😎🏹 Congratulations on developing a very interesting bow! Also, I appreciate your percentage scale; it just makes sense. I obviously must get a Jotoman! 😃 Best wishes toward a speedy recovery.
@alexisalliel733 ай бұрын
Niiice! Looking forward to seeing the fps. It really seems awesome! Great work
@tammynfletcher3 ай бұрын
Looks like a great shooter! Design elements of 2 of the most efficient designs there is! Very suprised at the speed very comparable to the babylon if my ears didnt mistake me. Great collaboration!
@richartist403 ай бұрын
Good point on the scale ..log scale is more realistic
@bethearrow6753 ай бұрын
Well that's another bow for the I need it list. Thanks 😂
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
🤣
@richartist403 ай бұрын
Looks great ..Will try some when you get stock .
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Preorder. I don't keep ready stock.
@richartist403 ай бұрын
Bigger handle is great ..
@b4bluey3 ай бұрын
thank you
@matthewvassar96863 ай бұрын
Dude I want one! That looks so cool and has a lot of potential. I volunteer to test it for you bro
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Contact me directly through WhatsApp (+6012-266-9631) or Facebook (Bamboo Archery - Malaysia)
@gediminasmorkys35893 ай бұрын
Very cool! What is the draw weight? (I guess this is a bit harder to achieve with higher poundages)
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Tested unit is 29.5# 28". This is the first delivery, so I don't yet know what happens with higher poundage.
@gediminasmorkys35893 ай бұрын
@@bambooarcheryof course. Since you drew it way past that, for training at an indoor range this seems plenty!
@richartist403 ай бұрын
Whai is the probable price for a 25 to 30 pound version ?
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
MYR700 = USD149, not including shipping. Contact me directly through WhatsApp (+6012-266-9631) or Facebook (Bamboo Archery - Malaysia)
@17yearoldwarbowarcher3 ай бұрын
plastic string bridge disapointing but im sure it works fine still
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Hard bridge such as plastic, wood, horn, bone, improves efficiency but reduces tolerance to low gpp/dryfire. Soft bridge like rubber sacrifices some efficiency but provides tolerance to low gpp/dryfire. The bowstring is Dacron B50, which is quite elastic, so at least it still has some cushioning to protect against accidental dryfire. If the bowstring is FastFlight, then a rubber bridge would be quite important since the string isn't providing sufficient stretch/protection.
@17yearoldwarbowarcher3 ай бұрын
@@bambooarchery interesting
@km175093 ай бұрын
What’s the best way to contact you about purchasing?
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Contact me directly through WhatsApp (+6012-266-9631) or Facebook (Bamboo Archery - Malaysia)
@JonWickkk-cn1iv3 ай бұрын
do you think you hurt your shoulder due to bad form drawing a heavy bow? Is it possible to hurt ones shoulder even if the form is good?
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Overweight. I normally only shoot 30#. 80# was too much of a jump, and too suddenly, but I had to test to make sure the bow is ok before delivery. I suspect some degree of muscle tear. Next time, I know I won't be pushing myself to test the ultra heavy bows.
@JonWickkk-cn1iv3 ай бұрын
@@bambooarchery Did you get that checked out? AC joint sprain maybe..
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
@@JonWickkk-cn1iv no I haven't. I don't think it's bad enough to need medical attention.
@JonWickkk-cn1iv3 ай бұрын
@@bambooarchery to the main topic of bows, how would changing to a longer string to reduce the brace height, lets say an inch or inch and a half, affect the performance or the way that bow shoots?
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
@@JonWickkk-cn1iv a slightly longer string will drop the brace height and poundage. Despite the slightly reduction in poundage, you actually gain more energy from the extra powerstroke and smoother draw, so it's a nett gain in speed. So ideally I would actually use the longest possible string to get the lowest possible brace height such that the bow is still geometrically stable, forgiving, low handshock. If the brace height is too low, the limbs becomes off balanced and unstable, leading to high handshock and vibration as the limbs jiggle all over. Low brace height also forces the arrow to bend more aggressively around the bow, which makes it less forgiving. Normally bows are already designed around their optimum point, you might be able to adjust the brace height by upto 0.5" without problems, and that may correspond to less than 0.5" change in the string length. 1-1.5" extra is excessive and most likely being completely unusable.
@richartist403 ай бұрын
An assymetrical version of this would have no hand shock ..Could be an idea to reduce hand shock in fiber glass bow ..
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Asymmetric will always have higher handshock and vibration. You can only cancel shock by having identical force in the opposite side. Any asymmetric bow after optimization will always end up being symmetric. To think asymmetric has no shock is completely delusional, like hoping for an unbalanced wheel to spin without vibrations. There's a reason why all asymmetric design went extinct and remain so until modern replication (out of curiosity)
@richartist403 ай бұрын
I have 3 alibow assymetrical bows with 60 pounds at 33 inches and they are loud but no handshock ..Yumi bows I have also feel no handshock .I was told that the yumi has its handle low to avoid the handshock primarily because it is assymetrical ?
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
@@richartist40 it simply means you aren't sensitive enough to notice the handshock. These bows shake violently in my hand. It's crazy how people can consider them as no handshock when high speed camera has shown how violently they vibrate during release. Loud sound is by definition strong vibration, how do you think they make the sound, by vibrating the air around them of course! A bow with low shock/vibration are also automatically very silent.
@richartist403 ай бұрын
If we can work out the payment method I will take 5 to start 4 pieces at 25 pounds and 1 at 50 pounds ..
@ThatIndianArcher3 ай бұрын
A bow should last at least 20000 shots to tell if it is better or failure
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
Solid fiberglass construction is nearly indestructible. The fibers run the full length of the bow, from tip to tip. That's in fact the biggest benefit of this particular type of construction. It doesn't run the risk of delamination like laminated bows because well ... the entire bow is literally 1 single material. Laminated bows need the test of time to reveal any defects in the glueline. However, history and statistics has proven that solid fiberglass bow simply doesn't have such problem to worry about. The disadvantage is usually reduced efficiency, increased shock/vibration, and increased stacking. Throughout the last 9 years in business, I've had only warranted 1 fiberglass bow because it became slightly asymmetric after a whole year of abuse (very poor nock height setting + technique). It could actually be repaired with a bit of heat but it wasn't worth the two way shipping cost, so I decided to just replace it and pay for a one way trip. Otherwise, never had any solid fiberglass bow that broke.
@ThatIndianArcher3 ай бұрын
@@bambooarchery 70 lb Turkish design bending Fiberglass bow after 10000 shot and a year latter. Durability might also depend on the poundage of the bow. My Daylite Phoenix 60lb is still going after 20000 shots and 2 year but 90 broke after a hundred shots and 95 lb korean laminated bow Last only 1000 draws. kzfaq.infoLjbqr0MUsQw?si=2mOop2KlsDXhaEkD
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
@@ThatIndianArcher these bows only go up to 45# 28". Beyond that, you need to change the build. If you use materials designed for lower poundage and just force it to higher poundage, you'll get that kind of problem.
@ThatIndianArcher3 ай бұрын
@@bambooarchery so which material you are suggesting is good for lower poundage bow but bad for higher poundage bow? thick Fiberglass or carbon, Fiberglass and wood laminate.
@bambooarchery3 ай бұрын
@@ThatIndianArcher the material is fine, the configuration/build is the problem. If you have a single thick fiberglass, the stress on the skin is much more than inside. The imbalanced strain causes problem. If the glass has to be thick for getting higher poundage, it is best to make them out of several thinner layers instead of a thick chunk. That way allows the strain to be better distributed. You'll also need to clearly define the neutral axis zone so that the material can maximize their tensile and compression strain. The example you provided, the bow actually didn't fail at the glass fiber, instead the epoxy matrix failed and resulted in buckling. Buckling is a premature failure even when the fiberglass haven't reach its compression limit. So when designing a high poundage with high level of compression, the configuration needs to account for buckling, not just compression. This can be done by using glass fiber in multiple orientation as necessary.
@matthewyu35312 ай бұрын
Hi, would you do a speed test of your 3 bows-- Tatar bow, Sicai, and Jotoman Bow? So customers can compare them and make the right choice. The data is more convincing. Recommendation: Arrow weight should be 550 grains.
@bambooarchery2 ай бұрын
I don't test high poundages. I usually test around 30-35#. Then using formula to convert to exactly 10gpp and 11gpp so that I can do a better and fairer comparison. AF Tatar Oak 49", +9.2ppi, 187.0fps@10gpp, 178.9fps@11gpp AF Sicai Sandalwood 53.5", +7.5ppi, 182.1fps@10gpp, 174.7fps@11gpp Mazan Jotoman Lite 46", +7.7ppi, 181.5fps@10gpp, 173.9fps@11gpp