In my opinion, people from that time and culture still connect the natural disaster with greater powers. They often do not separate them. So when a kinda weird person (like Senua) comes along and says it was the giant's doing, it 'makes sense' to them, even though they never see it.

@@slantedglasses7242 that still does not explain how they actuallly saw the giants and fought the sea giant alongside senua

If 50 bucks is too much for this type of game, that is already very niche, we're doomed. That's why corporations are only financing slop that goes for 100 hours of average content. Because we as buyers are sending them that message, that we simply want to buy entertainment per hour. I think we should be sending a different message. That we want thoughtful and artful games, that have a message to convey and give us food for thought. And by definition those can't simply be games that take a lot of hours. Or better said, it's very rare that they can do that. Generally, only smaller teams with a focused vision want to risk that sort of thing. And those don't have the budgets for sprawling size and risky thoughtful narratives. I'm of a different vision. I want games not priced based on length or size of content. I want them priced based on how masterful and thoughtful they are. And how emotionally resonant they manage to be. How much they touch the person playing it. And not in a superficial, fast-food endless content to consume matter of way. There's plenty of AAA games, with dozens upon dozens of fat, that are 60-70 dollars, that I would probably not even support for half that. And then there's very few, very special games, like SOMA, that I would honestly have no issue paying 100 dollars. But if we can't at least support them for 50 I don't know what to say. Just that we're probably not gonna get many of these. It's already very hard to create something like this, but then to also have the difficulty in getting it rewarded.

@@danutz_plusplus from this point of view I 100% agree with you and btw,I paid the 50 bucks to support it bc for me personally it was worth it. But the average gamer wants to play a game and doesn't pay a developer for his vision - if I go out for dinner,I pay for a product and not for the cook's vision of a meal...

I was half way though and wondering where the breakdown was going to happen.. then I saw your comment. Not knocking his narration but I wanted an explanation. Thanks for letting me know, off to find another video

I mean... It is a puzzle game 😅

You should probably stick to Fortnite

@@valravn246 That would still be a better game than a walking simulator. Just stick to this and Alan Walks 2

@@Azureskies01 You most likely didn’t play either one. Looking up videos about games you apparently don’t like just to post negative comments is crazy, but you do you bot 💀

@@valravn246 naw i post positive things too, just not about shitty games