Help to support us by joining the New Culture Forum's membership scheme. Please see: www.patreon.com/NewCultureForum From only £3 per month you'll receive a range of perks and benefits, including exclusive content.

Not a single person in this country should be voting for anyone involved in the WEF

Vote Reform UK party.

Vote Reform

If Starmer doesn't quit the WEF agenda, he could face the kind of outrage not seen since the French Revolution.

people MUST vote REFORM.

I have never dreaded anything as much as I am the ingress of the Labour party with this vacuous man at the helm! I might just ditch the atheism and start praying....at this point I'll try anything.

Why is no one questioning Starmer in open forums about his involvement with WEF & Tony Blair...

Far left LABOUR God help us.

We really need some divine intervention to keep Starmer from getting into No 10 at all costs.

Who in their right mind would vote for Labour? yet apparently it is a fore gone conclusion

Unfortunately things in this country need to hit rank bottom before things will get better and for all the betrayal of the Tories, we still have a ways to go before enough people are willing to turn their backs on the old, corrupt system in favour of something new.

Starmer will create massive civil unrest.

Starmer is part of Trilateral group.

Starmer will continue with Blair's WEF agenda. Frightening stuff.

FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE ... now , where have I heard that phrase before ?

Superb to hear a group of well read open minded young men.

This man is spot on about stress being a normal phenomenon!

Vote Reform 🇬🇧 🗳 🚀

From his wiki 'Starmer was editor of Socialist Alternatives, a Trotskyist radical magazine. The magazine was produced by an organisation under the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT)'

When Climate became an Emergency, the quality of the weather station network recording the data decreased. That's a sign that Scientists are not at work. Yes, the gods aren't Everywhere, at all.

Purity living is only meant for the Masses,not for the Elite's.

Its easy to announce consent when dissenting positions are removed

Clearly another reason not to vote labour!

Brilliant discussion, spot on. Thank you guys.

Excellent discussion, wide ranging and free- flowing.

One of the most insightful discussions around.

If voting made a difference you wouldn’t be able to do it. Does anyone even complete any of the tasks given in manifesto form. Why have things gotten worse? WEF no matter which side you vote for 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Good evening everyone

corruption of science and the process is the problem, not science itself

I can tell you from my own experience with the NHS , they seem to follow "if there is not a blood test for it, it does not exist". They are very reluctant to give a diagnosis if its not immediately obvious. It might just be a sign of how run down it is. But yes GPs are not given free reign. They follow NICE guidelines. I know alot of my symptoms come from mercury poisoning, but they refused to do the blood test on the basis that they don't have a treatment plan in such an eventuality. "if we don't have a treatment for it, it doesn't exist". This is also demonstrating the tick box nature of the modern NHS and doctoring. There is a lot of wisdom that is totally missed: Dr Bernard Jensen, Dr max Gerson, Dr bircher-benner. Old school wisdom lost. Also lost is the idea of lifestyle change. The NHS is not prepared for this, too much time required and money. Real health comes from lifestyle, food, nutrition etc. all hard work and takes time and dedication. The NHS operates on tick box diagnosis and issuing drugs. Totally stupid.

MSc in environmental science + years in the Amazon + raised on a farm. Wish I’d been a part of this conversation. People who spend their entire lives in cities can’t help having a stunted perspective. COP30 is being held down river from my house. Keen to connect with anyone going.

NZ's own WEF dictator made a "captain's call" and on her own announced the banning of all oil and gas exploration in our country.

May God help us...

What is needed is to set up a people's parliament. Separate from the corruption of Westminster.

And thats why everyone should vote reform, the 2 party government is over, we the people have had enough of broken promises from lab and cons both with the wef

Успокоение в Господе это то к чему придем, к сожалению весь пар амбиций уходит в военное противостояние чаще чем хотелось бы, сейчас это особенно глупое действо для всех, кроме тех уже потерял легитимность и внутреннюю и историческую и они отвлекают внимание на выдуманные военные угрозы

I am glad you referenced carbon sequestration. This is part of the new financial model.

Bring it on...we need to pass this floater.

Finding the language a bit to academic for me this week. I have a degree but can't keep up with some of the concepts this week.

I won't answer to the Unelected

Amazonification...great concept!

Ebery single time i see the "Climate Change" warning below a video it has the opposite effect to the desired effect it is intended to have 😂😂😂

"I can't prove it to you, but it's sciatica" One thing that AI does, is it brings some of this intuition back. We need to make sure that there's room for human intuition a well, though.

Now it will for sure

Take a look at the film of Ken loach getting interviewed talking about kier starmer, scary.

Excellent Conversation.

I’m watching for ‘pinch points’ . The first one was fining boiler makers. The so called ‘clean heat market mechanism’. It’s all very well passing legislation, but if the tech isn’t ready then ..? Same with electric cars. Where reality meets administration

VOTE REFORM

Completely agree with Mr Nicolson. As a British teacher of 30 years I was rated by a group of 14 year old Italian kids ON MY ENGLISH!!! Never been so insulted and would never do summercamps again.

Thank you. A good debate. Wittgenstein did say some sensible things... but his belief that Logic and logic alone was all, was a disaster. He did not understand, much like in The Age of Reason before, that reason cannot exist without at least temporary validity to contradiction. Unless you accept this, it is impossible to understand or use logic. This is another version of the first paradox of reason which states to reason you have to be unreasonable by breaking the law of non-contradiction, the key rule of logic that, by so doing you can understand logic and actually reason. (The first law refers to the impossibility of subjecting all sense and information input to tests of logic. Instead vast quantities that go to memory are as non-logic to avoid thinking and even the brain from seizing up on overload. In this respect we have to be irrational, but dismissing the law of non-contradiction, to be able to think, as well as understand, and use logic He also did the unforgivable in The Investigations which he said mended mistakes he made in The Tractatus. Observing how names are attached to objects as they are learned on your mother's knee he assumed that such a process rendered language relative because such a process was arbitrary passed on from generation to generation. He ignored the shared human physiology of perception, brain processing and structure which provide an absolute foundation to all human languages. That is why we can translate from one language to another. Unforgivable? Wittgenstein rendered humans subject to inhumanity because we are vastly more than what he assumed. His argument makes John Locke and his tabula raza look highly sophisticated. The result? Written out of popular history, perhaps because his philosophy is strangely inaccessible and flawed, Wittgenstein is the father of modern relativism now being used by politicians in a crusade to destroy societies and nations to replace both with state ideological control with all its inherent inhumanity. Deep down, the Woke are products of the absolute positivism of relativism. Question a relativist that they should apply its principles to itself and reason dies. Which is, with boundless irony, the intention of all ideology The Age of Reason, in one way, was a disaster. Failure to understand what reason is, it ushered in closed system philosophers such as Leibniz, Kant, (Descartes and Locke to a lesser extent), Hobbes and the disastrous Rousseau followed by the likes of Malthus and Marx. The inhumanity of Marx stems from denial of reason and, consequently denial of a key aspect of humanity, the use of reason. Things came to the ultimate conclusion with Wittgenstein resulting in the denial, in effect, of access to or reality itself in his Investigations and Relativism. This led to the implosion of respect for philosophy spearheaded by people who thought they were philosophers. Among others were / are ludicrous linguistic philosophers. The inevitable consequence of denial of the importance of contradiction is contempt for disagreement and reason which are at the heart of humanity because there are as many human natures as there are characters. End of frustrated shoutie stuff.

Eradicate evil, eradicate everything bad, create a heaven on earth. A new religion indeed!

Good chat fellas. You’re spot on about personnel/HR. In a previous role I managed a team of 6 that grew to 12 and the deck was stacked clearly and I think intentionally in favour of complainants. I disagree about your guest’s confidence about science and Covid. Take for example both face nappies and the modelling for starters.

one of your guests is clear, concise, insightful and interesting. The other one is none of these. I wish you would not give space and encourage those who have more ambition than ability.

🎯 Key points for quick navigation: 00:05 *📣 Harrison Pitt introduces the show, emphasizing its commitment to challenge ideological conformity among the youth.* 00:18 *🎙️ Guests Connor Tomlinson and Callum Nicholson are introduced, highlighting their roles and perspectives on politicization of science.* 00:32 *🏛️ Nicholson critiques the politicization of science by global and national elites, including bodies like the World Economic Forum and COP26.* 01:15 *🚨 Discussion on the potential impacts of Keir Starmer’s leadership, emphasizing his aggressive stance on climate policies compared to the Tories.* 01:43 *🌍 Analysis of Starmer's proposed climate policies, including advancing UK's net zero target to 2030 and ending new oil and gas licenses.* 02:12 *📉 Concerns are expressed about the ideological drive of the Labour Party overshadowing practical needs of the populace.* 03:07 *⏱️ Skepticism about the feasibility of dramatically advancing climate goals to 2030 from a logistical and realistic standpoint.* 03:47 *🍃 The panel discusses broader cultural preoccupations with purity, both moral and environmental, drawing parallels to religious movements.* 05:08 *🌐 Climate change activism is likened to religious and economic tithing systems, highlighting the moral and economic burdens imposed by ambitious climate policies.* 06:18 *🏖️ A specific legal case in Switzerland is referenced where climate change is argued as a personal infringement on life and privacy.* 07:54 *🧠 Discussion shifts to the cultural shifts around mental health, comparing its current prominence to historical stigmatizations.* 09:04 *💭 The conversation explores the philosophical idea that striving for a frictionless life overlooks the inherent challenges and stresses that define human experience.* 10:41 *🌿 Environmentalism is critiqued for treating nature and resources as mere tools for human use, devoid of intrinsic value.* 13:51 *🌱 The discussion concludes with reflections on the limits of technocratic approaches to environmentalism, advocating for a balance between practical experience and scientific expertise.* 19:49 *🌾 The discussion highlights the importance of practical knowledge and experience in farming, contrasting it with bureaucratic management.* 20:04 *🌿 Jeremy Clarkson's real-world farming experience is praised as more valuable than theoretical expertise.* 20:46 *🇬🇧 Critique of Keir Starmer's preference for globalist approaches over local governance.* 21:00 *💡 Starmer’s energy policies are criticized for relying heavily on taxpayer funding and subsidies for renewables.* 21:26 *🔋 Discusses the unrealistic goals of UK's renewable energy plans, highlighting immense costs and logistical challenges.* 22:23 *🌐 The narrative addresses the impersonal nature of large-scale policies that overlook individual hardships.* 22:50 *🌍 Influence of globalist institutions like the World Economic Forum on national policies is examined.* 23:48 *🪑 Comparison of global policy implementation to IKEA's efficient but impersonal furniture design.* 24:57 *🌎 Critique of international interventions likened to 'political economic Esperanto', highlighting the failure to adapt to local needs.* 28:18 *🌵 Description of the COP climate conference setting in Dubai, juxtaposing its location with oil refineries to highlight ironies in climate discussions.* 29:42 *🌍 Discussion on the impracticality of imposing one-size-fits-all energy policies on diverse global regions.* 30:24 *🔥 Highlighting the urgent energy needs of countries like Malawi, which contrast sharply with Western decarbonization policies.* 32:01 *🏛️ Observations on the elite-driven nature of modern 'revolutionary' movements, particularly in climate policy.* 34:44 *⚖️ Discusses the risk of exploiting science for political ends, introducing the concept of 'scientism' and its potential dangers.* 40:08 *📚 Discussion of philosopher Wittgenstein, emphasizing the distinction between solving scientific problems and addressing real-life issues.* 40:22 *🌍 The critique of how climate change is approached, highlighting the misuse of scientism over science.* 41:02 *🧩 Analysis of societal impacts of climate change, arguing that understanding societal dynamics is as crucial as understanding the science.* 41:30 *🤔 Assertion that life's complexity cannot be simplified into a single scientific or political solution.* 42:12 *⚖️ Critique ofextreme views in the climate debate, suggesting a balanced perspective that respects both scientific findings and social implications.* 43:08 *🦠 Comparison of the handling of COVID-19 and climate change, pointing out the limitations of scientism in addressing complex societal issues.* 44:06 *🗣️ Discussion on the need for open debate and acknowledgment of diverse perspectives in addressing global issues.* 44:47 *🌱 Parallels drawn between the goals of 'Zero COVID' and 'Net Zero' climate targets, illustrating the potential overreach of such goals.* 45:14 *🌐 Highlight on societal hubris in believing in singular, perfect solutions to complex problems, advocating for a more pluralistic and compromising approach.* Made with HARPA AI

Good chat 👍

● “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.... So, in order to save the planet, isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” (Maurice Strong and the roots of the 'Great Reset') ● "Tomorrow, C40 cities chair London Mayor Sadiq Khan will address the UN Climate Summit. The ambition of C40 is to "usher in a new era, one devoid of fossil fuels". In their report, 'The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5C World', they state their new agenda. It demands that by 2030, people should take just one short-haul flight, of no more than 932 miles every three years and calls for a BAN ON DAIRY AND MEAT by 2030."

I'm mostly left (but do like to hear the views of of the right, too, abd don't always disagree). Even us lefties have no time for starminism. His government will be a disaster for Britain. The Workers Party of Great Britain had the most sensible manifesto, but msm froze them out, even though the leader was an MP. Unlike farage, who got far more attention than he deserves with no seat in parliament. Totally bias. Starminism will be utter technological authoritarianism with the continued profit of the top few.

Don't let Alarmists get away w conflating CC w the Environment. CO2 is a colorless, non-toxic gas. We all want clean H2O & Air

Wow, that was high powered! Loved it. I think I could follow most of it but even if I couldn't, I am sure others could and great way to move forward with our goals.

The over-riding factor is the self-evident UNANTICIPATED CHANGE. Trouble is expected but what we are seeing is unexpected

British people are up for the WEF that is why they voted for Labour.

Amount of compensation that EIBSS has paid out = zero and it's set to continue to be! Been trying to find some benefit of the infected blood inquiry finally being done, but there's no indication of there being any benefit yet! Was kinda hoping there would be some especially now I've got to SVR! Turns out Benedikt Strunz was probably right & there's very little benefit from SVR.

whats the Dabune institute?

I enjoyed this conversation even if a fair bit went over my head!

Wow, what a podcast

True "what is" is significant to actual people. What matters most is not the why it is but simply what is.

Is this no longer available on apple podcast?

They can change laws and living anyway they do ,but they can't change the effect in reality when the main change is out of their control via the solar events taking place. Making everyday stress a mental health problems is bizarre it's just a veil to keep you in limbo and control.lol😊

Tacit or contextual knowledge Michael Polanyi, 1960

I would have found it very interesting if you challenged the climate debate with respect to the temporal argument used by the activists. It seemed that was flatly denied at the start of the video and justified as a cultural issue later on, whereas I feel the activists state that we must act now, "based on the science." This was a really good discussion and it would be greatly improved with some challenge, rather than just smiling and nodding. As a viewer I really want to know how I can challenge an activist who knocks on my door rather than just a regurgitation of unsubstansive denials.

Renewables aren't cost effective if they are subsidized at all

There is more to life than breathing. The constant vehicular traffic on ever more roads and housing estates roars all 24 hours. Children can no longer walk to school by themselves, play outside with their friends in the countryside (which scarcely exits in many cities; and yes, it should.)

The advert at the beginning of this video should not be used. Very dangerous item.

When i was a young man a piece of wood, or steel was the only thing i heard got stressed. Its a modern concept and terminology.

Renee Guenon Reign of Quantity.

Wish they would talk plainly and not try to outdo each other with their cleverness

If labour gets in, it's going to be a real shit show.

If all people farmed right in the 1st place and used natural fertiliser methods organic brake-down / vegetation critters earthworms ect shite food wouldn’t exist. Leaf fall dead fall the rain forest feeds itself. And you certainly don’t need a degree to observe this. One thing people have in common and that is a complete lack of time due to hours spent at work drastically reduces time for research and basic observation. And one thing is for sure one man can not know it all no matter how hard you try. Experience matters. An imagination is not hands on read as meny books as you like experience outweighs it. Batteries are not needed I ve been looking at off grid techniques you can dump excess energy you don’t use via a heating element. solar panels apparently only last 20 years unless you can get said parts that have failed due things being manufactured to brake. Hydro I believe is the way to go Nuclear power is far from clean no matter what they try and say about it. Why are they not building big filtration systems to help pull the impurities out of the air??? Also do all these steel tall buildings mess with the earth magnetic field ? Yep scientific papers do have tendency to change there mind. I’m just wondering what was in those boxes that disappeared of Nicola Tesla research

Pray for England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🙏🏼🇺🇸

You Bruised Thomas not UK general election in England. You vote Labour party Thomas with Pietro' Boselli Italian Punch and Judy British politics that Italian invented that as puppets politically in British politics England London Britain yes. Italy said no UN migration pact. You hit 🎯 Thomas with Rishi Sunak Conservative. Why did Tories pick him as Conservative Leader. He has disrespect D Day 1944 British soldiers. Italy attend D Day Normandy no Thomas. Italy better system Thomas.

Your UpThumb is missing. I wonder is this a KZfaq thing to reduce upvotes?

make it illegal for our politicians, local and national, to be members of wef. Just dreaming.

This analysis may be correct or may not be. Only thing we can say that -- The view, the understanding, the analysis varies from person to person - depending on each individuals knowledge, education and intelligence.

Connor really is a snide little swot isn't he 😂 "Look at me! I'm so clever!!" Thank goodness for your much better guest, Nicholson. Connor demonstrates Nicholson's point beautifully. He thinks he knows a lot because he's read stuff and can waffle strings of intelligent sounding sentences, packed with polysyllabic words for England, yet doesn't actually say very much at all. Whereas Calum Nicholson has lived and gained experience. Connor is constantly trying very hard, gabbling to impress. Nicholson speaks slowly in simple language and manages to say so much more. An absolute pleasure to listen to.

What say in polling card Thomas. Thomas Barnardi Boyd they give you Italian citizenship Italy Republic 🇮🇹 it Pietro Boselli Italian he your friend Thomas and Art Bezrukaveko.

Never forget Starmer's answer when asked 'Westminster or Davos?' He chose Davos, and then tried to justify it. Anyone who votes Labour must own the consequences. It's going to be a nightmare.

STARMER AND LABOUR LOVING W.E.F. STARMER WONT BE IN POWER LONG ENOUGH****

No more Evan Riggs?

Is sir kier a member of the trilateral commision?

Martin sellner Austrian he my friend yes Thomas.

Your guest speaking ?

Fighting idealogical conformity? It's a KZfaq channel - you're not fighting anything. Making videos and commenting is not fighting anything. And they know it!

Starmer will continue with Blair's constitutional change/WEF agenda. Frightening stuff.

The NHS is delighted to throw away data when it comes to the upper middle class. Homeopathy is shaken water and Acupuncture is piercing Chakras. A Chakra line has never been dissected in a cadaver, not do chakras appear in Greys Anatomy. Yet you can get both Homeopathy and Acupuncture on the NHS.

It's not a difficult question to answer if you include evolutionary biology, and evolutionary psychology into your discussions.

Lysenkoism

I disagree the science behind covid was good. It was terrible. Yet I do believe climate science is quite good.

Has Evan left permanently now?

God told us what would happen before Jesus returned in the Book of Revelation and in the Gospels. In the Bible God tells us the future he plans over and over again. Despite God's efforts man rejects God and the truth and destroys himself and brings judgment upon himself. Jesus returns after the rapture and the 7 year judgement.