He is saying »Tell him THAT Jerusalem has come« … your title makes no sence at all

@@bustaroqz It makes sense, what are you going on about???!

@@SwornReaper He is right. We all understand what the title should be saying but it is wrong. Either "That Jerusalem has come" or simply "Jerusalem has come." "The Jerusalem has come" is simply wrong.

@@kennethfharkin Oh "the". For reason I didn't read "the" in my head, but yea "the Jerusalem has come" doesn't sound smooth. I guess that I wasn't very nitpicky when it comes to words.

@@SwornReaper I understand. When I first read it my mind "auto-corrected" it as well.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂omg you rule. Thanks for making my day....

More like "This could've been a DM"

or Whatsapp.

and all of the Seargents - what a fine day to march in the sun boys!! I think we should even march a bit faster, what do you think?! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! I SAID WHAT DO YOU THINK!.....

Best comment ever

What is even more respectfull is that he left with the promise that another person would punish his sisters killer.

@@martinw8062 True. If that promise came from any other Christian, Saladin would have scoffed at it. But he knows that Baldwin's word can be trusted.

@@fencius True, I also think that Saladin had the somewhat same respect for a handful of christians not only the king. Though i think Baldwin had Saladins higest respect.

@@mrmurmur that's why I said "scene," not historical event.

Is it respect tho? It was said in a respectful manner, but it seems more like a confident/stern and intimidating line. I would've been shitting my pants. I havent seen the full movie tho, so I'm judging based off this single scene.

Were these battles THAT HUGE? I mean irl

@@4cegla Yes, movies make historical battles look much smaller than they actually were. The biggest medieval armies could be up to 40000 men or more (salads army was actually 40000 strong). Imagine two full average sized football stadiums standing opposite each other in a field and charging at each other. It is hard to comprehend what that would look like honestly.

@@nathandodson3220 what is most unimaginable is that there weren't many long-range weapons and the whole fight was hand-to-hand combat. surely you could feel the earth tremble under your feet as these armies charged on each other. thanks for your reply

It probably used the software made for LotR Battles, massive.

Get a couple hundred people together, in costumes, a few days of filming them march down a hill over and over again in different styles, composite that together and you have a realistic semi-practical effects army. The real magic, which this scene captures, is making that convey over the screen to the audience. They aren't charging, their approach is slow and methodical, and you can see the rear of the army over the distant hill even as the front approaches.

Likewise, Baldwin was a great king -from a Muslim

those 2 are both LEGENDARY G's in their time till now.... respect is the key to have a peaceful life

As a Hindu, who has no stake in the matters... I too respect Salahuddin - from as much as I know from historical sources. I haven't read up on king Baldwin, but he seems like a decent fellow too.

☪☪🕋🕋

​​@@hs6736?😂😂 🤣 read real history from good authors not from government or movies like this😂😂

As terms have been reached, the term 'assalamu Alaikum' reaffirms the peace by wishing someone you were about to fight; PEACE UNTO YOU(literal translation of Assalamualaikum)

Goosebumps indeed. millions had been slain in one century period. Courtesy between MF leaders doesn't really matter.

@@Maher49 exactly my thought as well!! Stupid wars for a stupid land in my opinion, here we are in the middle east and nothing has changed but the continuous bloodshed in our lands, unfortunately!!

It is more than just an Arabic greeting. It is the Muslim form of "God bless you".

@@nerthus4685 it is Arabic language of saying peace .... indeed God bless you

Didnt even knew it was him until i read the pinned comment :D

Wait--what?!!!!! 😳

He didn’t want his name credited, he wanted it to be mysterious and just have people enjoy it as it’s own thing. Made my respect for him skyrocket as an actor.

seriously, i'd never knew it was him until i saw the credits. he's way too awesome

Wow very cool, didn't know that. Thanks

@@AyoubGhriss the battle of troy is historically well documented.. what are you on about?

@@AyoubGhriss as is the spartan-persian war..

don't forget Gladiator

@@AyoubGhriss you must be very, very smart

@@danilo7218 just was going to write that !

Same here

Your qualities will be known among your enemies, even before you meet them my friend.

สู้ๆ🙋🇷🇺

The Muslims won the war at the end,

@@MOcandyman Is that why they are in charge of Jerusalem right now....oh wait they aren't.

@@odin1185 You're right, the Jews won in the end. Or perhaps no-one won in the end, because it's not worth it.

@@odin1185 history repeat itself, the table will turn and we will get our land back, sit down and wait

@@MOcandyman it's not your land

We have yet to see a portrayal of Cyrus the Great in cinematography...

@@immortaljanus well hollywood has never been one to favor ancient iranian movies.the most we got was darius on oliver stones alexander.hopefully one day a director will grow some balls and make a film about the first major empire and conqueror lol

@Dawud Suleiman what i find interesting is that for all the talk in the west about human rights you would think that cyrus would get more attention from the west considering he was the author of the first declarion of human right laws in history when he decreed for all the slaves in babylon to be freed and that all the people within his realm had the right to practice a religion of their choosing.but oh well

@@Cyrusthegreat87 Why don't your directors make movie on cyrus instead demanding hollywood to make movies? Grow some balls first than demand others about something.

@@gfl1489 guess youre assuming im iranian or from that part of the world.which im not,just like ancient history from that part of the world and a fan of epic films based on those topics.eitherway dont know why you so angry but wish you nothing but the best.

Yep, Baldwin was arguably the best Christian king at that time in the middle-east, he was just and good natured, respected and by his allies and enemies alike and loved by his people, only his mother, brother and the caretaker they bring with them were evil and Baldwin was dying and become way to tired to do anything against them. Learned all this in a book called Misteries of the Knights Templar

*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!

Hebr 1,2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, *by whom also he made the worlds;* as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*

@@TS-zd2ud Is Jesus a god? Did Jesus say I am a god? Does Jesus know the unseen? Does God who created everything need a son? Does the worship of God need a mediator? Do you think that a priest can erase your sins and give you a check of heaven? I hope to guide you to the right path

John 1,1 -3 + 14 confirms the creator of all creation became human! = YHWH! as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*

ya leaders today need to take notes

Saladin wasnt a king, was a SULTAN. The term "king" is common among christians, but more commonly "sultan" or "amir" among Muslims.

It's a nice touch movie wise. In reality (from what I've read), there's no record of Saladin offering to send his physicians to Baldwin IV. He did, however, offer to send his physicians to Richard The Lionheart when he fell ill. So I can see Saladin making the same offer to Baldwin IRL too.

@@retrogamesreloaded At that point in time the Arabians were for more advanced than their European counterparts and the scientific revolution began under muslim rule. The physicians of the Middle East were the greatest in the world by leaps and bounds. They were the only real scientists. An offering to send the worlds greatest physicians when hardly any existed anywhere else is worth a mountain of gold. It really shows the character of the Christian King and the respect he commanded even tho he was physically fraile.

@@retrogamesreloaded if I recall he sent fruit to Richard when he caught scurvy. So I’d agree even if it isn’t recorded it doesn’t seem to be out of character.

That’s what Warriors are

@@mittromney417 These days, where dishonorable and shady dealings carry no consequences and your people will celebrate you as a champion for tricking someone into trusting you? Nah. But you can ask your question to Richard the Lionheart should you ever get to meet him in the next life, and see what he has to say.

Jerusalem bring choir team along with them too

"The Jerusalem has come...". Liguistically, it's a perfect adaptation of Arabic vernacular.

yeah that line gives me chills

Yep, then Ridley threw away an opportunity for a spiritual sequel for KoH by casting Russell Crow as Robin Hood instead of Orlando Bloom. Kingdom of Heaven could have flowed flawlessly into that film (although he would've been a French Robin Hood, I guess).

Jerusalem is Everything....

Nice catch!

wow

Saladin and Baldwin were good men how didn't want war. They both brought their families out with them to Jerusalam and both their sisters paid of all people paid the price. But how is it two of the most powerful people in the world - pay for what a bunch of nobody peasants did to a blacksmiths wife? Since in the end, only Balian of Ibelin got any say in the matter.

@@TS-zd2ud This is where Muslim's and Christian's got out names for each other. 1. Heretic's because Muslim's say Christ didn't die on the cross - that God took his place and it only seemed like he died. 2. Christ is ever-living and will return. 3. Infidel's because Christian's have associated God Father of Mankind with Christ his servant. Everyone should be more afraid of number 2. They wouldn't be so concerned with 1 and 3... 💀

*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!

what is the difference? I heard it's super good

@@roland2864 I've only seen the director's cut, but I know that it's 40min longer than the cinema version. I've heard that the cinema version focuses more on Balian's character, whereas the director's cut paints a larger picture, and fleshes out his arc a lot more.

Glad you wrote that! It's insane: While the Cinema / TV cut seems to not even be a good movie, the Director's Cut is one of the best movies I've ever seen (even if it's historically not THAT correct). That shows so much how a longer movie with the complete story told makes a huge, huge difference. Also the reason why I think that the final Netflix cut of "Outlaw King" with it's 117 minutes could have been much better due to the fact that the original movie was a lot longer, but Mackenzie cut it a lot more than initially planned - a last time for another 20 minutes, after he showed it in Toronto at the Film Festival. His first cut was more than 4 hours (240 minutes) long and since they released some of the deleted scenes, you get an idea how much better the movie with all that scenes would have been. I'd love if nowadays directors like Mackenzie would later just release a Director's Cut or Extended Cut like it used to be 15-40 years ago (f.e. "Kingdom of Heaven").

@@sonatine3266 what is the name of the movie 🙏

@@istapic4356 As mentioned "Outlaw King". ;)

🤣🤣

Two words for you: Green screen

this was mostly filmed in Morocco...lots of cheap extras here.

Ridley Scott: you can’t count that high....

I love this type of comment 🤣🤣😂

U didn't just praise the visual effects after watching this scene... This has one of the worst looking green screen effects I've seen, like pick another scene to comment this under lmaoo

@@worldsea6622 he's praising the acting skill you damp piece of cardboard.

@@PyrrhusBrin "The music, acting, visual effects, writing and the overall badassery this clip shows" Love it when an illiterate calls me a cardboard.

Not JUST the acting skills learn to read

@@worldsea6622 wtf are you crying about? Some people just NEED to hate for whatever reason just because their own personal lives suck and want to make everyone else feel like them. Get help.

نعم تحليلك صحيح

Actually I think Saladin is simply strictly applying Quranic rules of engagement here. If the enemy sues for peace, then we are ordered to accept peace Quran 8:61. During Prophet Mohammed's life, he accepted terms of peace with his enemies even though it was clearly unfavourable for him and his companions and very favourable for his enemies (treaty of hudiaybiyyah). But, peace is peace.

@@Omar-kw5ui Also Saladin respects him, Baldwin is the one who as a boy of 16 years defeated him in battle.

Excellent, excellent analysis and you're absolutely right. Later in the film he states his reasoning for withdrawing was for strategic purposes, which is likely true. But on a deeper level he understood fully that the king before him has no qualms whatsoever with dying, considering he was already mostly dead. Baldwin the IV and Salah ad-Dinn by all account were such men, who likely have shown each other similarl courtesies.

It’s bias to the crusaders since it’s a western movie.. Feels sad seeing ppl depending on movies and not on real historical records.. There’s no comparison between the two leaders! One is a great leader who eradicated injustice and the invasion in his land, and he is known for his tolerance when he gave amnesty to his enemies after defeating them.. And the other leader is a murderer, thief who causes mischief in the lands and gets defeated..

wonder what they did with all their poop

@@bingbong2257 They won't. Their guts will get out of their belly soon, if the battle happens, they know it

@@andy_NQ so what you're saying is that they pooped really quickly like all at the same time

Watch War and Peace, they had more troops than this and they were all real extras

It does look spectacular but tbh, this wasn't a meaningful military formation, just a horde of men and horses. Military formations were used for a reason.

Love your enemies

Only a fair gesture seeing as the conversation was held in the Christian King's language

@@tireachan6178 I distinctly heard the conversation taking place in Modern English. I wonder what King Baldwin IV's language was. Middle French?

@@andrewg.carvill4596 Old French would have been his native language as a Frankish Nobleman. He likely spoke Latin too, and had a good grasp of Arabic and Greek also.

this is why we need a King and not politicians!!!

Never knew it was Edward Norton under there after all the times I watched this movie. I would always say to myself, man whoever plays the King is a real good actor lol.

@@Skizzy461 muhahahah same LOL But we all know he is a great actor but also a diva xD

@@SpriGgEx Diva? Oo

@@jollyquinn430 he is known for causing issues backstage. But agreed he is a fantastic actor otherwise.

@@jollyquinn430 Norton is known to be one of the most troublesome guys to work with. Hes not only a male diva but also a control freak. With how hollywood is right now depending on the production i dont even think thats ultimately a bad thing, as how shitty some Regisseurs and Screenwriters are. A very good and experienced actor could maybe force some changes for the better. But i dont know how much control he tries to take over and if its always for the better of the film or just for his own role.

Also watch the director's cut if you do watch it. Its the difference between an excellent movie and an average one.

i mean, great actors, great soundtrack, great director, great topic and one of the best story moment for me

Amazing movie apart from the fact they portrayed The Knights Templar as the antagonists

Also watch Ertugal series

Yes, watch the directors cut which is much better as it fills in plot points and character development. And if you ever watch Alexander make sure it’s the definitive cut. Again much better constructed and development of character and plot.

this is from 2005. because nowadays cinema sucks.

Childhood favourites???!!!..... i kind of hate you now 😄

back then people know how to shoot from bow. in real life. 2021: ONLY green screen because why to make long fighting scene. people could act bad, long action or just get sick. better give it to photoshop dude and he solo can do it kiiiiinda good.

Lord of the rings is better than The Hobbit trilogy for this reason in my eyes lol.

Guys, HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

That extended edition is really good.

Yeah the theater version left a lot of holes when watching.

Knights tale, Arn... had watched and re-watched in child days mmm.

The Theatrical Release is an unwatchable mess. The Directors Cut is one of the greatest films ever made.

Directors cut is a completely different movie and makes sense. Too much removed from the original still a good movie though but after seeing the directors cut there is no comparison.

Took me a while before I realized you were making a MP reference 😂

"Tis just a blemmish"

P. Burns Do you suggest that coconuts migrate?

Not at all! They could be carried. 🥥🌴 🕊

Well that mean the Black Knight still alive and “kicking”

there was a tornado, just out of view

The many-named god blows each to their charges favour.

hahah well spotted

this is how you finish when you do everything in movies practical. ???

It was foreshadowing

Because they are one in the same. Read all the texts. They are all going to fight the anti christ or al-Dajjal in the end, together.

@@kylejohnson6070 OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN

@@wallclock4648 You ANTI- CHRIST lover 🤮

I've just watched it because of this comment, glad I did thank you.

@@wallclock4648 The Prophets. Are one in the same.

name please?

Well said.

Probably because Ridley Scott had as usual he does make deep dive into his films(have twists or second meanings not flat with first watch noticed) and hire arab/muslim historians who helped him. btw I have questions: does often cristian and muslim army leaders marched with they armies not ready to fight? and what really interests me: does musulmanians often sad this to cristian army leaders? if you don't know for sure you can tell your opinion if you have strong believe in truth. You noticed it right but I can say why Saladin did what he did. He know that they armies was equal in strength and he respected cristian general as he was equal to him and even defeated Saladin in his young ages . So why to fight good leader when can wait and win fool leader(spoler)? Maybe this even made him send his doctors (of course mostly for good). And I really believe that Saladin was on adrenaline rush and anger after defeating cavalry attack to start besiege and deal with Rene'd Shateljon when saw cristians, thats why he was furious and made his horse do these 360*, but his fast thinking saved his man lives and what made him great and allowed to conquer Jerusalem. what Ridley and actor nicely showed.

@@Handconnonierr Salah al-Din's mistake was not to exterminate you when he liberated Jerusalem

@@riyadmaherz2608 cristians didn't want to fight for it as it was not cost effective to send thousands to fight on equal with thousands who live there(better armor vs humans who live there+ horse/camel archery) . Too far away and too less to have, and because what we see in movie there was good terms to withrow(safe escape with honor and free to enter city to pray, questinable but possible) His goal was the city so he took it with little blood instead of famous battle where cristians probably should send another armies as they were defeated (but instead it was more like peace treaty walk away). So why it was a mistake? to besiege city and have stronger version of ''attempt to conquer or Malta''. Remember Ottoman Empire had apprehend on water to several countries; where I doubt that Saladin had anything even close (and you can even pick one, when they all could send they fleets) to Venece, Jenova(Jenove war ships sighted in Age of Empires 2). So you think very short handed and if you would Saladin you woudn't hold Jerusalem (as its kinda easy to take champion cup, but its much harder to hold). Real Saladin conquered and holded it. Think about this.

This might be a reason in a movie. But in real life, Muslims are not allowed to say Salaam to non muslims/disbelievers. Greeting a non-Muslim first is haraam and is not permitted, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do not initiate the greeting with the Jews and Christians, and if you meet them in the street push them towards the narrowest part of it.” But if they greet us we have to respond to them, because of the general meaning of the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or (at least) return it equally” [al-Nisa’ 4:86] The Jews used to greet the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) by saying, “Al-saam ‘alaykum ya Muhammad (Death be upon you, O Muhammad),” praying that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) would die. So the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The Jews say ‘al-saam ‘alaykum (death be upon you),’ so if they greet you, then say, ‘Wa ‘alaykum (and also upon you).’” If a non-Muslim greets a Muslim by saying “al-saamu ‘alaykum,” then we should respond by saying “wa ‘alaykum (and also upon you).” The fact that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said “wa ‘alaykum” indicates that if they were saying “al-salaamu ‘alaykum (peace be upon you),” then peace will also be upon them, i.e., whatever they say to us, we say to them. Hence some of the scholars said that if a Jew, Christian or other non-Muslim clearly says “al-salaamu ‘alaykum,” it is permissible for us to say “ ‘alaykum al-salaam (upon you be peace).” Similarly it is not permissible to initiate a greeting such as Ahlan wa sahlan (welcome) and the like, because that is a kind of honouring them. But if they say something like that to us, then we should say something similar to them, because the greeting should be returned in like manner and each person should be given his due. It is well known that the Muslims are higher in status before Allaah, so they should not humiliate themselves in front of non-Muslims by greeting them first. So, in conclusion, it is not permissible for us to greet non-Muslims first, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade that, and because this is a humiliation for the Muslim when he starts to honour a non-Muslim. The Muslim is higher in status before Allaah, so he should not humiliate himself in this manner. But if we are greeted then we should return the greeting in similar terms. Similarly it is not permissible for us to greet them first with words such as Ahlan wa sahlan (welcome), Marhaban (hello) and so on, because that is a kind of honouring them, so it is like initiating the greeting of salaams with them. Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 3/33. If there is a need to greet a kaafir first, there is no sin in that, but it should be something other than the greeting of salaam, such as saying Ahlan wa sahlan or How are you, etc. In that case the greeting is for a reason, not to honour him. See al-Mawsoo’ah al-Fiqhiyyah, 25/168. Ibn al-Qayyim (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Zaad al-Ma’aad (2/424), concerning greeting a kaafir first: A group of scholars said: It is permissible to greet him first if that serves a purpose, or for fear of his harm, or because of blood ties, or for a reason that requires that. And Allaah knows best.

You know films are fake right?

@@hammiehamster9933 people are dumb they think what in films are where like real… like wtf

@@hammiehamster9933 They were real people though, and Salahuddin was said to be like that irl as well.

@@hammiehamster9933 if i not mistake, this movie take from the real history.. And we know most character in that movie is real.. Especially for salahuddin, the conquerors 2/3 or earth..

​@@hammiehamster9933 go read a history book

I am just going to throw this out there, Baldwin had to learn to ride his horse with his knees. He leans back a lot while riding which may seem intimidating, but in all reality he is so weak he can barely hold himself up on the saddle.

THIS. Shivers and tears, although I can't fathom why exactly. I've just as much respect for Salah ad-Din as I have for Baldwin, but this is awe-inspiring no matter which side you're on.

You didn’t learn nothing from the movie! The Crusades were a shame .

lol

@@OANNAAS The crusades were a product of the times. It is only a shame when you have contempt for matters of antiquity. There is no shame in history. Only the hubris and arrogance of those who think they know more than the ones upon whose shoulders they now stand on.

The Golden Cross ended up as Spoils of war for the Muslims, i believe King Richard asked for it and Salahuddin gave it, cause Muslims had no belief or interest in the so called Christian Artifact.

Saladdin comes across as an intellectual who doesnt let his religious views turn him into a fanatic. That is probably why he won all those victories against western armies.

@@dudsulugulugan7639 But that's thing my friend, he follow the teachings of Islam and speaking as a Muslim myself that's how we follow the example of Prophet Muhammad PBUH mannerism and humbleness

@@redhakiim789 He comes across as a pragmatist instead of an ideological fanatic. Then again Egyptians have always been a race apart from their arabian brothers as Egyptians have always been more cosmopolitan.

@@dudsulugulugan7639 But teenage Baldwin 4 defeated him in all battles even when he is at end stage of leprosy

@@Vladklx It goes to show that after baldwin, the strategists of the west have declined.

I'm lucky enough to watch this movie extended cut on KZfaq before it was taken down and yes .. director's cut>>> theatrical

It seems the new Dune movie ripped off the audio track and amplified the bass.

Yes, this film was always pretty underrated, sadly.

Where can I download this movie please please

@@alhassanceesay5229 purchase it, properly.

Who composed it? Dead Can Dance?

Troy!! One of my all time favs

What did he even mean by that?

@@Design--om2zx It was a gesture of friendship and respect between the two leaders. Sultan Saladin sent his doctors to help King Baldwin IV, who was suffering from leprosy, an incurable infection that affected the nerves, skin and eyes, causing disfigurement and deformities.

@@guilhermeramos4969 ah, thank you. Now I get it

@@Design--om2zx What Guilherme Ramos said is true in general, however in this specific scene what has been said is due to the fact that Salahiddin saw tiredness, exhaustion in the eyes and posture of his opponent. Thus as good gesture, he offered his doctors. If you rewatch and pay attention to it, you may witness it.

@@guilhermeramos4969 the following scene can prove my point: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/epunjbafs6uwdX0.html

I think the movie suffered from an "Orly" hangover of sorts, to your point. Audiences had seen him four years running in more or less the same role (LoTR, Troy). At first blush, this just seemed like another typecast action film with Orlando Bloom's pretty face plastered over it, and in fairness, that's how it was marketed in the US. Really a shame, when the underlying film is incredibly complex and beautifully acted and shot.

To be fair, "Troy" was a shit script and Bloom did get to play opposite Brad Pitt at the height of his mega-stardom. But anyone who takes film seriously can't watch an american actor simulating a british accent playing a Greek God WTF

Agreed!

Between Baldwin*

@@shonen-seinenotaku3503 Thank you.

And salah aldin destroyed the Christian army,muslims are too powerful 🏳️🏴

@@Lxzaa you mean defeat a Christian army that's fatigue, dehydrated and under a idot king. If the winged hussars were there yep someone's going home defeated.

@@Chris-ub7no lel and if the turks with their jannissarys would be there…. We can continue thish to midnight. No one is superior then other one. It is the manner and for which price we are ready to go for something. As turks hold al quds (jerusalem) for almost 400 years amd not 1 christian or other religion could take it until today. Israel is a state, backed up by the strongest military power in the earth. And yet they cant own all of al quds. :)

Have u seen Indian PM

Now a days you can push a button and never have to meet.

@kamil S Why do people like you feel the need to call people plebs in the comment section!!!!! I hope your life improves my friend!!!!

@kamil S na chuj się prujesz

@@funnyvideosbgmi What about the indian pm?

yep that is actually surprising and shocking at the same time. Imagine that outside the movies soldiers went to battles like this knowing they would certainly die.

Also kings fought their own battles with the soldiers to boost their morale, interesting times.

If you want truly epic scale, the 1980 Napoleon movie used something like 17000 Ukrainian Soviet soldiers to portray the great battles and proper square formations.

@@Pantsinabucket Can't wait for the Napoleon Movie that Ridley Scott is directing.

Now a days we use drones :/

only in movie

Oh thats what he said? I always heard "Positions".

@@Aechellies Try reading real history, there was a lot of chivalry between Saladin and Baldwin, as well as Saladin and Richard.

@@Aechellies read some books, Salaheddine sent his own physician, who was a Jew, to treat the Christian king. Thats the beautiful harmony. Your hindu/sikh pundits cant bare the sight of that, I know😂

@@secandar oh yes your so called harmony also included the Christian women's who were made slaves by Saladin when the city fell. Hindu and Sikh have no interest here we all know which religion still blow itself up to make a point

Islam commands me to respect every human being, even if he is an enemy like the Crusaders

*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!

Hebr 1,2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, *by whom also he made the worlds;* as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*

Because he was true Muslim

He was a great military General. Only bested by Richard the Lion heart in my humble opinion

​@@ikhan10 what is a true muslim, a conqueror ?

@@ikhan10 No, because he was a great man first. You realize that there have been inspiring men and women, of all races, nationalities and creeds? Atheists, Muslims, Christians, Jewish... Their moral stances/personal journeys/scientific minds/heroic acts/artistic expressions...Their contributions made them respected, not their religious affiliation...🤔

@@ikhan10 I believe, there is no such thing as a true Muslim. Religions are designed in such a way that they can be used for any type of agenda. Islam is no exception.

I did that, and I noticed a painted stick in the ground for the cavalry to stop behind xD

No but I did read your comment again and was amazed at the amount of time, effort and deliberation to “induce” such a pretentious comment. Congrats 🥳

the scene of the armies arriving one the best visually in this kind of movies, the flags waving really gives another imersion

@@oskargoingplaces5720 they akschually used those to measure throwing distances for catapults on city/castle walls

Yes i saw the rope and stick on the ground where the Salah al-Din's army stopped.

Mine would be "I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of God. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers."

@@TheCollegeofNerds people screaming allahuakbar before they doing suicide bombers

@@TheCollegeofNerds Bravoooo!!👏👏👌🔥🔥❤

@@TheCollegeofNerdsand then you'd be struck down where you stand.

@@TheCollegeofNerds u think ur wise but ur not

Not according to history.

Georgen flag

Yes! That's why I hate modern wars were the leaders always stay hidden behind!

its just the hollywood scenes

@@andrewmakenzi *There were leaders who rode and fought with their men. But mostly on the side/with a cavalry charge and doing a hammer and anvil strat.*

@@GGdeTOURS37 *The stages of war have progressed from iron and spears to lead and ballistic missiles. And a general's experience is much more valuable than a soldier's. But to see your general going out with his fire arm and pistol, waving for you and your comrades to follow him as they take the position must be, at the very least, awe inspiring.*

@@SCP--fj2jr yeah true. but hollywood has a way of adding emotion to the story that was not really there. they have a way to 'paint' the picture that is not really factual but kindah factual.

Been itching to watch it again now I'm older. I'm with you on this one during the weekend👊🏼

Make sure it is the directors cut. Almost two different movies. The directors cut is the only way to watch Kingdom of Heaven.

I don't think any army outside of China at the time could approach even 100k in the field. Its more likely that these armies maxed out at 20k and that was already pushing it. Here it looks like at least 50k each. Maybe more.

Where can I find the directors cut?

The look on his face when he notices the weariness of king Baldwin and offers his physicians is great. So much conveyed.

Where did you watched director's cut? I have been looking for it since long time.

@@sanc2990 It's on KZfaq. someone uploaded it. its pretty good quality

@@HumzahizationBro I searched but couldn't find it. Can you paste the link here ?

@@sanc2990 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n8pzl7KiytqUqKs.html

What?

What do you mean?

That's osm

@@HAmzakhan2 He means we won't see a real picture of him in his private life.

@@HAmzakhan2 sounds like he is a method actor

Oh no, that's were your wrong. These were nothing in comparison to what is coming. Revelation will come.

he offered his physicians for the king as a sign of respect cause king wished him to retire back unharmed!! pay attention

@@mdl7534 you pay attention. Both king brought their entire army. It would have been an even match. Your "unharmed" comment is irrelevant on the argument. The christian king promised that the culprit Reynald will be punished. It was mutual respect that made saladin pulled back his army. It was not because of the unharmed comment. He offered his doctors because he saw that the travel from Jerusalem to Kerak put a heavy toll on the Christian King's health. He was dying. That offer was also because of mutual respect. YOU PAY ATTENTION.

@@Dylon1981 nice comeback. people are too dumb these days.

@@Dylon1981 okay spaz.

@@Dylon1981 It would not have been even. Saladin's army was far larger, but the losses wasn't worth it for him. The physicians were indeed only being sent to aid the king, as he suffers from leprosy.

Her freckles are sexy. :D

@@immortaljanus She's sexier in 300 part 2. wink wink

🤣😆

"It's our country, you bastards!" "Did you bring a flag?" ~ Eddie Izzard

-HOW MANY FLAGS - YES

his inspiration was prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) who gave all his wealth to the poor and died without having a single gold coin in his posession. also he forgave most of his enemies who tortured him and his people when he returned to Mekka with 10.000 men.

@@JesusIstMuslim much like a muslim family whom i used to live just round the corner from, the father was a very generous sort of bloke. i was out for a walk one afternoon, walked past his house, he was doing some gardening, we got talking. one thing i learned very quickly, dont mention ISIS in front of him, they made him extremely angry.

Babbling of middle easterners praising their leaders , you know there is something called al-dawla al-ayubia (the ayyubid nation) inherited to saladin's sons by him

@zenoarior who are dogs of jahanam? IS isnt khawarij.

@zenoarior prove they are khawarij?