Thanks this is actually useful

урал

Why are you listening the settings for the R Compressor. They are based on his incoming audio, and it is subject to change every single time you record something, ultimately rendering it irrelevant and useless.

Great Note taker! Thanks

Where We can find it

you can do this also on an audient or discrete or almost any interface now

Are you saying to basically just mute/unmute your vocal fx chain for playback? Monitor through console > record to track with vocal fx chain muted (in Ableton) > unmute fx chain during playback ?? I’m just worried about hearing both console and Ableton signals at the same time.. are you also changing the track from “off” to “auto” each time you want to playback recorded takes? Hope this isn’t too confusing 🫤

This is what I do in logic. It’s actually really convenient cuz I mix with a lot of UAD plugins and I have a bunch of DSP. So I can basically run the exact same chain on my interface itself as I do in the DAW. And both the monitoring and recording channels end up being 0 latency cuz the plugins are running on the interface, not the Mac. 🔥🔥🔥

Hmm I have an Apollo and I monitor through FL or Studio one and I never really have latency. Maybe he's recording at 48k instead of 96k?

You can use the UAD plugins through console or in your daw,, and the latency will remain the same. You don’t need to just run them through console for them to be latency free

@@BrandonAdams1010 Apollo has zero latency that makes it to where you can still monitor without the daw on. The Apollo is essential for people that track with ableton imo. External plug ins alleviate the cpu load as well.

@@nathanaeljames3059 i totally agree, the only downside is you HAVE to buy Auto-tune in order for someone to monitor with tuning. Other than that it's the best thing ever.

@@jahhe2611 my arrow came with autotune realtime and realtime pro

@@priticolours1177 SHEEEESHHHH, lucky you!

@@jahhe2611 I got mine used and the guy said Antares came in the free bundle as well.

…he just broke it down piece by piece…and you still to lazy to replicate it for your self

@@miahdona8161 you obviously havent touched FL lmao

I actually did a template with full inspiration from kenny in fl 21

⁠@@WattyWrld Could I please get that sent to me? I would really appreciate it! Thank you!!

Lemme give ya, I got it❤️​@@ayeitsnouraofficial

Would the second track be necessary using this method if you can use Take Lanes or am I missing something?

@@HalfJoked its not necessary but it gives you more control of your edits on the fly

You can do this easier: Put monitoring on your effects "Tracking" track. Create a new Audio Track ( CMD + T ) and put the monitoring off on that --> --> Arm both tracks for recording --> After recording just take the one from the empty effects audio track.

@@preciousgaming5191 isn’t that what kenny did?

The Problem is the effects goes through the track with off monitoring, so no

You still get latency even when you turn direct monitoring off?

Thanks for mentioning the gate, I was wondering why he wouldn’t put even a light gate on the monitor side, just nice to have but not if it’s being printed onto the recording

wtf the thing with the gate is just not true, the effects/plugins on a recorded track are never baked into the recording itself, even a gate. If you delete every effect on the recorded track it will be just raw (besides some latency if monitor was set to "in" as kenny explained). How do you get to your result with the gate? I'm interested :D

@@Fizzzel i don’t know how you came to the conclusion that it’s not. I’ve recorded in Ableton for years and can assure you, it’s true. I agree it doesn’t make sense but if you record with the stock gate on, it affects the recorded signal

​@@tajbratton2961Do you recommend I change Daws via pc? I love Ableton but recording vocal chains act funny at times and it's getting to me...

I couldn't spot a difference either. He may have forgot to make his adjustments on this version. I just wish I could figure out how to record with reverb and delay without latency coming through the headphone mix. That's the thing that gets me still.

record in mono, I have a mixer plugged into the input on my interface coming in input3-4, set one input to 3 and the other to 4, its the same signal from the mic, that'll allow you to record enable both tracks. that's been my best workaround for now, I don't think Logic will allow record enable on two tracks with the exact same input but multitrack recording is definitely possible

cause he’s on the go most of the time with not the same hardware everywhere

i dont use ableton but on FL you CAN print processing such as auto tune onto the vocal recording so i imagine its possible in ableton too. you dont really want tuning on a bus/aux as i can imagine it causing some unpleasant results, especially on harmonies.

You can print it but yes you need it on each track it's designed for monophonic sounds

He probably treated his room better for cleaner recordings and just got better at tracking. If you have a quiet enough room and understand how to track properly you shouldn’t need a gate.

Everything’s free online 🏴‍☠️⛵️

I just commented this: In case you use FL Studio and want to do this: On the mixer, route one RAW channel to another where you want to put whatever effects you want, then unlink the raw channel from the MASTER channel and arm disk recording (dot button at the bottom of the mixer channels) on the channels you want to record, then hit record>play to start recording (it will be reflected in the playlist). Additionally, if you have a project with too many active plugins on other channels, it will be impossible for there to be no latency, and if for some reason you don't want to freeze all the tracks or render the instrumental, adjusting the track latency (clock button at the bottom of every channel on the mixer)>Set from>Master. This adjusts the latency and makes sure there is not too much latency. I hope it helps someone.

saaaaaame bro, it seems this come from the R comp lowering everything, need help pls someone

Dont copy 1 by 1, you do not have the same Mic, Preamp and Interface like Kenny. You will have to adjust Volume through some other means (e.g. LA-2A on either beginning or end of chain)

@@realtoni420 thanks!

Lol Just did ;)

@@FrankBell do you have it for ableton ?

@@TO32242 No, but isn't he using Ableton here?

The only thing I can think of, is try 128 buffer at 44.1 when recording, then during playback raise it to 1024. I’m sure you’ve already done this, but that’s really the only think I can think of, unless I knew all of what plugins you were running when you’re recording

You could always spring for an Apollo twin at some point. I know they’re expansive, but they really are worth it, and they allow you to run latency free with their plugins

I accidentally had my vocals running back to my headphones, not just the dry signal through my sound card, but the full wet vocal, lol. I muted that somehow, and am now fully reaping the benefits of hearing the vocal effects, and the dry vocal from my sound card, with an additional wet vocal track, if that makes any sense. It completely removes the latency issue.

bruhhh please explain what you did to achieve this. im running a focusrite scarlett 2i2 and AT2020 mic. I would rlly like to freestyle in key of the beat with no latency. how did you do this??@@LokeyeMC

@praxusjoon2478 sounds fun! So if you click the yellow button on the track it will activate the channel, meaning you'll hear the processed vocal. Simply deactivate the track by unblinking the yellow button. Your voice will be audible because of your sound card's direct monitoring of the dry audio signal, which will have near-zero latency. But you'll still get the reverb and delay from the sends as long as the send channels are routed correctly like in the above video. Hope that helps. I made the same mistake. If you're still having trouble just let me know how your two tracks are set up and what sound card you're using.

rutracker

exactly, that's what I'm trying to figure out lol

@@LokeyeMC everyone saying use the low latency mode on autotune but what about the rest hahaha.....

@@bigsantamane Haha yeah. But I figured out what it was finally. The trick is to not have the track "activated" when you're recording. Somehow I can still hear my effects through the sends on a track even if it is not activated. But as soon as it's activated I get this terrible loud echo of my voice during the recording process.

what do you mean by activated?@@LokeyeMC

What do you mean weakens the strength

for latency

and cpu

did you find it ?

Fr fr

A slapback delay is a delay with a very short time, so it gives a slightly staggered doubling effect. Rockabilly guitar is a classic example.

Thanks to Toni's comment below, it's looks to be a 32nd note on tempos between 75bpm - 120bpm. And then a 48th note for slower than 75bpm and a 24th note for faster than 7bpm. In fact a slap delay wouldn't drift into 16th note territory until you're above 240bpm in bebop land. But 60ms - 100ms is a far more direct way to think about it.

Its between 60-100 ms delay, not following BPM divisions.

20kHz is the threshold of human hearing, also i may be wrong but I believe that you can have aliasing issues with some plugins if they receive input over 20kHz and don’t have an oversampling option.

Wait what does this all mean is there a setting I change ?cuz my mic ain’t the best?

@@silent5353 lol what mic do you have?

@@michaelrice6620 its called audiotechnica

@@silent5353 at2020?

To me the latency is very loud, so it messes up my thinking when trying to perform with my voice on the mic while listening to latency in the headphone mix.

It’s an Ableton issue, not a Kenny issue

@@tajbratton2961 don’t use Ableton then, I’m sure he’s proficient in every DAW

@@ShayBurgman I mean you’re right but clearly this is easier or more convenient for him then working in another daw ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@ShayBurgman Why would he be proficient in every daw? Most people only know 1 or 2 by heart

@@vael_ legitimately shouldn’t take more than a day to learn a DAW. Using a DAW is easy, making good creative decisions is hard

Just record 2 takes

@@rebinu sounds a lot more natural and interesting too. A doubler is a convenience thing

yeah this setup confused me a little bit i'm not really understanding the difference, but maybe he's saying that the 'tracking' audio may be offset in the ableton grid (tho i feel like it wouldn't) so just to avoid having to pull it back a couple ms he just copies over from 'latency' track? dunno feel like i'm missing something here

They don’t. I’ve literally tried it in Ableton. The latency track with no plug-ins on it records with near 0 latency.

@@bit1856 try it yourself. Record with plug-ins on 1 track and no plug-ins on another at the same time then zoom in at the beginning of the transients and you’ll see the difference

@@bit1856 the audio on the "tracking" track will have latency on it from the effects. It's unavoidable - even though it might be imperceptible, this will avoid the issue altogether. I do the same thing, but I'm not sure why he even records the monitoring track, I just have it monitor.

@@tajbratton2961 What if you turn direct monitoring off on the track with plugins?

you're absolutely correct, literally just click reduced latency when monitoring and it removes the need for a second track, thanks for sharing that btw

How come?

@@deseanbryan5312 gives the vocals a cheap plasticy sound

@@deseanbryan5312 ugly way of imitating the genuinely nice effect of multiple takes

you are slow bruh

Then you clearly are not smart.