Awesome! Happy to help.

Does it fit or did you have to add a spacer?

LOL! That's the only reason I posted this.

Good to know. Like I said I tried the shims - didn't think about the O-Rings. While I really like GG&G's quick disconnect sling swivel. Makes for quick transition from a two-point sling to a single point sling.

OoRaH! Thanks Brother!

bayonets will never be obsolete im surprised we dont have like mini lightsabers at this point

bayonets will never be obsolete im surprised we dont have like mini lightsabers at this point

shwesq I prefer the Army M9 bayonet simply because there are no serrated teeth.

Mossberg should make these things. I have been thinking that same thing since i saw how they fit. Any good machinist could make them and sell them even.

Never go wrong with a custom fabricated piece from a machine shop.

There is a youtube video about how to adjust the heatshield so you can use the magpul forend. Simple all I did was use a C-clamp and a rage to squeeze the heat shield side edges. This will allow the magpul forend to cycle with no issues.

Oo - F'n - RaH!

+William Ishoy Mine seems to stay on just fine.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcukpsh1kpvFd4U.html

I can't speak to the Drop Test or the 590 being adopted by the military. When I was in the Marine Corps I was only exposed to Remington 870s when I was on guard duty. I've seen some blogs and comments on the internet about this - but in all my years (64) I don't think I've actually seen this phenomenon with any firearm. I've seen accidental discharges but most were due to human error or a mechanical issue when they had the firearms in the operator's hand. I've heard it happens but I've never personally seen one discharge that was dropped. I personally never keep a round in the chamber of my home defensive shotgun when it's stored and only chamber a round when I'm ready to fire it.

@@Bret928 hmmm. I've always understood shotguns to not be drop safe, so I don't keep a round chambered either. But I have been " hearing " about and seen some videos of shotguns being dropped on purpose with a cap charge and nothing goes off. I've seen a few videos where the gun accidentally falls and it discharges. So ultimately, shotguns are not built like glocks and so I don't think its a good idea either but it's 50/50 with the arguments. Apparently AR's have a double hook system for the sear to catch which makes it impossible for it to discharge vs a shotgun only having 1 hook.

Ted Winter No. The rear mount it soldered to the barrel itself. You could maybe have a gunsmith move it back. But that is alot of expense and effort when the sling mount he uses is a quick and elegant solition.

I agree with you but it’s nice having the option.

alas ... it may be coming soon

Hope is not a strategy especially when the lives of our families are at stake. Better to have and not need than need and not have.

The only even remote scenario is a riotous political demonstration that goes sideways on your block, we saw this numerous times in 2020. Worth noting that the intimidating sight of a bayonet-shotgun could have an opposite, incendiary effect on an ideologically motivated mob. In our society, people don't always take a gun seriously until it's used. This is a "front porch" weapon.

Hi Michael, Sorry I have no idea. But if I had to guess there are plenty of Mossburg accessories. The 590SP I have came with the bayonet lug already attached.

Gene Cardwell I feel you may have gotten a lemon or two. I cannot see how this is a widespread issue that the military in all if it's years of use did not find this problem. I believe you had the issue you had. But to say all have a design flaw is just hard to swallow when the 500-590A1 all have been known to be very rugged hard use guns.

Thanks - but I've owned my 590SP for about 8-9 years and have never had a problem with it?

Don’t drop your weapon!

Donald Herbold 🤦🏻‍♂️

just usmc they suck thay get bikers do their killing then a blackwater fail just about kill guy that pay for the hit real winners hay ray how the bank job working out take out hit cost alot bake robing new for you

@@scouttroop291 What are you babbling on about?

Its been a while but I believe the Part # is GGG-1469. Here's a link, www.gggaz.com/mossberg-500-quick-detach-sling-attachments.html

@@Bret928 Thanks. I found this link. But none of the parts are in stock. www.gggaz.com/mossberg-590-quick-detach-front-and-rear-sling-attachments.html

Ron Smith oh mine fit but as I described in my video it wasn't the best fit. Just try to make it a little more secure. As I understand several people of had the same problem. You apparently got lucky.

is it the retrograde 590a1?

Not disagreeing with you. I believe the bayonet lug is more for aesthetics than practicality. Honestly - I probably wouldn't reach for my Bayonet and affix it to my shotgun if I heard a bump in the middle of the night and went to investigate. That said I have put about 50 rounds through my 590 with the bayonet attached and didn't have the experience you did with it falling off.

That said the Vietnam era M7 Bayonet does seem more functional. Less weight on the front of the shotgun.

guys take the pommel of your bayonet apart and look a the springy things that clicks on the lugs sometimes the ontario bayonet are machined poorly and these parts are rounded off if so just file it square and the probleme should be fixed

It's suitable for zombies

Robert Heller its suitable for any close range engagements especially if youre out of ammo kinda the whole point of a bayonet or melee weapon in combat anyway

Factory or aftermarket? Because last while there are lots of aftermarket ways to put a bayonet on an 870. The last time I checked the 870 didn't come from the factory that way.

After market.

It does not come from the factory installed.

I never said that it did. In fact I even stated "After Market" when Bret Duff asked if it was Factory or Aftermarket. A little late to the party aren't you? It still doesn't change the fact that my Remington 870 will take a bayonet.

LOL! Absolutely nothing. Them's my peps!

Why thank you for your insight. Fact is - it's just an intimidation factor. But hey someone would have to get past the 9 rounds of 00 buck before they'd have to worry about getting stabbed. But back to your advice - are you saying the Army and the Marine Corps made a mistake going with the Bigger Blades like the OKC3S and the M9? Pray tell - why didn't you tell them this back when they made those poor decisions? I'm sure they would've appreciated you knowledge & advice and acted accordingly. Think of all those millions of US Tax dollars lost on those bayonet contracts. ;)

So some one has an opinion about a type of blade stuck on the end of a weapon and you make the decision to turn it into a personal attack. Pay attention here...You have a problem sticking to my point which was the performance of a narrow blade vs fat blade which YOU totally ignored, try discussing this with someone who has first hand knowledge someday. Lets just look at how you see things. Your Quote not mine "One of the things that first attracted me to the Mossberg 590 was it could take a standard M7 bayonet". That says everything needed to be known since you have already determined you will NEVER need anything past 9 rounds and bayonet intimidation doesn't work well in the dark unless you plan on telling someone you have that really big knife. As far as Military's go. Who ever saw one that didn't like to spend tax payers money.

I admit I was being sarcastic - but it wasn't meant as a "personal attack" as you suggested. I was just in response to your "snarky" comment. But you go ahead and take it any way you wish. That said - I was simply pointing out that the US Military disagreed with you about larger bayonets and had adopted the Army's M9 and the OKC3S for the Marines. Fact is - the tired old M7 was woefully inadequate and was frankly prone to breakage because it was so fragile & brittle. BTW this opinion is based on personal experience. Sure you can question the US Military's vast wisdom & decades of experience if you like or even mine for that matter. But it doesn't change the fact that they and I (a Marine) disagree with you. Again that's not a dig on you - just stating a fact. Now if you're done being butthurt because I pointed this out - feel free to point out why you like the Chinese spike and how you'd go about affixing one to your shotgun?

Snarky would be the use of the word "butthurt" after admitting being sarcastic. I must have pushed your man button having never thought of what I brought up. Nothing I said was snarky, I made a single point That being the entry of a bayonet blade into a body. Comparing a single purpose fighting tool to a multi purpose tool. I compared blade types to entry wounds that's it. I don't really care what the military does I already fought my war and I wouldn't make the point that something was the right way to do it just because someone sitting on their fat ass selling contracts thought they should do it. You must be the first grunt in US history that ever thought US military had vast amounts of wisdom...This is really special. If I decided to mount a Chinese style bayonet on weapon I would just get it done. Admit it we really know why you like this big man blade...you think its bad ass.

Not denying my love for bayonets - I am a Marine after all - so sue me. And yes - they are badass! As for me being the first "Grunt" - for the sake of full disclosure - I was actually an Airwinger - I wasn't infantry. I usually had my ass hanging out the door of a Huey with an M-60D next to me. But we all started out the same and went through the same basic training - so I guess I come by it naturally. Not sure what your background is "Team Hansen Honda" or if you've ever had any military background - but I suspect the Military's vastly more experience on the topic than you have. But perhaps "wisdom" wasn't the best choice of words on my part - so I'll give you that. But to your point about "pike" or "spike" types of combat blades have been long considered better for "fighting" blades. Example - before the Marines adopted their beloved KABAR fighting knife - they toyed with the idea of using a commando dagger/knife blade - but the problem was it was a dedicated fighting blade and not remotely utilitarian. Not idea for other duties (like "chopping wood") that soldiers and Marines might encounter in the field. In fact we found the commando blades to be utterly worthless for any of those more mundane tasks. And I suspect that has long been one of the determining factors behind most modern bayonets by most militaries around the globe since the early 20th Century. As they know that their troops will be using them for other duties besides just affixing to the end of their rifles for close combat. Marines in my era typically carried two different blades. A fighting knife - like the KABAR and a M7 Bayonet for their rifle. Looking at the new Ontario blades - from my perspective it's easy to see that the military procurement folks had this in mind. Trying to take two pieces of gear and combining them into one. Thus - one less thing our troops have to carry into combat. Still - I knew plenty of Marines who still covet the KABAR even if they do have the new USMC Bayonet. But again if you think I was "attacking" you - sure - by all means - do whatever you want.