yo

Sup Kermit

@@jonnyarnett how you doing? last time i had an interaction with you was months ago

One thing I would like to say about the 60s is that there where more field goal attempts because there was no 3 point line, also if you take away 7% of the rebounds wilt and russel had (because of the lower shooting percentage) they would still be far ahead of everyone else since dennis had nearly 6k while wilt had 9k. Another thing to point out is that faster pace of play isnt a justification to why they had so many rebounds because it's not a bad thing. Even if wilt and bill played today they would grab similar amounts of rebounds. I pointed out the 3 point line earlier because even a half court shot would be counted as a field goal which is why it seems so low. Next time you should adjust the stats without the inflation just to see how good they would be regardless if it was inflation or not. I just found it a little bit disingenuous and unfair to the 60s players that u would say that but I still like your video. Another thing is that for players like dennis you should include years where they played less than 50 games because that was common occurrence, you should exclude seasons based on them being outliers and not based on a random number like 50 games.

​@@kermit1056 I'm doing well! Other than the fact that my injured Lakers are falling apart. lol. Appreciate you dropping in as always

Elgin Baylor, he definitely is one of the all time greats.

History has neglected his legacy as the offensive equivalent of Bill Russell as a breakthrough player. Baylor was the first African-American in the NBA to average at least 20 points and double-digit rebounds for a season, and he did it as Rookie of the Year in 1958-59. His offensive exploits would soon be overshadowed by Chamberlain, and he had to share the ball with the equally impressive Jerry West on his own team. I don't know when the term "hang time" came along, but I do know Baylor was the first to display that talent on an NBA court. His legacy will be available to everyone who is curious about the history of professional basketball. All it takes is checking the statistical leaders of his time, because his name is near the top year after year.

Rip Baylor

Learning of this now, RIP Elgin, all-time one of a kind.

@@blocker1928 Arguably the greatest player to never play on a championship playoff team (he retired too early in 1972, but the Lakers gave him a ring that year ANYWAY).

"Before there was Michael Jordan doing amazing things in the air, there was Elgin Baylor! A true class act and great man" ~ Magic Johnson

he wasn't injured I think he was in the military service

Elgin and the big O are very underrated because of the time they played in

Obviously Kobe is the best player in Lakers history but Baylor is the reason the Lakers exist today because they would’ve gone bankrupt without him

I would have loved to see all those 60a and 50s players play today to see just how good they would be

If u adjust for inflation wilt is still just as good at rebounding as Rodman if not slightly less but it would be because of Rodmans passion for rebounding while wilt just picks up the ball when he sees it

Not really when if you adjust stats Rodman would become a better rebounder than wilt

@@yogrannybae5189 Rodman is an underrated rebounder by some, he's as good as Russell and wilt if not better, include moses malone in the best rebounders list aswell

@@yogrannybae5189 "if" and "adjust" don't combine with "stats".

@@emanuelr.desousa6878 I like the "36 minutes per game adjust" hehe So if Wilt played 48 minutes you just take away 25% of his stats?? How does that work?? Today's stat people just don't get it.....

Rip

@Ethan Hill I agree, he is underrated

Wait he did? Rip respect to that legend

Thank god he got to live his life

It's rough to learn this after watching Westphal's great (and especially appreciative, not only asked for Elgin as a guest but also wanted to take a minute of his occasion to exactly show appreciation to him and what he did) HOF enshrinement ceremony. Two legends, Baylor will always be a special phenomenon.

Idk dude, 2012-2016 Bron was also pretty insane, I think its up for debate

@@TheDesisgarf are you saying the wrong years were used in the video. The video used 2010-2014

@@Sf75178 in my opinion, yes. Although 2010-2014 has 1 more MVP and is probably better statistically, 2012-2016 doesnt include his horrific 2011 finals performance and it does include his 2016 finals performance, which is arguably the greatest finals performance ever. Also in 2015 he had a monstrous playoff run and single handedly took GSW to a 6 game series. So idk, 2010-2014 was better in the regular season but overall Im going with 2012-2016

@@TheDesisgarf it would be good if the video included playoff stats just rings and FVMP but it only used regular season stats.

@@Sf75178 that kinda confused me because the whole video he only talked about the regular season but at the end he included rings and FMVP into each players portfolio.

🧢

@@hadrianfaber2738 you can believe me or not but I promise you I watched it yesterday or at least the day before

Bro I promise you the same exact thing happened to me

Yoooo sameeee

Wow. I was gonna comment this and several of you did the same thing. Wtf? I looked through the spreadsheet yest for about 30 mins and was wondering what the 5yr would be for certain players like tmac or rodman.

Nah Russel would gain all of the defensive records not wilt

Oh my god, you mj fans are so boring.

@@shadowduke1535 Wilt was as good a shot blocker as Russell, probably better. Steals is harder to evaluate from the unofficial stats and video archives. Russell would have won more DPOY, been All-Defense every year, and of course Finals MVP.

@@UnconventionalReasoning Wilt was actually a great stealer, one example, in the 1965 NBA Finals during the Havlicek Stole the ball, it was Wilt who stole the ball to Bill Russell in the final seconds of the game, and then Philly could have won the game if it wasn't for Havlicek stealing the ball to Philly.

How old are you 95?

wilt is easily the greatest athlete to ever play in the NBA

Winning matters Wilt only won 2 titles and that was with another all time great in Jerry west

@@Killer23TrZ they only had 9 teams in the NBA during the 60s-70s and Wilt can't win a Chip? LOL! How is that great?

@@randymonster4105 lmao individuals win championships ? ROBERT HORRY HAS 7 RINGS !!! IS HE BETTER THAN MJ KOBE OR LEBRON ?!!!!!

I dont know how he hasn't blown up yet

Exactly I didn’t realise he didn’t even have 100k yet, I view him as like a jxmy high roller type channel

No, 1,000,000+ channel

I hope he reach those number soon.

@@lennybiker3451 me too

I think Kobe, MJ, Lillard, Harden, Wilt and some others have at least one 40 ppg month.

@@nikosofidemporas hater it’s Lin

Lol

Didn’t James Harden average 40 a month at some point?

@@machoboys8884 Wilt said it once in an interview with Bill, he said that he averaged like 70 for the last 10 games, the season b4 his 50ppg season

MJ's career sucked outside the championship years. He's the 80s Russell Westbrook

MJ's 5 years was Ridiculous. He wasn't injured. He simply didn't want to play. Stupid video. He came back after more than a year, so he was refreshed. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@@octopus8420 well, LeBron's career sucks even with the chips. He only led the league twice in 2 statistical categories, which are scoring and assists. He never won any DPOY. He only has 5 defensive 1st teams when he clearly is the biggest dude in his position. He has 4 MVPs in an 18-year career. He has 2 bronze medals until Kobe stepped in. And lastly, he lost 6 Finals series, 2 of which he was supposed to win (Dallas and 2014 SAS). In hindsight, Jordan's 80s career is better than LeBron's whole career. 63pts vs Celtics, 40ppg twice in 2 playoff runs, MVP, DPOY and scoring champion in the same year, defensive selections, 2 slam dunk titles, 3 scoring titles, 3 steals titles.

@@jeraldvincentzumel5300 I was with you until you said 80s Jordan had a better career. I can understand 87-91 vs 2011-15, but 80s Jordan can’t compare to LeBrons full career.

@@jeraldvincentzumel5300 lol that gotta be the dumbest thing I ever read.

Yep, listen to your dad

He would take your breath away with the things he would do

No, it’s Clayton Crownley or Jimmy Highroller

Hell nah Jonny Arnett is better wtf

Jxmyhighroller is

😂😂😂

In that 5 year stretch he won 0 rings, so no, definitely not the GOAT in my book. To me, the GOAT is NOT ONLY a winner but also individually THE person responsible for those wins at the highest level (rings).

@@giffengood I think it still comes down to LeBron and Jordan

@@giffengood if we talking first 5 years its probably Larry bird

@@giffengood in wilts 1st finals appearance he put up a good fight even blowing the Celtics out one game and all but 1 game of his 4 losses were close as hell so he had a serious chance of winning if he had taken a few extra shots that series, either way wilt single handedly carried a team to the finals and that isn't easy

You have to win as well as put up stats so no he’s not the goat

with him it's a bad thing because he forgone a lot of good defensive years to have that longevity considering how physically gifted he was, he planned his longevity it didn't just happen, he spent millions on himself to last this long just padding his numbers

@@jeortiz-luis4288 the funny thing is, as how things stand right now, Jordan stll leads LeBron by 1 MVP, 2 rings, 2 Finals MVPs, 9 scoring titles, 3 steals titles, 1 DPOY and 6 defensive 1st teams. To put that in perspective, those are KD's accolades and then some. 18 years and counting and the gap is still KD's resume.

Not true at all. LeBron is a better passer, playmaker, rebounder and 3PT shooter than Jordan even without the longevity. I say this as believing Jordan is the GOAT with Lebron 2nd.

@@jeraldvincentzumel5300 did you write MVP two times

@@jeraldvincentzumel5300 also if that is kd resume Kd can't apply for a goat position

Then why does wilt hold 70 records

@@watergarage8343 Because modern rules were mostly non-existent and Wilt was a physical anomaly for any time, especially his. He wouldn't have gotten most of those records if he played today because of all the added rules and restrictions. That said, Wilt was known as an underperformer in the playoffs, which is why MJ beats him in that arena statistically.

Wilt tears mj apart

@@giffengood fax

In the playoffs wilt was a underperformer. In the regular season he averaged 30pts in the playoffs it drops to 22pts he's a underperformer

Alvin Robertson belongs in jail.

He doesn't dissapear. It just shows that when you're trying to swerve a conversation into your arguments choosing, you can do it. This is what @JonnyArnett did in this video. He always states that he considers MJ the goat, which is fine. But the manner in which he's trying to prove it is inaccurate and what he often says - doesn't tell the whole story. Or to be even more precise, it misses a big chunk of the story. There are several huge flaws with his goat calculator, and they are: 1. The point assigning. You're telling me that leading "goat candidates" in steals and steals per game or blocks and blocks per game counts equally as a MVP and all nba awards, or even titles? 2. For the 5 major categories he mentioned, in all 5 the player that had the most in total also had the most in per game. So Wilt was number 1 in points and rebounds and gets 4 points? MJ was first in steal totals and spg and gets 2 points, while Russell gets 1 for 5 titles? Duncan gets 2 points for leading in blocks and blocks per game? 3. Since you mentioned Lebron, he picked the wrong 5 years. It should be either '09-'13 or '12-'16. I would pick '09-'13. Now suddenly we get a change. Lebron leads all players in MVP awards with 4, and he has the maximum number of all d 1st team selections. Now, under JonnyArnett's calculation, MJ loses 1 point (as do Kareem, Russell and Bird) and Lebron get's 1 point in all D selections. MJ now has 8, Lebron has 4, Bird and Kareem have 2 and Russell has 1. 4. Why use only 9 players? Why do you stop with GOAT counting at 9? If we were to add a few more players, we would probably add Hakeem. If we add Hakeem, MJ loses 1 DPOY point. I won't add him in the further calculation, just saying. If we were to equate the (almost) exact same categories (ppg and total points, bpg and total blocks etc.), and also remove FG% (what does this have to do with goat conversation, he could've at least used TS% or something), we get these changes: MJ 7, Wilt 4, Magic 2, Duncan & Kareem 1 Now, if we would somehow try to value differently different things (as stated, blocks or steals and MVP's can't be measured the same), we could use this: MVP 5 points 1st team, FMVP, rings 4 points 1st D, DPOY 3 Scoring, assist, rebound titles; points, rebounds, assists, 1.5 points Steals, blocks titles; steals, blocks 0.5 points Now we have this MJ at 16.5 and Lebron has 16.0. No one else is even near - the next is Wilt with 6. But, if I would try to create a video to minimize MJ's total numbers, I would add Hakeem in the years he had 2 when he won DPOY. Hakeem is definitely a top 10 or 15 all time player. Now Lebron has 16.0 still, and MJ has 13.5. Additionally, I would totally exclude blocks and steals from this, and give 1 point for the scoring, assist and rebound titles, bouncing MJ down to 12.0. What's fascinating with both MJ and Lebron in these 5 seasons ('88-'92 and '09-'13) - they both dominated the league in advanced stats (VORP, BPM, PER and WS), leading the league in every single category these 5 seasons. So, 5 year Lebron (you can even choose a few versions of 5 years) is one of the best players ever.

@@Adam-tt5cs People have been clinging on to LeBron's career scoring numbers (and career numbers in general) and think that it's a solid argument for why he is the GOAT. They don't add nuance when taking numbers like these into consideration. They fail to see that it's a byproduct of his longevity. Quantity over quality, not the other way around. Unlike Stockton and as well as some of these players, whose numbers hold up despite being subjected to scrutiny. There are other metrics out there that people can hold on to when making the case for GOAT for any of the All-time Greats, because except for a few, these career totals are nothing but fluff. And I do understand how much of an amazing feat it is to rack up all those numbers. But when talking about the GOAT, we have to be splitting hairs, we have to be pedantic, we have to be hyper critical. So yeah, when subjected to scrutiny... Disappeared As in *poof* Dropped off Disappeared

@@kookurikapooh First, longevity matters for all players that are on this Jonny Arnett goat list - as it should. Durability, availability, etc. All 9 players played over 897 games (Larry Bird), and 7 of them played over 1000 (only Bird and Magic didn't). 2nd, Lebron was always considered one of the best all round players in NBA history and not the single best in any category. But still, on the all time scoring list he his 6th in ppg. And of the top 6 players, this could be checked out, he has played in the slowest pace. 3rd - back to pace, the Lebron '09-'13 stretch also interacts with one of the slowest paces in NBA history. Of all the players in this top 10 scoring list, only Kobe's 06'-'10 stretch was played in a slower pace. The average NBA pace from '09-'13 was 92. The pace for Jordan and Malone from '88-'92 was 98.5, meaning 7% more possesions. Also, in this 5 year stretch Malone played in 407 games out of 410, which puts him at 28.96 ppg. Lebron missed a big chunk of these games, mostly due to the lockout season in 2012. He only played in 374 games. Divide this with 10.392 points Lebron scored puts him at 27.8 ppg. Adjust this for pace (7%) we get at 29.7 ppg. Not to mention if we go lower to this list in seasons - not sure what the pace was in the '60s, but from '74-'78 it was 106.2, which is 15% faster than '09 to '13. 4th - during this 5 year stretch Lebron led the entire league in total points scored, scoring 2 more total points than Durant and playing 7 less games. Again, this proves me correct. When making this list pace wasn't factored in, because it goes in Lebrons favour. This isn't something Johnny Arnett would do. Johnny Arnett also wouldn't use MJ's highest scoring seasons ('86-'87), because the Bulls that season finished with a negative record (40-42). Which is another proof that scoring title mean little. So, yeah - proof that Lebron doesn't disappear and proof that, no matter what way someone wants to diminish the greatest 18 year stretch of any NBA player (trying to prove longevity doesn't matter) - this guy also had the best 5 and 10 year stretch. "But when talking about the GOAT, we have to be splitting hairs, we have to be pedantic, we have to be hyper critical." I understand this, you're right. But the manner in which you're splitting hairs matters. Not taking pace into consideration and using these stats isn't splitting hairs, it's not telling the whole story. Look at this - MJ didn't win a single playoff series without Pippen - which is the exact truth. MJ also doesn't have a single winning season without Pippen - which is also true. He never won a title without Phil Jackson. His team won 55 games without him and lost in 7 in the playoffs. Let's split these hairs, as well. He lost 3 times in the first round in a no zone league.

@@Adam-tt5cs Wanna put up the stats Pip had whenever they STARTED winning? You're gonna tell me Pip was an absolute All-star during the year the Bulls started winning? Nuance. It may be factual to say that Scottie was there when they started winning, but NEVER phrase it in a way that Scottie was the big reason why they won. Fact check this, MJ was averaging nearly as much as MVP Kobe during his 1st year. Now tell me MJ was the reason why they were losing. Consider maybe that everyone "probably" needs at least some level of help. Again, this is all about making it sound like Pip was the big reason they started winning. Context matters. Choice of words matter. So no, don't make it sound like that. 7% less possessions is somewhat significant, ain't it? Then again, you have to factor in the type of shooting LeBron opts to take as opposed to Kobe or Jordan, since you mentioned the two. Between the 3 of them, who go their points from the 2, the 3, or from the lay up or dunk the most? No brainer that LeBron mostly got his points from within 10ft. Between the 3, he drove to the basket more. Between the 3, he took the shot with the highest conversion rate (which is the lay-up and the dunk. And yet the percentage between, maybe just MJ and LeBron, is still close. Imagine letting a guy do 10 lay-ups and dunks and another guy do 10 junpshots and 5 dunks or drives and yet the two men end up close in field goals. Add to the nuance the long permeating idea that the defense nowadays is allowed little room to actually affect the offense, and how a significant amount of LeBron's career is played during an era which is easier to score. As opposed to other eras, such as MJ's era, maybe even some of Kobe's era, where the physicality was significantly more intense... Now considering that... Add that to LeBron's shit selection... He's elite, but scoring wasn't always his thing and he hasn't put up as much elite scoring seasons as compared to the rest of the elites in this list. It's plain to see, giving a player his best piece of work as the sample size... LeBron went from top 3 to zip in All-time Scoring. At least from the list that was shown. Make no mistake, LeBron is no doubt in people's all-time great list. People see him as either #1 and #2--validly so. You could argue that point, but people should stop huffing and puffing this oversimplified presentation of the All time Scoring highly in favor of LeBron without nuance or context. My original comment was simple. My point still stands. Accumulative stats are deceptive. Some of them are all fluff. I would love for you to come up with your own sample size for LeBron's top 5 seasons and actually prove that, after taking things into consideration, he would still be near his original ranking.

@@Adam-tt5cs Way to show who's fan you are by assuming I'm trying to diminish the "greatest 18 years stretch". Lemme make it simple. LeBron is elite LeBron is phenomenal If you want an argument for why LeBron is the GOAT, there are plenty of other stats and metrics out there. This ain't part of that. At leas not in the way people love to point out at big numbers and simply go "wow" without context. Again, if that ain't you, and if you ain't dumb or simple like that, I don't know why your offended. Maybe because I used the word "disappear"? Pfft. Again, he did. In the concept of this 5 and 10 year only consideration. Again, there are plenty of evidence out there to back LeBron's argument for being GOAT... This just ain't it, pure and simple.

Agreed. You can't compare another basketball player to MJ when he's essentially god tier like Ali level. As what Deion Sanders and Stefon Marbury said, you shouldn't compare MJ to another basketball player. Deion said it's basically blasphemous to do it and Starbury said there's MJ then your top 10 below him. 😁

@@lamefart did yall even watch the whole video? Jordan having so many greens were because he played after 1980. Wilt and russell would take his greens for FMVP, DPOY, and would gain in other awards if blocks and steals were recorded... like wilt would gain another 2 with the blocks alone

@@jesuschrististhelord9937 it’s unbelievable! People always ignore Wilt and if you bring him up they’ll have their lame excuses to dismiss his accomplishments only because they just have their favorite.

@@jesuschrististhelord9937 you missed my whole point but whatever makes you happy. 🤡

@@antonihardonk8970 contrary to what you said, I knew Wilt was holding back all throughout his career and a few times he let go someone got hurt. But he underperformed in the playoffs unlike MJ where his regular season numbers, as great as it is, even got better in the playoffs. It's a comparison between a dominant center and a guard. In a league where height is might, a guard dominated in the era of big men, the 4s and 5s who can camp in the paint.

Lol. Thanks. I've had some companies reach out before, but this is the one I really felt great about backing. I'm really liking the emails so far.

@@jonnyarnett congrats bro keep going up

Great point

Totally agree. As great as he is every stat goes down except for rebounds.

Wilt still edges him. 60-64 wilt average 34.6 in the playoffs, in 88-92 Jordan averaged 34.5 in the playoffs

For his 5 year prime. Wilt Chamberlain actually average more points in the playoff than MJ, if I'm not mistaken. 34.6 would be his average

And he still isn’t better than LeBron

@@wheathillstc8598 who's better than Lebron in flopping? He's not called LeFlop for nothing...

@@lamefart you cant just flop ur way to 4 rings 4 fmvps and 4 mvps. get a life.

@@m11anjackson in denial, are we? 🤣

Especially because Jordan was said to only be about 6’4.5”

Wilt at his best averaged like 40 ppg in like a 3 year span, kobe at his best averaged 43 for a single month, wilt averaged 60 for a month-

@@Poloskii He averaged 40 points for 515 consecutive games

@@imfrederic2312 lmao it sounds fake as hell when u say it like that and let's be real everybody wishes it was because there should not be anybody that good ever

Wilt would be considered at least the 2nd greatest of all time, if all statistics were taken back then, regardless of championships. In my opinion, he was even better than Jordan.

You can't be GOAT if your stats don't translate in the playoffs.

It would be 88-92 for Jordan. And 12-16 bron could compete. 12-13 two rings, 14-15 dominate individual seasons, and 16- another ring with maybe greatest narrative behind it (beating 73 win team, while leading both teams in all 5 stats). And also bill Russell multiple 5 year combos of having 5 rings with likely 5 finals mvp if they were a thing then while playing the best defense in the league

Lol he finna tell people I was a former nba guard with 3.9 seconds of play 😂

You mean wilt?

Yeah and people still say LeBron is "statistically better" like what? Also Wilt makes a huge case here

who BEAT WHO ? lARRY BIRD or Jordon ? dum dum

Holy, this dude is growing fast. It seems like yesterday when this dude was at 50k subs. Well deserved recognition

Hell yeah @@BasketballHighway19 the quality is so good, I was so lucky and stumbled across this channel at just over 10k subs and now to be at nearly 100k is inspiring

Well comments like this make my day too. Thanks :)

@@jonnyarnett its just the truth. Can't deny the truth

I think no doubt it would be Wilts 50 ppg season

@@yeeeaaah6248 Well accomplishments matter too…Wilt didn’t win MVP, finals mvp, ring, etc. It was amazing statistically, but it didn’t contribute to his team’s success as much as it should have

The players voted it

Stats wise that cannot be measured so obviously it cannot be included

That's why he's the goat 🐐

Not that I see

@@irishgrl What do you mean?

how did MJ fair against Larry Legend ?

@@kristalmacleod3215 If Larry didn't have back problems then Larry could be right next to Jordan

Good points man, my top 3 wilt, jordan, lebron in that order. Better watch all the lebron we can before he gone lol...

Thanks Fernando!

@Joshua Evans There's no guarantee Wilt would've gotten that many Defensive Player of the Year awards when Bill Russel was in the league at the same time. Also, Wilt had fewer titles, finals MVPs and league MVPs in that stretch. Considering the inflated rebounding of the era, all things considered, I'm still going with Jordan.

No, it doesn’t.

@Joshua Osabuehien I think a case can be made for Larry Bird.

@@dynamicflashy blocks, bpg, block titles definitely go to wilt which gives him 9. And bill Russell would drop Jordan to 7 if finals mvp and dpoy were a thing back then

First in what

@@stephenharris931 first comment

@@TheFastBreakNBA2 I was there you were not the first comment

@@stephenharris931 I'm not exactly sure, but if you go to "newest first", then you scroll all the way down, I'm pretty sure I was the one at the bottom. But I don't really care if I'm first.

@@TheFastBreakNBA2 ok I get it

"he had no left"

Delusional

Stfu

i think you meant to say 14-15 heat and not 13-14 heat. But your point still remains true. Lebron improves a team more than jordan no doubt he is the more impactful player.

Boy stfu

Copying and pasting once again. Come up with a different argument thank you