Our science fiction auteur has a knack for sequels... #review #dune #duneparttwo #dunepart2 #dunetrailer #scifi #denisvilleneuve
Пікірлер: 8
@gagestandingready14722 ай бұрын
I'm 48yrs old and this is the greatest cinematic experience of my life!
@Johnston2122 ай бұрын
Going to see it in IMAX in a few hours. I'm mostly going for just the cinematic experience. The adaptation is something that I don't particularly care for.
@ScorchedRabbit2 ай бұрын
I would like to second what you said, the film is really worth seeing in IMAX. And I also would like to recommend the Dune book, if you liked the film, the book is much more in-depth about Paul's journey.
@KnarfStein2 ай бұрын
I'm still blown away by how the effect of the dune collapse was done physically when Villeneuve reveals it in the Vanity Fair video.
@ph84292 ай бұрын
Great review!
@jamesodonnell36362 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it, I guess, but I'm a big fan of the novels, and nothing of Herbert's work remains in this vapid, barely-literate, 3-hour-long, "Dune" themed music video... which also effaces every interesting idea and character from Herbert's universe, inserting modern societal neuroses (men vs. women, deists vs. secularists) in place of deep, philosophical explorations. The success of these movies lets us know that "The Feelies" -- right out of Huxley's "Brave New World" -- have supplanted cinema (and made the novel obsolete). But for me, there's just not enough soma in the world to enjoy this picayune dreck.
@anthonyburn1010Ай бұрын
You lost me at vapid. Dune on film is just not for you, is it. Stick to the books.
@jamesodonnell3636Ай бұрын
@anthonyburn1010 -- I suppose one man's "vapid" is another man's "scintillating," but I'm hardly the first person to point out how listless, superficial, and interminable the DV "Dune" films are. I honestly went into the film expecting to like it -- a lot -- but there's not a single memorable event or interesting line of dialogue in the entire film, IMO. And the main characters, outside of Javier Bardem, are wooden (Chalamet) and inauthentic (Zendaya). Even Josh Brolin, Dave Bautista, and Stellan Skarsgard are wasted in the film. Austin Butler's physical performance is good, but the character of Feyd-Rautha is boring: one-dimensional "evil." Anyway, I don't begrudge other people their good time at the movies, but the ridiculous way that people are heaping praise on this well-crafted-and-glitzy-but-otherwise-pedestrian film makes me worry for the future of Western civilization. That said, if I'd never read the source material, I can picture walking out of this movie thinking it was pretty good -- not "the LOTR/Star Wars of its generation," but pretty good. It's the cynical (and manipulative) deviations from the novel that makes me hold DV's film in contempt, rather than just disliking it. But yes, you're right, I should stick to the books. After feeling burned this time, I'll surely pass on DV's "Dune Messiah."