He never thought he'd get caught. He thought he was "above" suspicion because of his position.

@Zombie Hunter indeed

@@blakeadamson1576 I mean he could’ve at least invited the second best lmao

@@spook407 yeah, but you know how it is. A police man gets away with stealing an unguarded object and suddenly he thinks he's friggin Arsene Lupin.

"Not a good plan".

Yeah, I don't understand why some folks are spouting hate. It's really not that bad and it's not even offensive

@@warriorsorb1111 Because his movies are written and structured as a deconstruction of Poirot. And those are always controversial

​@@warriorsorb1111Some people are too big of fans of the previous Poirot actors to accept a new one. Others really hate that he gave him mustaches based on the book.

Beware of people in positions of power, as they approach a man only when they need him. They seem like good friends in good times, but they don't stay for him in time of his trouble.

@@Draftsman_of_Doom That was exactly Poirot’s logic, too

israel is an apartheid state responsible for one of the worst ethnic cleanings of history

Apparently go big or go home 😅

Death on the Nile

@@callanflanagan8706 hell yeah

Hercule

Hercule. Sherlock relies heavily on spotting physical evidence, and Batman relies on expensive toys and punching people.

Sherlock and Poirot, Batman is out

Sherlock rather i guess is very clever and sort of unreal.. but Hercule also clever and can be real.. with all sort of human things in him. But Batman is out of the league

Benoit Blonc has entered the chat.

How so?

What do you mean?

U didn't want to know this 🤣😂😂

I mean, it wouldn’t be as controlled and would’ve injured the stunt actor

Even though he catches criminals

@@hamidzaidi4431 Batman is a sociopath wearing a bat mask who has to go out over and over again to capture his “criminals.” Ring around the rosy. Hercule doesn’t. He gets his man and has his eggs once they’re evenly matched.

@@Legba85 sociopaths don't care about others. Batman does. Blame the writers for Batman recapturing the same criminals over and over again. Not the character.

He's Belgian, not French. 😜

I feel like beyond the cast members it has nothing in common with your joke so they cannot steal it.

Have you watched Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit? He also directed that.

Intelligent doesn’t mean respectful, but also he did it to catch the bad guy

MrLantean actually, most of the Christians in the Middle East are oriental orthodox not Eastern Orthodox (mostly Coptic, Syriac, and armenian Apostolic). Also, like you said, there are still Catholics in Jerusalem. And in this movie, the priest happened to be a catholic instead of orthodox. There’s nothing wrong with it. He’s probably a member of the Latin patriarchate of Jerusalem, which is Roman rite not eastern rite.

I had totally forgotten about Oriental Orthodox Church. Its true that it is the dominant Christian denomination in the Middle East while Eastern Orthodox Church is the second place. The clerical robes is that of Roman Catholic clergy since the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem is after all the Roman Catholic Episcopal See of Jerusalem. I just find it odd and unusual to have Christians of Jerusalem be represented by a Roman Catholic clergyman as Roman Catholics are a small minority. I believe that depicting an Orthodox clergyman should be a more accurate setting..

MrLantean just more recognizable to a western audience

@@MrLantean The largest Christian denomination in Israel is Greek Catholic, followed by (Greek) Orthodox and then Latin Catholic and then a number of much smaller denominations. In any event, though, the whole scene is off. The Sepulchre (which, by the way, is not "above" the Western Wall at all) has been divided for centuries between the Orthodox and Catholics and some smaller groups, the leader of the Jews at the time looked nothing like that (in fact, there was no single leader); they would not have the power to "divide up market times," not that market times have ever been "divided" nor were ever a sticking point; they would not have been meeting in the church- indeed, the rabbi probably would have preferred not to enter anyway; the head of police's job would in no way be dependent on unrest or quiet; the loss of relic would probably not lead to the threatened unrest; no huge announcements would be made at the Western Wall, which in any event had no large plaza at the time...I can go on. The fact that the priest is Catholic is a problem, but hardly the largest.

Retard. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher have three custodians: the Roman Catholic Church, the Greek Orthodox Church, and the Armenian Apostolic Church. Edit your comment now and retract your falsehood.

Actually, the Ottoman Empire ended in 1922. The movie is set in 1934.

Its clearly on English rule

Actually it was under the Franco-british mandate at that time

Plenty of Arab-on-Jewish violence then too.

I was wondering: were there a lot of Europeans living in Jerusalem during the British Mandate of the Palestine ?

*Palestine not Israel

The only reason it is holy because MAN made it so. All religions, especially The Abrahamic are man made. Acknowledge this and world can finally smell peace again.

Religon is on the way out. Science rules now and forever. Deal with it, and down with silly superstitions.

Uh please don't kill me but what's significant about the Western wall? Google wasn't alot of help

It didn't exist in 20's

It would be impossible for a country the size of the UK to control a quarter of the world without local support. I don't think it would be too far removed to use manpower from other territories to police different parts.

Yeah Black people only got invented in 2010 /s 🙄

You are mistaken.

If I remember, British even needed Indians to patrol in other colonies. It wouldn't be too surprising to see a black policeman in Jerusalem in this period.

She would get over it for the mustaches. The hat and bow tie were not what she out down in books.