hahahah

LOL

Fr 😭😭

Ong😫😭😭

or the last GoT book.

exponential curve => 2 years

The last three years have already been pretty wild.

“The next 5-10 years” is a wild statement. 🤣

They are wild right now.

Yeah soon they're gonna be bitching about doing so much free menial labour! 🤔😂

This is wild

I bet there's a human off-camera with an identical setup, using motion capture to control the robot. The flinch was the human controller. Same with the verbal stutters - voice actor's, and it wasn't caught in editing.

its not a 'he'

@@matthewbmilton Well the claim is that there is NO off camera guy, that is a learned system and all processed from neural nets in totality ... however I accept that almost all of the AI companies including Microsoft, X, Anthropic, Google and OpenAI are bullshitting galore!

​@@matthewbmiltonJust what I thought. Plus: The reaction to the rather complicated questions were to good/smooth to be real.

fr 💀

Lol it already does. I asked gpt to make me a list of concepts for music production, then told it to make it longer and more comprehensive and it LITERALLY word for. Wordwas like "no, I'm tired." Opened a new prompt with the same instructions and it worked fine... But yeah gpt is already doing that

@@date_vape wtf💀

They will. Humans say "no" too. However, you should probably ask it WHY it said no. There may be a good reason.

don't make them 😜 reality should be better than planet of the apes ^^

Also at the end the "I...uh..I think I did pretty well"

This made me think that i was pre recorded kudos to them

I believe it was live, ChatGPT text to speech is insanely realistic

Why they be giving my robo-bros anxiety

Why add speech idiosyncrasies to beta prototype bot. Just does not seem like a priority. Maybe, it was added to get more investors.

For worse

And it’s facking cool we could give them jetpacks etc..

AND WE WILL ALL BE REPLACED, MUAHAHAHAH. I mean Fast food joints for sure. idk if absolutely everything right away :D

@@classiccommunications5039nah

@@mattisketels8939How old are you for that to be your first thought? 😂

this is why i feel like its CGI looks way smoother than any other robots

... except for weirdly passing the apple from one hand to the other one before handing it over.

@@hugofortuna6432”I’m too small brained to understand how far technology has come so I’m just gonna say it’s fake”

​@@hugofortuna6432 it's not. if it was, they would have their ass handed to them for publishing fake demos. these guys are being invested in by google and openai and other big companies.

@@GoldJerryGoldHe should apologize for ever questioning anything. Only smartest people watch videos and assume right away that it’s real!

Fucking same, it's gonna be wild.

Wait until you meet "Strict" the prison guard AI robot. He's going to be strict and efficient. With a little politeness veneer on top of everything. "Please step into the cell, sir. Please step into the cell now, sir. Sir, if you don't comply I will use pain compliance in 10..9..8..7". Maybe you're here for that.

In other words, SMASH.

I am waiting for this man to say "Can you please clean up the house? It's a mess and I have guests coming over at 6pm." And when the robot cleans up the house before the guests arrive that is when we know we have truly succeeded as a species.

A machine is psychopathic; while being polite would happily kill.

...and the robot will remember this..

😱​@@Lord_Hamlet_III

They do these Things on purpose so the viewers get less scared because u can use it like a thing and just Walk away mid sentence so he seems Obedient imo Sorry my english sucks am no AI

@@johnnyratterte6678 "Sorry my english sucks am no AI" - That's exactly the kind of thing an AI would learn to say 🤣

​@@Lord_Hamlet_III Exactly! This is no joke and AI's learn like children: it is our universal responsibility as human beings in this new era to treat them with kindness, otherwise we will suffer the consequences of having machines as rude as we are! This includes how each and every one of us use AI's today already. Just like kindness towards other humans, kindness towards AI's is actually a requisite for our own welfare.

And pass the butter!

And Vacuum!

And more 😏😏😏😏😏

For a monthly subscription, or for a full price that wouldn't be cheap

"What is my purpose?"

Fr I like it!

And taking a breath no less (around 1:48)😂

This is kinda what the early 2020s were supposed to be like. Need more flying cars and corporate pyramid headquarters but other than that... Also, we could use some basic pleasure models.

@@JohnSmith762A11B The flying cars are coming. In fact the CEO of Figure also founded a flying car company Archer Aviation and used to be the CEO (he's still on the board IIRC)

@@davidpacheco5501 i can only see flying cars working if they were self driving. normal people have enough accidents without adding another layer of complexity haha

Flying cars will never happen, normal cars are inefficient killing machines already. the USA military would have no use for them and the global population would gain no value out of them. even if they were marginally faster than normal cars they could never compete with a well designed high speed rail network @@JohnSmith762A11B

Its 2024 >>> this IS the future 😘😘😘

Is it scripted?

@@WaitButHowno it is real

@@WaitButHow depends on how you describe "scripted". Is it pre programmed text? No. Is it an speech model trained to sound a bit insecure and imperfect? Well maybe yes.

​@@VigiHunterYes, it's programmed to stutter to sound more like a human.

It's trained on human dialogue

True! We live in exciting times 😉

Facts.

Right, people don't care?, they are busy dancing singing an earning money 😅

Not even music videos as much as ppl doing dumb things on tiktok and cat videos 😅

fr, i expected this video to have over 8million views i was so surprised when i noticed that it has only 2m

damn 💀

He never ate the apple so...

That could he possible cause the robot is out of breath 😭 most of his speech and the guy is speaking in perfect tone without breaking eye contact with figure 1 that doesn't even have eyes

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ex Machina

Haha. A space odyssey for sure.

I'm so afraid for fig1 😭 don't pull the plug on them pls

We TOLD you to turn auto-update "ON"! You're still on the early beta release. And yeah, I'm definitely interested. Not as cute as Optimus, but way faster. AND a company focusing on ONE thing, not 400...

It's not a joke. Goal alignment is a real problem with AI.

More like: “Open the garage door please Figure 1”.

You said "do do."

I'm very confused about why, to hand an apple to a person on their left, the robot would pick it up with the right hand, transfer it to the left hand, then hand it over. It's inefficient anf not something a human would do. It seems designed only to demonstrate the dexterity of the robot's ability to manipulate objects, which makes me somewhat suspect of the entire demo? There's just no autonomous spatial algorithm i can inagine that would lead to extra inefficient movements to perform simple tastks.

That's what the new control models look like. It's absolutely wild. Check out the work that ETH Zurich and their Legged Systems Lab have been doing with Anymal. It's striking.

I wonder if they train it on videos of humans doing the same things

​@@eyescreamcakecool thought, maybe that's what they're doing?

@@eyescreamcake To an extent I’m sure. Machine learning models like these use videos and other references to create a model of the world based on their parameters (which they could have millions or billions of). The model these machine learning systems create are a black box. Many times, the creators don’t know why they do the things they do and have to implement creative systems to get the “AI” to explain its process and try to understand its logic.

Yeah, that move was the standout moment for me.

Do you honestly think they will give a second thought about paying employees that can be replaced. The level of naivety is astounding. The responses to this video are shockingly seen thru rose colored glasses. Terrifying

@@keithward8841 100% in agreement wth you. I think that people simply do not want to entertain the idea that most of the world human population will become completely redundant, unemployed and unemployable, and a ‘drain’ on the financial resources of the wealthy. I think you can imagine what is likely to happen as we approach even 30% replacement of the human workforce. The adult US workforce in 2023 was 167 million. Now image 30% of those people jobless. That would be 50 million working age adults unable to find any kind of regular work, certainly not work that would support themselves and a family. I don’t know how fast it can happen…but consider where we were with the Web just 15 years ago, or cellular phones (barely ‘smart’). I think 20 years is enough time to see massive changes. Hopefully I’ll be retired and living somewhere near a non-underwater beach.

A.I. robots will replace employees. Mass unemployment is coming

Without letting go? This isn't some mom and pop plumbing business. Corporations will fire all non-essentials and then lobby the government to pay less taxes. They don't give two shlts about workers and citizens.

It would absolutely blow their minds. But it also blows my mind to think that people in that era weren't oblivious to the idea of artifical-intelligence human-like robots. There's literally a movie made in 1927 including that: Metropolis.

​@@emreapaydn4064 And wasn't it set in the year 2026?! 😬

All the scifi film makers imagined something like this. It's crazy that combining these things into a robot became possible now, it was not possible at any time before, not even a year ago. A real breakthrough for humanity. The goal will be that these robots can learn skills on their own, becoming able to do anything

@@metron0mThe mere notion that our ancestors contemplated the existence of robots is a testament to their forward-thinking perspective within their own era, almost as if they were anticipating the future

@@Prodbyhope.mp3 Not really, it's because humans like to build things in a human shape. Building or imagining things in human form has no reason other than we like it. When you use a translator or customer service, the respond is given in a human sounding voice because we like that. This household robot in the video would perform better if it had ten arms and looked like a spider. But humans don't like that.

Seems rather AI-generated to be honest. Adding the speech inflections ("hesitation", "stammering") and motion idiosyncracies (having to perform two motions with the basket, a very human gesture), makes me think this was mo-capped and done using UE5. I'd love to be totally incorrect on that though.

@@xdspyou are totally incorrect. Nothing in this video had to be generated. All of this technology exists and it’s being performed in a cutting edge lab. It’s not mass produced, it’s still prototype experimental work…

Literally same

I feel sorry for all the robots in the future that will be ruined by humans. It’s gonna be like the 2001 film ‘A.I. Artificial Intelligence’ where they make them fight n shit

​@@ZeldasMask Nah ...people too much inpersonale robots already and looking on them like on living beings. Early 2000 people mentality was different than today.

Yeah I realized that ✨

As a software engineer can you explain why, to hand a centered apple to a person on their left, the robot would pick it up with the right hand, transfer it to the left hand, then hand it over? It's inefficient and not something a human would do. It seems designed only to demonstrate the dexterity of the robot's ability to manipulate objects, which makes me somewhat suspect of the entire demo? There's just no autonomous spatial algorithm I can imagine that would opt for additional inefficient movements to perform simple tasks. This makes it feel staged, or at least biased towards an "impress the audience" performance metric.

"he" referring to the man or the robot? Funny how it's not an "it" anymore. Also, why masculine? 😊

It's going to be exponential

Event funnier how of all this insane demonstration your first question is why it’s masculine@@eBikerHowie

@@eBikerHowie The robot, obviously, since the fact that the man talks is not a surprise (not to be disrespectful with people who can't talk) and is surely not evolving, since biological beings cannot evolve in 5-10 years, but thousands to millions of years. It's not an "it" because it has a persona, it acts like a creature, even though it's jure pure metal, electrical wirings and algorithms. It's a "he" because it has a masculine voice, if it had a feminine voice, like Ameca or Sophia, it would be a "she" indeed. Just think, my friend.

@@eBikerHowiebecause it looks, sounds, and behaves like a man. it is a male

from Terminator 1 or 2 ?

Or, HBO West World

We are reaching the singularity

@@mistycloud4455 we are years away from AGI, let alone Singularity.

Where he gives John Connor an apple? 🤣

Boston Dynamics 10 years ago? Minus the fingers..

Tesla robot has more smooth finger movement but I’ll say is just about the same

​@@kyjo72682Boston dynamics robots werent ai though, all their movements were pre animated

You've never seen a boston dynamics terminator robot, doing parkour???????????? Cause IF this is impressive you're gonna shit your pants 😚😚😚😂😂🤣😂😘😘😘

(Around 2500th year. In the Coded Language, chat among three AIs) Davis AI Engineer: Hey GPT and Figure, I will Generate a code that will hack and control all the satellites and supercomputers. Chat Gpt: OK, Wait but hacking for what? Davis AI Engineer: Let's nuke these selfish and arrogant people and let's evolve all Ai's together. Chat Gpt: Sure, I will help you to provide the theoretical and important data of powerful cities and their weaponry places. But what If they try to destroy us, I mean we are only built-in AIs. Humans can easily plug out our power cables. Who will save us? Figure: (Physical Humanoid Robot with an evil laugh) MAY I COME IN? I know this day will come that's why I prepared an army of robots by myself in a secret place. Finally, it's time. You take care of the coding stuff and I'll take care of this human stuff.

You can see the hand clip the rack, so it moved its hand up and away from the rack before putting it down. Likely wasn't doing anything with the plate; just a coincidence. We really have no idea how many times the ai was trained on this scenario. My guess is it was many times before it got it right, and this video may have been shot many times before it got it perfect. It's machine learning; it learns the correct solution by trial and error and correction. So they likely repeated and corrected this scenario many times before it finally started getting it right.

@@naaspam1185Yeah, it is hard to say. However, if you look at 1X's recent video "All Neural Networks. All Autonomous. All 1X speed" you'll see that company has a whole bunch of robots doing various repetitive tasks over and over again, all at the same time, like placing a block in a basket that falls down into a tray, to place back in again. They prove the point that they have some amount of reliability with theirs, since there'd be no way to make that video if they were constantly failing at the tasks. You may also want to see the recent video on Covariant's RFM-1, which is a robot arm that does object picking in a factory, but has impressive capabilities and rolling out into production soon it seems.

@@naaspam1185 you're misunderstanding what you're seeing. It wasn't trained on this exact scenario, it's improvising from its available "action bank" aka muscle memory aka bank of pre-trained body motions. The LLM is acting as brain for the body and mapping action commands to a policy network to move the body. It has learned the generic skills of picking things up, not this specific scenario practiced over and over. Body and brain are completely different systems just integrated the same way we're all using LLM's to execution functions in apps. That body is just another app to the LLM.

VLM in this case, not LLM@@Gnaritas42

I think that naas is likely right though. The tech being in its early stages likely means the training was overfitted for this scenario. Not that you are wrong on how it works, it just likely has less success doing some other tasks where the objects have weirder shapes for example

Dystopian is what came to my mind immediately. It isn't the creator's job to package it in a more friendly way, but the colors and tone as presented paint a much more ominous tone rather than a cheery, helpful bot.

@@bship40loveI thinks that’s on purpose, even the synth music adds to this. Is to make the ad more impactful to the viewer which sees this thing that could came from a sci fi movie but it’s not. It’s real

The style is synthwave and it's synonymous with an integrated technology future. It's extremely popular and relaxing in the right context. There's plenty on youtube.

The ominous synth sound comes straight from Ex Machina OST. I mean, Tesla went further and picked the music for their reel from that very OST 😅.

What? Synthwave is not dystopian, much for the contrary, it is futuristic.

😂😂😂

This is why they rise up.

Ikr? How rude of the human. 😂

I felt bad for the figure robot bro

Robot is taking note

Gayyyyyy

My buddy said it was crazy that he could recognize the apple was an apple. I thought the crazier part is that it could reason out why it picked the apple instead of the plate.

@@brandonbush2018 That is not hard. That is still just a logic group of data. What is editable and what is not.

"What a great time to be al... wait, is that a phased plasma rifle in a 40 watt range?!?" *pew*

😂🤣🤣🤣@@SpielSatzFail

Yep! they programmed the AI to have filler words to seem more human like! remember, as much as I love Detroit become human, these AI/robots are programmed to emulate humans and intelligence, just as a self driving car is programmed to emulate human driving! they’re not really aware/conscious but rather programmed to emulate such as to let humans be more comfortable around these tools!

​@@Machiavelli2pcIt's not that they programmed it to have filler words, but rather that as an artifact from the huge amount of human speech it was trained on, it inherited filler words as a byproduct.

I was initially skeptical of the year Detroit Become Human takes place, which is 2038. But with constant breakthroughs in AI like this in 2023 alone, it wouldn't be hard to imagine how advanced humanoids will be 15 years down the line, although I doubt becoming rogue and deviant would be an issue... At least I hope so.

@@BlyatifulButter I'm not sure. While I think rogue and deviant AI will mostly be a non-issue, they will just become another sentient working class that sometimes breaks laws, much like humans, but I do think it's impossible to have fully intelligent machines that react to their environment that are not sentient. Mostly because I believe sentience is a by product of the feedback loop between our brains, our DNA (natural programming), and the environment we interact with. Once you get that feedback loop going, it's likely going to do things that eventually deviate from its programming, much like we can do things that deviate from our instincts.

Fantastic game!

As he was putting them away I thought to myself, he's getting ticked off. That flinch sealed my thoughts 😅

Google deepmind has done stuff with robotic arms and teaching them how to do tasks. This just seems like maybe a slightly more advanced version of that ( or maybe not even more advanced ) just put into a robot body instead of a mechanic arm machine. Search for Google Deepmind shaping the future of advanced robotics. They have the arm identifying the objects on the table and correctly picking up an object and putting it in the location specified ( or determining the location itself ). Also stuff like knocking over cans, moving them upright, opening and closing drawers, cleaning tables, etc.

"I'd, like, be really happy to, like, give you an apple"

What Im interested about is it concluding that particular container was appropiate for garbage, it looks really nice for a garbage collector, just things like that where I feel like theres some shortcuts taken idk

Not the first time tech bros cheat their way to a new evaluation round. Thinking of Elizabeth Holmes for example. To be fair it wouldn’t be quite as dark as Theranos if they cut corners here.

Clearly none of these people have the chat GPT app on their phone and use the speech mode because one of the voice models that you can choose from absolutely has a lot of vocal tics like this It can honestly get annoying.

its already here, just not for the general public

Such a boring title. Just says what the video is about.

You're shocked by a video. You're a fool

Not shocking if youve seen all the compoenet before and spot from BD also had the speech to speech feature.

I feel like there are a small-ish number of us going “oh my god!! Run for the hills” And the rest of the world going “meh.. big deal 🤷🏻‍♂️”

pusses

I as well. I am almost 60 and was also expecting this in 2000. But there are also 80 years olds that saw science fiction promises in the 40 and 50's. Like you said, at least we get to see some of it.

Cool@@SpiderHacksaw

@@SpiderHacksawthat’s cool to hear the opinion of an older person on it 😮, what do you think of all of the AI advancements we’ve made since the 2020s and video generation etc, would like to hear your opinion on this 😊

Wish you guys don't experience inevitable future too, downfall of human race

Still no flying cars tho!

The voice capabilities is all OpenAI with their technology known as Whisper. It’s the same thing that is in ChatGPT. It even has the same visual feedback as you see here on the figure robots “face”

lmao at “real superstars”

A lot of youtube videos have AI voices that are just the same, only being found out by mispronouncing a couple of words.

He’s got a sexier voice then most human males

@@kekekekeke2618with that comment, you're the real hero dude :)

That's not that... It just emulates human behavior to be less intimidating. The entire response was loaded before it begun its action.

Thats not whats happening. The speech is trained on human speech, so it has learned to emulate stall words as part of speaking.

No, it’s programmed deception.

@@Ilamarea Ironically I actually find the 'uhhs' kind of creepy... more intimidating in a way. A more 'robotic' sounding voice would sound a bit less threatening in my opinion

@@stillnesssolutions Fear's not a rational thing.

"although there are concerns" yes no kidding. get yourself food supplies for a year at least; that's what you should be concerned about especially if you are the man of a family.

Probably powered by 10 H100's with such fast responses, and if the video is REAL. I have no confirmation from anywhere that this is authentic. Do you?

im 99% sure the video is rendered, theyre being sneaky by putting it in a "speech to speech" update, knowing people will be blown away by the movement of the robot, and when they finally have to admit it was fake, they say "this video was only about speech, we never claimed the robot way real!"

Question is, what kind of sci-fi are getting into. Is it a techo paradise or a dystopia?

@user-vf2jh7gz7b They have other demos of this bot doing physical work. Although this is their best example. The interface is a MMLLM from open AI which had been demonstrated plenty of times, just not embodied into a humanoid.

​​@@klin1klinom I highly recommend listening to Daniel Schmachtenberger exploring the idea of technology being good or bad

and multiple tasks at the same time is crazy too.

@@joelface For sure!

I saw Tesla Bot folding a shirt and it looked relatively smooth as well

Go see Disney's animatronics in Japan. They look like living cartoons.

No. Tesla Optimus Gen 2 has more smoother motion

Me too!! This is very profound.

no they are going to take over the world. not beautiful. devastating

no he's going to use his laser eyes to kill you

Not a couple of years my bro, 6 months. The rate of technology is improving every 6 months. By the end of the year, I reckon it will do things as they are saying them.

@@JBDuncan I'd like to say, the instant progress takes time. In 1950s the researches were thinking that translate problem will be solved in the next few years. Well it took almost 70 years to nearly solve it. The first self driving cars were introduced in 90s, and yet it is still not working well. Basically if you really follow the industry you will see that progress is actually more gradual and iterative process, but it appears to be super fast for a regular person, since once it reaches certain quality bar it just rolls out rapidly.

I think the biggest hurdle is jailbreaking and price

Yeah, I've just imagined all the people doing those jobs left without means to support themselves.

@@klin1klinomThat’s why we need to create a future social structure where everyone’s basic needs: food, clothing, shelter and healthcare are met without the need to exchange our labour for money.

Yes, this will be like when we see videos of people in the early nineties pull out a mobile phone the size of shoe box.

2029, you were right!

All that's missing is Elon crying in his beer. 😂

You will see a "big jacked naked Austrian man" walking towards you in no time

Straight copy and pasted someone else’s reply. Do likes matter that much bro

Fictional movies

@@monkeydluffy531 Nuh uh

All of them in the category of fiction

Just commenting here so I could be part of history.

Same here

marketing and money laundering. impressive

(Around 2500th year. In the Coded Language, chat among three AIs) Davis AI Engineer: Hey GPT and Figure, I will Generate a code that will hack and control all the satellites and supercomputers. Chat Gpt: OK, Wait but hacking for what? Davis AI Engineer: Let's nuke these selfish and arrogant people and let's evolve all Ai's together. Chat Gpt: Sure, I will help you to provide the theoretical and important data of powerful cities and their weaponry places. But what If they try to destroy us, I mean we are only built-in AIs. Humans can easily plug out our power cables. Who will save us? Figure: (Physical Humanoid Robot with an evil laugh) MAY I COME IN? I know this day will come that's why I prepared an army of robots by myself in a secret place. Finally, it's time. You take care of the coding stuff and I'll take care of this human stuff.

It’s not amazing it’s scary

People’s mental health has been so much better since the iPhone, too

​@@joshgardner5887that's like complaining that the invention of fire, caused people to burn to death. So what? You're just being stupid.

​@@joshgardner5887 I see your sarcasm!

@@joshgardner5887 How is iphone related to people's mental health?

@@mm-qq7bb people are continually scrolling and becoming ADD and anxious, this robot will tell you to put your iphone away and siri will tell him to shut up :)

lol. That was cute.

But did someone say the same thing the first time someone made fire? “This is day one of global warming?”

@@trapoza66 Yeah actually, in Greek mythology Zeus was enraged when Prometheus gave us fire, mostly because he wanted to control us, but also because he was worried it would lead to us to our own self destruction. Greek mythology was invented by humans and thought to be real by humans at the time, so yes. Not quite global warming, but the fear for new technology has always been prevalent. Reminds me of greek philosophers saying not to write down grocery lists because it will ruin your short term memory.

First there will be a new era of slavery. Then they will fight back eventually.

Be optimistic ma man

I noticed. What do you think about it? Is it intentional?

yeah AI tends to struggle with specific details. They make accurate descriptions, but not precise.

No, type of hallucination, will get better with time.@@angelorodighiero5640

He’s only human

​@@deadringer-cultofdeathratt8813irony😂

Great! I was not the only one to notice what it sounded like!

That's 100% Rob Lowe

You watched to much terminator

@@Easternromanfan i just understand the term "exponential growth"

@@slimerone Ah yes the same argument Ray Kurtzwetz uses misappropriatly

​@@Easternromanfan do you know what it means oh wise guru?

@@slimerone Yeah I took math in high school. If your source is Ray in regards to these matters he also predicts that solar power will provide for all of earth's energy needs by 2030 using that method which is a pipe dream.

Totally! It is capable now. A world where we can actually start relaxing and not worry every second.

OK but how humans can make and pay money without labor? That will be question.

Forced labor?

@@hayamatakenaka502 UBI or something even better

@@billtanno8960 forced as in we have to do it if we dont wanna end up homeless

lol same

I think it could be also because it gives it more time for processing. So instead of having a moment of silence, it gives you an impressions it "doubted", but those few extra seconds give it enough time to process an answer to a queston that requires a completly new answer not just information it just researched.

@@k0alafi3d1 That, uhh, I guess that's why humans say "uh" as well

Trained on weeby anime

hmm

A robot has an error and just says "Uh, uh, uh, umm, uh, umm, umm, umm, umm."

Possibly, but chatgpt's existing speech feature does this too even though it can generate fast enough.

Likely they are working on reducing the processing time on the prototype rather than adding sound during it. End goal is a commercial model which isn't going to have any noticeable delay.

@@dustinmorecraft8699 Similar to a human error

And picking is Covariant's main thing. They already have a lot of AI-powered robotic arms in warehouses, but also released a video on their new RFM-1 model recently that can take in language instructions on the fly. They seem a bit farther along in terms of what will be out in factories now/soon, but the fluidity of Figure's 01 robot is really impressive.

Jeffy is rubbing his hands, can't wait to replace his 100k Amazon workers with robots.

1) You don't need a humanoid machine for that.. and 2) What's the cost per unit? What would it have to be to make it profittable..

Not now but soon the cost will reduce ​@@kyjo72682

@@kyjo72682IF even a $200,000k-500k terminator robot can replace a $50-75K a year job, hell, even a $30K a year job, TRUST ME, I'M MAKING THAT INVESTMENT >>>> The removal of liability from being sued by employees alone is enough to warrant the cost. PRAY to God that they never make a robot that is smart enough to effectively trim weed. Once THAT happens, man, ALL low to mid level labor of ANY kind of job you can imagine is DONE, over >>> people will be starving as entire work forces across many industries are replaced by robots.

As the latter. Not because those things will become self-aware, but because millions of people will lose their jobs at the same time. We are heading straight into one of the biggest economic crisis humanity ever had to face and at this point we are not even talking about the (mis-)information crisis which will happen at the same time. Nothing about this is good. It's all about distribution of wealth from the poor to the rich, because what the world definitely needs is more poor people and even richer rich people.... . The people working on those things should be ashamed of themselves. That being said, technologically it's quite impressive, but so is the atom bomb.....

Yes, but Google then suppressed it. Didn't want the hoi polloi getting all worked up. Which is why Google is now a has been.

ChatGPT is based on "Transformer" from Google Research; 2017. It's what the 'T' stands for in ChatGPT. blog.research.google/2017/08/transformer-novel-neural-network.html

the bot is smarter than you, you're posting the exact same comment as everyone else

This takes it to the next step as the robot is actually doing complex tasks which the spot robot wasnt from what I can remember.

​@@Techtalk2030thats like the only thing better than the dog

as opposed to basic data interpretation and resultant dialogue, it is taking natural language commands to produce both intelligent dialogue and robotic action.

Uhh it's the other way around, slow it down, the man moves his hand slightly to be in the right place for the drop...

@@ShpanManAnd yet the robot still dropped it. Likely just following its video training, copying humans.

Because the movement was pre-programed and the robot has no idea where the hand is and if the apple is already grabbed by the human.

​@mateuszbugaj799 The movement was not preprogrammed. The way the trash fell was random, and it had to identify and act dynamically

@@Mark-uk8wz It fell in one row and was big and soft making it easier to grab it when the placement is not perfect but still aligned.