These cars not only safer, they're classy

Easier to get in, more room, better in snow, better visibility, better for dogs, easier to put things in and out. To me, it would need to be a station wagon and there aren’t many options in North America

Me neither. A sedan is much more elegant and better to drive than a big wobbly SUV.

En sevmediğim ve yol tutuşuna güvenmediğim suv modelleridir

In 55 years I have bought many cars, but never a station wagon, and the SUVs from my side might not produce them. Limousines or hatchbacks only. Type A5, A6, A7 or A8. Real cars. ❤

je i have that car, and i like it!

Km77 recently testet the Xantia again. The results is now max 71 km/h.

@@torbenlienljungbergnielsen5025 Xantia or Xantia Activa? Two different cars. What makes the 85km/h more impressive is that it is the TUV standard moose test which has tighter turns unlike the Km77 moose test which is more spaced out.

@@vs6300 Activa. In fact they tested two and I think it got to 73kph. Even if it's now outmoded, it's still awesome for a 90s car.

@@torbenlienljungbergnielsen5025first they need to service the Xantia. Can’t compare an old unserviced car and say it can’t reach the numbers. Must have been a POS.

​@@vs6300the Teknikens Värld moose test was nearly half a metre wider and had more distance between lane changes (at the second lane change). Three are a few other differences, all of which make the ISO 3888-2 standard tougher than the old Teknikens Värld one. If fact, they themselves switched to following the ISO 3888-2 standard in recent years. Even without comparing the two standards, just applying common sense, it would not make sense for the km77 result to be so much slower if the test was easier.

Never.. test was not done properly as well.. cars should be fully loaded

Fake News 😂

BMW 3 no1

The best driving cars in the D segment are BMW3 and Alfa Giulia.

not true, in real life it is al cars mixed on the roads

uahahaha

nope 508

@@pe7893 zzt

they should be with the factory tires :)

seems like you saw that crappy video about xantia and moose test. it was done again by some spanish guy and he proved its not true, as Xantia was not loaded fully according to ISO standard for moose test and wasnt speeding more then 71 kmph. find citroen xantia activa 1995 2001 moose test video and see it for youself. It is stupid even to consider old crap car xantia can compete with new cars. you have been pranked. xantia is good until 71 kmph, more than that , it loses control. New cars dont lose control even at 85 kmph thanks to ESC.

@@sagorevach 77km (that "Spanish guy") did not have same model which is irrelevant compere. Latest isn't always greatest.

And you're also not always riding around in sport mode..

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i52SaLZ-1NjGoWw.html

😂😂😂 i did Not See it before

Same mistake, TWICE.

I own a 508 SW 2.0 HDi 160 and it is the best car I had

It was the 508

@@bigfootisreal4147 nah

@@HadeyanUtkan I drove most of the cars in the video, and I was the least impressed with Insignia.

@@AbelSorin Thx for the feedback

@@AbelSorin Which ones are goid in corners?

That cheap plastic interior is atrocious.

That's ESP.

всё правильно, камри должа всех победить!

а если бы тест выиграла бмв/ауди/тойота (нужное подчеркнуть), то тест был бы объективным?))

@@pavelpetrovich2740 нет, для сравнения надо брать машины хотя бы близко схожие по технике

Yeah, with that plastic 1990's interior.

because?