Thanks a lot Dr Anderson I have never seen such a teacher.

Thank u for uploading those videos. They are lucid and easy to understand

Great sir. need more videos from you. stay healthy. have a wonderful life.

Dear Professor Anderson, very clear explanations! I took an online Physics class and your lectures helped me understand the textbook better. Thanks for your sharing.

Dr. Anderson I have to say that this video is super helpful. I really wish my teacher explained things with this much clarity.

Thank you Dr. Anderson for your help! The best physics professor in youtube!

Great! I loved your clear explanation. I can also follow all the math myself with pen and paper. The Learning Glass is fantastic, congrats!

thanks. you are an exquisitely intelligent individual (smart person XD )

You are the best Teacher in this whole cosmos. Your student from Nepal.

BEST PHYSICS LECTURES EVER !!!

Yes I have a question... if we consider the closed system to be the ball itself, then momentum is not conserved right? Cause according to the law of conservation of momentum, the change in momentum itself is not equal to zero? Also if we didn’t want to violate the law of conservation of momentum, we have to consider the interaction between the ball and the impart force to be a closed system right? I’m genuinely curious about this

Sean, no I'm not. Check it out here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eb14gNeEs7HciXU.html Cheers, Dr. A

I love it..

i salute you prof...you are amazing in teaching and delivering science concepts...thank you

Hello. I would like to ask a question with your permission. Let any object move in the horizontal plane for a certain period of time. Is an impulse defined for the normal force acting on the object perpendicular to the horizontal plane during this period, or for the weight of the object? In other words, there is no velocity change in the direction of these forces during the motion period, but this is because the impulse transmitted by the normal force to the object and the impulses transmitted by the weight vectors to the object are negative of each other. They do not contribute to the total impulse. Is this thought correct? It is defined as the product of impulse force and the duration of action of the force. Is this definition valid only for forces in the direction of motion of the object? If the net thrust transferred to an object can be calculated as the vectorial sum of the thrusts transferred to the object by each force separately, can we think that the thrust transferred to the object by a force that is not in the direction of motion of the object is also defined? Thanks.

I love your simple way of explanation why don't you upload new videos.

i like it alot .. thnk uu ... prof. anderson

Really helpful

Amazing explanation Anderson 🤗🤗keep it up

In the reflection, there is a guy with a Nike T-shirt...

Explained in plain English!

Thx!!

very good ,sir

F=ma and an additional +x. X being over spill or detached force, which is exponentially increased while gravitating. The earth grabs it. Even sound's effective force. Flying vessels, especially space shuttles push force into the earth, that F=ma doesn't cover. Ground wiring is the path of the water and gas that is effected by displaced momentous effects. Compressors, attics and the stomach carry the displaced force constantly. Gravity and the so known speed of light, are quick. The force is hidden by lack of interest. Force is also linked to cancelled voltages as a constant. Part of the equation that proves +x. I booked the generations that now light the world, I am God, so don't doubt what I speak. My name: Charlie John Thomas

Sir...pls make a video about aberrations and aplanatic points in geometrical optics briefly...sir

"Bueller, Bueller..." In case you forgot (or, god forbid, don't know): Matt is referring to this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r7uam7Zzz97ZiHU.html

You smile like Benedict Cumberbatch

I thought Impuls and momentum were the same thing...

the glass sound is like ;/ its really disgusting

I don’t understund