Same! I like Zolder and have a little more experience on it, I will try it this time

im a beginner (30h in ACC) and work on the lizenz. i need a 1.32.7 on zolder and this 7 times. im on 1.33.7 right now and dont fint time without help.i need this video on german language.😪

thank you for stopping by to say that

congrats! now onto the real stuff

Yeeh das ist richtig!!!!

mein PayPal schicke ich gleich :D

@@SimracingPopometer Sobald ich mein DD pro habe und darauf eingefahren bin, hab ich tatsächlich vor Mal ein Coaching mit dir zu buchen, um zu lernen wo die letzten Sekunden liegen bleiben :D

yeah the kerbs are much rougher this patch for some cars. So what worked in season 10 might not work anymore today

Thanks. I feel better now. Still need to find another 1.5s per lap though :-) @@SimracingPopometer

make sure the wheel in the virtual car is turning the same amount as the one in your hands. usually you achieve that by setting both driver and game to the same degree, which at least needs to match or be greater than what the car has. to not worry at all: set both to 900. (there are some rare wheels that do things differently, but for most cases, this would be the way)

neben talent ist es auch einfach die Menge an Zeit, die die jungen Leute investieren können

lowfuelmotorsport.com/faq?c=4&q=

ja, das geht auch mit den presets. die sind vllt 1-2s langsamer? maximal bei der kurzen Strecke

@@SimracingPopometer Welche Kauf-Setups kannst du persönlich empfehlen? Speziell auch jetzt für die Kombination: Audi - Zolder - LFM-Lizenz?

@@TopicHopser ich habe extra eins dafür gemacht, sieht erster Link in der Video Beschreibung ;)

​@@SimracingPopometer Ach das ist ein Setup. 🙈 Ich hatte das nur überflogen und auf die Schnelle für ein reines Datapack für Popometer gehalten. 🤣

@@TopicHopser Paket heißt IMMER setup und Daten. sonst ist der Vergleich ja schwierig

1:32.69 average

lowfuelmotorsport.com/faq?c=4&q=

the lap is valid. check in the popometer software and you'll see that you are cutting more than you think.

nils eine frage, ich hab grade den audi evo 2 gefahren,der scheint mir besser für die lfm zolder lizenz zu liegen als der neue ferrari.was ist deiner meinung nach der bessere wagen dafür? schade das man dir nicht privat schreiben kann, ich wünsche dir und deinem team viel glück in münchen. gruss rudi

über discord ginge das. anyway: du kannst das wirklich in jedem Auto machen. Die notwendige Rundenzeit bringen alle Autos auf die Strecke. Womit auch immer du dich wohl fühlst

its probably all of it? :) With 1:36 you're apparently just beginning, but there will also be fundamentals that are wrong still. You certainly dont have to jump the kerbs as aggressively as I do especially in the first chicane. Yet, of course to shave of lap time and on such a narrow track zolder - there're infinite amounts of time stored in using the little track that is available. A very typitcal issue when someone is still very slow and can't find a way out, its probably an issue of perspective: You are likely stuck in the mindset that the corners are all the challenge - everyone can drive a straight, right? The issue is that you will likely always fail the corners in a way, that you enter the straights very slowly and there's just no way for that speed difference to go away again until the end of straight, which means you will lose the majority of lap time on the straights. So what do you have to do? Stop going all in on the corners, make sure you slow down early enough to easily make them and put all your effort into leaving the corner quick, rather than entering it quick. Im fairly sure that if you went for the data comparison, you will find that the time delta increases massively on corner exits and you might even "gain" on corner entry before the car is entirely out of position to maintain speed onto the straight

@@SimracingPopometer Thanks for taking the time to respond - really valuable input and I'll try and work on the exits and come back to LFM in a later season.

Hello 👋, it should be on the LFM page, next to the password on the bottom right of the page Hope It helps, cheers

yes, that happens a lot in games. our surfaces are much more static than real tracks and our cars cost 0€ to repair.

@@SimracingPopometer I understand that, but I feel that having such times achievable in the current state of racing sims, somewhat lessens the status of simracers. Outsiders, seeing such times, will think that simracing is never a serious contender as RL racing. I personally would rather see better track surface grip detailing and obstacle/objects realism to simracing to give simdrivers the randomness of racing. Eg: Marbles, oil, sand, water, car parts from accidents etc.. Better car damage modelling physics also would be nice so that sim racers prioritize not having accidents and finishing the race more. I wonder how a RL driver can do a PB hotlap, posting exactly the same time everyday?

@@winnythekahuna8073 there are limits to what level of detail you can simulate on a variety of available hardware to keep the game playable. if you want a sim that needs a 10 million € machinery to run, then you'll need a 10m machinery. lap time being off by 1% does not exactly invalidate simracing. if anything it shows how good it is despite the many limitations there are. the comment section here is certainly too small, for what needs to be said on that, but it's all not just a choice or easy. and again, the times are completely fine if you actually compare same with same. you can't take a random real life gt3 time from a certain year, bop, tire, weather state and put it against the absolute optimal time in a sim with a car that's not even trying to mimic the other one. different power, different weather, different weight, different tire. it would need some proper magic to turn out the same lap time. I really disagree that an isolated lap time says anything about the state of realism

@@SimracingPopometer Interesting view. I honestly just would love to see sim racing development to further add more of the other nuances of RL racing such as the "fear factor" and mechanical preservation to increase the validity of sim racers as real potential RL racing competitors. I don't know what genius game developer could employ to add the fear of random track events or mechanical failure and still make a game playable but when I see a lap time that is better than the RL track time in a similar car, I feel that the sim game has failed because those RL lap times would have been scary to achieve or pure good luck on the day. I would just love to see sim racing development somehow stimulate and incorporate the emotional rollercoaster racers have with driving fast, so that into the future, using VR, simracing would attract more fans, more online racers and having the RL racers considering the sim lap times as serious times. Anyway, I appreciate your work within the community and your opinions.👍

as for fear factor: I'm fairly sure this wears off in the real car. Else you wouldn't have F1 drivers crash 3 times in eau rouge, because he refuses to lift. Or cars coming together at 250 into a corner. The fear factor comes back after they lose grip, not before. There is no lap time left on the table because of fear. The problem with real life racing is that there are MUCH more factors involved that actually make real racing quite a shit experience, over which you have little influence. I would certainly not play a game that tries to make my life miserable. Not everything about real life racing is good and not everything should be taken to the sim, so that we can actually have a better, more equal, more fair experience. And then I don't care to be a real life racer. Real life racing is entirely about money. Rarely anyone has the freedom there to race because of talent or whatnot. Its a super expensive hobby bloated up to be TV broadcasted. I do not want that struggle for millions of euros every year. Failing to find the money is a bigger fear than getting injured in a crash. I am very comfortable in the sim. It's a category on its own, and those who want to become real life racers, sure, go ahead, best of luck - but it's a different thing alltogether in every aspect apart from the driving. I personally like simracing because you are in charge of a machine, its entirely up to you to control it in every aspect, breathe as one with the machine The whole "oh no simracing isnt realistic so i cant watch it"-crowd... I don't care about them. They are living in the past, its futile to try and convince individual people. If sim racing ever wants to be successfull (whatever that means), it must become independent from real life motorsport, because a lot about it is wrong and because it is destined to die in just a few decades. Sim racing should not seek to be a feeder series for real life motorsport, it should not seek to be the same and it should not seek to replace it. That's the thrill: being in charge, or battling to be in charge.

wenn ich zeit finde mach ichs nochmal auf deutsch ;)

I think its save to say that if you cannot pass the license, you would not have fun in the races. You need to have a minimum of control over your car to drive with others around you. If it was for me the license test would be stricter and would involve more than just consecutive laps below a certain threshold time. Maybe take the fact that the license test is challenging for you as a hint that you still need time to drive save around others cause you are still struggling with yourself and where to put the car. Not trying to be rude, but its genuinely better to have a good fundament in driving before needing to adapt to other erratically behaving humans. If you want, shoot over a replay on discord or record a lap with the popometer.io tool and I can have a look and give a few tips around baiscs if i may Rf2 has a lack of players already and the license test would make it worse, so i get why theres no barrier

@@SimracingPopometer ya i passed the test yesterday i was just being a scrub. i still need work but im at least learning. thank you for the detailed video.