alot harder whan 34k soldirers withou ammo facing 180,000mukti bahini and 250,000 soldiers of indian army

​@@bhattibrothers7053source pakistani media😂

⁠@@bhattibrothers7053 but aren’t one of you supposed to be equal the martial powers of 100 kafirs? How did you surrender? Is the story of your racial/genetic superiority a lie? After all, you are the ones who bent to the foreign religion and powers instead of living proud like the indigenous people.

@@racecar15 source lots of them just search them I believe there were atleast 3 division which would equate to 34 or 40k soldiers without tanks and ammo depleted due to war with mukti bahini and remember india closed its airspace the rest were razakars,police and paramilitary

@@rajath275 no we are never equal to 100 kafirs it is God who gives us power and strength and victory remember battle of uhud muslims were defeated why? Because they disobeyed prophet muhammad.Same case here we fought our brothers and killed them and india took advantage

Sorry to hear your parents had to deal with that

Violence against Hindus common? Beta pagol naki? Bangladesh e hindo der jeirokom facility dewa hoy Asia te onno kono minority ke dewa hoy kina giye khoj kor. Amader desher hindora valoi ase, amader thekeo valo. Tarporo toh Tara desher birudhe baire nalish kore jemon korsilo Priya Saha. Leftist naki?

Wow an amazing story, this is what should be shown to the world

hope Bangladesh would become a more peaceful country after that, but it seems Islamists are on the rise.

That's an impressive story. Salute 🫡

Good news, some local collaborators were tried and hanged for their crimes.

@@plasticide4095when?

@@Newdivide Qader Molla in 2011 and a few others alongside him as far as I know, it was a huge deal in here, and it caused violent protests from Islamist groups

@@plasticide4095 good they got what's coming

The biggest Genocide Did by Pakistani army was Operating Searchlight. Google Operation Searchlight..It was the biggest Genocide Did by the army to its own people at that time.

Funny thing is that the push for an muslim Indian nation was spearheaded by people who later formed Bangladesh. Meaning the original leaders of Pakistan abandoned it as a failed project. Even the Jinnah wasn't a Punjabi

Pakistani Punjabis are still doing the same to other Pakistanis till date

And they blame india for terrorism in kashmir when they invaded kashmir themselves that they joined India.

@@stevej71393 read the oc's second sentence until it hits you.

@@AntiAnglo-Saxon Anglo Saxon is a link to main land Europe ,thats all .Most Brits are pigmy whites .

Brother I'm not having any fun with this fact. :) The problem is that this military with a country attached to it, is constantly on the lookout for a way to blame India for the problems they have created for themselves. Any time their economic situation starts getting precarious they start rattling their sabres. And the worst part is these dumbasses have nukes, the password to fire them is most likely 1234, and the moment some renegade captain gets his hands on the controls he will get bright ideas of destroying India and getting promoted to general. This gives me sleepless nights.

True. And very telling point about the nature of PAK society.

Even the current prime minister was kicked out and when he raised voice he was shot

Right

Zardari? forgot him?

im ready for the dumpster fire, my popcorn is ready

Scary they have weapons of mass destruction

i have chicken nuggies

@@stc3145 and we never used them unlike 'murica

@@surajkishan3837 Do you know why the Americans used them? Or is your country too poor to offer history education?

That is because India accepted that courting.They were a socialist country until the 90s.

India leaned toward the USSR as a response to its economic and political position when it gaining independence from the British. Whether due to actual ill-intent or natural market forces, India suffered series of de-industrialization leading up to independence. So although seemingly democratic and officially part of the so-called Non Aligned Movement (initiated by Indian Prime Minister Nehru in 1961 at Belgrade, Yugoslavia) during the Cold War, India incorporated socialist mixed-market economic policies in an effort to build up the nation. Which is why India established strategic, military and trade ties to the USSR, especially during Khrushchev's de-Stalinist reform period who was eager to keep India in a so-called non-aligned status. Pakistan and the U.S. forged stronger ties due to the geo-political leanings of the ruling Pakistan class and their shared interest against the USSR and Communism. Of course I am simplifying a bit of what happened, but it's a start.

It was the reverse, Our PM first visited US for support but since Nixon and Kissinger were racist pieces of shit we had to resort to USSR help

Allying with America meant aligning with the British, who you'll remember, had just finished some of the worst atrocities in Indian History, and only left when they realized they were facing an outnumbered land war right after a world war. It's natural to side with the enemy of your enemy, especially since the USSR had an openly anti-colonial stance. Siding with Pakistan was a mistake, of course. The whole "war on terror" (truly just new age colonialism) was, as was the cold war in general.

​@@RobinTheBot what's your screen time on KZfaq. You have so many subscriptions.

Don't forget the constant threats of nuclear war even when they only have cold-war era missiles, no second strike capabilities and the strategic depth of wet cardboard while the other side has an ABM net up and running for major cities

The next episode in this series comes up in 28 years with the Kargil conflict

The reason is that Pakistan is run by the intelligence services and unelected government. Usually known as the deep state. They had one long before America was taken over by its own version. Yes, the deep state will make decisions that are in its own interest while being solidly against the interests of its nation and people. That's why they're so harmful.

sounds like the Gasa Strip & hesboloa ?

💯

I have heard of such stories.Kindly bring peace soon.Anyone can contact me.

Thank you for sharing your story. It was very emotional to read. I thank your great grandfather for his service to the humanity.

Great story... Glory to your grandfather

He needs to be popularized

Amazing. Salute to your Frand Father

It should be “atrocities” not “authorities”.

Bangladesh created its own problems. First it demanded separate land for Muslims, a land to rule over and make non-muslims as dhimmis. Everything was going find and their cumulative hatred for Hindus kept them united, until the elections. Once the election results showcased that Bengalis will lead the new Pakistan, the punjabis and pathans looked down upon dirt dark bengalis, often equated as kafirs due to their affinity for a language local to the land (Bangla). They paid for their own sins, but again the Hindus suffered and 7million , mostly Hindus left East Pakistan. India had no other option that to intervene. Bangaldesis may easily absolve of themsleves and paint themselves as victim, but what unites Bangaldeshis and Pakistanis (the islamic mindset of bromance), is hatred of Hindus!

"On 13 December 1971 I gave the final orders of 'Last man-last round' which was virtually an order to die. No officer or man hesitated and the response was in the affirmative. These orders had to be changed to 'Surrender' on the orders of the President of Pakistan [Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan] advised by General Hameed [Abdul Hamid Khan] and persuaded by Dr Malik [Abdul Motaleb Malik], the Governor who told me that delay in surrender would cause difficulties in holding operations in West Pakistan. They wanted to cease hostilities in West Pakistan at all cost. The panic and stress was so great that the Govt. was hysterical to shed East Pakistan and save West Pakistan. So to save West Pakistan, our base, from disintegration and Western Garrison from further repulses I staked my reputation, my brilliant career, and the high traditions of Pakistan Army and agreed with a heavy heart to lay down arms when we were nowhere near defeat and tactically better placed than Indians at that particular time. More or less the same thing happened with the Japanese Forces deployed in the Pacific in World War II, who had about fifty-eight Army Divisions with sufficient aerial and naval support and tactically and strategically were in a better position than the Allies. The use of atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced the Japanese Pacific Forces to surrender unconditionally in order to save their motherland from further destruction." ~ Lt. Gen. A. A. K. Niazi, Lieutenant General Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi, Last Governor of East Pakistan

​@@StreetDrilla lol

@@StreetDrilla niazi was coping from defeat here, also him using the example of the ww2 is hilarious because its a known fact that the americans had the japanese beat, and those 58 divisions had nowhere near as much oil to fight the americans anymore. Niazi ignores historical accuracy in order to downplay pakistani atrocities, and makes the defeat seem less humiliating

Let's not mince words - 24 years of Pakistani administrative incompetence, inhumanity and militaristic bloodlust caused this. And they still teach themselves that they won this war in their history books.

​@@krityaan Well history books of every country are made of lies.

@@krityaan I was not talking about the reasons that led to this war. I was talking about the issue with handling POWs.

Bangladeshi. That's like the basics of conduct with Prisoners of War. Even the Nazis provided this much to the PoW they weren't exterminating. Or would you rather preach extermination?

​@@alihasanabdullah7586 yeah considering of what happened in the eastern front and east Pakistan, paxtanis were lucky that they didn't get captured by the mukti bahini.

It's against western narrative they won't show it

I wish USA would hv involved. That would hv made world diff what we know.. interesting world when china+india+russia would clearly compete with USA and its ally

@@vir1great u were involved, u were equally part of Bangladeshi genocide

​@@vir1greatchina was usa ally back then.. Just around that time they fought a war as well with russia.. search sino-soviet split.

@@vir1great your wishing does not changes the history. USA, back then, had sent its 7th fleet just to terrorize india. Britain had also done the same by sending its HMS (i cant remember its name) . Also, is it not good to compete?? every developing nation aims to become a developed nation like USA, France, or UK. Why does it bother you so much?

When tf did Pakistan have democracy? Literally none of the "elected" PMs have escaped being overthrown/impeached/murdered and/or couped. Heck even when wikileaks happened, the pakistani president was caught begging foreign governments to rescue him from upcoming assassination lol

Took you long enough, lol. Wonder how long before you realize how your ancestors were converted by the sword. I'd say at least 500 more years of being utterly outclassed by India ought to do it.

Then all pakistanis should be thankful to indians, as it was India who showed The actual value of pakistani life towards pakistani army/government

It only took you 50+ years to realize that

@@eee9034 To be grateful to the Indians is a bit of a stretch. Hindsight never truly changes things and by all intents and purposes - while India did the right moral thing to support Bangladesh, it still is technically part of Pakistan and as part of joining the UN is to sign the declaration of non-intervention into the internal affairs of other sovereign members. Pakistan had every right to declare the war but if one had to be grateful to someone, it was that the war ended so quickly and decisively. People never should be grateful to receive violence but lessons can be learned.

Can you Provide a source for the carrier group having orders to attack. It´s well documented that the US armed parkistan in the relevant period directly and through allies. It does not seem out of character for to the United states to intervene directly, I however never found a reliable authority to show that such orders existed.

@@CEOofCulturalMarxismhe US and supposedly the UK had carrier groups in the Bay of Bengal - which the Soviets also supposedly sent two groups to tail. I don’t know if kg14 is saying that they were sent to attack or sent to the area to be able to attack but there are no records that they ever were directly involved in the conflict. Ultimately, they were there as a show of force/capability because of American concern of growing Indian influence in the region. Remember again that the US thought the Soviets had a secret alliance with India and India was effectively gaining control of Bangladesh in the conflict - taking place at the same time as Soviet Containment and Nixon’s reapproachment with China.

​@@tictacdude3468 So by trying to pressure India into not being friendly with (or at least as influential and tied to) the USSR, the US pushed India into openly siding with the USSR?

@@CEOofCulturalMarxism @thejudeobolshevik6406 You are right, there are no concrete sources that the carrier groups had explicit orders to attack (Will have to probably wait multiple decades for that to get declassified). But the intent to support Pakistan was there. US was already arming Pakistan even after an arms embargo due to the genocide. Had the war not ended as quickly as it did, there were high chances of US intervention or even Chinese as Nixon was also encouraging the Chinese to intervene militarily.

@@eldorados_lost_searcher Don’t know for sure, that’s something to ask a historian who studies that era/conflict.

Nah let him cook

Even today, Imran Khan the last PM and the opposition leader of pakistan was literally kidnapped and dragged from his house by military police. Supreme court intervened then only he was released after a week, just cause he spoke against the constant threat of Pakistani Army. And even today his supporters and other leaders are being charged in military courts. Yet the US keeps supplying the Pakistan Army with fresh F16 spares to fight "terrorism"😂

"On 13 December 1971 I gave the final orders of 'Last man-last round' which was virtually an order to die. No officer or man hesitated and the response was in the affirmative. These orders had to be changed to 'Surrender' on the orders of the President of Pakistan [Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan] advised by General Hameed [Abdul Hamid Khan] and persuaded by Dr Malik [Abdul Motaleb Malik], the Governor who told me that delay in surrender would cause difficulties in holding operations in West Pakistan. They wanted to cease hostilities in West Pakistan at all cost. The panic and stress was so great that the Govt. was hysterical to shed East Pakistan and save West Pakistan. So to save West Pakistan, our base, from disintegration and Western Garrison from further repulses I staked my reputation, my brilliant career, and the high traditions of Pakistan Army and agreed with a heavy heart to lay down arms when we were nowhere near defeat and tactically better placed than Indians at that particular time. More or less the same thing happened with the Japanese Forces deployed in the Pacific in World War II, who had about fifty-eight Army Divisions with sufficient aerial and naval support and tactically and strategically were in a better position than the Allies. The use of atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki forced the Japanese Pacific Forces to surrender unconditionally in order to save their motherland from further destruction." ~ Lt. Gen. A. A. K. Niazi, Lieutenant General Amir Abdullah Khan Niazi, Last Governor of East Pakistan

​​@StreetDrilla yeah he is the same guy who used to cry like a girl the moment he got the news that the Indian advance towards Dhaka was coming for him and his 93000 men...you should be ashamed of yourself and your army to even think that an army that was gleefully conducting the genocide and rape of unarmed men women and children in Bangladesh was a moral and noble army. To insinuate that they were in better tactical position than the Indians even after being surrounded on all sides and 93000 of his troops surrendered for a noble cause..what a joke..pakistan during the 1965 war when India was close to Lahore ran to their masters in the white House begging for a ceasefire ..you know what the Americans told them ..they bluntly told them that the Indians got you by the throat .all that i mentioned is not some top secret but publicly available information...but you Pakistani clowns still celebrate your humiliating defeat in 1965 as defence day ...well to emphasize how deceitful and dishonest your phony army is to its own citizens here is one small anecdote...the day before pakistan surrendered in Bangladesh the headlines in your national newspapers read...pak fauj is on the charge and this time it is going for complete victory...thousands of Indian troops and their Bengali collaborators lose their lives in combat...and the very next day they surrendered like the cowards they are...No general in human history has given up a better tactical position let alone surrender just because he was questioning his conscience and morality...but you clowns to this day believe all the lies and misinformation your millitary keeps feeding you after every debacle they suffer at the hands of India..what has your army done for you since the day you gained indepence in 1947anyways....lost half of your country just 25 years into its existence, dictatorial generals,coups,martial law,political instability and anarchy ,defeat after defeat in every war it started without any provocation from the Indian side,terrorism along the Afghan border and inside your major cities perpetrated by groups that were trained and equipped by your own army,bombed its own people in nwfp and Waziristan,allowed a foreign country to use its territory to attack its own people, seccesionist groups like bla in Balochistan that came into existence due to the brutal persecution of balochis that was perpetrated by your army.,record numbers of trips to the imf china,Saudi Arabia,uae,america ,sco aiib with a begging bowl you call kashkol to beg for money. They have made the same people they were supposed to protect to suffer this cycle of unending humiliation and shame and for what... just because your corrupt Army wants to stay on par with India militarily despite the fact that Indian economy is the fourth largest economy of the world and your economy has been in tatters for the last 25 years to the point that you need to beg for basic food items like rice and wheat..your army promotes and protects it's financial interests by defending Chinese financed vanity projects that are being build by taking loans from the Chinese that come with huge interest rates making your country sink into a debt trap that is of its own making,...I mean the only purpose of an army in a democracy is to maintain the sanctity of its borders but your army failed miserably in the one job they were being paid for the day they surrendered half of your country and population to the Indians in record numbers without even putting up a fight... Let me make it perfectly clear to you fools that all India needs to keep your economy in a constant state of unending downfall is build weapons they can afford and sit down to watch your army try to match India's defence spending something that your country cannot afford...other then that what threat does India pose to you clowns when it was your army that forced India's hand by dragging it into wars that were initiated by them in the first place...India has nothing to gain by occupying any part of your country . This threat that stays ever present in every Pakistanis mind is the result of the fear mongering your army employs to keep justifying the insane defence spending of your country that is then utilised by corrupt generals in escaping your banana republic and leaving it to its own devices by shamelessly migrating to america and Europe ,sending their kids to ivy league foreign institutions and buying pizza chains like papa Johns.. In our country even the highest ranked generals are considered lucky if they somehow manage to save enough money after retirement so that they can build a house of their own let alone migrating to first world countries for better opportunities something your generals are guilty of.I mean had the people of your country forced your governments to cut the mindless defence spending your army was involved in the very day your country successfully tested its nuclear device trust me your country would have been on a completely different trajectory of growth and development than what it finds itself on right now. A country having nuclear weapons in its arsenal means deterrence and if by some misfortune things spiral into complete chaos it means mutually assured destruction. So why does your every govt keep increasing your defence budget when India has no reason to attack your hellhole of a country. Trust me we have better things to do rather than dragging our military into a never ending regional conflict that is a huge drain on the economy and resources of both the parties involved . The only reason we have to maintain such a large military presence on our borders is number one the Chinese who have made their imperialistic intentions clear by trying to creep into and occupy specific strategically placed tactical points on our side of the lac by deploying 50000 troops supported by their artillery,mechanized forces,rocket force,air force and air defence systems on their side of the border. The second reason is the countless terror groups like jamat e islami,lashkar e jhangvi,jaish e Mohammad,lashkar e toiba, Indian Mujahideen,hizbul Mujahideen flourishing on your side of the line of control... Your cowardly army that is shit scared of engaging in a direct confrontation with the highly motivated Indian troops keeps using the above mentioned groups as proxies in their fight against our armed forces by offering those piss poor,brainwashed wannabe jihadis bundles of cash ,equipping them with automatic weapons and helping them to infiltrate into Kashmir by providing them with cover fire so that if they somehow succeed in getting inside our border without getting their brains blown out by Indian snipers can keep killing our armed forces and innocent civilians. But unfortunately for you and your army what ends up happening after all this mindless wastage of your hard earned money your army is constantly involved in is that the moment those terrorists enter our borders with nefarious designs they are hunted down and sent straight to the 72 hoors that await them in heaven courtesy our ever present and ever vigilant armed forces.Till the day you disband these countless terror groups voluntarily nothing is going to change for the citizens of your country ..on the contrary your condition will just keep on worsening day after day ,year after year ultimately spiralling down into an unending cycle of chaos,violence,bloodshed and anarchy...attributes that will one day result in your country being declared a failed state and trust me right now you people are at the deep end of that spiral with not a single conscientious soul in your government and army interested in and capable of stopping your decline into the depths of eternal doom and complete annihilation that is rubbing it's hands in excitement desperately waiting for your now foretold arrival. If any one of you cowards still believe in the concept of jihad and ghazwa e hind perpetrated by your resident lunatic defence experts like the great Mr. Zahil Hamid and the unabashedly suave and swashbuckling Mr.orya maqbool jaan then let me warn you that it's not the 72 hoors those two keep telling you about who are desperately waiting for you in heaven but what really awaits to welcome you at the gates of hellfire is the devil's minions who are experts in every torture tactic you can think of like,boiling alive in burning hot oil,drawing and quartering and then feeding your intestines to you keeping you conscious as it progresses so that you can not just see yourself getting mercilessly butchered but can also feel every second of the pain that accompanies such unspeakable and inhumane methods of torture.

The answer to all WHY for every Indo Pak war is Pakistani generals wanted to write cheques their country couldn't cash out

@@hiteshadhikariNo it is the answer to every war in general someone gets too greedy or too big for their britches and makes a mistake that forces them to be taken down a few pegs. More specifically, I feel the Operations Room summed it up nicely that Bangladesh didn’t want to be part of Pakistan anymore and the Indian government was for Bangladesh independence because any chance to undermine their enemy was a chance they needed to take.

​@@hiteshadhikarithat's a very India centric take and that's coming from a Bangladeshi. Both of the armies and politicians of both countries are extremely trigger happy and extremely racist towards the other country. Do not blame only Pakistan when India has equal blame in everything.

@@jadeidkabir5395 buddy, u got independence thanks to India 2nd remind me when india started any war? Oh you cant 🙂

@@emberfist8347 another major factor was the millions fleeing into india and the migration crisis India already has enough people Also the hindus in Bangladesh were being massacred by Pakistani army, this also pushed us into war

As the video said, it's cheaper for Indira Gandhi to go outright to war than to feed millions of refugee.

Not to mention psychologically as well. In 60's and 70's, they actually had a doctrine that stated that only muslims deserved to rule the Indian subcontinent, and Hindus around the subcontinent must be subjugated and converted, as part of their 1,000 year old jihad called 'Ghazwa-e-Hind'. During 65 & 71, they even managed to fool their population by proclaiming that ''1 muslim man equals 10 infidel hindus'. Imagine the humiliation they went through after this war, because of which, they later realized that its impossible to defeat India militarily, so they must adopt guerilla tactics, which they called 'death by thousand cuts'. As part of this, they would overwhelm India through 1000s of terror attacks, which they believed would soften the ground for an actual invasion.

@@rajasmr156 Correction : terror tactics. Not guerilla tactics. Never guerilla tactics.

​@@rajasmr156🤣🤣 they used to think superior pathans can push back indian army. The indian army showed them their place

You make it seem like india intervening was bad, lots more people would have died in the atrocities if india didnt intervene, also the influx of refugees from east pakistan strained india's fragile economy ( a piece of information u seem to ignore)

It was not just language, it was about ethnicity too, Punjabi Pakistani vs Bengali Bangladeshis.

The artocrities that had been done by Pakistani army is hard to imagine, whenever I hear the stories of East Pakistan I got goosebumps and tears.

Disasters happen , atleast some people are brave enough to acknowledge it

90% of r$ pe victims were Hindu women and perpetrators were muslim men

Лучший способ управлять людьми - это стравить их друг с другом по религиозному или национальному признаку. Чтобы они не могли изменить ничего в политическом и экономическом строе. Для усиления власти капитала. Именно так и происходит в Индии.

I think that's largely because it doesn't fit nearly in with many of the other conflicts of the era as it was other ethnic difference and had little to do with either communism or the eastern block.

​@@nicholastreat6720 The US 7th fleet was deployed in support of Pakistan and the Soviets responded in kind. The war ended before either player could arrive. This was absolutely a Cold War conflict.

@@krityaan I'm not saying that the great powers of the time didn't have interest in either country, just that it wasn't over political systems.

Hopefully the US politicians can come to their senses and stop supporting Pakistan. Supporting India would be preferable, but staying neutral would be the most viable option. This coming from an American. India would be a vital ally, and it's a shame that the US and India have relatively poor diplomatic relations.

I will be willing to see the US in a new light if their media stops portraying Porkistanis as the victim.

​@@Igzileesometimes USA gives reasons to hate them. USA gave 8 F16 jets to Pakistan which missiles and it's gear. Everyone knows they'll use it against India

I don't think we do that anymore

​@@Igzilee Since Trump came to power a lot of funding towards pakistan was stopped.

We know. Comment this on a video that doesn’t cover the *lead-up* but the *war itself*

As an American, I've always been curious as to why we support(ed) Pakistan instead of India, especially when India seems more democratic. The more I've learned recently, the more idiotic the decision seems to me. Unfortunately it seems based off of suspicions that due to the alliance with the Soviets that India would also become a communist nation. This taking place in a period of deep anti-communism sentiments in the US. Hopefully our politicians can come to their senses. India would be a powerful ally, not only in hopefully softening up tensions in southeast Asia but also helping to counter China's recent aggression

Don't care

​@@IgzileeUS supported Pakistan because of its geography. It wanted to use Pakistan to control the expansion of Russian influence in Afghanistan.

Igzilee because the US is run by elites your presidents and politicians are all puppets at best

Yes my friend it's very very terrible , the Pak army soldiers did every kind of torture known to human with d bengali people, kidnapping raping murder, the infamous chuknagar ganahatya.

I know.. their scorched earth policy for ethnic cleansing of Hindus brought hell on so many people.. i have heard so many stories from our grandparents and their friends.. almost every family lost someone or other.. smae happened on the western side as well.. so many families had to suffer the ruthlessness..

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8lmfppjrLKRj4U.htmlsi=Eck8lVGmOucH7Z3U The Bangladesh Liberation War Of 1971

​​​@@babutara7374 Ну нет, конечно. Немцы были более изобретательны. Они смогли использовать евреев для удобрения полей с картошкой. Европейцы всегда были более современны в методах геноцида! Первые концлагеря придумали именно власти Англии, для буров в Африке.

@@kotnapromke I don't know Russian, I don't understand your language.

U must be joking right

Yes, it’s a joke

They create problem in Arunachal too, calling themselves as Assamese 🤦🏿

Same here in our Meghalaya state

Main rain is ourselves

And Your indian army surrender in aksai chin 1962 and 2020 surrender in galwan and 2023 surrender tawang against china

And Your indian army surrender in aksai chin 1962 and 2020 surrender in galwan and 2023 surrender tawang against china

@@khalistanifreedomfighter3056 Average Pakistani

khalistan taking side of pakistan, i knew it, pakistan is the father of khalistan, too bad both dad-son are in shambles right now XD@@khalistanifreedomfighter3056

​@@khalistanifreedomfighter3056average Canadian terrorist and immigrant

Actually he's 1st and more popular than Mujibur Rehman.

@@raisul_raj actually you are right. Shaheed President Ziaur Rahman beshi popular chilo

​@@sebresludolf9611 জি কারণ জিয়ার জন্য এখনও আমি লোকদের আক্ষেপ করতে দেখি এবং অনেক কে কাদতে ও দেখেছি। কিন্তু একই কথা মুজিব কে নিয়ে বলা যায় না।

@@raisul_raj এর কারণ বর্তমান সরকারের দূর্ণীতি আর ভ*রতপ্রীতি, আর শেখ মুজিবের বাকশাল। অন্যদিকে জিয়াউর রহমান ছিলেন সত্যিকারের দেশপ্রেমিক নেতা।

@@sebresludolf9611 i am an indian and i have heard about this legend, can you tell some more, how did he managed bangladesh after independence?

Post WW2 history is very Cold War focused

@@counterfit5 There was a Cold War angle to this - The US sent in a carrier group to assist on the side of Pakistan (I think the UK too was planning something similar), but Soviet subs in the Indian Ocean surfaced as a warning, and the US backed off. So... it really could've been something.

The reason is primarily that the US doesn't like to point out that it supported genocidal dictators. Even though most of the people the US was working with throughout the cold war were horrific dictators. Fulgencio Batista, Augusto Pinochet, the Shah of Iran, the dictator of South Korea, the guy in charge of south Vietnam, the government of Pakistan that was and still is always one step away from being couped by their army, the list is practically endless. Everyone the US supported or allied with has been as bad or worse than, the Soviet union.

@xmlthegreat lol just because you don't know about them doesn't mean they're better.

@@mjanny6330 did I say better? Learn to read. I said worse. It's degrees of assholes. It's assholes all the way down. The americans love to pretend "freedom" and "democracy" won while they were inventing using helicopters to kidnap and throw dissidents to their deaths. From MACV-SOG to Pinochet's cultist torture camps.

Did you watch the video carefully?

​@@TheIntelReportwe all know how Pakistan got the nuclear weapon.

Pakistan vassal state of US Indian vassal state of USSR. It's typical geopolitics game

@@skylinelover9276 India was never a vassal state, infact India was one of the founding members of non-aligned movement

@@yashasvisingh6694 yes but it's secretly controled by USSR.. because India is not yet economically powerhouse Before

It must've been hard for him knowing that he will be executed without any mercy for treason but still fought for his motherland.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d8lmfppjrLKRj4U.htmlsi=Eck8lVGmOucH7Z3U The Bangladesh Liberation War Of 1971

Мне больше нравятся партизаны наскалиты. Вот кто действительно герой.

And then you wake up. Because your sources are :timesofindia/zee news etc.

Kashmiris/ khalistanis assamis etc and all non hindus who eat meat.

​@@fattiesunite2288come out of pakistani madrasas

@@fattiesunite2288 so what if they eat mean?

I second the motion. Coverage of Kohima and Imphal would be very welcome.

World War 2 in real time (aka the Time Ghost Army) does a wonderful job of outlining the campaign in Kohima and Impala. It really kicks off in 1943-44.

@Jeff Coghill yeah I watched, but they don't do the battle maps on a granular scale like The Operations Room.

@@markstott6689 true dat. But, if you watch both, you get 2 really good sources of the operational theatre. I can’t seem to get enough of either channel.

@@cogman62 That's fair 😊😊😊

The Maharaja's were in control of alot of day to day issues and only really declined in 1858. In reality, the Mughals should have resumed rule over their territories in 47.

mughals were nothing when britishers took power in india at that time biggest powerful empire was maratha empire which was running on Confederacy and eventually fight broke out between maratha chiefs for superiority and british took advantage of that and took control of india and mughals were only limited to delhi at that time and they were themselves vessel state for maratha empire

​@@aragonchi4191last Mughal ruler ruled over a street in Delhi. Marathas and others had dealt enough blows. If it wasnt for British who planted congress leaders like nehru and Gandhi to pacify large section of Hindus the geographical boundaries and demographics would have been completely different today. Well 70 yrs is not too long for civilizations. This will be corrected.

They were expecting full on reprisals post independence from the Indian religions. None of that really materialized though.

How did Muslim dynasties rule as a minority over a majority? And why does PM India bow to red fort built by Islam on Independence Day. Seethe harder

@@syedahmed8650 Nobody "bows" to red fort here in india. We have wonders of modern world like the space program to admire.

@@mdjawaideqbal2941 Your Prime minister does every 15 Aug and cries about 1000 years of slavery. Check his speech. He hates people with your name

@@syedahmed8650 its an old custom and he does not bow, indian flag proudly put on the red fort and it waves showing our struggles and success and also, it was built by hindus only, the architecture was islamic but workers, material and major planning was done by hindus only

Well In Bangladesh there many fans of Brazils Football team.

@@foxtrot5850 Thank you sir.

@@foxtrot5850 Pakistan and India have good cricket players.

💀

Noncredible defense!

It is weird isn't it how the Vietnam war was such a big deal that they have tons of content but the liberation war s almost non existent

Why thank him he is calling it India pakistan war it is the Bangladeshi war of independence.

@@addyred1861 Agreed our intervention is barely mentioned

Fuck those 2 assholes, they're no better than Russia and Ukraine

Ah! Internet, what an unpredictable place it is. All the deplorable shit I see on here are all worth it for moments/comments like these. Hopefully the India that has remained will prove itself worthy to you and give people across the globe hope that a civilisation as diverse as ours can survive and thrive as Democratic nation state.

I'm not supporting the partition, but unfortunately it seems there weren't many other options. A region as diverse as India would have likely struggled under a single government as shown in the conflicts between difference cultures and religions, and splitting up the region even further would have probably caused more chaos. From my perspective, it was about the only option Britain had at the time other than A.) Leaving the country in anarchy or B.) Keeping control of India.

Nice idea

siege and fall of skardu as well.

In the Ops Room. We didn't give you the key.

WHERE'S YOUR VIDEO?! YOU'D NEVER GIVE IT TO AN ORDINARY CITIZEN!

Stop uttering cr..p war ended with surrender of pakistan to joint command. U should've commented on how he is calling it indopak war not bangladesh war of independence. BTW I m not denying mujib was essential for our independence struggle.

​@@addyred1861থাপরাইয়া দাঁত ফেলাইয়া দিমু। তুই মিরপুরের যুদ্ধের কথা জানিসনা? নাকি তুই কলকাতার দাদা? If you from india then a big F U coz this ain't about you so f-off. The country ain't fully liberated even if a small part of it has hostile forces in it. That includes biharis, rajakars, and pakistani soldiers in civilian clothing. Mirpur wasn't liberated until 1972. That is what I was talking about. Read about it you pr*ck.

Well, this video isn't focused on the Bangladeshi independence movement. It's focused on the war between India and Pakistan that on paper started on Dec 3, 1971 and ended on Dec 16, 1971 which India still celebrates as Vijay Diwas (Victory Day).

Excellent comment

Another piece of excellent decolonisation and nation building by the British. Drawing lines on inaccurate maps in London worked so well. Did the same in the middle east and that's been no trouble at all😢

@@Anmeteor9663 I'm sorry you seemed to have had two problems here. You watched a different video, and you've allowed yourself to be taught by lying Liberals. You gave yourself away by mentioning London by the way. That political bubble is the next line that should be drawn. London acts like it's a totally separate country, and does nothing to reflect the United Kingdom at all. If anything, it does nothing but hurt our country, and those who speak like you, need to travel more. Born in Manchester, lived in London, travelled to India. I assure you that what you think you know, is in fact bull. Take your pick from these two options..... 1) No independence for India or 2) Civil war (because that was what this really was) that always happens when a power vacuum exists, after a major power leaves any situation. Are you going to blame Britain for Hong Kong too? You'd think you would stfu when you have a video full of facts to watch. It's more likely you didn't actually watch it all, and just trolled the comments. Nick Meteor? Your world is fantasy.

@@dragonstormdipro1013 Thank you. I'm so annoyed that i was misled for so long. Bangladesh has horrible circumstances, but the people there live free, by their own choice. I know that's easy to say for me, but given the attitude of the west to power right now, I'm not sure that we live as freely as we think, and faced with any sort of similar situation, I'm not sure we would fight at all. Today, people don't stand together. They are all about themselves, so when I get a comment like yours, I'm so glad to find people still think alike. Faith in humanity restored. Oh wait, I just read Nick Meteor's comment 🙈 He'll tell me that Britain created forced slaves next. Only African tribal leaders created slaves, not any white man. People bought slaves when it was legal to, and I'm pretty sure the British Empire did not exist at the time slavery first became in human history. We did stop the trade and it cost us 70 years of money. We also fought alone twice in World Wars until backup arrived (we paid for every bullet the U.S gave us) The total cost of those two world wars was equal to every penny gained in Empire. So you could look at it like this. The British Empire spent every last penny to save the world, whilst the United States was getting it's big boy pants on. You're welcome 👍🏻 I will take the hit on exchanging tea for opium in China though, and then threatening invasion if the trade didn't continue. That was a shitty call in any history.

I think people tend to blame common people of a country for the wrongdoings done mainly by select politicians. British Raj had it’s pros and cons like any civilisations. It's really unwise to dwelve too much into the past in many cases cause up until 1945, humanity as a whole, was much more brutal than today. In modern times, people have struggled a lot to make their lives better, and to a large part, they succeeded. Be it British, Indians, Bangladeshis.

The map shows controlled territories.

Would have been better if it had been pkmkb. BTW, its not basedpk for me, it is SedPk.

@@death_parade look at the letters before sedpk