And, ur point is...

@@masada2828 God takes sin seriously and the story of Noah isn't the happy one we tell children.

@@ramptonarsecandle Perhaps you'd have preferred "account?"

@@ramptonarsecandle ,yea you to live in a fairytale, works both ways just sayin

Not only everyone but every single animal on land and apparently many on the seas, through no fault of their own.

Greetings @Adam Schaafsma, You are absolutely correct. If you want more content about the Flood's impact on the earth and what the pre-Flood world may have been like, we would recommend checking out 𝘙𝘰𝘤𝘬𝘴 & 𝘍𝘰𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘴 on our online store (isgenesishistory.com/product/beyond-genesis-1/). We actually have a coupon code that gives you an additional 25% off - ROCKS25. Feel free to use that as our gift to you!

In the beginning God protected the earth from UV & other harmful solar rays with a ocean of water in the upper atmosphere. "Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the heavens." Psalm 148:4 Also ck Genesis 1:6-11. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. I'm glad they believe in God in this day in time most would get CANCELED for this belief. But one can't his the evidence, Jesus is coming soon we are in the last days. A day for the lord is like 1 thousand years for man.

@@nFlames2🤷‍♂️

amen

This ones actually true

@@davidweeks3981 you don't believe there was a flood?

@@ramptonarsecandle Everything you just said is false. Noah was 600, there were 7000 animal classes on the arc and all those flood stories confirm the Bible and the Arc is the only flood story with a super detailed blue print for the only one with a sea worthy boat. My question for you is why on earth are you here if you don't believe it, I think you're searching for meaning in your life. If you will hear His voice harden not your heart. For He loves you and died for you. He will strengthen you and teach you virtue and endurance❤🙏✝Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life. And He has an answer for every thing, soften your heart AND COME TO HIM.

@@ramptonarsecandle"The preaching of the cross is to them that are perishing foolishness, but to us that believe it is the power of God" -1 Corinthians 1:18 "The fanatical atheists are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after a hard struggle. They are creatures who in their grudge against traditional religion as 'the opium of the masses' cannot hear the music of the spheres." -Albert Einstein Indeed you are here because you are a miserable creature and have nothing better to do than to be hell bent on proving life is ultimately meaningless. You are miserable and all you have is science falsely so called, which has ultimately no point because you are destined for the grave and to be forgotten. May God have mercy on your soul!

Especially if people back then we're anything like People now, and they tried to get away to high ground, they would have been the last to get hit.

Whatever it takes to rationalise the myth yeah?

@@ats-3693 lol, how joyous your life must be that you scroll through comment sections of videos you oppose and pick fights with people. You must be a social dynamo.

@@steakslapn9724 I'm not sure how you come to the conclusion that a youtube comment is reflective of someone's social life? Or maybe you don't, and that was just an attempt to insult? Either way it's irrelevant, my social life is fine thanks, a bit quieter these days by choice, I overdid it in the past and now while we are in this weird covid period of time I prefer to concentrate on my career. I watched this video because I am a geologist and geophysicist with 25 years experience working on projects around the world, and usually I have the attitude that whatever others believe is their business, but in this case whether you want to accept or believe it the material in the video is completely false, its dishonest, misleading, twisted half truths, some of it is lies, you can argue as much as you like, say whatever you want as a rebuttal, it makes no difference, the video is false, it's a typical example of someone twisting and bending actual truth to try force fit it to a fictional narrative, nobody except basically American young earth creationist Christians believe this rubbish, and I mean nobody, even most Christians know the actual age of our planet, I've actually worked on projects with religious geologists looking at sedimentary sequences full of marine fossils that lived millions of years ago, there was no argument about it, because its not possible to argue about it we were both holding irrefutable physical evidence, to suggest anything different would have been ridiculous, just like the claims in this video, guys selling out a science that has been well understood for a long long time, knowingly being dishonest to protect thier narrative because they are terrified if they let one little crack open in it then it may all crumble, too proud to even concede that if their religious story is true then it must be made to fit with reality, not the other way around. If truth must be bent and twisted to fit your story then there is something not right about your story, the truth is the truth and everyone is completely aware of the truth, except you guys.

@@ats-3693 oh actually I can use the KZfaq comment section to surmise all kinds of details about a person, I can assume you are obsessed with genealogy and more specifically your own white genealogy based on the fact it was the most important concept in your mind when deciding on a KZfaq name. I can assume you are a hate filled atheist because your idea of killing time is clicking on young earth creation videos and insulting the people who believe it, that is an motivated act you are not just stumbling onto these videos in your auto play, you're actively looking for people to insult, and because of all that information I can also assume you grew up being bullied, because it's text book, childhood victims revel in returning the favor to the world while hiding behind a computer screen. I actually never claimed to be a young earth creationist, I am currently entertaining the thought because I can do that without my entire belief system breaking down. We aren't here to debate young earth, we are here because you actually wonder why we have found confidence and happiness in God, and you can't find it in your own secular life. You think bringing Christians doubt and shame will somehow bandage your doubt and shame in your self. I know these things because Its like looking at a neon sign. Clear as day to someone like me.

Yeah 😂 just terrific 🤣🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

+@@richardlewin9282 And 100% scientific as well - unlike the evolutionary and materialistic mythology that is crumbling at an ever-increasing rate as one pillar after another collapses because of MODERN and FACTUAL science. Whale evolution is gone - and horse evolution, spontaneous generation is gone - vestigial organs are gone - long ages past for dinosaurs are gone - life coming from a warm pond is gone - there are just NO rational EVOLUTIONARY claims left that make sense and stand up to scrutiny. Even mutation/natural selection is abandoned . . . "Yeah 😂 just terrific 🤣🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦"

Your hopeless 😂👏👏🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑

*terrifying

@@travisbickle3835 Only to scientific illitetates

@@velkyn1 IF YOU ARE COMPLETELY WITH OUT SIN,. THEN THROW THE FIRST STONE,

Jesus is not God, please stop

+@@HistoryandReviews STILL spreading your anti-Biblical false god lies everywhere? Come clean and be HONEST, you are a WATCHTOWER cultist aren't you?

@@HistoryandReviews You will bow your knee to Him.

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ Jesus did not create me. He IS NOT God!

@@GORF_EMPIRE I know one, he bent his knees in front of his wife for a marriage proposal. Was it his creator? this is not an argument!

Actually, Its a STARK commentary on GOD's love of humanity - he put much of it out of its endless misery. It was the meeting of LOVE and JUSTICE.

@@paulrobinson9318 Quite the contrary Sir! Psalms 5:4-6 [4]For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee. [5]The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity. [6]Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing: the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.

@@toddhurst4041 This misuse of anachronistic Bible means WHAT to intelligent leople?

@@paulrobinson9318 the Bible is the infallible word of God. Jesus said, Luke 17:26-30 [26]And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. [27]They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. [28]Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; [29]But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. [30]Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

@@toddhurst4041 AGAIN what are your anachronistic quotes attempting to prove? You have left me confused.

Nehemia Gordon and Keith Johnson Gospel Pearls ❤ that's some good meat

"In to the meat of the details"

I think he has very nice theory on his hands. Next he needs to make simulated flood scene where he manages to make similar layers of sediment with constant flooding during those 40 days and the drying period after that. Good luck with that. I wont be holding my breath. Assuming God has humor, he would be laughing through his teeth. But seriously if we assume the creation theory is correct then we can also assume that God made everything else that seemed to exist before that just for our amusement. Assuming that who could deny that the world wasnt actually created today?

@@viljosavolainen2286 Job 40-41 Easy-to-Read Version 40 Then the Lord said to Job, 2 “You wanted to argue with God All-Powerful. You wanted to correct me and prove that I was wrong. So give me your answer!” 3 Then Job answered the Lord: 4 “I am not worthy to speak! What can I say to you? I cannot answer you! I will put my hand over my mouth. 5 I spoke once, but I will not speak again. I spoke twice, but I will not say anything more.” 6 Then the Lord spoke to Job again from the storm: 7 “Brace yourself[a] and get ready to answer the questions I will ask you. 8 “Are you trying to show that I am unfair? Are you trying to look innocent by saying that I am guilty? 9 Are your arms as strong as mine? Do you have a voice like mine that is as loud as thunder? 10 If so, you can be proud and wear glory and honor like clothes. 11 If you are as powerful as God, then show your anger! Punish those who are proud and humble them. 12 Yes, just look at the proud and make them humble. Crush those evil people where they stand. 13 Bury them all in the dirt. Wrap their bodies up and put them in their graves. 14 If you can do any of these things, then even I will praise you. And I will admit that you can save yourself by your own power. 15 “Look at the behemoth.[b] I made the behemoth, and I made you. He eats grass like a cow. 16 But he has great strength in his body. The muscles in his stomach are powerful. 17 His tail stands strong like a cedar tree. His leg muscles are very strong. 18 His bones are as strong as bronze. His legs are like iron bars. 19 The behemoth is the most amazing animal I made, but I can defeat him. 20 He eats the grass that grows on the hills where the wild animals play. 21 He lies under the lotus plants. He hides among the reeds of the swamp. 22 The lotus plants hide him in their shade. He lives under the willow trees that grow near the river. 23 If the river floods, the behemoth will not run away. He is not afraid if the Jordan River splashes on his face. 24 No one can blind his eyes and capture him. No one can catch him in a trap. 41 “Can you catch Leviathan[c] with a fishhook? Can you tie his tongue with a rope? 2 Can you put a rope through his nose or a hook through his jaw? 3 Will he beg you to let him go free? Will he speak to you with gentle words? 4 Will he make an agreement with you and promise to serve you forever? 5 Will you play with Leviathan as you would play with a bird? Will you put a rope on him so that your girls can play with him? 6 Will fishermen try to buy him from you? Will they cut him into pieces and sell him to the merchants? 7 Can you throw spears into his skin or head? 8 “If you ever lay a hand on Leviathan, you will never do it again! Just think about the battle that would be! 9 Do you think you can defeat him? Well, forget it! There is no hope. Just looking at him will scare you! 10 No one is brave enough to wake him up and make him angry. “Well, no one can challenge me either![d] 11 I owe nothing to anyone. Everything under heaven belongs to me.[e] 12 “I will tell you about Leviathan’s legs, his strength, and his graceful shape. 13 No one can pierce his skin. It is like armor![f] 14 No one can force him to open his jaws. The teeth in his mouth scare people. 15 His back has rows of shields tightly sealed together. 16 They are so close to each other that no air can pass between them. 17 The shields are joined to each other. They hold together so tightly that they cannot be pulled apart. 18 When Leviathan sneezes, it is like lightning flashing out. His eyes shine like the light of dawn. 19 Burning torches come from his mouth. Sparks of fire shoot out. 20 Smoke pours from his nose like burning weeds under a boiling pot. 21 His breath sets coals on fire, and flames shoot from his mouth. 22 His neck is very powerful. People are afraid and run away from him. 23 There is no soft spot in his skin. It is as hard as iron. 24 His heart is like a rock; he has no fear. It is as hard as a millstone. 25 When he gets up, even the strongest people[g] are afraid. They run away when he swings his tail. 26 Swords, spears, and darts only bounce off when they hit him. These weapons don’t hurt him at all! 27 He breaks iron as easily as straw. He breaks bronze like rotten wood. 28 Arrows don’t make him run away. Rocks thrown at him seem as light as chaff. 29 When a wood club hits him, it feels to him like a piece of straw. He laughs when anyone throws a spear at him. 30 The skin on his belly is like sharp pieces of broken pottery. He leaves tracks in the mud like a threshing board. 31 He stirs up the water like a boiling pot. He makes it bubble like a pot of boiling oil. 32 When he swims, he leaves a sparkling path behind him. He stirs up the water and makes it white with foam. 33 No animal on earth is like him. He is an animal made without fear. 34 He looks down on the proudest of creatures. He is king over all the wild animals.”

Ask, and you will receive.

We're glad you enjoyed this video!

They've got their agenda to prove - why bother them with evidence?

Pete Chimney - _"..one also has to explain why we see evaporites.... within the entire geologic section."_ *It's an important point, and people need to be aware of this. While the salts you mentioned are known to be evaporites, the massive deposits are not from evaporation. To comprehend this, you must first know the actual origin of salt. Sadly, very few people including geologists and other scientists possess that knowledge... nor do they understand how most minerals form. Do you??*

@@RC6790 - _"I know, why don't you?"_ *Awesome! Time to shine!! What is the ORIGIN of salt??*

@@RC6790 - _"there is a whole science to it and it does not conform to a mythologic bible"_ *Nothing but crickets from you? I'm not surprised. Most likely you know you'll be exposed as a pseudointellectual the moment you try to answer, or you have a feeling that the answer actually validates biblical narratives... and you'd be right about that.* _"I have even grown crystals and studied Minerals and their formation"_ *Ok, let's give you another chance to display your higher education and deeper understanding - Tell us how granite forms. How about quartz? Non-vesicular basalt? Non-vesicular obsidian? Limestone? Sandstone? I don't care.. take your pick.. or just tell us about the crystals you studied? The specific minerals?*

@@freemind.. I was unaware there was a non-evaporite origin to salt. What is it?

I pondered this a few minutes in

@@paulgarrett4474 the Bible is true Humankind has been here 6025 years. You’ll understand one day 😉

Add to that the fact that the grains or clasts that make up sedimentary rocks can also be easily identified as the preexisting rock type they originated from, they may be from volcanic, metamorphic, or even sedimentary rocks, in many sedimentary rocks there are layers that contain large clasts of a preexisting generation of sedimentary rock, so somehow during this flood sedimentary sequences were layed down in a depositional environment and were cemented into a sedimentary rock which was then eroded and broken down into rocks and grains, which were then deposited again, and then cemented into another sedimentary rock. And if a sedimentary rock is made up of clasts of a preexisting generation of sedimentary rock then the grains and clasts within those clasts can also be identified and they are often from yet another earlier generation of preexisting sedimentary rock. And to even further complicate things these clasts are often a metamorphic rock with sedimentary origins - a sediment, which is the eroded remains of a preexisting rock of whatever type, that has been deposited as layers then cemented into a sedimentary rock, then buried deep enough for heat and pressure to transform it into a metamorphic rock, then uplifted and eroded and deposited as sediments again, then cemented into another sedimentary rock.

@@achristfollowingturnbullma8237 Of course it is. Of course. Do you understand the concept of delusion?

YES. And it makes a HUGE difference if you slowly pour in the sand and aggregate, or if you mix them up and let them settle - we see this in Gravel pits all over the WORLD -

+@@ramptonarsecandle WHY continue to show your ignorance? Your insult is based on WHAT facts? NONE!! "James "liar for Jesus" Tour - yeah we all need him"

+@@ramptonarsecandle Maybe you could leave a LINK rather than an insult? "@Paul Robinson google James tour liar for Jesus and you’ll see Maybe do some research before leaving crass comments?"

+@@ramptonarsecandle NOPE - you made the claim - you provide the EVIDENCE - calling someone a liar for denying mythology about the fictitious age of the earth is hypocrisy. The REAL liars are those that ignore the EVIDENCE for a young earth . . .and continue to deceive others with false claims of an ancient earth. "It won't let me post links but I'm sure you can type JT liar for jesus into a search engine."

@@paulrobinson9318 when you say 'those,' you mean basically EVERYONE, right? Pretty much all of China, the vast majority of mainland Europe, 70% of the UK, , most of Russia, pretty much all of Scandinavia, many practicing Jews/Catholics/ a much higher proportion of Muslims than you might think; practically all Hindys and Buddhists; most practicing Christians, too for that matter; in fact, practically the entire modern free-thinking world with 2000 years of applied science behind it... that's who you mean right? And they are all lying about Manu/Gilgamesh/Noah's ark containing a T-Rex because... what exactly? Just wondering why literally billions of people would lie at once and if there is room in hell for all of them. Even your hero Tour(whose rebuttal of self-assembling atoms is v.difficult for a laymen to argue with, I concur (but this has nothing to do with a 6000yr old earth, scientifically) can do no better than to speculate people are fiddling with results where genetics are concerned (no evidence for it whatsoever); he knows recent findings in that domain are hard to explain in the absence of evolution, and Tour himself doesn't touch dinosaurs on a boat or a 6000 year old earth on the personal statement of his website. "As for many of the details and the time-spans, I personally become less clear. Some may ask, What’s “less clear” about the text that reads, “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth”? That is a fair question, and I wish I had an answer that would satisfy them. But I do not because I remain less clear. So, in addition to my chemically based scientific resistance to a macroevolutionary proposal, I am also theologically reticent to embrace it (a 6000yr old) Earth just thrown together by magic in 6 days) - James Tour" ... Everyone is free to believe whatever they want - sure, but you have to ask yourself, if Ham's 'science' is really that great, why won't Tour vouch for it? And if Tour isn't sure of a 6000 yr old Earth (given how smart he clearly is and how dedicated he is to God), why are you??? All the best. x

+@@randopedia1 "@Paul Robinson when you say 'those,' you mean basically EVERYONE, right? " WELL since you didn't include my COMMENT - I'll pass . . . CUT and paste is your friend. "Pretty much all of China, the vast majority of mainland Europe, 70% of the UK, , most of Russia, pretty much all of Scandinavia, many practicing Jews/Catholics/ a much higher proportion of Muslims than you might think; " That's an assumption you CANNOT prove - BUT you know from a scientific perspective it ONLY takes ONE person with the RIGHT idea to be correct - Ignaz Semmelweis comes to mind . . . once laughed at he was run out of medicine for his handwashing practice - NOW standard and required in EVERY medical facility in the WORLD. A PRACTICE by the way that was FIRST required in the Mosaic BIBLE. HOW did THEY know? GOD told them - just like he told them in the SAME law that he created the earth in 6 days. The Sabbath of the Mosaic law is enduring PROOF of 6 days for creation. And J Harland Bretz - also mocked and ridiculed all his life for his claim that the badlands of the North West were the result of an enormous lake the size of Lake Erie breaching and carrying all the topsoil and vegetation off and into the pacific (200 miles into the Pacific) - tossing out boulders the size of large houses into the mountains along its path - called 'erratics' - TOO BIBLICAL they said - but today its standard teaching - SO, even if appealing to the masses was NOT a logical fallacy - it still has NO bearing on FACTS. "practically all Hindys and Buddhists; most practicing Christians, too for that matter; in fact, practically the entire modern free-thinking world" Same argument - so what? STILL fallacious reasoning. STILL irrelavant. "with 2000 years of applied science behind it... " HEY - get a grip - CREATION ex Nihlo was the STANDARD belief by MOST of the people of the world til late 1800's - YES the demonic Darwinist fantasy was based on ancient pagan Egyptian mythology - BUT still MOST of the world, and most of the religious accepts a CREATOR of some kind. And of those 18th and 19th century men who GAVE us OUR Science today - the GREAT majority were Biblical CREATIONISTS. CREATION made scientific and BIBLICAL sense. NOT only that even many RECENT scientific accomplishments were 6 day Creationist enterprises - the SPACE program had 6 day Creationists from the top to the scientists to the astronauts. "that's who you mean right? " YUP - where is your EVIDENCE that I am NOT? "And they are all lying about Manu/Gilgamesh/Noah's ark containing a T-Rex because... what exactly?" That is INCOMPREHENSIBLE - NO there WERE NO adult T-rex on the ark - there may have been a pair of chicks the size of a poodle, but no adults - that would be absurd. There is NO logic to your questions. WE have NO idea if TREX survived the flood - but many dinosaurs did - and that is all that was needed to preserve a pair of each KIND of animals. We know this from many written and artistic accounts. I have NO concept of what you think you are asking in that question apart from this. "Just wondering why literally billions of people would lie at once and if there is room in hell for all of them." I am NOT aware that BILLIONs of people have any interest or opinion or for that matter ever even HEARD of the ark. Or the ark - or whatever you are trying to debate so poorly with NOT a shred of EVIDENCE and vague and unconnected questions. Even MOST scientists never use evolution in ANYTHING they do - the ONLY science that has any connection to EVOLUTION is EVOLUTIONARY biology - many SCIENTISTS who do physics, chemistry, etc - have be NO idea at all about evolution and cannot tell you ANYTHING other than what the learned in university - they have NO interest in the subject. YOU cannot lie about what you KNOW nothing of . . . That's absurdity. " Even your hero Tour(whose rebuttal of self-assembling atoms is v.difficult for a laymen to argue with, I concur (but this has nothing to do with a 6000yr old earth, scientifically) " TOUR is hardly a hero - we are diametrically opposed on many issues. Considering I just discovered him - he CANNOT be a hero. BUT he is NOT a proponent of millions of years - and when he discusses it he does so with the air of someone reporting dogma, farmed out opinion, that he has NO interest in. May I say - NOT one of your questions/statement have been slightly rational? And all fall prey to the fault of logical fallacy. MY reference to him is to demonstrate from a leading chemist, that its IMPOSSIBLE for amino acids to form in the wild - I have known that since the Miller experiments (YES I am that old and then I was an evolutionist) - proved intelligent interference was necessary for the the most elemental Aminos. And that is ignoring racism which occurs in the wild in equal numbers - cancelling out each other.. "can do no better than to speculate people are fiddling with results where genetics are concerned (no evidence for it whatsoever); HUH? "he knows recent findings in that domain are hard to explain in the absence of evolution, " That is a deliberate and blatant lie. CITE him on this - you are seriously mistaken. That is the WHOLE point of his presentation - that NO SCIENCE exists; NO conditions are possible; that COULD allow life and the necessary chemicals to form - and even IF they did, that would NOT get you anything useful for EVOLUTION.. ONLY DNA can produce the essential elements for DNA, and all those essential elements are REQUIRED for DNA. Its an IMPOSSIBILITY for DNA to be formed in any evolutionary scenario - Watson said that - NOTHING has changed. "and Tour himself doesn't touch dinosaurs on a boat or a 6000 year old earth on the personal statement of his website." SO what does that prove? - you said he didn't deal with it and now mock me for HIS honesty about NOT being a scholar of the flood? YOU seem to border frequently on the irrational. " "As for many of the details and the time-spans, I personally become less clear. Some may ask, What’s “less clear” about the text that reads, “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth”? " That SHOULD be an AHA, Penny Drop moment . . . And considering that GOD put that into the LEVITICAL law that was DETAIL specific - even how to POOP was covered - GOD was NOT guessing. "That is a fair question, and I wish I had an answer that would satisfy them. " WHY not accept the WORDS of the CREATOR - who by the way, was there - as a FACT. WHY do you think GOD would lie about something upon which the entire gospel is based? "But I do not because I remain less clear. So, in addition to my chemically based scientific resistance to a macroevolutionary proposal, I am also theologically reticent to embrace it (a 6000yr old) Earth just thrown together by magic in 6 days) - James Tour" ... It does NOT support any of YOUR claims. GOD gave specific time frames several times - JESUS confirmed everything Genesis says as TRUE. He detailed the ORDER in which it all was created in Genesis - and there are many SCIENTIFIC reasons why that TIMELINE is a better story then the long ages the devil promotes - you CANNOT be a Biblical CHRISTIAN and NOT accept the 6 days creation - the ENTIRE Word of GOD is based on it. Look - simple math - at 1.5 BILLION years the moon and the earth would be in CONTACT. THINK about it - we KNOW the prescession rate - BUT to be an old earth fool you need an earth 4.5 BILLION years - and that is NOT long enough for even the BEST estimates to bring us to the complexity of life we have today by EVOLUTION.. Where are the several miles of fossil bones that would be a result of even a couple more thousand years? OUR population is almost to the penny what one would expect restarting with 8 people - 6 of them childbearing age - after the flood - add another 1000 years and there are people a mile thick on earth. "Everyone is free to believe whatever they want - sure, but you have to ask yourself, if Ham's 'science' is really that great, why won't Tour vouch for it? " Because he's a CHEMIST? "And if Tour isn't sure of a 6000 yr old Earth (given how smart he clearly is and how dedicated he is to God), why are you???" Because I am a BIBLE SCHOLAR and 6000 years - at least less than 15000 - that is MY genealogical quirk - DEMANDS it. " All the best. x " WHY do you have a problem with what the BIBLE plainly says? WHY do you have an issue with the FLOOD - that is OBVIOUS to any amateur or professional geologist - I used to go on digs with a national museum - and EVIDENCE for the flood is EVERYWHERE. single deposits of sandstone that span CONTINENTS - ocean bottom fossils in marine limestone atop Mt EVEREST - all that is ONLY possible with a GLOBAL flood. BY the way - Ham is only ONE scientist among many TENS of THOUSANDS who believe the BIBLE. There is NOT a single reason NOT to do so. WHEN I was in CHINA - one of my university students said that in CHINA you are free to mock evolution - BUT not the govt - in AMERICA you are free to mock the GOVT but NOT evolution. Evolution is demonic. Like in the GARDEN, its 'has GOD really said for the twentieth century? IT casts doubt on SCRIPTURE and makes GOD a liar. ANY ONE who has put all the pieces together with the BIBLE comes to the same conclusion that JESUS did - the BIBLE is 100% accurate. WHY would you ever question GOD? Is he NOT capable of telling the TRUTH? WHY is there evidence for the FLOOD in over 250 indigenous tribes - with remarkable similar stories? BECAUSE it happened and is part of cultural legends around the globe. WHY not trust GOD? YOU do for salvation - why not for history? IF you doubt GOD on HIS account of HISTORY - how can you trust him for eternity?

Because the time periods of their existence are separated by millions of years. And yes I know that you know that already, I just couldn't resist answering a sensible question, even though it wasn't actually aimed at someone who actually knew the true answer.

Believe it is related to bone density.

@@nikkibrowning4546 No that has nothing to do with it, and in any case more than just bones are fossilised, there is absolutely no human/dinosaur overlap anywhere in the fossil record because there are millions of years separating their existences.

@@ats-3693 : Fred and Wilma beg to differ. Barney too !

@@PerryMarshallScott Haha yes, I'm a geologist/geophysicist with 25 years experience and we are struggling big time to understand how the Flintstones fit into the geological record 😂

And why is it that you never find fossils of, say, wooly mammoths in the same rock strata as tyrannosaurs or other dinosaurs? How come the La Brea Tar Pits have the remains sabre-tooth cats and mammoths and dogs and coyotes and mice and skunks and lions and bats and cheetahs and bison and cougars and bears and rabbits and horses and rattlesnakes and herons, and even the skeleton of one woman, but absolutely no remains of Utahraptors or certopsians or dromeosaurs or any other dinosaur, large or small?

I enter " The Flintstones " into evidence courtesy of Hannah Barbara.

​@@keith6706why is it why find collagen and blood vessels in dinosaur bone supposedly 65 million years old? Why? Because it's all made up, and very little of the fossil record has been unearthed. The hubris from your group think is laughable

I take my hat off to the poor little penguins. They had to waddle all the way from the North and South Pole, jump on the boat then waddle all the back after the cruise ended...

The force of the water shooting out from the ground, and the current that was strong enough to sweep across the continents, as the rocks prove.

Omega Unvaxxt - _"How did all the different animals get dispersed across the globe after the flood ?"_ *Before the Flood, and for a few hundred years afterward, the continents were still undivided. The animals could walk, slither, crawl, hop or fly all the way to Noah, and all the way home afterward. Pangaea didn't divide 200 hundred million years ago. The Global Flood was both the cause and the mechanism for the breaking apart of the supercontinent. Once divided, continental drift carried each separate landmass to its current location.*

@@RC6790 - _"With modern satellites we know the velocity of the continental drift and at the present speed a time period of 100s of thousands of years is required."_ *Super helpful! What velocity do the modern satellites tell us they were moving when Pangaea first divided?* _"...at the present speed a time period of 100s of thousands of years is required."_ *So, you're saying Pangaea might have divided within the last several 100s of thousands of years?* _"Now if only you can sell people on the idea that the movements were so much greater in the past, not a shred of evidence"_ *Wait, we are told it happened around 200 million years ago. You just declared that at the speed observed today, it would take less than 1 million. So, why would they be moving so much faster today?? Now you're disputing your own facts? If it didn't need to take 200 million years, then why does it need to take 100s of thousands of years? If the speed can change, why could it not have been MUCH faster 4000 years ago?? It could have been, and it was.* *Help us understand this too, genius... What was the cause and mechanism for the breakup of Pangaea in the first place?? Also, if the Earth's surface simply formed from cooling magma, why is the oceanic crust so different from the continental crust in both composition and thickness..? If you knew the answer, you'd know how wrong you are.*

​ @RC6790 - _"it is beyond physics for the crust to move at a speed to separate the continental land masses in 4,000 years."_ *Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. You argue from IGNORANCE. Do you know WHY some believe that the laws of physics preclude rapid continental drift? The IDEAS upon which that ASSUMPTION is based are incorrect; they have never been observed or validated in any way, and thus, they are not science. Your entire education is replete with such errors. Just as you were proven wrong as to the quantity of subcrustal water in the Earth, so shall you be proven wrong with this. The Earth did not form as you believe, nor is its composition what you believe it to be. You claim to have much experience with crystal formation, and to have spent much time studying them. If so, you should already sense that the crystalline structures of the majority of the crustal minerals could not have formed from a melt.. and you should already know why.* *Again... What was the cause and mechanism for the breakup of Pangaea in the first place?? Also, if the Earth was once a ball of magma floating in space, and its surface simply cooled to form the crust upon which we live, then why is the oceanic crust so different from the continental crust in both composition and thickness..? Why is the continental crust roughly 6X thicker and is primarily granite rather than basalt? Why would 2 entirely different crustal types form in vastly different thicknesses from the same blob of melted rock?*

LOL...born blonde?

You're a fool

@@apmarman1096 The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.

Hello @MrUndefeated_1, We're glad that you've been enjoying our channel! There are currently no confirmed fossils or artifacts from humans who drowned during the Flood. We are still attempting to understand why this is, but see the timestamp 8:33 on this video for how paleontologist Dr. Marcus Ross responds to this question.

Since the "fountains" of the deep" were opened, as the flood waters receded, the creatures that drowned were pulled down into "the deep" - this is why we are not told that Noah and his sons walked upon thousands of dead creatures on the ground after they left the ark.

@@WhirledPublishing that is why one might expect to find more in the depths of ocean sediment than on land. The question is are there any groups doing that?

​@@zotthefirstjs At the time of Noah's flood, our oceans did not exist - our continents also did not exist - our Earth's expansion came AFTER the great flood of Genesis - this includes the formation of our mountains which also came AFTER Noah's flood - Mount Ararat was a "mount" at the time of Noah's flood - it was about as high as the ark was long - now the "mount" is over 5,000 meters in elevation ... Mount Ararat is over 16,000 ft high now ... Since you've been lied to all your life, you don't understand all this - you don't know where the "Earth" came from, you don't know where our ocean waters came from .... so you come up with ideas as if you're a child. It's not your fault - you've been intentionally dumbed down, drugged up, poisoned, numbed and programmed with lies and lunacy all your life. We are told the answers to all this but instead of paying attention, you allowed yourself to be deceived.

@@zotthefirstjs dunno what the comment below you is on, but to answer your question, no they are not looking. Archeological digs are expensive as is, let alone trying to did in the depths of an ocean or sea. But part of what made fossils form where they did was the tsunami effects as waters would rise a bit, then recede, allowing that layer of sediment to be exposed to sun before another layer of sediment would be put over the top. Anything dragged out to the ocean would likely be largely decomposed or consumed by ocean life before it could be buried

@@jndvs95 does it not stand to reason that if we have these sediment layers above sea level. That near land these same layers should also be in the ocean close to what is dry land now? To which there probably was more of (dry land)in the past, since the waters deposited on land had to recede into the oceans to raise them to there current levels

Gk Mary Schweitzer, the paleontologist who made the discovery of the dinosaur tissue, is a fervent Christian who accepts evolution and the old age for the Earth.

The fossil had collagen remnant. Not meat or tissue of any sort that had dna.

Friday, Saturday, or Sunday? pick a faith (islam/jewish/christian), either they are all right, all wrong, or one is right. You have a 1 in 3 chance of being right, and a 100% chance of being a total chump if you actually believe, truly, that the bible is right, and science is wrong. Question - where did all the water go, after this massive flood?

Jesus is our Sabbath.

@@jeffcope7388 wrong

@@mistag3860 Jewish came before Christian and Muslim. The real sabbath is friday sundown to Saturday sundown

@@HistoryandReviews then the book of Hebrews is wrong.

WHAT Noag Nimrod fight? Only Noah and his family existed at the end of the flood

@Stan Gore Geology and scripture suggests otherwise.

@Stan Gore Of course it was . Read your Bible and look at your geology. The flood was worldwide hence common depositions across continents.

I think that when Noah left the ark, it was already super cold, and a massive ice sheet covered north America already. That is my hypothesis anyway. In the days of Peleg the land was divided, which was probably due to all that ice melting worldwide, flooding areas that people could previously walk across, like the land bridge between Asia and North America 🌎

@Stan Gore it was

Because the ones on the bottom are older than the ones on the top. Isn’t that logical?

No

@@HistoryandReviews UTTER NONSENSE exceeded ONLY by the quality of your EVIDENCE!

@@paulrobinson9318 your evidence is elephant and whale bones that they claim are “dinosaurs “ 😂😂

@@HistoryandReviews Really? And your EVIDENCE is what exactly? You don't think professional paleontogists would know? You know more? Somehow or other you seem to be blowing smoke based on IGNORANCE. WHY?

@@paulrobinson9318 i Love how heated you’re getting over my factual beliefs 😂

All the PhD's in the Earth Sciences are B.S.

+@@WhirledPublishing At least imaginary. BUT NOT for the REASONS, you think!!

+@@WhirledPublishing Having a PhD may be irrelevant to some - BUT it means you know a LOT more than MOST about a subject - and there are SO MANY Creationists with PhD's in relevant areas of SCIENCE that your comment is TRULY irrelevant to reality. "All the PhD's in the Earth Sciences are B.S." NOT when they have EVIDENCE to support them. And that does NOT include any EVOLUTIONARY myths.

@@WhirledPublishing Then why does Dr. Ross flaunt his?

Why does the left hate so much? Did their fathers not hug them? Poor little fella.

@RichardBrown-kd5vz Thank you so much for your support! :-)

@@davidweeks3981 of the truth

It is invented fiction, the intention of which is to retrofit an implausible concoction to give comfort to an uncritically privileged "belief." Embarrassing.

Love your comment!~

His era and Noah was the Prophet.

POINT?

2 “Why are you using your ignorance to deny my providence? 3 Now get ready to fight, for I am going to demand some answers from you, and you must reply. 4 “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell me, if you know so much. 5 Do you know how its dimensions were determined, and who did the surveying? 6-7 What supports its foundations, and who laid its cornerstone as the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy? 8-9 “Who decreed the boundaries of the seas when they gushed from the depths? Who clothed them with clouds and thick darkness 10 and barred them by limiting their shores, 11 and said, ‘Thus far and no farther shall you come, and here shall your proud waves stop’? 12 “Have you ever once commanded the morning to appear and caused the dawn to rise in the east? 13 Have you ever told the daylight to spread to the ends of the earth, to end the night’s wickedness? 14 Have you ever robed the dawn in red, 15 and disturbed the haunts of wicked men, and stopped the arm raised to strike? 16 “Have you explored the springs from which the seas come, or walked in the sources of their depths? 17-18 Has the location of the gates of death been revealed to you? Do you realize the extent of the earth? Tell me about it if you know! 19 Where does the light come from, and how do you get there? Or tell me about the darkness. Where does it come from? 20 Can you find its boundaries, or go to its source? 21 But of course you know all this! For you were born before it was all created, and you are so very experienced! 22-23 “Have you visited the treasuries of the snow, or seen where hail is made and stored? For I have reserved it for the time when I will need it in war. 24 Where is the path to the distribution point of light? Where is the home of the east wind? 25-27 Who dug the valleys for the torrents of rain? Who laid out the path for the lightning, causing the rain to fall upon the barren deserts, so that the parched and barren ground is satisfied with water and tender grass springs up? 28 “Has the rain a father? Where does dew come from? 29 Who is the mother of the ice and frost? 30 For the water changes and turns to ice as hard as rock. 31 “Can you hold back the stars? Can you restrain Orion or Pleiades? 32 Can you ensure the proper sequence of the seasons, or guide the constellation of the Bear with her satellites across the heavens? 33 Do you know the laws of the universe and how the heavens influence the earth? 34 Can you shout to the clouds and make it rain? 35 Can you make lightning appear and cause it to strike as you direct it? 36 “Who gives intuition and instinct?[a] 37-38 Who is wise enough to number all the clouds? Who can tilt the water jars of heaven, when everything is dust and clods? 39-40 Can you stalk prey like a lioness, to satisfy the young lions’ appetites as they lie in their dens or lie in wait in the jungle? 41 Who provides for the ravens when their young cry out to God as they try to struggle up from their nest in hunger?

+@@billburkhalter411 I am baffled and bewildered by what you think you are proving; what POINT do you think you were making? OK its from the LIVING BIBLE - Its about JOB, BUT does it in any way expand on the video?

Someone fetch Sauron a beer

Someone fetch Sauron a beer

I agree. But it should also matter when scientists say the flood of Noah never happened even though Jesus referred to it as something that really happened. At that point you have to go along with what Jesus said and disagree with the scientists.

Thank you for making this rational and sensible comment. I'm a geologist and geophysicist with over 25 years experience with mineral and mining exploration. Over the years I've worked with many geoscientists who also happen to be religious, some Christian some Muslim, and I've never had any disagreements with any of these guys about the age and geological history of our planet. I have actually worked on projects in the field where the sedimentary sequences are teeming with Devonian Ammoniod fossils, some of the other geophysicists and geologists on this project were Christian and Muslim, there was no doubt among any of us about the ~350million year age of the Devonian limestone sequences these fossils were in. I'm not religious but I believe that there is a spiritual dimension to us, life, and the whole universe, for all I know parts of the Christian belief system and Bible may reflect or describe some aspects of the spirituality that I feel. But regardless spirituality and religious beliefs have to fit with what we obviously see and is indisputable, it's not valid to try twist and bend observable reality to make it align with a spiritual or religious belief system, and there is no actual need to do that, it's all about how you interpret what is written in religious texts, which as a Christian Geologist you obviously already know 🙏

He absolutely doesn’t. Here is a guy who has started with the idea that the world is young and that a flood caused all of this. He has just claimed that the layers are ordered like that. He hasn’t proved it. Also how come all the lowest layers are of animals that don’t exist anymore. Also we can date the rock they are found in, they can date the fossils, I mean there are so many false assumptions in this video and all because why? So that you can believe the book to be true when the natural world screams that it isn’t

@@Sbazz89 1. The many animals that we see in this period and not anymore were killed off in the flood. 2. You can’t accurately date these rocks with the methods they use. In fact, there are dinosaur bones discovered with soft delicate tissue. Soft delicate tissue decays fast and is not expected to be present in these samples. If you date the rocks, these bones are millions of years old, but if you use the soft tissue these bones are only thousands of years old

@@Sbazz89 It is their failure to read the Bible and get the sense of it. Adam was created at the end of the SIXTH DAY. That means 6,100 plus years have passed sense Adams creation and WE ARE STILL IN the SEVENTH DAY and we are still not at the very end of the SEVENTH DAY nor began the EIGHTH DAY yet today. What does this mean? It means mans time is not the same as Gods time for the creative days. In fact to the Angels alone 1 day to them is equal to 1,000 years to mankind. However to God these creative days most likely are thousands and thousands of mankind's years in length. Revelations speaks about after Armageddon there are 1,000 years of peace but still no mention of the end of the SEVENTH DAY AND ITS ALREADY BEEN OVER 6,100 YEARS. Genesis,,,, THE FIRST CREATIVE DAY,,,, 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.+ 2 Now the earth was formless and desolate,* and there was darkness upon the surface of the watery deep,*+ and God’s active force*+ was moving about over the surface of the waters.+ 3 And God said: “Let there be light.” Then there was light.+ 4 After that God saw that the light was good, and God began to divide the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, but the darkness he called Night.+ And there was evening and there was morning, a first day. END 1 THE SECOND CREATIVE DAY,,,, 6 Then God said: “Let there be an expanse+ between the waters, and let there be a division between the waters and the waters.”+ 7 Then God went on to make the expanse and divided the waters beneath the expanse from the waters above the expanse.+ And it was so. 8 God called the expanse Heaven.* And there was evening and there was morning, a second day. END 2 THE THIRD CREATIVE DAY,,,, 9 Then God said: “Let the waters under the heavens be collected together into one place, and let the dry land appear.”+ And it was so. 10 God called the dry land Earth,+ but the collecting of the waters, he called Seas.+ And God saw that it was good.+ 11 Then God said: “Let the earth cause grass to sprout, seed-bearing plants and fruit trees according to their kinds, yielding fruit along with seed on the earth.” And it was so. 12 And the earth began to produce grass, seed-bearing plants+ and trees yielding fruit along with seed, according to their kinds. Then God saw that it was good. 13 And there was evening and there was morning, a third day. END 3 THE FOURTH CREATIVE DAY,,,, 14 Then God said: “Let there be luminaries*+ in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night,+ and they will serve as signs for seasons and for days and years.+ 15 They will serve as luminaries in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth.” And it was so. 16 And God went on to make the two great luminaries, the greater luminary for dominating the day+ and the lesser luminary for dominating the night, and also the stars.+ 17 Thus God put them in the expanse of the heavens to shine upon the earth 18 and to dominate by day and by night and to make a division between the light and the darkness.+ Then God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day. END 4 THE FIFTH CREATIVE DAY,,,, 20 Then God said: “Let the waters swarm with living creatures,* and let flying creatures fly above the earth across the expanse of the heavens.”*+ 21 And God created the great sea creatures* and all living creatures* that move and swarm in the waters according to their kinds and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 With that God blessed them, saying: “Be fruitful and become many and fill the waters of the sea,+ and let the flying creatures become many in the earth.” 23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day. END 5 THE SIXTH CREATIVE DAY,,,, 24 Then God said: “Let the earth bring forth living creatures* according to their kinds, domestic animals and creeping animals* and wild animals of the earth according to their kinds.”+ And it was so. 25 And God went on to make the wild animals of the earth according to their kinds and the domestic animals according to their kinds and all the creeping animals of the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. 26 Then God said: “Let us+ make man in our image,+ according to our likeness,+ and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every creeping animal that is moving on the earth.”+ 27 And God went on to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him; male and female he created them.+ 28 Further, God blessed them, and God said to them: “Be fruitful and become many, fill the earth+ and subdue it,+ and have in subjection+ the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving on the earth.” 29 Then God said: “Here I have given to you every seed-bearing plant that is on the entire earth and every tree with seed-bearing fruit. Let them serve as food for you.+ 30 And to every wild animal of the earth and to every flying creature of the heavens and to everything moving on the earth in which there is life,* I have given all green vegetation for food.”+ And it was so. 31 After that God saw everything he had made, and look! it was very good.+ And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day. END 6

@@about2mount So 1 day for god could be thousands for us? On day one he creates the light, but doesn’t create the sun till day 4? So many thousands of years could have passed with there just being light but no light source? And he created the plants and trees on day 3 so again, how could the plants and trees survive for thousands of years with no sun?

@@Sbazz89 Ah, is the poor little pseudo-scientist mad? 😂

Carbon dating has limits. Now there are other methods for dating. You are right about the not/saving the dinosaurs. But, god turned them into fossils just after the "great flood". ... Case closed.

Hi, Jake. Every radiometric dating method has a maximum time limit you can date with it, hence, with carbon dating, you can't date fossils older than 55.000 - 60.000 years old, because you wouldn't have any C14 atoms left to measure the organism's age. Check the Half Life concept and in radiometric dating for more details.

Young earth creation is fantasy. Those 6 days of creation were long time periods not 24-hour days. The Hebrew word "YOM" for day also is also the same word for long periods of time and epochs and ages in ancient Hebrew.

@@jacobcherian4384 Yom in Biblical Hebrew does mean day, and a day in that sense is a new sun, or you have sunrise then sunset and with the new sunrise a new day. A day in Hebrew is יְוֹם a Year in Hebrew is שָׁנָה. Looking at the Hebrew Bible it uses day not year symbolism.

@@jacobcherian4384 God said there was evening and morning and said it was a new day. Where do you get that its not about a regular day?

Pretty much the same as it looks now

There was no flood that covered all of the land on earth and killed everything. Humanity is not incestuously descended from eight people on a boat a few thousand years ago.

She came along with godzilla.😄

+Gsquat Really? Where? "Please, don't be afraid to discuss the watchers, the nephilim, and their involvement in the cause for God to send the flood! It IS in Genesis. " You'll have to PROVE that to me . . . call me a skeptic if you want - BUT I suggest its JUST NOT THERE!!! God could ONLY find righteousness in Noah.

@@paulrobinson9318 I believe he was referring the evilness on the Earth at that time (?)

I Wonder why the Egyptian and Chinese civilizations didn’t even notice the flood.

@@davidgardner863 except for the ironic fact that both those cultures have their own flood story. Lol.

@@davidgardner863 Chinese version even states it was 8 people on the boat.

@@steakslapn9724 , Which is all the more evidence that The Bible story was copied from someone else.

@@davidgardner863 so, many cultures have historical tales of a great global flood, and you say the bibles claim to a flood is inaccurate because so many supporting stories exist all over the world. Funny. How is the existance of corroborating history accross multiple countries evidence the event never took place? Hahaha.

Jesus is not God try again

+@@HistoryandReviews STILL spreading your anti-Biblical false god lies everywhere? Come clean and be HONEST, you are a WATCHTOWER cultist aren't you?

When you get into the Old Hebrew of those verses, it gets more incredible to understand. The very first few words of Genesis 1 are truly awesome: In the beginning, God created.... (God=Hebrew word "elohim" is plural) (created = made from nothing-spoke into existance) Darkness- light and electrons did not exist yet Deep- the expanse of a yet created Universe Hovering over the waters- random matter spoke into existence from which all things would be organized into, down to the molecular level. God spoke it into ordered things, Evening and the Morning were the first DAY (Hebrew word= yom...ALWAYS a DAY...one cycle of the sun as the earth spins)

I doubt I would call 100 million or so few . . . While I have NO idea - the proliferation rate - there were CITIES within a couple hundred years or so of Adam and Eve - the Talmuds claim SHE alone had 53 children - and NO disease, long lifespans, etc - for 1600 years - that number may be very conservative. BUT I do NOT know not can it be proven .

+@@davidweeks3981 “Science spotlights three dimensions of nature that point to God. The first is the fact that nature obeys laws. The second is the dimension of life, of intelligently organized and purpose-driven beings, which arose from matter. The third is the very existence of nature. . . . “If you had an equation detailing the probability of something emerging from a vacuum, you would still have to ask why that equation applies. Hawking had, in fact, noted the need for a creative factor to breathe fire into the equations. . . . ” “we have all the evidence we need in our immediate experience and that only a deliberate refusal to “look” is responsible for atheism of any variety.” ― Antony Flew, There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind "

@@davidweeks3981 At the time of the flood, God said, "I will not contend with man forever. The years of a man's life shall be 120 years." Later, Solomon said observed that man only lives 70 years, 80 if he has the strength.

+@@davidweeks3981 YOUR kind of EVIDENCE to support YOUR fantasy. YOU rely on this but REJECT EVIDENCE? i.pinimg.com/originals/05/ff/f8/05fff8652134c0e938cd80a82d91af4e.jpg

Utter nonsense.

I don’t know about that dude, there’s proof otherwise.

+@@rubenthekid (Assuming you are responding to the VIDEO) Fine - then you can present it . . . "I don’t know about that dude, there’s proof otherwise." In fact there is NOT at all - Just because you were taught 50 years old guesses as fact in high school does NOT negate anything these SCIENTISTS say. There is NOT a shred of proof against what they are discussing. YOU ought NOT use the word 'PROOF' when talking about long ages and no flood - the EVIDENCE is mostly leaning towards the flood as they are discussing it. YOU cannot have 'proof' of what happened in the past without an eyewitness account - they have that - you do NOT! The EVIDENCE and the eyewitness account agree. Just got this in my emails today - maybe 20 of the "facts" you were taught that are totally false and anti-Scientific: creation.com/review-human-errors-nathan-lents NOT related to the flood facts I know - but just to prepare you for the many false mythologies you have been taught are facts.

+@@hansdemos6510 What have I missed? What has that to do with anything? And CLUE: The earth has NEVER been weighed. IT May have been assumed, or Calculated, but since LITTLE water or mineral has reached the earth since creation and NOTHING (much) has escaped - why are you mentioning this? "Ice VII is not heavy enough to account for the measured weight of the earth."

This is pure EDUCATION GOD HELP THE ATHEISTS LOVE IT AND THIS SCIENTIST

You don't listen very well he clearly said it rained more than 40 days and 40 nights that was just the beginning learn to listen before you speak!

@@joshsmith7176 so, they are not agree with the bible??? choking

They're insane.

They've already considered all your evidence, as I have, and realize how shallow it is.

@@nathanandnickSherbetImage what evidence is that then?

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ because even Darwin did the experiment and only one species of seed could live longer than 30 days. Nearly all could only live a week. Thus proving that this didn't happen at all. And half the world was in winter, so the plants were not seeding. plants are local; many plants live only in specific environments, cactuses, grasses etc. there is zero sign of a global plant-die off. none.

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ how do you know seeds last longer than that -- immersed in water? global flood, right?

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ all fossils are transitional forms, 100% of them. there is a definite change in life forms over time, and modern animals are not found with ancient ones. so he nature of things that live has changed dramatically over a long period of time. that is the observable fact. and evolution supports how that happened.

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ the rain forest of south americas. the black forest in germany. there is no coal there, and also no sign that all plants died off and were replaced. coal is found only in limited areas. there is no sign that only a few thousand years ago, just within recorded history, that all plants died off and grew back.

@Gek ⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ there is more evidence available for evolution than for the science that allowed understanding semiconductors to make your computer.

And Darwinist seem so intent on confirming Darwin's basic hypothesis that they will present their own creation myths as facts... and then express false sadness and genuine disgust towards anyone who doesn't buy what they are peddling.

2 “Why are you using your ignorance to deny my providence? 3 Now get ready to fight, for I am going to demand some answers from you, and you must reply. 4 “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Tell me, if you know so much. 5 Do you know how its dimensions were determined, and who did the surveying? 6-7 What supports its foundations, and who laid its cornerstone as the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy? 8-9 “Who decreed the boundaries of the seas when they gushed from the depths? Who clothed them with clouds and thick darkness 10 and barred them by limiting their shores, 11 and said, ‘Thus far and no farther shall you come, and here shall your proud waves stop’? 12 “Have you ever once commanded the morning to appear and caused the dawn to rise in the east? 13 Have you ever told the daylight to spread to the ends of the earth, to end the night’s wickedness? 14 Have you ever robed the dawn in red, 15 and disturbed the haunts of wicked men, and stopped the arm raised to strike? 16 “Have you explored the springs from which the seas come, or walked in the sources of their depths? 17-18 Has the location of the gates of death been revealed to you? Do you realize the extent of the earth? Tell me about it if you know! 19 Where does the light come from, and how do you get there? Or tell me about the darkness. Where does it come from? 20 Can you find its boundaries, or go to its source? 21 But of course you know all this! For you were born before it was all created, and you are so very experienced! 22-23 “Have you visited the treasuries of the snow, or seen where hail is made and stored? For I have reserved it for the time when I will need it in war. 24 Where is the path to the distribution point of light? Where is the home of the east wind? 25-27 Who dug the valleys for the torrents of rain? Who laid out the path for the lightning, causing the rain to fall upon the barren deserts, so that the parched and barren ground is satisfied with water and tender grass springs up? 28 “Has the rain a father? Where does dew come from? 29 Who is the mother of the ice and frost? 30 For the water changes and turns to ice as hard as rock. 31 “Can you hold back the stars? Can you restrain Orion or Pleiades? 32 Can you ensure the proper sequence of the seasons, or guide the constellation of the Bear with her satellites across the heavens? 33 Do you know the laws of the universe and how the heavens influence the earth? 34 Can you shout to the clouds and make it rain? 35 Can you make lightning appear and cause it to strike as you direct it? 36 “Who gives intuition and instinct?[a] 37-38 Who is wise enough to number all the clouds? Who can tilt the water jars of heaven, when everything is dust and clods? 39-40 Can you stalk prey like a lioness, to satisfy the young lions’ appetites as they lie in their dens or lie in wait in the jungle? 41 Who provides for the ravens when their young cry out to God as they try to struggle up from their nest in hunger?

Thats how some of the DNA got mixed with fish DNA.

Wrong...they have the same R1B1 base...Red headed Caucasians who were Hittites...Darn look at the language they wrote in....

LOL...not descended from but cousins to....

@@warrenclyde2467 Share a common ancestor.

We’re glad you’ve been enjoying our content! Many of the concerns you’ve brought up here _are_ addressed in the existing creationist literature. Unfortunately, they can be rather hard to find if you don’t already know where to look. First, I wanted to address your comment regarding “strict diluvial geology.” Terms like “diluvial geology” and “Flood geology” can be a little confusing because, in their strictest sense, they do not allow for the deposition of fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks beyond what happened during the Flood year. Some creationists do hold this position. However, the consensus among young-earth geologists is that the geologic record contains not only fossils and sediments produced by the Flood, but also those produced by processes acting after (and possibly before) the Flood. “I fail to see how fresh-water fish could have survived in reasonably salty water in one universal ocean. Are we willing to entertain the notion that current fresh-water fauna evolved form sea-water creatures immediately after the flood?” This question was addressed by Dr. Todd Wood (one of the scientists we interviewed in 𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺?) and Paul Garner in a recent episode of their podcast, 𝘓𝘦𝘵'𝘴 𝘛𝘢𝘭𝘬 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. Click the following link to see the appropriate clip of that episode: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d76Zn6R-rdO3fH0.html “Unless I'm misinformed, fossils of marsupials can be found only in areas where marsupials live today (South America, Australia and south eastern Asia. If marsupial fossils are pre-flood, how can we explain their descendants managed to move to an unrecognized, newly formed habitat that simply happened to be located just where their ancestors used to live in the pre-Noachian world?” Actually, this is one of the reasons most young-earth paleontologists think that the marsupial fossils are from _after_ the Flood. You can read more about this in the article listed here: www.zoocreation.com/the-flood-boundary-issue “The book of Genesis goes out of its way do describe the whereabouts of Eden. Claiming that post-flood people named post-flood rivers because they reminded them of other rivers that had existed in unknowable locations in the pre-flood world makes no sense. If that was the case, why would Genesis say that one of those rivers surrounded a certain territory where there is gold? The rivers mentioned seem to be the Tigris, the Euphrates, the Halys and the Aras or Araxes. If the garden of Eden had nothing whatsoever to do with these rivers, why bother mentioning them?” We cannot say with certainty why the names of several rivers and locations in the post-Flood world were recycled from pre-Flood place names, as the Bible does not give us this information. However, the practice of recycling place names is still common in recent times for a variety of reasons. A few examples include Bethlehem, North Carolina, Paris, Texas, and Mexico, Maine. Additionally, there are a number of good reasons to think that the modern-day place names you mentioned that are associated with the biblical Eden were subject to toponym-transfer. One of which is that they are irreconcilable with the geography of the Near East. Genesis records that a river flowed out of the Garden of Eden. However, there exists no single river from which the modern-day Tigris and Euphrates branch off. And while candidates exist for the identification of the Pishon and Gihon rivers as described in Genesis, their alleged modern-day counterparts have never been clearly located.

@@IsGenesisHistory Thanks for responding. As far as I know, the issue of the Edenic rivers and information regarding the abundance of gold in the pre-Flood land of Havilah is not satisfactorily addressed in creationist literature. If Genesis really implicitly poses a gargantuan rearrangement of the lithosphere across the globe, I completely fail to see how the geographical description of pre-Flood rivers, lands and specific mineral resources would be informative in any sense of the word. Such description would be pointless. Genesis would have been more coherent in that regard if it said something like "There were several rivers in and around Eden, and they traversed various lands with a lot of mineral resources". Anything further would be futile, as the readers could extract no information whatsoever from an irrelevant and yet reasonably detailed description. As for the problem of fresh-water biota in a world supposedly covered by a salty universal ocean for an extended period, admitting to the difficulty does not ameliorate the situation. Quite certainly, ad hoc explanations like saying the current fresh-water animals and plants simply "evolved" towards an intolerance to salinity that did not exist to such a degree in the pristine Earth sounds too much like evolutionist just-so stories. In my view, that's unacceptable. As for marsupial fossils being post-flood, I also find that notion quite suspect. If that were to be the case, how come the flood did not manage to leave us any remnants of drowned kangaroos or opossums, but later, lesser catastrophes achieved that very thing? Something similar could be said about "cavemen". As far as I know, all original entrances to Paleolithic caves were destroyed by water. If that is true, the widespread nature of this circumstance would strongly favour the idea of Palelolithic being pre-flood. However, if that is the case, how can the caves themselves contain fossils in their walls? I suppose it is precisely this type of thought that led the fathers of geology to posit the idea of successive creations and life-ending catastrophes, the last creation being the one described in Genesis and the last universal catastrophe being the one in Noah's days, but, alas, if that is the case, the majority of geological strata would predate Adam!

No. God destroyed essentially all evidence of humans during the flood. It wasn't just rain coming down from the sky but massive volcanoes and tsunamis like the world has never seen since. Not to mention the earthquakes and such that went along with that

@@jndvs95 lol.

@LanceHall Please see the following presentation on our channel where we address this claim: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oLVlZJqQrrm3e5s.html

In Genesis, God doesn't give all the details of every sin of that time but mentioned that the world was full of violence and humanities' hearts were bent on wickedness from birth. Now'adays God wants the gospel to reach everyone before He places His wrath on earth. Revelation describes His future wrath.

Nevermind, they don't know.

Animals are only preserved as fossils they were buried quickly. Humans were probably the last to die and would have decomposed. Fossils found are only a minuscule of evidence of life lost.

@@masada2828 I'm pretty confident that humans weren't the last to die. And there would be millions scattered around just like the dinosaurs. But magically fossils are always found groups and never spread across acres of land as if put there by water rolling waters. And never with human skeletons mixed up within them which is odd.

@@edgarpoe6966 Yes id have to agree. Water is the most powerfull product on earth. A flood doesn't discriminate between animals and humans. A flood will take anything and everything and mix it like a margarita. It has no intentions on giving anything back. With that kind of devastation there would be, no picking up the dead, no hiding, just alot of swimming🇺🇸

GOD is a Spirit, all flesh is grass, all, all yes all men are liars. It matters not what we think or believe about the Flood, All That really matters is that All sin is covered by sweet Jesus' Blood! Sinners killed Him, but He turned The Other Cheek! Our Redeemer liveth!

I think you meant "It didn't." Come on, you want to us to consider your opinion at least be serious about your spelling. You move on.

The science programs of all the universities are created for fools, imbeciles and idiots.

@@WhirledPublishing and you are using tools from science everydays (electricity, internet in this case)

​@@olivierb9716 You're confusing geologists - whose shockingly low IQ's are uploaded - online - by Psychologists - with high IQ entrepreneurs and inventors - they are two very different groups: Geologists have 85 to 115 IQ's which are, at best, the intellectual equivalent of the smart kids in fifth and sixth grades while high IQ inventors and entrepreneurs tend to be over 150. To imagine they're the same intellectual group is to believe average school children have the intelligence of brilliant inventors. Now would be a good time to stop imagining you're one of the smart ones - since you have absolutely no accomplishments in life that would corroborate that delusion.