Has Firebat put his side of those matches up anywhere ?

Lol suck it james

@@bilateralrope8643 He put up games with the same deck but I doubt those matches will make it to youtube, from the other perspective it's not "good content" since he'd just be getting run over by tokens and buffs with no way to respond.

I do remember classic rogue.

Blizzard: "hey remember when you had 2/3 on turn 2? What if we made that 8/7?"

Remember Turn 4 Yeti 4/5? How about turn 5 Dragon 8/8, 10 Manacrystal each?

@@HandsomeGamerGuy Noz the timeless is 4 mana

Yeah, imagine if this was in Rogue...

That's the type of deck that can make me uninstall the game and never touch it again... I survived Gadgetzan Pirate Warrior and Standard Odd Pally, but this one is just insane... it frightens me

with lotus bloom turn 3 lethal is possible even without perfect draws, and in wild with lotus bloom shaman can get turn 2 lethal with perfect draws on the coin, that is a first for hearthstone

Turn 4 lethal is usually possibly with God draw aggro vs bad draw anything.

Max Wilner He also gave Gidra a poor rating despite how outrageous she is.

I like regiskillbin, but there are a ton of cards he says are poor, but then he is proven wrong.

For all we know, Gibberling might indeed be a one star card - it’s way too early to say otherwise. They are playing in a false meta and experimenting with decks. A snowball card like Gibberling is always going to look better in those circumstances. We’ll have to wait until the xpac drops tomorrow to know anything for sure. See how it fares in the meta etc.

@@jackrodway4159 Any card that can potentially snowball a board into a turn 4 lethal will see play. Its a strong proactive card. Those see play.

And it's very easy to snowball Gibberling. Compare to Feral Gibberer, where the only way to get it to snowball was very difficult (you had to keep it in play and keep it attacking face, and you then had to pay extra mana to get those on board). Here, it's relatively easy to develop a board (especially for Druid, which has access to a number of cheap buff spells) through this card. I'd barely even call it a snowball card, it's a legitimate synergy threat.

Nah, he’s facing untuned decks. There’s always one stand out deck pre-launch that falls flat - like singleton demon hunter looked godly pre-launch but was quickly overshadowed by better builds. Really fast, aggressive decks like this one will be countered.

Nah it's not gonna happen

@@Vidrageon I don't know man, gibberling looks nuts. I can see versions of this deck running some instant mana ramp cards (innervate, the overload innervate) and making huge boards on turns 1 and 2 that you can't do anything about. And any deck with that kind of highroll potential should see good play.

Nicolas Ott If druid had the hunter hero power this deck would be insane. However, since tempo was the meta in the previous expansion, I don’t really see this deck doing well because it burns out too quickly.

Infinite gibberlings lost, truly tragic.

I also thought that it would have been awesome to see firebat's rrsponse to the madness

firebat and pathra, should have seen their POV

i think it call token druid, it been thing forever man

thats already aggro rogue and soul fragment dh

@@Yahikkox Those too. I'll be trying weapon Rouge first. Seems fun.

The mono-far sight deck was an...interesting choice. 🤔

Shaman is so trash right now if you don't build it hyper aggro, they nuked it's galakrond package to oblivion and it's only received bad cards since.

Helois Gevit they seriously need to either buff some cards or undo some nerfs because it’s practically unplayable on ladder

@@chadcooley7994 Indeed, I can't believe they nerfed all 3 Shaman Galakrond cards, the only decent midrange option the class had, just because it was tier 1 for 2 weeks upon release.

Kripp would contest the title.

Because it can be countered easily if it were to became meta

@@instrumentaltiger5633 yeah I think your right But that was a nice show

I am thinking about trying to get rank legend with this deck i mean it is possible

@@felixsteiner296 yeah, it not a bad deck, its good, but if it were popular it can be countered so as long as it is not really popular its possible to hit legend no problem

@@felixsteiner296 if you don't encounter to many Mages and shamans you should do that easy going

You should probably stop playing hearthstone then. I hate them too, but they'll always be viable in this kind of format - even in Wild (which is much more varied and fun IMO) playing Warlock and just spamming out a load of low tier garbage is actually competitive. Hell, I've built a deck that's 95% anti-aggro (LITERALLY 95%) and STILL not had enough clearance. I'm enjoying battlegrounds a lot for that exact reason.

like everytime a expansion drop, aggro/tempo deck own other archetype since everyone testing new thing

spell your name right. "Brian"