And drags his best friend into it on his best friend's wedding day AND drags his wife's friend into it to discover her body. Dude totally deserved the death penalty. People mean nothing to him, he manipulates them to do his bidding.

What a complete loser. He thought he was some kind of gangster but in reality he's a complete wimp.​@@xrisku

He’s probably just drawing dirty pictures because everyone seems to describe him as a pervert or creep.

I thought he was a Brit! He's such a nice sounding guy! So professional and composed!

London accent

@@halimak625 My partner is from London and the detective sounds nothing like him or anyone else I've met down there

@@karensanders8061 london has variety of accents

I laughed out loud at that!! Like what?!?

I'm surprised the judge didn't blatantly tell the defense lawyer to shut up! He has more patience than I would have.

Lol!

I think it’s so when they file an appeal they have a bunch of objections over-ruled. It’s like guessing & hoping one is correct.

🤪🤔

Who. Did u call ugly?

Called hurrass and I over powered ... With a report

Absolutely

Agreed, his accent confuses me though.. ifeel like he grew up in South Africa then spent his adult life living between UK and Australia 😆

@@mycatisjudgingyou800 no it’s a very British accent. No ugly Australian accent there or the more present South African accent.

Linda Nicola! I agree he is brilliant and so professional. I would want him on my side!

@@cawiltu Standard British accent probably from the south of England like me. He has probably lived in the states a while so he has a slight twang. He has a neutral London accent. Possibly north London lol

@@mycatisjudgingyou800 I agree

I agree! He must get paid on commission. I can just imagine it, "Oh sorry Joe, you didn't give enough objections today!" Dumbasses!

..giggle

Every violation of the rules of evidence must be objected to or is deemed waived. Objections made- but improperly ruled upon by the judge creates a potentially VALID REASON for appealing an eventual conviction. I understand its "annoying" but the defense attorney is making an appellate record so....just doing his job.

@@tinameyer7080 why does he feel this evidence violates the rules of evidence? Maybe I missed this?

@@mindymiljour4672 He has made different objections. Lack of foundation-means that the proper foundation has not been made that supports asking the particular question. Hearsay means that a person is testifying to what someone else said- not themselves. Leading means that the lawyer is presenting facts in his question that have not been previously attested to designed to get a predetermined answer. Argumentative means the lawyer is no longer just asking questions to get to the facts-but is essentially arguing with the witness testimony. Asked and answered is when a lawyer asks the same question multiple times which is a harassment to the witness. Requiring a void dire of a witness occurs when they are testifying as an "expert"- their qualifications must be in the record or they are not allowed to share their "expert" opinion. There are several other objections as well- but you should get the gist by this explanation. Have a great day.

@@tinameyer7080 Yes, but he's just winging them. At this point he's just trying to throw something and see if it sticks. Also, the constant interruption cofuses the jury and massively slows the course of the trial.

Miss Star, We all got a strong accent here on youtube so Ima gonna half ta ask ya ta please 6:23 slow down 10-4 so that you can understand us;^D. Sincerely, Just Sum Lucky Sham Rock passin' out free Q-Tips

Of course. His narcissism is loving all the attention, even if it's negative.

Wakk yo you in so code in pras un to do saulgarcia greenwood2850 thruu poli alixx for the 1000/000/00/ for llaw folln2p33 ralie fosr you code 10111636 Tha talk corpuschristy the suelta la sopa forow 1020 holliwoodstarg

Corpuschristy saulgarcia yo by Christy a axtin ti code by ST jll for rascador a saulgarciia101636 5*5 numarSM 80puthe providencia hourrto makie pay pictura i by i'll gill suelta lasopa justos the

Comansaria complait wo for elegible for Herrera for poli acendd for un principio configuraciónsaulgarcia greenwiid2850amnda for law complait for sing craff nevo testify Gracie si saulgarcia go hours for sunmr ni deysy

@@saulsegura7659 WTF?

Defence counsel doesn't even know what hearsay is. Bawahahaha

Laughing All The Way yes I noticed that! It almost looked like he was modeling, touching his tie and opening his blazer. He's like, I'm here, it's me. Craziness.....😮

November 2022 and I came here to check for comments like this! I think he thinks he is his lawyer…bloody joker

Objection: *their

@@j-davis7290 they’re = they are. Their = belonging to them

@@j-davis7290 they’re = they are. Their = belonging to them

@@Writingxx thank you for incorrecting me.

​@@j-davis7290I'm a Grammar Nazi too...giggle

Lol

So THAT'S it! THANK YOU!! 😄

A new drinking game!!

denkat2010 do you think they will be in the same general population in prison?

Ikr.....ugh

Florida is a big tourist destination for people in the UK, and also to live there, it's mainly the weather and the beaches that draw them.

​@@TheLeadSledThank you. I didn't know that...😊😊

@Ashley Wright I always wondered what in the world they were constantly writing! 👍

Tic. Tac. Toe.

Did notice during his mother’s interrogation that she was taking notes! I thought that was so odd

“you” sorry missed

Yeah, they're brothers from an "other" mother...

Crystal that’s prob why he hired him

Yeah, that judge would be like, "SIT DOWN AND BE QUIET!!"

Which judge are you referring to?? Now I'm curious!!

Sabrina Limon was also constantly writing at her trial. She was also convicted of conspiring to kill her husband. Hmmmmm, strange.

Connie P. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👍

At least 85% of all defendants spend their trials feverishly writing. I think defense attorneys tell their clients it’s better to take notes or look busy than be caught staring unemotionally at gruesome pics, making an inappropriate facial expression during testimony etc etc.

I shall not look up over and over again lol

He’s not a Dr. His wife was

OMGGG "all your eggheads in one basket" 😩😩😩😩

OMG I THOUGHT THE SAME!!! LOL

Tweedledee & Tweedledum🤣🤣

He clearly only trusts his mirror image.

As well as Wright Triplets!

Tommie Miller it’s the solicitor not the defendant, they really look alike

That's what I thought at first, but then I matched it to his tie (on more than one day). It's actually Sievers going up with his attorneys.

Tommie Miller wow realty, how odd!! But then there is something odd about him

Tommie Miller, I saw the same comment ask during Jimmy Rodgers trial, as he approached during all side bars as well. Someone stated there is a law in Florida that allows defendants to approach for side bars. I don’t know the laws, but I hope this helps a bit.

@@JabberJawz. yes Florida law allows this to happen

I'm guessing he borrowed an idea outta Jodi Aries' defense strategy: tryin to soften that hardened criminal look with glasses. It didn't work for her and it isn't working for him.

He has worn glasses since at least High School when I first met him. You should be quiet about things that you know nothing about.

Joe Ehart yes sir!! Not nice either to curtail free chat with a “be quiet”...I do agree with your comment though...have a nice day!

Joe Ehart what was he like in high school?

Free speech is what’s great about our country. This is Not North Korea or China. Hence why Teresa is free to state her theory about the defendant’s eye glasses.

people do it in Church now,too. casual world.

It’s only practical-when you have to spend 8-12 hours in a room a day, Plus, I don’t see anyone opening up a Big Mac & Fries? As someone who’s blood sugar often crashes, I frequently have to eat a handful of nuts-regardless of where I am.

She's one of those people who always looks like they're smiling...even when given the worst news in the world.

I thought the same thing!! Thankfully she's not being shown quite as much on video during this trial (so far anyways). And I believe, or at least hope, her superiors had a stern chat with her after her testimony during last trial, because it's not nearly as extreme this time. This is a MURDER trial, laughing, giggling and smiling should not be a part of any of this. So unprofessional and disrespectful.

Speed up playback, less annoying

Silence in the _ court nothing wrong with this witness

She's so creepy. I skip thru her testimony so I don't have to see her stupid smile while talking about a woman who's head was bashed in.

I was genuinely wondering what your comment was about, but yeah, I see it. she’s back

Possibly for the children?

Dignity. She was killed with a hammer, and the crime scene is much more horrific than a stabbing.

I find it surprising when they DO show crime scene photos - especially in murder cases.

Dignity? Nah. But I have noticed the same thing. Alot of these cases I had to Google the crime scene photos, ever since the Chandler Halderson case.

Non responsive means that the witness is giving an answer that’s not directly related or relevant to the question

@@Kira_Terpsichore Yup

😂

Mark is writing his will. And...a request to share a jail cell with his best friend of all time Curtis Wayne Wright to whom he owes so much.

@JusticeAA yes they do because if they stare at the jurors it could be that like he's intimidating them it's not too bright his defense attorney is doing the best he can with his guilty client happens every day in America and bastards like them walk out they usually have to kill two or three people

Yes, he is keeping himself occupied, trying to look invested, intelligent, the wronged. He’s probably writing his lines.... I must not kill my wife I must not kill....

They all seem to do that so think it’s something they are told to do b their lawyers

​@@denkat2010😂😊😂

SH.............. LOL

It's a poker game distraction way of trying to make the prosecuting attorney lose concentration.

Jaime Ugaz exactly lol

Defense attorney (farts in court and everyone hears it) OBJECTION!! HEARSAY!!

They are both trying to suppress laughter at how STUPID someone would have to not know what the word meant, and for them to think the word is "medical lingo", as the attorney put it.

Exactly Mr. E. He could have sued her for half of the trust fund and walked away. It would have taken a while to get through the courts if she objected but he would have likely been afforded this money since they have a king term marriage. They built up their wealth over the course of their marriage. I’m not sure if she had money prior to the marriage but either way the trust was substantial. He would be living it up free while his wife could live her life with her children. What a sad tragedy.

Marc Baetans they are literally in a playlist in order FFS. What more do you want.

There is no need to be rude I am new to watching trials on here too so where do we find the playlists?

@@debbieblythe3491 literally search "Mark Sievers trial" and click the VERY FIRST search result.

plan was murder and make it look like a robbery, that is why he used a pry bar on the door.

Irish? Southern English accent. I'd guess around Kent.

I'd say he's English, but he pronounces the odd word with a very slight Australian/NZ or South African accent!

@@nat11911 I'm English he definitely has a southern English accent. Not London but not too far away. I live in North West England now but I'm from the London area.

@@jeanettcanham9059 I'm from the NW (near Lancaster), but I lived in London (Clapham, Stockwell, Brixton) and the South (Kingston, Shepperton) for a number of years- small world. I can still hear the odd bit of Antipodean and SA though, unless my hearing's going.

@@nat11911 I thought the same initially but 99% was southern accent. Maybe his accent has morphed some over his years in the states? I'm halfway between Leeds and Manchester. Very small world.

😂😂 This is so accurate.

😂😂😂😂

He’s such a sociopath. I can’t believe he killed this beautiful successful phenomenon woman. Obviously he wanted the money but he could have just divorced her and sued her for 1/2 of the trust fund. He would be living high on the hog with the money from the trust and would never have to work again. Plus, the poor children would still have their mother. I really am stunned he organized this heinous crime.

The clerk doesn’t show evidence to the jury, especially when medical evidence is being attested to. The photos were obviously deemed too graphic to show the jury and audience on a projection system, especially in consideration of the victim’s family. I’m actually glad the medical examiner handled the photos as he was asked to do, bc I would surely hate for the horribly graphic photos to be made public....thank God they weren’t shown!

Exactly!!! If I was guilty or not, I'd wanna convince the jury in every way possible....and writing profusely without eye contact is not one of the ways to go! 😎

The kind that lure you in and murder you while showing you the house

Every courts rules are a bit different. Many judges will allow audience members to have their cells, as long as they’re not trying to take pics etc.

He's southern English with some Aussie twang in there, just notice with some of his words he uses. I'm English too but he has a southern accent I have a Northern, big difference.

He’s got a south london accent. He’s definitely no Aussie :)

He's from UK standard London accent

she did this last trial also...I don't understand why she smiles...don't get it...

I think she feels grand up there, she’s certainly trying to show her best self. She’s a wannabe police officer after all

People react differently under pressure.This was a high profile case and Americans are weird about being on tv.

@@maureens100 maybe it’s nerves

Nerves🤷‍♀️

Five years had elapsed since Teresa Sievers was murdered when her murderers stood trial and were convicted. A whole lot can happen in five years, and, since every officer who testified was excellent, it’s not surprising that they would have been able to pass their tests (written, verbal, and sometimes even physical) and be in possession of the necessary references from their superior officers. The way they handled this case may have been a factor in their promotions, but, since they were promoted _before_ either trial had commenced, they obviously couldn’t have been as a result of a conviction. I don’t understand the part of your comment where you mention the coroner report and the police investigator, sorry.