it's like a kid I went to school with in the 7th grade - Polish dude named Skumbowski. Kid didn't deserve that!

Thank you

Actually, this is a win for Heard because the Jury is going to judge it on the Title alone and not the content of the article. Depps Lawyers wanted to file a motion at that time because they don't want that. This video title is not accurate at all.

@@josephkelley8641 0

Next time - Don't waste our time.

I'm sure it's a great survival skill for her sanity.

She seems professional, stern, and honest. Seems genuinely nice too 👍🏻

I agree.

Typical Judge.. like they always are. nothing special. in westen world they acting almost the same no matter the state or country

Perfect temperament - I'd like to see her succeed Judge Judy.

If only they waited for SCOTUS a month or two. Was a joke but was it really haha

How can the judge say only the title matters after all this. The title says "I spoke up against sexual violence.." which isn't exactly about Johnny. It's actually in the article she calls herself a victim of domestic abuse. Now that doesn't count because it wasn't the title.? What kind of logic is that.?

Yes these are the types of judges that should be on the Supreme court

@@arunkp20 There are other jury instructions that pertain to other statements in the Op-Ed. [Edited to add this: i believe there are 7 pages of jury instructions; this was just one thing on the list. However, now i am wondering if this kind of clarification is going to happen again and again. I thought the instructions were pretty clear.]

@@arunkp20 It depends on what the meaning of "is" is.

she’s not only feelin it she’s living it bro.

She's a judge.It's her Job.

@@pokerface7611 People can do their jobs adequately. Do them badly. Do them well. Do them incredibly well while under global scrutiny.

Correction: Were feeling how she's felt during this entire trial. Definitely bless her heart.

Probably shouldn't project ur feelings onto her. You no idea how she feels

The UK trial was an absolute farce. The judge made his ruling based on pure hearsay instead of total evidence.

The legal system in the UK is a joke and they’re always biased in favour of the woman, Johnny Depp had no chance with the UK courts.

And AH didn't hit the same jackpot? She isn't entitled to a fair judge as well? 🤔

@@kelrogers8480 when did they even say that? You’re putting words into his comment that were not there. It’s quite clear that both sides need a fair judge to get a fair trial. I think this person is alluding to the fact that Johnny lost the trial in the uk, despite amber clearly lying and attempting to manipulate every last part of it, like she has done with this one. Without knowing 100%, it’s easy to assume that the judge wasn’t as fair or unbiased as this one has been. Take your head from out of your arse.

@@craigjohnson9605 I agree and also the fact JD is male which is to a degree still fairly uncommon at trials so will require a fair judge.

That's what you think. Just wait for verdict. If JD wins I guarantee the amount of shit this judge will get is going to be crazy

@@DaniMrtini really?

I really hope they call this a wash. The a.c.l.u. have billed jd 86,000 dollars for providing their statement to the court. How on earth do you bill someone who is called as a witness

@@DaniMrtini What do you mean? Genuine question, does the judge have a say in the verdict after the jury has turned it in? Or do you mean that people will say she was biased if he wins?

You could say that of the editor though.

Is NO ONE in the comment section paying attention to what the judge just DID? Johnny was defamed by the ENTIRE OP-ed, so why is the judge limiting the jury to only consider whether or not the headline is false or defamatory????

@@wms72 good point. Didn’t AH team say the headline was not written by AH?

@@wms72 because question 3 refers to the headline moron, it's not what the 'judge' did. depp's lawyers would not have agreed with the answer the judge gave if the situation was as you falsely interpreted. there's more than 1 count for jury deliberation in the majority of cases, this is count 3 pertaining to the headline only.

She’s a judge. That’s her job. What do you expect?

​@SHRIRAM GUNASEKAR Ahh that explains why AH's lawyers are insisting she didn't write the headline.

hell yeah brother. cheers from iraq.

@@samusaran13372 No one should have to endure this garbage treatment. Amber is mean. Cheers from the U.S.

this court case is not a simple lie, it's a LOT bigger than that. they had a months long, incredibly dangerous relationship. don't write off "everything and everyone". just stay away from people you know are crazy!

If you get falsely accused just throw a load of proof out there. This case had none of that from either side because both are guilty of emotional abuse.

Scc, isn't that the truth. I don't have those funds, so I go down in history as the violator and abuser. I just embrace the fact that this is he'll and there's a place being prepared for me in the next life.

Even if he did, you can't claim sexual and physical abuse with no evidence. It still makes her a liar.

Yes I am agree

it would fall entirely on the jury not necessarily the US law, there are extremely dense people out there but hopefully the jury isn’t so gullible

@Advanced Driving It doesn't matter what "one" believes. This isn't a criminal case, not all the jury needs to agree. This is a civil case, they only need a majority vote to declare a winner, it doesn't require 100% to vote one way. Even the burden of evidence is lower, they only need to believe it's more than likely true one way or another, which is vastly different from criminal. In criminal cases there's additional requirements to help protect from wrongful conviction, with criminal cases the burden of proof must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" and 100% of the jury needs to agree before a verdict. In this, all they need is most of the jury to believe it's more likely than not to be true and they have a verdict. Something else that is vastly different is that in criminal cases there's two trials and two juries. The jury that convicts (or not) and then another sentencing trial with a new jury that decides on punishment. That doesn't happen here for civil, this jury once they decide on a winner then has to sit and also make the decision for damages. So even if a decision for winner is reached quickly, they also need to debate how much an appropriate award will be, they have no restrictions to only give what was asked for. They have to look at the actual damages they think occurred and their value and then decide on additional punitive if they choose to do so. So the jury has a much broader scope of things to discuss. A criminal case the convicting jury doesn't decide on sentencing so that there's less chance of bias carrying over to the sentencing jury who hears an entirely different type of presentation.

Yeah because people get tired of being gaslighted and abused every day and the normal reaction is to get verbally angry back at that person. Especially when you feel there’s nothing else you can do.

She’s correct.

Seriously you are 😅 right. Its great how the US system for justice has inclusion of both parties

Some go to school and learn nothing 😂

a german shepherd!!!!!!! whos a good boy

Nah, she’s annoyed! During the entire trial she’s been dancing around the defence team in stilettos to keep things fair and equitable and after all the patience afforded to them they still can’t even get their laceless sneakers on as quickly as a five year old could do. But on a positive……they had their mic on.

Her body language says otherwise. If I beat you with a stick every day for 10 years at what point does it become normal and not at all an annoyance?

An experienced judge is still a human. She's definitely annoyed there but her experiences help masking her emotions to be fair.

Oh, she's annoyed. She's hiding it very well but her side glares, little smirks, slight shake of her head and tapping the pen are all obvious signs of annoyance or impatience. I'm similar that way, you'll never know I'm annoyed unless you pay attention to little gestures/expressions, so takes one to know one, I guess.

yes. that is the reason for the trial. the op ed and only the op ed and the ramifications of the op ed.

@@linw5302 well, the OP was where she added sexual abuse to her story amplifying her other false claims using both the Washington Post, a so-called “paper of record” and the ACLU to further legitimize those claims too, which obviously led to much more damage to his character and career, as intended. They did a good job demonstrating how her co-opting those organizations to amplify false claims of sexual and physical abuse damaged his career. It’s clearly proven defamation causing damages, so even a guilty verdict acknowledging her defamation would go a long way to restoring him, regardless of what monitory damages or punitive charges they want to add, which the judge said they could also consider, punitive damages to set an example to discourage future false defamations.

she admitted to it, as well. i’m hoping they caught that.

I would have thought by now that the question they raised would have been obvious. Juries make me nervous.

I hope so too. AH keeps saying that she didn't mention Johnny's name in the oped. But think about it who else would she write it about? Was she actually married before she married Johnny?

Yeah. Like the judges who are complicit with the criminal ballot trafficking going on. Willing to look away instead of reviewing the evidence. I wish this judge was sitting over such a case.

Lol is that a reference from the Room 😂

I'd like to write a letter, but don't know where to send it. The court house maybe. The woman has the patience ot a saint. Always calm, always obliging Your Honor, may we approach?) Amazing woman.

I have never seen a judge sitting on the bench be Angry? Or lose it ?

Why no others channel post this? Or I missed it... I'm trying to watch the full version, anyone have the link?

Right 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

They understand but are trying to think of way to lessen the blow. She has claimed sexual assault in the title but there's no proof of that except her statement the broken bottle incident.

@@Thepokerfanboy As a broken bottle I find that offensive!

Oh they understand, it's the people that doesn't understand that they do. It's not positive for them this headline thing, so they are doing their best to redefine the guidelines. They probably also know it will not happen, but maybe they can out-talk, confuse the judge, I mean if there is a 1/1000 of a chance, they will try it.

They can. Wording will fuck you relentless.

Brilliant idea!( Netflix get on this)

@The HaedRockHippie

Same!!!!

She doesn’t seem the type to go for that at ALL

Even just an interview with her about the experience would be interesting. She should feel no pressure though.

Their trying to make it about free speech because Amber said while on the stand ( THATS WHY I WROTE IT IN THE FRIST PLACE ) she admitted she did it with the intention of further harming Johnny .

Also first amendment isn't actual free speech because the first amendment doesn't protect defamation

@@nekogamer2508 Yeah, i'm fully aware, just reporting what her lawyers are basing their defense on

@@nekogamer2508 To be fair he obviously wasn't arguing "defamation should be protected" he is acting as if he believes his client didn't commit defamation. Meanwhile, expanding the definition of what defamation is does harm the first amendment. It's a valid argument it just looks very weird coming from this defense team considering everything else in the trial.

😅 😅

🤜🤛👏👏👏👏

They're going to be known as the worst lawyers ever....puts a smile on my face though.

That and Thank her for her Service since she served in the USMC 🙏🏼💪🏼

Truly!

I've said it on another video but the verdict still does matter, especially for victims who don't have Johnny's star power. Amber winning here means that 1. women will not be seen as abusers even with a fuck ton of evidence, 2. anyone can get away with lying under oath, 3. an abuser can easily get their victim a criminal record or even jail time if they lie and fake cry enough, and most annoyingly, 4. Amber will think she's able to get away with *anything* and will 100% double down on her abusive behaviours If Amber wins, anyone who might've been motivated to step forward and admit they've been abused will probably not do so, because Amber will have proven that pointing at a victim and saying "No actually THEY abused ME, they're a liar, I never abused them" is a winnable statement...

Yeah, even if there's no immediate payoff this has become a zero sum game where one - Johnny - has his future opened wide before him to pursue his career while Amber's future in front of the camera is probably limited to adult film after this trial. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ncWneNZq3Z2rY6s.html

Problem is that this case can fundamentally change relationships because any win for Amber will show how a partner's life can be destroyed with lies. It will probably be called The Amber Factor.

He will lose 100 million dolars, Amber will win the trial and Johnny's money again. I can't endure to watch the unfair situation anymore. I hope Johnny legal team can open a trial about perjury of Amber under the oath. And then Johnny will be a winberin the end of all bullshit. I saw a news, ACLU tried to earn money from the document of Amber's donation, they will sell the documents almost $90.000 to JD's team. It's a disgusting. AH found a lot of liar witnesses, who are arrogant, rude, disturbing people, also she found the disgusting organization to donate Johnny's money. I will ever never give any coins as a donation to ACLU.

My thoughts EXACTLY

She admitted in court that she wrote it about JD.

D: how dare u understand the obvious

Your so slow..the case is defamation... So stick to that... You all know that she's guilty for that case.

@@rexjontiglao2021 The irony is ASTOUNDING. It's all relevant to the case, up to and including the communications the plaintiff had that specifically said "it's about Johnny Depp"

What time is the verdict?

@@nihilistdurden5559 There is no set time. The jury is still deliberating and it will take as long as it takes.

@yo Depp Oooooh I wish. Alas, allergies.

Because entire idea of "the jury" is a joke. Those are ransom people, most likely not so bright, most likely unaware of everything! Literally are not trained to jugde, how the f will they decide now if they couldn't even understood the rules they were given properly? These are bunch of brain dead people if it takes them two whole days + whole 6 weeks of being present during the trial and they STILL have no clue,..this rediculos! It should've been the judge to decide not a bunch of random clueless people! 🤦🏻‍♀️

It could be they are debating damages. Perhaps some jurors want to give JD the full 50, other may want to award less.

The jury may not have only one question. They asked when they deliberated on this evidence.

@@shenglong9818 Has JD been declared the winner?

@@DarkAurora2002 no

I agree because there's a lot of evidence, but since the title only doesn't name him though she was still married to him, they might not find her guilty. Either way, I hope she gets nothing, but the trial itself has shown her to be a liar & possibly an abusive narcissist.

Oh you have me thinking now! 🤔 my train of thought with this question was totally different, as in favour of Johnny. They may have cleared him of the SA as there is absolutely zero evidence but the statement is obviously about him as she testified about SA on the stand! 🤯 as Camille said believe ALL of it or NONE of it! Praying for Johnny 🙏

There's another question that gets into the body of the Op-Ed. This particular question was only in regards to the title. It's so weird to me that there was a question but I'm not in that deliberation room to understand why. It is nerve wrecking but keep thinking positive! 🤞

Not really..... the he has been accused of sexual abuse...... there is no proof what sonever that Johnny Depp sexually abused her...... in fact, there is no proof at all that he abused her in any shape or form. Her alleged sexual abused with a bottle is pathetic, any woman can tell you that, for a start you would 100% know if that bottle was broken or not. This liar couldn't even get that right ffs.

Wrong, this is very favorable to Depp's team.. she retweeted the headline, which means she endorsed it, which means she's also liable for the headline. Also, if they're already on question #3, that means they answered "yes" to #1 and #2, meaning the Jury has already ruled in Depp's favor. Case closed. Depp won.

As every judge should. They're after all being paid handsomely from the public's money.

Yes she certainly does.

im more worried about what was being discussed, doesn't matter about whether she looks annoyed

Truly!

To be fair to them, their job is to represent their client to the best of their ability so, yes, they will always look for a way to benefit their side.

@@totomartin779 Doing that at every chance they find only makes them look even worse. It was a simple answer, after all. The jury already has the case in their hands, so delaying the judge for that reason doesn't make sense.

Isn't that what all lawyers do?

@@markt9614 The jury already have the case and they were working on it for hours. Trying to keep twisting every little thing and delaying the judge is useless. It's a simple answer, yet they keep ruining their own reputations, as if they don't have to find other cases to make a living after this one. Amber's lawyers just don't think...as usual. Well, unless they were aware Amber was watching the livestream and didn't want to set her off again.

​@@markt9614 I don't understand these people. They have a huge hate boner for the lawyers.

first i wasn,t sure but that part at the end??that was nicely veiled sarcasm😏

Nah she was annoyed that they went in on it again. It's the same energy she had when she was about to call lunch only for Rottenborn to approach with a huge binder.

@@nevadanate4957 I don’t really see why this would be about her lawyers trying to manipulate anything. The judge’s clarification on the statement suits their purpose. Regardless of whether AH was abused, she DID speak up about abuse and receive a lot of hate. So … I don’t think there’s any conflict going on here

@@SVTasdfghjkl I didn't say manipulate, I said she got annoyed that they were asking for clarification again. If this helped them I don't see how since the jury said yes to every single question on the verdict for his case. Idk what that last part has to do with anything.

she reminds me of my 5th grade spelling teacher, in looks and personality. understanding, patient but still fair. i loved that woman and think about her almost everyday ❤️ she left a positive lasting impact.

What a great way to describe her, I had one of those teachers! I wish all teachers could have great passion for what they do! I do wonder if this judge had moments thinking to herself about Amber, “girl you are CRAZY and you should be lock away” !! She did keep the chaos away and her demeanor said it all as to who was in charge and in control of that courtroom!

She is a literal legend

This case is indeed bs, but a very famous one too.

She’s a Marine for life much tougher than most so to her this case isn’t BS.

God damn, seriously?

@@yathome5596 Absolutely NO CASE is BS to her!!! NO CASE!!!

Thank you for explaining! I was a little confused what this was about.

@@hmm7355 No worries. Let me know if you have any further questions.

I pray that you know what you're doing.

what a lovely thing to say!

AMEEEN.. And the result will make either Amber and Johnny to look deeper in their heart and make them not to repeat the same mistakes again for gaining better life

Even if everything goes smoothly I pray their names don't get out. People out there are crazy.

If they fuck up, note all their names down

Love it! “I’m not ignoring you, I’m just ignoring you.” I’m using this one for sure.

Okay?

The idea of putting stuff people said in quotes is to do it verbatim. She said, "I'm not ignoring you, but I am kind of ignoring you".

@@takvacs To be fair, you can also put quotes around a paraphrase.

@@rgaud8 ... doesn't that just make paraphrasing look like a quote..? why would anybody do that..?

Is NO ONE in the comment section paying attention to what the judge just DID? Johnny was defamed by the ENTIRE OP-ed, so why is the judge limiting the jury to only consider whether or not the headline is false or defamatory????

@@wms72 Is it just on that one question? The fact that the jury is even asking this question is scary. All Turd's lies override any confusion within those questions. Someone is being a hold out(or more than 1). The ONLY thing that should be holding them up is whether or not to award Johnny money and how much, if anything, should it be.

You’re acting like most judges are out of control and emotional…

@Lil_Cat please explain

@u know me troll

@Hunter Vonnegut never believed Amber when she claimed all of this.

yeah she looks more than happy to clarify things. people make anything up

JUDGE just brought back JUSTICE.. IMPARTIAL, ANALYTICAL, HUMANE, APPROACHABLE, INTELLIGENT, KNOWLEDGEABLE... EVERYTHING A JUDGE SHOULD BE!! Next appointment, Supreme Court!!

Yea, but what about learning quantum physics, organic chemistry and advanced calculus. Lawyers are simply professional Bullsh!tters that play word games. Most know nothing about serious areas of study...

The judge has had several questionable rulings throughout the case that contradict previous rulings. She gets a C+ in terms of competency, but I'd give her an A for demeanor.

She also seems to be able to tell the difference between a man and a woman, unlike our newest “I am not a biologist” judge.

Yes!

@@PlhPatrick ..what's that supposed to mean? That's giving me some really insidious transphobic vibes

@@memeyartist5591 wow! Everyone used to be accused of being racist, now it's transphobic. It is possible for people to understand that men and women are different, while at the same time having respect for people that want to transition to the opposite sex. It's crazy to me that people are comfortable name calling other people only because they have different opinions.

Somehow I'm also afraid they will mess it up for him. However, they've seen her c'mon! They cannot be as daft as not to see all her cruelty, snickering, lies, etc, even if you don't see it on KZfaq or so. Or at least I hope so.

Worst that can happen no one wins their case. Johnny won the public which is probably his number one concern after being accused.

Lets be honest we al enjoyed this trial by having this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gqtnd7aG1K2ncas.html

i am 99% sure of this.....

Absolutely a possibility

Yes

But still....he must win this...

Yes. What's really sad is that there are many women like this that make up stories on an ex partner. They will lie about anything to get their way. How many dad's have been falsely accused of molesting their own child because mom wants full custody with no visitation but all the child support. Because their new partner can't handle the ex still in mom's life. These women spend very little on the child and use child support money for themselves. Happens all the time. How many men falsely accused of battery. The women are automatically believed It's sickening and very rampant. AH never went for medical help? Hmmm . She says she was savaged by a bottle, bleeding. No doctor. But she entertained James Franco the following night. Hmmm. She magically healed?

@@alinamihaela262 The legal requirements for defamation are rather high and difficult to prove. The most likely outcome is that neither JD not AH win their respective lawsuits. The least likely is that they both win (possible but not likely).

I thought so too but he needs to legally clear his name or she’ll just continue

@@anniejuan1817 i don't think it's a win-win situation here...but yeah....it's a difficult trial, but again, not that Impossible tot see the truth

@u know me TROLL alert

Yep

Wait, WHAT!?!?

@@wadewilson8011 Don't you know about the power of stillness? It saved people in Jurassic Park and it can save you, too.

@Hunter Vonnegut that's a lie

@@jedross2136 yeah, I also know the power of grammar. It's started and ended wars. It's the difference between getting hired for a job or getting ignored. It also helps with people not having to guess what someone is trying to say. The power of grammar is HUGE!

@@wadewilson8011 Maybe once their tab wears off they will come back and explain. Edit; Ten hours ago, should be along any minute now.

Thank you for your perfect analogy of her! I was trying to figure her out the whole time. It's been obvious to me several times she has no idea what's going on and is clear she has no business trying to stand up with the big boys!

I think she is 💩 scared of losing because Amber will “lose it” and may give her a couple of black eyes.

Lol

@@the_voice_of_reason and get Elaine's cat to step on a bee, (since she's pussy cat lady)

Lets be honest we al enjoyed this trial by having this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gqtnd7aG1K2ncas.html

lol so much patience that she could become a doctor XD

Lets be honest we al enjoyed this trial by having this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gqtnd7aG1K2ncas.html

Lets be honest we al enjoyed this trial by having this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gqtnd7aG1K2ncas.html

I'm the same. I brook no nonsense from bullshitters or general shit disturbers. I would not have had her patience with "Elaine"...someone needs to mop the floor up with her.

@@InvestmentIdea Be quiet bot!😂

Judges can over rule a jurys finding. Its rare but can and does happen.

@@polygaryd 🎯🎯

Scamber turd team is digging their grave to blackhole

@@USA-wv9eh that sounds like a joke johnny would snicker at. I did.

@@USA-wv9eh My hope is Johnny will win and scamber turd will face some brutal consequences.

Loved every point you've made and I absolutely agree.

Or a mesh vest lol

hahahahaha more holes than a cartoon cheese

Or Amber's lies have been exposed more than a G-String swim suit

She’s annoyed at 2:11 for sure, look again

I sensed a bit of annoyance tbh

You must have to understand physic lecture , that’s it. If you don’t see annoying in that clear example you must repeat the video till you.

Click bait to get you to watch the video.

Clickbait

The jury is back there goofing throwing darts at the Turd’s fake photos, playing cards etc til they think enough time has passed to not look too quick to drop the hammer on Scambuser.

Unfortunately the case has nothing to do with whether she's the abuser, it has to do with the Washington Post article

@@shaylatorch and she admitted she wrote it bc of him. This is taking too long lol

They're probably deciding exactly how much money each party deserves. JD asked for $50M but the jury can give him as much as they want.

@@Ruiluth or as little including nothing.

Apart from Elaine. There's loads of footage where she challenged the judge and also talked over her undermining her authority.

No much respect from A.H. lawyers in the early days with continual questioning of the Judges rulings.

Excellent point!

Well yeah, the world has their eyes on it

I see that with most attorneys..they have respect for the judges

JD's team also had to prove malice, which is hard to prove.

Malice, as they explained in the trial, simply means making a statement knowing it is false. That's all. So not hard to prove in sense it just goes to whether AH is lying or not.

She said JD raped her with a broken wine bottle. She must really have an "Iron Maiden" if she didn't get cuts/lacerations inside her.

Is everyone forgetting the fact she blatantly admitted to writing it “ because of powerful men”

Forgive me, But what was the title again?

@@charlesmason9625 "I spoke up against sexual violence - and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change" She dug her hole.

wait... do u listen to twitter?

@@Vugen18 Did I say that?

She is still looking where to buy that marvelous Amica Cream

@@10zoll And the muffins. Don't forget the muffins:)

@THIS I already have all your receipts! You rolled me 😂👍🍪

In big letters so Elaine can understand it better. Someone had to be at the bottom of the class in law school.

HUH? she doesn't make up her mind about anything. it goes to the jury

@@christopherone1 no shit…. Ashley is saying the judge probably feels herself that Amber is guilty but because it’s not up to her she isn’t taking her personal belief of the case out on Amber or her team.

@@rb3k157 the moron probably doesn't realize the judge doesn't make the final decision.

She does not have a say on the verdict, she is there to apply the courts rules and make decisions regarding the interpretation of some laws and the precedents around them. The jury will decide the verdict and gives a suggestion of the amount.

​@@addicts666 Pretty obvious Ashley is aware of that. She's just saying the judge has not let her feelings on the matter play into how she has dealt with both sides.

The verdict it will take another 6 weeks... LMAO

Better they take their time than to rush a judgement! That would make it seem as though they already had a winner in mind before deliberating

They need that 20 dollars a day paycheck

Possibly because they’re divided which sucks

perhaps the vote is equal for depp and heard so they had to keep deliberating to come to a majority conclusion

Lets be honest we al enjoyed this trial by having this : kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gqtnd7aG1K2ncas.html

Bc was lot of liers, she can get a real penalty by justice to lie under oath

She's a marine after all... She can take it but not being punctual of course.😆

Shes bias she put up with AH lawyers crap yet she was so disrespectful and snarky with Ben and the rest of JD lawyers

Don't be so hard on AHs lawyers. Everyone is entitled to representation, under the law. Even "guilty" people.

Why so

Can you explain why? I really hope you are right!!

Can you explain why? thank you

sorry, can u pls explain?

How brother , please explain , From Norway :)