Aaron "noodle" Greenberg, made the console right?

Aaron Greenberg is basically a Xbox fanboy hype beast but that actually works for them lol

Yes both those things are true 60 is the standard but some games can also go to 120.. and some games wont do either...like standard move length is around 1 and half hours but sometimes a movie is far longer... standard is just what things end up being most of the time

Name the AAA next gen only xbox exclusive that dropped at 60fps day 1 for a standard so far.​@De1usionsofGrandeur

It eats monsters for breakfast

The PS5 is actually a much faster machine in every way over the seriesX, but because everyone buys into MS marketing they think the SeriesX is a "stronger" machine. Well, I don't think the SeriesX could run Spiderman 2 speed swinging tech. Also when the PS5 pro is released with it's 33 teraflops.... wait and see how the games run before buying into all that marketing nonsense.

​@@TranscendingPolygonsPlayStation let the games show off the technical capabilities, Xbox let Phil show off his lying capabilities.

shut up you sony pony scrublord

Hey, I know that guy lol

have u ever getting any games on your console?

Only issue I had with Sonys games was the that those seem to be the only type of games they make would like to see them do other things

​@@De1usionsofGrandeurBut that wasn't true either. What were those first party PlayStation games that seemed "movie games"? It all started with The Last of Us, that was the game xbots said was a walking movie sim. The rest of the first party games was pretty much light or heavy action-adventure games. The xbots even trashed on Hellblade 1, walking sim, cinematic, slow dull combat, puzzle game, short boring game and so on. After Ninja Theory was acquired oh Hellblade was suddenly amazing! Liars and hypocrites.

​@@De1usionsofGrandeurBots also said "Hellblade may look great and realistic, but it still trash"

Its the best looking ue5 game ever so yeah, we are excited.. Arent you? Lol

@@dusermiginte4647 OP is not saying people shouldnt be excited. They are saying there are a lot of hypocrites out there that changed their sentiments just because a game of this style is exclusive to their preferred console. Pretty much proves the hate for the third person cinematic action games was forced and a desperate attempt at coping.

Shit fr, just look at Horizon Forbidden Wests Burning Shores DLC, that looks better than the base game, yet the resolution and framerate hasn’t changed. Won’t be surprised if DS2 has a performance mode tbh

Facts

I don't think DS2 is gonna be 60 fps on the base ps5

Why lmao thays their engine if devs don't want to optimize their own engine that's their problem

😂😂😂

Oh wow I'll never beable to unsee it lmao

It's not that simple smh.

Tell us you know nothing about technology without telling us.

Don't think they would want sony to sell to Microsoft just yet

@@De1usionsofGrandeurlearn english

I expect nothing framerate wise anymore. Ps5 pro likely won't run GTA 6 at 60 so I have no hope anymore. Maybe ps6

@@AidenR23 since I been both speaking and writing it my whole life I think I am good...

Well the game is completely seamless, so idk how many masked loading screens it would have

Imagine how we feel watching these dudes since 08/09

fr, I was in middle school watching BG. Now Im a few years into a whole ass career

People don't realize that. The higher the fidelity the harder it will be to reach high framerate. It will never change.

Give people option to choose . that's the massage

Literally only fighting one character at a time lol.

​that's what the next generation consoles are for. Sony has no problem with 60fps and still having beautiful games.

Get a PS5 if you want 60fps or higher with Vrr, and you can look at all the incredible PS5 first party games which all run 60fps or higher with Vrr while also looking phenomenal and some games like rift apart, and SpiderMan 2 also use Ray tracing and still run 60fps minimum. The Microsoft devs are lazy and don’t care to optimize anymore as that’s the problem not the hardware, and it’s not only Microsoft first party devs but many third party devs are doing the same stuff not optimizing anymore

​@@HaloinfiniteEternal Some of it is optimization, and sometimes games are just too demanding. For example, I think if GTA 6 is 30, it's probably because the game is very graphically impressive and the world is advanced. Not that they didn't optimize. And if you want 60, you might need decent PC or a PS5 Pro

Yeah, these companies are wack

Oh snap 😯

I am not lol

BG making that bread. Promotion!

⁠@@BrokenGamezHDRI’d avoid it

I was thinking the same thing 😂

It's like they aint even trying nomore

It's almost like it was a choice and they spent all these years aiming for 30fps based on the direction of story and gameplay. I know it's crazy to use our big boy brains. But trust and believe, you can do it my friends!

@@Mmachine88 iT's A ChOicE yet it's 60fps on PC cope harder 🤡

​@@Mmachine88 I'm saying. Knowing the game is super cinematic and that they are pushing the visuals in UE5, they probably were building the game to be 30 FPS. Because if they cared enough to make it 60, they'd probably lower the graphical detail by a lot or use a different engine from the jump.

With that logic…Why don’t they just lock it at 30fps on PC also…

Poonies dont know how ue5 works.. Prepare to be blown away playing the game on youtube in may.. Where is my cotton??!

@@dusermiginte4647 Damn i can sense your tears lmao

That's a weird statement. Who is the person in authority who said it's not okay to be 30 like who had the authority to make that statement for the gaming community as a whole? I would like all games to be 60, but unlike most of you I actually understand why most of these games aren't 60. And hyper simplistic terms. It's like you have a 10 gallon bucket and you have 10 different liquids of different weights like the water / corn syrup, science experiments. It is up to the deck to determine how much of each material is poured in the container, but only one of these materials represents the frame rate and obviously the container isn't going to get bigger so you have to pick and choose what is most important in your game. At a certain point the developer has to ask themselves. Do I want this game to run at 60 or do I want this game to look hyper realistic? Do I want my game to use mechanics that put a load on the system or do I want it to run at 60? How many objects do I want on the screen? What's draw distance do I want or do I want 60? People tend to not understand the fact that every game that runs at 60 could probably look four times better and do some wild mechanics, but the developer chose 60 frames per second over everything else.

Just like how they believe the "power" of the cloud fairytale shenanigans fantasising that cloud gaming is the "future" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 only tech illiterates believe that nonesense

Ya cause their main goal for the game was the visuals not the frames.

If you want all that (on a console), yeah it'll probably be 30 FPS. So I don't doubt GTA 6 or Marvel Rise of Hydra could be 30 fps

Xbox wasn't ready

too late….fanboys never held the line

It's not about standards and this isn't even a PlayStation fan or an Xbox fan issue. This is about people in the game and community in general who are not devs not understanding how games function and then making demands. The fact of the matter is all games can hit 60 frames. The issue has nothing to do with frames it has everything to do with everything else. The thing that you people don't seem to understand is these deaths want their games to be able to do certain things and they pick and choose what they want to prioritize the resources towards. If they really wanted this game to hit 60, they could drop the graphical fidelity reduce the draw distance. Simply put they could make the game look a whole lot worse and make it run a whole lot better but they don't want to do that. The fact of the matter is a game like God of War or horizon or Spider-Man could look three to four times better than it does now, but those games would probably run worse frame rate wise. Casein point final fantasy 16. If you listen to digital foundries analysis of that game you will learn that when combat starts in that game, the resolution of everything else in the background drops this is the only reason final fantasy 16 can keep its frame rate during combat. This goes to my point when I say that to do these things you have to lose something and the way they did it in final fantasy. They temporarily made you lose resolution and fidelity of the background so you wouldn't lose frame rate in the foreground but the fact of the matter is that game does not run perfectly at 60 FPS all the time they had to do those tricks to create the illusion that it does because even they knew it couldn't run that way and also look how it is. But you guys ignore all of this because it's a good talking point to s*** on your rival. And the only thing you do when you demand for every game to be 60. Is it you're basically limiting what devs can do when they make games? Because they're going to have to not implement certain mechanics that use a lot of resources or not make the game look as good as it could visually just to keep that 60 frame rate.

​​@@Grimjr7 that reply is way too long. Just chalk it up to them using UE5 and move along. The world knows how demanding that engine has been on damn near every title these past 4 years. They could've reach a good 1440p 60, easily on their old engine, if what they've shown in their trailer is all we'll get; its up to them to prove me wrong. You can keep your artistic integrity when your purpose in creating the product is to entertain friends and family. But leave that shit at the door when you want paying customers. We asked for 60fps minimal, this generation. You figure out how you're going to get there. That's before we mention that it'll achieve presumed stable 30fps with dynamic resolution. No native 4k resolution. Some people are good with 4k30. Hellblade 2 is having none of that.

Let the brand die and wither. The clowns that seem hellbent on maintaining mediocrity and trash will never learn their lesson until Xbox goes offline... FOR GOOD!

That ship has sailed half a decade ago. They are done as a console manufacturer...Watch them fail as a publisher

CasualStation 5 is the blu ray player for you. Enjoy

@@EpsiIonEagle emotional

They sold us "the worlds most powerful console" but no EXCLUSIVES show that smh. The Series X is my last Xbox. Foh

Like Scamstation5 🤣

⁠@@EpsiIonEagle Lol i can sense the tears from here

Has nothing to do with the S. There is no FPS or resolution parity clause. That's like saying a 4080 won't be able to get 60 FPS because a 1060 and Steam Deck are the minimum requirement. If anything that would make the game more optimized...

7 hour 30 fps walking sim is apparently going to be GOTY now lmao

I don’t. I’ve never played Hellblade 1 and I don’t want a MovieStation 5. Fake Xbox fans everywhere

​@@EpsiIonEagleHelldivers 2 and Stellar Blade looks more fun than anything on xbox atm.

@@EpsiIonEagleYou’re a fan of Xbox’s lack of identity ?🤔

​@@Slodi_TLGHelldivers 2 is on P.C and it's carrying it not PS 🤷

Full tower ? Micro atx or itx?

@@TKaz10 I got a Skytech Nebula, so tower.

Welcome

@@EnigmaticJay I had PCs in the past, but not a gaming one until now.

Same

series S that why

All of a sudden nobody likes 30fps? All your ps4 games were 30fps

Most people do not care about the frames, as long as it looks good the majority will be fine. Although this is a not good consistent trend with Xbox first party games.

@@stewarde17it’s a single player game theres no reason the S can hold the X away from a performance mode . They could just leave the S at 30 and give the X the option. I think it’s just the devs being stupid

​@@stewarde17 No it isnt, your just talking. Games are allowed to have a different frame rate between the X and S. The parity clause is for things like game modes, not FPS

thats fine as long as its a good 8 hours im fine with it. not a full price game either and its on gammepass

That’s fine I’m tired of these long ass games

In easy mode is 4 hours.

​@@ArielCleirigh That's would be on you then. Why would you play on easy lmao

I think it's okay. It isn't $70 and I wouldn't wanna play a super narrative and cinematic game like this for 40 hours. Or even 25

It's not the Series S 💀

@@cynthiaandoh9575 Acting like you know that

@@Owen01 I kinda do. What he said doesn't make sense. What would the S have to do with the FPS a completely different SKU gets? There's no FPS parity I expect the same thing for 1943: Rise of Hydra. That Captain America and Black Panther game. The game looks insane, so I heavily doubt it will be 60 FPS on console. Will you blame the Series S then? You have to be able to think critically beyond just "game doesn't have my preferred performance or they made a creative decision and it's only on Xbox, it must be due to the Series S" There's a reason you never hear somebody on PC with a 4090 blame a Steam Deck user or 1060 owner for why a game runs bad. If anything, the game being on Steam deck means the optimized it really well for low spec hardware, and that it'll be optimized and run better overall

I think a plague tale requiem, they patched it a year later tho

Bro if you use your eyes and ears, the entire experience from top to bottom is literally aiming an actual cinematic experience. Let's not pretend that we can't have big boy complex thoughts

@Mmachine88 I have "BIG" eyes to see that it's in 30fs in the trailers. Still doesn't cut it for me. Don't stop me from you in not playing this game.

​@@Mmachine88 gotta stop that copium talk kiddo

@blackvalio4060 please inform me how I'm coping by stating facts bud. Please help a kid out

@@Mmachine88 literally nothing you said is a fact. If it was ,, cinematic,, then pc was gonna be 30 as well. They simply are incapable of optimising their dogshit game. I will repeat child, stop with your xbot copium lies

would not matter they still need develop for both only way it work is if they released for X first then completely rework and release 6 to 9 months later on S like they do for switch.

Shit they already did with BG3

@@Owen01 yes but that was a feature he talking about basically the backbone of the game

No sir