Underrated comment lmao

Sounding a little salty there. Why don’t you open a YT about guns then get a cameraman who will then do the same

😂 God I hope so... Let it be a thing

Lmao 😂

@@11BReloit’s a joke… you’re the one sounding angry…

Garand who??? :-)

😂

That would be siiiiick!

Dork comment.

Dammmnnn

This. What's the measured velocity lost from being ported? Seems like the equivalent to an inch of barrel, which has an impact.

Depends on the whole setup and ammo. There's at least one video on here somewhere, where someone actually picked up a few fps with ports. I don't know how, crazy. But, its usually not much of a drop at all. I'll get around to testing mine eventually.

This has been tested by other guntubers. The lose is nearly none. I have both setups with tlr H1 and tungsten. Ports blow away radian. Not even close rapid fire drills.

Exactly. Over and over people say 9mm is just as good as…40s&w, 45 acp, etc. they also say modern gun powder, new bullets…etc. then they run Jell-O shots loads and port their gun. They’re basically shooting less power than 380 acp.

@@DTex.45ACP It’s incredibly negligible. We’re talking 20-30fps. Effectually zero.

Literally thinking about doing the same switch. lol

Friendly reminder, remember RAPPS: Religion Assembly Press Petition Speech

How do you like it? Is it worth it?

@@davidparrales1175 the radian ramjet and afterburner fucks, just buy it already

what if i put an afterburner on my 17 lmao

You mean, 9mm doesn't need to be comped?

No he actually was speaking English so not sure what your excuse for not comprehending basic English is…your attitude is compensating for something is my guess

​@@5whiskey5 you mean, i can comp whatever the fuck i want because its mine?

@@DoraTheMFDestroya of course you can. You do you, Boo Boo. 😘

​@dorathedestroya2449 ive seen a comp for 22lr so yeah

I like my 17c but its recoil from a 17 is negligible.

I second this😂🤌🏼

Dang, that must be one massive duty holster

@@bidenhatesamerica Naw l carry a SAFARILAND 6362 RDS for a Glock 34 mid-ride no issues bro.

​@@timoanez4668Did you put the foam in the bottom so the 17 doesn't rattle? If not.. highly recommend 👌

@DeltaP Heck yeah bro that is the way! Stay safe out there 🙏

@@Austin-id3qx No, it doesn't bother me.

@DeltaP I bet that depends a lot on the size and number of the ports, and the powder and how much of it used. Then, the length of barrel also plays a vital role as well..

i've also had a degradation in accuracy, after having a barrel ported.. as well as, with aftermarket ported barrels, vs the stock barrel. i've not noticed that with comps.. once re-zeroed, they seem to stay consistant.. were with my ported barrels, i still get more fliers

My first thought on seeing the thumbnail. I came here to say this myself.

QVO Tactical and Tier 1 Concealed both have lots of content with ported barrels and comped guns and have both discussed the difference being negligible. We’re talking 20-25 fps which would amount to less than .25 ft/lbs of energy difference so effectively zero difference regardless of barrel length or port design (Within reason. Meaning any logical setup. Not stupidly massive ports, not 15 holes, ports being located at least halfway down the barrel and not by the chamber, barrel lengths reasonably expected for carry, ammo types reasonably expected for carry, etc.) I have also measured velocity with ported, comped, and normal barrels on a Glock, velocities were all within very small increments, even overlapped some with shitty ammo. Just info I’ve seen and put together on my own. 🤙🏽🤙🏽🤙🏽

One thing no one talks about with comps is it's adding weight to the WORST part of the gun; the front. Adding weight upfront makes the dip/back to battery feel way more significant.

Official glock 🐎 jiz

WHAT DID HE SAY AT THE END THERE

​@zachanglin1810 you: "I need a capable semiautomatic compact frame handgun" Glock: "how about the Glock 19?" You: "I'll also need a barrel of horse cum" Glock: "You're not gonna believe this..."

@@minusmartin🐶🔫👮‍♂️

@@johnthomson2377 someone somewhere said “better rufus than me” and really stood by it

I actually did some research on this and found it to be such a negligible loss in velocity it wasn’t worth mentioning. (30 fps being the high end and 5-15 fps on average)

@@micahmayfield oh nice, appreciate the response and added info

I ran with a ported Glock for a little bit and it kinda sucked. Made the tritium/phosphorous paint on my front iron sights completely covered in carbon after several rounds. It also made cleaning the internals more of a hassle as it gunked up more

@@Bingalzwe’re you running straight line ports ? I think a chunk port would be better since it would move the front sight behind the chunk port and only the front of the barrel and slide would get dirty as opposed to the straight line comps take up a bigger amount of the barrel /slide

Nerd.

Comps for comp(etitions) Ports for carry. Just like right tight memorization

It's exactly that. It's not port vs comp but rather how each is done.

Facts, I've had issues with my last 3 orders through them

@@David-cy2ug They're legit terrible. I have no idea how they are still in business.

I had an extensive conversation over email with optics planet about the exact part I wanted. They still sent the wrong one and they wouldn't take it back.

@@brody7020 They are assholes, liars, and their "customer service" is terrible.

It really depends - and actually might surprise you. Both monsoon tactical and Vulcan machine works port barrels on 1911 and 2011s for 250. Granted this is a send out with sometimes long lead times. The ramjet afterburner is 390 and you have to do it yourself. Final consideration tho, is that porting a barrel voids the manufacturer warranty but a compensator doesn’t

He had a really good video. I used his finding to make a decision on my edc (Went with radian afterburner, I have kids and if worse comes to worse and shtf I don’t want to be holding baby in arms with ports)

@@seltiks911 absolutely. Gas isn’t comfortable but ultimately isn’t going to hurt any unintended targets.

Those fragments are flying upwards though. Not backwards. Could be a eye hazard if you like to hip fire with your ported gun

@@jason200912 that’s why I said “shooting from retention” which is a situation that could happen. Something to consider.

Major downside for sure. Trying to find tests to see if the same shrapnel issue is true for a comped barrel or a internal comped barrel.

So yes. That said some of that has to do with the load. Different loads will work comps differently. For example loads that have higher pressures and more gas will force the comp to dip (like the +p loads) but powder puff loads (like the Jello shots) may not work the comp enough. This is without even considering the recoil spring weight and how lighter recoil springs sometimes help with that dip, but then it’s eating less of the cycling energy. None of this is as simple as, throw a comp on there and hope for the best. For example, my open gun has both porting and a compensator and fires 9 major ammo at about 160% maximum factory load pressures. Even shooting way hotter ammo than anything this Glock can handle, it shoots flatter than any of these guns. It is a system, not just any one thing, that drives how the gun behaves.

Both guns had different stippling. So the green ported one could have been rotating/slipping in the hand? 🤷‍♂️

@@jerichorosaswhat pistol platform?

@@dsrrecordsent CZ 75 TS Czechmate. It’s set up for USPSA Open Divison. The 9 major load is 124gr @ 1370 FPS, from my math I’m at around 45,000- 50,000 PSI chamber pressure (30,000 is around where most factory loads sit). Just trying to make a point that compensators invert the relationship between felt recoil and bullet energy.

@@jerichorosas 1000% Thank for for the reply and explanation I totally understand the more energy the better the comp will work and your 9mm major loads are phenomenal! 124gr’s rolling at almost 1,400fps is 357MAG energy in an auto! That’s more than impressive and I bet you have NO problem knocking steel down my only question is what barrel length are you running?

Especially the Radian, since it doesn't use a threaded barrel and can be swapped with ease.

They’re great in my experience. I kept my Glock 45 completely stock outside of the ramjet and have never had a malfunction in 4,000 or so rounds

Hang a heavy lead flashlight and there you go, even more weight.

Add a silencer too for more weight

I think you loose about 100 fps with ported and none with comp. I'd like to see a comparison also. Comp still has a full barrel is probably why it's not effected.

@dduffy8245 People are spamming it in the comments and even Micah said it himself in the comment section responses. He lost 15-30 fps from ports so don't worry about it. It'd like losing half a mm of barrel length haha.

@@jason200912 I understand, a lot of what ive read about the ported barrels shows minimal fps loss, however, defensive ammunition is designed for specific FPS's, so I think it would be interesting to see if the minimal FPS loss effected the expansion and penetration of the bullet.

@@scottrenner1576 hollow points perform better with lower fps generally. One exception might be ranger talons which are very unreliable and require super long barrels or the bullet won't open up due to regular clothing. Federal HST, Gold Speer both seem to have no difference whether +p or standard is used. With the exception that 147 HST penetrates 2 inches less at 15" at standard load. If the defensive ammo offers a +p option, it's usually better to take it unless you specifically want 147 HST which for lower penetration. Corbon, barnes XPD, Vortac all use the exact same bullet and in my opinion are the best, most reliable 9mm hollowpoint that expands exactly to double the 9mm original bullet unlike HST and gold dot which only achieve about 150% diameter. The XPD bullets penetrate 13 inches of gel which means it can probably only be used for direct bullet to attacker purposes and cannot be used for punching barriers that you get with 18" gel punchers.

Are you still using a glock 19 holster?

from what i see the pmm is better

@@straplyfedjbut it’s way too long

@@oscarcortez5863 not the pmm micro comp. Its about the same size as the radian. And from many videos i see its better.

@@straplyfedj people like the radian because it’s smaller and doesn’t add too much length, looks aesthetically pleasing. On top of that it’s a thread-less design which makes it 50 state legal

Shoot kit a msg

I’d be down for a run of them.

@@-LWS- Well damn son! If it happens, mark me down as a buyer!

is this guy being astroturfed? how does he have so many guns and such good filming with so few subs? love his vids but it's crazy.

a PMM Micro JTC would have been the appropriate barrel/comp choice for this.

No, the bullet leaves before the gases can slow your fps. But that ported barrel and slide will through so much trash in your eyes and the fire ball. idk if I would edc it. Along with those slide cuts..if you drop the gun the slide can and will brake

​​​@@SpaceRanger187I use a ported G19 and there's no debris back in my eyes. However the slide does get fouled much quicker. The fireball is no more visible than my standard G23 clone.

Curious of that myself

There is, 5-10% loss is average

3 to 5% loss max from ported. I’m running a Zev hype comp & my velocity loss to a solid unported barrel is actually 2.3 to 2.5% max. So it’s VERY minimal…. We’re talking 50 to 80fps.