Fastest Military Aircraft Above Mach 2 Top Speed Comparison 3D
Рет қаралды 8,161,810
2 жыл бұрынSR-71 Blackbird is NOT the fastest.
44 fastest military aircraft above Mach 2 Top Speed Comparison 3D
Featuring
B-58 Hustler
Saab 35 Draken
Chengdu J-7
Eurofighter Typhoon
Chengdu J-20
F-16
Tupolev Tu-160
MiG-21
Saab 37 Viggen
Shenyang J-11
Sukhoi Su-57
BAC TSR2
Panavia Tornado ADV
Mirage 2000
F-104 Starfighter
Chengdu J-10
Northrop YF-23
Sukhoi Su-47
F-4 Phantom II
Mikoyan MiG-35
F-22 Raptor
Sukhoi Su-35
F-107 Ultra Sabre
MiG-29 Fulcrum
Lightning
F-106 Delta Dart
MiG-23 Flogger
Sukhoi Su-27
F-14 Tomcat
Shenyang J-8
F-111 Aardvark
Chengdu J-20
F-15 Eagle
MiG-31 Foxhound
XB-70 Valkyrie
Bell X-2 Starbuster
MiG-25 Foxbat
SR-71 Blackbird
Lockheed A-12
MiG-41
X-51 Waverider
Skylon
SR-72
HSTDV
X-15
NASA X-43A
SHEFEX
Avangard
𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂
Whitesand - Vision- Inspirational Piano Music
Whitesand - Fireflies 2
Whitesand - My Spirit Is Free
Check out Whitesand Channel
/ whitesandcomposer
𝟑𝐃 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬
- own creations
- 3D Warehouse (Awesome)
Per section 1.B.ii of the 3D Warehouse TOC - "Combined Work"
Like, Share and Subscribe to 𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝘇
www.amazingviz.net/
Help me Grow this Channel
@chief5640 Жыл бұрын
He leaked top gun lol
@UhDoggo_ Жыл бұрын
He really did lol (I was searching for dark star from top gun and found this)
@user-tx6kn2qm6o Жыл бұрын
watched it yesterday, incredible movie
@alvinhtm2906 Жыл бұрын
you mean the SR-72 sir?
@solomonirailoa Жыл бұрын
Damn, you're right. 7:03
@99nozy Жыл бұрын
He did!
@julianholland7204 2 жыл бұрын
The faster they get ,the more they look like my paper airplane designs from primary school.
@SurprisinglyDynamicAnimeSideC 2 жыл бұрын
Everything goes full circle eventually
@swegmastur614 2 жыл бұрын
You had something figured out then lol
@patrickorjaliza9174 2 жыл бұрын
Your paper plane move slow
@julianholland7204 2 жыл бұрын
@@patrickorjaliza9174 nah man,fast and straight like an arrow.However now I think about it there was another design that was popular that looked entirely different to the other designs getting banded about that went for speed and distance.This other design (all were copied off friends) looked short and had a broad nose and went for a loopy slow flight.ahh the memories and hours spent.
@maxmaaz 2 жыл бұрын
7:58 this one 😆
@Labgorilla 2 жыл бұрын
This shows just how much ahead of their time engineers from the 50s and 60s were. Golden age for aircraft.
@universal5459 2 жыл бұрын
i completely agree,
@drkies 2 жыл бұрын
Unless, of course, our advanced modern designs are not being disclosed for public consumption.
@nickkowalski1978 2 жыл бұрын
@@drkies super fast planes were used for reconnaissance, we now just use satellites.
@wingnut6472 2 жыл бұрын
Aliens helped
@imdjc4 2 жыл бұрын
And for many other things too....cars, entertainment, people, etc.
@77dris 2 жыл бұрын
The funny thing is, when it comes to combat, aircraft almost NEVER go supersonic. That's why the newest, most expensive fighters are actually slower than those from the 70's. Studies were done on battles during the Korean war and 0% of combat situations ever were done above mach 1. Even getting to and from fights high speed was rarely used because it destroyed fuel consumption.
@PlayshotKalo 2 жыл бұрын
The real threat for combat aircraft is ground AA. Even if all in flight combat isn't above Mach 1, having the ability to out maneuver and outrun ground to air missiles is a valuable ability in combat aircraft
@Minh-Tran-04 Жыл бұрын
Bruh the study was from Vietnam showing that F-4s fly mostly subsonic and sometimes reach Mach 1.2 during combat. There was no supersonic jets in Korea
@Hollycalvey Жыл бұрын
there were no supersonic jet fighters during the korean war... aircraft getting slower isn't because reaching mach 2 is useless, but there's more of a focus on ensuring aircraft can "supercruise" aka reach supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners. reaching mach 1.5 without afterburners is a lot more useful than mach 2 with afterburners
@daddyo1176 Жыл бұрын
I believe the ability to turn a tight circle is the biggest advantage in a dogfight which is why fighters have vectored thrust now. The Japanese zero was a good example of this. British and American pilots were trained not to get into these types of maneuvers with a zero because the zero would always end up behind them.
@Hollycalvey Жыл бұрын
@@daddyo1176 jets haven’t had a focus on dogfighting ability since the 50’s
@antoniomv9444 2 жыл бұрын
I love how a human was the pilot of a thing that was almost seven times the speed of sound 60 YEARS AGO.
@e30kitty 2 жыл бұрын
7 times the speed of sound is a lot for an airplane but it's nothing if you compare it to the speed of the rocket boosters that is flying towar space :D
@gunner4ever924 2 жыл бұрын
Lmao, that's merely a dumb deduction. Scientists today realized that there are things more important than just speed to the aircraft.
@makabrax 2 жыл бұрын
It's also the fact the main principle changed, first they needed to go further, then higher, then faster, but the moment the anti air missiles made it all more or less useless, (and the general advance of rockets as carriers of nuclear warheads) they went back to fuel economy, better maneuvering and 'stealth'
@crazyfroggie6546 2 жыл бұрын
All the pilot did was hit the rockets ignition switches, after that he was just a passenger
@coolyoutubename16 2 жыл бұрын
@@crazyfroggie6546 he still flew horizontally at Mach 6.7. that's insane
@rizkifajarfirdaus9123 2 жыл бұрын
6:34 Origin: Rusia First flight: ASK PUTIN Well, fair enough
@Thbenjaminsson 2 жыл бұрын
Well, you might as well ask the Holy Lord himself, as it is rather obvious that Mister Putin believe that he (Putin) plays in the same kind of league.. 😸😸 - 😉😉 - 😸😸 Th. Benjaminsson in Sweden - - - 🇸🇪🇸🇪 - 🇪🇺🇪🇺 - - -
@psychohist 2 жыл бұрын
Actually, including future aircraft was stupid. Half these aircraft will never fly.
@Thbenjaminsson 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is undoubtedly true - but, regarding "Estimated" Top Speed Cabability of a certain Jet Fighter or comparable aircraft is always a mindbuggling work - what can be concidered being absolutely uncompromisingly correct in all imaginable situations? Th. Benjaminsson - Sweden * 🇸🇪 * 🇸🇪 *
@Daan_DV 2 жыл бұрын
First flight is expected in 2025.
@czerbniak75 2 жыл бұрын
@@Daan_DV Putin said- Middle of the 20's. Ramjet.
@_lengthylimbs Жыл бұрын
SR 71 has got to be one of the most futuristic looking jets to exist
@texasforever7887 Ай бұрын
The XB-70 Valkyrie has the SR-71 beat in the futuristic category. It looks like something straight out of the Imperial fleet in Star Wars.
@saynotokaren9904 2 жыл бұрын
The F-4 was was ahead of it's time for it's all around capabilities. Incredible service life.
@earl2688 Жыл бұрын
Mach 2+ in 1958 was so far ahead of its time that it took 50 years to retire it! I worked fire control on most of the N/J/S models.
@yoshimitsu1260 2 ай бұрын
@@earl2688 Going mach 2.2 isn't really "being so far ahead of its time" considering Mig21 was made 3 years before and it could reach a top speed of 2.1 already. Going at mach 0.10 or 0.15 faster isn't that huge of an "innovation".
@Kune35 2 жыл бұрын
Fun how the Blackbird was actually designed to leak fuel like a sieve while on the ground, and had to actively be fueled right up till takeoff. To keep the all-metal construction from tearing itself apart mid-flight, it was built with loose tolerances so that the heat of high speed flight would cause the metal parts to expand and seal themselves back up. They actually had to refuel midair right after takeoff because they used lightweight landing gear to save weight that couldn't handle a full fuel load. They had to make sure everything was operating smoothly after takeoff before they refueled because it wouldn't survive landing with a full load.
@Protein33 2 жыл бұрын
We saw the video thanks.
@thomasjust2663 2 жыл бұрын
Just imagine how many people would get healthcare with the money spent on development this apparatus!
@manasbhadauria2935 2 жыл бұрын
Miracle of engineering
@10monfort 2 жыл бұрын
@@Protein33 that wasnt in the video...
@ohitsrusher842 2 жыл бұрын
@@Protein33 Your eyes must have been closed because that wasn't in the video
@8Fist 2 жыл бұрын
Lol MiG-41 First flight: ask Putin. Nice job lol, that made me laugh
@Otpevatel 2 жыл бұрын
лет через 8 я его увижу ;)
@_Vinter_ 2 жыл бұрын
@@Otpevatel Он уже есть и летал. Только в 1 экземпляре. Просто это лишком секретно, так как сам понимаешь- Гиперзвуковой истребитель..... У нас есть ещё один интересный истребитель "Чёрная чума", о нём тоже почти ничего не известно, только то, что он патрулирует Арктику.
@8Fist 2 жыл бұрын
@@_Vinter_ i dont speak russian
@sagard.yenchilwar1379 2 жыл бұрын
@@_Vinter_ Privyet
@sagard.yenchilwar1379 2 жыл бұрын
@@8Fist I guess this means hello
@zhenghe2849 2 жыл бұрын
The issue here is that with the exception of the SR-71 and perhaps the Mig 31, none of these speeds are cruising speeds. They are just the maximum speeds at the right altitude that can be maintained for 1 or 2 minutes at most.
@Jusuff Жыл бұрын
The Foxbat could do Mach 3+ but it destroyed it's engines in the process so it's maximum safe speed is around mach 2.8, the same as the Foxhound
@seekerpro486 Жыл бұрын
there was a reason pilots for the SR-71 had to wear spacesuits.
@wertushka2715 Жыл бұрын
@@seekerpro486 mig 31 and 25 pilots also wore spacesuits (light)
@fanman421 2 жыл бұрын
The ‘published’ max for the F15 is 2.5 yet there is a safety wired switch labeled ‘VMAX’ in the cockpit that raises some of the limits on the engines and airframe that will allow it to move quite a bit faster. If the safety wire is broken, testing must be done to ensure continued serviceability.
@kinkusdudeus 11 ай бұрын
FYI the F 15-A was a mach 5+ fighter. Been there done that twice...
@fanman421 11 ай бұрын
@@kinkusdudeus Really.... I worked on them for over 7 years.... did you fly them? I knew several that did. And worked on all the avionics and instrumentation. NEXT ?
@kinkusdudeus 11 ай бұрын
@@fanman421 I was an O T & E crew chief.
@fanman421 11 ай бұрын
@@kinkusdudeus Yeah, I was part of the operational test of first of the A’s and B’s at Luke AFB, 58 TFW, Then the first NATO deployment of two squadrons of B’s. Many good memories at both bases. I would imagine there were many times you pushed the button on the failed unit indicator panel in the nose wheel well, and called out 081, 041, and 022, to be pulled for test and repair. When they were delivered to the shop, the guys would connect them to the test stations to check them out and replace parts as needed. My AFSC, 32670, Integrated Avionics Aerospace Ground Equipment Specialist, was for maintenance of the test equipment itself. The tech school for that was 9 months long at Lowery in Denver. 😉
@kinkusdudeus 11 ай бұрын
@@fanman421 Yeah those damn buttons. When were you at Luke? I had the joy of working on 74-111 for Fred when nobody else could make that broken pos flight worthy. I stole new engines from the engine shop and would swap them out the night before he was going to fly so he had good engines. And steal radar parts and any avionics that had failed also. Anything to make it fly.
@troyezell5841 2 жыл бұрын
I love the Mig 41 "Origi: Russia" "First flight: Ask Putin" Hilarious! 🤣
@Pekokakko 2 жыл бұрын
Hey! Don't laugh! If mr. Putain said so it must be true 😡🥳
@rocky3525 2 жыл бұрын
Ya 🤣🤣🤣
@mihail3588 2 жыл бұрын
Не обольщайся. Скоро премьера. Записывайся на тест-драйв. P.S.: Если не трус, конешно.
@kevinpiltz7922 2 жыл бұрын
@@Pekokakko q.q..
@user-cg9dw2cb3k 2 жыл бұрын
@@mihail3588 пфф. Мультики как всегда?
@harryblackburn9556 2 жыл бұрын
The SR-71's true top speed was and still is classified at mach 3.2+. Remember the airstrike on Libya in 86? The pilots exceeded mach 3.2 when some SAM's were fired at it. I remember one saying they were approaching mach 4 when they throttled back. I was stationed at The Blue Cube at the Satellite control facility in Sunnyvale, Ca.at that time and we were in contact with JCS and HQ USAF during that mission. Can't hit it if you can't see or catch it.
@coolcat6303 2 жыл бұрын
That’s exactly right. Also very cool that you got to witness it as it was happening.
@ryanknoup6288 2 жыл бұрын
Idolized the SR-71 when I was a kid. I built many jet models and would hang them from my bedroom ceiling. The SR was one of my favorites as well as the F-4 and F-14. Of course Top Gun is still the best movie ever made.
@MJ-nb1qn 2 жыл бұрын
The man who gave the orders for the Libya air strike was a patient of mine. He told me the “real story”!
@TheMartuksxxxx 2 жыл бұрын
Altho the manual for SR-21 is in public domain
@engenheirodofuturo1802 2 жыл бұрын
A velocidade máxima relatada em um Blackbird é de MACH 3.9.
@jbdub08 Жыл бұрын
People don't realize how fast the F14 Tomcats were. In a straight line, they'll blow the doors off of all but a handful of the fastest modern jets. Their twin Gen Elec F110 afterburners could produce around 125 kN of thrust EACH.
@jasonjanes3256 10 ай бұрын
agreed - what an amazing aircraft, clearly ahead in so many ways, I was blown away to learn it was developed and sketched in the 60/70's ?
@adityarajkar7534 Жыл бұрын
*MiG-41* First flight: Ask Putin Sure, the next time we catch up for Vodka i will remember to ask
@internetisinteresting7720 2 жыл бұрын
The mig-25 is old and still is impressive the things it can do
@dannyzero692 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine what it could’ve been if the Soviet made a higher quality variant of it that doesn’t made out of nickel steel alloy and engines that didn’t last just around 150 hours. Sure as an interceptor it really does not need high maneuverability but those weight reduction could’ve pushed the aircraft even faster.
@internetisinteresting7720 2 жыл бұрын
@@dannyzero692 that's the MIG-31, another "a lot of records" breaker plane, that is the actual interceptor of Russia
@internetisinteresting7720 2 жыл бұрын
@@dannyzero692 adding to my last comment, the MIG-31 has since it's introduction 1975 some stuff that where new and introduced today planes like targeting enemy planes for your group or guiding allied misiles shot, a navegation computer (Rita) that talk to the pilot. The mig-31 has been modernized several times with newest radars, engines, sensors, led screen interfaces, with the newest sensors it's the chassis of a 1975 plane that reach match 3.5 and reach altitudes of 123500feet. Search mustard KZfaq channel and his video about the MiG-25, at the end he talks about the mig-31
@PNSHDSako Жыл бұрын
@@internetisinteresting7720 The 25 was an interceptor as well, and was official until the 31 took its place. The engines used were R-15-300s, which were limited use, missile engines, rather than dedicated jet engines. And yes, the 25 also had low maneuverability due to the heavy, structural wings and heavy material choice. The 31 corrected a lot of these issues
@Jusuff Жыл бұрын
@@dannyzero692 a long way to describe the MiG-31
@davidwaggoner2925 2 жыл бұрын
Notably, you missed the North American A/RA-5 in your list of military aircraft capable of Mach 2.0+ speed at 40,000 feet. On 13 December 1960, an A3J variant set the world altitude record of 91,450.8 feet (27,874.2 m), carrying a 1000 kilogram payload. According to Wikipedia and other sources, the crew, Navy Cmdr. Leroy Heath, pilot, and Lt. Larry Monroe, navigator/bombardier, accelerated the Vigilante to Mach 2.1 and then flew upward in a ballistic trajectory until the engines flamed out. At the top of the arc it rolled on its back and nosed down. Heath righted the aircraft and restarted the engines. They landed safely.
@DrRaccoon-ux9gq Жыл бұрын
They also mussed the MIG-25 Foxbat, literally the fastest fighter craft ever made
@Jusuff Жыл бұрын
@@DrRaccoon-ux9gq 6:07
@waltrwhit Жыл бұрын
russia best
@fredriksvensson6030 8 ай бұрын
I love when it goes over the top - like the x-51 at mach 5+ with a guy riding it like a horse! :)
@AmazingViz 8 ай бұрын
Oh yeah!
@Thexakatron Жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The US has actually breached mach 31. Its called Apollo 11. They reentered at 24 thousand MPH. Although, we have gone even faster. We have gotten up to just under mach 38.5 with the Stardust return capsule. Yeah. Rockets go REALLY fast.
@Astrix_Jaeger 2 жыл бұрын
"Have you seen the Black Bird in flight?" Of course not that's like going in the speed of a bullet but times 3.5 Me: "of course not, It was 1965"
@frankcrawford416 2 жыл бұрын
I wish we would have seen it from the outside at 85,000 feet passing something slower and then video from behind of the colossal engines in full ramjet mode.
@journeyquest1 2 жыл бұрын
I sat in one and saw it fly at Norton AFB.
@ls200076 2 жыл бұрын
@@journeyquest1 Kkomrade o7
@RandomPerson8 2 жыл бұрын
He actually meant a bird
@chucknorris277 2 жыл бұрын
They got one on display in Georgia. Absolutely beutiful
@randoliof 2 жыл бұрын
The F15 model you used was my unit's flagship plane. Very cool to see the 173FW represented in one of your videos!
@AmazingViz 2 жыл бұрын
Very cool!!!
@GloopSerious-nt9dv 2 жыл бұрын
Were you part of 1999. mission over Yugoslavia?
@XxSoGRAMBOxX 2 жыл бұрын
Do you know if the f15 or 16 were stealthy on radar. The f16 is labeled as a stealth in the video and I've never known anything about that
@seantaggart7382 2 жыл бұрын
@@XxSoGRAMBOxX wow
@IgnarHusky 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like they're stationed in Oregon? The inside of the tail looks like the State of Oregon
@kingtigerbooks1162 2 жыл бұрын
The SR-71 is my favorite aircraft. Maybe not as heavily armed as the Eagle but it's gonna sneak up on them MiGs real quiet like and shoot them with its camera. My neighbor is an old F-4 Phantom pilot. He saw a little action in Vietnam. I keep telling him to write a book. He had his share of close calls and narrow escapes from MiGs. These are my 3 favorite aviation books: - Her Majesty's Top Gun by Sharkey Ward - Phantom II by Val Ross Johnson - Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
@pavelbee-2721 8 ай бұрын
Lol russia entered the chat
@darshansangawar5471 Жыл бұрын
Proud to see India in top 5 of the list.... Jay Hind 💫🇮🇳
@Astrix_Jaeger 2 жыл бұрын
" *Drops a tiny screw* " *GONE TO A DIFFERENT DIMENSION* Now that's speed.
@madmaxdhama4589 2 жыл бұрын
Proud to see an Indian program in top class , 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@kibathemechanic4967 9 ай бұрын
Despite what Mother Russia and her army of fanboys say, the Su-57 Felon IS NOT a 5th-Gen or stealth aircraft. It has no RAM coatings, the engine fan blades are completely visible to radar, its avionics are about a decade behind the West's, and some panel gaps are big enough to fit your hand through. At best, it is only a low-observable 4.5-Gen fighter that doesn't even have the numbers to equip a single squadron.
@user-lo7wy8sg2x Ай бұрын
It’s very funny to read such “serious” arguments from people who will never even touch these machines in their lives.) The F-22 is extremely effective in the fight against hillbillies in sandals. And for the current confrontation with “Patriots”, “Leopards”, “Bradleys” and other “progressive” trinkets, there are enough aircraft developed in the 70-80s.) My favorite thing is stealth technology, which can only be speculated about since it has not yet been possible to test the claimed invisibility. Although no, the 1961 S-125 missile did not know about invisibility and RAM coating and shot down the F-117)
@Z.O.M.G Жыл бұрын
I just learned of the Skylon SSTO with this video and as a Kerbal Space Program fan, I am very excited to see something like this exists
@GopherBaroque61 2 жыл бұрын
The SR-71 is still my favorite. Nothing you can say will change my mind.
@Dynamo001 2 жыл бұрын
You know it's badass if the X-Men use one for their main transport vehicle.
@bobstringer9809 2 жыл бұрын
SR-72
@krazykraka777 2 жыл бұрын
I remember hearing SR-71 pilot Brian Shul get asked how fast the plane could really go and and he just chuckled and said "faster than the book says it can."
@LMcGearty 2 жыл бұрын
Little known fact but it was meant to be the RS71, but they made a typo and stuck with SR71.
@ChaplainDaveSparks 2 жыл бұрын
Nice, if not very maneuverable...
@instantnudles 2 жыл бұрын
*Sees J-20 twice* Me: Confused screaming
@AmazingViz 2 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁
@julwiezdeghorz5089 2 жыл бұрын
There were two versions of the J20, the fast and faster J20. Lol.
@Gongolongo 2 жыл бұрын
There are two versions, one with the AL-31 saturn (prototype and initial production) and the faster one with WS-10A (current production). I didn't see the second J-20 so I don't know if it's accurate.
@julwiezdeghorz5089 2 жыл бұрын
@@Gongolongo Take a look again. Pls. 😊
@signs80 2 жыл бұрын
@@Gongolongo I can't see the WS-10 being faster when the WS-10A has lower thrust than the AL-31F in the J-20
@midnattsol6207 Жыл бұрын
0:50 J-20 goes Mach 2.0 5:20 J-20 goes Mach 2.5 such acceleration!
@itsmemckee2110 Жыл бұрын
So SR71 being that fast in 1964,just imagine what they're hiding from us in 2022.
@CommodoreFloopjack78 2 жыл бұрын
I love the little character cameos, those are a nice touch.👍
@supercheese905 2 жыл бұрын
agreed 🛩
@CommodoreFloopjack78 2 жыл бұрын
@@supercheese905 👍👍👍
@joaobranco2164 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing that after all these years, the X-15 still rules supreme... Above that, only unmanned. Missiles should've not been included in this video, not exactly "aircraft", and they only fly once... But since we include suborbital vehicles we should include the Space Shuttle (Mach 28) ate the top of the list, and it is a crewed aircraft.
@silaskuemmerle2505 2 жыл бұрын
I would say that technology demonstrators like the X-43 count
@MAGGOT_VOMIT 2 жыл бұрын
So the Chinese claim. LOL!! India? They can't even pick up their trash they scattered all over the Moon. 😆😂🤣
@SUNDARAN.. 2 жыл бұрын
Hey you from which country
@masterpooshi6031 2 жыл бұрын
@@SUNDARAN.. China.
@viswajitbala7924 2 жыл бұрын
@@MAGGOT_VOMIT I don't know if you're trying to trigger any Indians, but one thing I must say is that China is no better than anything :)
@baporxx5733 Жыл бұрын
VIDEO HELPED ME OUT ALOT!!! KEEP THE CONTENT COMING!!!
@freespeechisdead1565 2 жыл бұрын
You forgot Mach 33: Me when my girlfriend's husband gets home.
@max-mg7gk 2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes the MiG-31, my favorite speedy boi
@riccccccardo 2 жыл бұрын
Ahhh yes ekpic plane made to chase the sr1/blackbird.
@retardmoguss 2 жыл бұрын
@@riccccccardo the mig-25 was the speedier boi, chasing blackbirds
@kingofallgodzillas9901 2 жыл бұрын
Mine is mig-29 cus of how cool it looks
@retardmoguss 2 жыл бұрын
@@kingofallgodzillas9901 yeah mig-29 is hella sexy. Heck, every fucking russian aircraft looks hella sexy. Maybe not the mig-21 but everything else for sure.
@andrewdoesyt7787 2 жыл бұрын
Nah, X15.
@bishalsen6850 2 жыл бұрын
4:41 Maverick. Goose "Top Gun" 🔥🔥
@LordHolley Жыл бұрын
That was fun to watch, thanks for making it.
@mosessumit7757 2 жыл бұрын
Less politics will make your video better.
@bandit327 2 жыл бұрын
People want to be fast, but sometimes you must stop to see real beauty... or video like this 😉
@StormFox_1 2 жыл бұрын
Bandit where is my fucking cocaine.
@bandit327 2 жыл бұрын
@@StormFox_1 uhhhh... Drugs? I dont know, man. Where did you buy it? Maybe, you should ask your dealer... Auf Wiedersehen
@StormFox_1 2 жыл бұрын
@@bandit327 You are my dealer damn it.
@irrelevant9023 2 жыл бұрын
This comment is so.. Cringe
@fgialcgorge7392 2 жыл бұрын
Okay fortune cookie Maverick
@thelzorakee4549 2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, the F-16 stealth air superiority fighter
@shallnotcomply6479 2 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the most unstealthy stealth fighter
@plutonium8879 2 жыл бұрын
1974 technology in modern age global aerospace technology.....garbage. Meanwhile, record military budgets, more than any other nation.
@bighands69 2 жыл бұрын
@@plutonium8879 US aircraft from the 1960s cannot even be matched by other nations today. There is a reason why the US has twice as many fighter aircraft as the Russians and Chinese combined. The US welfare state costs 2.5 trillion per year and the military budget is nothing compared to it.
@ZappakeR 2 жыл бұрын
Lol ikr
@Jester_The_Jynxster 2 жыл бұрын
@Cody Mcconnell The maker of these videos is obviously either russian, or a russian jet fanboy. Saying that a study in 2008 found that each Su-35 (from the 80s) could shoot down 2.4 F-35s? And most other american planes say little more than "was fast", "made a lot of them", or have some mostly negative connotation about it. The F-14 for example "with wings swept back it could make the mach 2.4 speed requirement set by the navy". Or the SR-71 "Could only be flown once per week because of the heavy maintenance. Often came back with rivets and parts missing". Because those are clearly the most interesting facts about those aircraft.... But yet almost every russian made aircraft has some.fact about it basically being better than some western made plane, other otherwise states how more better than everything else it is. LMAO
@rzmonk76 Жыл бұрын
7:57 Love the Mr. Putin with his shirt off next to a bottle of vodka.
@lazypackhk7623 Жыл бұрын
they want Mach 10?then give them Mach 10.
@zehanazani6946 Жыл бұрын
Hahahaha 🤣 you spoil top gun maverick
@enyotheios2613 2 жыл бұрын
Great to see these visualized and their history summary given! However... I don't usually think of the F-16 as "Stealth"...
@Hanumansapprentice Жыл бұрын
Ground breaking avionics but it having stealth capabilities slipped by me also👍
@zkspanz 2 жыл бұрын
Pity the Avro Arrow was canned before it was allowed to set records. It was going to be comfortably a Mach 2.5 plane and was heading into the Mach 3 brigade.
@matthewdavies2057 2 жыл бұрын
Only Canadians care.
@CyrusdVulture 2 жыл бұрын
@@matthewdavies2057 Yes, Canadians do care, because the cancellation of the Arrow gutted their entire aerospace industry and destroyed a huge amount of technological design in Canada.
@haitolawrence5986 2 жыл бұрын
@@CyrusdVulture I'm Canadian and it does get tiresome. Nobody is stopping us from getting back in to aviation in a big way...oh wait we had that federal election a few days ago. 😏
@lukeeinwechter2159 2 жыл бұрын
@@CyrusdVulture agreed. All our talent went to the Americans and the Brits fostering the biggest increase in aerospace technologies. Just not in Canada. Thanks Diefenbaker.
@dougcarroll7001 2 жыл бұрын
A lot the engineers went to Nasa furthering the space race
@arthurprogamer6177 Жыл бұрын
Admit it, You guys came here after watching TOP GUN: Maverick to see how fast is a F-14 and a F-22 Raptor
@TamaSquad 7 ай бұрын
Calling the Su-57 a fifth gen fighter is like calling a vegan burger a burger
@GBLynden 2 жыл бұрын
Another great job! It seems like the schemes you like to use are similar to current RC Plane models (Arrows F-15 for example) 👊🏻💥👊🏻
@mikemosley535 2 жыл бұрын
The X15 was flown in 1959 at Mach 6. Think about that. It was manned. They had no clue what Mach 6 would do to a person.
@mannywildegibbons1177 2 жыл бұрын
And just two years later they launched a dude all the way to orbit. Crazy shit.
@ianthompson2802 2 жыл бұрын
What I wouldn't do to be a fly on the wall when they were briefing the piolet
@Nick-tm2sw 2 жыл бұрын
That knew what mach 6 would do to a person, nothing. Its not velocity that is a problem for humans, its acceleration. Right now you are moving at over 1000 mph because of Earth moving but you don't notice it. Velocity doesn't harm people. You must watch too many movies.
@mikemosley535 2 жыл бұрын
@@Nick-tm2sw So you’re telling me he started flying at Mach 6??? Or did he have to accelerate to Mach 6??? Per your words.. Acceleration is the issue. At best he started at Mach 1. Still needed to go thru 5 more Mach levels. Did they have the flight suits they do today to compress blood to keep form blackout??
@ilmevavi1112 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikemosley535 the problem is the sudden change in velocity not the top speed. Sitting in a plane going mach 6 would feel no different than one going 500km/h.
@Capy4566 11 күн бұрын
Every one says that the X-15 is the fastest but no, the SR-71 is the fastest AIRPLANE, so that declairs it the fastest because the X-15 is a rocket engine
@BillyBadson0795 Жыл бұрын
SR-72 could reach Mach 10 flying by Maverick
@NKBobcat 2 жыл бұрын
You forgot the aircraft for which I served as a Plane Captain on in the US Navy. The RA-5C Vigilante was a high-altitude Mach 2.1 reconnaissance aircraft that began as a high-speed nuclear bomber. It served from 1961-1979.
@GodBeluga 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for using my aircraft
@logan5326 2 жыл бұрын
Cool story bro! 👍🏻
@RedBeardBookie 2 жыл бұрын
who asked
@NKBobcat 2 жыл бұрын
@@RedBeardBookie Sorry. I forgot to ask your permission. Next time I will.
@DirkDeadeye_ 2 жыл бұрын
Hey what about the The RA-5C Vigilante?
@jonathanfischer5292 2 жыл бұрын
Nice vid! One small point: The single-seat A12 did not have those notches in the chines up by the nose. It's the YF-12 interceptor that had those notches.
@jerzeyguy71 Жыл бұрын
SR-71 blackbird always been my fav!! but seeing the father of the Blackbird, never saw that before!! I have to look up that history!
@Sycfinn Жыл бұрын
Imagine what the U.S. has now that we just don’t know about 😧
@kgill99 2 жыл бұрын
They kind of wrecked this by -putting in planes that haven’t even been built -and some sort of glide vehicle that fundamentally doesn’t even fly, it’s simply controls it’s drop, like a fancy brick. - And the X43A data is quite misleading, it takes a plane and a booster to get it high where the air is thin and then when there it flips on its engines and though it goes very fast this only lasts for 10 seconds before the engine dies and then it begins to glide and eventually crash land in the ocean…is this really a plane? Really confuses the video and devalues it.
@filanfyretracker 2 жыл бұрын
I mean yeah if gliding things are valid, the Space Shuttle Orbiter beats them all its wings taste atmosphere when its still going 22x sound.
@shinji5217 2 жыл бұрын
@@filanfyretracker military
@jj4791 2 жыл бұрын
I vote the U.S.S. Enterprise (not the carrier). Warp-9 ftw.
@tankpenguin175 2 жыл бұрын
@@shinji5217 The STS way very military-focused.
@shinji5217 2 жыл бұрын
@@tankpenguin175 is et
@kato_dsrdr 2 жыл бұрын
Just reminding that the first airplane is invented just 100 years ago.. I remember watching a video where people thought that it's probably impossible to break the sound barrier yet here we are, casually going supersonic..
@dylan-5287 2 жыл бұрын
And to think, supersonic is now boring. All about the hypersonic lol.
@jasonjanes3256 10 ай бұрын
@@dylan-5287 i know - high hypersonic
@lilbitz17 2 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing how much war pushes innovation
@outlawx720 2 жыл бұрын
It may seem like they were way ahead in the 60s and 70s. Imagine seeing what what is classified in modern aircraft.
@scheimong 2 жыл бұрын
After all this time I still love the look of YF23 and SU47.
@crackedemerald4930 2 жыл бұрын
YF-23 is at 2:46
@areus2016 2 жыл бұрын
They are wacky in design but look hella cool. What pretty cool is that Putin himself flew in the su-47. Yes, one of the most important people on the planet flew in an experimental aircraft.
@Femboy_Lover 2 жыл бұрын
Be funny if it just scrolled over a random ass X-Wing out of nowhere.
@martinirvine4232 9 ай бұрын
No matter how fast a jet or rocket goes, it will never beat the nuclear propelled manhole cover
@Brandon84J 2 жыл бұрын
My 2 very favorite plans in existance are the F-4 Phantom and the A-10 Warthog/Thunderbolt. Beautiful planes... My dad was on the USS Constellation, and it was the first aircraft carrier deck to ever launch an F-4 Phantom... He's proud of that one
@Brandon84J 2 жыл бұрын
@Freddie Bloggs lol that's what everyone says, but I think it's a damn sexy looking plane. I love it man
@captainkirkchevnomo Жыл бұрын
US Marine Corps. I served in all three Marine Air Wings. Phantoms will forever be my favorite combat aircraft. The Harrier is a strong second place and in third is the A-4 Skyhawk. Both were the kings of Marine close air support in their day.
@Timmyfromphilly1994 2 жыл бұрын
6:55 love the Empire logo on the wing 😂
@couttsw 2 жыл бұрын
Lets talk about actual aircraft not pipe dreams, until it flys, the MIG41 is a pipe dream.
@mrscreamer379 2 жыл бұрын
Add the scam that is Skylon to that list as well.
@khongkhung79 2 жыл бұрын
Did you ask Putin?
@danielmayfield8262 2 жыл бұрын
@@INdaURETRA The X-15 was man controlled?
@Whoooan 2 жыл бұрын
@@danielmayfield8262 Somehow yes it was
@budyeddi5814 2 жыл бұрын
@@danielmayfield8262 *Yes.*
@chrisniedo9544 2 жыл бұрын
Off the subject but am wondering who made the melodies in the back ground ?
@lucasferreira2073 Жыл бұрын
The Mig 25 Foxbat is just a engineering miracle, what an aircraft...
@darkguitarist3476 9 ай бұрын
123k ft altitude that's insane for a soviet era airplane.
@lucasferreira2073 9 ай бұрын
@@darkguitarist3476 And those limitless Rockets only capped by fuel lol
@petersmythe6462 2 жыл бұрын
"pure glide vehicle" ok. So is the Buran and the Space shuttle. The latter of which was designed to military spec and for military purpose.
@Can_E_ 2 жыл бұрын
Buran was powered
@MostlyPennyCat 2 жыл бұрын
@@Can_E_ only on the way up. Both shuttles glided back.
@t.d.phillips7283 2 жыл бұрын
I imagine the X37B falls in this category also... The speeds obtain are beyond human endurance... The Space Shuttle was a remarkable vehicle in its own right...
@MostlyPennyCat 2 жыл бұрын
@@t.d.phillips7283 It's not speed that can get beyond our endurance, it's acceleration. Skylon probably won't be built as is post spacex but that was going to be human rated and it's orbital sprint is Mach 5 to Mach 25. Which'll certainly put a smile on your face, regardless.
@t.d.phillips7283 2 жыл бұрын
@@MostlyPennyCat with acceleration like that I wouldn't worry about the smile on my face as much as the residue in my lower suit...
@kerbalairforce8802 2 жыл бұрын
Reminder that Blackbirds top speed is still classified, and people who worked on it laugh at videos like this.
@SgtSteel1 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed.
@zerocapacitance1 2 жыл бұрын
WHAT SOFTWARE DID YOU USE?
@doozledorf7036 2 жыл бұрын
Can't fool me by putting a missile and a glide vehicle ahead of the X-15. You just didn't want an American aircraft to be number 1 huh? It is though, and we all see that.
@jophussaurus2450 2 жыл бұрын
Yep! I noticed that too
@joeblowe7872 2 жыл бұрын
Straight up, these lists always try to downplay US accomplishments and it's so weird...
@siddiqgamesyt3354 2 жыл бұрын
To be fair the X-15 isn't even a true plane, it got launched off a carrier then reached that high speed, same with that rocket and that 2 megaton 20,000 mph highly maneuverable overpowered glider
@arahok7675 2 жыл бұрын
so, if is not amercian not count? don't try, if the americans build a glide or missile that runs fast like this, people like you would make the greatest scandal of all times. americanist aways complaining about nonsense, CHILDISH!!!
@arahok7675 2 жыл бұрын
by X-15 and X-43 being in the list, even X-43 with controversial information was included without question, also even though both are not airplanes, this video was very friendly to americans. btw, i'm not from rus or usa, 'm watching the fight from outside and your complaint is pretty pointless, a lot.
@sp-tj9ye 2 жыл бұрын
@7:21, congratulations DRDO👍 Jai Hind 🙏🇮🇳
@johnpaquette4566 2 жыл бұрын
Ok am I the only one that spotted Ironman hanging onto the f22 wing? 😂😂 @3:24
@MrTangent 2 жыл бұрын
Nope. But you missed Hulk at 03:06.
@punonn6792 Жыл бұрын
Bro, thanks for putting in the F-16 with Singapore camo 👍
@markdrt9678 Жыл бұрын
Pov: you watched this video after watching TopGun. Leave a like 😎
@kpaburaj4246 2 жыл бұрын
I am an Indian pilot, I have traveled a lot of fighter aircraft in my life, but what I saw is power and speed and dread, only Rafale is a very dangerous fighter aircraft.
@russelbrown7303 2 жыл бұрын
Dont have to be fast if you cant see me the Raptor
@derekwalker4622 2 жыл бұрын
I loved the F-4 Phantom shot, with The Hulk sitting in a WWII Jeep.
@hazzsanta4482 2 жыл бұрын
where did you get your information from?
@dalechristensen3640 Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the Space Shuttle @ Mach 25.
@user-gh4of6ce3t 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you included HSTDV, actually it was flown to mach 6.5 just for validating the scramjet technology, HSTDV is actually just a tech demonstrator, it will be taken to mach 10 in the next test Edit- not mach 10 but mach 12.
@docwhiskey996 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@Cresc3n1 2 жыл бұрын
Yes it was just a preliminary test flight -Proud Indian
@iamasmurf1122 2 жыл бұрын
Rookie numbers ! On our planet we achieved warp drive technology
@spartannige3296 2 жыл бұрын
@@iamasmurf1122 On your… planet?
@user-gh4of6ce3t 2 жыл бұрын
@@spartannige3296 easy there m8, just a joke.
@loco141r3 2 жыл бұрын
The French strategic nuclear bomber Dassault Mirage IV is missing, able to reach Mach 2.2...
@jeandelacroix6726 2 жыл бұрын
Mirage G at 2.34 too
@t.d.phillips7283 2 жыл бұрын
Strange, nobody remembers the French...
@dedurocortorum365 2 жыл бұрын
No, the data was classified.
@QueenDaenerysTargaryen 2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps
@jeremypintsize7606 2 жыл бұрын
Also missing Mirage III max speed Mach 2.2 first figth 1956 introduced in 1961 Mirage 2000 max speed Match 2.2 fist figth 1976 introduced 1984
@iceslayer777 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about the SR-71 (aka blackbird) was that the actual name was supposed to be called RS-71, but the president said this incorrectly at the time so it was renamed what we know it as today. 😎
@awilywolf Жыл бұрын
Music got unexpectedly epic as we approached Mach 3 and above, lol!
@icaruscarinae 2 жыл бұрын
F22 and F23 actually have a higher max speed...it's just that their afterburner stats are secret. All the other US fighters are using their afterburner speeds
@user-qi8nz8gm7h 2 жыл бұрын
yes, of course.. And only the Russians and the Chinese merge the true performance of the aircraft into the network.. Neither the author nor you know or recognize the real characteristics.. So keep fantasizing..))
@odinskugga7383 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, theres AB probably melts ,like F35 Hahahaha......
@valentincretaine1969 2 жыл бұрын
Il est oi le meilleur avions de chasse au monde :le rafale(bien meilleur que le f22 raptor)
@arunjith9397 2 жыл бұрын
Every platforms have their own advantages and disadvantages We don't want a war to happen so peace guys
@1563ckg43 2 жыл бұрын
@@user-qi8nz8gm7h it’s not it’s speed it is it’s electronics warfare Suite that truly makes any fighter these days. Thats why the F22 was never sold or left unattended in allied hangers, or ours as well. We ETechs had a saying when I was still ‘in’. “Leave it in the Cellar till it ripens to a true ambrosia fitting of the times. Just let it chill a while longer”. China just might cause us to drag some of it out!
@johnnybeer3770 2 жыл бұрын
I remember as lad in the 50's Peter Twiss becoming the first man to do 1'000 mph in level flight in the Fairey Delta 2 .🇬🇧
@stealthysaucepan2016 2 жыл бұрын
Very beautiful plane
@gvincent3246 2 ай бұрын
7:21 feeling proud❤🔥
@KaoukabiJaouad Жыл бұрын
the most advanced aircraft are not focused on speed, and some jets are missing, the F117, the french RAFALE, impressive stuff great video
@moustachio334 2 жыл бұрын
Always always always take Chinese specifications with a grain of salt.
@chucktaurus1148 2 жыл бұрын
To be fair, you probably can't make these claims nowadays without some satellite verifying their flight speeds from space.
@cl0206 2 жыл бұрын
the SR-72 hasn't even been flown and claiming mach 6, now that's suspect
@TheChenchen 2 жыл бұрын
Because it's too bland ?
@sophisticatedthumb5364 2 жыл бұрын
better than over estimate than underestimate
@chrisvesy7245 2 жыл бұрын
I remember those F-104s breaking the sound barrier when i was a kid back in the 60s....they also made a howling whistle sound that was ear candy to a Kid! 😆
@pepeperez210 2 жыл бұрын
They crying wolf was nicknamed...
@henryrivera47 9 ай бұрын
Let’s not forget that manhole cover that reached Mach 169
@jotaere100 2 жыл бұрын
The Apollo shuttle reached Mach 32 on re-entry with a crew of three in 1969. The Space Shuttle Challenger reached Mach 23.5 before its explosion. The Space Shuttle missions performed both civilian and military missions. The Avangard is an unmanned missile.
@weseethehypeoutside 2 жыл бұрын
such high speeds caused by lunar escape
@jotaere100 Жыл бұрын
@@weseethehypeoutside True on the Apollo shuttle which used lunar escape to reach that speed but the Challenger was being propelled by its engines right after take off when it exploded.
@toddjones1480 Жыл бұрын
@@weseethehypeoutside They have a glide vehicle in the top slot, so shuttles should be included, or the glide vehicle removed.
@henthust9784 5 ай бұрын
@@toddjones1480Don't forget, here we are shown objects which reach those high speeds within the atmosphere, not in space where there is no air resistance and friction.
@pit.kremer202 3 ай бұрын
Looks like the author had to put Russian flying device as fastest, because he may be a Russian nationalist. Don’t forget there is a war going on in Ukraine. Let’s pray for to the war to end, and Russia to lose it. Fuck Putin.
@saurabhkatiyar000 2 жыл бұрын
Although I'm an Indian but at 7:22 I'm surprised to know that India also has one Hypersonic flight system.
@Pramodahlawat 2 жыл бұрын
Yes 😳
@liitkgp6570 2 жыл бұрын
Wtf u haven't heard about hsdtv test 😢😢 of drdo
@jabb8937 2 жыл бұрын
I think it’s a drone
@believer990 2 жыл бұрын
Am also seeing this first
@unknown_5107 11 ай бұрын
It is hypersonic glide vehicle
@jersonverdeflor6093 2 жыл бұрын
I've read somewhere or heard in a documentary that sr 71 was never pushed to the limit so no one really knows what the top speed is.
@TheZayas55 2 жыл бұрын
Actually they do know... and you don't believe they would retire the world's fastest aircraft without a replacement? Try Mach 8 to 9.
@squiblebobble 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheZayas55 we dont need a replacement because we use drones and satelites for reconnaissance now. Thats why jets are heavier and slower now
@mpc007 2 жыл бұрын
Whats the difference between fighter, interceptor, and air superiority classes? In this presentation they are discussed as different while I think they are more or less the same (purpose: win air-air engagements)
@drnefario6576 Жыл бұрын
so after the black bird and some others, we hit some theretical aircraft. plz clarify.
@user-zr4on1ff9p 2 жыл бұрын
Миру Мир ! Птички красивые. Сколько труда ушло на создание этих машин , представить сложно.
@ArshMishra69 2 жыл бұрын
Hahah 😂
@pickle6599 2 жыл бұрын
И не говори. Кажется порою даже, что весь гений человека направлен на полет.)
@user-yn5jc9rs1r 2 жыл бұрын
@@pickle6599 и все равно при этом до совершенства ещё ой как далеко
@Art-RR 2 жыл бұрын
@@user-yn5jc9rs1r почему же? Мы достигли совершенства в стремлении мочить друг друга... Почти все птички военные. Хотя не спорю, красиво. Но все же жаль, что мечта о сверхскорости "после работы сгонять за час на другой континент помочь коллегам решить научную проблему" выродилась в "догнать и замочить, чтобы, хм... партнёры с тебя последние штаны не сняли".
@user-yn5jc9rs1r 2 жыл бұрын
@@Art-RR и не говори
@shijieldho9859 2 жыл бұрын
A brand new Content... AMAZING (viz) as always❤️
@AmazingViz 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoy it! 😁😁
@frankdyno9567 Жыл бұрын
50s and 60s fighters were way faster than the ones we got now... Marvelous
@boboboy8189 Жыл бұрын
It's pretty useless in modern warfare because nowadays, every 5th gen have missiles detection that can shoot more than kilometer away. So if they lock on you, even with flare. There's a chance you still got shoot by missiles
@m-h1217 Жыл бұрын
Many fighters in the 50s and 60s had the purpose of intercepting enemy supersonic bombers, thus they needed to be extremely quick.
@teresamaflin5996 Жыл бұрын
I just realized you included the J-20 2 times in the video.
Growling Sidewinder
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
AppleTheme
Рет қаралды 111 М.