Powerful! May we meet in eternity, rocket scientist!

@@lookupromans109jesusiscomi4 yes please

Brilliant

God bless Mack for showing you that valuable lesson, God is wonderful in showing us his existence. He is everywhere you look 💙 thank you Jesus

@@ericgonzalez3317 Yes Eric that’s very true what you say. God is in the detail. He knew when I was a young lad I needed that dog. Sometimes the friendship of animals can be the necessary antidote of the day. But you’re right about the similarity of my loyal Mack and our loyalty to God. Yes it’s nice to be fiercely loyal to God. That’s our role.

That's because it was freezing cold that week. And sitting (or standing still) for 4 hours is difficult out there. 8-D

That is cool.

@@mitchellc4 LITERALLY THE NEXT FEW VERSES TELLS US THAT JESUS IS GOD. GO READ THE WHOLE CHAPTER!!! DONT TAKE JUST ONE VERSE.

@@mitchellc4 Philippians 2 6Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; 7 rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death _ even death on a cross! 9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. It makes sense. He humbled himself when He was on Earth. Even though He is God, He did not consider equality with God. Now He is exalted in the highest place. He set and example here on Earth. Now He is back to being God in Heaven.

​@@mitchellc4 You have been mislead. Jesus is God because the Father is God and John 10:30 clearly tells us that "I and the Father are one" so he claimed to be God.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 Revelation 1:8

@@leo-elfeo9141 That would be the Father Who is Jesus repeatedly referring to as “my God”? Rev 3 12 He who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God; never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name. Who is Peter and Paul referring to as “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”? Rom 15 6 that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Cor 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, 2 Cor 11 31 The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, he who is blessed for ever, knows that I do not lie. Eph 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 1 Pet 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

That’s his son? I thought it was some other priest or somethin

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 Jesus Christ is LORD and GOD 🙏😇

@@robertoarriola-bustamante9169 Who is his God? Who is Jesus repeatedly referring to as “my God”? Rev 3 12 He who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God; never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name. Who is Peter and Paul referring to as “the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ”? Rom 15 6 that together you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Cor 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and God of all comfort, 2 Cor 11 31 The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, he who is blessed for ever, knows that I do not lie. Eph 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 1 Pet 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

@@mitchellc4 God in the condition of a Man came as a SERVANT and being a Son of Man and Son of God had to Fulfilled the Law and pray to God, being a Hebrew under the Law he keeps it Whit out Sin , was a Sin offering for our Sins , being the Lamb of God as it is in the book of ISAIAH chapter 53

@@robertoarriola-bustamante9169 Jesus has a God right now in heaven, not “only when he was on earth” Rev 1 6 and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen. Rev 3 12 He who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God; never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name. Jesus has a God

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

Yeah... The creator of the creator

Sorry, I just had to point out. In science, theories explain natural phenomena. In order for a concept to become theory it has to go through rigorous scientific challenges and must hold its ground beyond any reasonable doubt. So, theory of evolution is the best possible explanation of the progress of life on earth. You're right that it isn't a law but that doesn't mean it has no proof.

Check out *Kent Hovind* on KZfaq. He has a lot of videos explaining how bogus evolutionism (ape to man) is. I have a few videos that expose how bogus evolutionism is on my channel. The guy in this video is totally wrong in claiming there is massive evidence for evolution.

A *SCIENTIFIC THEORY* is the highest standard that there is in science. It is not just someones hypotheses, but instead incorporates LAWS , and FACTS that are indisputable. And evidence that has to be peer reviewed and reproducible. Theories have to be able to predict future events or things we should find. And also be completely falsefiable. Scientists are encouraged and rewarded if they can disprove the current consensus, not punished for it as religion does. Do you think that doctors think the germ theory of disease is "just a theory" or the scientists working on the covid vacine think evolution "is just a theory" you remember covid it's that virus that keeps EVOLVING into new variants that's killed 800,000 plus americans. Next time your on a plane will you be thinking gravity is " just a theory" or maybe tell the people of Hiroshima that atomic theory is "just a theory" Does science have all the answers? Absolutely not nor does it claim to. But it is demonstrably the best method we have for getting as close to truth that we have. Can you give a BETTER more reliable method?? I find ironic that the standard for evidence of evolution you require is high , and yet. You readily accept that a rib can turn into a woman & and a clay figure can become a man . You believe in a book that purports, giants, witches, talking snakes and donkeys, MAGIC and zombies, that reads like a Harry Potter story. And was written by we dont know who or when exactly. Just that it was the work of ignorant superstitious primative tribesmen. And yet somehow your very otherwise demanding reasoning & logic accepts it all no problem. Even with your very obvious ignorance and incredulity I doubt that this would be possible without indoctrination. Or perhaps a desperate want and need for it to be true. Webster's definition of *scientific theory* 👇👇👇 below exposes your ignorance demonstrably *WEBSTERS DICTIONARY* HYPOTHESIS, THEORY, LAW mean a formula derived by inference from scientific data that explains a principle operating in nature. HYPOTHESIS implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative explanation. a hypothesis explaining the extinction of the dinosaurs *THEORY implies a greater range of evidence and greater likelihood of truth* *the theory of evolution LAW implies a statement of order and relation in nature that has been found to be invariable under the same conditions* the law of gravitation The Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is usually tentative; it's an assumption or suggestion made strictly for the objective of being tested. *A theory, in contrast, is a principle that has been formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data* *it is used in the names of a number of principles accepted in the scientific community, such as the Big Bang Theory.* *Because of the rigors of experimentation and control, it is understood to be more likely to be true than a hypothesis is.* In non-scientific use, however, hypothesis and theory are often used interchangeably to mean simply an idea, speculation, or hunch, with theory being the more common choice. *Since this casual use does away with the distinctions upheld by the scientific community, hypothesis and theory are prone to being wrongly interpreted even when they are encountered in scientific contexts-or at least, contexts that allude to scientific study without making the critical distinction that scientists employ when weighing hypotheses and theories.* The most common occurrence is when *theory is interpreted-and sometimes even gleefully seized upon-to mean something having less truth value than other scientific principles* (The word law applies to principles so firmly established that they are almost never questioned, such as the law of gravity.) This mistake is one of projection: since we use theory in general to mean something lightly speculated, then it's implied that scientists must be talking about the same level of uncertainty when they use theory to refer to their well-tested and reasoned principles. The distinction has come to the forefront particularly on occasions when the content of science curricula in schools has been challenged-notably, when a school board in Georgia put stickers on textbooks stating that evolution was "a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." As Kenneth R. Miller, a cell biologist at Brown University, has said, a theory "doesn’t mean a hunch or a guess. *A theory is a system of explanations that ties together a whole bunch of facts. It not only explains those facts, but predicts what you ought to find from other observations and experiments."* While theories are never completely infallible, they form the basis of scientific reasoning because, as Miller said "to the best of our ability, we’ve tested them, and they’ve held up." Two Related, Yet Distinct, Meanings of Theory There are many shades of meaning to the word theory. Most of these are used without difficulty, and we understand, based on the context in which they are found, what the intended meaning is. For instance, when we speak of music theory we understand it to be in reference to the underlying principles of the composition of music, and not in reference to some speculation about those principles. However, there are two senses of theory which are sometimes troublesome. These are the senses which are defined as “a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena” and “an unproven assumption; conjecture.” The second of these is occasionally misapplied in cases where the former is meant, *as when a particular scientific theory is derided as "just a theory," implying that it is no more than speculation or conjecture* One may certainly disagree with scientists regarding their theories, but *it is an inaccurate interpretation of language to regard their use of the word as implying a tentative hypothesis the scientific use of theory is quite different than the speculative use of the word*

Facts are always disputable. You lost in the first paragraph. Science is always changing and one day we'll get a complete fossil record and be like "oh yeah the pigs, elephants, whales, and zevras didn't evolve from the same animal after all.

@@dogelife7901 lol you do realise that the fossil record is but a tiny amount of the evidence we have for evolution. Please remind me, just what was your evidence for talking snakes & donkeys, tribes of giants, magic, witches, zombies, Angel's, virgin births, all oversee by a magic man in the sky.??? You believe mans origins lie in a mud figurine becoming a living breathing man and a rib becoming a woman 🤣😅🤣😅 Infact let's have a laugh that's my next question to you, just hold on a sec while I put a creatard dunce hat on 😂😂 Ok let's go How does a Rib become a woman? Do you have examples of any transitional fossils from said rib to woman.? If ribs can turn into women then why are there still ribs around ? Why do we not have examples of the RIB KIND turning into cat or dog kinds? How do you explain the second law of thermodynamics in regard to ribs, if we find less entropy In women ? Are ribs not irreducibly complex? Isn't it true that ribvolution is just a THEORY not a fact? If women are really ribs then why aren't they covered in barbecue sauce? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

Uhhhhh, ok...🤷‍♀️

I have several Bibles, and I have them at home, in my vehicle

And what do you conclude by the term trapped ? The Bible itself does not dispute dinasaurs it actually explains why God originally created them same as he created other animals if you need the scripture reference job chapter 40 describes behemoth a very large creature who only God can overcome with a tail like a cedar tree (huge tail obviously ) that eats grass (a herbavore)

@@memyselfandi4581 well not only on Job but also in Genesis. In Genesis God reveals to us exactly how He made everything that He made. Science completely and utterly contradicts what God says, so it is a matter of taking Gods word over mans word when it comes to evolution and the big bang and the age of creation (including earth).

​@@SlayingSinmisconception about science. Science does not disprove God. Science is the human mind's process to help make some sense of how God made everything work. Science is still struggling to come out with a full view of the laws of nature, but it comes close. Yet it does not disprove the existence of God, in fact the more we see how complex the universe is the more we realize that all of these are not random coincidences, that an intelligent mind is behind it all.

@@jhedjoardumago7691 strawman argument. You're comment is invalid.

@@SlayingSin your argument that science contradicts God is a baseless personal opinion but sure. Science is a process in how we try to understand God's process. Simple

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 Colossians 1:15-16

@@mitchellc4 in John 8:58 Jesus says "before Abraham was, I am". Not only does I am mean he exists eternally, but in the Old Testament this was uniqyely how God identified himself, God said to Moses "I am who I am, say to the people of Israel: I am has sent me to you". Obviously jews understood what Jesus claimed, since they wanted to stone him afterwards. There's also John 10:33, it's very clear.

So its basically like a subjective type of lifestyle. eh?

Well I would say to still pray for him that the Holy Spirit would work in his life, and not give up on his salvation so soon and just assume he will be in hell

Because again, you are powerless in convincing him. Apologetics never got anyone saved, the Holy Spirit working through people is the only thing that saves people. Never give up on our unsaved friends and loved ones

@@darkeen42 In fact, with regard to the scientific process there is no hierarchy between theory and law. A common misconception to be sure, so your error can be forgiven. A scientific theory explains why something happens, a scientific law is an observation of that happening occurring. Sorry that my original comment was confusing, hope this has helped to clarify it for you. Have a blessed day.

@@darkeen42 "a theory is why a response absolutely happens every time, anywhere across the universe." Well you're kinda right, but still wrong. Firstly, a theory is not absolute, and it's not meant to be. As human knowledge and understanding advances, theories can and have been adjusted accordingly (the relationship of Newton's gravity and Einstein's relativity comes to mind). That's the whole point and beauty of science. For example, there's no way any human could know that the scientific theory of evolution absolutely happens every time, anywhere in the universe. Though I'm sure with the intellect you've displayed here, you already understood that, and just merely misspoke. I hope this has helped, and again, have a blessed day.

Convinced... or just believes what the evolutionists have told them and accepted their 'interpretations' of the evidence uncritically?

It's insane that they call it scientific. There is no evidence at all. Fossils date the rocks, rock layers date the fossils. If only there was an explanation for multiple amounts of layers to build up quickly...like a world wide catastrophe that would kill every animal like dinosaurs.

But he said that Richard Dawkins says evolution explains abiogenesis!!!

As a young Earth creationist I have to set aside my perspective, knowing he is an old Earth creationist. For the value of his other content. It makes it hard when he speaks on evolution. What choice does he have? Hard to defend his argument against evolution holding an old Earth view. It seems to be his weak link. I don't like when it enters the conversation but hopefully it will strengthen his resolve in this area

@@landofthefree2023 I agree here. I'm not sure I've heard him ever explain why he is an old Earth Creationist. I would like to hear why he believes this. Two reasons I am young earth is: 1. Bible is trustworthy as the inerrant Word and God's creation is explained clearly in Genesis. 2. If you extrapolate on Earth's population growth rate and the rate that technology has advanced throughout history, it would be a stretch to come to the conclusion that humans have been on earth for millions of years.

@@mitchellc4 Lord Jesus Christ is God. You say He isn't, but you can only conclude that He isn't God, if you are ignorant of what He said and the prophecies surrounding His first and second coming. He said, "I am THE way, THE truth, and THE life. That no one comes to the Father except by Me." He also tells His apostles, whenever they call Him God, that they are correct. He tells the pharisees numerous times that He is God, to which they attempt to imprison Him, stone Him, and is the very reason why they crucified Him. Lord Jesus Christ also said the Scriptures and the prophets testify of Him, meaning He is claiming that the Scriptures and the prophets are talking about Him being God. In the Old Testament, we see in a few places (Deuteronomy, Provervs, Isaiah, Malachi, and others) that there is only One God and God ALONE is the Savior, they also say that there is only One Who is Lord. In Isaiah and Malachi He is called Immanuel, which means 'God with us'. Everything in the bible points to Lord Jesus Christ, Who is God in the flesh, the King of kings and the Lord of lords.

@@landofthefree2023 when I first became saved, I wanted to stick with what science says, but after a few dreams, after a few readings of Genesis, after a few convictions from the Holy Spirit to trust God at His word, I can only conclude that Gsod is right and science (mankind) is wrong. The earth is indeed young, about 6000-7000 years, and this lines up with Scripture and common sense based on simple observation. That God did not use evolution to make anything, even if it is possible for Him to have done, He didn't do it.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

That's not how it looks from over here lol

@@nicolab2075 because u to slow to understand how god works and that’s just sad that u blind

@@octaneswagg Is god not accessible to people who are not bright?

@@nicolab2075 if u don’t open up you’re heart to him no why ??? Because u stoping him from helping u and u stoping him from doing his work

Don't tell this to atheist. Because evolution and atheism is not a religion it's just something they believe in. Religion requires faith and they don't have faith they just have belief. Otherwise you could be labeled as an ignorant bigot

@@landofthefree2023 to believe something though is to have faith in it

@@HonestlyTho-ThePodcastShow Yes! You see that too? An Atheist seems unable to make that connection.

@@landofthefree2023 they are too bound in sin...check out "reasoning with unbelievers" on KZfaq, it's about 2 hours long

@@HonestlyTho-ThePodcastShow I will definitely check that out. Thanks for the tip. A side note: belief would also require the use of a mind. Atheist claim only to have a brain not a mind.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

Yes, it's a selfish request

It's the moving goal post that makes asking for extraordinary evidence a turn off to intellectual conversations. Because people like you will only fully believe something until the whole secrets of the universe is shown to you, yet you trust that your friends really like you and you do not explore their brains scientifically for proof. You guys move the goal post so you'll feel like you are winning at an argument while in reality it's the last resort of someone losing and can't back it up, so they just keep backing up. But when asked if they can live out their extreme skepticism in simple forms, they can't. Because extreme skepticism is only used as emergency escape buttons when cornered.

@@jhedjoardumago7691 Is this at me? Because I don't need to know all the secrets of the universe to be certain that God exist. I understand and I 'am fine with not knowing everything about my friends and family to know they love me? I believe there is enough evidence that I know and don't know yet that points to a creator. I'm in agreement with your comment I hate when people move the goal post as well?

@@tdog4153 Agreed because extreme evidence searching is just a tool used to escape a question. I mistook your take at extraordinary evidence because a personal limit to how much is enough evidence is subjective, but as you clarified that it seems we're on the same page lol

Numbers 6:24-26 King James Version (KJV) 24 The Lord bless thee, and keep thee: 25 The Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee: 26 The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.

Aero Zeppelin love it 😊

The chiropractors of science.

He's pretty smart. And I all lost bought into it and cliffe didnt really answer that question directly although indirectly he did. But yes it still doesn't answer so who created the rock? Who allowed it to evolve.

And further why aren't rock and inanimate matter producing life today? Was it a one in a zillion chance? In other words based on the evidence, that would be a miracle outside the realm of what we understand is physically possible.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 Somebody forgot their meds..

@@51elephantchang and you forgot to read the bible

@@TheKingdomOfHeavenIsAtHand333 Wrong that is one of the reasons I am an atheist.

@@51elephantchangI love that you answered a comment from three years ago god bless you

That sounds really fun. He is a really good storyteller as well. Love hearing his stories particularly about books, movies, and history

Amen 🙏 bless you for standing up for truth

The Brit thinks everything he believes is material, and without question.

@@Brucev7 He's a naturalist, eg. only what my senses can measure exists.

@@ninjason57 oui

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 Buddy, read John 17 again. And please read in context, do not post a single verse, thats the first mistake. The chapters heading literally says "Jesus prays to be glorified". Even the verse you have pointed and if you continue up to verse 5 says "3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. 4 I have brought you glory on earth by finishing the work you gave me to do. 5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began" Notice Jesus says , "with the glory i had with you before the world begun". Jesus obviously claimed to be God . He in fact was put to death for it. But He defeated death so yes He cannot die, he actually did not because He is still alive. Look at john 8 from verse 48 which is titled 'Jesus' claims about Himself " . it says - "48 The Jews answered him, “Aren’t we right in saying that you are a Samaritan and demon-possessed?” 49 “I am not possessed by a demon,” said Jesus, “but I honor my Father and you dishonor me. 50 I am not seeking glory for myself; but there is one who seeks it, and he is the judge. 51 Very truly I tell you, whoever obeys my word will never see death.” 52 At this they exclaimed, “Now we know that you are demon-possessed! Abraham died and so did the prophets, yet you say that whoever obeys your word will never taste death. 53 Are you greater than our father Abraham? He died, and so did the prophets. Who do you think you are?” 54 Jesus replied, “If I glorify myself, my glory means nothing. My Father, whom you claim as your God, is the one who glorifies me. 55 Though you do not know him, I know him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and obey his word. 56 Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.” 57 “You are not yet fifty years old,” they said to him, “and you have seen Abraham!” 58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” 59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds

Fred Kimani Jesus said before Abraham was born “ego eimi” which means I am he Multiple people say ego eimi in the New Testament, but you’re not saying they are God? The blind man who was healed said it John 9 9 Some said, “It is he”; others said, “No, but he is like him.” He said, “I am the man.” I am the man= ego eimi The blind man just said ego eimi, did he just refer to Exodus and claim to be God?? Of course not I believe in the Greek translation of Exodus it says “Ego eimi HO ON” Tell them “HO ON” has sent you (I Am has sent you) Had Jesus said HO ON you may have a point, but he didn’t

Mitchell C context brother , brother . When someone someone says “before Abraham I am “ they do not mean the same as what john meant . You have to read in context and in relation to the discussion, just like you do in any normal conversation or when reading any book . You cannot cherry pick .

Fred Kimani Pretty much every time Jesus says I am he, he is saying he’s the Messiah Who is the God of Jesus??? Eph 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 1 Pet 1 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

If I told you that a tornado that plows through a junkyard could assemble a fully functioning 747, a piece of machinery that contains ~6 million parts, you would tell me that it's impossible (or at the very least statistically improbable, which in reality means impossible), regardless of how much time is given. And lets not forget he law of entropy, that when moving forward in time in a closed system (and we would have to say that the universe is a closed system because...what is outside of it?), order becomes less ordered. This is an observable principle. The house that I was born in, if nobody ever lived in it after I moved away and nobody ever kept it up (i.e. putting in energy into it from outside the system), it would fall apart and turn into dust. Now consider that even a single human cell contains around 100 trillion atoms, that all need to be arranged in specific geometries for it to survive and function properly, with interconnected systems that all rely on all the other systems in order for it to survive...So you would not be willing to believe that an airplane could be assembled in a tornado, even if it had a quintillion years to do so...and yet with something many orders of magnitude more complex, you would be willing to believe happened spontaneously and without need for intelligence? If you spoke to any programmer about what would happen to a fully functioning piece of code he had written if he randomly changed a single 1 or 0 in it, he would tell you that it wouldn't function anymore as designed. Now imagine you keep doing that over and over again (representing transcription errors in a dna strand), what is the likeliness that piece of code would suddenly work better than the original? Or even work at all for that matter? There have been studies on this idea. For an average size protein of ~300 amino acids, for ever 1 functioning combination of those amino acids, there are 10^77 combinations that are either non-functional or quite frankly harmful. So again, statistically improbable (i.e. impossible).

@@douglasmcnay644 which point would you like me to respond to? I refuse to enter into a dialogue around 12 things simultaneously

@@douglasmcnay644 yes it truly takes a massive amount of faith to not believe God created it all!

God DID create things better. When man/woman chose to distance themself from God and choose their own way, things went south pretty quickly from there. This is why everything may seem like chaos, but there is already a plan. We are given a broken sinful world but God in his wisdom allows a way to rise above our bodily desires in his son, the living embodiment of God. Those who have faith in the son and believe will enter the kingdom not when they die, but in their lives today through spiritual peace and loving relationships.

Correct. Without examples or context, extraordinary can mean different things to different people.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

I know right!! The phrase "extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence" has always struck me as odd as cliff said "evidence is evidence" regardless of the claim be it extraordinary claims or rare claims or common claims which evidence by its definition is simply what it is "evidence" so to taf on "extrodinary" only keeps someone from seeing evidence because they arent looking for evidence they are looking for "extraordinary evidence" but they don't even know what they are looking for

@@maow9240 Hmm. If I told you I had a sandwich for lunch would you believe me? You would probably believe that claim simply based on the evidence that I said I had a sandwich for lunch. If I told you I could fly would you believe it? Would you believe it if I showed a video?

"There is no such thing as extraordinary evidence." Agreed, there is no evidence pretty much at all to support the stories in the bible.

@@170221dn everything takes faith my friend even believing in evidence. A while back a guy robbed a bank wearing a mask and sunglasses. This masked looked just like a real guy who was later arrested for the robbery leaving the real robber to go free. The video footage showed the robbers "face" to which the mother of the innocent man who the mask looked like even said thats her son on the video but it really wasnt. If it wasnt for the real robbers girlfriend calling the cops to say they got the wrong guy an innocent man would have been charged all because of the evidence so even evidence itself takes faith. And as far as you say saying "there is no evidence pretty much at all to support the stories of the bible" then you need more research. There is more evidence for the information in the bible then people wanna give credit for and there is even extra biblical evidence of Jesus and his miracles which has him being called a "sorcerer" so there is evidence ita just you like the faith unlike the innocent man who almost got charges with robbery where everyone including the guys mother had faith in the evidence

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

Actually I need evidence to prove that we came from nothing both our faith issues you have to have faith to believe in evolution and I believe it came from nothing and they're both relational I also have faith in a Creator knowing that is someone powerful actually I need evidence to prove that we came from nothing both their faith issues you have to have faith to believe in evolution and I believe it we came from nothing and they're both relational I also have faith and a Creator knowing that is so one powerful of the supernatural who's the one who designed all of the time space and matter the physics and biology and everything involved to making everything creating everything helping everything to stay existing Etc. That at least shows me that there's someone that is about all of this you had to have someone to make all the other things so one has an eternal being versus if you believe in nothing then you can't believe in evolution you can only have Eeveelution are some people pronounce it by the evolution when you have a process continually changing yes in micro-evolution which does exist that has common sense macro-evolution you cannot have and that's the kind of Illusion that people are saying is how we got here in the first place because if there was literally nothing no atoms no time nor space no matter its cetera you can't have even a star to explode or you can't have like a little teeny. With all of the genetic information or structure information for the entire universe to that explode as a big bang and make everything because if there's nothing you can't have anything not even the spark the Big Bang but if we have a Creator, now you can debate whether or not which Creator did it or how he did it but you cannot debate whether this a Creator or not because you can't get something from nothing as I said where did the spark if there was a big bang or how did the first things ever make how did Thai space and matter develop and so forth It's not logical its circular reasoning in their arguments to go back and forth and makes no sense and they're both a matter of Faith even though I believe science can prove it not enough to make people satisfied which is why I called the faith issue because scientists / especially evolutionist That can't prove something happier than therefore believe it in faith even a theory is a faith-based science until you physically can prove it and repeat it.

GOD turning dirt into life (Genesis 2:7) and or GOD using dirt to a man who was born blind (John 9:1,11) see were clear demonstration that HE is GOD who set and can defy the Laws of physics.

To God you as a 73 yr old and I as a 22 yr old are still children. Relationship with God is a journey that requires talking and listening and I as a foolish young man am still trying, but I am also facing battles as well. God loves you sir 😊

Read the Bible. Find a local church. Search the scriptures for answers to your questions because I promise you, they are there. I recommend the sermons of Jeff Durbin at apologia church. 73 years is nothing in comparison to eternity in fellowship with our Lord and savior. God bless!!

I prey you find the Love of Jesus

When does Cliffe state actual evidence?

Just google it, “NDE study”, and the third link for me had a study of over 2000 people about their NDE.

@@braedenmyers7969 Thanks I did a google search and found nothing to support the claims never mind 300 studies. Interestingly there is a one million dollar prize for someone that could prove what Cliffe’s son claims yet not one of the 300 sources has applied for this. Strange? Funny how these supernatural and superstitious claims are all anecdotal? Never actually factually probable.

Look up Dr. Bruce Greyson study at Duke.. He wrote a book called "After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal About Life and Beyond".. Also check out "Light and Death" by Dr. Michael Sabom on NDE's..

@@kb6175 I don’t have access to those books but I did find an article where the first doctor you mentioned acknowledged that these events are not well evidenced. Similar to tales of alien encounters.

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

BILLIONS!

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has a God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@@mitchellc4 was Jesus the only teacher preaching this message?

A child of the Light John the Baptist The Apostles

@@mitchellc4 John was the messenger sent ahead of the Father. Jesus was to come to John, whom within the both was the Father. 🤗 Jesus came with truth, although John had the truth also, why would a man listen to John? Jesus was planned to be listened to.

@@mitchellc4 point being... if you have the truth, I can listen to you, but I need to know also where the truth came from... then i choose to take it or leave it. Which rabbit hole shall I go down to find what I need to be in the light. Only when you have found the light then you will know.... what you will know is something belived to be the light for a moment until another.... then another..... finding the true source is a journey that not many will find for a very long time over many lives.

For whom? As in who would get destroyed?

@@varuna6089 Matt would destroy him as he does every theist, actually there is a group debate with the two of them in it

@@Adam-gl1qv That would be interesting to watch. I just came across these Clive videos this morning and after watching a few of them, I think he's full of shit to be honest. I don't mean to be disrespectful but there is simply no evidence that points towards a higher power or a God. And thats that.

@@varuna6089 theres a group debate about slavery in the bible between Matt and Clive, look it up. Clive comes across fairly well when debating young students but when faced with a mind like Matt's he is simply shown up to be the deluded individual that he is.

@@Adam-gl1qv Thanks for the recommendation. I'll definitely look it up. Theists need to wake up and see the world as it actually is and start demanding some real evidence for themselves. Sadly, I know that won't ever happen as they are far too deluded.

A *SCIENTIFIC THEORY* is the highest standard that there is in science. It is not just someones hypotheses, but instead incorporates LAWS , and FACTS that are indisputable. And evidence that has to be peer reviewed and reproducible. Theories have to be able to predict future events or things we should find. And also be completely falsefiable. Scientists are encouraged and rewarded if they can disprove the current consensus, not punished for it as religion does. Do you think that doctors think the germ theory of disease is "just a theory" or the scientists working on the covid vacine think evolution "is just a theory" you remember covid it's that virus that keeps EVOLVING into new variants that's killed 800,000 plus americans. Next time your on a plane will you be thinking gravity is " just a theory" or maybe tell the people of Hiroshima that atomic theory is "just a theory" Does science have all the answers? Absolutely not nor does it claim to. But it is demonstrably the best method we have for getting as close to truth that we have. Can you give a BETTER more reliable method?? I find ironic that the standard for evidence of evolution you require is high , and yet. You readily accept that a rib can turn into a woman & and a clay figure can become a man . You believe in a book that purports, giants, witches, talking snakes and donkeys, MAGIC and zombies, that reads like a Harry Potter story. And was written by we dont know who or when exactly. Just that it was the work of ignorant superstitious primative tribesmen. And yet somehow your very otherwise demanding reasoning & logic accepts it all no problem. Even with your very obvious ignorance and incredulity I doubt that this would be possible without indoctrination. Or perhaps a desperate want and need for it to be true. Webster's definition of *scientific theory* 👇👇👇 below exposes your ignorance demonstrably *WEBSTERS DICTIONARY* HYPOTHESIS, THEORY, LAW mean a formula derived by inference from scientific data that explains a principle operating in nature. HYPOTHESIS implies insufficient evidence to provide more than a tentative explanation. a hypothesis explaining the extinction of the dinosaurs *THEORY implies a greater range of evidence and greater likelihood of truth* *the theory of evolution LAW implies a statement of order and relation in nature that has been found to be invariable under the same conditions* the law of gravitation The Difference Between Hypothesis and Theory A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review. You ask a question, read up on what has been studied before, and then form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is usually tentative; it's an assumption or suggestion made strictly for the objective of being tested. *A theory, in contrast, is a principle that has been formed as an attempt to explain things that have already been substantiated by data* *it is used in the names of a number of principles accepted in the scientific community, such as the Big Bang Theory.* *Because of the rigors of experimentation and control, it is understood to be more likely to be true than a hypothesis is.* In non-scientific use, however, hypothesis and theory are often used interchangeably to mean simply an idea, speculation, or hunch, with theory being the more common choice. *Since this casual use does away with the distinctions upheld by the scientific community, hypothesis and theory are prone to being wrongly interpreted even when they are encountered in scientific contexts-or at least, contexts that allude to scientific study without making the critical distinction that scientists employ when weighing hypotheses and theories.* The most common occurrence is when *theory is interpreted-and sometimes even gleefully seized upon-to mean something having less truth value than other scientific principles* (The word law applies to principles so firmly established that they are almost never questioned, such as the law of gravity.) This mistake is one of projection: since we use theory in general to mean something lightly speculated, then it's implied that scientists must be talking about the same level of uncertainty when they use theory to refer to their well-tested and reasoned principles. The distinction has come to the forefront particularly on occasions when the content of science curricula in schools has been challenged-notably, when a school board in Georgia put stickers on textbooks stating that evolution was "a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things." As Kenneth R. Miller, a cell biologist at Brown University, has said, a theory "doesn’t mean a hunch or a guess. *A theory is a system of explanations that ties together a whole bunch of facts. It not only explains those facts, but predicts what you ought to find from other observations and experiments."* While theories are never completely infallible, they form the basis of scientific reasoning because, as Miller said "to the best of our ability, we’ve tested them, and they’ve held up." Two Related, Yet Distinct, Meanings of Theory There are many shades of meaning to the word theory. Most of these are used without difficulty, and we understand, based on the context in which they are found, what the intended meaning is. For instance, when we speak of music theory we understand it to be in reference to the underlying principles of the composition of music, and not in reference to some speculation about those principles. However, there are two senses of theory which are sometimes troublesome. These are the senses which are defined as “a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena” and “an unproven assumption; conjecture.” The second of these is occasionally misapplied in cases where the former is meant, *as when a particular scientific theory is derided as "just a theory," implying that it is no more than speculation or conjecture* One may certainly disagree with scientists regarding their theories, but *it is an inaccurate interpretation of language to regard their use of the word as implying a tentative hypothesis the scientific use of theory is quite different than the speculative use of the word*

Yes it is "JUST" a theory but is is a working one in terms of what we can observe and test. Where it all apart is when it starts to conjecture about the thing unseen, that cross-species evolution can happen, which has never been observed and never will be. The second part is that every animal could not have come from one. DNA is programming and the program isn't written to offshoot species. We can see small changes Within species but dogs will always be dogs no matter how many thousand of years they are bred or adapt to their environment. Ther is also the problem of creating new parts such as lungs, eyes, ears, working nervous system, brains, etc with simple random chance guiding or at least overseeing the process. That is some amazing programming for their being no programmer. It would take not just billions of years for these small adaptations to create entire new species, but zillions and zillions of years based in what we have observed since recorded history. That would push the estimated dates back by a factor of millions.

@@dogelife7901 lol you have no idea what evolution even is ha ha ha 🤣😅🤣😅 _"random chance guiding the process"_ ????? Lol genetic mutations are random, but the process that acts upon them "natural selection " most certainly is not. DNA is NOT _"programming"_ A computer program precisely defines a process, a set of steps to execute. The process encoded by a computer program is typically called an algorithm. An algorithm is seldom a straightforward list of steps. In addition to being extraordinarily detailed, it is also full of loops and conditional branches. A loop is when the algorithm repeats a certain set of steps over and over. A conditional branch is when the algorithm tests a certain condition, and then - based on the results of that test - either continues forward or jumps to a different point in the process. There are countless biochemical processes going on within the human body at all times, each contributing to the development and maintenance of that body. These processes certainly involve a lot of looping and branching, and therefore they could validly be compared to the algorithms encoded in a complex computer program. The problem with this analogy is that *these processes are not actually encoded in our DNA* The language of DNA does not contain codes to indicate the start or the end of a loop, nor when a branch should occur, nor what test to perform when a branch point is reached, nor where in the instructions to jump based on the results of that test. Worse yet for our computer program analogy, there are no DNA codes for any of the individual steps in any of these thousands of biochemical processes. DNA is not capable of representing or communicating the steps in any of these processes. DNA is, for the most part, just a set of lists that specify sequences of amino acids. Therefore DNA is not like a computer program at all. 😜

@@dogelife7901 Frequently, uneducated believers in irreducible complexity like you cite the eye as an example of something too complex to have evolved. They frequently introduce the argument with a question of the type, "What use is half an eye?". However if the question is recast as "Given a choice, would you prefer to be completely blind or have 50% of your present vision?", then it becomes clear that the question is badly formed, especially when keeping in mind that many species manage to survive with significantly less-advanced eyes. Examples include the polychaete worms, which can distinguish between light and dark; the simple eye-cup of the flatworms, for finding the direction of a light source; jellyfish and scallops, with simple eyes for detecting movement;the famous compound eyes of the insects, which can make out simple shapes, and ultimately the sophisticated single-lens eyes of the molluscs and vertebrates. (1) Light-sensitive proteins could evolve through a random mutation and re-use pre-existing cascade structures to signal other proteins and activate the cell. Natural selection would prefer organisms which do something useful with this mutation, such as improving the feeding pattern (i.e., during the day food may be more abundant, so conserving energy during the night would be advantageous). (2) If one cell is evolutionary advantageous, then several cells may be more advantageous due to redundancy and due to the higher probability of successfully perceiving light. (3) A flat patch of cells can be slightly improved by the curving of some of the outer cells creating a small depressed area, which allows some amount of sense of where the light is coming from. (4) Said depression can depress further until there is only a small slit of light coming in. This allows a more complex "picture" to be seen, rather than the more binary "light yes/no" of the flat patch and the "light on this side yes/no" of the depressed patch. (5) Said depression may be covered by a membrane that would magnify the light coming in, which has obvious benefits. (6) Muscles to move the "half eye" around would allow greater field of vision and more accurate determination of the source of the light. (7) Detecting basic colors is more useful than detecting no colors (e.g., "is that the toxic blue flower or the edible yellow flower?"). (8) The ability to control the size of the slit (even a little bit) and its magnifier is useful to refocus and get just a little better vision at certain distances. And with that, the hypothetical eye would be reasonably similar to the eye possessed by most mammals today.

I can prove God exist. Are you living and existing?

@@bond3161 - I think, therefore I am..... but... that doesnt prove any Gods exist. Did you want to share your evidence?

@@lordfraybin where you come from. Humanity. And nah I was just trolling. Just trying to pry answers I think cliffe provides plenty of evidence. Not proof. Just as you might be living in a matrix. You cant prove we are in reality. But evidence. Seems to be there, historical mind you of historical chrisitbaity Then questions of.god Then there

Outrageous 20, exactly, there is obviously proof of microevolution not macro and there are some changes that happen now genetically because of the things we've done to the environment or naturally the changes that happen for other occurrences but God did not use Evolution he may have used the Big Bang we don't know for sure but that very well could be what are use that's how you get something from nothing because God is eternal however after he spoke no space into existence in this cetera then from there on out you do have the way he formed man Out of the Dust vs. He spoke the animals into existence he spoke the plant the plants and stuff into existence and from there on out then you've got the micro evolutions for the normal growth process and changing process especially because of either genetics time frame is changing with the ozone being what it is is because of drugs bad water what we eat what we don't eat etc etc etc and the animals do learn to adapt that's why does microevolution and then there were a lot of what people call Evolutions that are not Guess the Animal actually loses something and I do like how some people put that if you're losing something are you really actually evolving or you going backwards or Dee evolving I would say you're doing that.

@@godislove363 Well I think you're also using the same scientific logical fallacy as cliff and adding to the word of God by suggesting that God could have used big bang while there's no scripture in the Bible that hints to that. The book of genesis clearly tells you how everything was created, which is all we need to know without paying attention to scientific explanation as to how it actually happened. certain scientific words like 'Evolution, Big bang and macro evolution' are not found in the Bible they're are not even more than 300 year old. 'Micro evolution' are just mere changes in animals to help them to adapt and that has nothing to do with evolution and finally, I don't know of any proof illustrating that an animal at a certain point lost its organs and if any I'd be delighted if you could point any.

@@godislove363 If you try to merge science and the word of God you'll end up confused. For starters, no known explosion causes order as we see the intricate designed order that God has laid out so that alone disqualifies the big bang claim. It's a luciferian masonic philosophy that holds no water when compared to the word of God. Secondly, no known scientific explanation can explain the mechanical nature of how God actually created the heavens and the earth because you'd have to be God to know that. We should just stick to what his word says and leave alone the wisdom of men or science so falsely called. Lastly when the Bible says 'he stretches the heavens and the earth' in simple layman English understanding, there's no way that could mean explosion. You just have to take the Bible literally and leave out imaginations because our human knowledge is so limited its like 0% as compared to 100% and if that's the case then how could any man know the mysteries of thus universe unless God reveals to him... Which he actually does through his word. The Bible.

@@freightshayker sorry my last comment was addressed to you but I tagged the other person mistakenly

@@freightshayker Thanks for clearing that up but I was leaning more towards the naturalistic idea which is claimed by almost all scientists that they can explain how everything came to be.. Which is that 'Nothing created everything'. Nevertheless I got your point loud and clear.

I had to listen to this again, Cliffe did say he would believe if the evidence did say we came from a single celled organism, but that still does not disprove God. So they are not talking past each other, Cliffe would believe if the evidence said so, but the young man would not believe no matter the evidence given about God. So re-watch and listen carefully.

@@souzajustin19d The evidence DOES say life diversified from a single celled organism. This would be true even if it was a god that is the origin of the evolutionary process. But cliffs refuses to believe. Now I am an atheist and although I do not know specifically what would convince me of gods existence I can say this...... If your God exists and is omnipotent and omniscient he would know precisely what would convince me and have the power to provide it . YET I AM UNCONVINCED.. 🤔 Therefore I can draw two conclusions... (1) God does not want me to know he exists or (2) God infact does NOT exist . Either way that's not my problem.

@@trumpbellend6717 Science is about repeatability, if you cant repeat it, its not science and have no scientific evidence. So what type of evidence are you presenting to argue your claim? are you appealing to philosophy?

@@souzajustin19d Cant repeat it ?? What are you talking about, evolution or aboigenis ?

@@trumpbellend6717 you can't go back in time or in a test lab to create life from nothing. You can't test it or repeat it. So the claim all organisms evolved from some primal source is a baseless claim.

Yes but we have Jesus who saved us for our sins

im saying for the people that havent accept jesus as their saver

😷 is of the 👿

Heh, clearly this was filmed before COVID19.

I’d say they got months and months of these in the archives. This was probably about a year or so ago.

@@PaulRizzo They did quite a lot of videos from home lately so I thought this was new but yeah you could be right

@Bobbeh Hill OK thanks for the info

Lol I do not dismiss the idea of a god because I "dont like it " 🤣😅 I dismiss it because there has been no evidence presented to justify such a belief. Do you dismiss the idea of pink unicorns or Thor , Zeus, Mohammed, because you " don't like the idea " ?? Or would that just be me, strawmaning and misrepresenting your position ? 🤔

Yeah but Matt Dillahunty and the crew are science illiterate and would never talk about in a debate. They would get exposed so bad on the very subject of evolution that they believe in. They screen their calls on the show for the easiest callers and never allow the calls that expose them to get aired.

@@YoungEarthCreation Can you prove that?

@@170221dn Of course I can, watch this video as they not only are ignorant on basic Physics but mock it for being boring kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kJ5lrL1ymsvSdH0.html then you can see we at SFT have all challenged him to debate and what does he do? Dodges and makes excuses being to busy but then accepts debates against pathetic people he knows will make him look good. He just last week Dodges John Maddox kzfaq.info/love/LasHSpihyMAoXAM4lkRhlQ who is part of our team. It was hilarious, he used the exact same excuse that someone used against him a week prior. You cant make this stuff up. So funny. Remember when Matt D. Talked all brave against Vegan Gains and then backed out? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLKUbKpot7a9c2g.html a common theme when he gets a hard opponent and we will show his total ignorance on evolution theory which he always talks about on his show as opposition against Creation. I will ask him 3 basic questions and you will watch him try to change the subject, watch. The guy is far from a guru, he is a joke to anyone who has education.

@@YoungEarthCreation Sorry are you saying you don’t understand evolution?

@@170221dn sadly better than those who teach it.

You clearly have no idea what evolution even is. Please give YOUR definition and why you think it fails. ?? This should be fun I studied biology but my younger brother probably wrote many of the papers you will attempt to misrepresent and quote mine. He is a cellular molecular physiologist and was at cold spring harbour in the 90s when Watson ( of DNA fame was there ) he now works as a biological agents inspector for the government here in the uk supervising the safety of amongst other things covid research. You remember covid dont you it's that pesky virus that keeps EVOLVING into new varients😜 Anyway if we get stuck I'm sure he will help us out. My guess is though that you wont want to discuss the *230* endoginous retroviruses we have in common with chimps , each individually identifiable, Each one in the exact same 1 in 10 million to one locations in the genome, or the fact that they can only become endoginous and part of the genome by the infecting of the specific *Sperm that goes on to reproduce* so can only be inherited from a direct ancestor 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔 Nor will you wish to discuss how these ERVs are found in a vertically nested hierarchy throughout all life. Or how this enables us to predict PRECISELY which ERVS will be found and also which wont when sequencing the genome of a creature for the first time. You wont have any explanation as to why we can construct family trees using only the ERVS present and overlay this perfectly onto those made using earlier classification methods. This gives us the ability to be able to understand lineages and pinpoint when divergence occurs leading to new species. You wont want to discuss epigenics and the chemical interactions that occur in the creatine that modify gene expression and transcription without altering the genetic code itself through methylation or histone modification will you soft lad ??? Maybe you will try the long debunked irreducible complexity BS of what use is half and eye ect . Or maybe you will go for proborbility ( what's the chances of this protien arising naturally ect ) with a remake of the tornado in a junkyard garbage . I know, 💥 you will try the "no new information "or "beneficial mutations" blah blah or perhaps that DNA is a real code and codes need a programmer ##### No my best guess is that in your ignorance and incredulity you will go down the old " we have never seen one "kind" turn into another "kind " BS without giving any definition of a "kind" or making it so vague and ambiguous it would be impossible to identify or classify using it. Then when presented with one of the many examples of speciation we have observed you will cry out " ITS STILL THE SAME " KIND " 🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅 and you will no doubt just then continue endlessly moving the goal post with each example presented. You will avoid at all costs even addressing the evidence ( or lack of to be correct ) that a mud figurine can become a living breathing man or a rib becoming a woman. Nope your skepticism and critical thinking suddenly no longer applies for this does it 🤔 Infact let's have a laugh that's my next question to you, just hold on a sec while I put a creatard dunce hat on 😂😂 Ok let's go How does a Rib become a woman? Do you have examples of any transitional fossils from said rib to woman.? If ribs can turn into women then why are there still ribs around ? Why do we not have examples of the RIB KIND turning into cat or dog kinds? How do you explain the second law of thermodynamics in regard to ribs, if we find less entropy In women ? Are ribs not irreducibly complex? Isn't it true that ribvolution is just a THEORY not a fact? If women are really ribs then why aren't they covered in barbecue sauce? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

How does a rib become woman? God created Adam first, found he needed a mate and made it happen. Just imagine God is like Iron Man snapping his finger with the infinity gauntlet of that helps, he's cool like that. Do you have any evidence of transitional fossils from rib to woman? No evolutionary process would be necessary. Its coming straight from the source of life, the Alpha, thus there would be no death or fossil as with the nasty evolutionary fumbling of species-slaughter across the planet. Why do we not have examples of the rib kind turning into the cat or dog kind? Because again God doesn't need evolution to create from rib, and once he did there would be significant change of rib turned woman through an ape-like intermediary. Just women birthing women. And men, but not any other kinds because that is utter nonsense. How do you explain the second law of thermodynamics in ribs, if we find less entropy in women? Do we find less entropy in women? As far as I know men and women, ribs included both entropy about the same rate. Are ribs not irreducibly complex? Complex for humans is basic marhs for God, but jim being the master of time, space, and matter, and already having created one human from dirt, it should be a cakewalk to form another being from the rib. Things always get easier after you've done it once. Isn't it true that ribvolution is a theory not a fact? There is a preponderance of evidence for ribvolution. One needs simply pick up any Bible, which predates the scientific theory itself and is the most published, peer-reviewed book known to man and rib, it's in the first few paragraphs. If women are really ribs why aren't they covered in barbecue sauce? One woman was a rib. Now they have ribs, but we can eat ribs as long as it's not human ribs, because that is cannibalism, and is frowned on in most cultures

@@dogelife7901 lol @ the Adam & eve BS, I fear my comment went so far over your head you needs step ladder. How could anyone really believe that a god decided that the best way for him to be able to forgive man, for being evil & immoral by breaking rules that god knew in advance that they would break when he made those rules and created evil. Was to send a version of himself down to earth then sacrifice himself to himself. Thus preventing his need to punish his creations for something their ancestors did before they knew the difference between right and wrong. 🤔 ??????? ☝️☝️ I mean just actually think about that for a minute 🤔🤔🤔 This has to be THE most illogical ideology imaginable, it fails on just about every conceivable level. But then again I supose that's to be expected when its origins lie in the myths , knowledge, and world views of superstitious, uneducated, primative, child sacrificing, tribesmen. But I digress, so anyway just who is it that gets punished for this "ORIGINAL SIN " ? Well that's really rather confusing isnt it, firstly the snake (supposedly the devil) gets punished by having to crawl on its belly for the rest of its days. EXCEPT that the devil is later frequently discribed as "walking around " (an incredible achievement for a paraplegic) indeed he has no problem whatsoever scaling "unusually high mountains" demonstrating skills that would make a Nepalese sherpa green with envy 🤢🤢🤔 Then adam and eve lose their eternal life, except that if they were already eternal why did god also put a tree of eternal life in the garden and ban them from eating from it ?? 🤔🤔 Then of course we have Adam's decendants being punished for it, which seems highly illogical & imoral to me. 🤔 But to be fair the bible seems a little confused on the matter also 👇👇👇👇 The Lord...visits the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation. (Exodus 34:6-7 = Deuteronomy 5:8-10) ............................vrs.................. The son shall *not* suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. (Ezekiel 18:20, cf. Jeremiah 31:30) You know to me that whole original sin biblical narative ( forbidden fruit ect ) seems analogous to me putting a loaded shotgun in a toddlers cot telling them not to touch it, and then being surprised when I hear a *BANG* 💥 and I'm not even omniscient 🤣😅🤣😅 But does this vicarious redemption ( scapegoating) solve the problem and lead to a just and moral solution ?? Well imagine a girl gets raped, they catch the rapist and he gets found guilty in court. The judge sentences him to life, but then says to him "dont worry I will serve your sentence for you" Has the rapist recieved JUSTICE ??? Has the raped girl received JUSTICE ??? Of course not yet that is precisely what happens under the Christian vicarious redemption (scapegoating) Nonsense ideology 🤬🤬 Infact it's an actual Tennant of christianity that even a child murder can be forgiven and go to heaven, if they but repent and believe. 🤮🤮 Your god CANNOT be both perfectly just and perfectly merciful. Mercy is by definition a suspension of justice. I'm going to stop here ( I have work ) and have not even finished addressing your first paragraph yet. You know, you might struggle with this logic thing , but I gotta say your one hell of a linguist. It's a long time since I encountered anyone as fluent in so many dialects of gibberish as you are bud .🤣😅😂🤣😅

@@dogelife7901 lol @ _"iron man"_ 🤣😅🤣 So your whole explanation boils down too _"God is "magic" so he can do anything"_ and you wonder why we laugh at you loons 😂😂😂 Define a "KIND" for me so that it has the ability to identify and differentiate between animals. Demonstrate that your "alpha" is the source of life, I'm waiting with baited breath. 😴😴😴😴🤭

@@dogelife7901 _"there us a preponderance of evidence for ribvolution, just pick up a bible"_ 🤪🤣😅🤣😅😁 The bible is the claim soft lad NOT the evidence. You have no " evidence" so instead you just ASSERT that an invisible man in the sky did it " "MAGIC". You seem he think that if you can somehow discredit science that magic becomes real. Nope sorry soft lad but your inability to comprehend science does not mean we all have to resort to fairytale explanations 😜

@RetroMan Wow. I really feel sorry for you if that is the extent of your education. Are you ignorant about all science or just the science that threatens your faith?

@@170221dn nice ad hominem attack instead of actually addressing his / her points

@@JoeMama-sd2kl "nice ad hominem attack instead of actually addressing his / her points" Oh alright. "The fossil record is full of gaps and its not just that the intermediary fossils are missing but the intermediary intermediary are also missing." If you look at a line from one point to the other and find a mid point , you now have two lines you can find mid points for and so on. We are lucky we have any fossils at all, finding more just creates more "gaps" "mid points" or intermediaries. Not understanding that is just ignorance of the field of science. "What we have is evidence of cats becoming other cats and dogs becoming other dogs but not 1 kind of animal becoming a different kind. " Using the word "kind" just stinks of scientific ignorance, I suspect he wants to use the word species. One species turning in to a current species would require supernatural intervention from say a god but we don't see that. What we see is speciation which we have evidence for and does not require supernatural intervention. "This is where scientists get shifty and they've been called out on this numerous times when they conflate micro evolution/adaptation and try to make it into macro evolution. " Now look who is making assertions without backing them up aka an ad hominem attack. " This and the fact that what the actual record shows is that there isnt actually much difference between animals that existed then and now, that's the nail in the coffin with evolution." Well, this really is just ignorance. We have species now that are like archeopteryx? " A lot of evolution now is guess work and faith based imagination. " That is just an "ad hominem attack" instead of actually producing evidence.

How so?