It wouldn't matter. The Spurs would still win

I don’t think the Kings feared the Spurs, would’ve been a great series though

@@yellowduck-2024 YEAH TIM DONAGHY AND SPURS WILL STILL WIN THAT MAKES WEBBER FIVE TIME BETTER PLAYER THAN DUNCAN. WE SAW HOW DUNCAN WON RINGS IN VEGAS. WHEN DAVID STERN EJECTED STARTING 5 OF PHOENIX. BUT NO MATTER LUIS SCOLA XPOSES HIM TOOK HIS GOLD.

Interesting. But San Antonio had the Kings' numbers this season (3-1). Kings' lack of discipline, commitment to defense, and court smarts won't help matters.

Well the Chris Webber Kings during this era actually had a one game advantage against the Spurs during all of their battles over a 5-6 year stretch, I think you underestimate them. They were the number one ranked defensive field goal % in 2002-2003 by the way@@OrionOodama

👍

They had the best record in the league in 2003-2004 until C-Webb came back from injury & was slow with no explosiveness & just bogged the team down. Brad Miller proved to be a good acquisition in his absence as he made the all star team that season. I remember the game in San Antonio where the Kings, particularly Vlade Divac, picked them apart with their passing. Their offense was historically good until C-Webb's return that year. The Kings' real implosion & dismantling of this particular team occurred the following season in 2004-05. The Spurs meanwhile in 2003-04 were good, but not great and had some inconsistent play throughout the first half of the season before failing to defend their title, losing to the Lakers on Fisher's .04 shot.

​@@geekUSA101 Thanks for the reminder. ;)

@@geekUSA101 yet My Lakers got there ass beat in the finals by Detroit

👍

EASY TO PLAY DEFENSE WHEN ADMIRAL BETTER RIM PROTECTOR SAVING YOUR BACK. DUNCAN WAS NEVER ELITE U MEAN LUIS SCOLA WAS BETTER THAN DUNCAN

@@PIP...33 what would a Maaldweeb Timmy D video be without the two big anti-TD miseries in ZZZ Vain and Perditas, lol.

😄

Webber and other pf's were better offensively and Duncan's "elite" defense is overrated.

Cwebb had much more talent than Timm but for some reasons had a worse career than him.

@@gezimkryeziu2071more explosive, athletic play early on = more injuries later on

He is. That's why he became a repeat MVP. Would be nice for a three-peat, but KG cannot be denied while wear and tear had caught up with Tim from playing at the Olympic qualifier.

@@gezimkryeziu2071It’s the same reason as comparing TMAC & Kobe. Both TMAC and CWebb are more talented than Kobe Bryant and Tim Duncan, but the latter 2 have FAR superior work ethic, leadership skills, better defensively and better clutch 2 way players. Being more talented doesn’t always resort to better results.

@@Theterminato2013 no way id say tmac more talented then kobe no way jose kobe had way better dunks on 7 footers 360 on yao ming then tmac

WHEN U CLOSE EYES U IMAGINE LEBRON BREAD

ill take rodman over duncan lol

@@ziginaigra Rodman?

@@JamesHardenoverKobe ye why not on pf if i have some other center

@@JamesHardenoverKobe ILL TAKE LUIS SCOLA OVER DUNCAN. FACT IS PROOVEN.

@@ziginaigra ILL TAKE LUIS SCOLA OVER DUNCAN

Robinson was great.Could put up huge stats.Couldn’t perform in playoffs.Pressure and criticism got in his head.Duncan was unfazed by such things.Team adopted the same mentality and would win 5 chips under Duncan’s leadership.

@@DukeTolgoI don't want to take anything away from Tim Duncan, but his role in the team during the last championship was rather marginal, because he was already a shadow player for the last 5 seasons. just like Dawid Robinson, whose career was completely changed by injuries, and in the first 8 seasons he performed at a level that Duncan had no access to. Many people judge Robinson through the prism of one fight with Olajuwon, in which Hakeem made several spectacular pump fakes. In Duncan's time, SAS had a generally stronger squad, which translated into better team results.

@@adamullmann626 lmao Duncan in his last championship was still the 2nd best player on the team behind Kawhi.Marginal?Really? Lol Robinson’s 1995 squad was stacked and he still lost.A lesser squad in 1999 won thanks to Duncan. Funny how the Spurs didn’t win before Duncan and haven’t since he’s been gone for 8 years.

@@DukeTolgoThe Spurs in 1995 were no were as good and stacked as they were in 1999. Outside of Admiral and Sean Elliot, the Spurs didn’t had many reliable offensive players who can knock down shots in the clutch. That was solved in 1999 when they had sophomore Tim Duncan, Mario Ellie, and much stronger bench with Jaren Jackson, Steve Kerr, Jerome Kersey and Malik Rose to support Robinson and Elliot.