fax

Ur A man of culture I see

yum

I don't trust a guy with a head shape like that though. Sus.

Good point, I hear people say the same thing about the Carnivore Diet. "I only eat meat and I feel so much better". You mean you restricted your food, lowered calories until you were in deficit and you lost weight and you feel better .... big surprise.

Totally. I have a really reactive appetite (always normal weight with no attention), and had multiple days in a row where I basically ate food with 50% sugar. I really paid attention, but besides a slightly bad conscience, no difference in Energy or how I felt.

Hopefully they pin this comment

Essential info.

Why does this make me think you're referring to the deathcore/metal core/"core" *"BLEEEEGHH!" ?

That's why I only smoke crack once a week.

I always try making sure I fit my heroin use in my macros, as long as your burning more then your taking in! Or is it never get Hogg on your own supply… idk I’m not a dr

@@timgazsy666 the 'dose' can be anything from a single molecule to gallons a day. broccoli has arsenic in it, but you're very unlikely to die from it. carrot juice is one of the healthiest things you can drink, but if you have a gallon a day you'll die of liver failure within 2 weeks.

@@habibsspirit w-what kind crack is that? The kind of crack I do is eaten/licked, not smoked...

@@deioped YOU are what you eat… 💩

That's on the list! - Dr. Mike

@@RenaissancePeriodization pls! Also could u do one on the optimal level of body fat depending on your goals? ie, bodybuilding (lower is better obviously, but maybe what you should train at and how far you should push the bulk), powerlifting, calisthenics/gymnastics, BJJ, other or combat sports in general, and just general health

This is what he should have done in the first place. Fat has been demonised since the 70s, falsely. Sugar has not falsely been demonised. You can blame Ancel Keys for both proliferations.

if you wanted a number to use while you wait for the video Broderick Chavez(TeamEvilGSP) recommends 0.5g per kg as a minimum

0.3gr per kg fat max. I do less and prefer more carbs

"I do not say BLEH BLEH BLEH!"

You should look up a video from Kiana Doherty about what happens to your body when you eat processed foods, really good stuff

Should clarify, the video is the good stuff, not the food! 😅

@@A_Turner Thanks for the suggestion, mate.

He literally said that basically

Regarding your comment about the warburg effect - what if i told you that you got that particular argument against eating sugar completely backwards?

@@kakefisk I would say you need to show how a cell without mitochondria, or with very little left can utilize fatty acids, and ketones. Either that, or show that they do not need energy. Here is the spoiler. They cannot. Cancer cells of any kind all rely on fermentation for energy. Either glucose, or glutamine.

@@leinekenugelvondoofenfocke1002 no, thats not quite what i meant. Sugars arent bad for you because warburg. Cancer cells will take what they want no matter how much sugar you put in your diet, even if you cut it out completely.

@@kakefisk If you want to make the case that eating no sugar alone doesn't stop them past a certain stage then that's fair, but it does slow them down. Why do you think diabetics have a higher incidence of cancer? You actually have cancer cells in your body right now though. Even if you do not have a tumor. The more sugar, the more the chance the situation can get out of control. This is the pg13 explaination, if we talk about how glucose can damage the mitochondria, and provoke a cell to become cancerous you would be deathly afraid of it. You should look at whats happening at Paleomedicina in Hungary. Glucose reduction is being used as an actual treatment there. It is also being used to help with other treatments everywhere else.

@@leinekenugelvondoofenfocke1002 diabetics having increased risk of cancer , if true, could stem from a multitude of different sources, as risk of diabetes, and overall health, is also impacted by a multitude of different factors. You know this. Just saying "because sugar" is just a god of the gaps fallacy until it has been demonstrated or shown causally. Reducing sugars in the diet does not necessarily slow down cancer in general, some types of cancer actually gets more aggressive as a response to a lack of available nutrients. I would love to know how you define "cancer cells", because i dont agree with that having cells that didnt replicate flawlessly (ref hallmarks of cancer) is the same as having cancer cells in the body. If anything i'd wager that the factors that cause mitrocondrial dysfunction is independent of sugar intake.

I'd say you can easily overat while you're consuming fruit regularly. But it's likely not the fruit that's the issue. And while it's anecdotal to some degree, this is coming from someone with weight issues in the extremes in the past and is consuming a lot of fruit daily. I LOVE bananas, mangos, apples, grapes, melons all sorts of berries basically all fruits. I'd even go so far as to say that fruits is the one food group that keeps me sane. My blood sugar is amazing. I feel energetic. I don't slow down during the day due to digestion. I'm as full as I can reasonably be (considering the issues that I had). On the overating. I eat fruit by the pound almost daily. I eat more fruit than I have ever seen anybody else eat fruit. However, even I don't eat 15 bananas in one day. I could, but I don't. I eat a lot of apples during the day, usually 3 to 5. But I don't eat 15 or more. Why is that? Probably a variety of reasons. Fruit doesn't give me massive cravings. I want to eat fruit, I like eating fruit, but I'm not going insane over not eating it. It also doesn't HAVE to be inhuman amounts. It's filling amounts, certainly that's kind of the goal here - but I'm not completely overdoing it. And if I did - 15 bananas likely isn't even 1500 calories worth of food. I need about 3500 cals at maintenance on a regular day. So there's this massive amount of bananas with all the volume and fiber coming along with it and I'm not even halfway through my daily calories. And even if I did overconsume calories that day it a) either won't be by much or b) it won't have been the bananas that were the issue here. And going even further: Overeating is only really a problem if you're doing it regularly. Maybe I do eat 15 bananas in one day, then. Am I going to do it every day? Certainly not. Again, fruit usually doesn't come with massive cravings like donuts, cake, pizza, fries and such, which people don't usually get sick of. I'm just going to go ahead and assume that if you're consuming 100 bananas over the course of a week, almost certainly will every single person be absolutely sick of it. Actually my main issue with this theoretical approach to overeating bananas would be digestion due to all that fiber. EAT FRUIT. It's chockful of healthy shit. It fills you up. It gives you some energy. It's sweet! It goes great with almost anything. It does actually improve digestion if you don't eat insane amounts.

@@Janmann2007 I mean, technically you can overeat on almost anything, 15 bananas would actually net you around 1500 calories. But the question is not "Can you overeat", the question is, "If you just eat normally, will you overeat". Put a bowl of 10 apples in front of yourself, and then a bowl with an 200 grams of candy, I know which one is most likely to be eaten.

@@jarldue123 Not sure what you think I'm saying but I'm saying the exact same thing as you. You CAN technically overeat on fruit, but it's a) highly unlikely and b) highly unsustainable (like, on a mass phase almost nobody could keep up a 8-12 week surplus with heavy emphasis on fruit). And even if you are not able to moderate fruit intake and do overeat - again, hypothetically, as it's highly unlikely 98% of the population would even get this far - , it's just not nearly as bad. If I completely overeat on bananas while eating normally otherwise I'm going to max out at like 4000-4500 calories AT WORST while overeating on pizza and cake I know from my own experience I can easily hit 10000+ cals in a day for an extended period of time and only that one is an actual problem.

I think he is making a mistake comparing a fruit GI like "oh this fruit has a lot of sugar but the GI is low!" like yeah, but fruit also has a lot of other things like fiber that isn't present in most cereals and other sugary things. You can't look at merely the sugar content but also the other things that go with it and can contribute to a lower GI value regardless of the amount of sugar.

You should hit him up! I hardly am considered a bodybuilder and hit him up off the cuff while in town. He trained with me and gave me great advice in between sets. Real down to earth, funny ASF and made a fan for life. He had absolutely nothing to gain by doing so but did anyway!

or a nightmare, but the hurts-so-good anabolic kind lol

don't worry, I'm sure he'll just tell you the opposite during your next appointment so that he and his "patients" can deny that he gives bad advice.

Did he also say "buy my cook book“?

Your doctor is the doctor who's not a doctor.

Big fruit isn't a thing but companies like coca cola nestle and other processed food giants constantly lobby against the demonization of sugar. Even though sugar in that refined form(sweets,sodas, candy) without any fiber like fresh fruit is just empty calories and has about as much nutritional value as eating a few spoonfuls of lard but doesn't even provide anywhere near the amount of satiety per calorie(it's more likely to make you hungrier even) as lard so it's even worse. Btw i'm not saying one should eat pure lard but neither should we drink sodas or eat a bunch of mars bars

@@Goriaas Lard is more nutritious than sugar and arguably more healthy than sunflower oil for people sensitive to inflammation

@@actuitivevisrl1014 Yes I agree but just eating pure lard is still empty calories. It's incredibly energy dense but it' would be a healthier "snack" than soft drinks or sweets, but I don't see anyone doing it

Doing this.

is this true

@@internetuser9342 Story is true, but I dont if what he told me is

Get more tips from him and share them here.

@@soubanjaved5654 Invaluable old school knowledge

Check their playlists. They have a guide to hypertrophy.

What would unlike to be covered specifically?

What do u know abt the substitutes

yup

You are 100% correct this video is delusional and TERRIBLE advice in the sense that assumes everyone is a perfectly calorie-counting discplined machine. 99.99% of the population are NOT counting calories that's why say 800 calories from sodas are HUGELY different from 800 calories from apples(with all the fibre), which in turn are different from 800 calories from say nuts. Saying high carb works on calorie counting diets it's hugely irrelevant so much so that even mentioning it is kinda stupid except for professional athletes or bodybuilders that count calories satiety and letting your body self regulate food with hunger is MASSIVELY important

@@Goriaas it's nobodies fault but your own that you lack the ability to listen. He said multiple times in the video that calories must be equated, and even addressed the fact that people eat junk food that isn't satiating that is generally a mixture of sugar and fats. The only people this video is dangerous to are the people that are dangerous to themselves (probably much like yourself)

@@JoshBenware I stand by what I say not cautioning against highly processed carbs is irresponsible. Of course you won't gain weight on a junk food diet if you properly count calories(which 99.99% of the population don't), but it's unhealthy anyways even if you don't gain weight. sugar from whole fruits is fine and he said as much. That was the only good part of the video. Fatty and high carb junk foods(french fries, chips, donuts) are bad too but sugar without protective fiber is the worst offender period. Sodas have no fat and moderate calories but they are the worst "food" in circulation. Of course they won't kll you outright but drinking 20oz of soda a day is pretty similar to smoking when it comes to health deterioration and years of life expectancy lost. There are plenty of studies on it. If this video was called "are 5 cigarettes a day ACTUALLY bad for you" people would lose their shit rightfully so....

@@Goriaas to be fair, he never did say drinking coke is healthy. However, comparing it to smoking is on the other extreme end of reasoning. Eating healthy is optimal to being the healthiest you can be. Eating not so healthy while keeping health markers in check is not optimal, but most elderly people have done just fine despite it.

@@TheJackOfAllTrades777 straw or not, liquid will come into contact with at least some teeth

My dentist said, along with too much sugar mostly from sugary drinks, that tannins from tea drinks stain the teeth and has a “sticky” effect as well. I was shocked when he said coffee doesn’t stain it’s mostly tea/iced tea.

@@lanceanderson7879 lol

@@lanceanderson7879 yeah sugar is pretty sticky

But is the sugar itself actually bad

Also what about pure fructose vs glucose or sucrose

Dr. Mike mentioned being mindful of which source your sugar is paired with, like 'tasty fats', aka a candy bar and also pointed out some sources of sugar are less fibrous than others.... so he addressed 2 of your points in the video, just not exclusively the way you phrased them.

@@mihailmilev9909 I think you need to watch the video again. Sugar itself is not bad. Fructose, glucose and sucrose are slightly different chemical bonds because they come from different sources, aka fruit, milk and something like table sugar, but are all monosaccharide carbohydrates that your body uses and stores relatively the same. One is not worse than the other. They are all carbs that your body uses for energy or stores for later usage. It's overeating macronutrients that causes weight gain/fat gain and more serious diseases like heart disease, diabetes, etc. derive from multiple factors, not just one. So sugar is not THE single cause for heart disease. Overeating, excess body fat, poor cardiovascular health, poor nutrient consumption effect things like vascular health, which makes it harder for blood to be delivered to tissues, which makes your heart have to pump harder to deliver blood and is ultimately stressing the heart more, which could cause a heart attack. Serious diseases are multi-factorial. I recommend you check out kzfaq.infovideos for in-depth videos on nutritional science.

@@therealfitshorty thank you so much for the reply

Define excessive

excessive of anything can be bad.

True, but so has excessive fat, and I'm sure protein. In fact, if you match for calories, most of the excesses go away. - Dr. Mike

I think the pro-inflammatory effect is simply from the amount of excess weight/food in people who eat a lot of sugar and aren’t physically active/do not control their calories. I’ve seen a lot of bloodwork from either obese or lean individuals and the obese individuals almost always have high inflammatory markers. While in people who are not obese(they don’t even have to be lean-just not obese) inflammation is rarely elevated and is caused by an underlying condition, even after a day of binging on “cheat” food. Again I think, it is the caloric control over long periods and not letting yourself get in an insulin resistant and heightened visceral fat state.

@@KotaTiGaSmota I believe you're conflating two different sources of inflammation. Yes, obesity etc can be inflammatory but so can too many refined carbs, regardless of weight, at least I believe that's what the JDBD was referring to, as opposed to body composition based inflammation etc. Anecdotally eliminating refined carbs made a difference to my joint pain, and I've never been overweight. I'd like to know more about the science behind why this is although I have a theory that it's multifactorial and will vary with immune system, genetics, cytokinetics, and microbiome. For the record I have nothing against sugar in moderation.

This use to be me !!! 😅😭 , I was SO EXTRA when I realised I was having alot of sugar on a long bulk & after that I became very OCD about it to the point I would get anxiety over it up until I studied nutrition PROPERLY.

@@amoon.93 You have to be specific about what kind of sugar you're talking about, fructose from fruit? no problem obviously. Added sugar? well, yikes that is bad.

@@Danuxsy This video has some information for you

@@Danuxsy it's like u didn't even watch the video

@@Danuxsy if you're consuming sugars around training at the appropriate time & in the appropriate quantities, it really isn't that deep whether you choose added sugars or natural sugars particularly if the GI score is similar. The main difference are the added benefits(micronutrients) you would get from fruit for example making it a superior options vs a biscuit/bar. Some natural sources of sugar (some fruit for example) have a high GI score too so obv looking at GI score is probably a better option, & we usually need high GI foods if we're training intensely&need to top up depleted glycogen stores + especially if we're training again in less than 24hrs in which case topping up these stores asap post training is important&a high GI option would be good for this. I'm qualified in advanced sports&exercise nutrition so I understand it alot better now. I was very OCD&EXTRA about ALL sugars, including fruits with a low GI score not realising that other foods without "added" sugars like corn, white rice, boiled white potatoes etc. also have a high GI score & whatever is left over/unused is stored as glycogen regardless anyway! Now I take a moderate approach&consume the sugar that is needed around training & if that means it's abit of added sugar then so be it. I generally eat more fruit now vs before as I'd still like the additional micronutrients & try to stay in check w/myself to ensure I don't obsess too much as I've actually seen a benefit of sipping on maltodextrin & even pure glucose powder too during and after training when it comes to energy+recovery,&on those days total sugar could be as high as 60g total including EVERYTHING which is fine since it isn't every single day & my training sessions are long & very intense + I keep active (how else are you meant to progress+make gains if you aren't fuelling yourself properly?) I would not have done this back when I became obsessed over it. If I had more than 25g of total sugar a day , it felt like the end of the world which is a terrible mindset to have, particularly when your body NEEDS it ! Common sense, active individuals who train more than 5+hrs a weeks need more than the average person so we need to keep that in mind & we also have more room to manoeuvre w/how much we have than an inactive individual does since we're using what we consume. Either way, balance is key 👌🏼