??

What telescope is this?

Very good job. Which country did you watch the moon from?

@@maxsmith695 what?

2,124 miles

@@zpirateko2129 - free Pedro

@@maxsmith695 More like 66,000 miles or something in that nature.

@@Micscience You would get a F- in my Physics class. It is not rocket science to measure the distance of the moon to the earth.

😂😂😂

Googel+ lmao

Heard that too.. 😊 😂😂

😂 😂 😂 😂

😅🤣

i don't know what kind of equipment this person is using, but if you observe the moon long enough, eventually you capture footage like this: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ebaEqZB535PYoGw.html

@@skylerlandale1437 I agree, would love to have the of that telescope he or she is using. Definitely other intelligent life forms in the universe for sure; it's so vast, we just haven't found anything yet. Check out the FOX LAKE incident, in Canada 1996, over 20 people see a craft, it was huge, the width of Fox Lake, and the height of an apartment block, here is the link: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iN5ljNOjy9vJcYU.html

@@david-ky7rt yes if we are observing them now, they have definitely been here for a long long time, and if they had any ill intentions, we would have experienced it by now. thanks for sharing that interesting link!

@@skylerlandale1437 Hi Skyler, no problem, the Fox Lake incident is well interesting, it might be linked to another incident that happened between whitehorse and Carmacks, two brothers were driving from whitehorse to carmacks, 177.0 km, a good 2 hour drive, and remote area, here is the link to that one, same year 1996: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/n6qXd9uS25nIYHk.html

@@skylerlandale1437 they use skywatcher telescope ..

Lmao

Hahahahaha

Yah thats one in tom & jerry

feta cheese, to be specific.

Wallace & Gromit

Did you catch any Ufo's ? i know there are a lot up there... Amazing Moon !

Dude the moon is a scary place just by looking at it on telescope and I'm wondering what Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin felt when they landed on it the first time, must be hair raising.

J.W.Astronomy check out John Leonard Walson’s YT channel, he is getting some resolution at the refraction limit, amazing. Also amazing is what he’s discovered up there. NASA has some explains to do.

Alexandra missDUTCHESS lol, it would just be a blob.... most stars are millions of light years away (or further) . Our Sun is the only star we can actually resolve with detail.

The moon is flat

Same

Same

🤨

thanks!

🤔 good question

HMM... WOW THATS A HARD QUESTION.................

Andrew Jenery read the book (PDF) Somebody Else is On the Moon. By George Leonard (c) 1977. If you want to know the truth. Why would the CIA buy up all the printings of this book? Only a few thousand made it to the street. Several people host servers that allow you to down load it for free. Learn the truth, tell others.

@@MrJackal43 It's a very interesting book

John Smith read its companion piece “Penetration” by Ingo Swann, the CIA’s top remote viewer. Startling stuff, why it wasn’t made into a movie IDK, well actually I do know, the CIA controls Hollyweird. Leonards book is mentioned in Swann’s piece, which is a PDF on the web as well... the truth is much more frightening then reality.

@@MrJackal43 I have started reading it. Might be a good time to finish it. Have you read any of Bruce Cathie's books?

John Smith no, he's the"electro-dynamic" grid guy, interesting stuff. I'll have to check out one of his books soon...

What s wrong with you people?

@@CrazyPets0 i dont get it ! I wrote a compliment , i wrote those are the most beautiful images i have haver seen and you wrote me : whats wrong with you? Are you ok??

​@@alicesabbadini6783 Yes, I'm ok. I copied that message, but I posted it in wrong comment. Sorry.

@@CrazyPets0 ah ok :) no problem!

@@alicesabbadini6783 Lazy kid never took 5 seconds in her life to google "NASA Moon picture" and comments "You give better moon images than NASA". How can humans be so lazy and so dumb? Look at this picture: moon.nasa.gov/resources/347/aristarchus-crater/?category=images

rafael moraes did you check you moms bedroom.

What, can you speak a little louder?

rafael moraes loo

90sq? Square metres?

Thank you! The camera is an Alccd5l-IIc. You can see an detailed article about it here: jwastronomy.com/me/equipment

J.W.Astronomy Can you find the spot where I landed on the moon in 1958 there should be a long furrow about 200 feett long some foot prints and a dead chicken that exploded there?

///AMG well it doesnt of course its not flat.

///AMG And you can see right through it. But they landed on it. Lol

@///AMG its not flat its a sphere just like earth

Thank you!

ABC TRAVELER you are a dumb fuck

😄😄

@@vagatronics are you? Take a joke

@@vagatronics no u

@@vagatronics so you dont believe in aliens? Even though NASA has confirmed them?

They usually aren't "straight-on hits". The impact crater "holes" are created by the release an object's "energy of motion" (kinetic energy) creating a massive explosion at the point of impact to excavate the crater. They are thus not by formed by the object's physical size itself just pushing the material aside at it hits, but by that huge blast from the impact which explodes in all directions like setting a bomb off at a certain location. For a terrestrial example, Meteor Crater in Arizona was formed when a body about 130 feet across traveling at over eight miles per second from the north-northwest hit the ground, forming a roughly circular crater that is 3,890 feet (about 0.74 miles) across. The impact explosion has been estimated to be equivalent to a 10 megaton nuclear bomb going off at the site. Even objects coming down at less than straight-on angles will generally form circular craters due to that massive explosion effect. Only meteoroids that come in at very low angles close to grazing the surface will form slightly oval craters.

Yea, I get what you mean in a way, But even the meteoroids that come at low angles dont leave a trail before hitting. I get that it might not have that effect on earth taking "gravity" into play. But the Moon has No gravity, there should be tons of Little rocks and huge rocks grazing the Moons surface and leaving a trail, right?

The Moon does have gravity. It's much lighter than Earth, so it's gravity is weaker, but it's still there. It's the reason we have tides on Earth (the Moon's gravity pulling Earth and the oceans is what causes the water level to rise and ebb twice a day) As for the circular impacts, I know it's not instinctive to think they have been caused by side hits. We're too used to look at low energy impacts (like a rock thrown into sand) that causes elongated marks. But when talking the kind of energy a meteor strike releases, it doesn't work that way anymore. Rock gets broken or even liquefied, and sent away in a circle by the energy of the blast. A good analogy would be what happens when you stike a liquid surface. If you throw a rock into water on a low angle, it won't leave a "trail". You will have some projections in the direction of the hit, maybe secondary hits, but mostly, you will always have a circular expanding "ring" wave, and a small projection right in the middle of the circle. Now look at these craters, with their ring of matter and the small protrusion in the middle. Looks familiar?

mark why does the moon not hit earth. if the earths gravity is much stronger than the moons ?

A very neat explanation.

Nope brotha i dont see em

😂😂😂😂

@@bullrancher6508 bottom right, in the crater

Thank you!

Moon buggy (Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle LRV) is too small to be resolved by amateur telescopes

www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19050795

Trust me it is TINY

@@karolmasztalerz1943 but not by non-amateur telescopes www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/584641main_apollo17-left-670.jpg

@@petterlarsson7257 That's not a ground-based telescope image though. This is an image from the LRO, Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. It's a spacecraft that orbits the Moon, and as such, it is much closer to the landing sites. In fact, LRO orbits around 100 km above the Moon, so that's significantly closer than any ground based telescope (Earth-Moon distance is about 380 000 km). Even professional ground-based telescopes can not see details as small as the lunar landers. For that, you need a spacecraft that orbits the Moon.

Wow

Hey! I have a more powerful telescope than the guy in the vid, and i just use an iphone 7

bond dwarfman u need to see it through the telescope

There are published papers of volcano activity making some of those craters supposedly. Some reason I feel like they are drill sites I don’t know why my mind goes places.

STEELSURFER where did you get your PhD

@@steelsurfercore5642 wow your a complete fucking dumb ass I know 7 year old Smarter than you

@@steelsurfercore5642 have you heard of gravity dumb ass

No.This is just stiching glitch from stacking process.

This looks like the LRO data with his color data overlayed i may be wrong if so wow.

So this is a CGI image is what your saying? Not an actual picture thru multiple lenses?

Jack, I fully agree with you having a go at these conspiracy morons, but please refrain from using a mental impairment as an insult.

what was edited out i dont see anything

No he can't

It was et up to take pictures of the moon and not the stars. When the telescope take pictures of stars they have to be out of sight of the moon because of its light obscuring the image.

ever heard of something called light

delusional kid

you wouldn't see it. It's way too small.

No flags on moon. That were staged on earth

Lol you know how small it is you fucking dumbass hahah. The moon isnt the size of a basketball.

In Hollywood!!

no.It is amateur image through amateur telescope

scattered around the globe, its very rare to see them on your telescope

prove you should be seeing dozens.remember they are far away from each other and are tiny

Karol Masztalerz There are supposed to be between 25,000 and 50,000 satellites. You could look at the moon for a week straight and you won't see any because there are no satellites.

Sal Amander my friend literally filmed one Passing moon and another friend took Photo of ISS in front of Sun :) there are less than what you said.Do some Research on subject.Most of them are to small to be Seen anyway

+Sal Amander it is quite common to see satellites zoom by while watching the night sky.

markus north it's called suppressed information.

@@ron1martens I can't believe all the ruckus over a simple question. the funny thing is I wasn't there to observe the moon I was interested in the photography technique which I find fascinating, and all I get is a bunch smart ass remarks.

markus north Initially I used to think trolls were like a stick in the mud. Then I learned Government and corporations spend billions to hire trolls to insult people, argue with them and be abusive. When you report them to utube, your response is their comment falls within utube guidelines. Then utube took away a feature which revealed where trolls were making comments and you could expose them. So keep this in mind. Trolls always deny they are trolls. And sometimes say they are. People have caught onto them.

@@markusnorth8071 Yes I know. Some of the supposedly intelligent ones can be as pathetically abusive as flat earthers, etc.

@@SMHman666I never realized there were so many people in the USA that are too ignorant to recognize gate way communism, too lazy to work, too educated to have common sense, too arrogant to listen to reason, too narrow minded to see both sides and prefer victimhood over freedom...

Just build a to scale model of Earth and Moon; you'll see there is plenty of room for anything go go in between.

the moon rotates. read a book. educate yourself .

no because the moon used to spin but it stopped spinning because it got locked in place because of earths graviational pull so now it no longer spins so its been around for billions of years so it could of been hit any time by asteroids

@@Splitpro_Games It still rotates at about once every 27 days.

@@SMHman666 yeah but we only see this side of the moon we never see the other side hence why its called the dark side of the moon

Exposure

stevengho ohgnevets....So, here we go with the "I can't see stars" thing again. Hasn't anyone explained that to you yet or do you simply refused to believe it. Any good photographer could answer that.

The light from the moon will overpower the light from a star, its the same reason photos of the Milky Way have to be taken when there is no moon in the sky.

Jimmie Hyatt The Moon has no atmosphere to block the stars from being seen. Here on Earth you can take pictures of the stars, even with our bright atmosphere...interesting how that is...

The atmosphere plays no part in the reason you can't see stars in a photo. Its all about time exposure. Photographing stars takes SECONDS of exposure time. Taking photos of bright objects like the full moon only requires fractions of a second.

George Luz and you are asking no questions. Here’s another spoon for ya. 🥄

@FEVA : however, he is right.

You mean dumb question like "how come that with a much better technology we are still not able to go in a place we have allegedly reached 50 years ago?". And please spare me with the nonsense of the cost. In the 60's they have spent real money (dollar was pegged to gold back then) while nowadays you can use worthless paper (funnily enough still called "dollar" though)

Flat Earth Vegan Amy it's a comment... in a comment section... more moronic flat head logic for you...

Why is it we can see the moon in full detail using digital cameras? Isn’t it supposed to be 239,000 miles away? I understand this is a telescope but with many digital cameras, you can get some really detailed shots of the moon. That thing is very close to Us.

www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-19050795

I mean people have to be really fucking stupid to think a FLAG will be visible on a fucking picture taken from thousands of miles away jeez

Lakitha Mutucumarana ikr

If you take an image of a city skyline that's 30 miles away, you cant see individual windows on skyscrapers. The same concept applies here.

well i wish you wern't here

yeah, totally. Let's get back to bombing gaza

Even the bluish grey around the moon???

Not saying it's fake just I guess like you said something edited.

curious goat interlude?

Jjromoustadz LOL STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORIST DETECTED

raw footage of moon. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qtyneq1zz8XOfqs.html

There is a detailed article about my equipment on my website. You can see it here: jwastronomy.com/me/equipment For Lunar picture processing I use Autostakkert 2

thank you for your response!

thomas marabillas ttpz

@Philip Labonte yea right;) So why do we have sunsets, that are not possible on flat earth?

Border between the illuminated and shadowed part called terminator.

Yeah, and you have the equipment listed in the description.