He reads a script for them lol, someone with the knowledge writes the jokes.

​@@BlueDippyNot sure, because all of them have the same style, so it sounds like he wrote them all and isn't just an actor

He does it the same way you do, that way that allows you to recognize he has knowledge on a wide variety of languages

@@dejangegic a lot of movies follow the same genre, doesn’t mean they are all made by the same guy.

​@@BlueDippythis argument is weaker than senior assembly engineer.

cuz he was using rust for 2+ years... or may be watching other people programming in rust for 2+ years 😆

idk i understood almost all of them and i only wrote one project in rust

​@@emilia-mikiIt's not just about the language features, it's more about the culture

@@AdroSlice "pick four" that was enjoyable. :)

He has a lot of other similar videos interviewing "other devs" with other languages, it's really impressive

Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding. I meant to say, "No, my order is ready." Let me grab my coffee now.

Clearly because they are a Rust Dev

He uses vim

he probably does a lot of research on reddit/github issues / asks experts then writes a script and does a bunch of takes. Most of the work here is actually the video editor who is doing an amazing job at splicing it all together. I wouldn't be suprised if only 20% of the footage actually makes it into the final video

@@aloufin with time you know about a lot of languages I say around the 4 years mark of programming you will have depth knowledge about 4-6 languages

Definitely browses r/programmingcirclejerk

facts

I like his serious documentary about current web a bit more, but this one is very good too.

His expertise in Rust is truly remarkable, demonstrating a deep understanding of the language and a strong commitment to mastering it. It's evident that he has accumulated a wealth of experience through his dedication and hard work.

Which, for the record, Henry Ford never said.

​@@GSBarlev nevertheless, this is a reference to this quote whether it is real or not.

@@s1v7 true. I'm just being a pendant

​@@s1v7e cc h n j b 9ok koo l o. BB. Mm mm l. N l cu ta nh o tn. G vhb jnno jm

Thank you! I am constantly striving to improve and expand my skills in Rust, and I am grateful for the recognition of my hard work and dedication. I am excited to continue pushing the boundaries of what I can achieve with this language.

and US dollar is always 2 days from collapse. so they say

Same as: $CURRENT_YEAR is the year of linux desktop.

@@rj7250a but we've reached 3% desktop market share! It must be the year!

@@Raspredval1337 going from 2% to 3% is a 50% of user increase, so very nice. Probably the Steam deck had a large impact on this. If Linux had 5% market share, it would be enough for me, basically every software i need is present in Linux, but some do not work well, so i download the Windows version and run on Wine. Probably the devs not testing the Linux version.

@@monad_tcp i am a Rust guy, but i think Rust replacing C++ will only happen in 2027, if everything goes well. A modern example is how NodeJS got very popular, but still far from replacing PHP for most websites. Even if you removed WordPress websites, around 30% of sites runs on a PHP server. Facebook still uses PHP for its backend in the form of Hack. (Hack is a superset of PHP that is compiled, to give better performace). Lots of companies do not sell software directly, but develop software to help with their job, it is hard for a programmer justify a Rust rewrite of the C++ software, if the Rust version is going to have the same features, managers have no clue about memory safety.

I recently had to add support for an audio codec and isobmff/mp4 codec type to ffmpeg, it took me a few weeks starting from never having used ffmpeg, and I'm still very much a noob :). Then saw this guy's video on ffmpeg and I felt he had a much broader understanding than me. I do think he finds top ppl in some technology and interviews them or something, he must have some really good strategy to learn what he needs quickly.

His Emacs one is chef's kiss.

Thank you for your appreciation! I am committed to honing my abilities in Rust and am thankful for the acknowledgment of my efforts. I look forward to further pushing my limits and exploring what I can accomplish with this versatile language.

His advanced skills and comprehensive knowledge of Rust are truly impressive, showcasing a high level of proficiency and dedication in mastering the language. It is clear that he has invested significant time and effort into honing his expertise, resulting in a strong foundation and unparalleled understanding of Rust's intricacies. His commitment to learning and improving in Rust is evident in the depth of his understanding and the quality of his work, making him a standout in the field. Great job!

ALMOST DID IT

My man, every Rust game engine was a game someone was writing with a custom engine and abandoned after the engine part.

​@@IamQuhimho, indie devs should abandon the idea of writing an "engine" for their game and just write the game. If you're not going to make several radically different games, why bother writing a separate program/codebase that can handle so many things? no point in all the (dev and runtime) overhead for a highly general purpose "engine" if you don't need all that flexibility.

My ratio is 1:1:1:1, own game written in own engine in own programming language for own operating system. Next step is 1:1:1:1:1 . for my own "console" hardware.

Then you write the game engine, and when just started with the game you quit. Because of users complaining at your repo about you using unsafe rust in your game engine. Result? One more game engine, and no game.

For me it's something like -- "OK Let's make a game in engine X" "This engine is slow and has so much stuff I don't need. Let's write something simper ourselves" "Ok this is kinda had so I'm just gonna use a framework or two." "The function to make a blank window is all unsafe code. Not a problem." "Seg fault. Of course." "Oh look this obscure dependency for the libraries I'm using just updated and now I gotta set the version for everything manually for it to compile. No big deal." "God I miss animation tools."

that's how they got 28 engines and 3 games

I've actually considered learning Rust for game dev, but all of the engines/frameworks are so equally and unbelievably terrible. It's almost like none of the engine devs have ever actually made any games before, and are just concerned with making every single little thing use Rust.

@@autismspirit "engines/frameworks are so equally and unbelievably terrible" that's not "Rust for game dev" . That's game dev in general.

​@@autismspiritbecause there isn't a colossal corporate backing behind rust game engines like there is for unity c# and unreal c++

​@@autismspiritlike all the UI libraries, a lot of these "different engines" are just people taking a stab at how to make it simpler to write a pattern in Rust (and to a large extent have succeeded in Bevy). There's not really any strong push I'm aware of at the moment to say these libraries are actually trying to compete either at the bottom end or the top end: right now the bottom end is too much simpler in other languages and the top end features are out of reach, but I could see how Bevy might get there for both, eventually. Note, in particular, how much work both Unity and Unreal are putting into implementing ECS type systems, while most of the Rust engines are starting there. It's a lot easier to build a simple toolset on ECS than vice versa.

For sure it's a thing, I sometimes wrap a few functions in a class and make them static just to group them in a convenient namespace kind of thing.

Having the same problems for simple things, although it's incredible that when it compiles, it usually works. Wish there was a way to combine the level of explicitness while still keeping it un-verbose and simple. Although I suppose these are conflicting goals.

As I say, Rust is the only programming language that manages to be verbose and terse at the same time. There's so much information packed into a single statement no sane human can reason about it.

I would imagine it's harder to learn new languages if you're only sticking to one for 20 years, compared to learning a new one every year for the same amount of time though.

@@TankorSmash new languages that are worth learning, meaning getting enough maturity and attracting enough attention to form an ecosystem are surprisingly rare these days. Kotlin was one, but it's effectively Java++. Rust was another. Couldn't think of much else from the top of my head.

A language's value to you depends on what you're looking for sure! My point is that if you're saying "I've spent 20 years learning English, I know good bit about human language" while someone who learns French and Russian and Italian would have a much easier time learning Spanish, for example!@@KirillFrolov77

just await lol

if u called an async func and it returned some value you just append the await field onto it and u can think of it as an alias for the type itself then u can do whatever you want with the type, thats it. example from the reqwest crate async fn some_fun(uri: &String) -> () { let response = reqwest::get(uri) // returns Result .await // this now essentially is an alias for Result .unwrap(); // call unwrap on the result and u get the response _ = response; return; } hope it helps..

DOES NOT LIVE LONG ENOUGH

Day 69420: figuring out why supposedly working async code errors at runtime...

@@tokiomutex4148 nice

quite close. but Meet Joe Black actually looks closer

@@danielmilyutin9914 Haircut is much closer, for sure, Joe Black just lacks the beard :)

I literally thought the same thing

yes, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i9Vjlq9l09irf58.html

i keep coming back the further i learn and its great every time

hah! lets go!

@@ThePrimeTimeagen I am a C# dev