Ferrari used their raw peer and blitz changed and mixed that with some strategic magic idk of,

Like Jeremy Clarkson said during this era, "Ferrari has been using Science and Maths and since then, they have been top of the tree"

Let's not forget the fastest driver today, MAX 👍

@@gangoffour6690 what the fuck does this have to do with max

@@gangoffour6690 lol 😂 cringe 😬

“The Ferrari team in general are like a clockwork operation.” Damn.

@@ChristianVidauri because they used to be European, now they aren’t coordinated at all, looks like Mediterranean people

@@Luchon20082010 Is that some sneaky way of being racist ? Anyway they had the 2 biggest brains on the grid with Ross Brawn and Jean Todt, they just need to get new strategists and they are good to go...

@@Luchon20082010 Italians are also Europeans, so ?

@@unwokeneuropean3590 i know i was just being ironic

KZfaq recommendations just pouring salt in our wounds

Well what RB did in Hungary was almost as incredible as this. It's just that the 4 stopper was only possible with Michael behind the wheel

@@elonmusk9697 How can you say that what RB did was anywhere near. RB didn't need to do shit, just go for the correct strategy (2 Mediums, 1 Soft in any order). Ferrari just lost the race big time. Granted Max did have some other cars to overtake but it's not that difficult when you are racing F1 cars agains F1.5

I miss the sound of these cars

I was about to say the same. Here is a woke idea - too many Italians in the team?

Yeah the TV direction is what stood out to me, it's miles better. Sad to see modern F1 even lost the TV direction.

I find the high pitch sound quite irritating to be honest.

the cars felt so much faster because of the way the cameras were set up

Things that were better then: Ferrari

@@cyan_oxy6734 What!!!!!????? Are you even human?

Maked it easier when the driver is capable of such special talent

Well they had a good strategist like Ross braun. Now the current ones at Ferrari looks like a bunch of clowns, trying to cook.

When Ferrari has won, it has almost always been IN SPITE of the team and its shitty strategies. Almost all Ferrari victories can be pinned on the drivers themselves and a small handful of strong-willed and self-aware people on the team. Ferrari as a whole is pompous, arrogant, and indecisive. It always has been. Even when the cars were good they only got that way because people like Schumi sacrificed ungodly amount of their time testing and pushing the team forward with their large personalities. Ferrari itself has rarely if ever been the actual catalyst of their own success. Maybe their mystique and popularity is the red color. Or maybe people just want to break a wild horse that has no discipline or intelligence.

Ross brawn and John todt Ferarri will never win with an all Italian team members. The environment in there probably feels like a family environment.

The good ole days lol

On the rare day that my boy manages to not crash

@@RNCHFND He crashed two times where only one put him out of the race.

4 stops worked back in the day due to the refuelling, different game these days.

@@RNCHFND Leclerc only crashed 2 times, Leclerc is just pushing harder than normal, because he doesn't know when he will get another car this fast again.

Leclerc dragged that Ferrari and shockingly defeated Red Bull in Austria, and later P2 in WDC ahead of Perez. Who does that? Only the inevitable drivers. The guy who drags the Ferrari to a top 5 in the British gp despite having worn hard tyres. Verstappen would finish P11 if he drove the 2022 Ferrari, bcs he only knows how to drive a rocketship.

Ferrari in 2020 : 💀🗿

Today's Ferrari = Salvador Dali clockwork

Understood, we are checking

Something something italian something something passion something something unprecented speed. *barely made any improvements since last year* "Next year." 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Ferrari since 2009: 💀

Brawn, Todt, Byrne and Schumacher were indeed a dream team

@@pdrseverance *leglerg

​@@joakimjeppsson1443 I keep saying this. It was never "Ferrari" that made them so dominant in that era. Those specific people would have made any team a powerhouse.

@@Ro7ard they made ferrari a powerhouse. Ferrari was a dead team before schumi came

@@mirrrie Ferrari before Schumi was like todays Ferrari

W11.

@@mtnmoo Was not driven by the best driver

@@mtnmoo definitely didn’t sound good and pretty average in terms of looks

@@mtnmoo current F1 is borderline shite in terms of car looks, sounds and drivability m8.

@@falkenaugeoli5939 xd

It looks much faster than todays cars. But obviously it isn’t.

@@herceg6772 I actually doubt that, in race pace the 2004 cars are quite fast

@@thomasvanasperen9097 there are some comparisons on you tube showing todays car slightly faster. However 2000-2006 cars looks more agressive and faster thru curves.

@@herceg6772 In qualifying laps and at the end of the gp on low fuel the 2020 cars were faster, but over a full race stint the 2004 cars were faster because they carried far less weight, and were a lot more nimble. The modern cars have a lot more torque through having turbocharged engines and electric motors to supplement them, as well as having a higher peak power, and the modern cars have a lot more downforce. What this equates to is cars that are pretty equal overall, but deliver their pace in totally different areas. The 2020 Mercedes W11 is slightly over 5.7m long, with the Ferrari F2004 being a little over 4.5m long. The W11 is 141kg heavier than the F2004. The weight difference blows out even more in the 2022 cars, with the 2022 cars being 798kg, compared to 605kg in the 2004 cars. That's a 32% increase in weight, and a 26% increase in length, which is why modern cars look so lazy and easier to drive at the limit than the old cars. That explains why the old cars were just so much more dynamic on track. Bringing those car specs back, but with slicks and no driver aids, would be the ultimate F1 for me, and would make the modern cars look like a joke. (also just putting slicks on a 2004 car would make it significantly quicker than the 2022 or even the 2020 cars).

@@formulajuan5762 👍

They knew Michelin tyres were usually better in 1 lap in Q than Bridgestone tyres - which Ferrari had so they preferred race strategy.

Because of fuel loads during the refueling era, pole was less important. Ferrari could carry much more fuel than rivals to run a more "ideal" strategy. When they ran low fuel, especially in 2002 and 2004, the car was unbelievably quick.

@@willski1221 it was reported that the Bridgestones ferrari used were completely different than the ones other teams were using....Eddie Jordan once revealed that in an interview

@@bugsy791 they 100% were Michelin did the same with Renault and McLaren (made custom versions of their tires)

@@willski1221 i think in the same interview he said when they were fitted to the jordans they significant ly faster

same

Nothing good comes out of a tyre war

@@Alucard-gt1zf ,yh or does. When someone conserves there tyres better and then can have different strategy is nice to see like Hamilton putting on softs at Hungary last weekend

@@archiesutherland6127 the tyre war is not between drivers but between the tire manufacturers

The people who brought DRS and KERS to racing must be thrown under the sea 🤮

Only the Kaiser can achieve that

On today’s grid there’s probably only 3 people who could pull this off. Alonso, Hamilton and Verstappen.

@@moeez1211 Hamilton 25 positions gained in sprint and race in Sp last year, so I agree with u

@@moeez1211 not verstardpen

@@barryallenwastaken you’ve got to be one sad delusional boy to say ‘not verstappen’

@@moeez1211 and that's why Schumacher, Alonso, Räikkönen, Hamilton and Verstappen are the best drivers of the last 20 years (sry Rosberg and Vettel)

it's jean todt.. he's french..

And Rory Byrne.

Forget Byrne !

schumi raced alone and ferrari worked only for him. and not because he was the best, but he had the best sponsors. the day the Schumi retired the other Ferrari driver won easily

@@leart78 I'm only replying for the benefit of others, you clearly have an axe to grind against M. Schumacher. First of all, the driver who replaced him at Ferrari did not easily win. He had two points over 2nd and 3rd places, that hardly qualifies as "easily". Kimi was no slouch either, one of the best drivers of that generation. Second point, we've seen drivers with "best" sponsors who amounted to nothing or barely anything. Third point, before Michael Schumacher went to Ferrari, they were not doing well, at all. He spent a few years with them, working and building together. Then they ripped the benefits for the years to follow. If anything, we can say that Kimi inherited the benefits of years of prior work. Forth point, you can say whatever you want against Schumacher. He won several championships with and for Ferrari. After he left, they won a single driver's word title, back in 2007. Surely they haven't done that on purpose. Keep grinding that axe, you'll need it to cut through your foolishness.

@@Sam-zh8jdabsolutely well said.

There are 3 drivers I can recognize without any sound: Kimi, Alonso and Alesi (hand position for Jean).

Fernando could handle the Renault that way because of the different tyres and tyre attack angle in corners. He basically oversteered into the corner to get straight faster than other drivers and to be able to accelerate out of the corner faster. Couldn't do that in the Ferrari later however, since there tyres were different.

They were. Sometimes.

@@klamin_original mass damper needed this type of input mate

@@klamin_original actually he intentionally induced understeer. Michael and Kimi like oversteer-y cars. Alonso did this because of two reasons: the renault had a very solid rear end, and the michelin tires were bricks, meaning they were incredibly strong and were very cold. He sacrificed time going into the corner by understeering, but this heated the tires up more and gave him incredible traction and drive out of the corner. That is why he doesnt do it on every corner, and understeered varying amounts per corner.

Also good french gp. Much more interesting than todays

So light and agile it's fucking beautiful Not like today's shitty hybrid boats

elaborate "this"?

wdym by this bruh 💀 every car is like 10 kilometers away with barely any chance of overtaking

@@MyChannel-ww8mo go and watch DRS sh*t

V10 sound baby!!!

@@MyChannel-ww8mo only thing they would say is "V10 !!!!!" Completely ignoring the disparity between the cars lol

Thats 80% true. The other 20% was that the pitlane at Magne Coure was really short which made the timeloss in the pitt minimal. And it was Michael Schumacher who drove.

Montoya wasn't that slow. And he didn't pit 4 times. The F2004 was unbelievable fast AF and got the combo fast car+world champion skilled driver. That's why they can afford strategies like that and get in the pocket.

Driven by the best driver ever

Bring back BRIDGESTONE tyres as well 😢 Not the SHITTY PIRELLI we have today

I miss Magny Cours so much 😢💔

Yeah it was but at the time people were complaining. Looking back it was great.

@@ciaronsmith4995 Because of pollution

@@Sacciuiguai It wasnt about pollution it was about the gaps between teams and lack of overtaking

@@Sacciuiguai the lacking of overtake was terrible, the most "exciting" moments where the pit stops, the show was basicly watch schumacher win almost races, no overtaking just positions changes on pit stops.

@@ciaronsmith4995 compared to modern F1 this era was a total bore fest, even the Merc domination was much closer than the Ferrari years

Well he lost to Trulli in 2004, and failed to win a race in a very fast Renault that year, so it wasn't that brilliant. In my view Kimi had the best driving style, followed by Michael, Mika in the V10 era. Alonso had an ugly but effective driving style though.

@@ciaronsmith4995 because you are Kimi fan. Duh

@@GraciasAlo14 Has nothing to do with it.

​@@ciaronsmith4995 Most Alonso fans don't care about Raikkonen, but you Kimi fans always going furious when you see good comments about Alonso. I think you guys have a serious inferiority complex.

We've all seen that video man

@@Iunio92 interestingly, I searched for it after writing this, but I couldn't find it. The Driver61 video about Alonso is just gone

@@Iunio92 no

nah michael just made ferrari seem like a competent and professional team

@@mikepod637 Both your statements are true though lol because it wasn't just the driver that made that team. It was the ruthlessly competent leadership.

Except for Spa.

Yes except for Spa but with Monaco if Montoya wouldn't have crashed into Schumacher and 1993 DNF ahead of Senna, he would be the king of Monaco

Because of things named camera tech (FPS and so on)

2004 cars might've actually been faster than current F1 cars - they were so much lighter which made them much more nimble, and the smaller cars make it seem like they're travelling faster too

@@meable3763 put them on modern slick tyres from 2021 and they would certainly be faster

Well Ralf Schumacher drove his old bmw in austria and had times good enough for q3 , with slicks

@@mArvAlcao71 fps bruuuuh. No. It's because the difference in fov

Unbelievable observation. It could be delayed though as some images were back then - he seems to move his left thumb after the pitlane speedlimit line. If not, that should have been penalized. Potentially another mistake in a poor season by Alonso, frankly.

Possibly audio sync error? They had auto detectors back then.

Audio isn’t synched properly I don’t think. Look at his left thumb on the pit speed button, seems like it’s legal

@@ciaronsmith4995 Not a mistake if he wasn't penalized tho

typical comment from people who don't know F1.

Proper cars, proper engine, proper SOUND, proper drivers, everything 😢💔

Did you count the overtakes in the video? How exciting😐

yea they look quicker too

It's because of the Camera

And they are so much lighter so they look faster and more nimble. The new cars are heavier and they are also filled with fuel, these are lighter and don’t have nearly as much fuel

Turbos both now and in the 80s are far superior to those boring NAs

@@Sticktothemodels Turbos are for diesels. Real men like screaming NA monsters.

Croft is a stain on modern F1. Incredible he's kept the job for 10+ years.

@@thomasconway95True, and he’s disgustingly biased that I sometimes have to mute the stream.

Especially Ted love you

No

Well said. The racing today is a little false as most of the overtakes are done with drs. No setting up just waiting for the drs line. This is why the cars are closer together. I loved the 80s 90s 2000s with refeuling and tyre strategies and drivers going flat out.

The only thing that made old F1 better was the refuelling. And less dirty air compared to prior seasons. Stop with the nostalgia

@@purplestarfish6356 it's not nostalgia. The strategy options different tyre brands/ compounds gave different strategy options. The cars sounded absolutely amazing. While I can appreciate the technical brilliance of the current cars, there is no excitement about them. The noise it what used to seperate f1 from other motorsports. Now they do the same tyre stops and drive to conserve fuel and tyres and wait for the drs to overtake rather than setting up a genuine overtake.

You are right !

They had better power/weight ratio for sure

hell yeah they do

They are faster. Put them on slicks and they‘ll beat the times of the 2020 cars.

@@Reaz399 Not as simple, the groved tires were developed to suit the cars and the cars were developed to suit the tires

@@crazycupckake4676 Maybe but slicks are miles faster than grooved tires. Ralf Schumacher was driving the 2003 Willams BMW on slicks in Austria with a turned down engine and not being able to rev as high as he could and he put up faster times than all of the 2022 cars bar RB and Ferrari ( he also said that he oviously couldn‘t fully push at his age anymore) . Now imagine the F2004 with slicks, a setup tuned to that and low fuel. They would absolutely smash the 2020 cars especially on power heavy tracks.

We wish 😢

Always have the reputation to outperformed the car...

Mercedes too given Brawn and Schumacher helped build that team.

No man, these were thé boring days of F1. Trust me I followed F1 these years. 2004 was one big snoozefest with the winner already determined.

@@seezu84 Not for Ferrari's fans

I agree with seezu guy here, eventhough you rarely see a strategy like this nowadays, but mercedes strategy past few years have shown some incredible planning. But what u lost from the old days is replace with many wheel to wheel battle

Exciting ? I remember it being a snoozefest. Ferrari dominated whole year. Back then I was happy, because I rooted for Ferrari, but I don't remember any other great moment other than this.

Guys, this years were the years of the least overtakes in history of f1. And Ferrari was dominating. In 2005 and 2001 it was the least average of overtakes ever, 9,9 overtakes per GP. It was BORING . Stop with this nostalgic, saudosist blindness.

Sadly its all about money

Bad infrastructure, that’s why. It was a pain in the ass. I never liked Magny Cours, I think the track is boring.

@@exclusiveeu264 Sadly that is the world, and our lives. Hate it here

@@salmandudayev8259 I feel like it would be fun to drive with all the long croocked straights lol

@@mitchbrown6652 Nobody liked the track, it’s in the middle of nowhere. Circuit Paul Ricard is much better, but without the stupid chicane on the Mistral. So, next Stop South Africa, no more Baguette and Cheese, no GP in France.