMD Geode :)
@brostenen
@brostenen 4 жыл бұрын
Can you test this setup, just with an YMF724 card instead? It is that OPL core that might be a good choice. You get waveblaster header and SB-Pro as well.
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
Would be very interesting and likely work well, especially since the YMF7x4 series scales up nicely to Windows XP and the 3D audio support in Windows 98 it seems perfect for an Athlon64 build like this. Its the main reason i bought a YMF744 over the other cards (That and the ESS Solo-1 not being availible).
@brostenen
@brostenen 4 жыл бұрын
@@Henk717 I love them 724's for Win98 builds. They are perfect cards on that system. The bad part is that the MIDI/Wavetable in the XG chip. Are not avaliable in Dos. That can be solved with a Dreamblaster board. The 724 or 744 is perfect if you wish to build a machine that can dualboot MS Dos 6.22 and Win98 on each their own primaery partition.
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
@@brostenen Even better, not just MS Dos 6.22 i got drivers for my YMF744 all the way up to Windows 7 32-bit. The XG sounds great on the card but indeed only in Windows. But given mine has a game port and MIDI support i could hook it up to my modern PC with my favorite sound fonts and VST's. Phil has a tutorial somewhere on his channel on how to pull that off. I don't think mine has a wavetable board option though, but if it does that would certainly be interesting.
@brostenen
@brostenen 4 жыл бұрын
@@Henk717 I would never build a computer for both Win98 and WinXP. There are issues with Win98, if you go above 512mb, and WinXP run best with at least 2gb.
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
@@brostenen The memory i am not to concerned about, i got the necessary patches and fixes to get it to behave. But in a worst case scenario i can always have swappable memory sticks.
@JohnGeekHardware
@JohnGeekHardware 4 жыл бұрын
Why testing very old games is not from the era of the processor ?!
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
Its certainly a very interesting promising result, it does leave me with a few questions though regarding my own time machine attempt i am planning out: - What is the fastest GPU('s) i could use while still maintaining the good Win98 and DOS Compatibility in such a machine? Ideally i'd run as many Windows XP games as i can get away with while retaining perfect Win98 and DOS compat with all the VESA modes and scrolling in games like Commander Keen working fantastic. Would a Nvidia 6800 work for this or do i have to go with something older? And could i use a Voodoo 3 for example as the secondary card or would i be better off using a Voodoo 1 or Voodoo 2. - Would this work with a faster Athlon 64 or are your results specific to the model that you picked? - How far could you get this down with other throttling methods like the tool Throttle or software based slowdown. Would it be possible to get super early dos games to work for example?
@Baoran
@Baoran 4 жыл бұрын
Geforce fx 5950 ultra is probably fastest gpu for perfect compatibility because after that you would lose 8 bit paletted textures support for some win98 games. If you don't care about those games you can go to nvidia 6000 series cards.
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
@@Baoran The 6000 series is a LOT cheaper, do you know anything about the DOS compatibility of these cards? Do they support all the modes you'd expect?
@Baoran
@Baoran 4 жыл бұрын
@@Henk717 Dos compatibility is fine with 6000 series pretty much same as with FX series. Only problems you might have is with some win98 games.
@Henk717
@Henk717 4 жыл бұрын
@@Baoran Awesome, final question compared to something like a Radeon 9700 what would you recommend? The nvidia or the radeon? The aim is to support as much as possible.
@Baoran
@Baoran 4 жыл бұрын
@@Henk717 Radeon cards have worse dos compatibility than Nvidia cards so I use nvidia cards in any pc meant for dos games. In Win98 and winXP the compatibility is as good as nvidia 6000 series which means that all radeon cards have the same problem as 6000 series with the same win9x games.
@Fre1maurer
@Fre1maurer 4 жыл бұрын
What i am wondering is, would it be possible to use a graphics card in the AGP slot with DVI output in the DOS environment? And what would be the result in regards of capturing the video output if it works? I think that would be really interesting for capturing old DOS games, because VGA/70Hz/LowRes is always a problem. Almost no capture device, even if it says "supports VGA", does not capture the classic gaming modes of VGA (320*200, 320*240) correctly. Maybe an idea for another short video?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Yes that works quite well! Some games don't like running at 60 Hz though, like Lotus III the music will run slower :)
@alextirrellRI
@alextirrellRI 4 жыл бұрын
I was saying "Hey guys" by myself at the top... but then!
@surfacner5989
@surfacner5989 4 жыл бұрын
Sonic 2 bonus video
@renzh19
@renzh19 4 жыл бұрын
So nice dear
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
👍
@depth386
@depth386 4 жыл бұрын
I don’t mean to be snarky but how is this better than simply running DOS Box 0.74 on basically any PC these days? I still play Master of Orion 2 this way sometimes. On a 9900K god pc.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
It comes down to real DOS vs emulated DOS and what you prefer :)
@BobHannent
@BobHannent 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Phil, Is there any chance you might to an Atom 330 build? Perhaps with an Ion graphics? There are a number of cheap Ion systems out there for very little and I am not sure if Win 98 or earlier would be any good?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I do have a thin client with some type of Atom CPU...
@lordmithras47
@lordmithras47 4 жыл бұрын
I've been saying this for years, but with the knowledge we have today, there's absolutely no reason (for me at least) to invest in the Socket A / Socket 462 platform. The Socket 754/939 VIA-chipset platforms have excellent Windows 98 support, support modern AMD coolers and (most importantly) support modern ATX power supplies. What I'm curious about, and you've actually covered this in your previous videos, how suitable would a SIS chipset fare as a Windows 98 / DOS machine? To my knowledge the onboard display should be equivalent to a GeForce 2 MX 200 with very decent DOS compatability. To answer my own question, the uncertainty probably lies with the SIS South Bridge's ability to do TDMA (or its derivatives).
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Hmm I don't think I've done something with SIS chipset yet, but just a matter of time I guess :)
@lordmithras47
@lordmithras47 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab : Well, I think it'll add value. I've found some of SiS's stuff to be very underrated, particularly the 6326 (has decent VGA output and DOS compatability) and SIS 315 (which is actually a decent Windows 9x 3D card).
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
SIS mainboards at least ran Windows 98 and Me very well back in the day. Reason for socket A systems: 3dfx AGP cards.
@lordmithras47
@lordmithras47 4 жыл бұрын
@@armorgeddon : I have a Socket 478 motherboard with a SiS chipset and universal agp slot. Great for 3dfx cards too, but incredibly difficult to find good coolers.
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, 478 and SIS can also be a nice combination. Coolers can be a problem yes, sometimes an option is to just use the best heatsink you can find without it's original fan and provide the airflow via a big modern fan mounted elsewhere, maybe helped by some DIY air ducting/guiding.
@dphukan007
@dphukan007 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, PLEASE MAKE A VIDEO ON xeon E5-2650L v3
@SvDKILLSWITCH
@SvDKILLSWITCH 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video Phil! It's always nice to see these alternative builds for retro gaming. I have a couple of questions if anyone can help. - This video is based around an Athlon 64-era system, but is a similar thing achievable with an Athlon XP? I have an Athlon XP 2600+ (Thoroughbred-B). - As far as I know, DOS compatibility (specifically sound cards) is bad with nForce 2 motherboards - is this still the case? The motherboard I have is a Gigabyte GA-7N400 Pro 2 (rev 2.0) which uses the nForce 2 Ultra 400 chipset. If I were to consider using my Athlon XP for a DOS retro gaming build, should I just look towards buying a different motherboard with a VIA chipset? Or would it be worth looking to angle towards a Windows 98 build instead? - The video card I have available on hand is a 3dfx Voodoo Banshee (specifically a Skywell Magic TwinPower PCI) - what's DOS support like for this chipset? It's basically a Voodoo2 with a single TMU instead of dual TMUs, and built-in 2D acceleration where the Voodoo2 required a separate 2D card.
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I don't see any benefit in using Socket A. I believe Nvidia chipset are bad for DOS sound card compatibility.
@danielarnestad5509
@danielarnestad5509 4 жыл бұрын
nForce2 is really bad for legacy sound under DOS. It looks like it lacks support or has a bad implementation of subtractive decoding needed for using ISA addresses over the PCI bus.
@thepirategamerboy12
@thepirategamerboy12 4 жыл бұрын
Would you know if this can run Magic Carpet playably in 640x480, or would it be too slow/fast?
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
I think it will run just fine, seeing slowed down it acts like a 486 DX.
@retropcscotland4645
@retropcscotland4645 4 жыл бұрын
G'day Phil single or dual core? I recently put DOS on my old K6-2 system and it works great. As to Athlon 64 would you recommend a single core over a dual?
@Romerco77
@Romerco77 4 жыл бұрын
There in no support for multiple cores in Win98, so the answer is obvious 😅
@philscomputerlab
@philscomputerlab 4 жыл бұрын
Single of course!
@retropcscotland4645
@retropcscotland4645 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab Thanks mate.
@retropcscotland4645
@retropcscotland4645 4 жыл бұрын
@@philscomputerlab The only single core Athlon 64 I have is for socket 939 and the board I have is also a VIA chipset. I might give this a go.
@joelb9
@joelb9 3 жыл бұрын
How about Dune II?
@pankoza
@pankoza 4 жыл бұрын
Next video: DOS Gaming PC with Core I9?
@kha6kha669
@kha6kha669 4 жыл бұрын
I have the amd antholn 215 ,sam someone recomend me a decent gpu?
@amandaborrow8822
@amandaborrow8822 4 жыл бұрын
Would you have any interest in checking out the MiSTer 386 pc core? I would love to see the PhilsComputerLab treatment of how it compares to authentic hardware or one of your transformer dos retro builds. What you think of it's OPL2/3 implementation? It's handling of finicky dos games like Wing Commander etc. And much more besides I'm sure. I know you've done videos on MiST in the past so thought it might be right up your alley. Love what you do on this channel! github.com/MiSTer-devel/ao486_MiSTer
@armorgeddon
@armorgeddon 4 жыл бұрын
That would indeed make a very good video.
Building a DOS Retro PC that everyone can afford
46:57
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 146 М.
Athlon 64 with Roland MT-32?
21:29
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Bony Just Wants To Take A Shower #animation
00:10
GREEN MAX
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Мы сделали гигантские сухарики!  #большаяеда
00:44
ПОМОГЛА НАЗЫВАЕТСЯ😂
00:20
Chapitosiki
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Building Windows 98 Retro Gaming PC with AMD Athlon 64 Platform
21:29
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 68 М.
Running Demanding DOS Games on Affordable Hardware
16:35
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 36 М.
Gaming on a 25yr old Pentium 75
20:49
RetroSpector78
Рет қаралды 40 М.
Building AMD based retro WinXP gaming PC with FTP server
20:19
A CPU ahead of its time: The Pentium Pro
24:12
Bits und Bolts
Рет қаралды 60 М.
Matrox Parhelia....The Final Graphics Card.
18:39
Budget-Builds Official
Рет қаралды 244 М.
Sound Blaster Audigy Review
29:14
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 40 М.
1000 MHz Pentium III Windows 98 Retro Gaming PC Build
19:46
PhilsComputerLab
Рет қаралды 88 М.
Bony Just Wants To Take A Shower #animation
00:10
GREEN MAX
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН