France: Am I a joke to you?

@Kian macatuno damn, the comeback🔥

Napoleon invading Russia: Ima rek uuuuuuu..... ohhhhhhhhh uhhhhhhh Germany invading Russia ww1: GET REKT BOI YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA IM BETTER THEN NAPOLEAn fine white peace. Woah woah what NO STOP HOW WHAT YOU DONT HAVE RUSSIA HOW ARE YOU SO G...... Germany invading Russia take 2: REKKKKKKKKTTTTTTTTTTTT OH UHHHHH 3 front war? Thanks Nato invading Russia: Ohhhhh uhhhhhhhh somebody call Germany this is normal for him

@@Walmart_Discount Germany in WW1 technically successfully took out Russia

@@Walmart_Discount russia lost to the german empire in 1917.

NATO discord call: UK: WW3 started we are at war! User Scotland has left your channel

17th of April, 2025. Independence Day!

Switerland:excuse but what going on guys NATO & BRICS: WW3

@@top8753 Haha yeah Meanwhile Finland and Sweden sit up there like paranoid hermits just screaming across the border the moment anything gets close. XD

@@Walmart_Discount Lol, its worse for switzerland

Both Berlin and Paris will be taken again)

Well, only Mongols, French and Polish ever occupied Moscow

@@bruh-mm3ux But in the end they lost and occupied them, and the Russians generally divided Poland two times (

@@bruh-mm3ux and by the way, during the war with France, Moscow was not the capital of Russia

@@BATMAN-vz9xf they divided Poland, only with German help

His* Germany calls their lands the Fatherland

@@soppa24 In my native language Germany is feminine.Do countries even have genders in English?

@@gregorykafanelis5093 Germany os well known as the fatherland while Russia is the Motherland and whats in between the both Poland

@@soppa24 Countries as well as things such as boats, airplanes etc. are generally referred to as female in English though.

@@KaiserStormTracking the abused child

Indeed, almost 700k men and 15k tanks lost. That couldn't have went much worse for BRICS.

GameWatcher yea

@@GameWatcher545 what music did you used in this video?

@@reapervalentin9167 Hell March - Red Alert OST

I love poland

Nah, at this point it would probably end with just fixing climate change.

@@martenkahr3365Lmao i disagree @Marten, china if they had full opportunity would happily try to blow NATO to shit no matter if the earth is in a better shape, #NATO ALL THE WAY!!!

@@martenkahr3365 Yeah, China would immediately fire off nuclear weapons if the war hit their home turf.

I meant that the nuclear "winter" from all the nukes would just about balance out with climate change to something that's just about alright to live in (if not for all the radiation).

@@martenkahr3365 Uhhh... I sincerely doubt that. Just all of the fallout and particles in the air making radioactive clouds and rain would destroy ecosystems worldwide, the very same clouds would block out almost all sunlight (the cause of the nuclear winter), PLUS the collapse of society isn't really a landscape that is "just about alright"

Switzerland: Oh,hello.

Sweden and Finland: Welcome!

Mexico: No thanks, i have tacos

Indonesia: Eating rice

Philippines: can i join you, guys?

i mean irl their relations are pretty good and in a war between usa and china vietnam sides with usa

I’m pretty sure Vietnam stays neutral in a war between the US and China. They’d obviously prefer an American victory but they have nothing to gain and everything to lose from getting involved. That’s pretty much the same for all of the ASEAN countries. Japan, Australia, and the UK are the most likely to get involved, followed by other NATO members, and less likely India or South Korea. Unless North Korea tried striking at an opportunity which is pretty 50/50, I can’t see most of NATO or SK getting involved.

@@ScuffTuff i meant on like a ww3 scenario on where everyone is involved, you dont need to write a paragraph

@HumorGames My bad, I wasn’t trying to come at you. I just kinda wanted to share haha

@@ScuffTuff it’s ok man I Wright stuff like this all the time.

it is but it wouldn't be like that in real life, brazil has the best survival course in the jungle, and a considerable military force, if there were really so many countries attacking at the same time, we might not last long in common ground but it wouldn't be easy invading rio de janeiro or são paulo, there are communities that even have war tanks in brazil XD, and in the jungle they would have a lot of work to defeat our army.

In nato only America In brics evry country are superpower

NATO fulfilled Brazil wish

But of course, Brazil is in isolated to the other BRICS, except South África, that it isn't a real military power

Brazil might keep the Amazon, but much of their coasts could be taken with some effort. (though some is an understatement, Brazil would be very difficult to conquer)

The only thing Vietnam hate more than capitalist western imperialism is China

@@LiterallyWho1917 kinda ironic that they have a lot of western companies too tbh. But atleast, it's better to adapt that way than being a stubborn like North Korea. Edit: Isn't Vietnam and China hate each other already hundred years ago before socialism was a thing there?

@@sweetballs4742 Yes. China at one point in the past conquer them and they have no forgotten that event. So this was very on brand they hate China and powerful one specially with India gone as China rival they would throw themselves to anybody that oppose them. Purely to survive as state. Wither this India-China alliance be threat to them or not the mere existent of such thing be taken as existential threat.

@@sweetballs4742 yes

@@sweetballs4742 Of the Vietnamese it's said they fought America for ten years, France for a hundred years, and China for a thousand.

Ye I think that why NATO won

Factories won the day

We go to war with I know BRICs I is for India but they should be a ally county on NATOs SIDE. These are Axis powers in the next war in the 2017 to 2030 time period. 1 Russia (We got to get them Cyber attackers , " remember the Main " / the colonial pipeline hack ) 2 Belarus 3 China 4 North Korea 6 Iran 7 Palestinian Territories (Gaza Strip and West Bank) (we got to get the Hamas group taken care off )

at Discord Chaos - there are people in here that dont wish well for America and the world... They Want the Russians and the terrorists to bring down the government...these are John Titors friends. this is the order of apocalyptic events - 1 Pandemic , 2 Civil War II , 3 World War III and then 4 destroyed world by 2036. from wingmaker Jonathan necropolis the stock market oracle of Ohio Holding $TONR , $BKTI , $GOED and $AMC

NATO

Red baroon leader!

That one fool with a crop duster:

Not to mention Pakistan also joining in with India. Just minor details for the AI apparently

@@GameWatcher545 Oh yeah forgot about that rivalry Hahahaha

or vietnam

Stupider shit has happened before.

@@GameWatcher545 well Russia, China, India and Pakistan are all members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

A war hero

Probably one guy with a lot of humility and no fear of anything in live (or as we say in Germany: "I survived the war, so I will probably also survive your mother, Erika...."

@@xornxenophon3652 I don't quite get the German saying

@@peterstroe1216 The guy is comparing his horrible experiences in ww2 with his wive; he vows that he will not only survive ww2 but also his wive...

@@xornxenophon3652 That makes sense. Thanks for sharing!

You're also strategically irrelevant. We'd just blockade you and leave you there.

Preach

You realize that would be way worse for Brazil a million Vietnamese were killed compared to 58,000 Americans times that by 30 not looking to good for Brazil

lol we all know what's gonna happen irl.

What if giant armies bomb whole Vietnam

@@krishnamandal9339 Nah, I don't think that is a good idea. Vietnamese people can do anything to survive. If you bomb them, you still lost the war. There no invader can beat them. For example: The Vietnam war :D

@@ucnghia9003 however, although I'm not saying they could capitulate Vietnam, Brazilian armies could give them a good match since they also have experience of fighting in jungles.

@@zamxn2429 only a small portion of brazil is even jungle. brazil would not stand a chance of any nato invasion. there is no matchup. the deadliest casualties is maybe Rio de Janeiro and the amazon

in this game that's what won them it you need cas air superiority to push

@@SM-ys8lw Probably why I am always having a hard time pushing, I tend to Neglect the Airforce and when I actually work on it I tend to go for Tactical bombers and Heavy fighters, rather then CAS cause Tactical bombs are versatile. (but much worse at close air support then actual CAS)

@@speedy01247 Tactical bombers are trash and Heavy Fighters are too niche, just build cas and normal fighters

Imagine being the pilot of that last BRICS plane before they surrendered. Since it says only 1 air force left at 5:29 They might've been one of the 6-7000 pilots at the start of the war in January 2017, but which had dipped into 3 digits in February 2018 and never rosen into 4 digits again, wandering between two and three digit numbers until 2026 when they surrendered. Imagine being that guy. The one surviving pilot of an 9 year war for a side which might've had ten thousand pilots, aircrews and intact planes throughout the war, and only he survived it intact and never shot down.

Pls understand that this is not reality , it's just a game . Yes in the past nato countries were powerful , but now bricks countries are catching up . the 2nd , 3rd and 4th powerful countries are Russia , china and India . And in future Asia will become the economic and military hub of the world . Bricks would be more powerful. NATO cannot control the huge population of BRICKS .

WW3 may cause casualties that larger than all wars in history combined.

Hello Franco. Well that sounds interesting to me. Will explore further :)

Yeah that’s a little something called real life :P

Kkkk não entedi a referencia Direito

@@leonardos.b3111 eu tbm não kk

@@Marcosbr007 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ot92fLF4uq3ZpHk.html

kkkk eu entendi

@ファビオ tem mais de uma musica tocando, qual voce se refere?

Only odd thing is NATO will never be able to land in vietnam, they will be shot down from all three possible directions that is through South asia sea, indian ocean, and directly through china, Both india and china have Defense shields at these choke points.

Brasil you managed to take the coast when you enter the country, especially amazons, you don't even need a soldier, own animals there would be an end Jungle

ai want to kill al sudanes pipol

They're the best after deciphering the tactics of general winter

Kaise?

Brasil , Índia e Paquistão não entraria na guerra :rcs apenás

@Red Yeah, too bad Putin is now creating a mega escalation that could probably lead to WW3 and that he is alarming his nuclear defense systems, how beautiful life is

@Red oh boy

like in command and conquer generals zero hour option lol, no nuke allowed

I doubt russia has working nukes, they are probably rusted. They keep threating with nukes but for some reason nothing yet..

CcP is stupid, should have been allly with India

@@riyashah7486 India is smart, isn't allying with China

Numbers aren’t everything. Sure, India and China have LARGE militaries, but they’re not as ADVANCED as, say, the US or France.

да, но американская авиация делает БУМ

@@rural8438 that's what people said about Germany vs USSR and here we are

Ok

Gamer

Ridiculo! o Brasil tomaria a america do sul em um mes

@@gustavocobra77 Sim kkkkkk

@@napoleonfamilyfrienlyoamig174 iludidos. . .

The first stroke is 10-15 minutes. If the ICBM location areas are not disabled, the second wave will take 20-25 minutes. Cruise missiles will arrive in an hour. 2 hours of nuclear war, about 2 weeks of torment of the survivors. The onset of nuclear winter. The end of human history.

5:00+ whole Asia unites and eats nato

it's realistic

MD US is actually really weak compared to RL so...

Thank you!

@@GameWatcher545The timelapses have certainly improved

It does makes sense in today’s world

Vietnam hates China and ironically has good relations with the US

Us getting flashback

@anonymous og yes but neither is the CCP They are literally damming rivers that go into your country

It's "Hell March" by Frank Klepacki, from Red Alert 1; remixed versions were included in Red Alert 2 and 3

Normally that happens when faction leader falls, or loses leadership.

@@GameWatcher545 which nato nation is strong and That wierd type of Brown?

@@Sebastian-hc8rj india

@@toddhoward7649 India is in Brics

@@Sebastian-hc8rj my bad wrong faction

Just like the old time

aren't both like too far away

​@@taureon_ Yes and no. In real life, that's the primary reason why the EU unlike the US, isn't too involved in South East Asia. Japan and South Korea are friendly and westernized in terms of the political foundation but the attention is rightly on Russia. The thing is; today, Russia and China cooperate because Russia wasn't integrated in the NATO when the chance was there ( you can read up on that on Wikipedia, it's an interesting story ) to counter the NATO but really, they are not in a position to risk a direct war - and NATO isn't interested in such a conflict either. Nukes made war too expensive and risky. So, if Chinese rockets will be stationed in Moscow, this scenario will make a lot more sense. If that happens, however, the EU members will also massively ramp up their military budget because the whole European population will be more supportive of these measures. For example; right now even meeting the 2% required by the membership treaty is an issue in Germany ( I am German ) because there hasn't been any need for a full-strength army in thirty years that politics were able to translate to the general public, the wars in the middle east didn't make for good press so to speak. If Russia and China were seen as an alliance ( and they are already practising manoeuvres together so no formal treaties exist, we can all take a wild guess at what that inclines ), this wouldn't be the case any more which is also why the rhetoric in concerning this part of geopolitics is changing in the EU and in the west in general. Another aspect is that the US simply inhibits direct enemy activity through its massive military. While I am not a supporter of Trump by any means ( just like his predecessors who had similar positions ) he is not wrong when he says that Americans are paying for the peace of the western world. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism_in_Germany en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia%E2%80%93NATO_relations en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr#Cold_War_1955%E2%80%931990 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991

@@Arcaryon Indeed. The only militaries in Europe that are pretty strong are Great Britain and France. Germany has so much potential with her massive amount of factories. She could rival the other 2 European military powers, and even surpass them.

@@dodgydave6179 Again, all a question of the public sentiment for that one.

@@Arcaryon To be honest, even though many people aren't happy that most of Europe depends on British, French and American (mostly American) defence, there really isn't anything wrong with that. No country with nukes are ever going to start a conflict. For the first time in history, we no longer need to pour huge amounts of money to our militaries and underfund all over sectors. We don't need a royal navy that rules the waves as the Brits used to do. We don't need an amazing war strategist who absolutely changes everything we know about war like Napoleon did with France. We don't need big armies, because there are no threats, or threats that are absolutely miniscule and can be solved with diplomacy. So that begs the question, why are countries like the US, Russia and UK spending huge amounts of money in their armies, yet there are no big threats. Why can't we be like countries such as Germany who barely spends anything in their army, and yet is extremely peaceful and has a foreign policy to use pacifism, instead of jumping into battle like the Americans do all the time. I also guess, that that is too, another public sentiment that most of us ask ourselves from time to time.

But not all of them are battle worthy nor is it possible to call upon and equip such a large manforce, it takes time and in that time we lose valuable resources and soldiers

ага, а оружие и обучение где взять? а самое главное как спастись от авиации и ракет?)

@@itsfutureda 🤷🏻‍♀️ xaxax

lmao maybe wth ppl but the army is different as u can see in Ukraine war

@French& Scottish bro they have best air defence system you could defeat the army but never people the people of India ,china and Russia are too nationalist

AGREED

Right 👍👍

легко говорить, но мы не знаем реальные силы БРИКС. хватит заниматься дерьмовым патриотизмом

no lmao, chinese planes are literally american ripoffs from the 90's

Neither of the groups existed in 1936. Also, the UK owned India and France had a colonial empire, not to mention that China was fragmented.

Typical Western fantasies...

no lmao

no lmao, chinese planes are literally american ripoffs from the 90's

@@itsfutureda bro I hate China but he’s right. India and China hold like 30% of the world population lmao

Russia’s military might has waned significantly, and China has never been tested in battle before, as well as being poorly trained. India’s army is experienced but is behind the rest of the world in technology. Brazil and South Africa have very little to offer except as bases for the larger powers to operate out of.

Stalin join chat

=)))

:D thanks for the topic!

Lol

Brics não querem argentina

not really

Yeah, I doubt Europeans will fight against them. It’s not like the past, people want comfort.

Good thing it will never become a military alliance

Strong and peaceful, wise and brave Fighting the fight for the whole world to save We the people will ceaselessly strive To keep our great revolution alive Unfurl the banners, look at the screen Never before has such glory been seen Oceania Oceania Oceania 'Tis for thee Every deed, every thought 'tis for thee Every deed, every thought 'tis for thee

They still could wipe out Russia in a 1v1

Actually german destek alot too

@@The_WhiteSilverlmao whole Asia unites they can wipe out nato and us

@@armanelchapo9509 How exactly would they do that? You have yet to explain.

@@The_WhiteSilver lmao Russia china India japan and South Korea…. Japan best technology in world combined with most and best manpower and tanks