Iove that moment it's like he is being Touched for the first time 😀😘😘

Ramis said he vowed not to smile during GB1.

@@RoosterMontgomery exactly

It's one of the best intros ever.

That's what I do every time I watch the first and second films.

Me too.

oh hell yeah!

With surround on buddy!

Agreed. Ghostbusters II will always have a special place in my heart. Mostly, because it was released in 1989, which is the same year I was born. Except Ghostbusters II was released on the 16th of June and I was born on the 26th of July.

Period🥇

It was a huge disapointmrnt, even back then.

@@Kalleri13 I absolutely enjoyed it as a kid.

I think most people have come to see it in a much better light these days

The girl with the puppy is also his daughter, Catherine Reitman. She’s is the creator and star of the show Workin’ Moms. It’s pretty hilarious!

I have a feeling that movie will be a flop

@@samhalbert9071 I have a feeling you're going to be wrong, considering its sitting at 79% on Rotten Tomatoes and is directed by someone with some appreciation for the franchise

No crap

Wow

😢🙏😢🙏😢🙏😢🙏

He is dearly missed

Actually I remember getting tired of the Ghostbusters cartoon by 1988, He-Man was old news by 1986.

@@nah....6151 imagine if the kids shouted Ninja Turtles!!! That would have been incredible

@@nah....6151 Agreed as a kid in 1989....the Turtles were the hugest thing among kids at that time.

It very likely had to do with taking a shot at Filmmation that studio behind He-Man as they did an animated show called The Ghost Buster a rendition of the Old The Ghost Busters dated back in 1975 that coincidentally had the same name it had a gorilla similar to Scooby Doo it was weird nothing to do with these films, as a rebuttal the team behind these movies did an animated spin off tittle The REAL GhostBusters

@@nah....6151 Born in 87, the turtles were hot as shit in 90, they were probably in fear of a copyright strike because the turtles movie was already being shopped around and funded.

That’s because the car was really breaking down when they were filming 😂

The tow truck was just off camera. It was a hazzard to air quality

Backfiring aside, you think Ray would keep it clean for appearances.

And it foreshadows how the goo is affected by emotions, with it rising up out the cracks, getting stuck to the carriage, and then being exposed to a series of angry moments between multiple groups of people (ranging from disagreeing with a ticket to demanding a specific job be done asap

I thought it was ok, but certainly not anywhere near brilliant. Also we already know these characters, it's more about checking in with them, seeing where they are now 5 years later and letting the audience know the Ghostbusters have closed shop and gone their separate ways.

@@nighthawk0077 Remember, though: this came out in 1989. Not everybody had a VCR in 1989, and theatrical re-releases didn't happen often, so if people didn't happen to catch ghostbusters on TV, they might not have seen it. My comment "brilliant" wasn't about the quality of the dialog or the quality of the movie (which were pretty far from the original), but rather I thought it brilliant from a writing standpoint that they hit the important points of character introduction. I see a LOT of movies these days that simply TELL you about the characters through exposition rather than showing you.

Yes, but a movie isn't its first ten minutes.

@@kirinrex I understand, I simply disagree with your assessment..

also foreshadowed that awfull ghostbusters movie in 2016, the alien was right, he just missed by a few months.

yes exactly, and I think that ladies prediction about the; "end of the world", the alien, is supposed to be slimer lol

Egon's experiment is about if human emotions affect the environment, and this foreshadows the "mood slime" in the rest of the film.

not sure how likely but really hope afterlife has a similar intro with the logo holding up 3 fingers

Still living rent free in your head.

​@@Superstarseven Yes, obviously. With such a tragedy like Ghostbusters 2016, you CAN'T get it out of your head.

👍🤣🤣

Ouch. The foreshadowing...!

@@eslm-studios2996 the exact release date too

agree. new movie was the best sequel (including the horrible reboot). it did its own thing but paid respect

Hang on, why are you saying the "best" sequel? while commenting on the first sequel. Fricken hypocrites much

@@MrCodes84 It is possible that Afterlife is better than II. Nothing hypocritical about it.

R.I.P. Ivan Reitman

Well Jason Reitman was in the second film and he did his father proud when he did Ghostbusters afterlife. Let's only hope that Jason Reitman will direct the next one because the rumors are true there is another Ghostbusters movie. Let's hope they make it really interesting where they enter the ghost dimension but this isn't necessarily the fourth Ghostbusters movie This is actually going to be the 6th Ghostbusters movie even though the Remake doesn't count as a sequel it does fall in line with the Ghostbusters Cinematic Universe. But there was also the television series that counts as the miniseries and you also have to count the video game as the true third movie. And of course you had to get the okay from Dan Aykroyd and the late Harold Ramis. They created Ghostbusters and it was Ivan Reitman who brought the story to the screen. To this day Ghostbusters is considered an American phenomenon and possibly the greatest bit of entertainment since Live Aid.

I thought the same. Also in GB1 when Ray and Winston are driving back and talking about bible prophecies they have the lights flashing.

Having sirens and police lightbars on your vehicle has its perks

Egon Spengler, the scientific sociopath. May he rest in peace.

Egon Spengler, the scientific sociopath. May he rest in peace.

@@shaggysnax01 how was he a sociopath? Yes, he was socially awkward.

@@jameshaggerty8348 It was a joke. Egon scanning Dana for negativity as to see her anguish...😂😂

6:45 actually

I saw it it in marysville WA with my mother and brother. Went to Skippers for dinner, they used to be great!

GB2 is a great movie - you can watch it on its own plus its fun and entertaining. 1989 was a great year for movies - Indiana Jones was also released the same summer…

@@vijanrama also back to the future part II

@@vijanrama UHF as well.

They should have moved it to later in the year, especially since the movie takes place around the holidays. That summer was very crowded with Batman, Indiana Jones, Honey I Shrunk The Kids, and Ghostbusters all in cinemas simultaneously.

Same happened in 1993 when last action hero came out the same time Jurassic park came out

Well....let's wait and find out if it's some woke garbage or not.

@Tyco Zer0 I'm also worried about it focusing on nostalgia from the other ones instead of a solid new movie. Sort of like what the Terminator franchise did ever since T2.

@@dbsti3006 nothing can ever be as bad as how badly they fucked up terminator... well, except for Star Wars. I have hope that because this is still a family affair, GB:afterlife will have that magic, and yes, we're seeing terror dogs and gozer again. We haven't seen gozer since 1984. it's not like it's marvel MCU regurgitating the same shite over and over again, there is a serious gap in years here, and I have faith they will be filled to satisfaction for the GB Faithful.

@@Mikebuster Gozer taking the form of their thoughts which was the Marshmallow man, was awesome and original. The Statue of Liberty walking through Manhattan was awesome and original. I can't see this movie doing anything new. I'm still giving it a chance though. It's not often that theatres get my money the past 10 years. And yeah, The Terminator franchise ended with T2 in my view.

@@dbsti3006 Like most movies these days, waiting on The Critical Drinker to see it and review it is the safest bet.

Funny 😂😂😂😂😂😂

I don't think kids will be asking for him anymore after Kevin Smith and Netflix 😆

Those quiet kids in the corner: I wanted She-Ra…her show’s better anyway. 😒

I can understand what you mean. I can't imagine any mother wants to outlive their children.

@@nickthepick8043 I can imagine one: Cinderella's stepmother.

@@juanrisa945 Oh yeah. Well, in that case, she isn't a human being. She also needs to be introduced to this little thing called "Blunt Trauma", and I think a right hook on my part would oblige succinctly.

Me too. And I hate to say this, but I saw the second Ghostbusters before the first one.

I think I would too.

Who wouldn't. I'd have stars in my eyes.

It's not so bad, I've seen even worse sequels, sequels I can't stand to watch. I watch and enjoy this sequel.

I agree. I liked it, and it seemed about as good as the original. Though, the entire fan base looks divided on it, but everyone agrees it’s better than the 2016 one.

@@WeylandYutaniCorp91 It's not that great, the first movie blows it away. It's like a 5 out of 10.

Same dude

😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣

i can't say it's better than the first. I thought the plot was a bit weak, but the characters are all back, and Bill Murry was fantastic in 2. But I still feel 1 is the better film.

@@GisherJohn24 it's alot better than people say. Definitely not better than 1, but not deserving of being thought of as a phoned in sequel

Look, GB2 is my favorite one since it’s the one that introduced me to GB. But the first one is unequivocally the better movie.

I like it, but compared to the original this really is the weaker film by a long way. When people say "the sequel is never as good." they are talking about films like this. Beat for beat repeat, but with less passion from those involved. But as I said, I still like it - the villain is great and that painting scared the shit out of me as kid.

I loved it in 89 and love in now. I still have the VHS.

😊💞

I would of killed to see this on the big screen. I was lucky to see the original in cinemas for the 35th anniversary, but I'd love to see GB2 on the big screen. my favourite. Too young to go see them in the cinema, but not too young to of been utterly obsessed with ghostbusters in the early 90s

I had to rent a theater for $100 on one of my birthday's because no theater has the balls to ever show this one.

Save the franchise? Not even close. For background, Jason's previous five films (2011's "Young Adult", 2013's "Labor Day", 2014's "Men, Women and Children", and 2018's "Tully" and "The Front Runner") all underperformed commercially, and "Afterlife" looks set to continue his "losing streak", considering what the film's up against, both in terms of the films released in the same time period AND the costs of the film. A film's budget (also called the "PRODUCTION budget") includes all costs relating to its development, production, and post-production, but production costs don't cover distribution and marketing, which adds another $35 million or so on average. Also, consider that movie theaters get roughly half of the profits from ticket sales, with the studio and/or distributor getting the other half. Given "Afterlife" 's $75 million PRODUCTION budget, hypothetical advertising budgets of $35 million, $37.5 million, and $50 million would bring the total cost of the film to $110 million, $112.5 million, and $125 million, respectively. Also, there will be extra costs to move the film away from the worst months of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic (the idiomatic "elephant in the room"), which happened 4 times in total. In those scenarios (which ignore the costs of Covid-related delays), "Afterlife" would have to gross at least $220 million, $225 million, and $250 million at the worldwide box office, respectively, to break even and become a commercial success. Taking into account the costs of Covid-related delays, "Afterlife" would have to gross at least $275 million dollars to break even commercially and become a success. The 2016 female reboot just got a bad rap, simple as that. It did reasonably well with critics, and the ladies of the reboot even stated that they were huge fans of the 1984 original film. It closely followed the fundamentals of the 1984 original, while also allowing for room to stand out in its own right, and it had its own tributes to deceased original cast member Harold Ramis, who passed away in 2014. Harold's son Daniel has a cameo as a metalhead, and his likeness is used on a bust outside Erin Gilbert's office. Unfortunately, it got caught in the crossfire of controversy, especially with the political climate of 2016 and whatnot, along with outrage from fans of the original films, who labelled the reboot as "sacrilegious".

⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️ 💀💀💀☠️☠️ R.I.P Harold Ramis!!!! Fans: 😭😭😭 No! Oh please God No!

It would've been cool if he'd also cameoed in Afterlife reprising his role.

And she is one herself, as she has a daughter named Charlotte (born in 1990) with husband Jim Simpson, and she is likely to become a grandmother too.

@@andrewbloom7637 He's talking about Aliens

@@chrispekel5709 I know that.

They didn’t say that. You’re a morahn

It’s almost exclusively implied they’re married

@@jahjohnson31 it is almost directly impiled

They are

The wedding rings 😁

and 7:08 this little girl is his sister katherine (working moms!)

As well as “Juno” and “Thank You For Smoking”

I actually kind of blame Aykroyd. He loves all the sci-fi / effects stuff, but it's really the camaraderie and character stuff that made the first movie so good and it gets lost in the sequel.

Yep the R.T.V.

If there’s something strange in your neighborhood who you gonna call? Ghostbusters!

​@@GhostbustersFrozenEmpire2024If there's something weird and it don't look good who you gonna call? Ghostbusters!

@@jaredruff9823 I anit afraid of no ghost

Really your favourite part is the ghostbusters 2 logo

Just a typical day in NYC.

And the colonel from Godzilla (1998).

Honest trailers fan

Ikr 😂

I valid point for sure and I agree to an extent because the movie does set it self up to be slower than the original but I think they genuinely tried to take a creative spin on the sequel and not just try to double the original formula

Let’s assume they were empty.