Totally agree! Thanks for watching.

I don't actually find it big and bulky it's compliments the xpro2 and Xt2 brilliantly. It's been stuck on the xpro2 for a while now even though I prefer a 23mm!

Demos Soupashis it's doable, but compared to the F2 lenses, it's a bit on the long side.. Not necessarily big and bulky, perhaps poorly chosen and less precise adjectives to describe it. I also have used it on my xpro2 as my daily for quite a while despite its weight and length, but I can't deny as it's slung around cross my body, the lens hits my arm and I am aware of its presence and I have to lift my arm off my body a bit to avoid constant contact. To each their own, but even the F2 lenses are physically noticeable protrusions on the front of my XPro-2. I put up with them and the mitakon cause they are good lenses, but it can be unwieldy sometimes still, especially if you add a lens hood which extends them even further. What I have tried to use as my daily lens now is one of the inexpensive cctv lenses adapted. A 35mm f1.6 renders quite nicely for a $35 or less lens kit and it is very much super compact.. Even less than the 27mm F2.8 pancake lens. I recommend trying one as they cost like 3 decent lunches and can have a unique rendering to the bokeh. The focus throw is also alot shorter than the mitakon and a lot of other lenses which makes quick manual focusing quite snappy once u get used to the short turn of the focus ring and general compactness of such a lens. Tempted to try the 7artisans 35mm F1.2 as the build looks nice and nearly as compact as the 35mm f1.6 cctv lens I have right now. If you prefer the 23mm focal length. I would suggest maybe you try one of those cctv lenses about that length. They have a 25mm f1.8 lens (if not possibly a little faster) for less than $30 or even $25, I'm sure. I here good things about those with surprisingly positive results.

There are sample images from 9.28.

I choose the Fuji, because it's autofocus. Weddings are never static, so it is hard to control the movement with 0.95 MF.

For Street it's tight but you can get nice results from a distance, af isn't an issue if you zone focus on the frame and await for a subject to enter. For weddings I only use it for static shots it's difficult for moving subjects and thus a good auto af lens will definitely suit you better for weddings.

Piers Tazzanoot Size, II is smaller

@@pabloitare very hard to know if you don't have two lenses to compare!!!!! you can tell the difference based on filter thread.. the newer one is 55 n old one is 58 i think so check that number to know which is which

T L Sure! thanks 👍🏻

Unfortunately not. Just the 35mm

Lol why not just go to Flickr instead of watching a video of all you want is sample pics 🙈

The product must if changed, this one is the 55mm but wow they have shot up in price! Haoge 55mm Square Metal Screw-in Mount Lens Hood Shade for Leica APO-Summicron-M 90mm f/2 ASPH E55, Summicron-R 50mm f2 E55, Summilux-R 50mm f/1.4 E55, Elmarit-R 28mm f2.8 35 mm f/2.8 E55 Lens www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B076D6GLWF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_ZY59BbCRQGSQT

@@DemosSoupashis great thanks!

Oh yes!

It's a little long but I certainly wouldn't say huge.

Seriously all over the fucking place