Apaolo, really mpg,.. thanks.

Karreil2525 ‘your’?

@@EnduranceHour Thanks man. 👌

The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

@@EnduranceHour No. It's you're which is contraction for you are.

Never heard anyone say shawd at my job I work at an Acura dealership 😂

Exactly what I thought

I see a lot more aspec RDXs than any other trim

Is the apple play wireless

ImNotReallyBritish #blessed

HALWG51 Me too!

I have a map and one of those globe compass with water inside attached to my dashboard.

Hey grandpa, thanks for commenting under my video!

● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up. ● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up.

Turbocharged engine. You do not have to use premium, but its recommended.

Too old

Derrick Scott #truth I’d probably do the same thing if I was in their situation ;-)

@@everymandriver I lol'd

The Advance is $49,000 MSRP

@@eyefocus2 Wow... up $12,000.00 since 6 years.

While(Acura RDX -14.3) 4% or so is the average decline in MSRP at auction, some cars performed much worse than average. Here are the five worst cars for model years 2013 to 2015 for retained value in the third quarter, as compiled by KBB. 5. Acura RDX (-14.3%) The RDX was Acura's first compact luxury crossover SUV that showed up on dealer floors in 2006. While the vehicle has earned top ratings for safety from places such as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, sites such as Consumer Reports found it to be something of a mixed bag, highlighting its safety features such as lane-departure warnings, but also saying its dashboard controls are "an exercise in needless stupidity." USAToday

Fix: No sharp turns.

● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up.

Looks like a female anatomy

No, I agree! I also hate that about most vehicles nowadays, entirely too many buttons in that "Center stack". In fact, my Ridgeline is quite the opposite. Very few buttons and straight forward center stack. I love that about it!

monzx3 dont forget the stiff seats and low profile rims that plague most modern vehicles. Man I wish those days where things were couches on wheels.

K. Theodos I feel you!

I own this vehicle and I think the interior is super easy to use everything is within reach its really nice.

● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up.

Agreed. Burns too much gas for any performances

@@ontarioman6301 The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

@@normt5463 did you get one of these Buicks? I didn't like some of the plastics in the 2019 but may look at the 2021 in a couple years as a used model.

@@msschill yes, I had a 2016 Envision Prem ll. They are very nice and refined for the money. The new 2021 looks like a baby Meecedes GLE ans much better than GLB. Very sharp!

Can you send me a financial donation to support the research and production time, LOL?

@@everymandriver LOL DID DAVID EVER SEND THAT DEPOSIT OVER BRO? THIS HAS NOT AGED WELL DAVID.

I’m with you you 100%! What is 360 camera so hard to get? (Makes Nissan look good) I like the look of the A spec ( outside the red interior) but I need to have 360 camera in anything my fiancé drives. lol

@@damiienevo4053 Dude, 360 camera is available is 25k cars now days. My wife has a 2017 Nissan Rouge and that also comes with heated steering and 360 camera. It's just convenient you know when pulling in to a parking spot of trying to do parallel parking. My 2016 Kia Optima SXL also has that option with HD cam. That's why I hate Honda Acura products.

Syed Alam agreed it’s all Nissan every Nissan.. that’s why I said it makes Nissan look good

Syed Alam I wish the A-Spec model had rain-sensing wipers also

Eleanor Massaro Oh yeah

Christopher Dorsey I did the 2019

I thought Toyota banned him when he damage a RAV-4! LOL!

All luxury models offer torque vectoring rear differential today. The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

@@normt5463 False. Black Bear

@@mikem.2688 sorry, I know the facts hurt.

Norm T Fact: Bears eat beets.

@@mikem.2688 The fact is Mikey didnt eat his vegetables when told.

Correct, no AA.

Shaun Jones I don’t miss the touch screen and the finger prints.

Agree

"Consumer Reports can no longer recommend six car models, including the Acura RDX SUV... because of problems identified in CR’s annual reliability survey. The survey has data on 470,000 vehicles as reported by their owners."

Nahhh touch screen will be dangerous with the rech..the touch pad actually makes it easier to drive while browsing..i have this car since aug/18...

Frendo I am grayed out.

I love a red interior. I have a BMW X6 black exterior with red inside. I have not gotten tired of it yet. It’s actually the reason I’m watching this video.

@@CarlaWalters I actually like red interiors also, but it gets tiring because manufacturers try to put them in every car. BMW is the original red interior in my opinion.

@@meatbeansandcheese facts

Cant agree more

While(Acura RDX -14.3) 4% or so is the average decline in MSRP at auction, some cars performed much worse than average. Here are the five worst cars for model years 2013 to 2015 for retained value in the third quarter, as compiled by KBB. 5. Acura RDX (-14.3%) The RDX was Acura's first compact luxury crossover SUV that showed up on dealer floors in 2006. While the vehicle has earned top ratings for safety from places such as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, sites such as Consumer Reports found it to be something of a mixed bag, highlighting its safety features such as lane-departure warnings, but also saying its dashboard controls are "an exercise in needless stupidity." USAToday

The GMC Terrain 3.6l Denali handled as well.

no way

You got a point.

Not sliding and reclining rear seat like QX50 and Buick Envision

Sean Heery, you can start the RDX from your cell phone using Acura Link.

@@juanlara5773 only for so many months for free.

bassandtrebleclef Then you better avoid Scotty Kilmer’s channel because his titles will confuse the hell out of you :-)

@@everymandriver true dat!

@@everymandriver looks like a failure to me. "Consumer Reports can no longer recommend six car models, including the Acura RDX SUV... because of problems identified in CR’s annual reliability survey. The survey has data on 470,000 vehicles as reported by their owners."

Daniel Melendez Sounds like you didn’t watch the entire video, at the end I talk about how you can see and hear my Drive experience.

The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

It's an Acura, not a Mazda

@@normt5463 Also, Acura (Honda) is by far more reliable than any GM product. And this is coming from someone that owned an Outlook, Acadia and now Enclave. The best was the outlook, Acadia had the engine module replaced at 23k miles, the outlook 2 coils failed at like the 45k mile mark, and had random issues, small but quite often, so far the Enclave is doing OK, but it only has 32k miles and is still under warranty, reason for buying those cars? Interior space, they are bigger and I like the style more than the explorer, but the wife drives it, Kids are grown up now and don't need that much room now, so this Acura looks very good.

Be honest, would you still take rdx over maccan gts or glc63 if money wasnt issue for you ?

"Consumer Reports can no longer recommend six car models, including the Acura RDX SUV... because of problems identified in CR’s annual reliability survey. The survey has data on 470,000 vehicles as reported by their owners."

● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up.

@@normt5463 I find a touch screen much more distracting and even a knob. The Acura's touch pad is much easier as it is direct touch. I have it all memorized and did it quite quickly. Works the same way as a laptop track pad, can use it without even a thought. I can keep my eyes on the road, the screen is a lot higher up than most cars. Other cars have their screen a lot lower forcing me to look down and take my eyes off the road.

@@ssaini5028 But Acura’s new True Touchpad interface, which serves as the primary control for the infotainment console, drew some fire. “After meandering into a desolate area out of range of any cell service, I tried searching for a ramen place nearby,” daily news editor Conner Golden said. “Five minutes later, I couldn’t make sense of the trackpad-based system, which was overly sensitive and then immediately unresponsive. I gave up and drove toward town until I regained service.” Automobilemag

Android auto as of november 4th was added with the update of the software of the infotainment system

shin888 facts not judgement.

I'm puzzled by this comment. Took two days of driving to become an expert on the infotainment system.

● The system is confusing to use even when the RDX is parked, and it’s very distracting for drivers when the car is moving. For example, they’re forced to look at the screen to execute common audio tasks, and some adjustments are buried deep in submenus. We think it requires too much concentration, multiple steps and extended time with eyes off the road and hand off the wheel. It’s one of the worst systems that we’ve encountered recently. ●Braking performance is strong but the brake pedal has a spongy feel. The suspension quashes most bumps, but we found the ride to be rather firm and choppy. The cabin is quiet, barring a somewhat grainy engine noise. ●We got 22 mpg overall in our tests, which is average for the category, and no better than what we measured with the V6 in the previous-generation RDX. This figure also trails the performance from competitors’ small turbo engines, such as Audi, BMW, and Lexus. ●posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner. ●Most bumps are absorbed well, but the RDX has a jittery feel over rougher roads and on long drives. ●Most of the time the cabin is very quiet, but a coarse engine hum punches through under acceleration. It’s acceptable when driving aggressively, but annoying in everyday driving ●The brake pedal feels as if it isn’t responding at first, and it requires a bit of effort, which can make the driver feel less-than-confident. ●Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin. ●The RDX’s controls are among the worst we’ve experienced. There is a steep learning curve to use the infotainment system, but it is still distracting and confusing to execute common audio functions even after drivers have some familiarity. The system is slow to load after the initial start up.

Jeffrey Twoey Hilarious, Revit up!

Good for you.

lsu205 we dont need “juiced up comments” we need feedback from his driving experience

You think I had the car for a full week and didn't drive it? You must be high?! LOL

You think I had the car for a full week and didn't drive it? You must be high?! LOL

Marlon Williams the white color is more white for the 2020. That’s the only difference. The 2019 is white diamond pearl which is more of an off white pearl. The 2020 is platinum white pearl which is more of a super white color. But you’re right everything else is the same. I wish they had the A-Spec package on the advance trim.

Hey there Marlon, I talk about that in the full video, please watch it all the way through.

Jonathan S Horne wow, wow, wow, wow! :-)

Get Eclipse Cross for half price, you would be surprised 😲 less complicated great features better mpg

The Buick Envision 2.0T is putting down a faster 27.5s figure-8 time vs 2019 CX-5 2.5T and 2019 RDX 2.0T at 27.7 in Motor Trend testing. That continues in an Emergency Lane test by Consumer Reports that has the Envision 2.0T doing 55.5 mph while the CX-5(non-turbo) did 54 mph and the RDX 2.0T can only go 52.5 mph. For 2019 Envision 2.0T gets a new 9-speed and 295 lb-ft of torque, 316 lb-ft of torque on overboost. The twin clutch and torque vectoring AWD is something that Mazda cannot match only able to use brakes on a single on a wheel for torque vectoring. The Hiperstrut, as also seen on Honda Civic Type-R as dual axis strut, eliminates any torque steer under accleration. At a discounted $35K the Envision Prem ll offers heads up display, adaptive high beams and articulating HID, adaptive cruise control with full stopping, tri-zone climate control, sliding rear seat, 12-volt outlet, along with Buick's longer warranty than Mazda.

Drove both. The Mazda does not compare with the 2020 RDX. Guess which one I bought?

GingerCap mazda is crap; not reliable and no torque vectoring...

@@danielmelendez9943 the latest Mazda products (skyactive) are more reliable now than what they were say 10 years ago (when ford owned a large stake in the company) those mazdas were garbage, I agree. Ever since kicking Ford to the curb reliability has increased exponentially. Where do you get tour information from? Scotty Kilmer? (Who has since changed his mind on newer mazda products btw) 😂

GingerCap i owned a 2008 cx7 GT bought new, turbo went dead 2013 at 51k miles, pistons failed too, electrical gremlins. Overall the worst car i ever owned

@@danielmelendez9943 At that time, Ford was in Kahoots with Mazda... sorry about that though, sucks to buy somthing and it be garbage off the lot 😣

Dinu G that’s impossible. How’s your channel doing?

That’s odd because my earnings are up? Maybe you know something I don’t :-)

@@everymandriver I didn't say that to disrespect you. I remember a time when you had alot of views for your videos but now, they are very low. Congrats if you are still doing money or doing "more".

@@EnduranceHour so you answered me with both of your accounts? Lol 👍

Everyman Driver Great reply! Been watching you for a while.....keep going! Let the haters hate.

False. Black Bear

I have a 2020 with none of the problems you cite above.

Which trim do you have?

@@reddz80 Advance Package.

Stephen Jones you’re so funny, I appreciate a person with a sense of humor, I can tell that you’re just being funny and not trying to be offensive, critical or rude. Have a great day.

False. Black Bear